Association between markers of hepatitis B virus infection and risk of virological rebound in people with HIV receiving antiretroviral therapy.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this analysis was to investigate the impact of hepatitis B virus (HBV) coinfection on the risk of HIV viral rebound (VR) after achieving suppression for the first time following initiation of antiretroviral therapy (ART) in the real-world setting. DESIGN: Patients living with HIV (PLWH) who were enrolled in the ICONA Foundation Study cohort and achieved viral suppression ≤50 copies/mL for the first time after starting ART were prospectively evaluated and divided in three exposure groups according to serology test results: (a) HIV-monoinfected; (b) HIV-positive/HBcAb-positive/HBsAg-negative; (c) HIV-positive/HBsAg-positive. The occurrence of VR, defined as two consecutive HIV-RNA values >50 copies/mL after achieving viral suppression for the first time (baseline), was investigated. METHODS: Standard survival analysis by means of Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression analysis with the serology exposure fitted as a time-fixed covariate measured at baseline was employed after controlling for key confounding factors. RESULTS: Of a total of 5657 patients included, 4090 (72%) were HIV-monoinfected, 1342 (23.7%)were HBcAb-positive, and 225 (3.9%) were HbsAg-positive coinfected. Overall, 654 (11.5%) PLWH experienced VR > 50 copies/mL during follow-up. After controlling for all sources of measured confounding, coinfected PLWH showed an increased risk of experiencing VR compared with those who were HIV-monoinfected. In particular, the strongest associations were seen for the HIV/HBsAg-positive participants [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) = 1.56, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.03-2.38, p = 0.037] but an excess of risk was also seen in those who were HIV-positive/HBcAb-positive/HBsAg-negative (aHR = 1.25, 95% CI: 1.00-1.55, p = 0.047). CONCLUSIONS: Coinfection with HBV seems to have an impact on the probability of maintaining HIV viral suppression achieved for the first time after ART initiation. Of note, even PLWH positive for HBcAb, a marker of inactive HBV infection, appeared to be at higher risk of VR compared with those who were HIV-monoinfected and their HIV-RNA should be carefully monitored.

HBcAb Positivity as a Risk Factor for Missing HIV RNA Undetectability after the 3TC+DTG Switch.

Hepatitis B Core antibody (HBcAb) positivity is the surrogate marker of hepatitis B occult infection. This condition is not a contraindication for switching to two-drug (2DR) antiretroviral therapy; however, the removal of tenofovir may contribute to poor control of HBV replication. A multicentre retrospective cohort study investigated the impact of HBcAb positivity on HIV control in patients switching to a 2DR with Lamivudine and Dolutegravir (3TC-DTG). In this study, a comparison analysis was conducted between HBcAb-positive and -negative PLWH regarding HIV-RNA suppression, considering: (1): Target Not Detected (TND) < 20 cp/mL; (2) Target Detected (TD) < 20 cp/mL; and (3) Detectable > 20 cp/mL and <50 cp/mL and >50 copies/mL. A total of 267 patients on 2DR with 3TC-DTG were included. In comparison to HBcAb-negative, HBcAb-positive patients were older (45 years [35-54]) and had a lower CD4+ nadir (248 vs. 349 cells/mmc, p = 0.007). No difference in the maintenance of virological suppression was present in the two groups of patients before the switch. Although no patient had an HIV-RNA > 20 cp/mL after the switch, significantly fewer HBcAb-positive compared with -negative subjects resulted in TND at 12, 24, and 36 months after the switch: 52 (69.3%) versus 164 (85.4%), p = 0.004, 50 [72.5%] versus 143 [89.9%], p = 0.001, and 30 [66.7%] versus 90 [92.8%], p = 0.001, respectively. HBcAb positivity is associated with an increased risk of suboptimal HIV suppression during the 36 months after 3TC/DTG simplification. This finding reinforces the relevance of the OBI condition in PLWH and raises the issue of careful virological monitoring of such cases.

Predicting Factors of Plasma HIV RNA Undetectability after Switching to Co-Formulated Bictegravir, Emtricitabine, and Tenofovir Alafenamide in Experienced HIV-1 Patients: A Multicenter Study.

Switching to bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide (BIC/FTC/TAF) from other antiretroviral regimens is safe and effective for virologically suppressed people living with HIV (PLWH). The term virological suppression includes both low but detectable HIV viremia and undetectable HIV viremia, and the latter is possibly associated with a lower immune activation state. Herein, we describe a 24-month follow-up of experienced PLWH with plasma HIV RNA undetectable or detectable < 50 copies/ml switching to BIC/FTC/TAF. A previous 12-month monitoring was available, and the factors correlated with treatment efficacy. This retrospective multicenter study included PLWH who switched to BIC/FTC/TAF in the period of 2019-2022, and who were HBsAg and HCV RNA negative. The follow-up study times were 6 (T6), 12 (T12), 18 (T18), and 24 (T24) months after the switch (T0). Survival analysis with multiple-failure-per-subject design, Kaplan-Meier survival estimates, multivariate analysis of variance, multilevel linear regression, and a hierarchical ordered logistic model were applied. A total of 329 PLWH had plasma HIV RNA which was either undetectable or detectable at <50 copies/mL at T0, and 197 responded to all inclusion criteria: M/F 140/57; the median CD4+ cell count was 677 cells/mm3; and HIV RNA at T0 was undetectable in 108 patients. Most of the 197 patients (122, 61.9%) were on a previous INSTI-based regimen. HIV RNA undetectability was more frequent at each follow-up point in patients with HIV RNA that was undetectable at T0, and it showed a higher frequency throughout the follow-up period in patients with always-undetectable HIV RNA in the 12 months before the switch. A higher nadir CD4 cell count had a predictive role, and HBcAb positivity had no influence. In conclusion, the switch could be programmed and possibly delayed on a case-by-case basis in order to achieve persistent plasma HIV RNA undetectability. Undiagnosed loss of HBcAb has no detrimental consequences on the response to BIC/FTC/TAF.

Hepatitis B Virus Reactivation in Kidney Transplant Recipients Treated With Belatacept.

Introduction: Hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation in kidney transplant recipients has been reported in 3% to 9% of anti-HBc antibody (HBcAb)-positive HBs antigen (HBsAg)-negative patients. It has not been studied in patients receiving belatacept, a selective costimulation blocker. Methods: We performed a retrospective study of all transplant recipients receiving belatacept in 2 kidney transplantation centers in France. Among HBcAb-positive patients, we analyzed HBV reactivation rate, outcomes, and risk factors. Results: A total of 135 patients treated with belatacept were included: 32 were HBcAb-positive and 2 were HBsAg-positive. Seven patients reactivated HBV (21.9% of HBcAb-positive patients), including 5 HBsAg-negative patients (16.7% of HBcAb-positive HBsAg-negative patients). Reactivation occurred 54.8 (± 70.9) months after transplantation. One patient presented with severe hepatitis and 1 patient developed cirrhosis. There was no significant difference in survival between patients that reactivated HBV and patients that did not: 5-year patient survival of 100% (28.6; 100) and 83.4% (67.6; 100), respectively (P = 0.363); and 5-year graft survival of 100% (28.6; 100) and 79.8% (61.7; 100), respectively (P = 0.335). No factor, including HBsAb positivity and antiviral prophylaxis, was statistically associated with the risk of HBV reactivation. Conclusion: HBV reactivation rate was high in patients treated with belatacept when compared with previous transplantation studies. HBV reactivation did not impact survival. Further studies are needed to confirm these results. A systematic antiviral prophylaxis for these patients should be considered and evaluated.

The effectiveness of hepatitis B vaccine in toddlers based on the five-year period national basic health research (Riskesdas 2007, 2013 and 2018) in Indonesia.

Background: Hepatitis B is a viral infection that has a high prevalence in Indonesia. The Ministry of Health of Indonesia has conducted a national vaccination program for hepatitis B. In order to evaluate the success of the hepatitis B vaccination in Indonesia, a community study based on basic health research (Riskesdas) was performed nationwide since 2007 for five year period in 2007, 2013, and 2018. Methods: Further statistical analysis was performed specifically for the children under 59 months old (toddlers) immunized in both urban and rural areas in 2007, 2013, and 2018 based on certain characteristics by examining antibodies against HBsAg (anti-HBs), IgG antibodies against the core antigen (HBcAb), surface antigen (HBsAg) of hepatitis B virus (HBV). The data obtained from the data management laboratory of Ministry of Health, Indonesia, was analyzed with Bivariate analysis with continuity correction chi-square or Pearson chi-square using Stata software version 16. Results: This study showed an increase in hepatitis B coverage of complete immunization (30% in 2007, 60.3% in 2013, and 57% in 2018), which was also influenced by mothers' level of education (Pearson chi-square , p ¡ 0.05) and access to health service points within 30 minutes (OR = 1.3-2.8, p ¡ 0.05). The trend of the percentage of immune status (anti-HBs) was increased (41.8% in 2007; 56.1% in 2013; and 79.1% in 2018). The higher anti-HBs was found in complete hepatitis B immunization status (OR = 1.5-2, p ¡ 0.05) and in good nutritional status (p ¡ 0.05). However, the anti-HBs was found decreased with increasing age (p ¡ 0.05). The trend of positive HBcAb (exposure to HBV infection) showed a decrease gradually of almost ten times from 2007 (8.6%-13.5%) compared to 2013 (2.6%-11.1%) and 2018 (1.1%-2%). Urban areas were at higher risk of hepatitis B exposure (OR = 1.4-2.2) than rural areas (OR = 0.37-0.80). The HBsAg data were only available in 2013 and 2018. Riskesdas data analysis showed the prevalence of hepatitis B (HBsAg) was lower in complete immunization status than that in incomplete one (p ¡ 0.05), but with an increase from 3.9% (2013) to 9.3% (2018), possibly due to inappropriate implementation of birth dose immunization or a vaccine-escape mutant from the HBV variants. Conclusions: The effectiveness of hepatitis B vaccine obtained from the three Riskesdas periods in Indonesia showed an improvement, with an increase in immune status, reduced exposure to HBV and a lower prevalence of hepatitis B in children with complete vaccination. However, there is still an increase in hepatitis B infection, especially in urban areas. Therefore, a long-term evaluation of immunization coverage especially ensuring that the initial dose of immunization was given within the first 24 h of birth, HBsAg and HBcAb, nutritional status, genomic surveillance of HBV, and other aspects of program quality evaluation are needed to ensure that elimination efforts have been implemented properly.

HBsAg (-)/HBsAb (-)/HBeAg (-)/HBeAb (+)/HBcAb (+) predicts a high risk of hepatitis B reactivation in patients with B-cell lymphoma receiving rituximab based immunochemotherapy.

Patterns of hepatitis B virus reactivation (HBV-R) in HBsAg (-)/HBcAb (+) patients with B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) receiving rituximab based immunochemotherapy have not been well described. The retrospective study included 222 HBsAg (-)/HBcAb (+) NHL patients as training cohort and 127 cases as validation cohort. The incidence of HBV-R in HBsAg (-)/HBcAb (+) B-cell NHL patients was 6.3% (14/222), of which that in HBsAg (-)/HBsAb (-)/HBeAg (-)/HBeAb (+)/HBcAb (+) population was 23.7% (9/38). Multivariate analysis showed that HBsAg (-)/HBsAb (-)/HBeAg (-)/HBeAb (+)/HBcAb (+) correlated with a high risk of HBV-R in B-cell lymphoma patients (training phase hazard ratio [HR], 10.123; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.389-30.239; p < 0.001; validation phase HR, 18.619; 95% CI, 1.684-205.906; p = 0.017; combined HR, 12.264; 95% CI, 4.529-33.207; p < 0.001). In the training cohort, the mortality rate of HBsAg (-)/HBcAb (+) B-cell NHL caused by HBV-R was 14.3% (2/14) while that for HBV reactivated HBsAg (-)/HBsAb (-)/HBeAg (-)/HBeAb (+)/HBcAb (+) population was up to 44.4% (4/9). As a high incidence of HBV-R and high mortality after HBV-R was found in HBsAg (-)/HBsAb (-)/HBcAb (+)/HBeAg (-)/HBeAb (+) patients with B-cell NHL receiving rituximab based immunochemotherapy, prophylactic antiviral therapy is recommended for these patients.

Role of HBcAb Positivity in Increase of HIV-RNA Detectability after Switching to a Two-Drug Regimen Lamivudine-Based (2DR-3TC-Based) Treatment: Months 48 Results of a Multicenter Italian Cohort.

The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the presence of anti-hepatitis B (HBV) c antibodies (HBcAb positivity) could influence the control of HIV viremia in patients living with HIV (PLWH) who switch to two-drug antiretroviral therapy (2DR) containing lamivudine (3TC) (2DR-3TC-based). A retrospective multicentre observational study was conducted on 160 PLWH switching to the 2DR-3TC-based regimen: 51 HBcAb-positive and 109 HBcAb-negative patients. The HBcAb-positive PLWH group demonstrated a significantly lower percentage of subjects with HIV viral suppression with target not detected (TND) at all time points after switching (24th month: 64.7% vs. 87.8%, p < 0.0001; 36th month 62.7% vs. 86.8%, p = 0.011; 48th month 57.2% vs. 86.1%, p = 0.021 of the HBcAb-positive and HBcAb-negative groups, respectively). Logistic regression analysis showed that the presence of HBcAb positivity (OR 7.46 [95% CI 2.35−14.77], p = 0.004) could favour the emergence of HIV viral rebound by nearly 54% during the entire study follow-up after switching to 2DR-3TC.

HBV laboratory tests and demographic characteristics in 169 897 first-time blood donors / 中国输血杂志

【Objective】 To investigate the HBV infection markers detection and demographic characteristics of first-time blood donors, so as to provide evidence for blood donor recruitment. 【Methods】 HBsAg was detected by ELISA, HBsAg negative samples were tested for HBV DNA, and chemiluminescence method was used to detect HBsAg, HBsAb, HBcAb, HBeAg and HBeAb in first-time blood donor HBsAg-/HBV DNA+ samples. Demographic information of HBsAg positive first-time donors was analyzed. 【Results】 From 2018 to 2022, a total of 502 739 people participated in voluntary blood donation, and first-time blood donors accounted for 33.79%. The HBsAg positive rate of first-time donors(28.37/10 000, 482/169 897)was higher than that of repeated blood donors(3.46/10 000, 115/332 842) (OR=8.23, 95%CI: 6.72~10.09), and the HBV DNA positive rate of first-time blood donors(4.83/10 000, 82/169 897)was lower than that of repeated blood donors(6.52/10 000, 217/332 842)(OR=0.74, 95%CI: 0.57~0.95). The positive rate of HBcAb in HBsAg-/HBV DNA+ samples of first-time blood donors was 73.17%. Significant differences were noticed in HBsAg-/HBV DNA+ and HBsAg positive rate among first-time blood donors among gender, age, education background and occupation (all P<0.05). 【Conclusion】 Low risk first-time blood donor recruitment is important for blood donation. Strengthening HBV screening before blood donation and detection after blood donation is beneficial to improve the safety of blood transfusion.

Hepatitis B immunization status and risk factors of people aged 1 to 69 in Huangpu District, Shanghai, China.

Background: China has long been with high Hepatitis B Virus(HBV) prevalence in the world. The HBV prevalence of people aged 1-59 decreased to less than 8% in 2006, and by 2020, HBsAg positive rate of children aged <5 decreased to less than <1% which was due to the free three-dose hepatitis B(HepB) immunization for newborns nationwide since 2002. Huangpu district was selected as one of the pilot areas for free Hep B vaccination in newborns since 1986, which formed an early protection in the population from mother-to-child transmission. However, the existed HBV infected people were still needed to be discovered, evaluated whether to receive antiviral therapies and intervened with health education in order to reduce the incidence of viral hepatitis related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and also reach the goal to eliminate public health hazards of viral hepatitis by 2030. Objective: To know HepB immunization status among people aged 1 to 69 in Huangpu district of Shanghai, and find out risk factors changes of HBV infection. Methods: Cross-sectional study was applied to analyze the HepB immunization status and related risk factors by carrying out survey among 706 participants aged 1 to 69 years old. Blood samples were collected for detection of serological HBV markers including hepatitis B surface antigen(HBsAg), hepatitis B surface antibody(HBsAb) and hepatitis B core antibody(HBcAb). Participants with HBsAg positive were required to complete additional examinations such as alanine aminotransferase(ALT), aspartate aminotransferase(AST), total bilirubin, albumin, globulin, liver fibroscan and liver ultrasound. Results: For participants aged 1 to 14, the positive rate of HBsAg, HBsAb and HBcAb was 0.00, 50.00 and 30.46%, respectively. The HBsAb positive rate reached a peak of 90.91% at 2 years old, and then showed a significant downward trend (χ2 = 55.612, p < 0.001). All the participants have completed three-dose Hep B vaccination, however for the second dose, those who vaccinated 30 days later than the appointed time(aged one month) got higher HBcAb prevalence than those who vaccinated on time(χ2 = 5.87, p = 0.015). Two mothers were found HBsAg positive, but there was no significant difference in children's HBcAb positive rates regardless of the mothers' HBsAg results. For participants aged 15 to 69, the positive rate of HBsAg, HBsAb and HBcAb was 4.21, 44.25 and 49.23%, respectively. Multivariate analysis for HBcAb positive among people aged 15 to 69 showed that age(50-69) and HBsAb positive were the risk factors for HBcAb positive(p < 0.05). Higher education was the protective factor for HBcAb positive(p < 0.05). After the screening for HBsAg, 22 participants were tested HBsAg positive and required additional examinations, and a total of 12 completed all the examinations. One participant was recognized as active HBV infection without antivirus treatment. Among the 12 participants, 2 have received antiviral treatment before and 4 had a history of HBV infection in family members. Conclusion: In this study, HBsAg positive rate of those who aged 1 to 14 was 0.00%, which indicated that the HepB immunization has achieved a lot in protecting children from being infected. However, failing to get timely Hep B vaccination could be an influencing factor for HBcAb positive in children. As a result, additional tests for HBV DNA could be done to specify an HBV infection and more attention should be paid to the timeliness of Hep B vaccination in the next step. The HBcAb positive rate of people aged 1 to 69 was relatively higher than that of other provinces. Despite of the limited participants with full examinations, we should still put emphasis on HBV treatment and the possibility of transmission within families.

Hepatitis B Reactivation Following Eradication of HCV with Direct-Acting Antiviral Drugs (DAAs) in a Cohort of Patients from Different Institutions in Egypt.

Background: Concerns about HBV reactivation (HBVr) have been raised with the introduction of DAA for HCV treatment. The aim of the study was to assess the risk of HBVr in chronic HCV patients during or after DAA. Methods: A cohort of 166 chronic HCV patients who were treated with SOF-based DAA regimens and initially positive for HBcAb total were evaluated; 10 HBsAg-positive, 156 had past HBV exposure (HBsAg-negative/HBcAb-positive). Laboratory investigations, including liver functions tests, HBV-DNA, LSM by Transient elastography, and ARFI together with serum markers of fibrosis; APRI and FIB-4 were done at baseline and after 12 weeks of DAAs therapy. HBV-DNA levels and liver functions were monitored for assessment of HBVr. Results: Virological HBVr was diagnosed by ≥ 1 log10 IU/ml HBV-DNA levels in 2/166 patients (1.2%) among the whole HCV cohort, who were initially positive for HBsAg; 20%. Clinical HBVr (>3 folds liver enzyme elevation) was detected in one patient with virological HBVr. Conversely, none of past HBV-infected patients experienced HBVr. All patients achieved SVR12 and had a significant decline in serum transaminases, bilirubin, APRI, and LSM measurements after HCV eradication. Conclusion: HBVr might be considered after successful eradication of HCV following DAAs therapy, especially among patients who are positive for HBsAg, while past HBV infection does not seem to be a predisposing condition to HBVr.

Protective Role of Rheumatic Diseases Against Hepatitis B Virus Infection and Human Leukocyte Antigen B27 Highlighted.

BACKGROUND: By determining the hepatitis B virus (HBV) surface antigen (HBsAg) positive rate postexposure and HBV-specific antigen/antibody (Ag/Ab) level in patients with rheumatic diseases, we aimed at exploring the rheumatic link to HBV control. METHODS: Patients who underwent HBV screening in the Ruijin Hospital from 2020 to 2021 were enrolled for the exposure rate estimation. Among antibody to HBV core antigen (HBcAb)-positive patients, we adopted propensity score matching (PSM) to study the impact of rheumatism on HBsAg seroprevalence after exposure. A second PSM evaluated the Ag/Ab differences. We also had HBsAg prevalence in human leukocyte antigen B2 (HLA-B27) tested patients studied. RESULTS: With 33,989 screened patients, exposure rates remained comparable between rheumatic and non-rheumatic patients: 48.94 vs. 49.86%. PSM first yielded 2,618 balanced pairs. We observed significantly fewer patients with rheumatic diseases in HBsAg positive cases than negative ones (p < 0.001). In the second round, PSM matched 279 pairs, HBsAg (p < 0.001) and HBeAg (p < 0.05) positivity rates were significantly lower in the rheumatic patients, whereas HBsAb positivity rate (p < 0.001) and level (p < 0.01) were significantly higher. Though the value of HBcAb was overall significantly lower (p < 0.001) within the realm of rheumatic diseases, patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) demonstrated a significantly higher value than other rheumatic diseases. We saw significantly fewer HBV infections in HLA-B27 positive subjects than in the negative ones (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In this propensity score-matched study, rheumatic patients had an advantage in HBV control. In rheumatic patients, HBcAb levels, together with the beneficial role of HLA-B27, were highlighted.

The Serious Challenge of Occult Hepatitis B Virus Infection-Related Hepatocellular Carcinoma in China.

BACKGROUND: It is unknown how many people in China have chronic occult hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection (OBI) [chronic HBV infection with negative serum hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) (N-HBsAg)]. Their clinical and virological characteristics, especially the correlation between the OBI and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), are still elusive and need to be investigated, including prevention, early diagnosis, and treatment strategies. METHODS: 138 patients with HCC related to OBI were screened from 698 patients of HCC associated with HBV infection, their characteristics of epidemiology, clinical, biochemistry, virology, diagnostics, and therapeutics were analyzed retrospectively. Furthermore, the correlation between virological features and clinical features was investigated. RESULTS: It was found that 19.8% (138/698) of patients with HBV-related HCC were OBI, of which 79.7% (110/138) were men, and 20.3% (28/138) were women. Most of the patients with OBI-related HCC were older men, and the median age was 63.2 years. In total 78.3% (108/138) of the patients had apparent right upper abdomen discomfort and/or pain and then sought medical examination, while 21.7% (30/138) of the patients were identified by health examination. A total of 10.9% (15/138) of the patients were admitted with chronic infection of HBV, and 2.2% (3/138) of the patients were admitted with a family history of hepatitis B. The alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) serum-positive rate was 39.1% (54/138). Tumor lesions >5.0 cm, with intrahepatic and/or extrahepatic metastasis, were found in 72.5% (100/138) of the patients. The diameter of the tumor in the Group of hepatitis B core antibody-positive [HBcAb(+)] and hepatitis B surface antibody-positive [HBsAb(+)] was 7.03 ± 3.76 cm, which was much smaller than 8.79 ± 4.96 cm in the Group of HBcAb(+) and HBsAb(-) (P = 0.035). CONCLUSION: It is estimated that at least 21 million OBI patients live in China. HBcAb(+) was not only the evidence of chronic HBV infection but also a dangerous mark for surface antigen-negative patients. A semi-annual or annual medical checkup is essential for all OBI patients to identify HCC as early as possible. The hypothesis underlying our analysis was that hepatitis B surface antibody would prevent the progress of HCC and facilitate the clearance of HBV in patients with OBI. Thereby, the hepatitis B vaccine could be used to prevent severe disease consequences.

Humoral immunity in hepatitis B virus infection: Rehabilitating the B in HBV.

Insights into the immunopathogenesis of chronic HBV infections are fundamental in the quest for novel treatment approaches aimed at a functional cure. While much is known about the ineffective HBV-specific T-cell responses that characterise persistent HBV replication, B cells have been left largely understudied. However, an important role for humoral immunity during the natural history of HBV infections, as well as after functional cure, has been inadvertently revealed by the occurrence of HBV flares following B cell-depleting treatments. Herein, we review our current understanding of the role of the humoral immune response in chronic HBV, both at the level of HBV-specific antibody production and at the phenotypic and broader functional level of B cells. The recent development of fluorescently labelled HBV proteins has given us unprecedented insights into the phenotype and function of HBsAg- and HBcAg-specific B cells. This should fuel novel research into the mechanisms behind dysfunctional HBsAg-specific and fluctuating, possibly pathogenic, HBcAg-specific B-cell responses in chronic HBV. Finally, novel immunomodulatory treatments that partly target B cells are currently in clinical development, but a detailed assessment of their impact on HBV-specific B-cell responses is lacking. We plead for a rehabilitation of B-cell studies related to both the natural history of HBV and treatment development programmes.

Hepatitis B Virus Screening and Vaccination in Patients With HIV: A Survey of Clinicians' Current Practices.

This survey study evaluates how clinicians approach hepatitis B virus (HBV) vaccination and monitoring in patients with HIV. Providers have clinical practices that vary greatly from one another and from current guidelines, especially for patients who do not seroconvert after initial HBV vaccination and for patients with isolated hepatitis B core antibody.

Hepatitis B Screening of At-Risk Immigrants Seen at Primary Care Clinics: A Quality Improvement Project.

OBJECTIVE: To test an intervention to increase screening for hepatitis B (HBV) in at-risk immigrants in the primary care setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From a Mayo Clinic primary care panel, we identified approximately 19,000 immigrant patients from 9 high-risk countries/ethnic groups with intermediate or high prevalences of chronic HBV. Eligible patients with no record of prior HBV testing scheduled for primary care visits within the study period spanning October 1, 2017, through October 31, 2018, were identified. During the intervention period, the primary health care professional was notified by email 1 week prior to each primary care visit and encouraged to discuss screening for HBV infection and order screening tests at the appointment. We assessed rates of HBV screening during control and intervention periods. RESULTS: We identified 597 patients in the control period and 212 patients in the intervention period who had not been screened previously for HBV. During the intervention period, 31.4% (58) of the 185 eligible patients were screened for HBV vs 7.2% (43) of the 597 eligible patients in the control period. Thus, the intervention resulted in a 4.3-fold increase in screening (P<.00001). Of the 101 patients screened in the at-risk population, 22 (21.8%) screened positive for prior exposure to HBV (hepatitis B core antibody-positive) and 6 (5.9%) for chronic HBV infection (hepatitis B surface antigen-positive). CONCLUSION: Notifying primary care physicians of the high-risk status of immigrant patients substantially increased screening for HBV. Identifying patients with HBV is important for monitoring disease prevalence, preventing transmission, and initiating treatment and cancer surveillance, allowing earlier recognition and prevention of chronic hepatitis, disease reactivation, cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma.

Biomarkers for hepatitis B virus replication: an overview and a look to the future.

INTRODUCTION: Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is a major public health issue but there are no powerful drugs to eradicate the virus. HBV markers including HBsAg, HBcrAg, HBV RNA, HBcAb, and HBV DNA are becoming promising biomarkers to reflect the natural phases of chronic HBV infection and predict the outcome of anti-HBV treatment. AREAS COVERED: The authors summarized the biomarkers of HBV replication and presented the current advances of these biomarkers on predicting the outcome of anti-HBV treatment and identifying the progression of chronic HBV infection. EXPERT OPINION: HBsAg, HBcrAg, HBV RNA, HBcAb, and HBV DNA are noninvasive and feasible biomarkers for monitoring the process of anti-HBV therapy and predicting the progress of HBV infection. However, there are still no strong biomarkers with high sensitivity and specificity for clinical application. Combination of two or more HBV biomarkers, new technique for measuring HBV cccDNA, and searching novel HBV biomarkers are essential for anti-HBV treatment in the future.

Prevalence, risk factors and impact of occult HCV infection on liver morbidity among haemodialysis patients: hospital-based cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVES: Haemodialysis (HD) patients are at risk for blood-borne infections as occult HCV infection, which justifies comprehensive studies. We aimed to determine the prevalence and risk factors of occult HCV infection (OCI) among HD patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: One hundred eligible HD patients, with no evidence of overt HCV or HBV and HBV vaccinated were recruited, and tested for HCV, HBV markers and HCV RNA. Two HCV-positive patients were excluded and peripheral mononuclear cells of 98 patients were verified for viraemia. RESULTS: OCI was detected in eight (8.16%); with a median viral load of 7010copies/ml. Their mean age was 30.63 (±18.87 years) compared to others (41.73 ± 15.93) (p = .069). History of surgery, dental procedure, and blood transfusion was comparably high in both groups (p > .05). All OCI patients underwent dialysis twice weekly compared to 48.9% of non-OCI patients (p = .006). OCI patients had a significantly higher mean duration of dialysis (12.63 ± 6.74 years), and a significantly higher frequency (50%) of HCV Ab compared to 6.48 ± 4.76, and 10%, respectively, in non-OCI patients. None of OCI patients was reactive to HBcAb compared to 34 (37.8%) patients without (p = .048). Evidence of liver morbidity was detected in 5 (62.5%) OCI patients compared to 43 (47.7%) of non-OCI patients (p > .05). CONCLUSION: Among our HD patients, OCI is considered a comorbid finding associated with mild liver morbidity that warrants strict infection control and periodic testing for blood borne infections.

New Markers in Monitoring the Reactivation of Hepatitis B Virus Infection in Immunocompromised Hosts.

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) persistence is at the basis of HBV reactivation as a consequence of chemotherapy and immunosuppressive treatments. The identification of early viral replication indicators and markers of effective HBV immunological control would be useful in monitoring patients who are at risk of potential viral reactivation during the course of immunosuppressive treatment. Currently, international guidelines have shared some criteria to identify patients with a low, medium or high risk of HBV reactivation; however, permanently placing a patient in a definitive category is not always easy. More often, patients move from one category to another during the course of their immunosuppressive treatment; therefore, in many cases, there are no precise indicators or tools for monitoring possible reactivation and establishing the duration and suspension of antiviral prophylaxis. Historically, the sequence of HBV antigens and antibodies and HBV DNA levels has been used to evaluate the different stages of the acute and chronic phases of an HBV infection. In the last few years, new biomarkers, such as anti-HBs and anti-HBc titres, HBV core-related antigen (HBcrAg), ultra-sensitive HBsAg evaluation and HBV RNA, have been used in patients with an HBV infection to evaluate their diagnostic and prognostic potential. The aim of this review is to evaluate the published results on the use of new infection markers in the diagnosis and monitoring of HBV reactivation over the course of immunosuppressive treatments. Moreover, the importance of viral genotypic studies was emphasized, given the diagnostic and therapeutic implications of the mutational profiles of HBsAg during the HBV reactivation phase.

Efficacy of lamivudine prophylaxis in preventing hepatitis B virus reactivation in patients with resolved infection undergoing allogeneic SCT and receiving rituximab.

PURPOSE: Hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation during immunosuppressive therapy is common in patients with hematological malignancies, even in case of resolved infection. Prophylaxis of HBV reactivation is universally recommended in stem cell transplant (SCT) recipients and patients treated with anti-CD20 agents (i.e., rituximab). Despite its well-established favorable safety profile, lamivudine (LAM) use in prophylaxis has been debated because of the possible emergence of resistant viral strains. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of LAM in preventing HBV reactivation in allogeneic SCT recipients with a resolved HBV infection. METHODS: Patients who received first allogeneic SCT in years 2009-2016 were evaluated. Sixty-three patients with resolved infection received LAM prophylaxis and were included in the study. Baseline and post-SCT characteristics were recorded, including rituximab exposure, length of LAM prophylaxis, and time from transplant to the last clinical and virological follow-up. RESULTS: Overall, 39 patients (62%) were male, 39 (62%) had acute myeloid leukemia, 38 (60%) received transplant from haploidentical donor, 29 (53%) received myeloablative conditioning, and 15 (24%) received rituximab post-transplant. Median clinical follow-up was 24 months after SCT (range 0.3-97); median virological follow-up 16 months (range 0.3-78), and median length of LAM prophylaxis of 14.5 months (range 0.3-78). No patient experienced HBV reactivation while on LAM prophylaxis. One patient experienced reactivation 8 months after discontinuing prophylaxis. CONCLUSIONS: In this high-risk population, LAM prophylaxis was effective in preventing HBV reactivation in patients with resolved infection. It should be considered a reasonable first-line prophylactic agent to be administered in this setting.

Changes in hepatitis B virus surface antibody titer and risk of hepatitis B reactivation in HBsAg-negative/HBcAb-positive patients undergoing biologic therapy for rheumatic diseases: a prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Our aim was to investigate dynamic changes in hepatitis B virus (HBV) surface antibody (HBsAb) titer and the associated risk of HBV reactivation and clinical course in patients with HBV surface antigen negative/core antibody positive (HBsAg-/HBcAb+) serostatus during antirheumatic therapy with biologic agents. METHODS: In a prospective study from January 2013 to June 2017, we monitored the HBV serostatus of HBsAg-/HBcAb+ patients undergoing biologic therapy for rheumatic diseases. From HBsAb titers at baseline and subsequent time points, we calculated the person-years (PY) contributed by patients with different HBsAb levels: < 10 mIU/mL (negative); 10-100 mIU/mL (low); and > 100 mIU/mL (high). We analyzed the incidence of detectable HBV DNA and HBV reactivation in each group, and documented the clinical courses of patients. RESULTS: Among 380 participants, 83 (21.8%) had baseline HBsAb < 10 mIU/mL, 156 (41.1%) HBsAb 10-100 mIU/mL, and 141 (37.1%) HBsAb > 100 mIU/mL. Total PY at study end were 169.3 PY from the HBsAb-negative group, 362.7 PY from the low-titer group, and 285.8 PY from the high-titer group. Seventeen patients had detectable HBV DNA, with respective incidence rates in negative, low- and high-titer groups of 4.7/100 PY, 2.5/100 PY, and 0/100 PY. Two HBsAb-negative patients subsequently developed HBV reactivation, an incidence of 1.2/100 PY. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of HBV reactivation varied with HBsAb titer, which changed during biologic therapy. Neither HBV DNA nor reactivation were detected in patients with HBsAb > 100 mIU/mL, whereas HBV DNA without reactivation occurred periodically in patients with HBsAb 10-100 mIU/mL; HBsAb-negative serostatus was associated with a risk of HBV reactivation.