First interim results from FINE-REAL: a prospective, non-interventional, phase 4 study providing insights into the use and safety of finerenone in a routine clinical setting.

BACKGROUND: Finerenone, a selective non-steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, improves kidney and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) associated with type 2 diabetes (T2D). The FINE-REAL study (NCT05348733) aims to evaluate the characteristics and treatment patterns of participants treated with finerenone in clinical practice. METHODS: FINE-REAL is a prospective, single-arm, non-interventional study of patients initiated on finerenone as part of their routine care in accordance with country-approved labels. The study, initiated in June 2022, is expected to be completed by January 2028. The cutoff for this pre-specified interim analysis was June 13, 2023. RESULTS: Participants were recruited across nephrology, endocrinology, cardiology, and primary care settings. Of 556 participants enrolled in the study by the cut-off date, 504 were included in this analysis (median follow-up duration of 7 months [finerenone treatment initiation to last recorded observation]). At baseline, 76.1% of participants were in the high or very high (KDIGO) CKD risk categories. Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors were prescribed to 71.8% and 46.6% of participants, respectively. Based on prescribing information, 87.9% and 12.1% of participants initiated finerenone at doses of 10 and 20 mg, respectively. Finerenone treatment was uninterrupted in 92.3% of participants after 7 months' median follow-up. Treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 110 (21.8%) participants. Hyperkalemia occurred in 25 (5.0%) participants, with no cases leading to death, dialysis, or hospitalization. CONCLUSION: At this interim analysis, finerenone was initiated in patients with CKD and T2D across various clinical practices participating in the study. Treatment discontinuation and hyperkalemia occurred infrequently.

Topical treatment of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) with high-concentration (179 mg) capsaicin patch in breast cancer patients - results of the QUCIP study.

Background: Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) following oral or intravenous chemotherapy often results in neuropathic pain, accompanied by symptoms such tingling, burning and hypersensitivity to stimuli, with a notable decline in quality of life (QoL). Effective therapies for CIPN are lacking, with a high demand for analgesics to address this issue. The QUCIP study aimed to assess the effectiveness of high concentration (179 mg) capsaicin patch (HCCP) in alleviating neuropathic pain and associated symptoms in breast cancer patients with confirmed CIPN. Methods: QUCIP is a prospective, multi-center observational study spanning 36 weeks with up to three HCCP treatments. Initial treatment (visit V0) was followed by two telephone contacts (T1, T2) and subsequent face-to-face visits every 12 weeks or upon retreatment (visits V1-V3). 73 female patients with painful CIPN post neoadjuvant/adjuvant breast cancer therapy were enrolled. Primary endpoint was the reduction of neuropathic pain symptom score (painDETECT®). Secondary endpoints included improvements in CIPN-specific QoL (QLQ-CIPN20), reductions in pain intensity (numeric pain rating scale, NPRS), and achievement of ≥ 30% and ≥ 50% pain reduction. Results: Median age was 61 years, with 52.0% of patients experiencing peripheral neuropathic pain for > 1 year (> 2 years: 34.2%). The painDETECT® score significantly decreased from baseline (19.71 ± 4.69) to 15.80 ± 6.20 after initial treatment (p < 0.0001) and continued to decrease at follow-up visits. The NPRS indicated significant pain intensity reduction at each time point, particularly pronounced in patients receiving three HCCP treatments. Clinically significant pain relief of ≥ 30% increased from 25.0% at week 4 (T2) to 36.2%, 43.5%, and 40.0% at weeks 12 (V1), 24 (V2), and 36 (V3), respectively. The percentage of patients achieving pain relief of ≥ 50% increased from 14.7% at T2 to 15.5%, 21.7% and 32.5% at V1, V2 and V3, respectively. Patients further reported a significant improvement in their CIPN-related QoL throughout the study. Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) mainly included application site reactions. Conclusion: In this study, HCCP shows benefit in managing CIPN in real-world settings. The data demonstrate a sustained and progressive reduction in neuropathic pain and symptomatology, confirming the clinical benefit of repeated treatment observed in former clinical trials. HCCP treatment has also the potential to significantly improve the QoL associated with CIPN. The safety profile of HCCP was confirmed, supporting its use in clinical practice.

House dust mite sublingual allergen immunotherapy tablet is safe and well-tolerated in Dutch clinical practice.

Background: Half (49%) of clinically diagnosed allergic rhinitis (AR) patients are sensitized to house dust mite (HDM). If allergen avoidance and symptomatic medication fail, allergen immunotherapy may be indicated. Objective: We investigated safety and tolerability of HDM-sublingual immunotherapy by HDM-SLIT tablets in Dutch daily clinical practice. Methods: Daily intake of 12 SQ-HDM SLIT-tablet was investigated in a prospective, multicenter, observational study (EUPAS43753). It comprised 4 consultations in 1 year. Data on safety, tolerability, treatment satisfaction, symptomatic medication, compliance, and clinical effectiveness (Control of Allergic Rhinitis and Asthma Test; CARAT) were collected. Descriptive and longitudinal regression data analysis were performed. Results: Adult patients (n = 415), mean (SD) age 36.6 (12.2) years, 61.4% female and 36% asthmatic were included. The preponderance (65.1%) experienced adverse events (AEs). These, mostly mild (67%), AEs comprised: oral allergic reactions (58.6%), respiratory (12.4%) and gastrointestinal symptoms (9.4%). Sixty (14.5%) patients stopped due to AEs and 76 (18.3%) for non-AE reasons. CARAT scores improved clinically significant by 6 points and symptomatic medication use decreased from 96.1% to 77.4%. Most patients (74.5%) tolerated the treatment and were compliant (>86.5%). The majority of patients (62.4%) and investigators (69.4%) were satisfied with treatment. Conclusions: HDM SLIT-tablet is a safe and well-tolerated AR treatment. AEs occur often but are mostly mild and decreasing during the first year. CARAT scores improved and symptomatic medication use decreased suggesting better control of AR with treatment. Compliance, tolerability, and treatment satisfaction are good. However, patient follow-up and compliance remain important points of attention when initiating treatment.

Improvements in Plaque Psoriasis Associated with Calcipotriol/Betamethasone Aerosol Foam Treatment: A Post Hoc Analysis of Non-interventional Studies and Clinical Experience.

INTRODUCTION: Plaque psoriasis is a chronic relapsing inflammatory skin disease that is associated with extensive disease burden that often requires long-term therapy. Treatment of psoriasis with 4 weeks of the aerosol foam formulation of calcipotriol/betamethasone dipropionate (Cal/BD; Enstilar®, LEO Pharma) has been demonstrated to be effective, well tolerated, and associated with high patient satisfaction. Cal/BD foam is approved as a first-line treatment in multiple countries, where several non-interventional studies (NIS) have corroborated the beneficial efficacy and safety profiles determined in the randomized clinical trials. Heterogenicity in these NIS, however, prevents the use of a data pooling strategy for comparisons of effectiveness outcomes across different patient populations. METHODS: Therefore, here, we report on a post hoc analysis of effectiveness data consolidated from six prospective NIS to discern any differences in improvement in signs and symptoms of psoriasis attributable to Cal/BD foam treatment across the countries. In addition, we provide real-world experience of clinicians with Cal/BD foam treatment, factoring in changes in usage since these NIS were performed in their local markets. RESULTS: This post hoc analysis of Cal/BD foam NIS brings together data outside of randomized clinical trials from six countries to provide real-world evidence in 1388 patients showing that 4 weeks of Cal/BD foam is an effective and safe treatment option with quick onset of action for patients with psoriasis. CONCLUSION: These results show that regardless of NIS location, Cal/BD foam remains a well-tolerated, efficacious option for patient care that could be used as a first-line topical therapy for mild-to-severe psoriasis.

Management of Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis with Brodalumab in Daily Practice: Real-World Evidence from the LIBERO Study in the Czech Republic.

INTRODUCTION: Psoriasis is a chronic, immune-mediated inflammatory skin disease. Despite the availability of several therapies, many patients affected by this disease remain untreated, do not have adequate response, or suffer from treatment-related toxic effects. It has been shown that the interleukin (IL)-17 pathway plays a key role in the immunopathogenesis of psoriasis. Brodalumab, the first human monoclonal IgG2 antibody that selectively binds to subunit A of the human IL-17 receptor, blocking interactions with a number of cytokines of the IL-17 family, has confirmed fast onset of action, high complete clearance rates, and sustained efficacy. Nevertheless, there is only a limited amount of published real-world evidence (RWE) data. METHODS: This was an open-label, multicenter, real-world, prospective, non-interventional, non-controlled (single-arm) observational study (LIBERO-CZ) assessing the management of moderate to severe psoriasis with brodalumab in daily practice for up to 52 weeks of treatment. RESULTS: Fifty-four patients (70.4% male, mean age 46.9 ± 13.4 years, weight 95.6 ± 22.7 kg, disease duration 18.6 ± 12.7 years) were enrolled and included in the final analysis. Forty-nine of the patients completed the study and five discontinued prematurely; 51.8% of all the enrolled patients were biologic-naïve. At baseline, 28% patients were classified as severe (psoriasis area severity index (PASI) ≥ 20). Overall, the mean PASI decreased by 15.6 from 16.1 (± 5.0) at baseline to 0.5 (± 1.2) at the last visit. The primary endpoint of an absolute PASI ≤ 3 at week 12 (as observed analysis) was achieved by 95.9% of patients. The static Physician's Global Assessment (sPGA) success (defined as clear = 0 and almost clear = 1) at week 52 was achieved by 92.1% of patients. PASI 75, PASI 90, and PASI 100 were achieved by 98.0%, 87.8%, and 75.5% of patients, respectively, after approximately 52 weeks of treatment. The study also recorded very positive results concerning patient-reported outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: LIBERO-CZ confirms the fast onset and high clearance rates of brodalumab in real life in both biologic-naïve and biologic-experienced patients.

A cross-sectional study on the prevalence of cardiovascular disease in elderly patients with long-term type 2 diabetes mellitus mainly attended in private clinics in Mexico. The CAPTURE study.

BACKGROUND: To estimate the contemporary prevalence of established cardiovascular disease (CVD) in adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D) in Mexico. METHODS: CAPTURE was a multinational, non-interventional, cross-sectional study across 13 countries from five continents. Standardized demographic and clinical data were collected from adults with T2D attending a single routine healthcare visit in primary or specialized care between December 2018 and September 2019. Data from Mexico are analyzed in this study. RESULTS: Of the 9,823 patients included in the CAPTURE study, 820 (8.3%) participants were from Mexico, mainly attended in private centers (29.3% in 6 specialized diabetes treatment centers and 70.7% in 26 primary care centers). The median age was 63.0 years, 52.6% were women, the duration of diabetes was 11.8 years and the average HbA1c 7.5%. The weighted prevalence [95% CI] of CVD and atherosclerotic CVD was 36.9% [34.1-39.6] and 29.5% [26.7-32.3], respectively. Additionally, the prevalence of coronary heart disease, heart failure, peripheral arterial disease and cerebrovascular disease was 23.1% [20.6-25-7], 8.4% [6.8-10.0], 5.0% [3.5-6.5] and 3.9% [2.6-5.2], respectively. Glucose lowering drugs were used in 88.5% of patients, being metformin the most commonly drug used (79.4%), followed by sulfonylureas (26.3%). SGLT-2 inhibitors and GLP1 receptor agonists were used in 15.5% and 3.9%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In Mexico, nearly four out of ten patients with T2D mainly attended in private centers have CVD, particularly atherosclerotic CVD. Most patients were not taking glucose lowering drugs with proven CV benefit.

[Therapy of asthenic disorders after psychotic conditions in patients with cognitive impairment: results of an observational non-interventional program]. / Terapiya astenicheskikh rasstroistv posle perenesennykh psikhoticheskikh sostoyanii u patsientov s kognitivnymi narusheniyami: rezul'taty nablyudatel'noi neinterventsionnoi programmy.

OBJECTIVE: An observational non-interventional study was conducted to obtain data on the efficacy and safety of Prospekta in the treatment of postpsychotic asthenia in patients with cognitive impairment (CI). MATERIAL AND METHODS: We selected 69 patients aged 18-75 years with asthenic disorders that developed after suffering psychotic conditions and CI, who were prescribed Prospekta. At four visits (at baseline, after 2, 4 and 8 weeks), the doctor collected complaints, anamnesis, examined the patient, assessed the severity of asthenia on the MFI-20 (The Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory-20) scale, CI - on the MMSE (The Mini-mental state examination). Concomitant diseases and maintenance therapy of the underlying disease were recorded, and the safety of treatment with Prospect was evaluated. At the last visit, the doctor's clinical impression was assessed using the CGI-I (Clinical Global Impression - Global Improvement Scale). RESULTS: The analysis included data from 69 patients (mean age 45.7 years), of which 27 (33.4%) were women. Prospekta reduced the severity of asthenia on the MFI-20 scale from 85.7±6.6 to 51.6±7.1 points, including general asthenia, mental and physical asthenia, and contributed to an increase in activity and motivation (p<0.001). 8-week treatment with Prospekta improved cognitive function on the MMSE scale from 25.7±3.7 to 28.8±1.5 points (p<0.001). There was no effect of the drug on blood pressure, heart rate. 76 adverse events (AEs) were detected in 22 patients, of which 62 AEs (82%) were of mild severity, 14 AEs (18%) were of moderate severity. A causal relationship of AEs with taking Prospekta, according to doctors, was absent in 48 (63%) cases. CONCLUSION: Prospekta is an effective and safe drug for the treatment of asthenic disorders that have developed after suffering psychotic conditions in patients with CI.

Improvement of vertigo symptoms after 2 months of Vertigoheel treatment: a case series in patients with bilateral vestibulopathy and functional dizziness.

Background: Dizziness is a common leading symptom in bilateral vestibulopathy (BVP) and functional dizziness (FD), with significant negative effects on functional ability and quality of life. Vertigoheel is a widely used non-prescription drug for the treatment of vertigo. In order to generate systematic data for Vertigoheel in BVP and FD, we conducted a non-interventional study assessing vertigo symptoms. Methods: This study was conducted as an open-label, prospective, monocentric, non-interventional case series (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT05897853). Patients with BVP and FD received Vertigoheel according to market approval for an observational period of 2 months. Change from baseline after 2 months was assessed for the following endpoints: Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) as the primary endpoint, quality of life (QoL) by EQ-5D-5L, and body sway by static posturography. Patients with FD were additionally assessed for depression and anxiety by PHQ-9 and GAD-7 questionnaires. Patients with BVP were assessed for vestibular function by video head impulse testing and caloric testing. Adverse events and other safety-related observations were evaluated. Results: Of 41 patients with FD and 13 with BVP, two with FD and none with BVP dropped out before the follow-up visit. Both patient groups showed significantly improved disability caused by dizziness after 2 months: In BVP, the DHI decreased on average by 13.2 points from 45.4 to 32.2 (p < 0.001). In FD, the DHI decreased on average by 12.0 points from 46.5 to 34.5 (p < 0.001). In patients with FD, significant improvements were also observed for the secondary endpoints QoL, anxiety, and depression. No significant change was observed for posturography readouts. In patients with BVP, there were no statistically significant improvements for the secondary endpoints QoL, posturography, or vestibular function within the observation period. The study found no evidence of a safety risk. Conclusion: The study provides evidence for Vertigoheel's clinical safety and limited evidence - because of the non-interventional design - for its effectiveness in BVP and FD that are considered disease entities with high medical need for new treatment options. The results may serve as the basis for randomized placebo-controlled trials.

Tolerability and Safety of Sublingual Immunotherapy in Patients with Tree Pollen Allergy in Daily Practice-An Open, Prospective, Non-Interventional Study.

To investigate the tolerability and safety of two sublingual tree pollen extracts approved in 2018, a non-interventional study (NIS) was performed. This NIS was an 8-month observational study conducted at 84 sites throughout Germany. Study participants received either a sublingual liquid allergen extract of birch pollen (SBPE) or a liquid allergen extract consisting of a mixture of birch, hazel, and alder tree pollen (STPE). Data from 432 patients were analyzed for the occurrence of adverse events and patient compliance. At least one local reaction occurred in 69 (22.2%) patients, whereas systemic reactions were only observed in 27 (6.3%) patients. STPE-treated patients developed systemic reactions more frequently than SBPE-treated patients (SBPE: 9 (4.3%) vs. STPE: 18 (8.0%)). Only one patient developed a systemic grade III reaction. Severe systemic grade IV reactions were not observed. A total of 348 (98.6%) of the patients who completed all visits were satisfied or very satisfied with the sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT), and 322 (71%) patients completed all visits. Both investigated products were well tolerated by the patients and demonstrated a good safety profile. AEs were observed less frequently than in the preceding clinical phase III trial, and no new safety concerns were identified.

The INFINITY study protocol: a retrospective cohort study on decision making and clinical impact of biomarker-driven precision oncology in routine clinical practice.

BACKGROUND: Precision oncology, defined as treatment of patients with targeted therapies matched to specific molecular alterations, has entered routine clinical practice. Particularly in patients with advanced cancer or hematologic malignancies, for whom no further standard therapies are available, this approach is increasingly applied as last resort option outside of the approved indication. However, data on patient outcomes are not systematically collected, analyzed, reported, and shared. We have initiated the INFINITY registry to provide evidence from routine clinical practice to fill this knowledge gap. METHODS: INFINITY is a retrospective, non-interventional cohort study conducted at approximately 100 sites in Germany (office-based oncologists/hematologists and hospitals). We aim to include 500 patients with advanced solid tumors or hematologic malignancies who received a non-standard targeted therapy based on potentially actionable molecular alterations or biomarkers. INFINITY aims to provide insights into the use of precision oncology in routine clinical practice within Germany. We systematically collect details on patient and disease characteristics, molecular testing, clinical decision-making, treatment, and outcome. DISCUSSION: INFINITY will provide evidence on the current biomarker landscape driving treatment decisions in routine clinical care. It will also provide insights on effectiveness of precision oncology approaches in general, and of specific drug class/alteration matches used outside their approved indications. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04389541.

A multicentre, prospective, non-interventional study evaluating the safety of dapagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes in routine clinical practice in China (DONATE).

BACKGROUND: There are few large-scale studies evaluating the safety of the sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor, dapagliflozin, in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes. DONATE, a multicentre, single-arm, prospective, non-interventional study, is the first real-world study evaluating the safety of dapagliflozin in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes in routine clinical practice. METHODS: Between August 2017 and July 2020, patients with type 2 diabetes who had initiated dapagliflozin therapy and received ≥1 dose were prospectively recruited from 88 hospitals in China. Patients were subsequently followed up for 24 weeks; if patients discontinued dapagliflozin they were followed up for an additional 7 days after treatment discontinuation. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with adverse events and serious adverse events, particularly key adverse events of special interest (AESI) including urinary tract infection, genital tract infection (typical symptoms with or without microbiological diagnosis) and hypoglycaemia (typical symptoms with or without blood glucose ≤3.9 mmol/L, or blood glucose ≤3.9 mmol/L without symptoms). Exploratory outcomes included the absolute change in metabolic parameters and the proportion of patients with other AESI including volume depletion, abnormal blood electrolytes, polyuria, renal impairment, diabetic ketoacidosis, hepatic impairment and haematuria. RESULTS: A total of 3000 patients were enrolled, of whom 2990 (99.7%) were included in the safety analysis set. Mean (SD) age was 52.6 (12.0) years, and 65.8% of patients were male. Mean (SD) duration of type 2 diabetes at enrolment was 8.4 (7.1) years. Mean (SD) treatment duration of dapagliflozin was 209.1 (157.6) days. Adverse events were reported in 35.4% (n = 1059) of patients during the 24-week follow-up period. Overall, 9.0% (n = 268) were related to treatment and 6.2% (n = 186) were serious. Urinary tract infection, genital tract infection and hypoglycaemia were reported in 2.3% (n = 70), 1.3% (n = 39) and 1.1% (n = 32) of patients, respectively. The proportion of patients with other AESI was also low: polyuria (0.7%; n = 21), volume depletion (0.3%; n = 9), renal impairment (0.3%; n = 8), hepatic impairment (0.2%; n = 7), haematuria (0.2%; n = 6) and diabetic ketoacidosis (0.1%; n = 2). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that once-daily dapagliflozin was well tolerated in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes and the overall safety profile of dapagliflozin in clinical practice in China was consistent with that reported in clinical trials. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03156985. Registered on 16 May, 2017.

Association of diabetes, hypertension, and their combination with basal symptoms and treatment responses in overactive bladder patients.

Introduction: Pelvic hypoperfusion caused by atherosclerosis has been proposed as a cause of lower urinary tract dysfunction including overactive bladder syndrome (OAB). Limited data indicate that OAB patients with concomitant diabetes or hypertension, known risk factors of atherosclerosis, may exhibit greater baseline OAB symptoms and slightly smaller therapeutic responses to treatment, but the impact of a combined presence of diabetes and hypertension has not been reported. Therefore, we have explored whether the combined presence of both comorbidities is associated with greater baseline OAB symptoms than that of either comorbidity alone. Secondary questions were exploration of the impact of either comorbidity on baseline symptoms, and of the impact of either comorbidity alone and their combination on therapeutic responses. Methods: Data from two non-interventional studies applying treatment with propiverine ER 30 or 45 mg/d for 12 weeks were analyzed. Results: Number of urgency episodes in the combination group was greater than with each comorbidity alone. The impact of comorbidities on baseline intensity of incontinence, frequency or nocturia or Patient Perception of Bladder Condition was less consistent or absent. Either comorbidity alone was associated with a smaller % improvement of symptoms, and their combination had a greater effect than either alone. However, all attenuations associated with comorbidity were small relative to the overall improvement. Conclusions: We conclude that comorbidities of diabetes and hypertension have detectable effects on OAB symptoms and treatment responses, but the small magnitude of these alterations does not justify changing existing paradigms for the clinical management of OAB.

BPRS domains, items and subgroups analyses, and CGI-I ratings in pooled data from non-interventional studies of aripiprazole once-monthly in schizophrenia (REACT study).

BACKGROUND: Patients with schizophrenia may benefit from treatment with long-acting injectable (LAI) formulations of antipsychotics. Aripiprazole once-monthly (AOM) is an LAI that was tested in two non-interventional studies in Germany and Canada. METHODS: Here, we report on analyses of pooled data from the two non-interventional studies. Patients were treated with AOM under real-life conditions. Data were analyzed for a timeframe of 6 months. We analyzed data on Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) domains and items, BPRS total scores in various patient subgroups (male vs. female patients, patients with disease duration ≤ 5 years and > 5 years, patients with different levels of disease severity at baseline), Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) ratings for the total population and subgroups, and comorbidities for the total population. RESULTS: Data from 409 patients were included. 65.5% of the patients had comorbidities. Improvements were found in all BPRS domains and items. Furthermore, improvements were similar for male and female patients, patients with disease duration ≤ 5 years and > 5 years, and across different levels of disease severity at baseline. Numerically, more favorable results were found for younger patients, female patients, and those with shorter disease duration. CONCLUSIONS: AOM can be an effective treatment in the broad range of patients, across sexes, regardless of patient age and duration of disease, independently of disease severity, and across symptoms. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02131415 (May 6, 2014), vfa non-interventional studies registry 15960N.

Combined analysis of five non-interventional studies of the effectiveness, tolerability, and safety of the extrafine fixed dose beclomethasone/formoterol combination in the treatment of asthma in Austria.

OBJECTIVE: The real-world effectiveness and tolerability of an extrafine fixed dose beclomethasone/formoterol (BDP/FF) treatment of patients with partially or non-controlled asthma was evaluated in five non-interventional studies (NISs) from Austria. METHODS: Asthma patients enrolled in these five NISs were treated with beclomethasone/formoterol (Foster® or Foster® Nexthaler®) as maintenance and reliever over 12 weeks. Asthma control, lung function and symptom scores were assessed at baseline, after 4-8 weeks and at the end of the investigations in week 12. In addition, tolerability and handling of the devices were evaluated by questionnaires. RESULTS: The combined analysis included 891 patients (53% female, aged 49.3 years) demonstrating significant improvements in asthma control, lung function parameters (PEF, FEV1 and FVC) and symptom scores (reduction of breathlessness, wheezing, chest tightness and cough). These changes were already detectable after 4-8 weeks. The treatment was effective irrespective of smoking status, exercise, or previous medication. Tolerability of the therapy with extrafine BDP/FF was rated as "very good" or "good" in 98% of the patients. 95% of the patients intended to continue the treatment, and nearly all (99%) rated the handling of the device as "very good" or "good". No serious adverse reactions were reported. CONCLUSIONS: This combined analysis of five non-interventional studies confirms the effectiveness and tolerability of the extrafine fixed-dose BDP/FF combination (Foster® and Foster® Nexthaler®) in a heterogenous patient population suffering from partially or non-controlled asthma. Therapy was associated with a high patient satisfaction and the absence of serious adverse reactions.

Subcutaneous rituximab in patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma and follicular lymphoma: Final results of the non-interventional study MabSCale.

BACKGROUND: Rituximab has become a standard treatment for non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Clinical studies have demonstrated the efficacy of rituximab in combination with standard chemotherapies in the treatment of follicular lymphoma (FL) and diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients. This non-interventional study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of subcutaneous (SC) rituximab in routine clinical practice. METHODS: Adult patients with previously untreated CD20 positive DLBCL or FL who received rituximab SC and chemotherapy as first-line treatment were observed between 07/2014 and 07/2019 at 99 institutions in Germany. Primary endpoint was the (unconfirmed) complete remission (CR/CRu) rate. Primary outcome was analyzed inferentially; other variables were evaluated descriptively. RESULTS: Overall 583 patients (247 FL; 336 DLBCL) were evaluated. CR/CRu rates were 51.4% (95% CI: 45.2; 57.6) in the FL set and 48.5% (95% CI: 43.2; 53.8) in the DLBCL set. Regarding progression-free survival in the FL group, the probability of being event-free was 94.2% in the first year and 86.2% in the second year. An overall response was achieved in 85.8% (FL) and 85.4% patients (DLBCL). Patient satisfaction at the end of study with the time saving simplification of the SC vs. intravenous route was 98% for FL and 97% for DLBCL. 45.3% of FL and 47.0% of DLBCL patients experienced an adverse event of grade ≥3. Serious adverse events of grade ≥3 occurred in 27.9% FL and 32.4% DLBCL patients, with the highest incidences for leucopenia, anemia, nausea, and fatigue. No new safety signals were detected. CONCLUSIONS: The results confirmed the effectiveness and safety of rituximab SC in both the FL and the DLBCL group. Satisfaction of patients and nurses with SC administration was high.

Weak association between arterial hypertension and overactive bladder baseline symptoms and treatment responses.

While animal studies have suggested an association between the presence of hypertension and the presence and/or severity of overactive bladder syndrome (OAB) symptoms, little clinical data is available. We have conducted a pre-specified secondary analysis of a non-interventional study involving 4450 OAB patients being treated with solifenacin to explore the existence of an association between OAB and hypertension using three parallel and overlapping definitions of hypertension to enhance robustness of analysis. Regardless of definition, patients with hypertension were older and had greater OAB symptom severity in univariate analyses. In multiple regression models including age as explanatory covariate, most relationships held up but effect sizes of concomitant hypertension on OAB severity were small (odds ratios <1.35 in all cases) and were deemed to be unlikely of clinical relevance. % Changes in symptom severity were somewhat smaller in univariate analysis, but effect sizes were small. We conclude that OAB and arterial hypertension are associated but effect sizes are too small to justify adaptation of clinical practice for OAB patients with concomitant hypertension.

The Non-Interventional PAZOREAL Study to Assess the Effectiveness and Safety of Pazopanib in a Real-Life Setting: Reflecting a Changing mRCC Treatment Landscape.

The approval of tyrosine kinase inhibitors and checkpoint inhibitors represented a remarkable progression in the therapeutic landscape for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Yet, in the ever-evolving landscape of mRCC treatment, real-world data on these agents, including pazopanib, are scarce. The non-interventional PAZOREAL study investigated the effectiveness and safety of pazopanib (first-line), nivolumab (second-line), and everolimus (second- and third-line) in a real-life setting. The multicentric study included 376 mRCC patients who received first-line treatment with pazopanib and assessed time on the drug (primary endpoint), overall survival, best responses, disease control rates, as well as safety signals and health-related quality of life. The median overall time on the drug was 10.0 months, with first-line pazopanib having a median time on drug of 6.3 months. The median overall survival was 35.9 months. The disease control rate for first-line pazopanib was 56.9%. No new safety signals were detected. PAZOREAL provides valuable real-world data for first-line treatment with pazopanib.

Functional gastrointestinal disorders in children: Effectivity, safety, and tolerability of the herbal preparation STW-5 (Iberogast®) in general practice.

BACKGROUND: Functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGIDs) of the upper and lower digestive system in children and adolescents present with heterogeneous gastrointestinal symptoms and are a common reason for specialist consultations. The herbal medicinal preparation STW-5 has already shown efficacy and safety in clinical studies with more than 7000 adult participants suffering from functional dyspepsia (FD) or irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Here, we evaluate with a prospective observational study the effectivity and safety of STW-5 in children with FGID under real-life conditions and interpret these data versus the background of controlled clinical studies in a predominantly adult population. METHODS: This prospective observational study included 980 children (age 3-14 years) with FGID. For inclusion, Rome III criteria were recommended to apply. The inclusion of the patients for treatment with STW-5 followed routine clinical practice. Patients were treated for approximately 1 week. The presence and severity of symptoms was documented at the study start and at the end of treatment period utilizing the adapted gastrointestinal symptom score (GIS). Other target parameters included global effectivity and tolerability assessments as well as adverse events. RESULTS: The average patient age was 7.6 ± 2.9 years. Most of the patients were treated for IBS (n = 418; 43 %) or FD (n = 259; 26 %), with a mean baseline GIS of 16.1 ± 8.9. During the treatment period, the GIS decreased 76 % to 3.8 ± 4.2. The decrease in symptoms was similar for different age groups, gender, and indications. Patients with a shorter duration of complaints had a lower GIS at study end (p < 0.0001. The global treatment effect was assessed as good or very good by 87-89 % of patients/parents and physicians. Physicians rated the global tolerability as good or very good for 95 % of the patients. Seven patients (0.7 %) reported adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: The treatment effect of STW-5 in this study was in its range comparable to according data from controlled clinical trials with predominantly adult participants.Thus, supporting robustness of these data generated in an uncontrolled observational setting. The results of this observational study indicate that STW-5 may be an effective and well tolerated treatment option also for children with FGIDs.

Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Carcinoma with Bevacizumab in First-Line and beyond First Progression: The KORALLE Non-Interventional Cohort Study.

INTRODUCTION: The non-interventional study (NIS) KORALLE evaluated the effectiveness and safety of bevacizumab in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma (mCRC) treated with bevacizumab in combination with fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy in the first-line setting and beyond first progression in routine clinical practice. METHODS: This prospective, multicenter NIS observed adult patients with mCRC who started first-line bevacizumab therapy. The planned maximum duration of observation per patient was 21 months. The primary effectiveness variable was progression-free survival in the first-line therapy setting (PFS-1). Secondary effectiveness variables included PFS after first progression as well as overall survival and overall response rate. All analyses were carried out descriptively for the full analysis population set (FAS). Effectiveness analyses were also assessed for predefined subgroups based on therapy goals. RESULTS: Between December 2012 and July 2016, 2,429 eligible patients were observed at 314 sites in Germany. In the first-line setting in the FAS, the median PFS-1 was 10.3 months (95% CI: 9.9; 10.8), the median overall survival was 16.9 months (95% CI: 16.3; 17.5), and the overall response rate (ORR-1) was 44.2% (95% CI: 41.6%; 46.8%). Effectiveness results of all subgroups were similar to the FAS. Overall, 80.9% of patients experienced any adverse events, 36.6% of patients experienced serious adverse events, and 8.8% of patients experienced fatal adverse events. CONCLUSION: The NIS KORALLE provided broad real-world evidence on effectiveness and safety of bevacizumab. Despite different treatment intentions, the combination of bevacizumab plus fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy was similarly effective in all subgroups in routine clinical practice. The safety information reported in this study is consistent with the known safety profile of bevacizumab.

Rationale and design of ON-TRK: a novel prospective non-interventional study in patients with TRK fusion cancer treated with larotrectinib.

BACKGROUND: Tropomyosin receptor kinase (TRK) fusion proteins resulting from neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase (NTRK) gene fusions are rare primary oncogenic drivers in a wide array of tumors. Larotrectinib is a first-in-class, highly selective, central nervous system-active TRK inhibitor approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), European Medicines Agency (EMA), and over 40 countries for the treatment of TRK fusion solid tumors in adult and pediatric patients. Due to the rarity of TRK fusion cancer, larotrectinib was granted accelerated approval based on a relatively small number of patients enrolled in three early phase trials. ON-TRK aims to evaluate the safety profile of larotrectinib in a broader population and over extended time periods. METHODS: ON-TRK is a prospective, non-interventional, open-label, multicenter, multi-cohort, post-approval study in adult and pediatric patients with locally advanced or metastatic TRK fusion cancer treated with larotrectinib that will describe the safety and effectiveness of larotrectinib in real-world practice conditions. Adult patients will be grouped by tumor type and followed for at least 2 years. Patients < 18 years old will be enrolled under a 'pediatric' cohort regardless of tumor type and will be followed for 5 years to evaluate the risk of potential long-term adverse effects of larotrectinib on their growth and development. The effectiveness of larotrectinib in the overall study population as well as in patient subgroups will also be evaluated. Procedures avoided in patients with infantile fibrosarcoma (e.g., amputation) and the number of patients who were able to undergo surgery with a curative intent (excluding amputation) because of the use of larotrectinib will be described. Larotrectinib treatment patterns in real-world practice, including dosing and duration of treatment, will be described. DISCUSSION: The FDA Accelerated Approval Program allows for earlier approval of and patient access to drugs that treat serious conditions and fill an unmet medical need. This study is designed to fulfill post-approval requirements set by the FDA as well as post-marketing requirements set forth by local regulatory bodies and is part of the risk management plan for the EMA. STUDY REGISTRATION: This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT04142437 ). PROTOCOL VERSION: v2.5, 25 March 2021.