ABSTRACT
In the management of osteoporosis, anti-resorptive agents serve as a primary therapeutic approach. However, in cases where individuals exhibit an increased susceptibility to fractures, such as those characterized by severe low bone mass or a history of vertebral or hip fractures that markedly diminish life expectancy, the immediate reduction of fracture risk through the administration of osteoanabolic agents could be beneficial. Teriparatide, available in daily, once-weekly, or twice-weekly dosages, along with abaloparatide and romosozumab, constitutes a trio of such agents. Each of these medications is defined by unique characteristics, distinct efficacy profiles, and specific adverse effects. There is growing evidence to suggest that these agents have a superior effect on enhancing bone mineral density and reducing fracture incidence when compared to traditional bisphosphonate therapies. Nonetheless, their employment demands thorough consideration of clinical indications, which includes evaluating economic factors, the frequency of injections required, and the potential for adverse effects. The objective of this review is to consolidate the current evidence focusing primarily on the efficacy of these agents, with the goal of enhancing understanding and aiding in making more informed treatment decisions, particularly for those individuals who are at an elevated risk of fractures.
ABSTRACT
With the aid of a new fracture risk model, the great treatment gap for osteoporosis should be closed. All patients older than 70 years should undergo a diagnostic procedure for osteoporosis. An additional risk threshold (≥â¯10% per 3 years for femoral and vertebral fractures) should enable patients with a high risk of fracture to be treated with osteoanabolic agents. The use of osteoanabolic agents makes it necessary to administer antiresorptive drugs afterwards. Due to the low event rate of osteonecrosis of the jaw, the initiation of a specific osteoporosis treatment should not be delayed by prophylactic dental treatment. The adherence to the drug treatment should be improved by an individualized approach on the basis of a cooperation between patients, caregivers, and physicians. A regular assessment of falls, including the timed up and go test should be carried out in patients older than 70 years.
Subject(s)
Bone Density Conservation Agents , Osteoporosis , Osteoporotic Fractures , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Humans , Osteoporosis/diagnosis , Osteoporosis/prevention & control , Osteoporosis/drug therapy , Bone Density Conservation Agents/therapeutic use , Bone Density Conservation Agents/adverse effects , Osteoporotic Fractures/prevention & control , Osteoporotic Fractures/diagnosis , Aged , Female , MaleABSTRACT
Introduction: Domino osteoporotic vertebral fracture (OVF) is as a subsequent fracture that develops within 3 months before the initial OVF heals. There is limited evidence regarding the efficacy of osteoanabolic agents on its treatment. This study evaluated the effects of bisphosphonates and anabolic agents teriparatide and romosozumab on subsequent domino OVF. Methods: This was post hoc analysis of a prospective, multicenter, observational study conducted across 8 hospitals, enrolling 144 patients with conservatively treated OVF, grouped into patients receiving bisphosphonate (BP, n = 55), teriparatide (TPTD, n = 62), and romosozumab (Romo, n = 27). The primary outcome was the incidence of subsequent OVF at 3 and 12 months, whereas the secondary outcomes included the incidence of pseudoarthrosis and progression of vertebral collapse (VC). Pseudoarthrosis was classified as stable or unstable based on vertebral instability. Results: The use of osteoanabolic agents did not reduce the incidence of subsequent OVF at 3 and 12 months. There were no significant differences in the background data or type of conservative treatment among the three groups. However, the TPTD and Romo groups had significantly lower rates of unstable pseudarthrosis (p = 0.03). Additionally, there were no significant differences in VC progression between groups, but it tended to be higher in the BP group than the TPTD and Romo group (p = 0.07). Conclusion: Osteoanabolic agents were beneficial in reducing unstable pseudoarthrosis, but were not more effective than bisphosphonates in the development of subsequent domino OVF. A more comprehensive approach to the treatment of osteoporosis is needed to prevent domino OVFs.
ABSTRACT
With the aid of a new fracture risk model, the great treatment gap for osteoporosis should be closed. All patients older than 70 years should undergo a diagnostic procedure for osteoporosis. An additional risk threshold (≥â¯10% per 3 years for femoral and vertebral fractures) should enable patients with a high risk of fracture to be treated with osteoanabolic agents. The use of osteoanabolic agents makes it necessary to administer antiresorptive drugs afterwards. Due to the low event rate of osteonecrosis of the jaw, the initiation of a specific osteoporosis treatment should not be delayed by prophylactic dental treatment. The adherence to the drug treatment should be improved by an individualized approach on the basis of a cooperation between patients, caregivers, and physicians. A regular assessment of falls, including the timed up and go test should be carried out in patients older than 70 years.