A rare patient with Parkinson's disease presenting with isolated progressive micrographia.

Although handwriting impairment is a frequent sign of Parkinson's disease (PD), its significance in the evaluation processes of these patients may be overlooked among physicians. Therefore, we would like to report an illustrative patient who presented with isolated micrographia initially; but received the diagnosis of PD in the follow-up.

Rate of motor progression in Parkinson's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: The search for neuroprotective treatments for Parkinson's disease (PD) still relies largely on motor disability scales. A limitation of these tools is the strong influence of symptomatic dopaminergic treatment effects. Drawing on a wealth of published information, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of motor progression in PD and its relationships with dopaminergic therapy. Methods: We searched Medline, Embase, and Central to identify 84 publications with adequate serial motor scores to calculate progression, expressed as an increase in the percentage of maximum disability. Results: A random-effects model showed motor progression at 2.0% p.a. (95% CI 1.7-2.4%). There were no significant differences by baseline age, sample size, or observation period. However, untreated patients, in 8 publications, progressed at 4.5% p.a. compared to 1.6% p.a. in 76 studies containing individuals on dopaminergic drugs (p = 0.0004, q = 0.003). This was supported by research on phenoconversion in prodromal PD, where motor progression exceeded 5% p.a. in the 2 years before diagnosis. Starting levodopa improved pre-treatment disability by 40.3 ± 15.2%. Practically defined off state measurements increase faster than on scores by a modest degree (p = 0.05). Conclusion: This survey suggests that accurate long-term measurements of motor progression to assess disease-modifying therapies can be conducted despite the sequential commencement of dopaminergic drugs and sample attrition over time. While study designs involving prodromal or untreated PD avoid confounding effects of symptomatic treatment, different assumptions about motor progression may be needed. A defined off state with the levodopa test dose method maximizes information about the medication cycle once dopaminergic therapy has begun.

Associations between Constipation and Use of Levodopa with Nutritional Status, Polypharmacy, and Stage of Parkinson's Disease.

INTRODUCTION: Parkinson's disease (PD) is a highly prevalent disease characterized by motor and non-motor symptoms; the latter include constipation, which is considered a prodromal symptom. On the other hand, sarcopenia, polypharmacy, and malnutrition due to deficits are common in PD and lead to poorer health and quality of life. OBJECTIVE: to associate constipation and use of levodopa with nutritional status, sarcopenia, duration and stage of the disease, and polypharmacy in individuals with PD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: analytical cross-sectional observational study where an online survey was applied to 161 people suffering from PD. RESULTS: a significant association is observed between constipation and BMI (p = 0.022), as well as between the use of levodopa with BMI (p = 0.049) and polypharmacy (p = 0.046). On the other hand, there is a relationship between the average time of PD diagnosis and constipation (p = 0.0047). Finally, there is a relationship between SARC-F score applied to those over 60 years of age (p = 0.0446) and the use of levodopa. Having sarcopenia, being overweight, and having had the disease for less than five years is associated with a higher probability of experiencing constipation, according to the logistic regression analysis (p > 0.005). CONCLUSION: nutritional assessment and subsequent follow-up is of vital importance to avoid complications that could be associated with levodopa use, constipation, and sarcopenia.

Nasojejunal Tube Placement for Levodopa-carbidopa Intestinal Gel Treatment by Neurologists in Patients with Advanced Parkinson's Disease: A Retrospective Observational Study.

Introduction Short-term levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel (LCIG) treatment using nasojejunal (NJ) tubes (NJ-LCIG test) is recommended for patients with advanced Parkinson's disease to ensure compatibility with this treatment system prior to permanent percutaneous endoscopic gastrojejunostomy. However, there have been no studies on NJ tube insertion by neurologists or on possible differences in treatment efficacy based on the NJ tube insertion method or tube tip position. We therefore investigated the effects of LCIG with NJ tube placement performed by a neurologist. Methods This retrospective observational study included 13 patients with advanced Parkinson's disease and NJ tube placement between March 1, 2020, and October 31, 2023. A neurologist performed all NJ tube placements, and the daily off-time and dyskinesia time before and after NJ tube placement were compared. We also investigated the effects of differences in the NJ tube tip site. Results NJ tubes were placed using either a combination of X-ray fluoroscopy-guided insertion and gastric motility methods (23.1%) or X-ray fluoroscopy-guided insertion alone (76.9%). All tubes were successfully placed in the descending duodenum (15.4%), ascending duodenum (23.1%), or jejunum (61.5%). The off time decreased significantly after the NJ-LCIG test (pre-NJ-LCIG test, 6.6 h [5.1-8.1] vs. post-NJ-LCIG test, 2.0 h [0.8-3.5], p<0.01). There was no difference in effectiveness based on the site of NJ tube tip placement. Conclusion Our results suggest that neurologists can place NJ tubes and that the NJ-LCIG test can also improve off-time, regardless of the placement site.

Instrumented timed up and go test and machine learning-based levodopa response evaluation: a pilot study.

BACKGROUND: The acute levodopa challenge test (ALCT) is a universal method for evaluating levodopa response (LR). Assessment of Movement Disorder Society's Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale part III (MDS-UPDRS III) is a key step in ALCT, which is some extent subjective and inconvenience. METHODS: This study developed a machine learning method based on instrumented Timed Up and Go (iTUG) test to evaluate the patients' response to levodopa and compared it with classic ALCT. Forty-two patients with parkinsonism were recruited and administered with levodopa. MDS-UPDRS III and the iTUG were conducted in both OFF-and ON-medication state. Kinematic parameters, signal time and frequency domain features were extracted from sensor data. Two XGBoost models, levodopa response regression (LRR) model and motor symptom evaluation (MSE) model, were trained to predict the levodopa response (LR) of the patients using leave-one-subject-out cross-validation. RESULTS: The LR predicted by the LRR model agreed with that calculated by the classic ALCT (ICC = 0.95). When the LRR model was used to detect patients with a positive LR, the positive predictive value was 0.94. CONCLUSIONS: Machine learning based on wearable sensor data and the iTUG test may be effective and comprehensive for evaluating LR and predicting the benefit of dopaminergic therapy.

Case report: Levodopa challenge test is important in identifying dopamine-induced freezing of gait in patient with Parkinson's disease.

Introduction: Freezing of gait (FOG) is a disabling and heterogeneous symptom in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). Among them, dopamine-induced FOG is rare and difficult to identify. The treatment of dopamine-induced FOG is complex. Case presentation: We herein presented a case of PD patient who complicated with refractory FOG. It was identified as dopamine-induced FOG during levodopa challenge test. Her symptoms were alleviated after we reduced the total equivalent dosage of levodopa. Conclusion: Our report emphasizes the importance of levodopa challenge test in identifying different types of FOG, which is very important for further adjusting treatment.

Trends on Novel Targets and Nanotechnology-Based Drug Delivery System in the Treatment of Parkinson's disease: Recent Advancement in Drug Development.

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disease (ND) that affects many people. However, there remains no cure for PD and difficulties exist with conventional medicines. There has been a lot of discussion about using nanotechnology to increase the bioavailability of smallmolecule drugs to target cells in recent years. It is possible that PD treatment might become far more effective and have fewer side effects if medication delivery mechanisms were to be improved. Potential alternatives to pharmacological therapy for molecular imaging and treatment of PD may lie in abnormal proteins such as parkin, α-synuclein, leucine-rich repeat serine and threonine protein kinase 2. Published research has demonstrated encouraging outcomes when nanomedicine-based approaches are used to address the challenges of PD therapy. So, to address the present difficulties of antiparkinsonian treatment, this review outlines the key issues and limitations of antiparkinsonian medications, new therapeutic strategies, and the breadth of delivery based on nanomedicine. This review covers a wide range of subjects, including drug distribution in the brain, the efficacy of drug-loaded nano-carriers in crossing the blood-brain barrier, and their release profiles. In PD, the nano-carriers are also used. Novel techniques of pharmaceutical delivery are currently made possible by vesicular carriers, which eliminate the requirement to cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB).

Corrigendum: L-DOPA increases slow-wave sleep duration and selectively modulates memory persistence in older adults.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2023.1096720.].

Body image appearance in Parkinson's disease patients on device aided therapies.

INTRODUCTION: Parkinson's disease patients may experience altered body image perception. Advanced Parkinson's disease (aPD) with motor complications often requires surgical and device-aided treatments (DAT), such as levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel (LCIG) and deep brain stimulation (DBS). Understanding body image perception is crucial when managing these devices. This study aims to explore body image perception in aPD patients, hypothesizing a link between DAT and body image perception. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study including non-demented aPD patients with and without DAT and age- and sex-matched controls. Participants were assessed using the Appearance Schemas Inventory-Revised (ASI-R), including Motivational Salience (MS) and Self-Evaluative Salience (SES) scores. Additional data included age, education, BMI, comorbidities, pharmacotherapy, and psychopathologies. PD patients were also evaluated with UPDRS, Hoehn and Yahr scales and LEDD calculation. RESULTS: 70 aPD and 36 controls were enrolled. No differences in ASI-R scores were found between PD patients and controls, but women with PD had significantly lower MS scores than controls (16.1 ± 5.6 vs 19.7 ± 5.8; p = 0.023). Among aPD patients, those on DAT had longer disease duration, higher Hoehn and Yahr, and lower UPDRS IV scores. The lowest MS was observed in women on LCIG (12.7 ± 3.3; p = 0.001). DISCUSSION: This study shows low MS ratings driven by female gender and LCIG treatment. Women on LCIG show reduced attention and management of their appearance. This may be influenced by cultural, environmental, and biological factors. Prospective research is needed to understand the impact of DAT on body image.

Winding Back the Clock on Advanced Therapies: It's Time to Get Smart.

Our language affects patients' perceptions of therapies. In Parkinson's disease, emergent response fluctuations and dyskinesias typically trigger conversations around commencing an "Advanced Therapy" which carries notions of Advanced Disease. The patient, resolute in their commitment to fighting the disease, is misled. Chasing reassurance that their disease has not yet progressed considerably; they may therefore resist a potentially life-changing therapy. Instead, we should offer a "Smart Therapy". This term more accurately and positively describes therapies on offer that stabilize response fluctuations and improve quality of life, without a focus on the negative connotations of progression to more advanced disease.

The language we use with our patients affects their perception of a therapy on offer and their willingness to take it up. In Parkinson's disease when motor response fluctuations and dyskinesias become extremely challenging and disabling for patients despite medication optimization, it might prompt conversations with the patient in appropriate circumstances about offering an "Advanced Therapy" such as deep brain stimulation surgery or continuous infusion pumps. However, from the patient's perspective, putting up a steadfast fight against their disease, this label carries unwanted and misleading connotations of Advanced Disease. This can lead to hesitation from taking up these potentially life-changing therapies. Therefore, in this Commentary we propose a rebranding in line with other modern technology like smart phones and smart homes, emphasizing the positive and personalized features of these therapies, and focusing on the goal of stabilizing symptoms and improving quality of life. We should offer patients "Smart Therapies". It's time to Get Smart!

Satisfaction with videoconferencing support for levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel: An observational study.

Background: Levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel (LCIG) is a continuously delivered Parkinson's disease therapy intended to stabilize plasma levodopa levels. Patients receiving LCIG require education and follow-up. Some LCIG support programs use video-assisted telenursing. Objective: To examine how videoconferencing impacts satisfaction with LCIG support programs. Methods: FACILITATE CARE (Feasibility of video-Assisted Care for Intestinal Levodopa Infusion with Telenursing - observAtional Trial Evaluating patient and Caregiver Acceptance in REal life) was a 12-week, prospective, open-label, 2-arm, parallel-group, observational study assessing satisfaction with LCIG support in patients who self-assigned to video or audio-only arms. Patients aged 18-85 years had completed LCIG titration and owned a videoconferencing device (video arm only). A visual analog scale measured satisfaction (1-10, 10 being most satisfied). Results: Patients' mean (standard deviation) ages were 67.9 (7.4, n = 26) and 71.1 (6.2, n = 15) years in the video and audio arms, respectively. Patients, caregivers, and physicians in both groups reported satisfaction scores of 8-10 with LCIG support personnel, communication access, and assistance with becoming independent. At week 12, the Modified Caregiver Strain Index least square means change from baseline was lower in the video vs. audio arm (-2.3 [1.0] vs. 1.6 [1.2]). LCIG support personnel travel time was lower in the video vs. audio arm (125.7 [70.2] vs. 203.0 [70.0] minutes). Conclusions: LCIG support programs are associated with high patient, caregiver, and physician satisfaction; video and audioconferencing satisfaction are similarly high. Video-assisted telenursing may be a convenient communication avenue and may reduce caregiver burden. Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT04500106.

Therapeutic drug monitoring in Parkinson's disease.

A patient-tailored therapy of the heterogeneous, neuropsychiatric disorder of Parkinson's disease (PD) aims to improve dopamine sensitive motor symptoms and associated non-motor features. A repeated, individual adaptation of dopamine substituting compounds is required throughout the disease course due to the progress of neurodegeneration. Therapeutic drug monitoring of dopamine substituting drugs may be an essential tool to optimize drug applications. We suggest plasma determination of levodopa as an initial step. The complex pharmacology of levodopa is influenced by its short elimination half-life and the gastric emptying velocity. Both considerably contribute to the observed variability of plasma concentrations of levodopa and its metabolite 3-O-methyldopa. These amino acids compete with other aromatic amino acids as well as branched chain amino acids on the limited transport capacity in the gastrointestinal tract and the blood brain barrier. However, not much is known about plasma concentrations of levodopa and other drugs/drug combinations in PD. Some examples may illustrate this lack of knowledge: Levodopa measurements may allow further insights in the phenomenon of inappropriate levodopa response. They may result from missing compliance, interactions e.g. with treatments for other mainly age-related disorders, like hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidaemia, rheumatism or by patients themselves independently taken herbal medicines. Indeed, uncontrolled combination of compounds for accompanying disorders as given above with PD drugs might increase the risk of side effects. Determination of other drugs used to treat PD in plasma such as dopamine receptor agonists, amantadine and inhibitors of catechol-O-methyltransferase or monoamine oxidase B may refine and improve the value of calculations of levodopa equivalents. How COMT-Is change levodopa plasma concentrations? How other dopaminergic and non-dopaminergic drugs influence levodopa levels? Also, delivery of drugs as well as single and repeated dosing and continuous levodopa administrations with a possible accumulation of levodopa, pharmacokinetic behaviour of generic and branded compounds appear to have a marked influence on efficacy of drug treatment and side effect profile. Their increase over time may reflect progression of PD to a certain degree. Therapeutic drug monitoring in PD is considered to improve the therapeutic efficacy in the course of this devastating neurologic disorder and therefore is able to contribute to the patients' precision medicine. State-of-the-art clinical studies are urgently needed to demonstrate the usefulness of TDM for optimizing the treatment of PD.

Molecular Variability in Levodopa Absorption and Clinical Implications for the Management of Parkinson's Disease.

Levodopa is the most widely used medication for the symptomatic treatment of Parkinson's disease and, despite being an "old" drug, is still considered the gold standard for offering symptomatic relief. The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamics of levodopa have been studied extensively. Our review explores the molecular mechanisms that affect the absorption of this drug, focusing on the large intra- and interindividual variability of absorption that is commonly encountered in daily clinical practice, and on the interaction with other medications. In addition, we will explore the clinical implications of levodopa absorption variability and address current and future strategies for researchers and clinicians.

Does Delaying Levodopa Prevent Motor Complications in Parkinson's Disease? A Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: There has been a long debate whether delaying treatment with levodopa prevents motor complications in Parkinson's disease (PD). OBJECTIVES: We performed a meta-analysis on randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that compared early- versus delayed-start treatment with levodopa in PD. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases from inception to July 1, 2023. Only RCTs that compared early and delayed levodopa treatment in PD were included. Non-randomized comparisons from follow-up studies were included as well. Our primary outcomes were occurrence of overall motor complications, motor fluctuations, and dyskinesias. RESULTS: Seven studies with a total of 1149 patients (636 in the early-start group and 513 in the delayed-start) were included in our analysis. There was no difference between groups regarding motor complications (OR 1.39; 95% CI: 0.68-1.72; P = 0.37) or dyskinesias (OR 1.52; 95% CI: 0.90-2.57; P = 0.11). Motor fluctuations occurred less frequently in the early-start group (OR 0.70; 95% CI: 0.52-0.95; P = 0.02). Nonetheless, on subgroup analysis of dopamine agonists, rate of dyskinesias was smaller in the delayed-start group (OR 1.82; 95% CI: 1.08-3.07; P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Delaying treatment with levodopa does not seem to prevent levodopa-related motor complications in PD. Adjunct treatment with dopamine agonists may reduce the need for higher doses of levodopa and thus reduce the risk for dyskinesias but this practice is often associated with a higher frequency of adverse effects related to dopamine agonists.

Levodopa-induced dyskinesia: brain iron deposition as a new hypothesis.

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a common neurodegenerative disease in the older adults. The main pathological change in PD is the degenerative death of dopamine (DA) neurons in the midbrain substantia nigra, which causes a significant decrease in the DA content of the striatum. However, the exact etiology of this pathological change remains unclear. Genetic factors, environmental factors, aging, and oxidative stress may be involved in the degenerative death of dopaminergic neurons in PD. Pharmacological treatment using levodopa (L-DOPA) remains the main treatment for PD. Most patients with PD consuming L-DOPA for a long time usually develop levodopa-induced dyskinesia (LID) after 6.5 years of use, and LID seriously affects the quality of life and increases the risk of disability. Recently, studies have revealed that cerebral iron deposition may be involved in LID development and that iron deposition has neurotoxic effects and accelerates disease onset. However, the relationship between cerebral iron deposition and LID remains unclear. Herein, we reviewed the mechanisms by which iron deposition may be associated with LID development, which are mainly related to oxidative stress, neuroinflammation, and mitochondrial and lysosomal dysfunction. Using iron as an important target, the search and development of safe and effective brain iron scavengers, and thus the alleviation and treatment of LID, has a very important scientific and clinical value, as well as a good application prospect.

Levodopa Equivalent Daily Dosage: Geographical Variations and Real-Life Modules in Parkinson's Disease.

BACKGROUND: The Levodopa Equivalent Daily Dosage (LEDD) calculation algorithms help in capturing and harmonization of Parkinson's Disease (PD) therapies. Analyzing these updates is essential for validating their effectiveness. OBJECTIVE: To assess updated LEDD conversion factors in capturing the newer therapies in PD and therapy modules in different geographical cohorts. METHODS: Data were sourced from 10 Centers from 6 countries representing 2 different continents. The study compared the LEDD conversion factors proposed by Tomlinson et al and Jost et al, alongside investigating demographic disparities. RESULTS: The analysis involved 2943 subjects; 87% (n = 2577) met the UK Brain Bank criteria for PD. The LEDD differed significantly across methodologies (Tomlinson vs. Jost, 598 mg vs 610 mg, P < 0.0001). Geographical disparities highlighted variations in PD onset age (P < 0.0001). Jost and Tomlinson's calculations demonstrated consistency within but significant differences across countries (P < 0.0001).Age at onset revealed statistically significant differences in LEDD requirements (P < 0.0001), which were particularly higher in 21-50 years (718 mg vs 566 mg). This subgroup also demonstrated increased usage of non-Levodopa therapies (P < 0.0001). Men exhibited higher total LEDD (P = 0.001). 34% reported dyskinesia, associated with higher LEDD (756 mg, P < 0.0001). Surgically treated patients also had higher LEDD (P < 0.0001) and a significant difference between Jost and Tomlinson dosages (761 mg vs716mg) reflecting the incorporation of newer therapeutic molecules. CONCLUSION: This analysis delineates the importance of updated LEDD algorithms and intricacies in the landscape of PD treatment, underscored by geographical, age-related, and gender-specific variations, in real-life management scenarios.

Effects of Mucuna pruriens (L.) DC. and Levodopa in Improving Parkinson's Disease in Rotenone Intoxicated Mice.

Parkinson's disease (PD) is the second leading neurodegenerative disease after Alzheimer's disease. Mucuna pruriens (L.) DC. (MP) is a plant that contains Levodopa (L-DOPA) and has been known to improve the symptoms of PD. In this preliminary study, we investigated the anti-parkinsonian potential of MP to compare the effects of L-DOPA. We first developed an in vivo model of the PD in C57BL/6 male mice using rotenone. A total of twelve mice were used for this experiment. Nine mice were injected with rotenone (28 mg/kg) daily for 28 days. The mice experiments were performed to validate the effectiveness of MP to treat PD. Synthetic L-DOPA in a ratio of 1:20 with MP was used as MP contains 5% L-DOPA by weight in it. MP and L-DOPA were injected for 19 days on a daily basis. Cognitive function was evaluated using beam balance and olfactory tests. Serum analysis was performed using serum enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) analysis test. IL-12, IL-6, and TGF-ß 1 were evaluated to validate the PD inducement and treatment. The levels of IL-12, IL-6, and TGF-ß1 (p < 0.0001) in the PD mice group were significantly higher than those in the control group. The PD mice also showed higher latencies in beam balance and olfactory tests (p < 0.0001) compared to the control group. Both MP and L-DOPA-treated groups showed alleviation in latencies in beam balance and olfactory tests and decreased neuroinflammation in ELISA analysis (p < 0.001). The results treated by MP and L-DOPA showed insignificant differences in their values (p > 0.05). This proved that the MP and L-DOPA had similar effects in improving the symptoms of PD when used in the ratio of 1:20. Furthermore, both MP and L-DOPA reduced the level of IL-6 and TGF-ß1 in this study. It may be inferred that a reduction in the level of IL-6 and TGF-ß1 eventually leads to a reduction in the Th17 cells. The pathogenic Th17 is thought to be present in virtually all chronic inflammatory disorders. This can be an interesting area of research in further understanding the immunological effect of MP in ameliorating PD symptoms.

Precision Dopaminergic Treatment in a Cohort of Parkinson's Disease Patients Carrying Autosomal Recessive Gene Variants: Clinical Cohort Data and a Mini Review.

INTRODUCTION: Parkinson's disease (PD) patients harboring recessive gene variants exhibit a distinct clinical phenotype with an early disease onset and relatively mild symptoms. Data concerning individualized therapy for autosomal recessive PD forms are still scarce. METHODS: Demographic and treatment data of a cohort of PD carriers of recessive genes (nine homozygous or compound heterozygous PRKN carriers, four heterozygous PRKN carriers, and three biallelic PINK1 carriers) were evaluated. RESULTS: The average levodopa equivalent daily dose (LEDD) was 806.8 ± 453.5 (range 152-1810) in PRKN carriers and 765 ± 96.6 (range 660-850) in PINK1 carriers. The majority responded to low/moderate doses of levodopa. The response to dopamine agonists (DAs) was often favorable both as initial and longitudinal therapy. In total, 8/13 PRKN and 1/3 PINK1 carriers were treated with amantadine successfully, and this also applied to patients who could not tolerate levodopa or DAs. CONCLUSIONS: In the era of personalized treatment, the therapeutic approach in recessive PD gene carriers might differ as compared to idiopathic PD. Lower LEDD doses were efficient even in patients with a very long disease duration, while a few patients were doing well without any levodopa treatment decades after disease initiation. DAs or amantadine could be used as a first and main line treatment regimen if well tolerated. Literature data on therapeutic strategies in carriers of pathogenic mutations in recessive PD genes, including device-aided treatments, will be further discussed.

Remote levodopa challenge test in Parkinson's disease: Feasibility, reliability, validity and economic value.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The aim was to demonstrate the feasibility, reliability and validity of an in-home remote levodopa challenge test (LCT), as delivered through an online platform, for patients with Parkinson's disease (PwPD). METHODS: Patients with Parkinson's disease eligible for deep brain stimulation surgery screening were enrolled. Participants sequentially received an in-home remote LCT and an in-hospital standard LCT (separated by 2.71 weeks). A modified Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part III omitting rigidity and postural stability items was used in the remote LCT. The reliability of the remote LCT was evaluated using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the concurrent validity was evaluated using the Pearson's correlation coefficient r between the levodopa responsiveness of the remote and standard LCT. RESULTS: Out of 106 PwPD screened, 80 (75.5%) completed both the remote and standard LCT. There was a good reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.81, 95% confidence interval 0.69-0.88) and a strong correlation (r = 0.84, 95% confidence interval 0.77-0.90) between the levodopa responsiveness of the remote and standard LCT. The mean cost for PwPD was estimated to be reduced by 91% by using the remote LCT. CONCLUSION: The remote LCT is feasible, reliable and valid and may reduce healthcare-related costs for PwPD and their caregivers.

Coadministration of 6-Shogaol and Levodopa Alleviates Parkinson's Disease-Related Pathology in Mice.

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disease caused by the death of dopaminergic neurons in the nigrostriatal pathway, leading to motor and non-motor dysfunctions, such as depression, olfactory dysfunction, and memory impairment. Although levodopa (L-dopa) has been the gold standard PD treatment for decades, it only relieves motor symptoms and has no effect on non-motor symptoms or disease progression. Prior studies have reported that 6-shogaol, the active ingredient in ginger, exerts a protective effect on dopaminergic neurons by suppressing neuroinflammation in PD mice. This study investigated whether cotreatment with 6-shogaol and L-dopa could attenuate both motor and non-motor symptoms and dopaminergic neuronal damage. Both 6-shogaol (20 mg/kg) and L-dopa (80 mg/kg) were orally administered to 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine/probenecid- induced PD model mice for 26 days. The experimental results showed that L-dopa alleviated motor symptoms, but had no significant effect on non-motor symptoms, loss of dopaminergic neuron, or neuroinflammation. However, when mice were treated with 6-shogaol alone or in combination L-dopa, an amelioration in both motor and non-motor symptoms such as depression-like behavior, olfactory dysfunction and memory impairment was observed. Moreover, 6-shogaol-only or co-treatment with 6-shogaol and L-dopa protected dopaminergic neurons in the striatum and reduced neuroinflammation in the striatum and substantia nigra. Overall, these results suggest that 6-shogaol can effectively complement L-dopa by improving non-motor dysfunction and restoring dopaminergic neurons via suppressing neuroinflammation.