Comparison of Treatment Outcomes of Different Immobilized Finger Positions After Repair of Flexor Tendon Rupture in Zones I and II: A Nonrandomized Controlled Trial With Historical Control Group.

Introduction The position of finger immobilization after flexor tendon rupture repair is changed to the extended position to prevent flexion contracture of the interphalangeal (IP) joint. However, in Strickland's assessment, We believe that a reduction in TAF (total active flexion) affects the outcome and that extension fixation is not necessarily the primary focus. For example, there are management methods that swap the fixed position between day and night. It is assumed that some effect is sought by placing the fingers in the flexed position. That is, the method of fixation is currently selected at individual facilities through twists and turns; however, the indications and criteria for selecting finger fixation positions are ambiguous, and they are apparently subject to the experience of therapists. This study aimed to characterize follow-up outcomes of flexion and extension fixation after zones I and II flexor tendon rupture repair. Methods This nonrandomized controlled trial with historical controls included 25 patients with flexor tendon ruptures of 30 fingers. The flexion fixation group consisted of 12 patients (n=16 fingers) and the extension fixation group consisted of 13 patients (n=14 fingers). The group with flexion fixation comprised patients who slept with their injured fingers in the flexed position (intervention group). The group with extension was retrospectively selected between April 2017 and March 2019, who slept with their injured finger in the extended position (historical control group). Strickland assessments of the range of motion (ROM) of each joint at the conclusion of hand therapy, the ratio of total active motion of the repaired, to the healthy finger (%TAF), and IP joint extension limitation angles were compared using Mann-Whitney U tests. Ratios of excellent and good ratings based on the Strickland assessment were compared using Fisher exact tests. Result The results of the Strickland assessment showed excellent or good outcomes for 22 (73%) of 30 fingers, which was in line with our previous findings. Strickland ratings of excellent were achieved in seven (44%) of 16 fingers and four (28%) of 14 fingers in the groups with flexion and extension fixation, respectively. The outcomes for two (22%) of 16 fingers and seven (78%) of 14 fingers in the groups with flexion and extension fixation were, respectively, rated as good. The proportion of patients rated as excellent was significantly higher in the group with flexion than extension fixation (p=0.040). The %TAF and the active flexion angle of the distal interphalangeal (DIP) joint were higher in the group with flexion than extension fixation (p=0008 and p=0.025, respectively). Furthermore, the total angle of the IP joint limit of extension did not significantly differ between the groups. Conclusion Flexion fixation after flexor tendon rupture achieved an excellent Strickland rating and was more effective than extension fixation, especially in terms of the active flexion ROM of the DIP joint. Flexion fixation might be an alternative to extension fixation because the range of flexion should be greater and might provide a range of finger extension motion equivalent to that of extension fixation.

Comparison the Range of Motion Following Early Versus Late Active Mobilization after Repairing Surgery on Flexor Tendon Injury in the Zone II: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Background: Early or delayed mobilization of limb after flexor tendon rupture repairing has an effect on postoperative outcomes, however it is not yet clear whether early or late organ mobilization leads to more likelihood of recovery. We aimed to assess the effects of early and late active limb mobilization through rehabilitation after surgery on the range of motion and hand recovery. Methods: This randomized clinical study was performed in Sina Hospital, Tehran, Iran in 2022 on 80 patients with flexor tendon damage in the zone II, who underwent reconstructive surgery of superficial and deep tendons. Patients were randomly (using random number table) divided into two groups that for one group, rehabilitation was done early (starting after three days, n = 53) and for the other group, rehabilitation was done late (starting after three weeks, n = 27). The patients were examined postoperatively and following occupational therapy and the range of motion of their involved joints was calculated. Results: The means PIP extension Lag, PIP active flexion, DIP extension Lag, DIP active flexion and total active motion were all significantly higher in those patients planned for early mobilization as compared to those who considered for late mobilization(P=0.031). Such a significant difference was also revealed adjusting baseline parameters. Conclusion: Compared to the delayed start of hand flexor tendon mobility, the early start of these activities is associated with a much greater improvement in the movement function of this tendon.

Cyclic testing of six-strand suture techniques for zone 2 flexor tendon lacerations.

BACKGROUND: Biomechanical analysis using cyclic testing for repaired flexor tendons is a clinically relevant method. The aim of this study was to evaluate the tensile properties of two six-strand suture techniques, the triple looped suture and Yoshizu #1 suture techniques using cyclic testing under simulating early active mobilization conditions. METHODS: Twenty-five flexor digitorum profundus tendons harvested from fresh frozen human cadaver hands were repaired in zone 2 utilizing one of three repair techniques: the 2-strand modified Kessler (MK) technique as a control, the triple looped suture (TLS) and Yoshizu #1 suture (Y1) techniques. In each suture technique, 4-0 monofilament nylon sutures were used for core sutures and 6-0 monofilament nylon sutures for circumferential running sutures. Cyclic testing was performed using 20 N with 600 cycles at 1 Hz. RESULTS: Five out of eight specimens in the MK group ruptured during cyclic testing. Thus, this group was excluded from analysis. On the other hand, all tendons in the TLS and Y1 groups tolerated cyclic testing. Average gaps of the TLS and Y1 groups were 0.5 ± 0.8 mm and 1.9 ± 2.2 mm, respectively. All tendons in the TLS group and six out of nine tendons in the Y1 group formed gaps less than 2 mm. Two tendons in the Y1 group formed a gap of 3.8 and 6.6 mm had breakage of peripheral sutures at the first cycle. Mean ultimate tensile force of the TLS and Y1 group measured after cyclic tensing, were 66.2 ± 9.0 N and 65.9 ± 13.1 N, respectively. No statistical difference between the two groups was found in gap and ultimate tensile forces. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggested that the TLS and Y1 techniques have tensile properties to allow early active mobilization. None of tendons repaired with the TLS technique had gaps more than 2 mm.

Outcomes of Primary Flexor Tendon Repairs in Zones 2 and 3: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Purpose: The aims of this retrospective cohort study were to present outcomes of zone 2 and 3 primary flexor tendon repairs and to evaluate how clinical outcomes change over time within and between zones of injury at weeks 6, 13, and 26. Methods: Data were retrieved from a multicenter flexor tendon cohort registry from 2014 to 2021. The inclusion criteria were: (1) adult patients after primary flexor tendon surgery in zone 2 or 3, (2) flexor digitorum profundus laceration of >50%, (3) 4-6 multistrand flexor digitorum profundus core suture, and (4) early active motion protocol. The primary outcome was the range of motion. Secondary outcomes were strength, patient satisfaction on an 11-point Likert scale, and self-reported physical function measured with the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire 6, 13, and 26 weeks after surgery. Results: We evaluated 33 patients after 39 tendon repairs in zone 3 and 174 repairs in zone 2 of 163 patients. Range of motion significantly improved over time in both zones (P < .001 to .01). Between-group range of motion differences were nonsignificant except for week 26 (P < .001) for the zone 3 group. Hand strength significantly improved in both zones over time (P < .001 to .01), while between-zone strength differences were statistically nonsignificant (P = .37 to .93). Patient satisfaction was generally good to high (mean 6.8 to 8.0 points) with significant within-group changes in both zones (P < .001). There were no relevant between-zone differences in Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores at any time point. Conclusions: Patients had significantly improved clinical outcomes in both zones. The zone of injury significantly affected the total active motion scores at the final assessment after 26 weeks for the zone 3 injuries. For the secondary outcomes hand strength, patient satisfaction, and Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores, we discovered no significant between-group differences. Type of study/level of evidence: Therapeutic IV.

Wide-Awake Local Anesthesia No Tourniquet (WALANT) for Flexor Tendon Repairs as Change in Practice During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Retrospective Cohort Study With Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic forced many changes. In our unit, there was a significant shift from traditional anesthesia (TA) which included general or regional anesthesia, to Wide-Awake Local Anesthesia No Tourniquet (WALANT) for the treatment of flexor tendon injuries. Zones I and II injuries have always been a challenge. The primary aim of this study is to compare the 12-week range of motion (ROM) flexor tendon repair outcomes between the TA group and wide-awake (WA) group patients. The secondary aim is to compare the complications and the follow-up rate between the two groups. METHODS: All patients who underwent a primary finger flexor tendon repair in zone I or II without tendon graft for closed avulsions or open lacerations between April 2020 and March 2021 were included in the study. Electronic medical records were reviewed to record demographics, follow-up, ROM outcomes and complications. RESULTS: Forty-four patients with 49 injured fingers were in the WA group, and 24 patients with 37 injured fingers were in the TA group. A complete follow-up with 12-week ROM outcomes was available for 15 patients with 16 injured fingers in the WA group and nine patients with 13 injured fingers in the TA group. Excellent to good outcomes in the WA group were reported in 56% of the cases versus 31% in the TA group, although the difference was not statistically significant. There were similar complications in both groups, with an overall rupture rate of 11.6%, a tenolysis rate of 3.5% and a reoperation rate of 9.3%. Complete 12-week follow-up was completed by 41% of patients overall after taking tendon ruptures into account. CONCLUSIONS: This is one of the first studies comparing zones I and II flexor tendon ROM outcomes between WA anesthesia and TA. Overall, there was a trend toward superior ROM outcomes in the WA group, with similar complication rates in both groups. The difference between ROM outcomes was not statistically significant and the small sample size undermined the strength of the study. To provide stronger evidence, better-designed prospective studies are suggested that would compare WA techniques with TA techniques.

Rehabilitation following flexor tendon injury in Zone 2: a randomized controlled study.

The aim of this study was to compare an early active motion (EAM) regimen to a modified Kleinert passive motion therapy in Zone 2 flexor tendon injuries with regards to range of motion (ROM), grip strength and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Seventy-two patients were included. At 3 months postoperatively, we found no difference in total active motion (TAM) between the EAM and the Kleinert groups (median 195.5°, range 115°-273° versus median 191.5°, range 113°-260°), but a significantly better grip strength (median 76%, range 44%-99% versus median 54%, range 19%-101%; p < 0.0005) in the EAM group. Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score as well as patient-reported weakness, cold intolerance and problems in daily activities also favoured the EAM group. At 12 months postoperatively, there was no difference in TAM, grip strength or any of the PROMs used. We conclude that EAM leads to a quicker recovery in terms of grip strength and PROMs, but that both regimens lead to similar results at 12 months.Level of evidence: I.

Surgical Considerations for Flexor Tendon Repair: Timing and Choice of Repair Technique and Rehabilitation.

Flexor tendon injuries are common and occur mostly due to penetrating trauma. Surgical repair is required for complete tendon lacerations, and many techniques exist. This article reviews the principles of tendon structure, function, healing, and anatomy. Repair techniques are discussed in detail for each flexor tendon zone. Postoperative rehabilitation greatly influences outcomes, and several protocols are described.

Closed Traumatic Zone 2 Flexor Tendon Injury of the Long Finger - A Case Report.

Closed rupture of the flexor digitorum profundus (FDP) tendon causes loss of flexion at the distal interphalangeal joint. Following trauma, these are known to present as avulsion fractures (Jersey finger) commonly in ring fingers. Traumatic tendon ruptures at the other flexor zones are seldom noted and are often missed. In this report, we present a rare case of closed traumatic tendon rupture of the long finger FDP at zone 2. Though it was missed initially, was confirmed with Magnetic Resonance Imaging and underwent successful reconstruction using an ipsilateral palmaris longus graft. Level of Evidence: Level V (Therapeutic).

Patients' experiences of flexor tendon rehabilitation in relation to adherence: a qualitative study.

PURPOSE: To explore patients' experiences of early active motion flexor tendon rehabilitation in relation to adherence to restrictions and outcome of rehabilitation. METHOD: Seventeen patients with a flexor tendon injury in one or several fingers participated in qualitative interviews performed between 74 and 111 days after surgery. Data were analysed using directed content analysis with the Health Belief Model (HBM) as a theoretical framework. RESULTS: Perceived severity of hand function and susceptibility to loss of hand function affected the participants' behaviour. A higher perceived threat increased motivation to exercise and be cautious in activities. During rehabilitation, the perceived benefits or efficacy of doing exercise and following restrictions were compared to the cost of doing so, leading to adherence or non-adherence behaviour. Perceived self-efficacy was affected by previous knowledge and varied through the rehabilitation period. External factors and interaction with therapists influenced the perception of the severity of the injury and the cost and benefits of adhering to rehabilitation. CONCLUSION: Patient's perception of the injury, the effectiveness of exercises, context and social support to manage daily life affected adherence to restriction, motivation and commitment to rehabilitation. The HBM as a theoretical framework can be beneficial for understanding factors that influence patients' adherence.Implications for RehabilitationInformation regarding the injury and consequences for the patient should be presented at different time points and in different ways, tailored to the patient.It' is important to aid patients to perceive the small gradual improvements in hand function to create motivation to adhere to exercise.Strategies to reduce the cost of adherence in terms of managing everyday life should be addressed by individually based strategies.Instructions regarding exercise and restrictions should be less complex and consider the patient's individual needs.

Strength, bulk and surgery time of ex situ versus in situ flexor tendon repair in a cadaveric model.

The purpose of this study was to compare strength, bulk and time of repair of human cadaveric flexor digitorum profundus tendons repaired in situ versus ex situ. Ninety-six human cadaveric flexor digitorum profundus tendons were transected 5 mm distal to the A2-pulley and randomized to 2-strand, 4-strand or 6-strand repairs. We found no significant differences in repair strength between in situ and ex situ repairs, but repair strength increased with increasing number of strands. The cross-sectional area of the repair was not significantly related to the number of strands, but 4- and 6-strand in situ repairs were bulkier than ex situ repairs. In situ repair took longer, and repair time increased with increasing number of strands. We suggest that cadaveric studies of flexor tendon repair should be performed in situ in order to better mimic the clinical reality of tissue handling and repair bulkiness.

Comparing the outcomes of fingertip-to-palm and fingertip-to-forearm two-stage flexor tendon reconstruction for isolated flexor digitorum profundus tendon injuries.

Flexor tendon injuries of the hand have devastating consequences when primary tendon repair fails or left untreated in the first place. Flexor tendon reconstruction is a substantial treatment option to obtain functional digit. In this study, we aimed to compare the functional outcomes and technical feasibility of fingertip-to-palm and fingertip-to-forearm tendon reconstruction methods. Thirty-five patients were divided into two groups according to the proximal attachment site of the free tendon grafts. Group I consisted of 18 patients whose tendon grafts were placed from fingertip-to-palm (zone III). Group II consisted of 17 patients whose tendon grafts were placed from fingertip-to-forearm (zone V). The mean of 39.6 months (range, 6-52 months) of follow-up with complete clinical data were obtained for all the cases. The mean length of the tendon grafts used in group I and group II was 9.7 ± 1.4 cm and 15.9 ± 1.2 cm, respectively. Significantly shorter tendon grafts were needed in group I (p < 0.001). Both mean DASH score and mean Michigan score were significantly improved postoperatively in both groups (p = 0.0001, p = 0.0001), but there was no significant difference between two groups based on postoperative DASH score (p = 0.112) and Michigan score (p = 0.151). No statistically significant difference was observed between two groups in terms of Strickland's scores (p = 0.868). This study demonstrates that comparable results can be obtained with fingertip-to-palm and fingertip-to-forearm staged tendon reconstructions. Fingertip-to-palm tendon reconstruction seems to be more advantageous when multiple flexor tendon injuries aimed to be reconstructed, in which requirement of tendon graft can be fulfilled with less donor site morbidity.Abbreviations: DASH: disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand.

Modified Pull-Out Technique for Zone One Flexor Digitorum Profundus Repair.

Pull-out suture fixation is widely used to fix zone one flexor tendon injuries. The original technique of Bunnell generally has good results. However, in some cases, it may result in complications, including nail deformity and infection. The all-inside techniques for fixation of the tendon at this zone cannot totally replace the Pull-out technique. In this article, we propose a modification of the pull-out technique, which can reduce the complications and report the results of our patients' series.

Revision of Flexor Tendon Repair: Factors Associated With Flexor Tenolysis.

BACKGROUND: Tenolysis restores mobility to the flexor tendon through the lysis of adhesions that inhibit and negatively impact functional outcomes following flexor tendon repair. Despite extensive literature on operative techniques and therapy protocols used to minimize adhesion formation, there are limited data examining the association of patient, injury, and postoperative factors with tenolysis. This study aims to: (1) quantify tenolysis rates following flexor tendon repair or reconstruction; and (2) identify patient demographic factors, medical comorbidities, injury characteristics, postoperative diagnoses, and complications associated with tenolysis. METHODS: PearlDiver was used to identify patients who underwent a flexor tendon repair or reconstruction from 2010 to 2020. Patients were stratified by whether or not flexor tenolysis was performed. Patient demographics, comorbidities, injury characteristics, postoperative diagnoses, and complications were recorded. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent risk factors associated with tenolysis. RESULTS: Database review identified 10 264 patients who underwent either flexor tendon repair or reconstruction, with 612 patients (6.0%) subsequently undergoing tenolysis. Logistic regression analysis determined that vascular injury preceding flexor tendon repair, surgical wound disruption, nerve injury diagnosed postoperatively, postoperative tendon rupture, and need for repeat flexor tendon repair were associated with an increased odds of tenolysis. Patient age, sex, and comorbidities were not associated with performance of tenolysis. CONCLUSIONS: Although tenolysis rates may differ according to physician and patient preferences, identification of factors associated with tenolysis following flexor tendon repair allows surgeons to risk-stratify patients prior to surgery and help guide postoperative expectations if complications arise.

Large animal models for the study of tendinopathy.

Tendinopathy has a high incidence in athletes and the aging population. It can cause pain and movement disorders, and is one of the most difficult problems in orthopedics. Animal models of tendinopathy provide potentially efficient and effective means to develop understanding of human tendinopathy and its underlying pathological mechanisms and treatments. The selection of preclinical models is essential to ensure the successful translation of effective and innovative treatments into clinical practice. Large animals can be used in both micro- and macro-level research owing to their similarity to humans in size, structure, and function. This article reviews the application of large animal models in tendinopathy regarding injuries to four tendons: rotator cuff, patellar ligament, Achilles tendon, and flexor tendon. The advantages and disadvantages of studying tendinopathy with large animal models are summarized. It is hoped that, with further development of animal models of tendinopathy, new strategies for the prevention and treatment of tendinopathy in humans will be developed.

Hidrodisección ecoguiada peritendinosa ¿alternativa a la tenólisis para tratar adherencias? / Ultrasound-Guided Peritendinous Hydrodissection, an Alternative to Tenolysis Adhesions?

El tratamiento de las lesiones de los tendones flexores de la mano sigue siendo un problema clínico importante y frecuente. La tasa de adherencias posterior a la tenorrafia de tendón flexor es elevada. A día de hoy, el tratamiento es la tenólisis quirúgica, no siempre con resultados satisfactorios.La hidrodisección ecoguiada por ultrasonido es una novedosa técnica intervencionista que consiste en introducir una solución para liberar un espacio comprometido o distender y separar mecánicamente estructuras comprimidas o adheridas. Se plantea la hidrodisección ecoguiada como una alternativa a la reintervención o tras fracaso de la cirugía.Describimos el primer caso publicado de hidrodisección ecoguiada peritendinosa de adherencias tras lesión de tendón flexor. Proponemos como alternativa a la cirugía o tenólisis, con resultados esperanzadores.(AU)

Flexor tendon injuries of the hand treatment remains an important and common clinical problem. The rate of adhesions after flexor tendon tenorrhaphy is high. Today the treatment is surgical tenolysis, not always with satisfactory results.Ultrasound-guided hydrodissection is a novel interventional technique that consists of introducing a solution to free a compromised space or to distend and mechanically separate compressed or adhered structures. Ultrasound-guided hydrodissection is considered as an alternative to reoperation or after surgery failure.We report the first published case of ultrasound-guided peritendinous hydrodissection of adhesions after flexor tendon injury. We propose as an alternative to surgery or tenolysis, with encouraging results.(AU)

The Effect of Text Message-based Support Program (TextRehab) on Treatment Outcomes of Patients with Hand Flexor Tendon Injuries after Repair: A Randomized Controlled Trial Study Protocol.

Background: Post-operative rehabilitation for patients with flexor tendon injuries is necessary for a full recovery. This randomized controlled trial study investigates the effectiveness of a text message-based rehabilitation program (i.e., TextRehab) on the improvement rate of hand rehabilitation in patients with flexor tendon injuries after repair. Methods: This study is designed as a randomized, three-month, single-center, two-arm, parallel controlled trial. A total of 40 patients will be randomly classified as either the control or intervention group. Both groups receive usual care; however, the intervention group is also asked to perform the designed rehabilitation activities through the TextRehab program. The activity instructions are sent to patients step by step at least once a day. Self-reported outcomes will be assessed at 6 and 12 weeks after discharge and include self-reported Patient Rated Wrist Evaluation, self-reported Quick-Disability of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand, and Visual Analogue Scale. Moreover, the reports of the physician regarding the grip strength and Total Active Motion will be assessed at week 12. Results: The development of the message scheduling system and its contents is completed. This trial has the code of ethics in research (removed due to blinding issues). Study results are expected to be available in mid-2021. Conclusion: The TextRehab program is developed to provide advice, motivation, information, and care for patients with hand flexor tendon injuries after repair. This trial provides evidence of the effectiveness of sending text messages on persuading patients to perform home-based rehabilitation activities.

A Biomechanical Comparison of Gliding Resistance between Modified Lim Tsai and Asymmetric Tendon Repair Techniques in Zone II Flexor Tendon Repairs.

Background: Early active motion protocols have shown better functional outcomes in zone II flexor tendon lacerations. Different techniques of tendon repair have different effects on gliding resistance, which can impact tendon excursion and adhesion formation. For successful initiation of early active mobilisation, the repair technique should have high breaking strength and low gliding resistance. Previous studies have shown the Modified Lim-Tsai technique demonstrates these characteristics. The Asymmetric repair has also shown superior ultimate tensile strength. This study aims to compare the gliding resistance between the two techniques. Methods: FDP tendons from ten fresh frozen cadaveric fingers were randomly divided into two groups, transected completely distal to the sheath of the A2 pulley and repaired using either the Modified Lim-Tsai or Asymmetric technique. The core repair was performed with Supramid 4-0 looped sutures and circumferential epitendinous sutures were done with nylon monofilament Prolene 6-0 sutures. The gliding resistance and ultimate tensile strength were then tested. Results: The gliding resistance of the Asymmetric and Modified Lim-Tsai repair techniques were 0.2 and 0.95 N respectively. This difference was significant (p = 0.008). The Modified Lim-Tsai technique had a higher ultimate tensile strength and load to 2 mm gap formation, though this was not significant. Conclusions: Gliding resistance of the Asymmetric repair is significantly less than that of Modified Lim-Tsai. Ultimate tensile strength and load to 2 mm gap formation are comparable.

A Diagnostic Algorithm to Guide Operative Intervention of Zone 5 Flexor Injuries.

Background: Given the importance of the neurovascular structures in the volar forearm, accurate diagnosis of zone 5 flexor injuries is critical. Purpose: We sought to test the hypothesis that tendinous injury would be more likely in the distal 50% of the forearm and muscle belly injury would be more likely in the proximal 50% of the forearm. Methods: From December 2015 to December 2016, we conducted a prospective clinical study of patients 18 years and older with zone 5 flexor lacerations. We excluded those with concomitant ipsilateral injuries in flexor zones 1 to 4, multiple lacerations in flexor zone 5, prior neurovascular injuries, crush injuries, patients who underwent operative exploration prior to transfer to our facility, and patients who were unable or unwilling to provide consent. Neurovascular and musculotendinous injuries on physical examination were recorded. All patients underwent operative exploration. Physical examination accuracy and the incidence of musculotendinous and neurovascular injury in the distal 50% of the forearm were compared with the proximal 50% of the forearm. Results: The distal 50% of the forearm (group 1, n = 14) had higher probability of tendon injury (64%), whereas lacerations of the proximal 50% of the forearm (group 2, n = 5) did not result in any tendinous injuries. Rather, all patients in group 2 had muscle belly injuries. There was no difference in the rate of neurovascular injury between groups. Physical examination alone was highly accurate in diagnosing nerve injuries (93%-100%) but less accurate in diagnosing arterial injuries (79%-80%) regardless of the location of injury. Conclusions: Due to the lack of tendinous injuries in proximal zone 5 lacerations, along with the accuracy of physical examination in determining the presence of neurovascular injuries, patients with lacerations in the proximal half of the forearm, without evidence of nerve or arterial injury, can likely be observed in lieu of immediate operative exploration.

Outcomes of staged reconstruction of Zone 2 flexor tendon injuries in recent wide-awake surgical settings and an earlier case series.

We report outcomes of patients who were managed with two-stage tendon grafting for neglected Zone 2 flexor tendon injuries from 2012 until 2019. The patients were divided into two cohorts: recent series (Series 1) included patients treated with local anaesthesia and epinephrine (16 fingers, from 2015), and earlier series (Series 2) included patients treated with either general or local intravenous anaesthesia and tourniquet (12 fingers, before 2015). The patients in Series 1 achieved statistically better mean total active motion of the operated fingers and grip compared with the contralateral hand than the earlier series (p = 0.03, p = 0.01, respectively). With the Tang grading system, excellent and good results were achieved in 13 and six fingers of the patients in Series 1 and Series 2, respectively. We conclude that wide-awake second stage of staged flexor tendon grafting provides fine-tuned adjustment of length and tension of the graft, but we cannot conclude about comparative outcomes between two series because the sample size is small and the earlier series was operated by the same surgeons with lower expertise level.Level of evidence: IV.

[Ultrasound-Guided Peritendinous Hydrodissection, an Alternative to Tenolysis Adhesions?] / Hidrodisección ecoguiada peritendinosa ¿alternativa a la tenólisis para tratar adherencias?

Flexor tendon injuries of the hand treatment remains an important and common clinical problem. The rate of adhesions after flexor tendon tenorrhaphy is high. Today the treatment is surgical tenolysis, not always with satisfactory results. Ultrasound-guided hydrodissection is a novel interventional technique that consists of introducing a solution to free a compromised space or to distend and mechanically separate compressed or adhered structures. Ultrasound-guided hydrodissection is considered as an alternative to reoperation or after surgery failure. We report the first published case of ultrasound-guided peritendinous hydrodissection of adhesions after flexor tendon injury. We propose as an alternative to surgery or tenolysis, with encouraging results.