Right hepatic arterial girdle around the common hepatic duct in liver donors: technical considerations for successful living donor liver transplantation.

PURPOSE: Variations in hepatic arterial anatomy can result in multiple arterial trunks in the graft liver. We describe our experience in dealing with five right lobe liver donors where in the right hepatic artery (RHA) branches were passing anterior and posterior to the common hepatic duct (CHD) forming an arterial girdle around it. METHODS: Five of 771 right lobe living donor liver transplants (January 2012 and March 2020) demonstrated the RHA girdle around the CHD. Three patients had the typical girdle resulting in two graft arteries which were reconstructed using arterial Y grafts. Arterial girdle was formed by the right anterior hepatic artery branches in one patient resulting in 3 graft arteries of which two were reconstructed using a Y graft. One donor had the arterial girdle and an accessory artery from SMA giving rise to 3 graft arteries. Two of them were ligated (brisk back bleed), and one was reconstructed. RESULTS: All donors (median follow-up 17 months, range 6-60 months) had an uneventful postoperative recovery. No vascular or biliary complications were encountered in the recipients. One recipient died due to sepsis and multiorgan failure, while the other 4 recipients recovered uneventfully and continue to have stable graft function. CONCLUSION: Adhering to safe surgical principles during RHA mobilization, ligation of minor arterial branches, and precise reconstruction of multiple major branches can ensure successful outcomes in the donor and recipient in this scenario.

"No go" donor hepatectomy in living-donor liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Selection of appropriate donors after rigorous evaluation is of paramount importance in living-donor liver transplantation. Despite this, donor surgery may not proceed due to unforeseen reasons. The aim of this paper is to study reasons for "no go" donor hepatectomy in living liver donors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Donor operations stopped after surgical start, directly due to donor safety-related reasons, qualified for inclusion as "no go" donor hepatectomy. Living-donor evaluation was performed as per standard protocol. Data for consecutive living liver donors operated between April 2012 and November 2016 were analyzed to evaluate reasons for "no go" donor hepatectomy in a liver transplantation unit at a tertiary care teaching hospital. RESULTS: In 307 donors, the operation was aborted in 7 (2.3 %). One patient had unexpected biliary pathology with fibrosis found intraoperatively. Operations in five donors were abandoned in view of liver parenchymal abnormalities (fibrosis/steatohepatitis). One donor had hemodynamically significant bradycardia after handling the round ligament. All these donors recovered uneventfully and remained well on follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: "No go" donor hepatectomy remains a real possibility despite rigorous assessment. Although thresholds for on-table rejection of the donor after complete evaluation vary, "no go" hepatectomy is a calculated risk-avoidance approach.