Amelioration of Photoreceptor Degeneration by Intravitreal Transplantation of Retinal Progenitor Cells in Rats.

Photoreceptor degeneration is a major cause of untreatable blindness worldwide and has recently been targeted by emerging technologies, including cell- and gene-based therapies. Cell types of neural lineage have shown promise for replacing either photoreceptors or retinal pigment epithelial cells following delivery to the subretinal space, while cells of bone marrow lineage have been tested for retinal trophic effects following delivery to the vitreous cavity. Here we explore an alternate approach in which cells from the immature neural retinal are delivered to the vitreous cavity with the goal of providing trophic support for degenerating photoreceptors. Rat and human retinal progenitor cells were transplanted to the vitreous of rats with a well-studied photoreceptor dystrophy, resulting in substantial anatomical preservation and functional rescue of vision. This work provides scientific proof-of-principle for a novel therapeutic approach to photoreceptor degeneration that is currently being evaluated in clinical trials.

Treat-and-Extend Versus Pro re nata Regimens of Ranibizumab and Aflibercept in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Comparative Study from Routine Clinical Practice.

INTRODUCTION: Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is generally given using pro re nata or "treat-and-extend" (T&E) regimens for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). Randomized clinical trials have reported that T&E is superior to Pro re nata (PRN), but results from clinical trials may not always be replicated in clinical practice. Real-world data comparing T&E and PRN regimens for nAMD are limited. The objective of this work was to report 24-month outcomes of PRN versus T&E regimens for ranibizumab and aflibercept to treat nAMD in routine clinical practice. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of data from a prospectively designed observational outcomes registry, the Fight Retinal Blindness! Project (FRB). Treatment-naïve eyes starting nAMD treatment with at least three injections using a T&E or PRN regimen were tracked by using the FRB. The primary outcome was the mean change in visual acuity (VA) measured by the number of letters read on a logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution chart at 2 years versus baseline. The secondary outcome was the number of injections at 2 years. RESULTS: From January 1, 2015 to January 31, 2019, 3313 eyes from 2948 patients with nAMD were included: 1243 eyes from 1065 patients were classified as PRN and 2070 eyes from 1935 patients started a T&E regimen. At 24 months, patients on the T&E regimen experienced significantly greater mean (95% confidence interval) improvement in VA than those on PRN (+ 4.2 [3.1, 5.2] vs. + 1.3 [0.1, 2.6] letters; p < 0.001), with more injections (14.9 standard deviation(SD) 4.3) vs. 9.8(SD 4.3); p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Eyes treated with a T&E regimen had better VA outcomes from VEGF inhibitors than eyes treated PRN. This large real-world data assessment supports previous data from randomized clinical trials that the T&E regimen delivers better outcomes than PRN.

This study focused on comparing two methods of treating neovascular age-related macular degeneration, a common eye condition. The treatments used were ranibizumab and aflibercept. We looked at the reactive "pro re nata" method, where treatment is given sporadically and only when the condition reactivates, and the proactive "treat-and-extend" method, which aims to keep the disease inactive with the fewest treatments at regular intervals. The main aim was to determine which method provides the best vision outcomes over a 24-month period and the frequency of treatment required. We found that the treat-and-extend method resulted in a greater improvement in vision than the pro re nata method, although it did require more injections. This study highlights the effectiveness of the treat-and-extend method for neovascular age-related macular degeneration, suggesting it gets better outcomes despite requiring more injections.

[Translated article] Syringes for intraocular administration: A systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: The off-label use in clinical practice of non-approved syringes for intravitreal drug administration has resulted in the detection of silicone oil drops in the vitreous of some patients. This situation derives from the lack of approved syringes for intraocular use in the Spanish market. The aim of this work is to review the use of syringes for intraocular administration, as well as to search for alternatives that meet the legal requirements for these unmet needs. METHOD: A systematic review was performed following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines by searching PubMed with the descriptors: (silicone) AND (syringes) AND ((intraocular) OR (intravitreal)) and filtering all existing publications from January 2006 to December 2023, including all those articles dealing with silicone oil release in intravitreal injections and analysing the possible consequences. RESULTS: Sixty-eight results were found, 23 of which were excluded because they did not deal with the subject under study, leaving a total of 45 articles for the systematic review. These were classified according to the conclusions obtained in 4 groups: the adverse reactions produced by silicone; the administration technique; the physicochemical aspects of silicone release; and the characteristics of the medical device. After reviewing the current manufacturers and technical data sheets of commercialised syringes, the existing syringes for this use have been collected, finding 2 that will probably be commercialised in Spain at the beginning of 2024: Zero Residual™ 0.2 ml SiO-free and VitreJect® Ophthalmic. CONCLUSIONS: From the results obtained, it can be interpreted that the use of syringes and needles with silicone for intravitreal use is a concern for health professionals due to the implications and consequences that may arise in patients, the most important being adverse reactions, so it is necessary to have silicone-free syringes on the market that are specific for intraocular use. Safety and legality in the use of intraocular syringes and needles is essential to guarantee ocular integrity and patient health.

Syringes for intraocular administration: Systematic review. / Jeringas para administración intraocular: revisión sistemática.

OBJECTIVE: The off-label use in clinical practice of non-approved syringes for intravitreal drug administration has resulted in the detection of silicone oil drops in the vitreous of some patients. This situation derives from the lack of approved syringes for intraocular use in the Spanish market. The aim of this work is to review the use of syringes for intraocular administration, as well as to search for alternatives that meet the legal requirements for these unmet needs. METHOD: A systematic review was performed following the PRISMA 2020 Guidelines by searching PubMed with the descriptors: "silicone" AND "syringes" AND ("intraocular" OR "intravitreal") and filtering all existing publications from January 2006 to December 2023, including all those articles dealing with silicone oil release in intravitreal injections and analysing the possible consequences. RESULTS: Sixty-eight results were found, 23 of which were excluded because they did not deal with the subject under study, leaving a total of 45 articles for the systematic review. These were classified according to the conclusions obtained in 4 groups: the adverse reactions produced by silicone, the administration technique, the physicochemical aspects of silicone release, and the characteristics of the medical device. After reviewing the current manufacturers and technical data sheets of commercialized syringes, the existing syringes for this use have been collected, finding two that will probably be commercialized in Spain at the beginning of 2024: Zero Residual™ 0.2 ml SiO-free and VitreJect® Ophthalmic. CONCLUSIONS: From the results obtained, it can be interpreted that the use of syringes and needles with silicone for intravitreal use is a concern for health professionals due to the implications and consequences that may arise in patients, the most important being adverse reactions, so it is necessary to have silicone-free syringes on the market that are specific for intraocular use. Safety and legality in the use of intraocular syringes and needles is essential to guarantee ocular integrity and patient health.

Real-World Study of the Effectiveness and Safety of Intracameral Bimatoprost Implant in a Clinical Setting in the United States.

Purpose: A sustained-release, biodegradable, intracameral 10-µg bimatoprost implant (Durysta) is approved for single administration per eye to lower intraocular pressure (IOP) in open-angle glaucoma (OAG) and ocular hypertension (OHT). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the IOP-lowering effectiveness and safety of a single implant administration per eye in patients with OAG or OHT in a real-world clinical setting. Methods: This was a retrospective, single-site study involving 105 consecutive adult patients with OAG or OHT treated with the bimatoprost implant in 1 or both eyes in routine clinical practice. Available medical records of the patients for 12 months or longer after the initial implant administration were reviewed, and data including IOP, IOP-lowering medication and procedure use, and safety outcomes were collected and analyzed. The analysis used ranges of follow-up because of the real-world setting. Results: The study included 197 eyes (85.3% diagnosed with OAG, 94.9% pseudophakic, and 83.8% with angle grade 4). IOP reduction was observed through 1 year after the bimatoprost implant administration. Mean IOP was 16.6 mmHg at baseline and 13.3 mmHg at 11-13 months, with the mean number of topical IOP-lowering medications used reduced from 1.4 at baseline to 0.2 at 11-13 months. IOP and IOP-lowering medication use were similarly reduced in eyes treated with both selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) and bimatoprost implant (including 66 eyes with their last SLT before implant administration and 28 eyes with their last SLT after implant administration). There were no cases of treatment-emergent corneal edema after bimatoprost implant administration, and no eye required implant removal. Conclusion: A single bimatoprost implant administration safely and effectively reduced IOP for up to 1 year and decreased the need for topical IOP-lowering medications in eyes with OAG or OHT with or without previous or subsequent SLT.

Does HbA1c Level or Glomerular Filtration Rate Affect the Clinical Response to Endothelial Growth Factor Therapy (Ranibizumab or Aflibercept) in Diabetic Macular Edema? A Real-Life Experience.

INTRODUCTION: Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy is the first-line treatment for diabetic macular edema (DME). We investigated the effect of initial glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) level and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) on treatment outcomes in patients with DME receiving anti-VEGF injections in routine clinical practice. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of data from the prospective, multi-center, observational Fight Retinal Blindness! registry was performed. A total of 178 eyes with DME treated with anti-VEGF agents (ranibizumab or aflibercept) from 1 January 2010 to 31 March 2019 were enrolled in the analysis, with the long study period to allow for up to 24 months of follow-up. Data for eyes were tracked in the Fight Retinal Blindness! registry, and clinical parameters were collected by using local software. Changes in visual (best-corrected visual acuity [BCVA], in letters) and anatomic outcomes (central subfield thickness [CST], in microns) between subgroups of patients according to baseline HbA1c level (≤ 7% vs. > 7%) and GFR (> vs. ≤ 60 ml/min/m2 at 24 months were assessed. RESULTS: The multivariate adjusted mean improvement in BCVA at 24 months of treatment was + 5.2 and + 6.8 letters in subgroups with baseline HbA1c level ≤ 7% and > 7%, respectively (p = 0.541), and + 6.9 and + 6.4 letters in subgroups with GFR > 60 and < 60 ml/min/1.73 m2, respectively (p = 0.852). The multivariate adjusted mean CST reduction was - 89.9 and - 76.4 µm in subgroups with baseline HbA1c level ≤ 7% and > 7%, respectively (p = 0.505), and - 85 and - 115 µm in subgroups with baseline GFR > 60 and ≤ 60 ml/min/1.73 m2, respectively (p = 0.130). CONCLUSION: These results seem to indicate that visual and anatomical improvement in patients receiving intravitreal VEGF inhibitors for DME are independent of baseline HbA1c level and GFR, leading to the conclusion that high HbA1c levels or low GFR should not dictate injection timing in routine clinical practice. This study offers valuable insights for ophthalmologists, enabling a personalized treatment approach and optimizing DME patient outcomes.

Our study investigated how initial levels of glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) influence the treatment outcomes of diabetic macular edema (DME). DME is a complication of diabetes characterized by retinal swelling and vision problems. We analyzed data from a registry of DME patients who received intravitreal injections of medication to reduce swelling. Our study included 178 eyes receiving anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injections in routine clinical practice. The results indicated that the initial HbA1c levels and GFR at baseline did not demonstrate a significant influence on the visual and anatomical improvements observed in patients with DME after 24 months of treatment, suggesting that HbA1c levels and kidney function should not be the primary factors taken into consideration in determining the timing of injections in routine clinical practice. These findings emphasize the importance of a personalized treatment approach that considers individual patient factors beyond HbA1c levels and kidney function to optimize outcomes for DME patients. This information can guide ophthalmologists in making informed decisions on the timing and frequency of injections for their patients with DME.

Single Administration of Bimatoprost Implant: Effects on 24-Hour Intraocular Pressure and 1-Year Outcomes.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effects of a single bimatoprost implant administration on 24-hour intraocular pressure (IOP) lowering at 8 weeks, and 1-year IOP-lowering efficacy and safety outcomes. DESIGN: Multicenter, open-label, 12-month, phase 3b study (NCT04285580). PARTICIPANTS: Adults with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. METHODS: Participants (n = 31) received 10-µg bimatoprost implant in the study eye on day 1; IOP (sitting and/or supine) was measured with pneumatonometry every 2 hours throughout a 24-hour period at baseline and week 8. IOP was measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) at hour 0 (8 am ± 1 hour) at baseline, weeks 8 and 16, and months 6, 9, and 12. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary endpoint was the week-8 hour-matched change from baseline in habitual position IOP over 24 hours assessed with pneumatonometry. Hour 0 IOP change from baseline measured with GAT in study eyes that received no additional (rescue) IOP-lowering treatment, treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), and central corneal endothelial cell density (CECD) were evaluated through 12 months. RESULTS: The mean (standard deviation [SD]) baseline IOP at hour 0 was 24.2 (2.70) mmHg and 25.3 (7.15) mmHg by GAT and pneumatonometry, respectively. Pneumatonometer measurements of IOP taken over 24 hours at week 8 with the participant in habitual position (sitting from 8 am to 10 pm, supine from 12 am to 6 am) showed consistent IOP lowering through the day and night and reduced fluctuation in IOP. The range in IOP measurements over 24 hours was reduced from baseline by a mean (SD) of -1.6 (2.98) mmHg. All 31 bimatoprost implant-treated participants completed the 12-month study; 23 (74%) required no rescue IOP-lowering treatment. The mean (SD) IOP reduction from baseline at month 12 in nonrescued eyes was -4.3 (3.35) mmHg. The most common TEAE was conjunctival hyperemia (incidence 35.5%, 11/31). No implant-treated eye had a ≥ 15% loss in CECD from baseline. CONCLUSIONS: A single intracameral administration of the bimatoprost implant lowered IOP in the habitual position consistently throughout the day and night at week 8. The majority of participants continued to have reduced IOP for 1 year without additional therapy. The 1-year safety profile was favorable. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Bimatoprost Implant Biodegradation in the Phase 3, Randomized, 20-Month ARTEMIS Studies.

Purpose: To evaluate the time course of biodegradation of an intracameral, biodegradable, sustained-release bimatoprost implant that lowers intraocular pressure without the need for daily eye drops. Methods: In 2 identically designed, randomized, phase 3 clinical trials, adults with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension and open iridocorneal angles inferiorly in the study eye were administered 10- or 15-µg bimatoprost implant (day 1 and weeks 16 and 32) or twice-daily topical timolol 0.5%. Implants were assessed on gonioscopy throughout the studies. Investigators reported whether implants were visible, estimated the size of visible implants relative to their initial size at implantation, and reported the implant location. Data for 10-µg implant placed on day 1 were pooled from both studies for analysis. Results: A total of 372 patients received the 10-µg bimatoprost implant. The degree of implant biodegradation at each follow-up time point was variable among patients. The implant frequently swelled during the initial phase of biodegradation from 6 to 28 weeks. Accelerated biodegradation occurred between 31 and 52 weeks, resulting in 82% of implants absent or ≤25% of initial size by 52 weeks. By month 20, 95% of implants had biodegraded to absent or ≤25% of initial size. The implant was predominantly located inferiorly in the iridocorneal angle. Conclusions: Bimatoprost implant biodegradation in phase 3 studies showed some degree of variability among patients. Clinically significant implant biodegradation was observed in the majority of patients by 12 months. Clinical studies are in progress to further understand implant biodegradation and the ideal timing for implant re-administration. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02247804; ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02250651.

Alzheimer PHF-tau aggregates do not spread tau pathology to the brain via the Retino-tectal projection after intraocular injection in male mouse models.

Neurofibrillary tangles (NFT), a neuronal lesion found in Alzheimer's disease (AD), are composed of fibrillary aggregates of modified forms of tau proteins. The propagation of NFT follows neuroanatomical pathways suggesting that synaptically connected neurons could transmit tau pathology by the recruitment of normal tau in a prion-like manner. Moreover, the intracerebral injection of pathological tau from AD brains induces the seeding of normal tau in mouse brain. Creutzfeldt-Jacob disease has been transmitted after ocular transplants of cornea or sclera and the scrapie agent can spread across the retino-tectal pathway after intraocular injection of scrapie mouse brain homogenates. In AD, a tau pathology has been detected in the retina. To investigate the potential risk of tau pathology transmission during eye surgery using AD tissue material, we have analysed the development of tau pathology in the visual pathway of mice models expressing murine tau, wild-type or mutant human tau after intraocular injection of pathological tau proteins from AD brains. Although these pathological tau proteins were internalized in retinal ganglion cells, they did not induce aggregation of endogenous tau nor propagation of a tau pathology in the retino-tectal pathway after a 6-month incubation period. These results suggest that retinal ganglion cells exhibit a resistance to develop a tau pathology, and that eye surgery is not a major iatrogenic risk of transmission of tau pathology, contrary to what has been observed for transmission of infectious prions in prion diseases.

Delivery of Antisense Oligonucleotides to the Mouse Retina.

The eye is the organ in charge of vision and, given its properties, has become an excellent organ to test genetic therapies, including antisense oligonucleotide (AON) technology. In fact, the first AON receiving FDA and EMA approval was meant to treat an eye condition. Currently, dozens of clinical trials are being conducted for a variety of subtypes of inherited retinal disease. Although most of them are based on gene augmentation therapies, a phase 3 and two phase 1/2 clinical trials using AONs are ongoing. Since the retina is a layered structure of nondividing cells, obtaining human retinal tissue and expanding it in the lab is not possible, unless induced pluripotent stem cell technology is used. Mouse models have helped to elucidate the function of many genes, and the retinal structure is quite similar to that of humans. Thus, drug delivery to the mouse eye can provide valuable information for further optimization of therapies. In this chapter, the protocol for intravitreal injections of AONs is described in detail.

Role of bevacizumab intraocular injection in the management of neovascular glaucoma.

AIM: To assess the long-term effects of intraocular bevacizumab (Avastin) injections as an adjunctive drug to manage patients with neovascular glaucoma (NVG). METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted consisting of 34 eyes with secondary NVG caused by proliferative diabetic retinopathy (n=25), ischemic central retinal vein occlusion (n=8), and retinal ischemia resulting from persistent detachment (n=1) were managed by intraocular injections of bevacizumab (1.25 mg/0.05 mL), in addition to other treatments. The main outcome measure was the change in the degree of iris neovascularization. Secondary outcomes included intraocular pressure and the number of additional interventions or antiglaucoma medications administered after injection. RESULTS: All patients were followed-up for at least 12mo. At the last follow-up, complete regression of rubeosis irides was detectable in 13 (38.2%) eyes and incomplete regression in 21 eyes (61.8%). The mean intraocular pressure was 45.32±7.185 mm Hg at baseline and significantly decreased to 26.15±5.679 mm Hg at the last follow-up visit (P=0.000005). Patients received an average of 4.97 injections. As additional treatments, 12 eyes (35%) received laser photocoagulation and 6 eyes (18%) underwent retinocryopexy. No further treatment was needed in 16 eyes (47.1%). CONCLUSION: Intravitreal bevacizumab injection can have a favorable effect in controlling intraocular pressure and pain control in patients with NVG because it decreases the angiogenesis and helps to augment the results of conventional procedures. The primary cause of retinal ischemia should be always targeted.

Foveal reorganization after treatment of acute foveal toxoplasmic retinochoroiditis.

PURPOSE: To report a patient with impaired vision due to foveal involvement of toxoplasmic retinochoroiditis, who was successfully treated with intravitreal clindamycin and dexamethasone and oral therapy with azithromycin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, and prednisolone and led to successful visual and anatomic recovery. CASE PRESENTATION: A 32-year-old man presented with three-day history of gradually decreasing visual acuity, redness, pain and photophobia of the right eye. Anterior chamber cellular reaction, vitritis and a white retinochoroiditis patch with adjacent retinal vasculitis in the fovea was suggestive of the toxoplasmic retinochoroiditis. He was treated with intravitreal clindamycin and dexamethasone injection followed by six-week regimen of azithromycin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, and prednisolone. In serial optical coherence tomography imaging, retinitis patch changed to cavitary foveal destruction. Fovea reorganized gradually, and visual acuity concurrently improved from counting finger 3 m to 20/25. CONCLUSION: In foveal toxoplasmic retinochoroiditis lesions, timely treatment is associated with retinal reorganization and visual improvement.

Intraocular Injection of HyStem Hydrogel Is Tolerated Well in the Rabbit Eye.

Purpose: To determine the long-term biocompatibility of HyStem® hydrogel in the rabbit eye for use as a carrier for cell or drug delivery into the ocular space. Methods: HyStem hydrogel formulation solidifies ∼20 min after reconstitution, thus can potentially form a solid deposit after injection in situ. To study the ocular disposition of fluorescein-labeled HyStem, we delivered 50 µL/eye over 1 min into the vitreous space of the rabbit. We used 3 Dutch-Belted and 3 New Zealand-pigmented rabbits, all females, delivered the gel into the right eyes, and injected 50 µL BSS Plus into the left eyes as a control. Retinal morphology was assessed by optical coherence tomography (OCT) and white light fundus photography. Fluorescence fundus photography enabled measurement of the clearance of the labeled hydrogel from the posterior chamber. Visual function was evaluated using flash and flicker electroretinography (ERG) pre- and postinjection and at weekly intervals thereafter for 6 weeks. Retinal immunohistochemistry for microglial inflammatory markers was carried out with antiglial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) antibody, isolectin B4 (IB4), and 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI). Results: The gel was successfully delivered into the vitreous space without the formation of a discrete retinal deposit. Fundus imaging, OCT measurements of retinal thickness, and immunohistochemical data indicated an absence of retinal inflammation, and ERG indicated no impact on retinal function. The half-time of HyStem clearance calculated from the loss of fundus fluorescence was 3.9 days. Conclusions: HyStem hydrogel appears to be biocompatible in the ocular space of a large eye and safe for long-term intraocular application.

Centrifuged-Concentrated Intravitreal Slurry Triamcinolone Acetonide: An Inexpensive, Easy, and Viable Alternative to Long-Term Steroid Delivery.

Purpose: This work reports the duration, safety, and viability of intravitreal slurry triamcinolone acetonide (TA; 1.0 mL of 40-mg/mL TA centrifuge concentrated into a 0.1-mL pellet) to treat cystoid macular edema (CME). Methods: A retrospective, consecutive review was conducted of patients undergoing intravitreal slurry TA injections, July 2009 to December 2018. Results: In 143 eyes of 120 patients, slurry TA resolved CME for a mean of 327.15 (SD = 213.11) days, or 10.76 (SD = 7.00) months, per intravitreal injection (n = 466). In 100 eyes requiring multiple injections (n = 423), mean duration was 270.95 (SD = 177.14) days, or 8.91 (SD = 5.82) months, between injections. In 43 single-injection eyes, duration was 749.30 (SD = 483.17) days, or 24.63 (SD = 15.88) months. Mean duration decreased from 337.89 (SD = 210.46) days, or 11.11 (SD = 6.92) months, in nonvitrectomized eyes to 279.74 (SD 179.63) days, or 9.20 (SD = 5.91) months, in vitrectomized eyes (n = 74 injections, t = 2.24, P = .014, 1-tailed). Central foveal thickness as shown on optical coherence tomography decreased by 173.89µ (SD = 147.56µ), from 459.16µ (SD = 47.14µ) to 285.27µ (SD = 77.27µ; t = -25.31, P < .001), within 43.41 days (SD = 36.86). Visual acuity improved from 20/100 (logMAR 0.70, SD = 0.33) to 20/74 (logMAR 0.57, SD = 0.31; SD = 0.21; t = -11.01, P < .001), within 33.98 (SD 24.98) days. Fifteen of 31 phakic eyes (48.39%) underwent cataract extraction. Fifty-seven eyes (39.86%) developed a steroid response (> 10 mm Hg increase from baseline) 94.79 days (SD = 85.52 days), or 3.11 (SD = 2.81) months, following injection. Conclusions: A single injection of slurry TA lasted on average 10.76 months with significant improvement of CME and visual acuity. Adverse ocular effects were comparable to currently available, long-term, implantable steroids. Slurry TA appears to be an easily reproducible, safe, and cost-effective alternative to long-term intraocular steroid delivery.

Synapse and Receptor Alterations in Two Different S100B-Induced Glaucoma-Like Models.

Glaucoma is identified by an irreversible retinal ganglion cell (RGC) loss and optic nerve damage. Over the past few years, the immune system gained importance in its genesis. In a glaucoma-like animal model with intraocular S100B injection, RGC death occurs at 14 days. In an experimental autoimmune glaucoma model with systemic S100B immunization, a loss of RGCs is accompanied by a decreased synaptic signal at 28 days. Here, we aimed to study synaptic alterations in these two models. In one group, rats received a systemic S100B immunization (n = 7/group), while in the other group, S100B was injected intraocularly (n = 6-7/group). Both groups were compared to appropriate controls and investigated after 14 days. While inhibitory post-synapses remained unchanged in both models, excitatory post-synapses degenerated in animals with intraocular S100B injection (p = 0.03). Excitatory pre-synapses tendentially increased in animals with systemic S100B immunization (p = 0.08) and significantly decreased in intraocular ones (p = 0.04). Significantly more n-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptors (both p ≤ 0.04) as well as gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) receptors (both p < 0.03) were observed in S100B animals in both models. We assume that an upregulation of these receptors causes the interacting synapse types to degenerate. Heightened levels of excitatory pre-synapses could be explained by remodeling followed by degeneration.

Intravitreal stem cell paracrine properties as a potential neuroprotective therapy for retinal photoreceptor neurodegenerative diseases.

Retinal degenerations are the leading causes of irreversible visual loss worldwide. Many pathologies included under this umbrella involve progressive degeneration and ultimate loss of the photoreceptor cells, with age-related macular degeneration and inherited and ischemic retinal diseases the most relevant. These diseases greatly impact patients' daily lives, with accompanying marked social and economic consequences. However, the currently available treatments only delay the onset or slow progression of visual impairment, and there are no cures for these photoreceptor diseases. Therefore, new therapeutic strategies are being investigated, such as gene therapy, optogenetics, cell replacement, or cell-based neuroprotection. Specifically, stem cells can secrete neurotrophic, immunomodulatory, and anti-angiogenic factors that potentially protect and preserve retinal cells from neurodegeneration. Further, neuroprotection can be used in different types of retinal degenerative diseases and at different disease stages, unlike other potential therapies. This review summarizes stem cell-based paracrine neuroprotective strategies for photoreceptor degeneration, which are under study in clinical trials, and the latest preclinical studies. Effective retinal neuroprotection could be the next frontier in photoreceptor diseases, and the development of novel neuroprotective strategies will address the unmet therapeutic needs.

Comparison of two techniques used in routine care for the treatment of inflammatory macular oedema, subconjunctival triamcinolone injection and intravitreal dexamethasone implant: medical and economic importance of this randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Whether they are injected peri- or intraocularly, corticosteroids are still essential tools in the therapeutic arsenal for treating inflammatory macular oedema. A few years ago, however, only triamcinolone acetonide was available to ophthalmologists. While this compound was initially developed for rheumatological or dermatological use, it has been increasingly deployed in ophthalmology, despite still being off-label. In 2011, the system for delivery of dexamethasone from a biodegradable, injectable implant into the vitreous cavity obtained approval for use in inflammatory macular oedema. While the efficacy and safety of triamcinolone in macular oedema, including inflammatory oedema, have already been studied, there are currently no publications on subconjunctival triamcinolone injections, which are simple, effective and well tolerated. To date, the dexamethasone 700 µg implant has been authorized for the treatment of noninfectious intermediate and posterior uveitis, but there have been no studies to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the different peri- and intraocular strategies, including the treatment of inflammatory macular oedema. METHODS: This protocol is therefore designed to compare the efficacy and safety of peri- and intraocular corticosteroid injections in the treatment of inflammatory macular oedema. In this ongoing study, 142 patients will be included, and the oedematous eye will be randomised to treatment with either subconjunctival triamcinolone injection or an intravitreal implant containing 700 µg dexamethasone. Follow-up is planned for 6 months with monthly visits. Each visit will include visual acuity measurement, a slit lamp examination, fundoscopy, intraocular pressure measurement, laser flare measurement (if available) and spectral domain optical coherence tomography. DISCUSSION: The results of this trial will have a real impact on public health if it is shown that a Kenacort retard® (i.e. triamcinolone) injection costing just €2.84 and performed in the physician's office (with no additional overhead costs) is at least as effective as the dexamethasone 700 µg implant (Ozurdex®; costing approximately €960 with the injection performed in a dedicated room), with no increased side effects. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02556424. Registered on 22 September 2015.

A comparison in precision and accuracy of the conventional syringe to the Suh precision syringe.

PURPOSE: To compare the accuracy and precision of a conventional intraocular syringe to the Suh precision syringe (SPS), a new injection device designed to decrease operator error and to reduce adverse outcomes by providing a more ergonomic technique for periocular and intraocular injections. METHODS: Participants were instructed to inject a specified quantity of water into a 0.2 mL polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tube and a sheep eye, first with the conventional syringe, and then with the SPS. The degree of needle movement during injection was video recorded and analyzed for forward-retraction movement and variability in movement. The volume of water injected into the PCR tube was also documented. Data was analyzed using a Wilcoxon signed-rank test. RESULTS: As compared to the conventional syringe, the SPS had significantly less forward-retraction movement when injecting into the sheep eye (P=0.04). Similarly, the forward-retraction movement of the needle when injecting into the PCR tube was less while using the SPS compared with the conventional syringe; however, this was not statistically significant (P=0.09). There was no significant difference in the volume of water expelled from both syringes (P=0.28). CONCLUSION: The SPS demonstrates significant potential to decrease the overall risk involved with injections through reduction of forward-retraction movement during device operation. This new syringe design also provides better control with injection depth and drug injection volume. With its more ergonomic design, the SPS has the potential to decrease risks associated with intraocular injections by improving the accuracy and precision of the injection.

Lid splinting eyelid retraction technique: a minimised sterile approach for intravitreal injections.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To describe an alternative technique for avoiding contact with the lids and lashes, without the use of a lid speculum, during intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections. METHODS: Retrospective case series of all patients undergoing intravitreal injections of bevacizumab and ranibizumab, with the lid splinting retraction technique from January 2010 to December 2015. Injections performed by six vitreoretinal specialists were included. The key preinjection ocular surface preparation includes topical anaesthetic, 5% povidone-iodine and a subconjunctival injection of 2% lidocaine with epinephrine. A second instillation of 5% povidone-iodine is given and the intravitreal injection is then performed. No lid speculum is used. A search of the electronic medical records identified patients diagnosed with postinjection endophthalmitis and charts were reviewed to ensure inclusion criteria were met. The main outcome measure was incidence of postinjection endophthalmitis. RESULTS: A total of 78 009 consecutive intravitreal injections were performed, of which 22 207 were bevacizumab and 55 802 were ranibizumab. In this cohort of patients (n=6320), 12 cases of endophthalmitis developed, corresponding to a rate of 0.015%. CONCLUSIONS: The technique of eyelid retraction for intravitreal injection has a low rate of endophthalmitis, similar to the reported rates using a metal lid speculum. This is beneficial for both the physician and the patient as it minimises patient discomfort as well as the duration of the procedure. To our knowledge, this is one of the largest studies performed to date evaluating intravitreal injection-related endophthalmitis.

Intraocular minocycline for the treatment of ocular pythiosis.

PURPOSE: A case of ocular pythiosis successfully treated with surgery and intraocular and oral minocycline is reported. SUMMARY: A 30-year-old man who wore corrective contact lenses traveled to Brazil and Colombia where he swam in salt and fresh waters while wearing contact lenses. He sought treatment at an emergency department after 2 weeks of suffering with a painful corneal ulcer, redness, and loss of vision in his right eye that had been treated at other centers with ophthalmic moxifloxacin for 10 days and with fortified topical antibiotics (amikacin and vancomycin) for 2 days. Examination using a slit lamp revealed a deep central corneal ulcer with surrounding white infiltrate, endothelial plaque, and hypopyon. Due to infection severity, the patient was admitted and received empirical antibiotic therapy and i.v. and topical antifungals. During the first corneal transplantation, the patient's original infection relapsed and was treated with voriconazole and liposomal amphotericin B intraocular injections. A subsequent infection developed, and a second keratoplasty was performed. One month after hospital admission, the patient was diagnosed with ocular pythiosis and therapy with oral minocycline was initiated. After severe infection relapse in the anterior chamber, the patient underwent a third penetrating keratoplasty, where minocycline intraocular injection was administered. After this intervention, complete infection control was achieved, and the patient was discharged 45 days after admission with oral minocycline and 1% cyclosporine and 0.3% ofloxacin eye drops. CONCLUSION: A patient with ocular pythiosis was successfully treated with penetrating keratoplasty and 2 months of treatment with intracameral and oral minocycline.