Model-based comparisons of post-treatment free IgE and FEV1 between omalizumab asthma dosing tables in the United States and European Union.

AIMS: Omalizumab is an anti-immunoglobulin E (IgE) monoclonal antibody that was first approved by the United States (US) Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of allergic asthma in 2003. The pivotal trials supporting the initial approval of omalizumab used dosing determined by patient's baseline IgE and body weight, with the goal of reducing the mean free IgE level to approximately 25 ng/mL or less. While the underlying parameters supporting the dosing table remained the same, subsequent studies and analyses have resulted in approved alternative versions of the dosing table, including the European Union (EU) asthma dosing table, which differs in weight bands and maximum allowable baseline IgE and omalizumab dose. In this study, we leveraged modelling and simulation approaches to predict and compare the free IgE reduction and forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) improvement with omalizumab dosing based on the US and EU asthma dosing tables. METHODS: Previously established population pharmacokinetic-IgE and IgE-FEV1 models were used to predict and compare post-treatment free IgE and FEV1 based on the US and EU dosing tables. Clinical trial simulations (with virtual asthma populations) and Monte Carlo simulations were performed to provide both breadth and depth in the comparisons. RESULTS: The US and EU asthma dosing tables were predicted to result in generally comparable free IgE suppression and FEV1 improvement. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the similar free IgE and FEV1 outcomes from simulations, this has not been clinically validated with respect to the registrational endpoint of reduction in annualized asthma exacerbations.

Evaluating the Efficacy of Omalizumab in Severe Cedar Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis in Japan.

BACKGROUND: Traditional treatments for cedar seasonal allergic rhinitis include second-generation antihistamines, nasal corticosteroids, and sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT). Omalizumab (Xolair®), an anti-immunoglobulin E (IgE) monoclonal antibody, is an additional option for severe cases unresponsive to existing therapies. Numerous studies have demonstrated the therapeutic effectiveness of omalizumab for cedar seasonal allergic rhinitis; however, most reported results after only up to four weeks of follow-up. Therefore, this study evaluates the clinical efficacy of omalizumab throughout one whole cedar pollen season.   Subjects and methods: This study included patients from our department and the Otorhinolaryngology Department of Minami Osaka Hospital between 2021 and 2023 who were ≥ 12 years old and had serum total IgE levels of 30-1,500 IU/mL, a baseline weight of 30-150 kg, and persistent severe nasal symptoms despite conventional treatments. Patients taking oral steroids at the time of enrollment or had fewer than two omalizumab doses were excluded. Forty-six patients (26 males, 20 females; mean age, 19.1 ± 11.2 years) met these criteria and received subcutaneous omalizumab every 2 or 4 weeks based on their IgE levels and weight. Symptoms were assessed at baseline and 4, 8, and 12 weeks post-administration using the Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) and the Japanese Standard Quality of Life Questionnaire (JRQLQ No. 1) for allergic rhinitis.   Results: Thirty-six patients were followed up for 8 weeks and 13 for 12 weeks. TNSS significantly improved from 6.6 to 4.5 at 4 weeks, 4.2 at 8 weeks, and 4.1 at 12 weeks (p<0.05). Nasal discharge, sneezing, nasal obstruction, itchy eyes, and tearfulness showed significant improvements (p<0.05). Quality of life scores improved in daily activities, sleep, and physical health from week 4 to week 12.   Discussion: Consistent with previous findings, omalizumab significantly improved nasal and ocular symptoms and quality of life in patients with severe cedar seasonal allergic rhinitis. Despite many patients discontinuing the drug after eight weeks due to high costs, the drug's effectiveness in preventing symptom recurrence suggests potential long-term benefits. Combining omalizumab with SLIT showed no significant differences in outcomes; however, further pharmacoeconomic studies are warranted to evaluate cost-effectiveness.   Conclusion: Omalizumab proved to be an effective treatment for severe cedar seasonal allergic rhinitis, providing significant symptom relief and quality of life improvements. Further studies should investigate its long-term efficacy and safety, including potential adverse effects and the development of anti-omalizumab antibodies.

Race & ethnicity, not just insurance, is associated with biologics initiation in asthma and related conditions.

BACKGROUND: There are pre-existing inequities in asthma care. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate effect modification by race of the effect of insurance on biologic therapy use in patients with asthma and related diseases. METHODS: We conducted inverse probability weighted (IPW) analyses using electronic health records data from 2011-2020 from a large healthcare system in Boston, MA. We evaluated the odds of not initiating omalizumab or mepolizumab therapy within one year of prescription for an approved indication. RESULTS: We identified 1,132 individuals who met study criteria. Twenty-seven percent of these patients had public insurance and 12% belonged to a historically marginalized group (HMG). A quarter of patients did not initiate the prescribed biologic. Among patients with asthma, individuals belonging to HMG had higher exacerbation rates in the period before initiation compared to non-HMG individuals, regardless of insurance type. Among HMG patients with asthma, those with private insurance were less likely to not initiate therapy compared to those with public insurance, (Odds Ratio, (OR) 0.67, and 95% Confidence Interval, [CI] 0.56 - 0.79). Among non-HMG with asthma, privately insured and publicly insured individuals had similar rates of not initiating the prescribed biologic (OR: 1.02; 95% CI: 0.95 -1.09). Among those publicly insured with asthma, HMGs had higher odds of not initiating therapy compared to non-HMGs (OR 1.16; 95% CI 1.03 - 1.31), but privately-insured HMG and non-HMG did not differ significantly (OR: 0.99; 95% CI: 0.91 - 1.07). CONCLUSION: Publicly insured individuals belonging to HMG are less likely to initiate biologics when prescribed despite having more severe asthma, while there are no inequities by insurance in individuals belonging to other groups.

Omalizumab in Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria: A Real-World Study on Effectiveness, Safety and Predictors of Treatment Outcome.

Background: Although omalizumab has shown success in treating chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) patients unresponsive to antihistamines, the exact mechanism of action and predictive markers of response remain unclear. Purpose: The aim of this study was to examine the correlation between baseline levels of biomarkers and clinical parameters with omalizumab response and response rate in patients with CSU. Methods: This retrospective study included 82 adult CSU patients who received omalizumab 300mg every 4 weeks for 16 weeks between January 2022 and December 2023. Treatment response was assessed using UAS7 and DLQI scores at baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16. Responders were defined as patients achieving UAS7 < 7, with early and late responders categorized based on response within or after 4 weeks, respectively. Baseline clinical features and laboratory biomarkers were compared between responders and non-responders. Results: The overall response rate was 71.95% (59/82), with 23 early responders and 36 late responders. Responders had significantly lower baseline UAS7 (median: 28 vs 35, P < 0.01), DLQI (median: 8 vs 15, P < 0.001), and IL-17 levels (median: 0.53 vs 1.26 pg/mL, P < 0.001) compared to non-responders. Baseline UAS7 > 31, DLQI > 9.5, and IL-17 > 0.775 pg/mL predicted non-response with sensitivities of 78.26%, 100%, and 78.26%, and specificities of 67.8%, 59.32%, and 72.88%, respectively. ASST positivity and comorbid allergic diseases were associated with early response (P < 0.05). Adverse events were reported in 6.09% of patients, including mild injection site reactions and transient urticaria exacerbation, not requiring treatment discontinuation. Conclusion: This study suggests that omalizumab is an effective and safe treatment option for antihistamine-refractory CSU. Baseline UAS7, DLQI, ASST status, serum total IgE levels, and IL-17 may serve as potential predictors of omalizumab response. Notably, ASST positivity and comorbid allergic diseases were associated with an early response to treatment. These findings highlight the importance of considering individual patient characteristics when predicting the likelihood and timing of response to omalizumab in CSU.

Efficacy and safety of a proposed omalizumab biosimilar compared to the reference product in the management of uncontrolled moderate-to-severe allergic asthma: a multicenter, phase III, randomized, double-blind, equivalency clinical trial.

Background and aims: Allergic asthma has a considerable burden on the quality of life. A significant portion of moderate-to-severe allergic asthma patients need omalizumab, an anti-immunoglobulin-E monoclonal antibody, as an add-on therapy. In this phase III clinical trial P043 (Zerafil®, CinnaGen, Iran) efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity were compared with Xolair® (the originator omalizumab). The primary outcome was the rate of protocol-defined asthma exacerbations. Methods: Exacerbation rates, Asthma Control Test (ACT) results, spirometry measurements, immunogenicity, and safety were evaluated. Each subject received either medication with a dose ranging from 150 to 375 mg based on pre-treatment serum total IgE level (IU/mL) and body weight (kg) every two or four weeks for a duration of 28 weeks. Results: Exacerbation rates were 0.150 (CI: 0.079-0.220) in the P043 group, and 0.190 (CI: 0.110-0.270) in the omalizumab group (per-protocol). The least squares mean differences of predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in the First second (FEV1) were -2.51% (CI: -7.17-2.15, P=0.29) and -3.87% (CI: -8.79-1.04, P=0.12), pre- and post-bronchodilator use. The mean ± SD of ACT scores at the screening and the last visit were 10.62 ± 2.93 and 20.93 ± 4.26 in P043 and 11.09 ± 2.75 and 20.46 ± 5.11 in the omalizumab group. A total of 288 adverse events were reported for the 256 enrolled participants. Among all, "dyspnea" and "headache" were the most reported ones. The overall incidence of adverse events (P=0.62) and serious adverse events (P=0.07) had no significant differences between the two groups. None of the samples were positive for anti-drug antibodies. Conclusion: P043 was equivalent to omalizumab in the management of asthma in reduction of exacerbations. There was no significant difference in other efficacy and safety parameters. Clinical trial registration: www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05813470) and www.IRCT.ir (IRCT20150303021315N20).

Favorable clinical course after discontinuation of omalizumab treatment in patients with allergic severe asthma: A real-world clinical practice.

The success rate of omalizumab discontinuation is 50-75.5%. However, such data are scarce in Japan. We retrospectively investigated the clinical progression following the cessation of long-term omalizumab treatment (>5 years) in severe allergic asthma patients who have achieved super-responder status, defined as being off any oral maintenance corticosteroids without experiencing exacerbations requiring systemic corticosteroids for >1 year. Six (28.6%) among 21 patients recommenced after a median period of 5.5 (4.3-12.5) months later due to exacerbated asthma control, resulting in improved asthma management for all patients. The rates of patients who successfully remained off omalizumab treatment for 1 and 2 years were 72.4% and 65.8%, respectively. Specific IgE levels after discontinuing omalizumab treatment significantly decreased compared to those at initiating this treatment in 10 patients who successfully remained off this treatment. Therefore, discontinuing omalizumab treatment may be considered for patients continuing treatment beyond 5 years and achieving super-responder status.

Treatment of patients with evidence of mast cell-mediated itch in the absence of hives with omalizumab.

PURPOSE: The presence of wheals or hives has been viewed as a hallmark symptom of urticaria, a highly debilitating disease. This study explores our experience with omalizumab in patients with apparent mast-cell mediated pruritus in the absence of hives. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective case series examining all patients with mast cell-mediated pruritus in the absence of hives from April 2022 to May 2024 at a tertiary referral clinic at Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai in New York. Peak pruritus-numerical rating scale (PP-NRS) itch score changes over time were recorded and analyzed. RESULTS: Six patients (67% women; mean [SD] age, 47.67 [13.52] years) were included in the analysis. The median [IQR] pruritus PP-NRS itch score before omalizumab injection was 9 [6 - 10] and the final median [IQR] PP-NRS itch score was 2.5 [0 - 5]. The mean [SD] reduction in the PP-NRS itch score was 6 [3.16]. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that patients with evidence of mast cell-mediated pruritus can be identified based on clinical features and may benefit from omalizumab therapy.

Time-course and dose-effect of omalizumab in treating chronic idiopathic urticaria/chronic spontaneous urticaria.

PURPOSE: Several studies have shown that subcutaneous injections of omalizumab can treat chronic idiopathic/spontaneous urticaria (CIU/CSU) patients by only assessing the efficacy on specific endpoints. This study aimed to quantitatively analyze different doses of omalizumab in CIU/CSU and compare it with ligelizumab. METHODS: Literature searches were performed in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases. A model-based meta-analysis (MBMA) was utilized to develop a model incorporating time since the initiation of treatment and dose for omalizumab, with the change from baseline in Urticaria Activity Score (CFB-UAS7) as the primary efficacy endpoint. The time-course and dose-effect relationship throughout the omalizumab treatment period was analyzed, and the findings were compared with those of the investigational ligelizumab. RESULTS: The model equation for the CFB-UAS7 was established as E = -Emax × time/(ET50 + time) × (b0 + b1 × dose). The estimated values of the model parameters E max , ET 50 , b 0 , and b 1 were -1.16, 1.26 weeks, -9.90, and -0.0361 mg-1, respectively. At week 12 after the first dose, the model-predicted CFB-UAS7 for 150 mg and 300 mg of omalizumab were -16.0 (95% CI, -17.2 to -14.8) and -21.7 (95% CI, -22.9 to -20.5), respectively. In the PEARL-1 trial, the CFB-UAS7 for 72 mg and 120 mg of ligelizumab were -19.4 (95% CI, -20.7 to -18.1) and -19.3 (95% CI, -20.6 to -18.0), respectively. In the PEARL-2 trial, these values were -19.2 (95% CI, -20.5 to -17.9) and -20.3 (95% CI, -21.6 to -19.0), respectively. CONCLUSION: Omalizumab showed a significant dose-dependent effect in the treatment of CSU. Both 72 mg and 120 mg ligelizumab might have the potential to outperform 150 mg (but not 300 mg) omalizumab.

Acute Motor Conduction Block Neuropathy After Initiation of Omalizumab: Case Report and Literature Review for Possible Causality.

Background: Omalizumab is an established therapy for allergic conditions, yet its neurological effects remain underexplored compared to other biological agents. Case description: A 45-year-old male with asthma developed acute quadriparesis one week after receiving the first dose of omalizumab. Electrophysiological studies have shown partial motor conduction block in multiple nerves, with reduced CMAP amplitudes and absent F-waves in others. CSF showed cyto-albuminous dissociation. The diagnosis was a variant of Guillain-Barré syndrome. Despite intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) therapy, the patient experienced persistent neuropathic symptoms. Discussion: The patient presented with acute quadriparesis devoid of sensory or cranial nerve involvement, suggestive of a variant of Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) known as acute motor conduction block neuropathy (AMCBN). Electrophysiological studies have indicated conduction block without demyelination, implicating axonal degeneration. Despite negative findings for common etiologies, the temporal association between omalizumab administration and symptom onset suggests a potential link, supported by criteria for drug-induced illness. Conflicting evidence exists regarding omalizumab's neurological effects, with proposed mechanisms including autoimmune reactions and mast cell dysfunction. Comparisons to TNF-α antagonists highlight similar neuropathy patterns, indicating a need for further research to clarify omalizumab's neurotoxicity. Conclusion: In conclusion, while omalizumab holds promise for allergic conditions, including chronic urticaria, its potential impact on peripheral nerves necessitates vigilance among clinicians. Further studies are imperative to ascertain the risk-benefit profile and elucidate underlying mechanisms and risk factors of neurological complications associated with omalizumab therapy.

Omalizumab for management of hypersensitivity reactions to anticancer drugs.

Hypersensitivity reactions to anticancer drugs include treatment-limiting toxicity. Standard drug desensitisation offers temporary tolerance and hence requires repetition. We used omalizumab, an anti-immunoglobulin E antibody, to overcome immediate and delayed hypersensitivity reactions to various anticancer drugs. Seven of the eight patients in the current study successfully resumed the desired anticancer drug regimen without standard desensitisation. No safety issues from omalizumab were observed.

The effectiveness of omalizumab therapy in patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria: the experience of a single-centre study in Poland.

Introduction: Omalizumab, which is a recombinant, humanised anti-immunoglobulin-E antibody, is the only approved drug for antihistamine refractory chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU). It has been reported that it is an effective and safe drug, but the data about long-term effectiveness are still lacking. Aim: To perform a retrospective analysis of the patients with CSU treated with omalizumab at the dermatology department to assess effectiveness of omalizumab therapy in the single centre in Poland. Material and methods: A two-and-a-half-year retrospective analysis of patients with CSU undergoing the therapy with omalizumab was conducted. Patients' data were analysed for many factors such as age, gender, severity indexes (UAS7, DLQI), duration and effects of the treatment used. Results: Sixty-one patients with CSU have been treated with omalizumab in the drug program. The number of female patients - 42 (68.9%) significantly dominated over the number of male patients - 19 (31.1%). The mean UAS7 during the first course of treatment declined from 33.2 to 2.8, during the second from 30.9 to 1.7 and during the third 32.7 to 2.5. In case of DLQI the mean scores decrease from 18 to 2.1 in the first cycle, from 16.9 to 1.9 in the second and from 18.6 to 1.1 in the third. Conclusions: Our study confirmed that omalizumab is an effective medicine in a long-term treatment which improves a physical as well as psychological condition of the patients with antihistamine-resistant CSU. To our knowledge, it is the first study in Poland that presents omalizumab effectiveness during three courses of treatment.

Characterization of omalizumab updosing patterns and predictive factors in chronic spontaneous urticaria: A prospective multicentric observational study.

BACKGROUND: Limited information is available on the use of omalizumab (OMA) updosing since its introduction as a second-line therapy in chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) in 2014. Practical guidelines from health authorities are lacking, and the specific characteristics of patients requiring higher doses remain unknown. Our objectives were to characterize the patterns of OMA updosing (defined as changes in dose and/or injection intervals), to identify the predictive factors associated with updosing, and to improve CSU management. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, multicentric, real-life observational study, including patients diagnosed with CSU and starting OMA. The data were collected at 0, 3, 6, and 9 months. The primary endpoint was the frequency of OMA updosing at 3 months. The secondary endpoints included an analysis of updosed patients' profile, and an assessment of OMA efficacy and safety. RESULTS: We included 153 patients. Twenty percent of patients were updosed at 3 months, and 27% in total during the 9-month follow-up. Practitioners mainly chose to increase the frequency of injections (66%). At baseline, the updosed patients were more likely to have more severe CSU (UCT < 4, p < 0.030), a lower lymphocyte count (<2000/mm3, p = 0.037), and low IgE levels (<70 UI/mL, p = 0.024). The side effects of OMA were not more frequent after updosing. CONCLUSION: One in five patient underwent updosing within just 3 months. OMA updosing is frequent in particular in cases of severe disease and low IgE blood levels.

Dupilumab Reduces Urticaria Activity, Itch, and Hives in Patients with Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria Regardless of Baseline Serum Immunoglobulin E Levels.

INTRODUCTION: In chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU), interleukin (IL)-4 and IL-13 may promote mast cell activation directly via IL-4 receptor expression, or indirectly via upregulated immunoglobulin E (IgE) production. Dupilumab significantly improved CSU signs and symptoms in the phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled LIBERTY-CSU CUPID Study A. This analysis explores the impact of dupilumab on CSU signs and symptoms and serum IgE levels in patients from LIBERTY-CSU CUPID Study A with serum total IgE above and below 100 IU/mL at baseline. METHODS: Patients with H1-antihistamine-refractory CSU received dupilumab (n = 70) or placebo (n = 68) for 24 weeks. Efficacy endpoints were change from baseline to weeks 12 and 24 in serum total IgE levels, Itch Severity Score over 7 days (ISS7), Urticaria Activity Score over 7 days (UAS7), and Hives Severity Score over 7 days (HSS7) in dupilumab- or placebo-treated patients with serum total IgE above and below 100 IU/mL at baseline. RESULTS: Dupilumab treatment significantly reduced median (interquartile range) IgE levels at week 12 [dupilumab: -31.9% (-41.9; -22.6); placebo: -6.3% (-21.3; 14.9)] and week 24 [dupilumab: -48.2% (-56.8; - 39.5); placebo: - 6.3% (-34.5; 14.8)]. Similar IgE reductions relative to baseline were observed in dupilumab-treated patients regardless of baseline IgE level. Dupilumab treatment improved ISS7, UAS7, and HSS7 over 12 and 24 weeks, regardless of baseline serum IgE level (interaction p ≥ 0.59 for all treatment by subgroup comparisons), with weak correlations (r < 0.2) observed between IgE level changes and ISS7, UAS7, and HSS7 outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Dupilumab significantly improved CSU signs and symptoms and reduced serum IgE, regardless of baseline IgE levels. In the current analysis, baseline total IgE had no predictive value as a dupilumab treatment response biomarker in CSU. Downregulation of IgE, a key mediator of mast cell activation and histamine release, may at least partially explain the effectiveness of dupilumab in reducing CSU signs and symptoms. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04180488.

Long-term use of omalizumab in patients with allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis: a tertiary-level care center experience.

INTRODUCTION: Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA) is a lung disease caused by a hypersensitivity reaction to antigens of Aspergillus fumigatus. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term clinical outcomes of omalizumab use in patients with ABPA. METHODS: In this retrospective study, 12 patients diagnosed with ABPA and receiving omalizumab for at least 2 years, and 32 patients diagnosed with severe allergic asthma and receiving omalizumab for at least 2 years (control group) were evaluated. RESULTS: Evaluation was made of a total of 44 participants, comprising 11 (25%) males and 33 (75%) females, who received omalizumab for at least 2 years with the diagnosis of the control group (n = 32) and ABPA (n = 12). The increase in asthma control test (ACT) score after omalizumab was significant at 12 months and at 24 months in patients with ABPA. After omalizumab, the use of oral corticosteroid (OCS), the annual number of asthma attacks and hospitalizations were significantly decreased at 12 months and at 24 months in patients with ABPA. The increase in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) (%) and ACT score after omalizumab were significant at 12 months and at 24 months in the control group. After omalizumab, the use of OCS, annual number of asthma attacks and hospitalizations were significantly decreased at 12 months and at 24 months in the control group. CONCLUSION: Long-term omalizumab use in patients with ABPA seems to be an effective treatment for improving pulmonary function and reducing asthma exacerbations and hospitalizations.

Paradoxical Worsening of Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria Following Omalizumab Administration: The Missing Link.

Omalizumab, a humanized anti-IgE monoclonal antibody, is commonly employed in the treatment of antihistamine-refractory chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU), where it significantly reduces free IgE levels, minimizing histamine release from basophils and mast cells. Despite its efficacy, there are concerns regarding its effect on parasitic defense due to IgE's role in combating parasitic infestations. We present a case of a 28-year-old female agriculturist with a six-month history of CSU who experienced a paradoxical exacerbation of her symptoms following an increase in the omalizumab treatment dose. This deterioration coincided with a serologically confirmed parasitic infection with Echinococcus granulosus and Toxocara canis. Despite normal eosinophil counts and IgE levels, which are typically used to identify parasitic infections, the patient's clinical worsening prompted further investigation that led to the identification of the parasitic infection. Treatment with albendazole and omalizumab discontinuation led to the resolution of her CSU, suggesting that the parasitic infection was contributing to the symptom exacerbation. This case highlights the need for careful screening for parasitic infections before initiating omalizumab in antihistamine-refractory CSU patients from endemic regions, or patients who deteriorate clinically on omalizumab, especially when other indicators such as eosinophil count and IgE levels might not suggest infection. It also underscores the importance of considering a tailored approach to managing CSU that balances effective treatment with the potential for adverse effects related to immunomodulation.

Unveiling Treatment Response Predictors in Predominant Subtypes of Chronic Inducible Urticaria.

INTRODUCTION: Chronic inducible urticaria (CIndU) is a subtype of chronic urticaria (CU), which requires specific triggers to occur. Despite their common occurrence, treatment response rates and predictors of treatment responses are largely lacking in the literature. This study evaluates antihistamine (AH) and omalizumab response rates in the most common CIndU subtypes and examines whether certain features can predict treatment responses. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed CU patients with at least one CIndU subtype and performed comparisons between subgroups, in a total of 423 patients (70% CIndU, 30% chronic spontaneous urticaria [CSU] plus CIndU). RESULTS: The treatment response rates in CIndU were 51.6%, 51.5%, and 86.5% with standard-dose second-generation H1-antihistamines (sgAHs), updosed/combined sgAH, and omalizumab, respectively. Overall AH response was higher in CIndU than CSU plus CIndU (78.3% vs. 62%, p = 0.002) and in symptomatic dermographism (SD) and cold urticaria (ColdU) than cholinergic urticaria (ChoU) (83.2% vs. 78.3 vs. 60.9%, p = 0.04). AH-refractory patients had a longer disease duration (45.2 ± 56.7 months vs. 37 ± 51.9 months, p = 0.04), more angioedema, accompanying CSU, mixed CIndU subtypes (37.5% vs. 21.1%, p = 0.003; 45.1% vs. 27.1%, p = 0.002; 8.8% vs. 2.4%, p = 0.014), and lower baseline urticaria control test scores (5.86 ± 3.3 vs. 8.6 ± 3.6, p < 0.001) than AH-responsive patients. CONCLUSION: CIndU exhibits a good response to both AHs and omalizumab. Notably, the response to AHs is more pronounced in SD and ColdU compared to ChoU. Disease duration, angioedema, accompanying CSU, mixed CIndU, and lower baseline UCT scores may be used to predict AH treatment outcome in CIndU.