Multidisciplinary Velopharyngeal Dysfunction Evaluation Helps Detect Non-classic Cases of 22q11.2 Deletion.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the role of multidisciplinary velopharyngeal dysfunction (VPD) assessment in diagnosing 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (22q) in children. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Multidisciplinary VPD clinic at a tertiary pediatric hospital. PATIENTS, PARTICIPANTS: Seventy-five children with genetically confirmed 22q evaluated at the VPD clinic between February 2007 and February 2023, including both previously diagnosed patients and those newly diagnosed as a result of VPD evaluation. INTERVENTIONS: Comprehensive review of medical records, utilizing ICD-10 codes and an institutional tool for keyword searches, to identify patients and collect data on clinical variables and outcomes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Characteristics of children with 22q, pathways to diagnosis, and clinical presentations that led to genetic testing for 22q. RESULTS: Of the 75 children, 9 were newly diagnosed with 22q following VPD evaluation. Non-cleft VPI was a significant indicator for 22q in children not previously diagnosed, occurring in 100% of newly diagnosed cases compared to 52% of cases with existing 22q diagnosis (P = .008). Additional clinical findings leading to diagnosis included congenital heart disease, craniofacial abnormalities, and developmental delays. CONCLUSIONS: VPD evaluations, particularly the presence of non-cleft VPI, play a crucial role in identifying undiagnosed cases of 22q. This underscores the need for clinicians, including plastic surgeons, otolaryngologists, and speech-language pathologists, to maintain a high degree of suspicion for 22q in children presenting with VPI without a clear etiology. Multidisciplinary approaches are essential for early diagnosis and management of this complex condition.

Results of comprehensive genetic testing in patients presenting to a multidisciplinary inherited heart disease clinic in India.

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to analyze the results of comprehensive genetic testing in patients presenting to a dedicated multidisciplinary inherited heart disease clinic in India. METHODS: All patients presenting to our clinic from August 2017 to October 2023 with a suspected inherited heart disease and consenting for genetic testing were included. The probands were grouped into familial cardiomyopathies namely hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (ACM) and peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM), channelopathies namely congenital long QT syndrome (LQTS) and Brugada syndrome (BrS), and heritable connective tissue disorder namely Marfan Syndrome (MFS). Next generation sequencing (NGS) was used, and pre-test and post-test counseling were provided to probands and cascade screening offered to relatives. RESULTS: Mean age of the subjects (n = 77; 48 probands, 29 relatives) was 43 ± 18 years, 68 % male and 44 % symptomatic, with 36 HCM, 3 DCM, 3 ACM, 1 PPCM, 3 LQTS, 1 BrS and 1 MFS probands. The diagnostic yield of NGS-based genetic testing was 31 %; variants of uncertain significance (VUS) were identified in 54 %; and 15 % were genotype-negative. Twenty-nine relatives from 18 families with HCM (n = 12), DCM (n = 3), ACM (n = 2) and MFS (n = 1) underwent genetic testing. The genotype positive probands/relatives and VUS carriers with strong disease phenotype and/or high risk variant were advised periodic follow-up; the remaining probands/relatives were discharged from further clinical surveillance. CONCLUSIONS: Genetic testing guides treatment and follow-up of patients with inherited heart diseases and should be carried out in dedicated multidisciplinary clinics with expertise for counseling and cascade screening of family members.

Models and Outcomes of Multidisciplinary Clinics in Colorectal Cancer.

Multidisciplinary clinics (MDCs) represent a potential platform through which high-quality, patient-centered care grounded in interdisciplinary expertise may be delivered for patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). This is increasingly important with the rapidly emerging diagnostic and treatment modalities as well as differential sequences of therapies available. MDCs have been reported to improve various outcomes across numerous non-colorectal cancers; however, data specific to the use of MDCs in CRC are more limited. In this report, we provide a narrative review of the different models of CRC MDCs in the literature and their associations with cancer care outcomes. We found significant heterogeneity in MDC operational logistics as well as reported outcomes across different practice settings. Further research is needed to better understand how MDCs may be optimally structured to meet the unique needs of patients with CRC and how they may affect CRC outcomes.

Long-term follow-up in congenital diaphragmatic hernia.

With improvements in initial care for patients with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH), the number of CDH patients with severe disease who are surviving to discharge has increased. This growing population of patients faces a unique set of long-term challenges, multisystem adverse outcomes, and post-intervention complications requiring specialized multidisciplinary follow-up. Early identification and intervention are essential to mitigate the potential morbidity associated with these challenges. This manuscript outlines a general framework for long-term follow-up for the CDH patient, including cardiopulmonary, gastrointestinal, neurodevelopmental, surgical, and quality of life outcomes.

Minorities Face Delays to Pancreatic Cancer Treatment Regardless of Diagnosis Setting.

INTRODUCTION: Our analysis was designed to characterize the demographics and disparities between the diagnosis of pancreas cancer during emergency presentation (EP) and the outpatient setting (OP) and to see the impact of our institutions pancreatic multidisciplinary clinic (PMDC) on these disparities. METHODS: Institutional review board-approved retrospective review of our institutional cancer registry and PMDC databases identified patients diagnosed/treated for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma between 2014 and 2022. Chi-square tests were used for categorical variables, and one-way ANOVA with a Bonferroni correction was used for continuous variables. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: A total of 286 patients met inclusion criteria. Eighty-nine patients (31.1%) were underrepresented minorities (URM). Fifty-seven (64.0%) URMs presented during an EP versus 100 (50.8%) non-URMs (p = 0.037). Forty-one (46.1%) URMs were reviewed at PMDC versus 71 (36.0%) non-URMs (p = 0.10). No differences in clinical and pathologic stage between the cohorts (p = 0.28) were present. URMs took 22 days longer on average to receive treatment (66.5 days vs. 44.8 days, p = 0.003) in the EP cohort and 18 days longer in OP cohort (58.0 days vs. 40.5 days, p < 0.001) compared with non-URMs. Pancreatic Multidisciplinary Clinic enrollment in EP cohort eliminated the difference in time to treatment between cohorts (48.3 days vs. 37.0 days; p = 0.151). RESULTS: Underrepresented minorities were more likely to be diagnosed via EP and showed delayed times to treatment compared with non-URM counterparts. Our PMDC alleviated some of these observed disparities. Future studies are required to elucidate the specific factors that resulted in these findings and to identify solutions.

Improving the quality of patient care in lung cancer: key factors for successful multidisciplinary team working.

International Guidelines as well as Cancer Associations recommend a multidisciplinary approach to lung cancer care. A multidisciplinary team (MDT) can significantly improve treatment decision-making and patient coordination by putting different physicians and other health professionals "in the same room", who collectively decide upon the best possible treatment. However, this is not a panacea for cancer treatment. The impact of multidisciplinary care (MDC) on patient outcomes is not univocal, while the effective functioning of the MDT depends on many factors. This review presents the available MDT literature with an emphasis on the key factors that characterize high-quality patient care in lung cancer. The study was conducted with a bibliographic search using different electronic databases (PubMed Central, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Google) referring to multidisciplinary cancer care settings. Many key elements appear consolidated, while others emerge as prevalent and actual, especially those related to visible barriers which work across geographic, organizational, and disciplinary boundaries. MDTs must be sustained by strategic management, structured within the entity, and cannot be managed as a separate care process. Furthermore, they need to coordinate with other teams (within and outside the organization) and join with the broad range of services delivered by multiple providers at various points of the cancer journey or within the system, with the vision of integrated care.

Evaluation of Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy for Outpatients Living with Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction.

Background: Pharmacotherapy is the cornerstone of treatment for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). The Canadian Cardiovascular Society and Canadian Heart Failure Society have defined guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) as 4 foundational medications. Despite strong recommendations for use of GDMT in HFrEF, current practice alignment with guidelines is unknown. Objectives: The primary objectives were to determine the proportion of patients for whom optimized GDMT for HFrEF was prescribed, to describe the doses of foundational medications achieved, and to describe any documented rationale limiting the optimization of GDMT. The secondary objectives were to describe documented pharmacist activities outside of scheduled multidisciplinary appointments at the heart function clinic (HFC) and to describe heart failure-related hospital encounters in 2021. Methods: A retrospective cohort study using medical records of patients with HFrEF who were receiving treatment at the Regina HFC as of December 31, 2021, was conducted. Results: Of the 129 patients included in the study, 61 (47.3%) were prescribed optimized GDMT. Specifically, within the individual foundational medication classes, 82.2% (106/129), 80.6% (104/129), 79.1% (102/129), and 74.4% (96/129) of patients received optimized therapy with a renin-angiotensin system inhibitor, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, ß-blocker, and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor, respectively. Documented rationale was not available in 35.8% (38/106) of instances of suboptimal utilization of GDMT and in 41.7% (60/144) of instances of suboptimal dosing of GDMT. The most common documented rationale for suboptimal utilization was intolerance to the medication (33.0% [35/106]), and the most common rationale for suboptimal dosing was intolerance to dose increases (57.6% [83/144]). Pharmacists documented a total of 553 patient care activities for 58.9% (76/129) of the patients, outside scheduled multidisciplinary appointments in the HFC. Sixteen patients (12.4%) had heart failure-related hospital encounters a total of 31 times in 2021. Conclusions: Although many patients were receiving the benefits of multidisciplinary care at the Regina HFC, there remained a treatment gap in the use of GDMT for HFrEF. These findings will be used to inform strategies to improve clinic processes, including efficient identification of patients requiring optimization of GDMT, who would benefit the most from multidisciplinary care.

Contexte: La pharmacothérapie est la pierre angulaire du traitement de l'insuffisance cardiaque avec fraction d'éjection réduite (ICFEr). La Société cardiovasculaire du Canada et la Société canadienne d'insuffisance cardiaque ont défini le traitement médical fondé sur les lignes directrices (TMFLD) selon 4 médicaments fondamentaux. Malgré de fortes recommandations pour l'utilisation du TMFLD dans l'ICFEr, l'alignement actuel de la pratique sur les lignes directrices est inconnu. Objectifs: Les objectifs principaux étaient de déterminer la proportion de patients pour lesquels un TMFLD optimisé pour l'ICFEr avait été prescrit, de décrire les doses obtenues et de décrire les justifications documentées limitant l'optimisation du TMFLD. Les objectifs secondaires, quant à eux, étaient de décrire les activités documentées du pharmacien en dehors des rendez-vous prévus à la clinique multidisciplinaire de fonction cardiaque et de recenser les consultations hospitalières liées à l'insuffisance cardiaque au cours de l'année civile 2021. Méthodes: Cette étude de cohorte rétrospective se basait sur les dossiers médicaux de patients atteints d'ICFEr qui recevaient un traitement à la clinique de fonction cardiaque de Regina au 31 décembre 2021. Résultats: Sur les 129 patients inclus dans l'étude, 61 d'entre eux (47,3 %) ont reçu un TMFLD optimisé. Plus précisément, en ce qui concerne les classes de médicaments fondamentaux, 82,2 % (106/129) ont reçu un traitement optimal avec un inhibiteur du système rénine-angiotensine, 80,6 % (104/129) avec un antagoniste des récepteurs minéralocorticoïdes, 79,1 % (102/129) avec un ß-bloquant et 74,4 % (96/129) avec un inhibiteur sodique du cotransporteur de glucose 2. Dans 35,8 % (38/106) des cas d'utilisation sous-optimale du TMFLD et dans 41,7 % (60/144) des cas de dosage sous-optimal de celui-ci, la justification documentée était indisponible. Lorsqu'elles étaient documentées, les justifications les plus courantes étaient l'intolérance, respectivement, à l'utilisation d'un médicament (33.0% [35/106]) et à l'augmentation de la dose (57,6 % [83/144]). Les pharmaciens ont consigné un total de 553 activités de soins aux patients pour 58,9 % (76/129) des patients en dehors des rendez-vous multidisciplinaires prévus dans la clinique de fonction cardiaque. Seize (12,4 %) des patients ont été hospitalisés pour une insuffisance cardiaque 31 fois au total en 2021. Conclusion: Bien que de nombreux patients bénéficiaient des soins multidisciplinaires à la clinique de fonction cardiaque de Regina, une lacune subsistait dans le traitement par rapport à l'utilisation du TMFLD pour l'ICFEr. Ces résultats seront utilisés pour éclairer les stratégies visant à améliorer les processus cliniques, y compris l'identification efficace des patients nécessitant une optimisation du TMFLD, qui bénéficieraient le plus de soins multidisciplinaires.

Patient interest in the development of a center for Ehlers-Danlos syndrome/hypermobility spectrum disorder in the Chicagoland region.

BACKGROUND: The Ehlers-Danlos Syndromes (EDS) are a group of connective tissue disorders that are hereditary in nature and characterized by joint hypermobility and tissue fragility. The complex nature of this unique patient population requires multidisciplinary care, but appropriate centers for such care do not exist in large portions of the country. Need for more integrated services has been identified in Chicagoland, or Chicago and its suburbs. In order to explore and begin to address barriers to seeking appropriate care facing EDS patients in this region, we developed an online survey which we circulated through EDS social media groups for Chicagoland patients. RESULTS: Three hundred and nine unique respondents participated. We found that there exists a strong medical need for and interest in the development of a center in the region, and participants reported that, if made available to them, they would make extensive and regular use of such a facility. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the establishment of a collaborative medical center specializing in the diagnosis and treatment of EDS, Hypermobility Spectrum Disorder, and related disorders in the Chicagoland area would greatly benefit patients by providing comprehensive care, alleviate the burden on overworked healthcare providers, and contribute to the sustainability of medical facilities.

Impact of Multidisciplinary Heart Failure Clinic on Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy and Clinical Outcomes.

Background: Heart failure (HF) is associated with recurrent hospital admissions and high mortality. Guideline-directed medical therapy has been shown to improve prognosis for patients who have HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Despite the proven benefits of guideline-directed medical therapy, its utilization is less than optimal among patients with HF in Malaysia. Objective: To determine the impact of a multidisciplinary team HF (MDT-HF) clinic on the use of guideline-directed medical therapy and patients' clinical outcomes at 1 year. Methods: This retrospective study was conducted in a single cardiac centre in Malaysia. Patients with HFrEF who were enrolled in the MDT-HF clinic between November 2017 and June 2020 were compared with a matched control group who received the standard of care. Data were retrieved from the hospital electronic system and were analyzed using statistical software. Results: A total of 54 patients were included in each group. Patients enrolled in the MDT-HF clinic had higher usage of renin-angiotensin system blockers (54 [100%] vs 47 [87%], p < 0.001) and higher attainment of the target dose for these agents (35 [65%] vs 5 [9%], p < 0.001). At 1 year, the mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was significantly greater in the MDT-HF group (35.7% [standard deviation 12.3%] vs 26.2% [standard deviation 8.7%], p < 0.001), and care in the MDT-HF clinic was significantly associated with better functional class, with a lower proportion of patients categorized as having New York Heart Association class III HF at 1 year (1 [2%] vs 14 [26%], p = 0.001). Patients in the MDT-HF group also had a significantly lower rate of readmission for HF (4 [7%] vs 32 [59%], p < 0.001). Conclusions: Patients who received care in the MDT-HF clinic had better use of guideline-directed medical therapy, greater improvement in LVEF, and a lower rate of readmission for HF at 1 year relative to patients who received the standard of care.

Contexte: L'insuffisance cardiaque (IC) est associée à des hospitalisations récurrentes et à une mortalité élevée. Il a été démontré qu'un traitement médical orienté par des lignes directrices améliore le pronostic des patients atteints d'insuffisance cardiaque avec fraction d'éjection réduite (ICFER). Malgré les avantages éprouvés du traitement médical orienté par des lignes directrices, son utilisation est loin d'être optimale chez les patients atteints d'IC en Malaisie. Objectif: Déterminer l'incidence d'une clinique d'IC en équipe multidisciplinaire (IC-ÉM) sur l'utilisation d'un traitement médical orienté par des lignes directrices et les résultats cliniques des patients à 1 an. Méthodes: Cette étude rétrospective a été menée dans un seul centre cardiaque en Malaisie. Les patients atteints d'ICFER inscrits à la clinique d'IC-ÉM entre novembre 2017 et juin 2020 ont été comparés à un groupe témoin apparié ayant reçu des soins standard. Les données ont été extraites du système électronique de l'hôpital et analysées à l'aide d'un logiciel statistique. Résultats: Au total, 54 patients ont été inclus dans chaque groupe. L'utilisation d'inhibiteurs du système rénine-angiotensine était plus élevée chez les patients inscrits à la clinique d'IC-ÉM (54 [100 %] contre 47 [87 %], p < 0,001) et la dose cible pour ces agents était mieux atteinte (35 [65 %] contre 5 [9 %], p < 0,001). Á 1 an, la fraction d'éjection ventriculaire gauche (FÉVG) moyenne était significativement plus élevée chez les patients ayant reçu des soins dans la clinique d'IC-ÉM (35,7 % [écart type 12,3 %] contre 26,2 % [écart type 8,7 %], p < 0,001), et les soins prodigués dans la clinique d'IC-ÉM étaient significativement associés à une meilleure classe fonctionnelle, avec une proportion plus faible de personnes classées comme ayant une IC de classe III selon la New York Heart Association à 1 an (1 [2 %] contre 14 [26 %], p = 0,001). Le taux de réadmission pour IC des patients du groupe IC-ÉM était aussi significativement plus faible (4 [7 %] contre 32 [59 %], p < 0,001). Conclusions: L'utilisation du traitement médical orienté par des lignes directrices chez les patients ayant reçu des soins dans la clinique d'IC-ÉM était meilleure, leur FÉVG s'est améliorée dans une plus grande mesure, et leur taux de réadmission pour IC à 1 an était plus faible par rapport aux patients ayant reçu les soins standard.

Referral patterns and genetic testing outcomes in a contemporary hereditary renal cancer clinic.

OBJECTIVES: Multidisciplinary hereditary tumor clinics are a collaborative format to identify and treat patients with genetic cancer predispositions. The hereditary renal cancer clinic at Indiana University is comprised of a urologic oncologist, medical oncologist, clinical geneticist, and genetic counselor. The clinic holds regular tumor board meetings, where patient histories, pedigrees, imaging, pathology, and management plans are collectively reviewed and discussed. Here we report the contemporary experience for our hereditary renal cancer clinic, with description and analysis of referral patterns, patient profiles, and genetic testing outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of an IRB-approved, prospectively maintained database of patients seen in the hereditary renal cancer clinic was performed. Patient characteristics, genetic testing results, and disease characteristics were reported and analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 142 patients seen in clinics from January 2018 to June 2023 were included. Patient's median age was between 40 and 49 years old, and 88.7% were Caucasian. The most common reasons for referral were early-onset renal tumors (40%), known hereditary renal cancer syndrome (29%), and hereditary renal cancer syndrome screening (13%). Of those with a tissue diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma, 46.2% were clear cell subtype. The presence of nonrenal syndromic features concerning for hereditary renal tumor syndrome was predictive of pathogenic mutation identification (OR 13.45, P < 0.0001). Patient race and presence of multifocal tumors were not predictive of pathogenic mutation identification. When restricting analysis to patients with an established renal malignancy, high-grade tumor histology was predictive of a pathogenic mutation (OR 8.17, P = 0.012), though higher pathologic stage and nonclear cell histology were not. Referral for early-onset renal tumor (age < 45 years) predicted lower likelihood of pathogenic mutations (OR 0.10, P = 0.0002). FH gene mutations were the most commonly identified pathogenic mutations. Genetic testing of family members (cascade testing) was recommended to 9 patients seen in clinic; a pathogenic mutation was subsequently identified in all but one of these families. CONCLUSIONS: These findings are useful for referring physicians and patients in determining patient referral to hereditary cancer clinics, and for counseling patients undergoing genetic testing. Data from non-Caucasian patients and evolving implications of variants of unclear significance (VUS) may represent future research directions for hereditary renal cancer clinics.

Radiologically Inserted Gastrostomy Tube Placement Guided by the Assessment and Primary Palliative Care Provided by an Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Multidisciplinary Clinic: A Single-Arm Retrospective Clinical Study.

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a neurodegenerative disease with a median survival of about 3 years. An ALS multidisciplinary team can provide primary palliative care and improve outcomes and quality of life for patients. Feeding tube insertion may be considered for patients with significant weight loss, or respiratory insufficiency. While radiologically inserted gastrostomy (RIG) tube placement may be an option, further studies are required to determine its best timing and appropriateness. This study's objectives were to evaluate the feasibility and outcomes of RIG tube placement in ALS patients over a 90-day follow-up period through the assessment and primary palliative care provided by the multidisciplinary team. This retrospective study reviewed the placement of 16 or 18 French RIG-tube without intubation or endoscopy for 36 ALS patients at a single center between April 2019 and December 2021. Measures included ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R) scores to determine the ALS stage. Demographic, clinical, procedural, and follow-up data were reviewed. Results showed that the RIG tube placement had a low rate of minor adverse events (11%) and no major procedure-related adverse events. The mean ALSFRS-R score at the time of procedure in subjects who died within 90 days was lower than of those alive beyond 90 days (P = .04). This study found that RIG-tube placement is a safe and effective way to manage dysphagia in ALS patients and highlights the importance of educating members of the multidisciplinary clinic in palliative care principles to determine the appropriateness of RIG tube placement.

Patterns of breast reconstruction and the influence of a surgical multidisciplinary clinic.

BACKGROUND: Of the 40% of breast cancer patients who have a mastectomy as part of their surgical treatment, only approximately 29% have a breast reconstruction. In 2016, Alfred Health established a multidisciplinary surgical clinic with breast and plastic surgeons, aiming to improve interdisciplinary collaboration. This study aimed to assess the provision of breast reconstruction at an Australian tertiary public hospital and examine whether the multidisciplinary surgical clinic have improved our reconstructive service provision. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent mastectomy at Alfred Health between October 2011 and September 2021 was conducted. Patients were divided into before and after groups, treated during the 5-year period before and after establishing the multidisciplinary clinic respectively. Demographic data, operative details, histopathology, and treatments were compared. RESULTS: Over the 10-year period, 423 mastectomies were performed for 351 patients. Of those, 153 patients underwent breast reconstruction, providing an overall reconstruction rate of 43.6%. There was a statistically significant increase in the breast reconstruction rate from 36.5% before to 53.4% after the creation of the multidisciplinary surgical clinic. Patient factors such as age and tumour receptor status did not differ significantly between the groups. CONCLUSION: The establishment of a surgical multidisciplinary clinic has led to a statistically significant increase in the rate of breast reconstruction from 36.5% to 53.4%, leading to improved healthcare provision for our patients. Factors identified to be associated with increased uptake in the reconstruction service include younger age and node negative disease.

Evaluating Patient Experience in a Multidisciplinary Breast Cancer Clinic: A Prospective Study.

Background: Multidisciplinary clinics (MDCs) are a care model in which patients see several physicians across specialties and/or other allied health professionals in a single appointment in a shared space. This study sought to better understand patients' experiences with breast cancer (BC) MDC. Methods: A total of 429 patients diagnosed with BC and seen in a MDC between November 2020 and November 2021 were invited to participate in a patient experience survey. Results: In total, 116 patient respondents (27%) with representative demographics described their experience. Most patients report feeling "somewhat prepared" for the BC MDC experience (67%, median = 3.7, interquartile range [IQR] = 1.9), but with variability. The major areas of positive feedback were that the MDC was convenient (89.3%), efficient use of time (65.2%), and a good way to get questions answered (65.2%). Major criticisms included that the MDC was overwhelming (16.1%) and/or too long (4.5%). When asked to rate the top three satisfaction areas of MDCs, patients chose seeing multiple providers during a single visit (80.4%), communication about the process before and throughout the MDC (48.2%), and inclusivity of their support system (38.4%). The highest rated dissatisfiers were the volume of information presented (42.9%) and patients' emotional comfort (anxiety/stress) during MDC appointment (30.2%). Overall, 83% of patients with BC rate the MDC experience as excellent (median = 4.8, IQR = 0.9) and would be "very likely" to recommend BC MDC (median = 4.8, IQR = 0.9). Conclusion: Patients value seeing multiple providers simultaneously in an environment inclusive of their support systems, which is described as convenient and efficient. Improving emotional distress is a key opportunity to improve patient experience.

Patient and Clinician Experiences With the Combination of Virtual and In-Person Chronic Kidney Disease Care Since the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Background: Following onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, chronic kidney disease (CKD) clinics in BC shifted from established methods of mostly in-person care delivery to virtual care (VC) and thereafter a hybrid of the two. Objectives: To determine strengths, weaknesses, quality-of-care delivery, and key considerations associated with VC usage to inform optimal way(s) of integrating virtual and traditional methods of care delivery in multidisciplinary kidney clinics. Design: Qualitative evaluation. Setting: British Columbia, Canada. Participants: Patients and health care providers associated with multidisciplinary kidney care clinics. Methods: Development and delivery of semi-structured interviews of patients and health care providers. Results: 11 patients and/or caregivers and 12 health care providers participated in the interviews. Participants reported mixed experiences with VC usage. All participants foresaw a future where both VC and in-person care was offered. A reported benefit of VC was convenience for patients. Challenges identified with VC included difficulty establishing new therapeutic relationships, and variable of abilities of both patients and health care providers to engage and communicate in a virtual format. Participants noted a preference for in-person care for more complex situations. Four themes were identified as considerations when selecting between in-person and VC: person's nonmedical context, support available, clinical parameters and tasks to be completed, and clinic operations. Participants indicated that visit modality selection is an individualized and ongoing process involving the patient and their preferences which may change over time. Health care provider participants noted that new workflow challenges were created when using both VC and in-person care in the same clinic session. Limitations: Limited sample size in the setting of one-on-one interviews and use of convenience sampling which may result in missing perspectives, including those already facing challenges accessing care who could potentially be most disadvantaged by implementation of VC. Conclusions: A list of key considerations, aligned with quality care delivery was identified for health care providers and programs to consider as they continue to utilize VC and refine how best to use different visit modalities in different patient and clinical situations. Further work will be needed to validate these findings and evaluate clinical outcomes with the combination of virtual and traditional modes of care delivery. Trial registration: Not registered.

Contexte: Après le début de la pandémie de COVID-19, les cliniques d'insuffisance rénale chronique (IRC) de la Colombie-Britannique sont passées d'une prestation de soins traditionnelle fondée principalement sur les visites en personne à des soins en mode virtuel, puis à un modèle hybride combinant les deux méthodes. Objectifs: Déterminer les avantages et les faiblesses des soins en mode virtuel, ainsi que la qualité de la prestation des soins et les principaux facteurs à considérer relativement à l'utilization des soins en mode virtuel, afin d'informer sur les meilleurs moyens d'intégrer les méthodes virtuelles et traditionnelles de prestation des soins dans les cliniques multidisciplinaires de néphrologie. Conception: Évaluation qualitative. Cadre: Colombie-Britannique (Canada). Sujets: Patients et prestataires de soins associés à des cliniques multidisciplinaires de soins rénaux. Méthodologie: Élaboration et réalisation d'entrevues semi-structurées auprès de patients et de prestataires de soins de santé. Résultats: En tout, 11 patients et/ou soignants et 12 prestataires de soins de santé ont participé aux entrevues. Les participants ont fait état d'expériences mitigées avec les soins en mode virtuel. Tous les participants envisageaient un futur où les soins seront offerts tant en mode virtuel qu'en personne. Un des avantages mentionnés des soins en mode virtuel est la commodité pour les patients. Parmi les défis mentionnés figuraient la difficulté à établir de nouvelles relations thérapeutiques et les capacités variables des patients et des prestataires de soins de santé à établir une relation et à communiquer en mode virtuel. Les participants ont noté une préférence pour les soins en personne dans les situations plus complexes. Quatre thèmes ont été identifiés comme facteurs à prendre en compte dans le choix entre les soins virtuels ou en personne: le contexte non médical de la personne, l'aide disponible, les paramètres cliniques et les tâches à accomplir, et les opérations de la clinique. Les participants ont indiqué que le choix de la modalité pour les visites est un processus individualisé et continu impliquant le patient et ses préférences, lesquelles peuvent changer au fil du temps. Les prestataires de soins ont indiqué que le fait d'offrir à la fois des soins virtuels et en personne dans une même séance clinique créait de nouveaux défis en matière de flux de travail. Limites: La taille limitée de l'échantillon pour les entrevues individuelles et l'utilization d'un échantillonnage de commodité pourraient avoir manqué certains points de vue, notamment celui de personnes déjà confrontées à des difficultés d'accès aux soins et qui pourraient être les plus désavantagées par la mise en œuvre de soins en mode virtuel. Conclusion: Une liste de facteurs-clé à prendre en compte pour une prestation de soins de qualité a été établie à l'attention des prestataires de soins de santé et des programs qui continuent à utiliser les soins en mode virtuel, et décrit la meilleure façon d'utiliser les différentes modalités de visites dans différentes situations cliniques et pour différents patients. D'autres travaux seront nécessaires pour valider ces résultats et évaluer les résultats cliniques lorsqu'il y a combinaison des modes virtuel et traditionnel pour la prestation des soins.

Local Control in Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma to the Spine: The Experience of an Institution with a Multidisciplinary Spine Oncology Program.

BACKGROUND: The outcomes for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) to the spine who underwent stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) through a multidisciplinary spine oncology program are not well described. We sought to describe the clinical course and local control rates at 1 and 2 years for these patients. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database of adult oncologic patients receiving SBRT to the spine through a multidisciplinary spine oncology program at a single institution from 2010 to 2021 was performed. Patients with a pathologic diagnosis of RCC were included. RESULTS: A total of 75 spinal sites were treated in 60 patients. Of the 60 patients, 75.0% were men, and the mean patient age was 59.2 ± 11.3 years. At 1 year after treatment, 6 of the 60 patients were lost to follow-up. Of the remaining 54 patients, 18 were censored by death and 7 treatment sites showed local recurrence, for 37 of 44 treatment sites with local control (87.8%). At 2 years, 1 additional local recurrence had developed, 15 patients were censored by death, and no additional patients had been lost to follow-up, resulting in 28 of 36 treatment sites with local control (83.2%). None of the patients who had undergone repeat SBRT had local recurrence at 1 or 2 years. For those with local recurrence, the average time from treatment to progression was 6.6 ± 6.5 months. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort, one of the largest reported studies of spine SBRT for metastatic RCC, local control was high at 1 and 2 years. Our findings support the role of coordinated, algorithmic treatment for these patients.

Characterizing Variability in Lung Cancer Outcomes and Influence of a Lung Diagnostic Assessment Program in Southeastern Ontario, Canada.

INTRODUCTION: Regional variability in lung cancer (LC) outcomes exists across Canada, including in the province of Ontario. The Lung Diagnostic Assessment Program (LDAP) in southeastern (SE) Ontario is a rapid-assessment clinic that expedites the management of patients with suspected LC. We evaluated the association of LDAP management with LC outcomes, including survival, and characterized the variability in LC outcomes across SE Ontario. METHODS: We conducted a population-based retrospective cohort study by identifying patients with newly diagnosed LC through the Ontario Cancer Registry (January 2017-December 2019) and linked to the LDAP database to identify LDAP-managed patients. Descriptive data were collected. Using a Cox model approach, we compared 2-year survival for patients managed through LDAP vs. non-LDAP. RESULTS: We identified 1832 patients, 1742 of whom met the inclusion criteria (47% LDAP-managed and 53% non-LDAP). LDAP management was associated with a lower probability of dying at 2 years (HR 0.76 vs. non-LDAP, p < 0.0001). Increasing distance from the LDAP was associated with a lower likelihood of LDAP management (OR 0.78 for every 20 km increase, p < 0.0001). LDAP-managed patients were more likely to receive specialist assessment and undergo treatments. CONCLUSIONS: In SE Ontario, initial diagnostic care provided via LDAP was independently associated with improved survival in patients with LC.

Myositis Multidisciplinary Clinic in a Tertiary Referral Center.

Background: Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) are a rare heterogeneous group of diseases characterised by chronic skeletal muscle inflammation, but other organs are also frequently involved. IMM represent a diagnostic challenge and a multidisciplinary approach is important to ensure successful diagnosis and adequate follow-up of these patients. Objective: To describe the general functioning of our multidisciplinary myositis clinic, highlighting the benefits of multidisciplinary team management in patients with confirmed or suspected IIM and to characterise our clinical experience. Methods: Description of the organization of a dedicated multidisciplinary myositis outpatient clinic, supported by IMM specific electronic assessment tools and protocols based on our Portuguese Register - Reuma.pt. In addition, an overview of our activity between 2017 and 2022 is provided. Results: An IIM multidisciplinary care clinic, based on a close collaboration between Rheumatologists, Dermatologists and Physiatrist is detailed in this paper. One hundred and eighty-five patients were assessed in our myositis clinic; 138 (75%) of those were female, with a median age of 58 [45-70] years. At the last appointment, 130 patients had a confirmed IIM diagnosis, and the mean disease duration was 4 [2-6] years. The most frequent diagnosis was dermatomyositis (n = 34, 26.2%), followed by antisynthetase syndrome (n = 27, 20.8%) and clinically amyopathic/paucimyopathic dermatomyositis (n = 18, 13.8%). Twenty-four patients (18.5%) were on monotherapy and 94 (72.3%) were on combination therapy. Conclusion: A multidisciplinary approach is important to ensure the correct diagnosis and follow-up of these patients. A myositis clinic, with a standardised practice at a tertiary hospital level, contributes to a standardization of care and opens research opportunities.

Informing a value care model: lessons from an integrated adult neurogenomics clinic.

BACKGROUND: Advances in genomics provide improved opportunities for diagnosis of complex neurogenetic disorders, yet the optimal approach to translate these benefits to the outpatient clinic is unclear. AIMS: We retrospectively reviewed referral indications and outcomes of an integrated multidisciplinary team (MDT) clinic pathway for adults with suspected neurogenetic disorders. The associated cost implications were estimated. METHODS: Consecutive patients who attended the neurogenomics clinic from January 2017 to April 2020 were included. The clinic comprised neurologists, clinical geneticists and genetic counsellors, who assessed each patient concurrently. RESULTS: Ninety-nine new patients were referred spanning 45 different clinical diagnoses. Following MDT clinical assessment, 23% (23/99) of referral diagnoses were revised prior to molecular testing. Eighty-one patients (82%) underwent genetic testing, including 43 exome-based panels, 15 whole-genome sequencing, 14 single gene tests, 27 repeat-primed polymerase chain reaction testing and two chromosomal microarrays. Overall, 33/99 patients (33%) received a diagnosis, either a molecular diagnosis (n = 24, of which 22 were diagnostic and two were predictive) or a clinical diagnosis (n = 9). Of the clinical diagnosis cohort, five patients received a diagnosis without molecular testing and four patients whose negative testing (one diagnostic and three predictive) allowed exclusion of genetic differentials and, hence, confirmation of clinical diagnoses. The diagnostic rate following MDT and diagnostic testing was 30% (28/94), excluding the five predictive testing cases. MDT assessment aligned with eventual molecular diagnoses in 96% of cases. The estimated average costs were AU$1386 per patient undergoing MDT assessment and AU$4159 per diagnosis achieved. CONCLUSIONS: We present an integrated multidisciplinary neurogenomics clinic pathway providing a diagnostic yield of 33% (30% excluding predictive testing cases), with costing implications. The relatively high diagnostic yield may be attributed to multidisciplinary input integrating accurate phenotyping of complex disorders and interpretation of genomic findings.

Can a Multidisciplinary Endocrine Clinic be Beneficial for Patients and Surgeons?

BACKGROUND: Multidisciplinary clinics are expected to improve patient care by enhancing efficiency for both patients and care providers. We hypothesized that while these clinics are an efficient use of time for patients, they can limit a surgeon's productivity. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed for patients evaluated in a Multidisciplinary Endocrine Tumor Clinic (MDETC) and Multidisciplinary Thyroid Cancer Clinic (MDTCC) from 2018 to 2021. Time from evaluation to surgery and prevalence of surgery were evaluated. Patients were compared to those evaluated in a surgeon-only endocrine surgery clinic (ESC) from 2017 to 2021. Chi-square and t-tests were used to test significance. RESULTS: Patients referred to the ESC underwent surgery more often than those referred to either multidisciplinary clinic (ESC 79.5%, MDETC 24.6%, MDTCC 7%; P < .001) but had a significantly longer delay between appointment and operation (ESC 19.9 days, MDETC 3.3 days, MDTCC 16.4 days; P < .001). Patients had a longer wait from referral to appointment for the MDCs (ESC 22.6 days, MDETC: 44.5, MDTCC 33; P < .05). There was no significant difference in miles traveled by patients to any clinic. CONCLUSION: Multidisciplinary clinics can provide fewer appointments and faster time to surgery for patients but may lead to longer wait time from referral to appointment and fewer overall surgeries than endocrine surgeon-only clinics.