Image-Guided Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy on Detectable Prostate Bed Recurrence after Prostatectomy in RT-Naïve Patients.

Purpose or Objective-The aim of the study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of SBRT on detectable prostate bed recurrence in RT-naïve prostate cancer patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty-six patients who underwent SBRT for macroscopic bed recurrence after prostatectomy were retrospectively included. Patients were treated based on mpMRI or choline/PSMA PET. RESULTS: The median time to biochemical relapse (BCR) after RP was 46 months, with a median PSA at restaging of 1.04 ng/mL. Forty-six patients were staged with mpMRI and choline/PSMA PET, while ten and thirty were treated based on PET and MRI only, respectively. Only one late G ≥ 2 GI toxicity was observed. With a median BCR follow-up of 14 months, twenty-nine patients experienced a BCR with a median PSA at recurrence of 1.66 ng/mL and a median survival free from the event of 40.1 months. The median time to BCR was 17.9 months. Twenty-seven patients had clinical relapse (CR), with a median CR follow-up of 16.27 months and a median time to CR of 23.0 months. Biochemical recurrence-free survival at one and two years was 88% and 66%, respectively, while clinical recurrence-free survival at one and two years was 92% and 82%, respectively. Regarding local relapses, seven were in the field of treatment, while eight of them were outside the field of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Data showed that SBRT targeting only the macroscopic bed recurrence instead of the whole prostate bed is safe and effective. Additional data and longer follow-ups will provide a clearer indication of the appropriate treatment and staging methodology for these patients.

PSMA-PET follow-up to assess response in patients not receiving PSMA therapy: Is there value beyond localization of disease?

Introduction: Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography (PSMA-PET) is routinely used for the staging of patients with prostate cancer, but data on response assessment are sparse and primarily stem from metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients treated with PSMA radioligand therapy. Still, follow-up PSMA-PET is employed in earlier disease stages in case of clinical suspicion of disease persistence, recurrence or progression to decide if localized or systemic treatment is indicated. Therefore, the prognostic value of PSMA-PET derived tumor volumes in earlier disease stages (i.e., hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (HSPC) and non-[177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 (LuPSMA) therapy castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC)) are evaluated in this manuscript. Methods: A total number of 73 patients (6 primary staging, 42 HSPC, 25 CRPC) underwent two (i.e., baseline and follow-up, median interval: 379 days) whole-body [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT scans between Nov 2014 and Dec 2018. Analysis was restricted to non-LuPSMA therapy patients. PSMA-PETs were retrospectively analyzed and primary tumor, lymph node-, visceral-, and bone metastases were segmented. Body weight-adjusted organ-specific and total tumor volumes (PSMAvol: sum of PET volumes of all lesions) were measured for baseline and follow-up. PSMAvol response was calculated as the absolute difference of whole-body tumor volumes. High metastatic burden (>5 metastases), RECIP 1.0 and PSMA-PET Progression Criteria (PPP) were determined. Survival data were sourced from the cancer registry. Results: The average number of tumor lesions per patient on the initial PET examination was 10.3 (SD 28.4). At baseline, PSMAvol was strongly associated with OS (HR 3.92, p <0.001; n = 73). Likewise, response in PSMAvol was significantly associated with OS (HR 10.48, p < 0.005; n = 73). PPP achieved significance as well (HR 2.19, p <0.05, n = 73). Patients with hormone sensitive disease and poor PSMAvol response (upper quartile of PSMAvol change) in follow-up had shorter outcome (p < 0.05; n = 42). PSMAvol in bones was the most relevant parameter for OS prognostication at baseline and for response assessment (HR 31.11 p < 0.001; HR 32.27, p < 0.001; n = 73). Conclusion: PPP and response in PSMAvol were significantly associated with OS in the present heterogeneous cohort. Bone tumor volume was the relevant miTNM region for OS prognostication. Future prospective evaluation of the performance of organ specific PSMAvol in more homogeneous cohorts seems warranted.

A Comprehensive Analysis of Volumetric 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT Parameters, Clinical and Histopathologic Features: Evaluation of the Predictive Role.

Objectives: To evaluate the relationships between volumetric 68Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) parameters, Gleason score (GS), prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, histopathological data, and metastatic status in newly diagnosed prostate cancer (PCa) patients and to assess the predictive factors for progression despite treatment. Methods: A total of 78 newly diagnosed patients with PCa who had 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT scans were included. Clinical parameters, histopathological data, and metastatic status were documented, and volumetric parameters of primary prostate lesions were measured. All obtained data were compared statistically. Results: Primary prostate tumor maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and GS were significantly related to serum PSA levels (p<0.05). PSA levels and SUVmax values were significantly higher in patients with lymph node metastases than in those without. GS was found to be significantly increased in metastatic patients. PSMA-derived tumor volume (PSMA-TV) and total lesion PSMA of the primary lesion had a significant relationship with PSA value, GS, and regional lymph node metastases. Receiver operating characteristic analysis, conducted in patients with metastatic and localized disease, identified the cutoff value for SUVmax as 10.85. According to the results of the logistic regression analysis, PSMA-TV was found to be a predictive factor for progression despite treatment. Conclusion: 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT remains an invaluable imaging modality that should be considered first in PCa staging because of its superior compatibility with clinical and histopathologic data. The importance of this method goes beyond diagnostic accuracy; it also extends into the predictive domain, where the PSMA-TV value of primary prostate lesions is a potential predictor of treatment efficacy. This information is valuable for personalizing patient treatment, improving prognostic accuracy, and predicting clinical outcomes.

Physiological biodistribution on Ga68-PSMA PET/CT and the factors effecting biodistribution.

AIM: The study aims to determine the physiological and pathophysiological distribution of the radiopharmaceutical (Ga68-PSMA-617) and investigate whether there are differences in distribution according to the laboratory, histopathological and clinical findings that can affect image evaluation. Also, we aimed to determine cut-off values to distinguish physiological and pathological uptake in prostate, bone, and lymph nodes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 229 prostate cancer patients who underwent Ga68-PSMA PET/CT at our department were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were grouped according to PET/CT results, Gleason scores, PSA values, received treatments, metastatic status and other laboratory values. The SUV values of the organs, tissues, and pathological lesions of the patients in these subgroups were compared among themselves. RESULTS: No significant difference was detected in the physiological uptake of lymph nodes and bone between the groups. In the group with patients that received androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), the bone metastasis SUV values were found to be higher and the SUV values of the submandibular gland and renal cortex were found to be lower (Mann-Whitney U, p = 0.043; 0.004; 0.01, respectively). In the group with patients who received radiotherapy, the normal prostate tissue SUV values were determined to be higher (Mann-Whitney U, p = 0.009). The SUV values of the submandibular gland, muscle, liver, and blood pool were found to be lower in the group of patients with high serum LDH values. The cut-off SUVmax value was determined to be 6.945 (sensitivity 89.6%, specificity 98.1%) for primary prostate lesion; 4.72 for lymph node metastasis; 4.25 for bone metastasis. The serum PSA cut-off value to distinguish the negative/positive groups was found to be 1,505 (sensitivity 79.7%, specificity 77.3%). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, PSMA-617 demonstrates a similar biodistribution with other PSMA ligands. The physiological uptake of lymph nodes and bone which are mostly metastasized in prostate cancer, are not affected by the factors we examined. It should be kept in mind that the normal prostate tissue uptake may increase in patients receiving radiotherapy, and the physiological/pathological uptake of the organs may differ due to the changes in PSMA expression in patients receiving ADT, tumor burden, and kidney function may affect the biodistribution.

68Ga-PSMA-11 PET and mpMRI in the diagnosis of initial lymph node staging of prostate cancer: a head-to-head comparative meta-analysis.

Purpose: This meta-analysis evaluates the comparative diagnostic efficacy of 68Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen-11 PET (68Ga-PSMA-11 PET) and multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) for the initial lymph node staging of prostate cancer. Methods: We searched PubMed and Embase databases through October 2023 for studies that provide a head-to-head comparison of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET and mpMRI, using pelvic lymph node dissection as the gold standard. We assessed sensitivity and specificity using the DerSimonian and Laird method, with variance stabilization via the Freeman-Tukey double inverse sine transformation. The quality of included studies was evaluated using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Performance Studies (QUADAS-2) tool. Results: The meta-analysis incorporated 13 articles, involving a total of 1,527 patients. 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET demonstrated an overall sensitivity of 0.73 (95% CI: 0.51-0.91) and a specificity of 0.94 (95% CI: 0.88-0.99). In comparison, mpMRI showed a sensitivity of 0.49 (95% CI: 0.30-0.68) and a specificity of 0.94 (95% CI: 0.88-0.99). Although 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET appeared to be more sensitive than mpMRI, the differences in sensitivity (p = 0.11) and specificity (p = 0.47) were not statistically significant. Conclusion: Our findings indicated that 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET and mpMRI exhibit similar sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of initial lymph node staging of prostate cancer. However, given that most included studies were retrospective, further prospective studies with larger sample sizes are essential to validate these results. Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO code is CRD42023495266.

Treatment and Staging Intensification Strategies Associated with Radical Prostatectomy for High-Risk Prostate Cancer: Efficacy Evaluation and Exploration of Novel Approaches.

The management of high-risk prostate cancer (PCa) presents a significant clinical challenge, often necessitating treatment intensification due to the potential presence of micrometastases. While radical prostatectomy (RP) constitutes one of the primary treatment modalities, the integration of neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies suggests a paradigm shift towards more aggressive treatment strategies, also guided by new imaging modalities like positron emission tomography using prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA-PET). Despite the benefits, treatment intensification raises concerns regarding increased side effects. This review synthesizes the latest evidence on perioperative treatment intensification and de-escalation for high-risk localized and locally advanced PCa patients eligible for surgery. Through a non-systematic literature review conducted via PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov, we explored various dimensions of perioperative treatments, including neoadjuvant systemic therapies, adjuvant therapies, and the role of novel diagnostic technologies. Emerging evidence provides more support for neoadjuvant systemic therapies. Preliminary results from studies suggest the potential for treatments traditionally reserved for metastatic PCa to show apparent benefit in a non-metastatic setting. The role of adjuvant treatments remains debated, particularly the use of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and adjuvant radiotherapy in patients at higher risk of biochemical recurrence. The potential role of radio-guided PSMA lymph node dissection emerges as a cutting-edge approach, offering a targeted method for eradicating disease with greater precision. Innovations such as artificial intelligence and machine learning are potential game-changers, offering new avenues for personalized treatment and improved prognostication. The intensification of surgical treatment in high-risk PCa patients is a dynamic and evolving field, underscored by the integration of traditional and novel therapeutic approaches. As evidence continues to emerge, these strategies will refine patient selection, enhance treatment efficacy, and mitigate the risk of progression, although with an attentive consideration of the associated side effects.

A systematic review on artificial intelligence evaluating PSMA PET scan for intraprostatic cancer.

OBJECTIVES: To assess artificial intelligence (AI) ability to evaluate intraprostatic prostate cancer (PCa) on prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA PET) scans prior to active treatment (radiotherapy or prostatectomy). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This systematic review was registered on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO identifier: CRD42023438706). A search was performed on Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and Engineering Village with the following terms: 'artificial intelligence', 'prostate cancer', and 'PSMA PET'. All articles published up to February 2024 were considered. Studies were included if patients underwent PSMA PET scan to evaluate intraprostatic lesions prior to active treatment. The two authors independently evaluated titles, abstracts, and full text. The Prediction model Risk Of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST) was used. RESULTS: Our search yield 948 articles, of which 14 were eligible for inclusion. Eight studies met the primary endpoint of differentiating high-grade PCa. Differentiating between International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Grade Group (GG) ≥3 PCa had an accuracy between 0.671 to 0.992, sensitivity of 0.91, specificity of 0.35. Differentiating ISUP GG ≥4 PCa had an accuracy between 0.83 and 0.88, sensitivity was 0.89, specificity was 0.87. AI could identify non-PSMA-avid lesions with an accuracy of 0.87, specificity of 0.85, and specificity of 0.89. Three studies demonstrated ability of AI to detect extraprostatic extensions with an area under curve between 0.70 and 0.77. Lastly, AI can automate segmentation of intraprostatic lesion and measurement of gross tumour volume. CONCLUSION: Although the current state of AI differentiating high-grade PCa is promising, it remains experimental and not ready for routine clinical application. Benefits of using AI to assess intraprostatic lesions on PSMA PET scans include: local staging, identifying otherwise radiologically occult lesions, standardisation and expedite reporting of PSMA PET scans. Larger, prospective, multicentre studies are needed.

Comparison of 18F-DCFPyL and 68Ga-PSMA-11 for 177Lu-PSMA-617 therapy patient selection.

Purpose: 68Ga-PSMA-11 is recommended for the selection of patients for treatment in the package insert for 177Lu-PSMA-617. We aimed to compare imaging properties and post-treatment outcomes from radioligand therapy (RLT) of patients selected with 68Ga-PSMA-11 and 18F-DCFPyL. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 80 patients undergoing PSMA RLT, who had pretreatment imaging using either 68Ga-PSMA-11 or 18F-DCFPyL. For both groups, we compared the biodistribution and lesion uptake and the PSA response to treatment. Results: Both agents had comparable biodistribution. Patients initially imaged with 18F-DCFPyL had a higher PSA response (66% vs. 42%), and more patients had a PSA50 response (72% vs. 43%) compared to patients imaged with 68Ga-PSMA-11. Conclusion: 18F-DCFPyL and 68Ga-PSMA-11 had comparable biodistribution and lesion uptake. Patients imaged with 18F-DCFPyL demonstrated clinical benefit to PSMA RLT comparable to those imaged with 68Ga-PSMA-11, and either agent can be used for screening patients.

PSMA PET/CT SUVmax as a prognostic biomarker in patients with metachronous metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC).

BACKGROUND: Metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) is treatment-resistant and generally considered incurable. The development of prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission-computed tomography (PSMA PET/CT) has generated immense expectations due to its diagnostic accuracy in prostate cancer (PCa). PSMA expression of the primary tumor, quantified by SUVmax, is a predictor of oncological outcomes. The role of PSMA-PET/CT SUVmax in metachronous mHSPC treated with ADT plus second-generation antiandrogens (ARSI) is unknown. The main aim of this study was to evaluate 68Ga-PSMA-11expression (SUVmax) as a potential prognostic biomarker in patients with metachronous mHSPC treated with ADT and first or second-generation antiandrogens. A second aim was to determine the association between PSMA SUVmax and PSA response to hormone therapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients diagnosed with metachronous mHSPC between July 2017 and February 2023 who developed biochemical recurrence following radical surgery (with or without salvage radiotherapy and/or ADT) or external radiation therapy (with or without ADT) were included. All patients underwent 68 Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT imaging and the SUVmax value was determined for all measurable locations. The SUVmax value was used for the semiquantitative analysis. The Wilcoxon method was used to compare responders (PSA reduction ≥ 50%) to non-responders (PSA reduction < 50%). The SUVmax value and hormone therapy were evaluated as independent variables relative to the PSA response rate or PSA reduction using the linear regression method. A mixed-effects model (ANOVA) was used for the comparisons. RESULTS: A total of 82 patients were included. Median follow-up was 11.7 months. On the linear regression analysis, patients with a high SUVmax treated with ADT + ARSI showed a greater PSA response (p = 0.034) than those treated with ADT + first-generation antiandrogens. In the mixed-effects model, SUVmax was significant (p = 0.041). On the univariate analysis, PSA at recurrence (HR, 3.2; 95% CI: 1.07-13.6; p = 0.078) and the number of metastases (HR, 4.77; 95% CI 1.1-26.1: p = 0.002) were associated with the type of hormone therapy administered. CONCLUSIONS: PSMA-PET/CT SUVmax is a prognostic biomarker that can be used to predict a PSA response to ADT + ARSI in patients with metachronous mHSPC. However, these findings need to be confirmed in larger prospective studies.

Prostate specific membrane antigen PET avidity in a granular cell tumour of the left supraspinatus muscle: a case report.

Granular cell tumour is a rare, mostly benign, soft tissue, neuroectodermal tumour, most commonly seen in the skin and peripheral soft tissue. There are no publications to date of PSMA-PET avidity in a granular cell tumour. In this 60 year old male, staging PSMA-PET for a localized intermediate risk prostate cancer incidentally identified a PSMA-avid left supraspinatus lesion, which was subsequently biopsy-proven as a granular cell tumour. We present the first case of PSMA-avid granular cell tumour and add to the growing literature documenting PSMA-PET avidity in benign and malignant lesions apart from prostate cancer.

Should new organ involvement be included in Response Evaluation Criteria in PSMA Imaging?

PURPOSE: The current study is intended to investigate the effect of new organ involvement on overall survival (OS) and modify the Response Evaluation Criteria in PSMA Imaging (RECIP) by including new organ involvement to RECIP 1.0. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study includes 114 patients diagnosed with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) between September 2017 and June 2022 who had received docetaxel treatment and had baseline and post-treatment prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) images. The inclusion criteria were patients with pre- and post-treatment [18F]FDG PET/CT images and whose [18F]FDG PET images were negative. Those whose data were unavailable, who had additional malignancy, or who received abiraterone, enzalutamide, or Lutetium (Lu)-177 treatment were excluded. Age, Gleason score (GS), TPSA (total prostate-specific antigen) levels, surgical history, and OS information were recorded for each patient. RESULTS: The 114 patients herein had a median age of 72.5 (51-91) years and a median GS of 8 (7-10). New lesions were observed in 59 patients (51.7%) and new organ PSMA uptake was observed in 14 patients (12.2%). In the multivariate Cox regression analysis, volume-based treatment response (vTR)-total lesion PSMA (TLP), RECIP PSMA-VOL, modified RECIP (mRECIP) PSMA-VOL, and mRECIP TLP were independent prognostic factors for mortality (p < 0.001, p = 0.006, p = 0.003, and p = 0.003, respectively). The median OS of patients with new organ involvement and new lesion with PSMA uptake was 9.3 months (95% CI 2.1-16.5 months) and 11.8 months (95% CI 7.4-16.2 months), respectively. CONCLUSION: The study concluded that new organ involvement had a shorter OS than new lesion involvement. In the mRECIP that we developed, unlike RECIP, we demonstrated that both PSMA-VOL and TLP value were independent prognostic factors for mortality.

Whole pelvis vs. hemi pelvis elective nodal radiotherapy in patients with PSMA-positive nodal recurrence after radical prostatectomy - a retrospective multi-institutional propensity score analysis.

PURPOSE: Despite growing evidence for bilateral pelvic radiotherapy (whole pelvis RT, WPRT) there is almost no data on unilateral RT (hemi pelvis RT, HPRT) in patients with nodal recurrent prostate cancer after prostatectomy. Nevertheless, in clinical practice HPRT is sometimes used with the intention to reduce side effects compared to WPRT. Prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography / computed tomography (PSMA-PET/CT) is currently the best imaging modality in this clinical situation. This analysis compares PSMA-PET/CT based WPRT and HPRT. METHODS: A propensity score matching was performed in a multi-institutional retrospective dataset of 273 patients treated with pelvic RT due to nodal recurrence (214 WPRT, 59 HPRT). In total, 102 patients (51 in each group) were included in the final analysis. Biochemical recurrence-free survival (BRFS) defined as prostate specific antigen (PSA) < post-RT nadir + 0.2ng/ml, metastasis-free survival (MFS) and nodal recurrence-free survival (NRFS) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log rank test. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 29 months. After propensity matching, both groups were mostly well balanced. However, in the WPRT group there were still significantly more patients with additional local recurrences and biochemical persistence after prostatectomy. There were no significant differences between both groups in BRFS (p = .97), MFS (p = .43) and NRFS (p = .43). After two years, BRFS, MFS and NRFS were 61%, 86% and 88% in the WPRT group and 57%, 90% and 82% in the HPRT group, respectively. Application of a boost to lymph node metastases, a higher RT dose to the lymphatic pathways (> 50 Gy EQD2α/ß=1.5 Gy) and concomitant androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) were significantly associated with longer BRFS in uni- and multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, this analysis presents the outcome of HPRT in nodal recurrent prostate cancer patients and shows that it can result in a similar oncologic outcome compared to WPRT. Nevertheless, patients in the WPRT may have been at a higher risk for progression due to some persistent imbalances between the groups. Therefore, further research should prospectively evaluate which subgroups of patients are suitable for HPRT and if HPRT leads to a clinically significant reduction in toxicity.

Comparison of Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT and Multiparametric MRI for Initial Detection and Staging of Prostate Cancer.

Background Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) is widely used for the evaluation of prostate cancer and is known to have better accuracy. Gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen (Ga-68 PSMA) is a radiotracer that shows high localization in prostate cancer cells. Purpose The purpose of this study was to assess the sensitivity and utility of Ga-68 PSMA positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in comparison with mpMRI as a noninvasive imaging technique for the initial diagnosis and locoregional staging of prostate cancer using transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided biopsy as gold standard. Materials and Methods This prospective observational study conducted from August 2017 to April 2020 evaluated 60 men ( n = 60) with biopsy-proven prostate carcinoma. They underwent mpMRI and Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT scans within 14 days with TRUS biopsy being gold standard. T staging of disease, N staging of lymph nodes within the pelvis, and M staging of lesions in pelvic bones (within the imaging field of mpMRI) were compared using PSPP version 1.0.1 statistical software. Results All 60 men with a mean age of 69.9 ± 9.35 years showed Ga-68 PSMA avid disease, whereas 55 were detected by mpMRI. The sensitivity in detection of prostate lesions (with 95% confidence interval) was 99.08% for Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT and 84.40% for mpMRI. Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT detected greater number of patients with regional lymph nodal involvement (19/60) as compared with mpMRI (12/60). Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT showed PSMA avid pelvic skeletal lesions in nine patients, whereas mpMRI detected pelvic lesions in six patients. In addition, four other patients showed extrapelvic skeletal lesions on Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT. Conclusion Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT has superior sensitivity in detection of primary prostate tumor, as compared with mpMRI. Both modalities correlate well in detection of seminal vesicle involvement. Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT outperformed mpMRI in detection of lymph nodal and skeletal metastases. Hence, Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT should be considered as first-line diagnostic modality for carcinoma prostate. Summary Statement : Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT shows superior diagnostic performance than mpMRI in the evaluation of prostate cancer.

Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen-Targeted Imaging and Its Correlation with HOXB13 Expression.

Homeobox 13 (HOXB13) is an oncogenic transcription factor that directly regulates expression of folate hydrolase 1, which encodes prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA). HOXB13 is expressed in primary and metastatic prostate cancers (PCs) and promotes androgen-independent PC growth. Since HOXB13 promotes resistance to androgen receptor (AR)-targeted therapies and regulates the expression of folate hydrolase 1, we investigated whether SUVs on PSMA PET would correlate with HOXB13 expression. Methods: We analyzed 2 independent PC patient cohorts who underwent PSMA PET/CT for initial staging or for biochemical recurrence. In the discovery cohort, we examined the relationship between HOXB13, PSMA, and AR messenger RNA (mRNA) expression in prostate biopsy specimens from 179 patients who underwent PSMA PET/CT with 18F-piflufolastat. In the validation cohort, we confirmed the relationship between HOXB13, PSMA, and AR by comparing protein expression in prostatectomy and lymph node (LN) sections from 19 patients enrolled in 18F-rhPSMA-7.3 PET clinical trials. Correlation and association analyses were also used to confirm the relationship between the markers, LN positivity, and PSMA PET SUVs. Results: We observed a significant correlation between PSMA and HOXB13 mRNA (P < 0.01). The association between HOXB13 and 18F-piflufolastat SUVs was also significant (SUVmax, P = 0.0005; SUVpeak, P = 0.0006). Likewise, the PSMA SUVmax was significantly associated with the expression of HOXB13 protein in the 18F-rhPSMA-7.3 PET cohort (P = 0.008). Treatment-naïve patients with LN metastases demonstrated elevated HOXB13 and PSMA levels in their tumors as well as higher PSMA tracer uptake and low AR expression. Conclusion: Our findings demonstrate that HOXB13 correlates with PSMA expression and PSMA PET SUVs at the mRNA and protein levels. Our study suggests that the PSMA PET findings may reflect oncogenic HOXB13 transcriptional activity in PC, thus potentially serving as an imaging biomarker for more aggressive disease.

68Ga-PSMA PET/CT in Recurrent Prostate Cancer after Radical Prostatectomy Using PSMA-RADS Version 2.0.

BACKGROUND: 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT is superior to standard-of-care imaging for detecting regional and distant metastatic recurrent prostate cancer. The objective of our study was to evaluate the performance of 68Ga-PSMAPET/CT in our patient population, using the new PSMA-RADS version 2.0. METHODS: A total of 128 patients scanned with 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT for detection of recurrence after RP were analyzed with PSMA-RADS version 2.0. For the analysis of the detection rate, categories PSMA-RADS 3 to 5 were considered as "positive for malignancy" and 1-2 as "negative". RESULTS: According to PSMA-RADS v2.0, we classified patients as follows: 23 patients without PSMA-RADS because they were negative; PSMA-RADS 1: 10 patients; PSMA-RADS 2: 4 patients; PSMA-RADS 3A: 11 patients; PSMA-RADS 3B: 2 patients; PSMA-RADS 3C: 2 patients; PSMA-RADS 3D: 2 patients; PSMA-RADS 4: 13 patients; PSMA-RADS 5: 61 patients. CONCLUSIONS: The overall detection rate of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT was 71%. By dividing the patients into fourgroups according to PSA level before examination, we obtained the following detection rates: PSA < 0.2 ng/mL 38%; 0.2 ≤ PSA < 0.5 ng/mL 57%; 0.5 ≤ PSA ≤ 1 ng/mL 77%; and PSA > 1 ng/mL 95%. CONCLUSION: Using PSMA-RADS version 2.0, we obtained detection rate values comparable with recent literature both in absolute terms and in relation to different PSA levels.

Utility of PSMA PET/CT in Staging and Restaging of Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Metaanalysis.

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is expressed in the neovasculature of multiple solid tumors, including renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Studies have demonstrated promising results on the utility of PSMA-targeted PET/CT imaging in RCC. This report aims to provide a systematic review and metaanalysis on the utility and detection rate of PSMA PET/CT imaging in staging or evaluation of primary RCC and restaging of metastatic or recurrent RCC. Methods: Searches were performed in PubMed, Embase, and abstract proceedings (last updated, August 2023). Studies that provided a lesion-level detection rate of PSMA radiotracers in staging or restaging of RCC were included in the metaanalysis. The overall pooled detection rate with a 95% CI was estimated, and subgroup analysis was performed when feasible. Results: Nine studies comprising 152 patients (133 clear cell RCC [ccRCC], 19 other RCC subtypes) were included in the metaanalysis. The pooled detection rate of PSMA PET/CT in evaluation of primary or metastatic RCC was estimated to be 0.83 (95% CI, 0.67-0.92). Subgroup analysis showed a pooled PSMA detection rate of 0.74 (95% CI, 0.57-0.86) in staging or evaluation of primary RCC lesions and 0.87 (95% CI, 0.73-0.95) in restaging of metastatic or recurrent RCC. Analysis based on the type of radiotracer showed a pooled detection rate of 0.85 (95% CI, 0.62-0.95) for 68Ga-based PSMA tracers and 0.92 (95% CI, 0.76-0.97) for 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT. Furthermore, in metastatic ccRCC, the available data support a significantly higher detection rate for 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT than for conventional imaging modalities (2 studies). Conclusion: Our preliminary results show that PSMA PET/CT could be a promising alternative imaging modality for evaluating RCC, particularly metastatic ccRCC. Large prospective studies are warranted to confirm clinical utility in the staging and restaging of RCC.

The additional value of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT SUVmax in predicting ISUP GG ≥ 2 and ISUP GG ≥ 3 prostate cancer in biopsy.

BACKGROUND: Prebiopsy magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) increases the detection rate of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). Prostate-specific membrane antigen-positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PSMA PET/CT) maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of the prostate may offer additional value in predicting the likelihood of csPCa in biopsy. METHODS: A single-center cohort study involving patients with biopsy-proven PCa who underwent both MRI and PSMA PET/CT between 2020 and 2021. Logistic regression models were developed for International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Grade Group (GG) ≥ 2 and GG ≥ 3 using noninvasive prebiopsy parameters: age, (log-)prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density, PI-RADS 5 lesion presence, extraprostatic extension (EPE) on MRI, and SUVmax of the prostate. Models with and without SUVmax were compared using Likelihood ratio tests and area under the curve (AUC). DeLong's test was used to compare the AUCs. RESULTS: The study included 386 patients, with 262 (68%) having ISUP GG ≥ 2 and 180 (47%) having ISUP GG ≥ 3. Including SUVmax significantly improved both models' goodness of fit (p < 0.001). The GG ≥ 2 model had a higher AUC with SUVmax 89.16% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 86.06%-92.26%) than without 87.34% (95% CI: 83.93%-90.76%) (p = 0.026). Similarly, the GG ≥ 3 model had a higher AUC with SUVmax 82.51% (95% CI: 78.41%-86.6%) than without 79.33% (95% CI: 74.84%-83.83%) (p = 0.003). The SUVmax inclusion improved the GG ≥ 3 model's calibration at higher probabilities. CONCLUSION: SUVmax of the prostate on PSMA PET/CT potentially improves diagnostic accuracy in predicting the likelihood of csPCa in prostate biopsy.

Immunohistochemistry analysis of PSMA expression at prostatic biopsy in high-risk prostate cancer: potential implications for PSMA-PET patient selection.

Introduction: Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is a transmembrane protein expressed by normal prostatic tissue. Therefore, molecular imaging targeting PSMA (PSMA-PET) has gained particular interest and diffusion for PCa staging and restaging. Several factors may affect PSMA-PET results, and many tools have been proposed to improve patient selection. Furthermore, PSMA expression is not homogeneous among different tissues and within the prostate itself. The aims of this study were to evaluate immunohistochemistry (IHC) features of prostate biopsy samples and to assess their correlation with whole-mount specimens and PSMA-PET parameters. Methods: We included consecutive high-risk PCa patients who underwent PSMA-PET for staging proposal at our institution from January 2022 to December 2022. The PET parameters selected were SUVmax, total volume (TV), and total lesion activity (TL). Each patient underwent multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) and fusion-targeted prostate biopsy prior to surgery. IHC analyses were performed on the index lesion cores. IHC visual score (VS) (1, 2, 3) and visual pattern (VP) (membranous, cytoplasmic, and combined) and the percentage of PSMA-negative tumor areas (PSMA%neg) within biopsy cores were evaluated. Results: Forty-three patients who underwent robotic radical prostatectomy after PSMA-PET were available for analyses. Concordance between VS and VP at biopsy and final pathology showed a Cohen's kappa coefficient of 0.39 and 0.38, respectively. Patients with PSMA%neg <20% had a higher concordance in VS and VP (Cohen's kappa 0.49 and 0.4, respectively). No difference emerged in terms of median PSMA-TV (p = 0.3) and PSMA-TL (p = 0.9) according to VS at biopsy, while median SUVmax was higher in patients with VS 3 (p = 0.04). Higher SUVmax was associated with membranous and combined VP expression (p = 0.008). No difference emerged between patients with PSMA%neg <20% or PSMA%neg >20% on biopsy cores in terms of SUVmax, PSMA-TL, and PSMA-TV (p = 0.5, p = 0.5, and p = 0.9 respectively). Conclusions: We found a correlation between IHC VS and VP on targeted biopsy cores and SUVmax at PSMA-PET. However, the correlation between the IHC parameters of biopsy cores and final pathology was not as high as expected. Nevertheless, the presence of PSMA%neg <20% seems to have a better concordance in terms of visual score.

Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen: Interpretation Criteria, Standardized Reporting, and the Use of Machine Learning.

Prostate-specific membrane antigen targeting positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET) is routinely used for the staging and restaging of patients with various stages of prostate cancer. For clear communication with referring physicians and to improve inter-reader agreement, the use of standardized reporting templates is mandatory. Increasingly, tumor volume is used by reporting and response assessment frameworks to prognosticate patient outcome or measure response to therapy. However, the quantification of tumor volume is often too time-consuming in routine clinical practice. Machine learning-based tools can facilitate the quantification of tumor volume for improved outcome prognostication.

Evaluation of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT: a Phase 1 clinical study in Japanese patients with primary, recurrent, or suspected recurrent prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted radiopharmaceuticals allow whole-body imaging to detect prostate cancer (PC). Positron emission tomography imaging using gallium-68 (68Ga)-PSMA-11 has been shown to have a favorable safety and tolerability profile and high diagnostic performance. The study evaluates the safety and pharmacokinetics of 68Ga-PSMA-11 in Japanese patients with primary, recurrent, or suspected recurrent prostate cancer. METHODS: This single arm study enrolled Japanese patients with primary PC (n = 3), suspected recurrent PC following radical prostatectomy (n = 4), or suspected recurrent PC following radical radiotherapy (n = 3). All patients received a single intravenous dose of 68Ga-PSMA-11 2.0 MBq/kg (±10%) followed by PSMA PET imaging and safety and pharmacokinetic evaluations. Based on the blood concentrations of 68Ga-PSMA-11 and the radioactivity distribution rate in each organ/tissue, the absorbed doses in major organs/tissues and the whole-body effective dose were calculated by the Medical Internal Radiation Dose method. RESULTS: Ten patients were enrolled. Mean age was 73.3 ± 4.8 years, and median prostate-specific antigen was 8.250 ng/mL. Five patients (50%) experienced a total of 6 adverse events, and no grade ≥ 2 adverse events or serious adverse events were reported. No clinically significant changes in vital signs, haematology parameters, or blood chemistry or ECG abnormalities were observed. The estimated whole body effective dose of 68Ga-PSMA-11 (mean ± standard deviation) was 2.524 × 10-2 ± 2.546 × 10-3 mSv/MBq. Time to maximum concentration (1.16 × 10-4 ± 1.3 × 10-5% ID/mL) in whole blood was 2.15 ± 0.33 min. CONCLUSIONS: 68Ga-PSMA-11 has a favourable safety and tolerability profile in Japanese patients with primary, recurrent, or suspected recurrent prostate cancer, which is comparable to previous observations in other populations.