In silico medical device testing of anatomically and mechanically conforming patient-specific spinal fusion cages designed by full-scale topology optimisation.

A full-scale topology optimisation formulation has been developed to automate the design of cages used in instrumented transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. The method incorporates the mechanical response of the adjacent bone structures in the optimisation process, yielding patient-specific spinal fusion cages that both anatomically and mechanically conform to the patient, effectively mitigating subsidence risk compared to generic, off-the-shelf cages and patient-specific devices. In this study, in silico medical device testing on a cohort of seven patients was performed to investigate the effectiveness of the anatomically and mechanically conforming devices using titanium and PEEK implant materials. A median reduction in the subsidence risk by 89% for titanium and 94% for PEEK implant materials was demonstrated compared to an off-the-shelf implant. A median reduction of 75% was achieved for a PEEK implant material compared to an anatomically conforming implant. A credibility assessment of the computational model used to predict the subsidence risk was provided according to the ASME V&V40-2018 standard.

Effectiveness of Interspinous Process Devices in Managing Adjacent Segment Degeneration Following Lumbar Spinal Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: Adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) is a significant complication following lumbar spinal fusion, often necessitating further surgical interventions and impairing patient outcomes. Interspinous process devices were introduced as an alternative treatment for spinal stenosis and degenerative spondylolisthesis and can potentially reduce the incidence of ASDd. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the effectiveness of interspinous process devices or IPDs in managing ASD following a previous spinal fusion compared to traditional fusion techniques. Methods: Electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library, were queried for studies assessing IPDs against traditional lumbar fusion methods for managing ASD after previous lumbar fusion, which had been published between January 2014 and the present. Statistical analysis was conducted using Review Manager 5.4. Results: Seven retrospective cohort studies involving 546 patients met the inclusion criteria. The analysis revealed that IPDs were associated with a statistically significant reduction in the incidence of ASD (OR = 0.28, 95% CI: 0.16 to 0.51, p < 0.0001, and I2 = 0% after excluding outliers). The ODI demonstrated a non-significant trend towards improved outcomes with IPDs at the 2-year follow-up (SMD = -3.94; 95% CI: -11.72 to 3.85). Range of motion (ROM) was better preserved with IPDs compared to fusion (SMD = 0.00, 95% CI: -0.41 to 0.41, p = 1.00, I2 = 60%). The visual analogue scale or VAS lower back pain scores were significantly reduced at the 2-year follow-up (SMD = -0.69, 95% CI: -1.18 to -0.19, p = 0.006, and I2 = 74%). VAS leg pain showed consistent improvements (SMD = -0.29; 95% CI: -0.63 to 0.04). Intraoperative blood loss was significantly lower with IPDs (SMD = -2.07; 95% CI: -3.27 to -0.87, p = 0.0007, and I2 = 95%), and operation times were shorter (SMD = -2.22, 95% CI: -3.31 to -1.12, p < 0.0001, and I2 = 94%). Conclusions: The judicious use of IPDs might benefit a subset of patients, particularly those who are not suitable candidates for major corrective surgery.

Ceramic substitutes, failure to achieve solid fusion in posterolateral instrumented fusion: a surgical and histological evaluation.

PURPOSE: As the number of instrumented fusions increases, so does the utilization of bone substitutes. However, controversies persist regarding the effectiveness of ceramics in promoting solid fusion. Few histological studies have been conducted on patients to address this issue. To contribute insights into this topic, we assessed bony fusion both intraoperatively and histologically in patients who underwent posterolateral instrumented fusions enhanced with a biphasic ceramic compound. METHODS: We analyzed a series of 13 patients who underwent revision surgery due to adjacent segment disease following the initial use of ceramics as bone extenders in the index surgery. In each case, patients exhibited apparent radiological fusion in the instrumented posterolateral fusions. Follow-up exceeded 18 months. Bone fusion was assessed intraoperatively, and biopsies of the bone mass at the intertransverse area were examined under an optical microscope. RESULTS: Surgical exploration of the fusion block at the intertransverse space did not indicate solid fusion. Moreover, histological analysis of the 13 biopsies revealed a lack of proper integration of the bone substitutes, incomplete resorption of hydroxyapatite granules, and substitution of ceramic particles by immature fibrous tissue lacking the structural competence to bear loads or add stability to spinal fusion. CONCLUSION: The utilization of biphasic ceramics proved ineffective in attaining a proper fusion mass between the intertransverse space. Both surgical inspection and histological studies confirmed the absence of integration. Prudence should be exercised regarding the use of ceramics. While no clear instability was observed, neither was there any integration.

Prolonged opioid use after single-level lumbar spinal fusion surgery in a Belgian population: a multicentric observational study.

PURPOSE: Lumbar spinal fusion surgeries are increasingly being performed in spinal degenerative disease, often accompanied by perioperative opioid prescriptions. The aim of this study is to analyze prolonged postoperative opioid use following a standardized opioid prescription after single-level lumbar spinal fusion surgery in a Belgian population. METHODS: This prospective, multicentric observational study included patients undergoing single-level lumbar fusion surgery for degenerative disease. A standardized postoperative opioid protocol (Targinact 2 × 10 mg/5 mg, Paracetamol 4 × 1 g and Ibuprofen 3 × 600 mg) was applied uniformly. Prolonged opioid use was defined as continued opioid use six months after surgery. Patient data were collected using the Back-App®. RESULTS: Among 198 participants, 32.8% continued opioid use six months post-surgery, with 8% utilizing strong opioids. Prolonged opioid use correlated with lower pre-operative back pain. Patients with prolonged opioid use and strong opioid use at six months show less improvement in disability compared to patients without prolonged opioid use. Moreover, patients with prolonged strong opioid use tend to have lesser improvement of the low back pain. The odds for prolonged opioid use decrease with the increase of the improvement in ODI. CONCLUSION: 1 in 3 patients undergoing single-level lumbar spinal fusion surgery is at risk for prolonged opioid use. The study underscores the importance of tailored pain management strategies, particularly given the rising prevalence of spinal fusion surgeries. The association between pre-operative low back pain, post-operative improvement in functionality (ODI), and prolonged opioid use emphasizes the need for judicious opioid prescribing practices and highlights the role of functional outcomes in treatment goals.

[Effect of intervertebral bone graft area on the effect of single-level posterior lumbar decompression and bone graft fusion].

OBJECTIVE: To study the effect of intervertebral grafting area on the effect of single segment lumbar posterior decompression and intervertebral bone grafting fusion. METHODS: The clinical data of 52 patients who underwent single-segment lumbar posterior decompression pedicle internal fixation and bone grafting fusion from January 2020 to December 2022 were retrospective reviewed. The area of the intervertebral bone graft was measured one week postoperatively using Computed Tomography (CT), and based on the ratio of the bone graft area to the average area of the endplates, the patients were divided into three groups:17 cases in group A(the intervertebral bone graft area did not exceed the area of one pedicle) included 9 males and 8 females with an average age of (56.0±11.5) years old;15 cases in group B(the intervertebral bone graft area exceeded one pedicle but did not reach the opposite pedicle) included 10 males and 5 females with an average of (52.0±14.0) years old; 20 cases in group C (the intervertebral bone graft area exceeded the opposite pedicle) included 12 males and 8 females with an average of (49.5±12.8) years old. X-rays and CT scans were performed at 3, 6, 12 months, and the final follow-up postoperatively, the interbody fusion Brantigan scores, pain visual analogue scale (VAS), and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) at each follow-up were recorded. RESULTS: The gender, age, and surgical segments showed no significant differences among three groups(P>0.05). There was also no significant difference in the preoperative VAS and ODI among three groups (P>0.05). All patients of three groups were followed up from 12 to 36 months. Compared with preoperative, VAS and ODI scores of three groups showed significant improvement at 1 week postoperatively and the final follow-up (P<0.05). Compared with preoperative measurements, the height of the intervertebral space was restored at 1 week postoperatively in three groups;at the final follow-up, the loss of height in the intervertebral space was less in groups B and C, and the height of the intervertebral space in group B and C was significantly higher than in group A(P<0.05). The modified Brantigan scores at 3 and 6 months postoperatively were significantly higher in group C than in groups A and B (P<0.05);at 12 months postoperatively, the scores in groups B and C were significantly higher than in group A(P<0.05);however, at the final follow-up, there was no significant difference in the modified Brantigan scores among three groups(P>0.05). The bone graft fusion rate in group C was significantly higher than in groups A and B at 3 months postoperatively(P<0.05);at 6 and 12 months postoperatively, the fusion rates in groups B and C were significantly higher than in group A(P<0.05);at the final follow-up, the fusion rate in group A was still lower than in groups B and C, but the difference among three groups was not significant(P>0.05). CONCLUSION: Single segment posterior lumbar decompression and interbody fusion surgery can significantly improve the clinical symptoms of patients with lumbar degenerative related diseases. However, as the proportion of bone grafting area increases, the early bone grafting fusion rate and fusion score of patients are significantly improved.

Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Postoperative Infection Rates of Blood Transfusion in Lumbar Spinal Fusion Surgery: A Nationwide Population-Based Study.

Study Design: Retrospective cohort study. Objectives: Effects of blood loss that requires blood transfusion after lumbar spinal fusion remain an important issue. Blood transfusions are used commonly in cases of significant blood loss in lumbar spinal fusion but are associated with adverse effects. The objective was to assess the rate of blood transfusion and the associated risk after lumbar spinal fusion from 2013 to 2018. Methods: In this nationwide population-based cohort study, the Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service database was reviewed retrospectively from 2013 to 2018. Data were extracted from patients who underwent lumbar spinal fusion without history of lumbar spinal surgery in the preceding year. The primary outcome was the rate of blood transfusion within 1 week of surgery. In addition, the risk factors for blood transfusion and the rate of postoperative infection were evaluated. Results: A total of 188,581 patients underwent lumbar spinal fusion between 2013 and 2018. A significant decline in blood transfusions was observed during the study period (56.38-47.51%). The presence of comorbidities was associated with an increased risk of blood transfusion. Patients who underwent the posterior approach were more likely to receive blood transfusion than patients who underwent the anterior or anterior and posterior approach. Receiving blood transfusion was associated with postoperative infection. Conclusions: In the present study, the prevalence, risk factors, and postoperative infection rates associated with blood transfusion in lumbar spinal fusion were identified. Spine surgeons should consider these risk factors in patients at high risk of blood transfusion.

The Use of 18F-Fluoride Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Scanning to Identify Sources of Pain after Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion-An Analysis in Patients with and without Symptoms.

BACKGROUND: Identifying the cause of recurrent or persisting pain after posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) is essential for establishing optimal treatment. In this study, we evaluate patients after PLIF surgery by 18F-fluoride PET/CT scans and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). METHODS: A total of 36 PLIF patients were included. Sixty minutes after intravenous injection of 18F-fluoride, PET/CT scanning was performed. Bone graft ingrowth, subsidence, screw loosening and damage of facet joints were scored by quantifying the level of bone metabolism of the vertebral endplates in the disc spaces, around screws and around the facet joints on the PET scans. RESULTS: In contrast to asymptomatic patients, symptomatic patients showed abnormal PET values around pedicle screws and/or facet joints and at the lower endplates of the disc spaces, identifying a possible source of pain. On CT, no significant differences between these two groups were found. CONCLUSION: The PET/CT findings appeared to correlate better with symptoms on PROMs compared to CT findings alone. When interpreting 18F-fluoride PET/CT findings after PLIF surgery, one should realize bone metabolism in the disc spaces of the operated segments and around pedicle screws or facet joint changes during follow-up, reflecting natural recovery.

Surgical vs ultrasound-guided lumbar erector spinae plane block for pain management following lumbar spinal fusion surgery.

PURPOSE: Spinal surgery is associated with severe diffuse pain in the postoperative period. Effective pain management plays an essential role in reducing morbidity and mortality. This study is designed to compare the ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane (ESP) block and surgical infiltrative ESP block for postoperative analgesia management after lumbar spinal fusion surgery. METHODS: The patients who underwent two or three levels of posterior lumbar spinal fusion surgery were randomly allocated into one of three groups with 30 patients each (Group SE = Surgical ESP block; Group UE = ultrasound-guided ESP block; Group C = Controls). The primary aim was to compare postoperative opioid consumption, and the secondary aim was to evaluate postoperative dynamic and static pain scores and the incidence of opioid-related adverse effects. RESULTS: There was a significant difference in terms of opioid consumption, rescue analgesia on demand, and both static and dynamic pain scores between groups at all time periods (p < 0.05). Group SE and Group UE had lower pain scores and consumed fewer opioids than the controls (p < 0.05). However, the Group UE had lower pain scores and opioid consumption than the Group SE. The sedation level of patients was significantly higher in the control group than in the other two groups. Also, nausea was more common in controls than in the other groups. CONCLUSION: While both surgical and ultrasound-guided ESP blocks reduced opioid consumption compared to the controls, the patients who received ultrasound-guided ESP blocks experienced better postsurgical pain relief than those in the other groups (surgical ESP and controls).

Surgical Management of Hip-Spine Syndrome: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

BACKGROUND: Hip-spine syndrome (HSS) was first described in 1983 to describe the symptomatology resulting from concomitant lumbar degenerative stenosis and hip osteoarthritis. Numerous studies have sought to understand the underlying pathology and appropriate management of this syndrome. The purpose of this article is to review the literature for the specific imaging characteristics and the optimal surgical treatment of HSS. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted via an electronic database search through PubMed to identify all publications related to HSS. All publications that contained data on patients who underwent surgical treatment for HSS and reported patient-reported outcome measures or radiographic data were included. Exclusion criteria consisted of publications in a language other than English, review articles, and technique articles. RESULTS: Fifteen articles that focused on the surgical management of HSS were identified. Of these 15 articles, 8 reported radiographic outcomes, with most reporting no significant change in spinopelvic parameters before and after surgery. Thirteen articles reported clinical outcomes, with 8 of those 13 articles identifying patient-reported outcome measures to be significantly improved following surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The data on the surgical management of HSS remains sparse. While there is some evidence that total hip arthroplasty in patients who previously underwent spinal fusion may have higher complication rates, there remains debate regarding which surgical problem to address first, the hip or the spine.

The effects of psychological distress after surgery in patients undergoing lumbar spinal fusion.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the psychological distress pre-operatively, at 3, 6, and 12 months in patients who underwent lumbar spine fusion surgery. METHODS: A total of 440 patients received instrumented lumbar spine fusion were enrolled. Psychological distress was evaluated using the Modified Somatic Perception Questionnaire (MSPQ) and the Modified Zung Depressive Index (ZDI). The results of lumbar fusion surgery were evaluated using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA-29), and the visual analog scale (VAS). RESULTS: Psychological distress was reported among 23% of patients and 7, 5.5, and 4.0% of the patients preoperatively, at 3, 6, and 12 months after lumbar surgery, respectively. The mean MSPQ score decreased from 8.78 (before surgery) to 4.30, 3.52, and 3.43 at 3, 6 and 12 months in after surgery, respectively, in patients with psychological distress patients (p < 0.001). The mean ZDI score decreased from 17.78 to 12.48, 10.35, and 9.61 (p < 0.001). The mean ODI score decreased from 22.91 to 11.78, 10.13, and 9.96 (P < 0.001). The mean JOA score increased from 13.65 to 22.30, 23.43, and 23.61 (P < 0.001). The mean low back pain (LBP) VAS score decreased from 4.48 to 1.96, 1.52, and 1.51 (P < 0.001); moreover, the mean leg pain (LP) VAS score decreased from 5.30 to 1.30, 1.04, and 1.03 (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with psychological distress may experience surgical intervention benefits equal to those of ordinary patients. Moreover, reduced pain and disability after surgical intervention may also alleviate psychological distress. Hence, we highly recommend that patients with psychological distress undergo surgical intervention as normal patients do, but appropriate screening measures and interventions are necessary.

Preoperative Resilience and Improvement in Patient-Reported Outcomes After Lumbar Spinal Fusion.

BACKGROUND: It is incompletely understood how preoperative resilience affects 1-year postoperative outcomes after lumbar spinal fusion. METHODS: Patients undergoing open lumbar spinal fusion at a single-center institution were identified between November 2019 and September 2022. Preoperative resilience was assessed using the Brief Resilience Scale. Demographic data at baseline including age, gender, comorbidities, and body mass index (BMI) were extracted. Patient-reported outcome measures including Oswestry Disability Index, PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) Global Physical Health, PROMIS Global Mental Health (GMH), and EuroQol5 scores were collected before the surgery and at 3 months and 1 year postoperatively. Bivariate correlation was conducted between Brief Resilience Scale scores and outcome measures at 3 months and 1 year postoperatively. RESULTS: Ninety-three patients had baseline and 1 year outcome data. Compared with patients with high resilience, patients in the low-resilience group had a higher percentage of females (69.4% vs. 43.9%; P = 0.02), a higher BMI (32.7 vs. 30.1; P = 0.03), and lower preoperative Global Physical Health (35.8 vs. 38.9; P = 0.045), GMH (42.2 vs. 49.2; P < 0.001), and EuroQol scores (0.56 vs. 0.61; P = 0.01). At 3 months postoperatively, resilience was moderately correlated with GMH (r = 0.39) and EuroQol (r = 0.32). Similarly, at 1 year postoperatively, resilience was moderately correlated with GMH (r = 0.33) and EuroQol (r = 0.34). Comparable results were seen in multivariable regression analysis controlling for age, gender, number of levels fused, BMI, Charlson Comorbidity Index, procedure, anxiety/depression, and complications. CONCLUSIONS: Low preoperative resilience can negatively affect patient-reported outcomes 1 year after lumbar spinal fusion. Resiliency is a potentially modifiable risk factor, and surgeons should consider targeted interventions for at-risk patient groups.

Does Surgical Approach Affect Dislocation Rate After Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients Who Have Prior Lumbar Spinal Fusion? A Retrospective Analysis of 16,223 Cases.

BACKGROUND: Lumbar spinal fusion (LSF) is a risk factor for dislocation following total hip arthroplasty (THA). The effect of the surgical approach on this association has not been investigated. This study examined the association between the surgical approach and dislocation following THA in patients who had prior LSF. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 16,223 primary elective THAs at our institution from June 2011 to September 2022. Patients who had LSF prior to THA were identified using International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes. Patients were stratified by LSF history, surgical approach, and intraoperative robot or navigation use to compare dislocation rates. There were 8,962 (55.2%) posterior, 5,971 (36.8%) anterior, and 1,290 (8.0%) laterally based THAs. Prior LSF was identified in 323 patients (2.0%). Binary logistic regressions were used to assess the association of patient factors with dislocation risk. RESULTS: There were 177 dislocations identified in total (1.1%). In nonadjusted analyses, the dislocation rate was significantly higher following the posterior approach among all patients (P = .003). Prior LSF was associated with a significantly higher dislocation rate in all patients (P < .001) and within the posterior (P < .001), but not the anterior approach (P = .514) subgroups. Multivariate regressions demonstrated anterior (OR [odds ratio] = 0.64, 95% CI [confidence interval] 0.45 to 0.91, P = .013), and laterally based (OR = 0.42, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.96, P = .039) approaches were associated with decreased dislocation risk, whereas prior LSF (OR = 4.28, 95% CI 2.38 to 7.69, P < .001) was associated with increased dislocation risk. Intraoperative technology utilization was not significantly associated with dislocation in the multivariate regressions (OR = 0.72, 95% CI 0.49 to 1.06, P = .095). CONCLUSIONS: The current study confirmed that LSF is a significant risk factor for dislocation following THA; however, anterior and laterally based approaches may mitigate dislocation risk in this population. In multivariate analyses, including surgical approach, LSF, and several perioperative variables, intraoperative technology utilization was not found to be significantly associated with dislocation risk.

Efficacy of erector spine plane block in two different approaches to lumbar spinal fusion surgery: a retrospective pilot study.

Background: Erector spine plane block (ESPB) has been widely used in spinal surgery, although there are variable data about its efficacy. Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of ESPB in elective lumbar spinal fusion surgery patients with two different surgical approaches. Materials and methods: Retrospectively, 45 elective lumbar transpedicular fusion (TPF) surgery patients undergoing open surgery with different approaches [posterior transforaminal fusion approach (TLIF) or combined posterior and anterior approach (TLIF+ALIF)] were divided into 2 groups: general anesthesia (GA, n = 24) and general anesthesia combined with ESPB (GA + ESPB, n = 21). The primary outcome was to analyze the efficacy of ESPB in two different surgical approaches in terms of pain intensity in the first 48 h. Secondary: Fentanyl-free patients and opioid consumption in the first 24 h postoperatively. Comparative analysis was performed (SPSS® v. 28.0) (p < 0.05). Results: Out of 45 patients (27 female), 21 received GA + ESPB and 24 received GA. The average age was 60.3 ± 14.3 years. Chronic back pain before the operation was registered in 56% of patients. ESPB was performed in 17 TLIF and in 4 TLIF+ALIF patients. ESPB significantly reduced pain intensity at rest in both surgical approaches 48 h after surgery (p < 0.05). The need for postoperative fentanyl infusion was significantly lower in the group treated with GA + ESPB in both surgical approaches than in those who only received GA (29% vs. 77% in TLIF and 0% vs. 80% in TLIF+ALIF); p = 0.01 and p = 0.004. Additionally, we observed that ESPB provides a good analgesic effect for up to 6.8 ± 3.2 h in the TLIF and 8.9 ± 7.6 h in the TLIF+ALIF approaches. Consequently, ESPB reduced the initiation of the fentanyl compared to GA alone, with a mean difference of 3.2 ± 4.2 h in the TLIF subgroup (p = 0.045) and 6.7 ± 5.3 h in TLIF +ALIF (p = 0.028). Only in the TLIF+ALIF approach, ESPB reduced the total fentanyl consumption compared to those with GA (1.43 ± 0.45 mg/24 h vs. 0.93 ± 0.68 mg/24 h; p = 0.015). Conclusion: ESPB significantly reduced pain at rest after surgery, the number of patients requiring immediate postoperative fentanyl analgesia, and total fentanyl consumption in both surgical approaches, particularly in TLIF+ALIF. However, the application of ESPB does not always provide completely sufficient analgesia.

The efficacy of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB) versus freehand ESPB in postoperative pain management after lumbar spinal fusion surgery: a randomized, non-inferiority trial.

PURPOSE: Spine surgeries have experienced exponential growth over the past 2 decades. These surgeries are often accompanied by long and severe perioperative pain, presenting a significant management challenge. This study aims to assess and compare the efficacy of two techniques for postoperative pain (POP) management in lumbar spine surgeries: ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB) and intraoperative freehand ESPB. METHODS: In this prospective randomized non-inferiority trial (Registration Number: IRCT20221107056427N1), adult patients who were candidates for lumbar spinal fusion surgery were randomly divided into two groups: ultrasound-guided ESPB (n = 29) and freehand ESPB (n = 29). The primary outcomes were the total amount of morphine consumed during the first 24 h following the surgery and the numerical rating scale (NRS) pain score at various time points within the first 24 h following the surgery. The secondary outcome was the fentanyl used during surgery. RESULTS: Participants in the intraoperative freehand approach had considerably higher total morphine consumption in the first postoperative 24 h. The trend of NRS changes in both the ultrasound-guided ESPB group and the freehand ESPB group during the first 24 h after surgery showed a significant decrease. Still, there was no significant difference between the two groups. However, the first analgesic demand time was significantly shorter in the intraoperative freehand ESPB group compared to the ultrasound-guided approach. CONCLUSION: According to our results, the ultrasound-guided approach of ESPB is more effective in POP management and opioid sparing in lumbar spinal fusion surgeries compared to the freehand approach. However, the data from this study are not sufficient to draw robust conclusions, and further randomized controlled trials with larger sample sizes are required to validate our results.

Day one versus day zero postoperative physical therapy among patients with lumbar spinal fusion: a length of stay comparison.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Postoperative physical therapy (PT) following lumbar spinal fusion is an effective form of postoperative rehabilitation. However, it is unknown when a postoperative PT protocol should be optimally initiated. PURPOSE: This study sought to compare lengths of stay between patients on a day zero PT protocol and those on a day one PT protocol. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Retrospective chart review. PATIENT SAMPLE: Patients who underwent lumbar spinal surgery at a large midwestern tertiary medical care center from January 1, 2018 through April 30, 2019 were eligible for their medical record's inclusion. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE: Length of hospital stay following surgery. METHODS: Patients were stratified by having started postoperative PT on the same day as surgery (day zero) or having started postoperative PT on the day following surgery (day one). RESULTS: A total of 164 patients were included in the study, 69 in the day zero group and 95 patients in the day one group. Most patients were female (59%, n = 98), and patients' average age was 62 years (SD = 13). Average length of stay was 61 hours (SD = 20) for those on the day zero protocol and 75 hours (SD = 32) for those on the day one protocol. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that a postoperative physical therapy protocol initiated on day zero is associated with patients experiencing a shorter length of hospital stay compared to a similar PT protocol initiated on postoperative day one.

Patients Requiring Both Total Hip Arthroplasty and Lumbar Spinal Fusion Have Lower Hip Functional Outcome Scores: A Matched Case-Control Study.

BACKGROUND: While patients who undergo both lumbar spinal fusion (LSF) and total hip arthroplasty (THA) have increased complication rates compared to patients who have not undergone LSF, there is a paucity of literature evaluating THA functional outcomes in patients with a history of LSF. This study was conducted to determine whether patients undergoing THA with a history of LSF have inferior functional outcomes compared to patients having no history of LSF. METHODS: A retrospective matched case-control study was conducted at an academic center. Patients who underwent both THA and LSF (cases) were matched with controls who underwent THA without LSF. Inclusion criteria required a minimum of 1-year follow-up for the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Joint Replacement [HOOS-JR]. Following propensity matching for age, sex, race, body mass index, and comorbidities, 291 cases and 1,164 controls were included, with no demographic differences. RESULTS: Patients who underwent both THA and LSF had a significantly lower preoperative HOOS-JR (47 versus 50; P < .001), postoperative HOOS-JR (77 versus 85; P < .001), a significant lower rate of achieving the patient acceptable symptom state (55 versus 67%; P < .001), with no significant difference in delta HOOS-JR (34 versus 34; P = .834). When comparing patients undergoing THA before LSF or LSF before THA, no differences existed for preoperative HOOS-JR (50 versus 47; P = .304), but patients undergoing THA before LSF had lower postoperative HOOS-JR scores (74 versus 81; P = .034), a lower-delta HOOS-JR (27 versus 35; P = .022), and a lower rate of reaching the HOOS-JR minimal clinically important difference (62 versus 76%; P = .031). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who have a history of LSF experience a similar improvement in hip function when undergoing THA compared to patients who do not have a history of LSF. However, due to lower preoperative function, they may have a lower postoperative functional outcome ceiling. Additionally, patients undergoing THA before LSF have worse hip functional outcomes than patients undergoing LSF before THA.

Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Stimulation in Lumbar Spine Fusion for Patients With Risk Factors for Pseudarthrosis.

BACKGROUND: Lumbar spinal fusion surgeries are increasing steadily due to an aging and ever-growing population. Patients undergoing lumbar spinal fusion surgery may present with risk factors that contribute to complications, pseudarthrosis, prolonged pain, and reduced quality of life. Pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) stimulation represents an adjunct noninvasive treatment intervention that has been shown to improve successful fusion and patient outcomes following spinal surgery. METHODS: A prospective, multicenter study investigated PEMF as an adjunct therapy to lumbar spinal fusion procedures in patients at risk for pseudarthrosis. Patients with at least 1 of the following risk factors were enrolled: prior failed fusion, multilevel fusion, nicotine use, osteoporosis, or diabetes. Fusion status was determined by radiographic imaging, and patient-reported outcomes were also evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 142 patients were included in the analysis. Fusion status was assessed at 12 months follow-up where 88.0% (n = 125/142) of patients demonstrated successful fusion. Fusion success for patients with 1, 2+, or 3+ risk factors was 88.5%, 87.5%, and 82.3%, respectively. Significant improvements in patient-reported outcomes using the Short Form 36, EuroQol 5 Dimension (EQ-5D) survey, Oswestry Disability Index, and visual analog scale for back and leg pain were also observed compared with baseline scores (P < 0.001). A favorable safety profile was observed. PEMF treatment showed a positive benefit-risk profile throughout the 6-month required use period. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of PEMF as an adjunct treatment in patients undergoing lumbar spinal surgery provided a high rate of successful fusion with significant improvements in pain, function, and quality of life, despite having risk factors for pseudarthrosis. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: PEMF represents a useful tool for adjunct treatment in patients who have undergone lumbar spinal surgery. Treatment with PEMF may result in improved fusion and patient-reported outcomes, regardless of risk factors. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03176303.

Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: review of current classifications and proposal of a novel classification system.

PURPOSE: To review existing classification systems for degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS), propose a novel classification designed to better address clinically relevant radiographic and clinical features of disease, and determine the inter- and intraobserver reliability of this new system for classifying DS. METHODS: The proposed classification system includes four components: 1) segmental dynamic instability, 2) location of spinal stenosis, 3) sagittal alignment, and 4) primary clinical presentation. To establish the reliability of this system, 12 observers graded 10 premarked test cases twice each. Kappa values were calculated to assess the inter- and intraobserver reliability for each of the four components separately. RESULTS: Interobserver reliability for dynamic instability, location of stenosis, sagittal alignment, and clinical presentation was 0.94, 0.80, 0.87, and 1.00, respectively. Intraobserver reliability for dynamic instability, location of stenosis, sagittal alignment, and clinical presentation were 0.91, 0.88, 0.87, and 0.97, respectively. CONCLUSION: The UCSF DS classification system provides a novel framework for assessing DS based on radiographic and clinical parameters with established implications for surgical treatment. The almost perfect interobserver and intraobserver reliability observed for all components of this system demonstrates that it is simple and easy to use. In clinical practice, this classification may allow subclassification of similar patients into groups that may benefit from distinct treatment strategies, leading to the development of algorithms to help guide selection of an optimal surgical approach. Future work will focus on the clinical validation of this system, with the goal of providing for more evidence-based, standardized approaches to treatment and improved outcomes for patients with DS.