Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Heart Rhythm O2 ; 3(6Part B): 731-735, 2022 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36589010

ABSTRACT

Background: Transvenous lead extraction is the standard of care for cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) malfunction/infection-related removal. However, data on its performance and results in underdeveloped countries are limited. Objective: The purpose of this study was to report the feasibility and efficacy of a lead extraction program in a tertiary hospital in Chile, South America. Methods: Patients requiring CIED removal at the Electrophysiology Division of the Hospital las Higuera's were retrospectively analyzed. Outcomes including procedure-related mortality, procedural success and failure, and cardiac and vascular complications were reported. Results: A total of 15 patients were analyzed (median age 68 [interquartile range 52-75] years; 80% male). Patients with lead extraction difficulty index >10 represented 33% of patients. Infection was the indication for removal in all patients, with pocket infection (80%). Mechanical rotational tools were used in 66% of cases, and a total of 29 leads were removed. Procedural success was accomplished in 93% of cases. There was 1 (7%) intraprocedural complication and no procedure-related mortality. Conclusions: The development of a lead management program is feasible, safe, and effective in underdeveloped countries.

2.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol ; 32(10): 2715-2721, 2021 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34288220

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Transvenous lead extraction (TLE) is standard of care for the management of patients with cardiac implantable electronic device infection or lead-related complications. Currently, objective data on TLE in Latin America is lacking. OBJECTIVE: To describe the current practice standards in Latin American centers performing TLE. METHODS: An online survey was sent through the mailing list of the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society. Online reminders were sent through the mailing list; duplicate answers were discarded. The survey was available for 1 month, after which no more answers were accepted. RESULTS: A total of 48 answers were received, from 44 different institutions (39.6% from Colombia, 27.1% from Brazil), with most respondents (82%) being electrophysiologists. Twenty-nine institutions (66%) performed <10 lead extractions/year, with 7 (16%) institutions not performing lead extraction. Although most institutions in which lead extraction is performed reported using several tools, mechanical rotating sheaths were cited as the main tool (66%) and only 13% reported the use of laser sheaths. Management of infected leads was performed according to current guidelines. CONCLUSION: This survey is the first attempt to provide information on TLE procedures in Latin America and could provide useful information for future prospective registries. According to our results, the number of centers performing high volume lead extraction in Latin America is smaller than that reported in other continents, with most interventions performed using mechanical tools. Future prospective registries assessing acute and long-term success are needed.


Subject(s)
Defibrillators, Implantable , Pacemaker, Artificial , Device Removal , Humans , Latin America/epidemiology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Treatment Outcome
3.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol ; 43(5): 495-502, 2020 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32277706

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Venous obstructions are frequent in patients with transvenous leads, although related clinical findings are rarely reported. After lead replacement or upgrade procedures, these lesions are even more frequent, but there is still no evidence to support this observation. AIM: To investigate the incidence and possible risk factors for upper extremity deep venous thrombosis (UEDVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) after lead replacement or upgrade procedures. METHODS: Prospective cohort carried out between April 2013 and July 2016. Preoperative evaluation included venous ultrasound and pulmonary angiotomography. Diagnostic exams were repeated postoperatively to detect the study outcomes. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to identify prognostic factors. RESULTS: Among the 84 patients included, 44 (52.4%) were female and mean age was 59.3 ± 15.2 years. Lead malfunctioning (75.0%) was the main surgical procedure indication. Lead removal was performed in 44 (52.4%) cases. The rate of postoperative combined events was 32.6%, with 24 (28.6%) cases of UEDVT and six (7.1%) cases of PE. Clinical manifestations of deep venous thrombosis occurred in 10 (11.9%) patients. Independent prognostic factors for UEDVT were severe collateral circulation in the preoperative venography (odds ratio [OR] 4.7; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1-19.8; P = .037) and transvenous lead extraction (OR 27.4; 95% CI 5.8-128.8; P < .0001). CONCLUSION: Reoperations involving previously implanted transvenous leads present high rates of thromboembolic complications. Transvenous lead extraction had a significant impact on the development of UEDVT. These results show the need of further studies to evaluate the role of preventive strategies for this subgroup of patients.


Subject(s)
Device Removal/adverse effects , Electrodes, Implanted/adverse effects , Pulmonary Embolism/etiology , Upper Extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis/etiology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Pulmonary Embolism/diagnostic imaging , Reoperation , Risk Factors , Upper Extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis/diagnostic imaging
4.
J Environ Manage ; 183(Pt 3): 771-776, 2016 Dec 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27652581

ABSTRACT

Because of its precision and accuracy, Pb-Fire assay is the most employed method for gold analysis in geological materials. At the second stage of the method, namely cupellation, lead is oxidized to PbO which is absorbed by the cupel, leading to metallic gold as a tiny bend at the bottom of the recipient. After cupellation, cupel becomes highly contaminated with lead, making its disposal a serious risk of environmental contamination. In the present work, a leaching process for removing lead from cupel waste is proposed, which allowed for removing 96% of PbO by weight. After a precipitation step, 92.0% of lead was recovered from leachates in the form of PbSO4. Lead in the solid wastes left by the extraction was above the limit established by Brazilian legislation and these were classified as non-hazardous. Finally, secondary effluents generated after the precipitation step presented lead content more than twenty times lower than that of leachates from cupel waste. Tons of cupel waste are annually generated from gold analysis by Pb-Fire assay. Thus, the proposed method can contribute to prevent the discharge of high amounts of lead into the environment. Also, recovery of lead can help to partially meet the industrial demand for lead compounds.


Subject(s)
Gold/analysis , Hazardous Waste , Lead/isolation & purification , Refuse Disposal/methods , Solid Waste , Brazil , Hazardous Waste/analysis , Hazardous Waste/legislation & jurisprudence , Lead/analysis , Solid Waste/analysis
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL