Breaking bad news: an active learning method for medical students.

BACKGROUND: Breaking bad news is one of the most difficult aspects of communication in medicine. The objective of this study was to assess the relevance of a novel active learning course on breaking bad news for fifth-year students. METHODS: Students were divided into two groups: Group 1, the intervention group, participated in a multidisciplinary formative discussion workshop on breaking bad news with videos, discussions with a pluri-professional team, and concluding with the development of a guide on good practice in breaking bad news through collective intelligence; Group 2, the control group, received no additional training besides conventional university course. The relevance of discussion-group-based active training was assessed in a summative objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) station particularly through the students' communication skills. RESULTS: Thirty-one students were included: 17 in Group 1 and 14 in Group 2. The mean (range) score in the OSCE was significantly higher in Group 1 than in Group 2 (10.49 out of 15 (7; 13) vs. 7.80 (4.75; 12.5), respectively; p = 0.0007). The proportion of students assessed by the evaluator to have received additional training in breaking bad news was 88.2% (15 of the 17) in Group 1 and 21.4% (3 of the 14) in Group 2 (p = 0.001). The intergroup differences in the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale and Jefferson Scale of Empathy scores were not significant, and both scores were not correlated with the students' self-assessed score for success in the OSCE. CONCLUSION: Compared to the conventional course, this new active learning method for breaking bad news was associated with a significantly higher score in a summative OSCE. A longer-term validation study is needed to confirm these exploratory data.

Exploring Factors Influencing Patients' Embarrassment and Feelings of Imposition in Objective Structured Clinical Examination Interactions.

OBJECTIVE: To identify factors influencing patient responses in potentially sensitive situations that might lead to embarrassment (defined by politeness theory (PT) as positive face-threatening acts [FTAs]) or a sense of imposition (defined by PT as negative FTAs) during Objective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCEs) and to assess the participant's ability to mitigate such situations. METHODS: Nineteen OSCE video recordings of 10 pharmacy trainees interacting with mock patients were examined using the PT framework. All relevant participants' speech acts were coded and quantified into type of FTAs and the mitigation strategies used. Patient (assessor) responses were classified then quantified into preferred responses (ie, quick response) vs dispreferred (ie, delayed or hesitant responses) using conversation analysis. The chi-square test was used to identify any association between relevant variables according to predefined hypotheses using SPSS version 27. RESULTS: A total of 848 FTAs were analyzed. Participants failed to meet patient face needs in 32.4% of positive FTAs, in 11.5% of negative FTAs, and 44.4% of positive and negative FTAs. Although patients disclosing information about any inappropriate lifestyle behavior (as per OSCE scripts) expressed these via dispreferred mannerisms, participants were less likely to provide patients with reassurance when patient face needs were challenged in this way (68.2% of these dispreferred responses were not given reassuring feedback) than when they were maintained. CONCLUSION: Improving educational programs to include the context of patient face needs and conversational strategies for properly dealing with highly sensitive situations was suggested as a way to equip trainees with the skills to effectively build rapport with patients.

Internship Preparatory Clinical Course: A Timed-Station Approach to Bridging the Theory-to-Practice Gap.

BACKGROUND: Medical students' transition to internship has a discernible gap in structured preparation, particularly in practical skill application. We introduced the internship preparatory clinical course (IPCC) to address this gap.  Methods: The course was conducted at the clinical skills and simulation center at King Saud University Medical City and included a total of eight skills distributed across four stations. It employs a timed-station methodology, inspired by the Observed Structured Clinical Examination, but innovatively adapted as a teaching method. Participants were exposed to various stations, such as suturing techniques, interactive mannequins for anatomical structure demonstration, real ultrasound machines on simulated patients, IV cannulation, and urinary catheterization. To facilitate active learning, participants received course materials a day prior, equipped with QR codes for quick reference. Instructors emphasized on-the-spot review, fostering an environment where learners actively engage. Toward the end of the course, after internship a follow-up survey was administered to obtain feedback, achieving a response rate of 83% (n=45/54). RESULTS: Feedback from the course was overwhelmingly positive, with 91.1% (n=41/45) rating the course as 7 and above out of 10. Participants expressed a higher degree of confidence in providing wound care (Median: 8, IQR: 2) and inserting or removing a Foley catheter (Median: 8, IQR: 4). Lower confidence was observed in stoma examination and care (Median: 5, IQR: 4). During their internships, participants reported that 100% (n=45/45) utilized suturing skills, 48.9% (n=22/45) performed focused assessment with sonography in trauma (FAST) examinations, and 62.2% (n=28/45) attempted nasogastric tube insertions. Additionally, 88.9% (n=40/45) performed wound examinations, 77.8% (n=35/45) provided wound care and dressing, 37.8% (n=17/45) performed abscess drainage, 51.1% (n=23/45) removed and 37.8% (n=17/45) inserted a Foley catheter, and 20% (n=9/45) provided stoma care. CONCLUSION: The IPCC effectively addresses the existing gap in medical education, bridging the theory-to-practice divide. The innovative use of the timed-station approach emphasizes the importance of active learning. Our results signify the importance of simulation training, as most interns acknowledge the positive impact of the course on their internship. We recommend preparing pre-interns for internships by giving special consideration to the procedural aspects as most associated with medical errors. The timed-station approach can improve cost-effectiveness and enhance responsibility-driven learning.

10. Policy on Reasonable Accommodations for Medical Students with Disabilities in Common Achievement Tests / 医学教育

The Common Achievement Tests for medical students consists of Computer Based Testing (CBT) conducted before clinical training, and Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) conducted before and after clinical training. Since the publicization of the Common Achievement Tests for medical students before clinical training in 2023, the Committee for Reasonable Accommodation has been established within the Common Achievement Tests Organization (CATO), where reasonable accommodations for each exam are being considered. Reasonable accommodations begin with an assessment based on requests from candidates and proceed through constructive dialogue between candidates and universities. Additionally, recordings of practical training sessions are provided to facilitate objective assessments, enabling the provision of reasonable accommodations tailored to candidates’ participation in clinical training and internships, thereby ensuring smooth examination processes.

Use of Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) in a hybrid digital / in-person training for hormonal IUD in Nigeria: findings and applications of the approach.

Background: The hormonal intrauterine device, a long-acting reversible contraceptive method, is being introduced to pilot sites in the private and public sector in Nigeria by the Nigerian Federal Ministry of Health since 2019. To inform training of health care providers, a study was conducted on a hybrid digital and in-person training which utilized Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) to assess competency of provider trainees. This study represents one of few documented experiences using OSCE to assess the effectiveness of a digital training. Methods: From September - October 2021, in Enugu, Kano and Oyo states of Nigeria, 62 health care providers from public and private sector health facilities were trained in hormonal IUD service provision using a hybrid digital / in-person training approach. Providers, who were skilled in provision of copper IUD, underwent a didactic component using digital modules, followed by an in-person practicum, and finally supervised service provision in the provider trainee's workplace. Skills were assessed using OSCE during the one-day practicum. Results: Use of the OSCE to assess skills provided valuable information to study team. The performance of provider trainees was high (average 94% correct completion of steps in the OSCE). Conclusions: OSCE was used as a research methodology as part of this pilot study; to date, OSCE has not been integrated into the training approach to be scaled up by FMOH. Uniformly high performance of provider trainees was seen on the OSCE, unsurprising since provider trainees were experienced in providing copper IUD. If and when training is rolled out to providers inexperienced with copper IUD, OSCE may have a more important role to assess skills before service provision. The role of OSCE in design of hybrid digital / in-person training approaches should be further explored in rollout of hormonal IUD and other contraceptive technologies.

Feasibility and reliability of the pandemic-adapted online-onsite hybrid graduation OSCE in Japan.

Objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) is widely used to assess medical students' clinical skills. Virtual OSCEs were used in place of in-person OSCEs during the COVID-19 pandemic; however, their reliability is yet to be robustly analyzed. By applying generalizability (G) theory, this study aimed to evaluate the reliability of a hybrid OSCE, which admixed in-person and online methods, and gain insights into improving OSCEs' reliability. During the 2020-2021 hybrid OSCEs, one examinee, one rater, and a vinyl mannequin for physical examination participated onsite, and a standardized simulated patient (SP) for medical interviewing and another rater joined online in one virtual breakout room on an audiovisual conferencing system. G-coefficients and 95% confidence intervals of the borderline score, namely border zone (BZ), under the standard 6-station, 2-rater, and 6-item setting were calculated. G-coefficients of in-person (2017-2019) and hybrid OSCEs (2020-2021) under the standard setting were estimated to be 0.624, 0.770, 0.782, 0.759, and 0.823, respectively. The BZ scores were estimated to be 2.43-3.57, 2.55-3.45, 2.59-3.41, 2.59-3.41, and 2.51-3.49, respectively, in the score range from 1 to 6. Although hybrid OSCEs showed reliability comparable to in-person OSCEs, they need further improvement as a very high-stakes examination. In addition to increasing clinical vignettes, having more proficient online/on-demand raters and/or online SPs for medical interviews could improve the reliability of OSCEs. Reliability can also be ensured through supplementary examination and by increasing the number of online raters for a small number of students within the BZs.

An Applied Linguistics Study of How Students Prevent Embarrassments and Impositions During Interactive Examination OSCEs.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of politeness strategies used by pharmacy students to avoid embarrassing or imposing on others during objective structured clinical examinations. METHODS: A total of 19 objective structured clinical examinations video recordings of 10 students (participants) interacting with mock patients were examined using the framework of Politeness Theory (PT). All relevant participant acts (speech activities) were coded using PT into (1) type of face threatening acts (ie, potentially sensitive situations-as regarded by PT) and (2) politeness strategies used to mitigate them. Conversation Analysis was then used to examine the effectiveness of conversational strategies by judging the 'patient' responses to these strategies. RESULTS: Most acts had the potential to impact patients' negative face needs (ie, desire to act autonomously, eg, upon the practitioner making a request), positive face needs (ie, desire to be liked, eg, upon the practitioner making a diagnosis), or both. Despite applying a variety of positive politeness strategies (eg, avoiding disagreement, or expressing understanding) to prevent embarrassment to the patient, and negative politeness strategies (eg, being indirect, using hedging, or minimizing the imposition) to avoid directly imposing on them, "dispreferred responses" showed participants mostly focused on avoiding impositions, corresponding to what they have been taught, rather embarrassments. CONCLUSION: Participants were less aware that discussing sensitive topics could cause embarrassment to patients, with the potential to upset them. Developing teaching and evaluation methods to consider patients' face needs could help in assessing and improving pharmacy students' communication skills.

Undergraduate Skills Training in Pandemic Times: Where Is the Future of Medical Education?

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic forced medical programs to rapidly switch to remote teaching from scratch, impacting hands-on skills training. This study compared the efficacy of a hybrid online format to a regular in-person session for a mandatory surgical skills class. METHODS: Third-year undergraduate medical students attending the surgical skills class in the winter semester of 2020/21 at the Medical University of Graz were randomly assigned to either the hybrid or in-person class, depending on their course schedule and government regulations. The hybrid class involved online videos, one-on-one peer tutoring, and an Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE). Pre- and post-class self-assessments were conducted to evaluate their theoretical and practical knowledge of a single interrupted suture. RESULTS: The study included 85 students in the regular in-person class and 50 in the hybrid class. A pre-class assessment revealed higher self-assessments in the hybrid class for theoretical and practical knowledge, but a post-class assessment showed no significant difference. The advantages and disadvantages of both modalities were identified, providing valuable insights for future curriculum development. CONCLUSIONS: Both teaching modes were effective for undergraduate surgical skills training. This study recommends implementing positive aspects of both the hybrid and in-person formats while recognizing their respective limitations.

A Telehealth Module and Virtual Objective Structured Clinical Examination of Health Literacy in Pharmacy Education.

OBJECTIVE: To implement an online health literacy (HL) module and evaluate its impact through virtual Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) on students' abilities to manage patients with low HL. METHODS: Students virtually engaged in several learning activities related to HL, including practicing using HL assessment tools, designing an information booklet suitable for low HL patients, using readability formulas to lower text readability level to ≤ sixth grade, role-playing scenarios related to HL, and undergoing a virtual OSCE. Student performance on course assessments was tested using Spearman's rank-order. Students evaluated their OSCE experience in terms of case content, virtual assessment, and logistics; and effectiveness of the HL module and confidence related to HL. RESULTS: A total of 90 students completed the virtual OSCE; the mean score was 8.8 out of 10 (88%), which correlated with similar course assessments. The average score was 3.46 out of 3.7 for the "gathering information" domain (recognizing risk factors and behaviors, assessing HL and adherence, etc.), and 4.06 out of 4.9 for the "patient management" domain (counseling patients on taking medications, focusing on repeating key messages, offering adherence interventions, etc.). Students responded positively regarding case content and virtual assessment, but less favorably regarding logistics. Feedback on effectiveness of the HL module and confidence in managing patients with low HL was positive. CONCLUSION: An HL module delivered online was effective in improving student knowledge, abilities, and confidence related to HL. Students achieved high scores in all items in the virtual OSCE, and considered it a measure of communication and clinical skills that is comparable to traditional in-room assessments.

Formative Objective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCEs) as an Assessment Tool in UK Undergraduate Medical Education: A Review of Its Utility.

The Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) is a globally established clinical examination; it is often considered the gold standard in evaluating clinical competence within medicine and other healthcare professionals' educations alike. The OSCE consists of a circuit of multiple stations testing a multitude of clinical competencies expected of undergraduate students at certain levels throughout training. Despite its widespread use, the evidence regarding formative renditions of the examination in medical training is highly variable; thus, its suitability as an assessment has been challenged for various reasons. Classically, Van Der Vleuten's formula of utility has been adopted in the appraisal of assessment methods as means of testing, including the OSCE. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the literature surrounding the formative use of OSCEs in undergraduate medical training, whilst specifically focusing on the constituents of the equation and means of mitigating factors that compromise its objectivity.

A clinical medicine level test at Jinan University School of Medicine reveals the importance of training medical students in clinical history-taking.

Backgrounds: Training in the basic interview skills of clinical history-taking has always been a significant component of medical education. Purpose: This study was designed to identify the factors influence medical students' history-taking skills learning and develop a way to improve these skills. Methods: We firstly analysed the academic performance of medical students at Jinan University School of Medicine in different disciplines of the Clinical Medicine Level Test (CMLT), to ensure the students have obtained comprehensive medical education prior to beginning their clinical internships. Next, we conducted a survey among the CMLT participants to seek the underlying causes and corresponding measures to improve history-taking in the future. Before these medical students entered their fifth-year clinical practice, we finally provide them with pre-internship training, including the history-taking workshops with standard patients (SP). Results: The analysis of the clinical skill sections of the CMLT revealed that the students performed significantly better on clinical operations from multiple disciplines than on medical history-taking. Principal component analysis of the survey questionnaire indicated that the capability of history-taking, course assessments, and awareness of the value of medical history-taking emerged as the key factors forming a cohesive clue for sustaining history-taking implementation. The intervention workshops of employing SP had a positive impact, as evidenced by the students' feedback and suggestions for improving their ability of history-taking. Conclusions: This study suggests that strengthening of medical history-taking training is indispensable for training qualified medical students. Workshops with SP is a successful teaching strategy for practicing history-taking, allowing students to spot minute errors and training communication skills.

Objective structured clinical examination: Do first-year nursing students perceive it to be stressful?

BACKGROUND:  The Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) is widely accepted as an effective means of assessing clinical competence and nursing skills. There is, however, little existing knowledge on how first-year nursing students perceived stress during their first OSCE. OBJECTIVES:  To determine the perception of stress; to identify the perceived factors causing stress; and to determine the perceived incidence of stress. METHOD:  A descriptive, survey was conducted on a sample of 82 first-year nursing students using the Perceived Stress Scale (PPS). RESULTS:  The results showed that more than half (n = 54) of students perceived stress at moderate levels. Students not having sufficient time to complete the OSCE was perceived as the main factor causing stress (mean = 22.04; standard deviation [s.d.] = 6.21). The correlation between perception of stress and perceived factors causing stress showed a significant weak positive linear correlation among the variables (r = 0.45; p  0.05). CONCLUSION:  The study findings are important as the data determining the first-year nursing students' perception of stress were collected immediately after their first OSCE, which may indicate that perception of stress was related to the actual event rather than the preparation for the OSCE. A follow-up qualitative research study should be conducted, preferably in the same setting, so that the students' experiences of stress during the first OSCE can be explored in depth.

Are we ready yet for digital transformation? Virtual versus on-campus OSCE as assessment tools in pharmacy education. A randomized controlled head-to-head comparative assessment.

Background: The global COVID-19 pandemic has influenced pharmacy education including learning, assessment, and exams. In the UAE, pharmacy instructors have adapted several innovative teaching methods to strive for quality learning outcomes. The current trial presented a head-to-head comparative assessment between on-campus versus virtual Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) with examiners' and students' perspectives. Aim: The main aim was to compare fourth-year students' and examiners' perceptions of the feasibility (time and logistics), stress, performance, and satisfaction between on-campus versus virtual OSCE. Method: A randomized controlled head-to-head comparative assessment between the On-campus and virtual OSCE was conducted to explore performance and satisfaction of pharmacy students and examiners towards the two OSCE settings. The virtual OSCE was carried out directly after the on-campus -OSCE and the setting was designed in a way that aligned with the on-campus OSCE but in a virtual way. Microsoft Teams® breakout room was used as a virtual stations. Respondus-lockdown-browse and Google Meet® were used for proctoring purposes. Results: Students who sat for the on-campus assessment were more satisfied with the instructions, the orientation session, the time management, and the overall exam setting, the ability of the exam to assess their communication and clinical skills, professionalism and attitude, and the interactivity of the exam compared to the students who sat for the virtual assessment. Examiners' perceptions for both settings were the same with the exception of interaction with students (p less than 0.05) as the on-campus OSCE was more interactive. Conclusion: Students still prefer the on-campus OSCE to the virtual OSCE format in many aspects. Nevertheless, virtual OSCE is still a feasible and satisfactory method of assessment when on-campus OSCE is not possible. There is a need of a specialized platform to conduct the virtual OSCE from A to Z rather than maximizing the use of options in the current digital platforms.

Adapting an Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) on Conducting Difficult Conversations Between Nephrology Fellows and Patients to a Virtual Platform: A Research Letter.

Background: We previously described a nephrology-specific "Breaking Bad News" Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) assessing nephrology fellow communication and counseling skills in 3 scenarios: kidney replacement therapy (KRT) in kidney failure, urgent KRT in acute kidney injury (AKI), and kidney biopsy (KBx). Objective: The main objectives of this study is to adapt the OSCE to a virtual platform, simulating nephrology patient telemedicine encounters involving difficult conversations, and to assess fellow and faculty satisfaction with the virtual format. Design: Description of a formative telemedicine simulation for nephrology fellows. Setting: Fully virtual simulation conducted by 2 academic medical simulation centers. Participants: Nephrology faculty and fellows at 3 urban/suburban training programs in the eastern United States. Measurements: Description of the virtual OSCE process. Fellow and faculty satisfaction overall and for each scenario. Faculty and fellow estimates of frequency of virtual patient encounters in the past year. Methods: The OSCE consisted of 3 scenarios: KRT in kidney failure, urgent KRT in AKI, and KBx. Objective Structured Clinical Examinations were administered in May 2021. Each scenario lasted 20 minutes. The AKI scenario was audio only. Fellows telephoned a simulated patient surrogate for urgent KRT consent. Kidney failure and KBx scenarios were video encounters. Faculty observed while muted/video off. Immediately after the OSCE, fellows and faculty were anonymously surveyed regarding their satisfaction with each scenario, the OSCE overall, and their estimate of outpatient encounters and inpatient KRT counseling done virtually in the preceding year. Results: Seventeen fellows completed the OSCE at 2 centers (3 programs). Sixteen (94%) completed the survey. Almost 94% rated the OSCE as a good/very good approximation of telemedicine encounters. Those satisfied/very satisfied with each scenario are as follow: 100% for AKI, 75% for kidney failure, and 75% for KBx. Two commented that they often did urgent KRT counseling by telephone. Fellows estimated a median 20% (interquartile range: 175, 50%) of counseling for acute inpatient KRT and a median 50% (IQR: 33.75, 70%) of outpatient encounters were virtual in the prior year. Two (regarding the kidney failure and KBx scenarios) indicated they would not have counseled similar outpatients virtually. Limitations: The 15-minute interactions may be too short to allow the encounter to be completed comfortably. A small number of programs and fellows participated, and programs were located in urban/suburban areas on the east coast of the United States. Conclusions: Overall, fellows felt that the OSCE was a good approximation of virtual encounters. The OSCE is an opportunity for fellows to practice telemedicine communication skills.

Contexte: Nous avions précédemment décrit un examen clinique objectif structuré (ECOS) de type « annonce d'une mauvaise nouvelle ¼ en néphrologie afin d'évaluer les compétences en communication et consultation des résidents en néphrologie. L'ECOS comportait trois scénarios: thérapie de remplacement rénal (TRR) pour l'insuffisance rénale, TRR urgente dans les cas d'insuffisance rénale aiguë (IRA), et biopsie du rein (BxR). Objectifs: Adapter l'ECOS à une plateforme virtuelle, simuler des rencontres de télémédecine impliquant des conversations difficiles avec des patients en néphrologie, et évaluer la satisfaction des résidents en néphrologie et du corps enseignant à l'égard du format virtuel. Conception: Description d'une simulation de télémédecine pour la formation des résidents en néphrologie. Cadre: Des simulations entièrement virtuelles réalisées dans deux centers universitaires de simulation médicale. Participants: Les professeurs et les résidents en néphrologie de trois programs de formation urbains/suburbains de l'est des États-Unis. Mesures: Description du processus de l'ECOS virtuel. Satisfaction générale des résidents en néphrologie et du corps enseignant pour chacun des scénarios. Estimation, par les professeurs et les résidents, de la fréquence des rencontres virtuelles avec des patients au cours de la dernière année. Méthodologie: L'ECOS était composé de trois scénarios: TRR en insuffisance rénale; TRR urgente en contexte d'IRA et biopsie rénale. Les ECOS ont été réalisés en mai 2021. Chaque scénario durait 20 minutes. Le scénario IRA était audio uniquement; les boursiers devaient téléphoner à un patient simulé afin d'obtenir un consentement pour une TRR urgente. Les scénarios pour l'insuffisance rénale terminale et la BxR étaient sous forme de rencontres vidéo. Les professeurs observaient les scénarios en sourdine/hors vidéo. Immédiatement après l'ECOS, les résidents en néphrologie et les professeurs ont été interrogés de façon anonyme sur leur satisfaction à l'égard de chaque scénario et de l'ECOS dans son ensemble. Ils ont également été invités à estimer le nombre de consultations externes et de conseils prodigués sur la TRR à des patients hospitalisés au cours de l'année précédente. Résultats: Dix-sept résidents en néphrologie ont complété l'ECOS dans les deux centers (trois programs) et seize (94 %) ont répondu au sondage. La très grande majorité (94 %) a évalué l'ECOS comme une bonne/très bonne simulation des rencontres de télémédecine. Le taux de personnes satisfaites/très satisfaites s'établissait à 100 % pour le scénario de l'IRA, à 75 % pour celui de l'insuffisance rénale terminale et à 75 % pour celui de la BxR. Deux personnes ont dit faire régulièrement des consultations par téléphone pour la TRR urgente. Les résidents en néphrologie ont estimé que 20 %, (proportion médiane) ÉIQ= 175; 50 %, des consultations avec des patients hospitalisés et 50 %, (proportion médiane) ÉIQ = 33,75; 70 %, des consultations externes avaient été faites virtuellement au cours de l'année précédente. Pour les scénarios d'insuffisance rénale terminale et de BxR, deux personnes ont indiqué qu'elles ne feraient pas de consultations virtuelles pour ces patients. Limites: Les interactions de 15 minutes sont probablement trop courtes pour compléter confortablement la rencontre. Un faible nombre de programs et de résidents en néphrologie ont participé. Les programs évalués se situaient en zones urbaines et suburbaines de la côte est des États-Unis. Conclusion: Dans l'ensemble, les résidents en néphrologie ont estimé que l'ECOS était une bonne représentation des rencontres virtuelles. L'ECOS est une occasion pour les résidents de mettre en pratique leurs compétences en communication dans un contexte de télémédecine.

Virtual reality as a learning tool for improving infection control procedures.

BACKGROUND: Hand hygiene and donning personal protective equipment (PPE) are essential techniques for infection control; however, low compliance is an issue. The effectiveness of virtual reality (VR) in learning infection control procedures is unknown. METHODS: To verify the effectiveness of VR, medical students were categorized into VR or lecture groups (n=21 each). Each group was given the same curricular content; one group received the training through VR learning using a fully-immersive 360-degree video and the other was conventional lecture-style learning. Before and after the training, they were evaluated for the implementation of hand hygiene and PPE using an Objective Structured Clinical Examination method. Post-test questionnaires were administered. RESULTS: The scores for hand hygiene, donning PPE, and the total score increased after learning in both groups. There was no difference between the pre-test total scores of the two groups (7 [5-9] vs 6 [5-7.5], P=.352); however, the VR group had significantly higher post-test total scores than the lecture group (12 [9.5-12] vs 9 [8-12], P=.024). More students in the VR group responded that they enjoyed the training and would like to use the same learning method next time. CONCLUSIONS: VR can be a useful tool for learning and practicing appropriate infection control procedures.

An analysis of current status of research on objective structured clinical examination in China and globally based on knowledge graph / 中华医学教育探索杂志

To investigate the research status and trends of application of objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) in medical education in China and globally, and to provide a reference for clinical teaching and medical education research. CNKI and Web of Science Core Collection were searched to identify journal articles related to OSCE published up to the present day. CtieSpace V software was used to visually analyze the research institutions, authors, highly cited literature, and keyword changes of the articles based on scientific knowledge maps. The overall number of publications on OSCE published in China and globally showed an increasing trend, but foreign publications were significantly more than Chinese publications. The institutions and authors were widely distributed. Comprehensive universities were the main institutions in foreign publications, with relatively little cooperation between each other. Domestic research primarily focused on medical education in the early stage, SP training and standardization in the middle stage, and clinical competence for resident physicians, nurses, and other clinical professionals in the late stage. Early foreign research focused mainly on medical education and clinical competence, while later research focused primarily on communication with patients and ability assessment. It is expected that future domestic research will focus on building clinical competence evaluation systems based on the OSCE model, while future foreign research will focus on patient communication and humanistic care assessment.

Assessment of life support skills of resident dentists using OSCE: cross-sectional survey.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this cross-sectional survey was to apply the Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) to evaluate the cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and endotracheal intubation skills of resident dentists for stage assessment in standardized training. METHODS: A total of 146 third-year resident dentists were recruited and randomly assigned to perform either CPR or endotracheal intubation. Their performance was scored by experienced anesthesiologists with standardized scoring criteria. Participants were also asked to rated their self-assessed competence, willingness, and perceptions on training status using Likert-type scales in a questionnaire. Student's ttest was applied to compare scores for CPR and endotracheal intubation performed by resident dentists with different characteristics. The results of the questionnaires were analyzed and visualized by the R package 'Likert'. Significance was set at the P < 0.05 level. RESULTS: The mean OSCE score for endotracheal intubation (59.1 ± 12.5) was lower than that of CPR (72.4 ± 8.8). Participants with Master's degrees scored higher than those with Bachelor's degrees and Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) degrees in the assessment of CPR and endotracheal intubation. Low scores of self-assessed competence and willingness were observed, especially for endotracheal intubation. Resident dentists showed poor satisfaction on training volume and frequency of CPR and endotracheal intubation. CONCLUSION: Resident dentists showed poor performance on CPR and endotracheal intubation assessed by the OSCE. Relatively low self-assessed competence and willingness were reported in endotracheal intubation. The medical emergency curriculum for resident dentists should be more consistent and standardized to help resident dentists enhance the proficiency of life support skills.

[Contribution and limits of "OSCE", "long-case" and "global end-of-placement marking" as end-of-rotation assessment methods. Experience from two internal medicine wards]. / Apport et limites des « ECOS ¼, « examen clinique au lit du malade ¼ et « appréciation globale de stage ¼ comme modalité d'évaluation de fin de stage. Expérience de deux services de médecine interne.

INTRODUCTION: During placements, there is an opportunity to learn clinical skills and to assess their application. However, it represents two different goals. The validity of an end-of-placement assessment is questionable, as the medical competency is contextual. We decided to evaluate the contribution and limits of different assessment modalities as an end-of-placement assessment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Internal medicine clerks were assessed using the Mini-Cex grid by a structured objective clinical examination (OSCE), a long-case clinical examination (LCE) and a global end-of-placement marking (GEPM). Following these evaluations, students and teachers fulfilled an open questionnaire. RESULTS: In 2021, 41 students and 16 teachers participated in the study. Physical examination was evaluated in 0%, 97% et 76% of cases during OSCE, LCE and GEPM, respectively; teaching skills were assessed for 100, 42 et 49% of students in OSCE, LCE and GEPM, respectively. As compared to OSCE, there was a perceived superiority of LCE regarding its formative value (P=0.07 and P=0.03) and its summative value (P=0.0007 and P=0.02), for students and teachers, respectively. Qualitative analysis highlights the breadth of clinical skills that could be assessed during OSCE stations. Integration into a team was an additional skill that could specifically be assessed during GEPM. GEPM could also take into account the progress made during placement. CONCLUSION: Despite its subjectivity, LCE seemed to be the preferred modality for an end-of-rotation assessment.

The impact of COVID-19 on medical students' practical skills and hygiene behavior regarding venipuncture: a case control study.

BACKGROUND: Despite their importance to current and future patient care, medical students' hygiene behaviors and acquisition of practical skills have rarely been studied in previous observational study. Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate the potential impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on medical student's hygiene and practical skills. METHODS: This case-control study assessed the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on hygiene behavior by contrasting the practical skills and hygiene adherence of 371 medical students post the pandemic associated lockdown in March 2020 with that of 355 medical students prior to the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak. Students' skills were assessed using an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE). Their skills were then compared based on their results in hygienic venipuncture and the total OSCE score. RESULTS: During the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, medical students demonstrated an increased level of compliance regarding hand hygiene before (prior COVID-19: 83.7%; during COVID-19: 94.9%; p < 0.001) and after patient contact (prior COVID-19: 19.4%; during COVID-19: 57.2%; p = 0.000) as well as disinfecting the puncture site correctly (prior COVID-19: 83.4%; during COVID-19: 92.7%; p < 0.001). Prior to the pandemic, students were more proficient in practical skills, such as initial venipuncture (prior COVID-19: 47.6%; during COVID-19: 38%; p < 0.041), patient communication (prior COVID-19: 85.9%; during COVID-19: 74.1%; p < 0.001) and structuring their work process (prior COVID-19: 74.4%; during COVID-19: 67.4%; p < 0.024). CONCLUSION: Overall, the COVID-19 pandemic sensitized medical students' attention and adherence to hygiene requirements, while simultaneously reducing the amount of practice opportunities, thus negatively affecting their practical skills. The latter development may have to be addressed by providing additional practice opportunities for students as soon as the pandemic situation allows.

The role of the emotive, moral, and cognitive components for the prediction of medical students' empathic behavior in an Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE).

OBJECTIVES: Investigate whether medical students' emotive abilities, attitudes, and cognitive empathic professional abilities predict empathic behavior in an Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE). METHODS: Linear and multiple regressions were used to test concurrent validity between Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI), Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy (JSPE-S), Situational Judgement Test (SJT-expert-based score (SJT-ES), SJT-theory-based score (SJT-TS)) and empathic behavior in an OSCE measured by Berlin Global Rating (BGR) and Verona Coding Definitions for Emotion Sequences (VR-CoDES). RESULTS: Highest amounts of explained variance of empathic behavior measured by VR-CoDES were found for the SJT-ES (R2 = 0.125) and SJT-TS (R2 = 0.131). JSPE-S (R2 = 0.11) and SJT-ES (R2 = 0.10) explained the highest amount of variance in empathic behavior as measured by BGR. Stepwise multiple regression improved the model for BGR by including SJT-ES and JSPE-S, explaining 16.2% of variance. CONCLUSIONS: The instrument measuring the emotive component (IRI) did not significantly predict empathic behavior, whereas instruments measuring moral (JSPE-S) and cognitive components (SJT) significantly predicted empathic behavior. However, the explained variance was small. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: The instrument measuring the emotive component (IRI) did not significantly predict empathic behavior, whereas instruments measuring moral (JSPE-S) and cognitive components (SJT) significantly predicted empathic behavior. However, the explained variance was small. In a longitudinal assessment program, triangulation of different instruments assessing empathy offers a rich perspective of learner's empathic abilities. Empathy training should include the acquisition of knowledge, attitudes, and behavior to support learner's empathic behaviors.