Explainable artificial intelligence-driven prostate cancer screening using exosomal multi-marker based dual-gate FET biosensor.

Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) score, a reporting system of prostate MRI cases, has become a standard prostate cancer (PCa) screening method due to exceptional diagnosis performance. However, PI-RADS 3 lesions are an unmet medical need because PI-RADS provides diagnosis accuracy of only 30-40% at most, accompanied by a high false-positive rate. Here, we propose an explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) based PCa screening system integrating a highly sensitive dual-gate field-effect transistor (DGFET) based multi-marker biosensor for ambiguous lesions identification. This system produces interpretable results by analyzing sensing patterns of three urinary exosomal biomarkers, providing a possibility of an evidence-based prediction from clinicians. In our results, XAI-based PCa screening system showed a high accuracy with an AUC of 0.93 using 102 blinded samples with the non-invasive method. Remarkably, the PCa diagnosis accuracy of patients with PI-RADS 3 was more than twice that of conventional PI-RADS scoring. Our system also provided a reasonable explanation of its decision that TMEM256 biomarker is the leading factor for screening those with PI-RADS 3. Our study implies that XAI can facilitate informed decisions, guided by insights into the significance of visualized multi-biomarkers and clinical factors. The XAI-based sensor system can assist healthcare professionals in providing practical and evidence-based PCa diagnoses.

The Role of Radiomics in the Prediction of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in the PI-RADS v2 and v2.1 Era: A Systematic Review.

Early detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) has substantially improved with the latest PI-RADS versions. However, there is still an overdiagnosis of indolent lesions (iPCa), and radiomics has emerged as a potential solution. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the role of handcrafted and deep radiomics in differentiating lesions with csPCa from those with iPCa and benign lesions on prostate MRI assessed with PI-RADS v2 and/or 2.1. The literature search was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases to select relevant studies. Quality assessment was carried out with Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2), Radiomic Quality Score (RQS), and Checklist for Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging (CLAIM) tools. A total of 14 studies were deemed as relevant from 411 publications. The results highlighted a good performance of handcrafted and deep radiomics methods for csPCa detection, but without significant differences compared to radiologists (PI-RADS) in the few studies in which it was assessed. Moreover, heterogeneity and restrictions were found in the studies and quality analysis, which might induce bias. Future studies should tackle these problems to encourage clinical applicability. Prospective studies and comparison with radiologists (PI-RADS) are needed to better understand its potential.

MRI-based PI-RADS score predicts ISUP upgrading and adverse pathology at radical prostatectomy in men with biopsy ISUP 1 prostate cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Most men diagnosed with very-low and low-risk prostate cancer are candidates for active surveillance; however, there is still a misclassification risk. We examined whether PI-RADS category 4 or 5 combined with ISUP 1 on prostate biopsy predicts upgrading and/or adverse pathology at radical prostatectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 127 patients had ISUP 1 cancer on biopsy after multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) and then underwent radical prostatectomy. We then evaluated them for ISUP upgrading and/or adverse pathology on radical prostatectomy. RESULTS: Eight-nine patients (70%) were diagnosed with PI-RADS 4 or 5 lesions. ISUP upgrading was significantly higher among patients with PI-RADS 4-5 lesions (84%) compared to patients with equivocal or non-suspicious mpMRI findings (26%, p < 0.001). Both PI-RADS 4-5 lesions (OR 24.3, 95% CI 7.3, 80.5, p < 0.001) and stage T2 on DRE (OR 5.9, 95% CI 1.2, 29.4, p = 0.03) were independent predictors of upgrading on multivariate logistic regression analysis. Men with PI-RADS 4-5 lesions also had significantly more extra-prostatic extension (51% vs. 3%, p < 0.001) and positive surgical margins (16% vs. 3%. p = 0.03). The only independent predictor of adverse pathology was PI-RADS 4-5 (OR 21.7, 95% CI 4.8, 99, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: PI-RADS 4 or 5 lesions on mpMRI were strong independent predictors of upgrading and adverse pathology. Incorporating mpMRI findings when selecting patients for active surveillance must be further evaluated in future studies.

Urine biomarkers can predict prostate cancer and PI-RADS score prior to biopsy.

Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) based screening of prostate cancer (PCa) needs refinement. The aim of this study was the identification of urinary biomarkers to predict the Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) score and the presence of PCa prior to prostate biopsy. Urine samples from patients with elevated PSA were collected prior to prostate biopsy (cohort = 99). The re-analysis of mass spectrometry data from 45 samples was performed to identify urinary biomarkers to predict the PI-RADS score and the presence of PCa. The most promising candidates, i.e. SPARC-like protein 1 (SPARCL1), Lymphatic vessel endothelial hyaluronan receptor 1 (LYVE1), Alpha-1-microglobulin/bikunin precursor (AMBP), keratin 13 (KRT13), cluster of differentiation 99 (CD99) and hornerin (HRNR), were quantified by ELISA and validated in an independent cohort of 54 samples. Various biomarker combinations showed the ability to predict the PI-RADS score (AUC = 0.79). In combination with the PI-RADS score, the biomarkers improve the detection of prostate carcinoma-free men (AUC = 0.89) and of those with clinically significant PCa (AUC = 0.93). We have uncovered the potential of urinary biomarkers for a test that allows a more stringent prioritization of mpMRI use and improves the decision criteria for prostate biopsy, minimizing patient burden by decreasing the number of unnecessary prostate biopsies.

Value of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI for Grade Group Prediction in Prostate Cancer: A Radiomics Pilot Study.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To determine the role of dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI-radiomics in predicting the International Society of Urological Pathology Grade Group (ISUP-GG) in therapy-naïve prostate cancer (PCa) patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this ethics review board-approved retrospective study on two prospective clinical trials between 2017 and 2020, 73 men with suspected/confirmed PCa were included. All participants underwent multiparametric MRI. On MRI, dominant lesions (per PI-RADS) were identified. DCE-MRI radiomic features were extracted from the segmented volumes following the image biomarker standardisation initiative (IBSI) guidelines through 14 time points. Histopathology evaluation on the cognitive-fusion targeted biopsies was set as the reference standard. Univariate regression was done to evaluate potential predictors across all calculated features. Random forest imputation was used for multivariate modelling. RESULTS: 73 index lesions were reviewed. Histopathology revealed 28, 16, 13 and 16 lesions with ISUP-GG-Negative/1/2, ISUP-GG-3, ISUP-GG-4 and ISUP-GG-5, respectively. From the extracted features, total lesion enhancement (TLE), minimum enhancement intensity and Grey-Level Run Length Matrix (GLRLM) were the most significantly different parameters among ISUP-GGs (Neg/1/2 vs 3/4 vs 5). 16 features with significant cross-sectional associations with ISUP-GGs entered the multivariate analysis. The final DCE partitioning model used only four features (lesion sphericity, TLE, GLRLM and Grey-Level Zone Length Matrix). For the binarized diagnosis (ISUP-GG≤2 vs ISUP-GG>2), the accuracy reached 81%. CONCLUSION: DCE-MRI radiomics might be used as a non-invasive tool for aiding pathological grade group prediction in therapy-naïve PCa patients, potentially adding complementary information to PI-RADS for supporting tailored diagnostic pathways and treatment planning.

Precision in prostate cancer detection: integrating prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD) and the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) to provide additional risk stratification for a more accurate diagnostic decision.

PURPOSE: This study focuses on integrating prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD) and Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) for enhanced risk stratification in biopsy-naïve patients. METHODS: A prospective study was conducted on 339 patients with suspected prostate cancer, utilizing PSAD and PI-RADS in combination. Logistic regression models were employed, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis performed to evaluate predictive performance. The patient cohort underwent multiparametric MRI, targeted biopsy, and systematic biopsy. RESULTS: When patients were stratified into four PSAD risk groups, the rate of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) increased significantly with higher PSAD levels. Logistic regression confirmed the independent contribution of PI-RADS and PSAD, highlighting their role in the prediction of csPCa. Combined models showed superior performance, as evidenced by the area under the curve (AUC) for PI-RADS category and PSAD (0.756), which exceeded that of the individual predictors (PSA AUC, 0.627, PI-RADS AUC 0.689, PSAD AUC 0.708). CONCLUSION: This study concludes that combining PSAD and PI-RADS improves diagnostic accuracy and predictive value for csPCa in biopsy-naïve men, resulting in a promising strategy to provide additional risk stratification for more accurate diagnostic decision in biopsy-naïve patients, especially in the PI-RADS 3 group.

Prior Negative Biopsy, PSA Density, and Anatomic Location Impact Cancer Detection Rate of MRI-Targeted PI-RADS Index Lesions.

BACKGROUND: MRI fusion prostate biopsy has improved the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (CSC). Continued refinements in predicting the pre-biopsy probability of CSC are essential for optimal patient counseling. We investigated potential factors related to improved cancer detection rates (CDR) of CSC in patients with PI-RADS ≥ 3 lesions. METHODS: The pathology of 980 index lesions in 980 patients sampled by transrectal mpMRI-targeted prostate biopsy across four medical centers between 2017-2020 was reviewed. PI-RADS lesion distribution included 291 PI-RADS-5, 374 PI-RADS-4, and 315 PI-RADS-3. We compared CDR of index PI-RADS ≥ 3 lesions based on location (TZ) vs. (PZ), PSA density (PSAD), and history of prior negative conventional transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy (TRUS). RESULTS: Mean age, PSA, prostate volume, and level of prior negative TRUS biopsy were 66 years (43-90), 7.82 ng/dL (5.6-11.2), 54 cm3 (12-173), and 456/980 (46.5%), respectively. Higher PSAD, no prior history of negative TRUS biopsy, and PZ lesions were associated with higher CDR. Stratified CDR highlighted significant variance across subgroups. CDR for a PI-RADS-5 score, PZ lesion with PSAD ≥ 0.15, and prior negative biopsy was 77%. Conversely, the CDR rate for a PI-RADS-4 score, TZ lesion with PSAD < 0.15, and prior negative biopsy was significantly lower at 14%. CONCLUSIONS: For index PI-RADS ≥ 3 lesions, CDR varied significantly based on location, prior history of negative TRUS biopsy, and PSAD. Such considerations are critical when counseling on the merits and potential yield of prostate needle biopsy.

Limited Utility of Dynamic Contrast Enhancement Imaging Sequences Within the PI-RADS v2.1 Classification Scheme: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study of MRI Reports.

Background/Objective: We sought to characterize the proportion of peripheral zone lesions "upgraded" within the PI-RADS v2.1 protocol using DCE imaging sequences in a large patient population undergoing multiparametric prostate MRI. Methods: A retrospective review of radiologist reports for 2742 prostate MRI exams at 2 large Alberta teaching hospitals between January 2017 and January 2022 was conducted. Prostate specific antigen (PSA), prostate volume, sequence specific and overall PI-RADS scores, and lesion positivity for DCE were collected if present in the accompanying radiology report. Further, pathology reports of biopsies of the upgraded lesions within upgraded patients were reviewed to see if upgraded lesions were deemed clinically significant by gleason score/grade group. Results: The median age was 63 years, with a median PSA and PSA density of 7.5 ng/mL and 0.13 ng/mL2 respectively. A total of 1809 lesions were reported, with 69.4% of all lesions being DCE positive. Of the lesions within the peripheral zone, 548 were overall PI-RADS 4. A total of 87/2742 (3.2%) of patients were upgraded to a PI-RADS 4 by DCE imaging. Within these patients, 65 had pathology reports available, of which 18 had a clinically significant lesion at the upgrade site. Conclusion: Contrast enhancement is only beneficial for a very small portion of patients undergoing prostate MRI. Given the invasive nature of contrast enhanced studies, potential contrast induced side effects, added imaging time, and the cost of contrast agent, routine use of contrast for prostate MRI is questioned. Further studies are necessary to determine if it should be part of routine prostate MRI imaging protocols.

Development and validation of a novel nomogram to avoid unnecessary biopsy in patients with PI-RADS category ≥ 4 lesions and PSA ≤ 20 ng/ml.

OBJECTIVES: To develop and validate a prediction model for identifying non-prostate cancer (non-PCa) in biopsy-naive patients with PI-RADS category ≥ 4 lesions and PSA ≤ 20 ng/ml to avoid unnecessary biopsy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients who underwent transperineal biopsies at West China Hospital between 2018 and 2022 were included. The patients were randomly divided into training cohort (70%) and validation cohort (30%). Logistic regression was used to screen for independent predictors of non-PCa, and a nomogram was constructed based on the regression coefficients. The discrimination and calibration were assessed by the C-index and calibration plots, respectively. Decision curve analysis (DCA) and clinical impact curves (CIC) were applied to measure the clinical net benefit. RESULTS: A total of 1580 patients were included, with 634 non-PCa. Age, prostate volume, prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD), apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and lesion zone were independent predictors incorporated into the optimal prediction model, and a corresponding nomogram was constructed ( https://nomogramscu.shinyapps.io/PI-RADS-4-5/ ). The model achieved a C-index of 0.931 (95% CI, 0.910-0.953) in the validation cohort. The DCA and CIC demonstrated an increased net benefit over a wide range of threshold probabilities. At biopsy-free thresholds of 60%, 70%, and 80%, the nomogram was able to avoid 74.0%, 65.8%, and 55.6% of unnecessary biopsies against 9.0%, 5.0%, and 3.6% of missed PCa (or 35.9%, 30.2% and 25.1% of foregone biopsies, respectively). CONCLUSION: The developed nomogram has favorable predictive capability and clinical utility can help identify non-PCa to support clinical decision-making and reduce unnecessary prostate biopsies.

Case-by-case combination of the prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2.1 with the Likert score to reduce the false-positives of prostate MRI: a proof-of-concept study.

OBJECTIVES: To retrospectively investigate whether a case-by-case combination of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2.1 (PI-RADS) with the Likert score improves the diagnostic performance of mpMRI for clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa), especially by reducing false-positives. METHODS: One hundred men received mpMRI between January 2020 and April 2021, followed by prostate biopsy. Reader 1 (R1) and reader 2 (R2) (experience of > 3000 and < 200 mpMRI readings) independently reviewed mpMRIs with the PI-RADS version 2.1. After unveiling clinical information, they were free to add (or not) a Likert score to upgrade or downgrade or reinforce the level of suspicion of the PI-RADS category attributed to the index lesion or, rather, identify a new index lesion. We calculated sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of R1/R2 in detecting csPCa when biopsying PI-RADS ≥ 3 index-lesions (strategy 1) versus PI-RADS ≥ 3 or Likert ≥ 3 index-lesions (strategy 2), with decision curve analysis to assess the net benefit. In strategy 2, the Likert score was considered dominant in determining biopsy decisions. RESULTS: csPCa prevalence was 38%. R1/R2 used combined PI-RADS and Likert categorization in 28%/18% of examinations relying mainly on clinical features such as prostate specific antigen level and digital rectal examination than imaging findings. The specificity/positive predictive values were 66.1/63.1% for R1 (95%CI 52.9-77.6/54.5-70.9) and 50.0/51.6% (95%CI 37.0-63.0/35.5-72.4%) for R2 in the case of PI-RADS-based readings, and 74.2/69.2% for R1 (95%CI 61.5-84.5/59.4-77.5%) and 56.6/54.2% (95%CI 43.3-69.0/37.1-76.6%) for R2 in the case of combined PI-RADS/Likert readings. Sensitivity/negative predictive values were unaffected. Strategy 2 achieved greater net benefit as a trigger of biopsy for R1 only. CONCLUSION: Case-by-case combination of the PI-RADS version 2.1 with Likert score translated into a mild but measurable impact in reducing the false-positives of PI-RADS categorization, though greater net benefit in reducing unnecessary biopsies was found in the experienced reader only.

Integration of PSAd and multiparametric MRI to forecast biopsy outcomes in biopsy-naïve patients with PSA 4~20 ng/ml.

Introduction: This study aims to investigate whether the transrectal ultrasound-guided combined biopsy (CB) improves the detection rates of prostate cancer (PCa) and clinically significant PCa (csPCa) in biopsy-naïve patients. We also aimed to compare the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS v2.1) score, ADC values, and PSA density (PSAd) in predicting csPCa by the combined prostate biopsy. Methods: This retrospective and single-center study included 389 biopsy-naïve patients with PSA level 4~20 ng/ml, of whom 197 underwent prebiopsy mpMRI of the prostate. The mpMRI-based scores (PI-RADS v2.1 scores and ADC values) and clinical parameters were collected and evaluated by logistic regression analyses. Multivariable models based on the mpMRI-based scores and clinical parameters were developed by the logistic regression analyses to forecast biopsy outcomes of CB in biopsy-naïve patients. The ROC curves measured by the AUC values, calibration plots, and DCA were performed to assess multivariable models. Results: The CB can detect more csPCa compared with TRUSB (32.0% vs. 53%). The Spearman correlation revealed that Gleason scores of the prostate biopsy significantly correlated with PI-RADS scores and ADC values. The multivariate logistic regression confirmed that PI-RADS scores 4, 5, and prostate volume were important predictors of csPCa. The PI-RADS+ADC+PSAd (PAP) model had the highest AUCs of 0.913 for predicting csPCa in biopsy-naïve patients with PSA level 4~20 ng/ml. When the biopsy risk threshold of the PAP model was greater than or equal to 0.10, 51% of patients could avoid an unnecessary biopsy, and only 5% of patients with csPCa were missed. Conclusion: The prebiopsy mpMRI and the combined prostate biopsy have a high CDR of csPCa in biopsy-naïve patients. A multivariable model based on the mpMRI-based scores and PSAd could provide a reference for clinicians in forecasting biopsy outcomes in biopsy-naïve patients with PSA 4~20 ng/ml and make a more comprehensive assessment during the decision-making of the prostate biopsy.

Optimizing Prostate Imaging Practices in Saudi Arabian Hospitals: A Comprehensive Analysis of PI-RADS Compliance in Multiparametric MRI.

BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer, a significant contributor to male cancer mortality globally, demands improved diagnostic strategies. In Saudi Arabia, where the incidence is expected to double, this study assessed the compliance of multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) practices with Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System version 2 (PI-RADS v2) guidelines across diverse healthcare institutions. METHODS: A survey was distributed to the radiology departments of all tertiary referral hospitals in Saudi Arabia (n=60) to assess their compliance with the technical specifications outlined in PI-RADS v2. Statistical analysis included chi-square, Fisher exact, ANOVA, and Student t-tests to examine the collected data. RESULTS: The study revealed an overall commendable compliance rate of 95.23%. However, significant variations were observed in technical parameters, particularly between 1.5 Tesla and 3 Tesla scanners and tertiary versus non-tertiary hospitals. Notable adherence in certain sequences contrasted with discrepancies in T2-weighted and diffusion-weighted imaging parameters. CONCLUSION: These findings underscore the need for nuanced approaches to optimize prostate imaging protocols, considering field strength and institutional differences. The study contributes to the ongoing refinement of standardized mpMRI practices, aiming to enhance diagnostic accuracy and improve clinical outcomes in prostate cancer.

A Feasibility Study of AI-Assisted Compressed Sensing in Prostate T2-Weighted Imaging.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the image quality and PI-RADS scoring performance of prostate T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) based on AI-assisted compressed sensing (ACS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective study, adult male urological outpatients or inpatients underwent prostate MRI, including T2WI, diffusion-weighted imaging and apparent diffusion coefficient maps. Three accelerated scanning protocols using parallel imaging (PI) and ACS: T2WIPI, T2WIACS1 and T2WIACS2 were evaluated through comparative analysis. Quantitative analysis included signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), slope profile, and edge rise distance (ERD). Image quality was qualitatively assessed using a five-point Likert scale (ranging from 1 = non-diagnostic to 5 = excellent). PI-RADS scores were determined for the largest or most suspicious lesions in each patient. The Friedman test and one-way ANOVA with post hoc tests were utilized for group comparisons, with statistical significance set at P < 0.05. RESULTS: This study included 40 participants. Compared to PI, ACS reduced acquisition time by over 50%, significantly enhancing the CNR of sagittal and axial T2WI (P < 0.05), significantly improving the image quality of sagittal and axial T2WI (P < 0.05). No significant differences were observed in slope profile, ERD, and PI-RADS scores between groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: ACS reduced prostate T2WI acquisition time by half while improving image quality without affecting PI-RADS scores.

Enhancing prostate cancer diagnosis and reducing unnecessary biopsies with [18F]DCFPyL PET/CT imaging in PI-RADS 3/4 patients.

For patients presenting with prostate imaging reporting and data system (PI-RADS) 3/4 findings on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations, the standard recommendation typically involves undergoing a biopsy for pathological assessment to ascertain the nature of the lesion. This course of action, though essential for accurate diagnosis, invariably amplifies the psychological distress experienced by patients and introduces a host of potential complications associated with the biopsy procedure. However, [18F]DCFPyL PET/CT imaging emerges as a promising alternative, demonstrating considerable diagnostic efficacy in discerning benign prostate lesions from malignant ones. This study aims to explore the diagnostic value of [18F]DCFPyL PET/CT imaging for prostate cancer in patients with PI-RADS 3/4 lesions, assisting in clinical decision-making to avoid unnecessary biopsies. 30 patients diagnosed with PI-RADS 3/4 lesions through mpMRI underwent [18F]DCFPyL PET/CT imaging, with final biopsy pathology results as the "reference standard". Diagnostic performance was assessed through receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, evaluating the diagnostic efficacy of molecular imaging PSMA (miPSMA) visual analysis and semi-quantitative analysis in [18F]DCFPyL PET/CT imaging. Lesions were assigned miPSMA scores according to the prostate cancer molecular imaging standardized evaluation criteria. Among the 30 patients, 13 were pathologically confirmed to have prostate cancer. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of visual analysis in [18F]DCFPyL PET/CT imaging for diagnosing PI-RADS 3/4 lesions were 61.5%, 88.2%, 80.0%, 75.0%, and 76.5%, respectively. Using SUVmax 4.17 as the optimal threshold, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy for diagnosis were 92.3%, 88.2%, 85.7%, 93.8%, and 90.0%, respectively. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) for semi-quantitative analysis was 0.94, significantly higher than visual analysis at 0.80. [18F]DCFPyL PET/CT imaging accurately diagnosed benign lesions in 15 (50%) of the PI-RADS 3/4 patients. For patients with PI-RADS 4 lesions, the positive predictive value of [18F]DCFPyL PET/CT imaging reached 100%. [18F]DCFPyL PET/CT imaging provides potential preoperative prediction of lesion nature in mpMRI PI-RADS 3/4 patients, which may aid in treatment decision-making and reducing unnecessary biopsies.

Multiparametric Prostate MRI Accuracy of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (v2.1) Scores 4 and 5: The Influence of Image Quality According to the Prostate Imaging Quality Score.

Purpose: The accuracy of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) heavily relies on image quality, as evidenced by the evolution of the prostate imaging quality (PI-QUAL) scoring system for the evaluation of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPC). This study aims to evaluate the impact of PI-QUAL scores in detecting csPC within PI-RADS 4 and 5 lesions. Methods: We retrospectively selected from our database all mpMRI performed from January 2019 to March 2022. Inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) mpMRI acquired in our institution according to the technical requirements from the PI-RADS (v2.1) guidelines; (2) single lesion scored as PI-RADS (v2.1) 4 or 5; (3) MRI-TBx performed in our institution; (4) complete histology report; and (5) complete clinical record. Results: A total of 257 male patients, mean age 70.42 ± 7.6 years, with a single PI-RADS 4 or 5 lesion undergoing MRI-targeted biopsy, were retrospectively studied. Of these, 61.5% were PI-RADS 4, and 38.5% were PI-RADS 5, with 84% confirming neoplastic cells. In high-quality image lesions (PI-QUAL ≥ 4), all PI-RADS 5 lesions were accurately identified as positive at the final histological examination (100% of CDR). For PI-RADS 4 lesions, 37 (23%) were negative, resulting in a cancer detection rate of 77% (95% CI: 67.51-84.83). Conclusions: The accuracy of mpMRI, independently of the PI-RADS score, progressively decreased according to the decreasing PI-QUAL score. These findings emphasize the crucial role of the PI-QUAL scoring system in evaluating PI-RADS 4 and 5 lesions, influencing mpMRI accuracy.

Clinical-imaging metrics for the diagnosis of prostate cancer in PI-RADS 3 lesions.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the feasibility and efficacy of clinical-imaging metrics in the diagnosis of prostate cancer (PCa) and clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) in prostate imaging-reporting and data system (PI-RADS) category 3 lesions. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on lesions diagnosed as PI-RADS 3. They were categorized into benign, non-csPCa and csPCa groups. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), T2-weighted imaging signal intensity (T2WISI), coefficient of variation of ADC and T2WISI, prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD), ADC density (ADCD), prostate-specific antigen lesion volume density (PSAVD) and ADC lesion volume density (ADCVD) were measured and calculated. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify risk factors associated with PCa and csPCa. Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) and decision curves were utilized to assess the efficacy and net benefit of independent risk factors. RESULTS: Among 202 patients, 133 had benign prostate disease, 25 non-csPCa and 44 csPCa. Age, PSA and lesion location showed no significant differences (P > 0.05) among the groups. T2WISI and coefficient of variation of ADC (ADCcv) were independent risk factors for PCa in PI-RADS 3 lesions, yielding an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.68. ADC was an independent risk factor for csPCa in PI-RADS 3 lesions, yielding an AUC of 0.65. Decision curve analysis showed net benefit for patients at certain probability thresholds. CONCLUSIONS: T2WISI and ADCcv, along with ADC, respectively showed considerable promise in enhancing the diagnosis of PCa and csPCa in PI-RADS 3 lesions.

Molecular and diffusion features for identification of clinically significant prostate cancer in PI-RADS 3 lesions.

BACKGROUND: The recommendation to perform biopsy of PIRADS 3 lesions has not been adopted with strength as compared to higher scored lesions on multiparametric MRI. This represents a challenging scenario and an unmet need for clinicians to apply a risk adapted approach in these cases. In the present study, we examined clinical and radiologic characteristics in men with PI-RADS 3 index lesions that can predict csPCa on mpMRI-target biopsy. METHODS: Revision of a prospective database with patients who underwent targeted and systematic biopsies from 2015 to 2023 for PI-RADS 3 lesions identified on mpMRI. Baseline variables were collected, such as PSA density (PSAd), 4Kscore, prostate size, and the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value of the lesion on mpMRI. Logistic regression, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and decision curve analyses (DCA) assessing the association between clinic-radiologic factors and csPCa were performed. RESULTS: Overall, 230 patients were included in the study and the median age was 65 years. The median prostate size and PSA were 50 g and 6.26 ng/mL, respectively. 17.4% of patients had csPCa, while 27.5% had Gleason group 1. In univariable logistic analyses, we found that age, BMI, prostate size, PSAd, ADC, and 4Kscore were significant csPCa predictors (P < 0.05). PSAd showed the best prediction performance in terms of AUC (= 0.679). On multivariable analysis, PSAd and 4Kscore were associated with csPCa. The net benefit of PSAd combined with clinical features was superior to those of other parameters. Within patients with PSAd < 0.15, 4Kscore was a statistically significant predictor of csPCa (OR = 3.25, P = 0.032). CONCLUSION: PSAd and 4Kscore are better predictors of csPCa in patients with PIRADS 3 lesions compared to ADC. The predictive role of 4Kscore is higher in patients with low PSAd. These results can assist practitioners in the risk stratification of patients with equivocal lesions to determine the need of biopsy.

Effect of Bacillus Calmette-Guerin Exposure on Prostate Cancer Detection Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Granulomatous prostatitis is a medical condition that may mimic prostate cancer. PURPOSE: Granulomatous prostatitis resulting from BCG-exposure can confound the diagnosis of prostate cancer based on prostate imaging and data system (PI-RADS) classification observed on multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI). STUDY TYPE, POPULATION, ASSESSMENT AND STATISTICAL TESTS: A cohort study was conducted, enrolling consecutive males at risk for prostate cancer who underwent an mpMRI-targeted prostate biopsy between February 2016 and August 2023. The focus of the study was on prior BCG-exposure as adjuvant treatment for non-muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma within the 3 years prior the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Exclusion criteria were a prior androgen deprivation therapy, prostate surgery or radiation, and BCG-exposure occurring more than 3 years and less than 3 months before the MRI. Chi-square, logistic-regression, statistical association, and homogeneity tests were used. RESULTS: Total 712 patients, 899 biopsied lesions (218 PI-RADS 3, 521 PI-RADS 4 and 160 PI-RADS 5) and 20 patients with 30 lesions within the BCG-exposed cohort. Chi-square and logistic-regression tests showed an association between PI-RADS with malignancy and significant tumor (ST), considering PI-RADS3 as the reference (OR: 4.9 [95% CI, 3.4-7.1] for PI-RADS4 and OR: 21.7 [95% CI, 12.4-37.8] for PI-RADS5 for malignancy, and OR: 5.3 [95% CI, 3.2-8.7] for PI-RADS4 and OR: 16.5 [95% CI, 9.4-28.9] for PI-RADS5 regarding ST). A statistically significant negative association was demonstrated between malignancy and ST with respect to BCG-exposure (OR: 0.15 [95% CI, 0.06-0.39] and OR: 0.39 [95% CI, 0.15-1.0], respectively). Statistically significant risk-difference for malignancy in patients nonexposed to BCG regarding those exposed was 45% (61.6% vs. 16.7%) for PI-RADS4, and 68.5% (90.7% vs. 22.2%) and 42.7% (64.9% vs. 22.2%) concerning malignancy and ST for PI-RADS5, respectively. DATA CONCLUSIONS: Granulomatous prostate reaction caused by BCG-exposure acts as confounding factor for prostate MRI interpretation. The risk of malignancy and significant tumor on targeted biopsy to PI-RADS 3, 4 and 5 is notably lower in exposed patients.

Automatic text classification of prostate cancer malignancy scores in radiology reports using NLP models.

This paper presents the implementation of two automated text classification systems for prostate cancer findings based on the PI-RADS criteria. Specifically, a traditional machine learning model using XGBoost and a language model-based approach using RoBERTa were employed. The study focused on Spanish-language radiological MRI prostate reports, which has not been explored before. The results demonstrate that the RoBERTa model outperforms the XGBoost model, although both achieve promising results. Furthermore, the best-performing system was integrated into the radiological company's information systems as an API, operating in a real-world environment.

Strategies for improving image quality in prostate MRI.

Prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) stands as the cornerstone in diagnosing prostate cancer (PCa), offering superior detection capabilities while minimizing unnecessary biopsies. Despite its critical role, global disparities in MRI diagnostic performance persist, stemming from variations in image quality and radiologist expertise. This manuscript reviews the challenges and strategies for enhancing image quality in prostate MRI, spanning patient preparation, MRI unit optimization, and radiology team engagement. Quality assurance (QA) and quality control (QC) processes are pivotal, emphasizing standardized protocols, meticulous patient evaluation, MRI unit workflow, and radiology team performance. Additionally, artificial intelligence (AI) advancements offer promising avenues for improving image quality and reducing acquisition times. The Prostate-Imaging Quality (PI-QUAL) scoring system emerges as a valuable tool for assessing MRI image quality. A comprehensive approach addressing technical, procedural, and interpretative aspects is essential to ensure consistent and reliable prostate MRI outcomes.