Validation of MLC leaf open time calculation methods for PSQA in adaptive radiotherapy with tomotherapy units.

BACKGROUND: Treatment delivery safety and accuracy are essential to control the disease and protect healthy tissues in radiation therapy. For usual treatment, a phantom-based patient specific quality assurance (PSQA) is performed to verify the delivery prior to the treatment. The emergence of adaptive radiation therapy (ART) adds new complexities to PSQA. In fact, organ at risks and target volume re-contouring as well as plan re-optimization and treatment delivery are performed with the patient immobilized on the treatment couch, making phantom-based pretreatment PSQA impractical. In this case, phantomless PSQA tools based on multileaf collimator (MLC) leaf open times (LOTs) verifications provide alternative approaches for the Radixact® treatment units. However, their validity is compromised by the lack of independent and reliable methods for calculating the LOT performed by the MLC during deliveries. PURPOSE: To provide independent and reliable methods of LOT calculation for the Radixact® treatment units. METHODS: Two methods for calculating the LOTs performed by the MLC during deliveries have been implemented. The first method uses the signal recorded by the build-in detector and the second method uses the signal recorded by optical sensors mounted on the MLC. To calibrate the methods to the ground truth, in-phantom ionization chamber LOT measurements have been conducted on a Radixact® treatment unit. The methods were validated by comparing LOT calculations with in-phantom ionization chamber LOT measurements performed on two Radixact® treatment units. RESULTS: The study shows a good agreement between the two LOT calculation methods and the in-phantom ionization chamber measurements. There are no notable differences between the two methods and the same results were observed on the different treatment units. CONCLUSIONS: The two implemented methods have the potential to be part of a PSQA solution for ART in tomotherapy.

Forecasting model for qualitative prediction of the results of patient-specific quality assurance based on planning and complexity metrics and their interrelations. Pilot study.

Background: The purpose was to analyse the interrelations between planning and complexity metrics and gamma passing rates (GPRs) obtained from VMAT treatments and build the forecasting models for qualitative prediction (QD) of GPRs results. Materials and method: 802 treatment arcs from the plans prepared for the head and neck, thorax, abdomen, and pelvic cancers were analysed. The plans were verified by portal dosimetry and analysed twice using the gamma method with 3%|2mm and 2%|2mm acceptance criteria. The tolerance limit of GPR was 95%. Red, yellow, and green QDs were established for GPR examination. The interrelations were examined, as well as the analysis of effective differentiation of QD. Three models for QD forecasting based on discriminant analysis (DA), random decision forest (RDF) methods, and the hybrid model (HM) were built and evaluated. Results: Most of the interrelations were small or moderate. The exception is correlations of the join function with the average number of monitor units per control point (R = 0.893) and the beam aperture with planning target volume (R = 0.897). While many metrics allow for the effective separation of the QDs from each other, the study shows that predicting the values of the QD is possible only through multi-component forecasting models, of which the HM is the most accurate (0.894). Conclusion: Of the three models explored in this study, the HM, which uses DA methods to predict red QD and RDF methods to predict green and yellow QDs, is the most promising one.

Technical note: A software tool to extract complexity metrics from radiotherapy treatment plans.

BACKGROUND: Complexity metrics are mathematical quantities designed to quantify aspects of radiotherapy treatment plans that may affect both their deliverability and dosimetric accuracy. Despite numerous studies investigating their utility, there remains a notable absence of shared tools for their extraction. PURPOSE: This study introduces UCoMX (Universal Complexity Metrics Extractor), a software package designed for the extraction of complexity metrics from the DICOM-RT plan files of radiotherapy treatments. METHODS: UCoMX is developed around two extraction engines: VCoMX (VMAT Complexity Metrics Extractor) for VMAT/IMRT plans, and TCoMX (Tomotherapy Complexity Metrics Extractor) tailored for Helical Tomotherapy plans. The software, built using Matlab, is freely available in both Matlab-based and stand-alone versions. More than 90 complexity metrics, drawn from relevant literature, are implemented in the package: 43 for VMAT/IMRT and 51 for Helical Tomotherapy. RESULTS: The package is designed to read DICOM-RT plan files generated by most commercially available Treatment Planning Systems (TPSs), across various treatment units. A reference dataset containing VMAT, IMRT, and Helical Tomotherapy plans is provided to serve as a reference for comparing UCoMX with other in-house systems available at other centers. CONCLUSION: UCoMX offers a straightforward solution for extracting complexity metrics from radiotherapy plans. Its versatility is enhanced through different versions, including Matlab-based and stand-alone, and its compatibility with a wide range of commercially available TPSs and treatment units. UCoMX presents a free, user-friendly tool empowering researchers to compute the complexity of treatment plans efficiently.

Optimization of a commercial portal dose image prediction algorithm for pre-treatment verifications of plans using unflattened photon beams.

Background: The aim was to improve the portal dosimetry-based quality assurance results of conventional treatment plans by adjusting the multileaf collimator (MLC) dosimetric leaf gap (DLG) and transmission (T) values of the anisotropic analytic algorithm (AAA) used for portal dose image prediction (PDIP). Materials and methods: The AAA-based PDIP v. 16.1 algorithm (PDIP-AAA) of the Eclipse TPS was configured for 6 MV FFF energy. Optimal DLG and T values were achieved for this algorithm by comparing predicted versus measured portal images of the Chair pattern. Twenty clinical plans using 6 MV FFF beams were verified using the optimal PDIP-AAA algorithm and the standard PDIP v. 16 algorithm (PDIP-vE), configured using the van Esch package. The 3% global/2 mm gamma passing rates (GPRs) and average gamma indexes (AGIs) were computed for each acquired image. For each plan, the mean GPR (GPRmean) and mean GAI (GAImean) were compared for both algorithms. A 2-tailed Student t-test (α = 0.05) was used to evaluate whether there was a statistically significant difference. Results: Optimal values of DLG = 0.1 mm and T = 0.01 were found for the PDIP-AAA algorithm, providing significantly better values of GPRmean and AGImean than PDIP-vE (p < 0.001). All plans verified with PIDP-AAA showed GPRmean ≥ 95%. In contrast, only 45% of the plans reported GPRmean ≥ 95% with the PDIP-vE algorithm. Conclusions: The MLC parameters available in the PDIP-AAA model must be tuned to improve the accuracy of the predicted dose image. This work-around is not possible using the standard PDIP algorithm. The adjusted PDIP-AAA resulted in significantly better results than PDIP-vE.

Multi-granularity prior networks for uncertainty-informed patient-specific quality assurance.

Deep Learning Automated Patient-Specific Quality Assurance (PSQA) aims to reduce clinical resource requirements. It is vital to ensure the safety and effectiveness of radiation therapy by predicting the dose difference metric (Gamma passing rate) and its distribution. However, current research overlooks uncertainty quantification in model predictions, limiting their trustworthiness in real clinical environments. This paper proposes a Multi-granularity Uncertainty Quantification (MGUQ) framework. A Bayesian framework that quantifies uncertainties at multiple granularities for multi-task PSQA, specifically Gamma Passing Rate (GPR) prediction and Dose Difference Prediction (DDP), integrates visualization-based interactive components. Using Bayesian theory, we derive a comprehensive multi-granularity loss function that comprises granularity-specific loss and coherence loss components. Additionally, we proposed Multi-granularity Prior Networks, a dual-stream network architecture, to infer the distributions of DDP (modeled as t-distributions) and GPR (modeled as Gaussian distributions) under specific statistical assumptions. Comprehensive evaluations are conducted on a dataset from ''Peeking Union Medical College Hospital'', and results show that our proposed method achieves a minimum MAE loss of 0.864 with a 2%/3 mm criterion and realizes the uncertainty visualization of dose difference. Further, it also achieves 100% Clinical Accuracy (CA) with a workload of 67.2%. Experiments demonstrate that the proposed framework can enhance the trustworthiness of deep learning applications in PSQA.

Experience with patient-specific quality assurance of dosimetrist-led online adaptive prostate SBRT.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to assess the results of the local pre-treatment verifications of online adaptive prostate SBRT plans performed by dosimetrists METHODS AND MATERIALS: Prostate SBRT treatments are planned in our department using an online adaptive method developed and validated by our group. The adaptive plans were computed on the daily CBCT scan using the Acuros XB v. 16.1 algorithm of the Varian Eclipse treatment planning system. Adaptive plans consisted of a single VMAT with 6 MV flattening-filter-free (FFF) energy performed on a Varian TrueBeam linac. Pre-treatment verification of the adaptive "plan-of-the-day" (POD) created in each treatment session was performed using the Mobius 3D v. 3.1 secondary dose calculation program (M3D). Commissioning of M3D included the tuning of the dosimetric leaf gap correction (DLGc) parameter. Generic and specific DLGc values were then derived using a set of plans for typical sites (prostate, head and neck, brain, lung and bone palliative) and another set were determined for specific online SBRT PODs (gDLGc and sDLGc, respectively). The first 50 prostate patients treated with the PACE-B schedule (5 × 7.25 Gy) were included, i.e., 250 adaptive SBRT PODs were collected in this study. For each online adaptive POD, a global 3D gamma comparison between the Eclipse 3D dose and the M3D dose in the patient CBCT was performed. Gamma passing rates (GPRs) for the whole external patient contour (Body) and the PTV were recorded, using the 5 % global /3 mm criteria. The target mean dose and target coverage differences between the Eclipse and M3D doses were also analyzed (ΔDmean and ΔD90 %, respectively). The accuracy of M3D was assessed against PRIMO Monte Carlo software. Twenty-five online prostate SBRT PODs were randomly selected from the set of 250 adaptive plans and simulated with PRIMO. RESULTS: Values of -1 mm and -0.14 mm were found as optimal gDLGc and sDLGc, respectively. Over the 250 online adaptive PODs, excellent GPR values ∼ 100 % were obtained for the Body and PTV structures, regardless the type of DLGc used. The use of the sDLGc instead of the gDLGc provided better results for ΔDmean (0.1 % ± 0.5% vs. -1.9 ± 0.7 %) and ΔD90 % (-1.0 % ± 0.5 %. vs. -3.5 % ± 0.8 %). This issue was also observed when M3D calculations were compared to PRIMO simulations. CONCLUSIONS: M3D can be effectively used for independent pre-treatment verifications of online adaptive prostate SBRT plans. The use of a specific DLGc value is advised for this SBRT online adaptive technique.

Feasibility of patient-specific quality assurance (PSQA) for real-time robotic stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) based on tumor motion traces.

PURPOSE: To design a patient specific quality assurance (PSQA) process for the CyberKnife Synchrony system and quantify its dosimetric accuracy using a motion platform driven by patient tumor traces with rotation. METHODS: The CyberKnife Synchrony system was evaluated using a motion platform (MODUSQA) and a SRS MapCHECK phantom. The platform was programed to move in the superior-inferior (SI) direction based on tumor traces. The detector array housed by the StereoPhan was placed on the platform. Extra rotational angles in pitch (head down, 4.0° ± 0.15° or 1.2° ± 0.1°) were added to the moving phantom to examine robot capability of angle correction during delivery. A total of 15 Synchrony patients were performed SBRT PSQA on the moving phantom. All the results were benchmarked by the PSQA results based on static phantom. RESULTS: For smaller pitch angles, the mean gamma passing rates were 99.75% ± 0.87%, 98.63% ± 2.05%, and 93.11% ± 5.52%, for 3%/1 mm, 2%/1 mm, and 1%/1 mm, respectively. Large discrepancy in the passing rates was observed for different pitch angles due to limited angle correction by the robot. For larger pitch angles, the corresponding mean passing rates were dropped to 93.00% ± 10.91%, 88.05% ± 14.93%, and 80.38% ± 17.40%. When comparing with the static phantom, no significant statistic difference was observed for smaller pitch angles (p = 0.1 for 3%/1 mm), whereas a larger statistic difference was observed for larger pitch angles (p < 0.02 for all criteria). All the gamma passing rates were improved, if applying shift and rotation correction. CONCLUSIONS: The significance of this work is that it is the first study to benchmark PSQA for the CyberKnife Synchrony system using realistically moving phantoms with rotation. With reasonable delivery time, we found it may be feasible to perform PSQA for Synchrony patients with a realistic breathing pattern.

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for prostate cancer: Improving treatment delivery efficiency and accuracy.

Purpose: In stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for prostate cancer, intrafraction motion is an important source of treatment uncertainty as it could not be completely smoothed through fractionation. Herein, we compared different arrangements and beam qualities for extreme hypofractionated treatments to minimize beam delivery time and so intrafractional errors. Methods: A retrospective dataset of 11 patients was used. Three volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) beam arrangements were compared for a prescription dose of 40 Gy/5 fractions: two full arcs, 6 MV flattening filter free (FFF); one full arc, 6 MV FFF; one full arc, 10 MV FFF. A plan quality index was defined to compare achievement of the planning goals. Plan complexity was evaluated with the modulation factor. Dose delivery accuracy and efficiency were measured with patient-specific quality assurance plans. Results: All treatment plans fulfilled all dose objectives. No statistical differences were found both in plan quality and complexity. Very accurate dose delivery was achieved with the three arrangements, with mean γ passing rates >96.5 % (2 %/2 mm criteria). Slightly but significantly higher γ passing rates were observed with single-arc 6 MV FFF. Contrariwise, statistically significant reductions of the delivery time were obtained with single-arc geometries: the average delivery times were 1.6 min (-46.1 %) and 1.3 min (-56.2 %) for 6 and 10 MV FFF respectively. Conclusions: The high-quality, very fast and accurate dose delivery of single-arc plans confirmed the suitability of this arrangement for prostate SBRT. In particular, the significant reduction of delivery time would improve treatment robustness against intrafraction prostate motion.

Assessing the sensitivity and suitability of a range of detectors for SIMT PSQA.

PURPOSE: Single-isocenter multi-target intracranial stereotactic radiotherapy (SIMT) is an effective treatment for brain metastases with complex treatment plans and delivery optimization necessitating rigorous quality assurance. This work aims to assess five methods for quality assurance of SIMT treatment plans in terms of their suitability and sensitivity to delivery errors. METHODS: Sun Nuclear ArcCHECK and SRS MapCHECK, GafChromic EBT Radiochromic Film, machine log files, and Varian Portal Dosimetry were all used to measure 15 variations of a single SIMT plan. Variations of the original plan were created with Python. They comprised various degrees of systematic MLC offsets per leaf up to 2 mm, random per-leaf variations with differing minimum and maximum magnitudes, simulated collimator, and dose miscalibrations (MU scaling). The erroneous plans were re-imported into Eclipse and plan-quality degradation was assessed by comparing each plan variation to the original clinical plan in terms of the percentage of clinical goals passing relative to the original plan. Each erroneous plan could be then ranked by the plan-quality degradation percentage following recalculation in the TPS so that the effects of each variation could be correlated with γ pass rates and detector suitability. RESULTS & CONCLUSIONS: It was found that 2%/1 mm is a good starting point for the ArcCHECK, Portal Dosimetry, and the SRS MapCHECK methods, respectively, and provides clinically relevant error detection sensitivity. Looser dose criteria of 5%/1 mm or 5%/1.5 mm are suitable for film dosimetry and log-file-based methods. The statistical methods explored can be expanded to other areas of patient-specific QA and detector assessment.

Dosimetric Systems in Pre-Treatment QA for Stereotactic Treatments: Correlation Agreements and Target Volume Dependency.

AIM: This study comprehensively investigated pre-treatment quality assurance (QA) for 100 cancer patients undergoing stereotactic treatments (SRS/SRT) using various detectors. METHODS: The study conducted QA for SRS/SRT treatments planned with a 6MV SRS beam at a dose rate of 1,000 MU/min, utilizing Eclipse v13.6 Treatment Planning System (TPS). Point dose measurements employed 0.01cm3 and 0.13cm3 cylindrical ionization chambers, while planar dose verification utilized Gafchromic EBT-XD Film and Portal Imager (aS1000). Plans were categorized by target volume, and a thorough analysis compared point dose agreements, planar dose gamma pass rates, and their correlations with chamber volume mean dose, detector type, and point dose agreement. Additionally, the consistency between different ionization chambers was assessed. RESULTS: Point dose agreement generally improved with increasing target volume, except for volumes over 10cm3 with 0.01cm3 chambers, showing a contrary trend. Significant differences (p<0.05) were observed between TPS and measured doses for both chambers. Gamma pass rate improved with increasing target volume in EBT XD and aS1000 analyses, except for the >10cm3 group in EBT XD. EBT XD demonstrated better agreement with TPS for target volumes up to 10cm3 compared to aS1000, with a statistically significant difference (p<0.05) between the detectors. Strong correlations were found between chamber point dose and chamber volume mean dose agreement, as well as between the two gamma criteria analyses of the same detector type in the planar dose correlation analysis. However, weak correlations were discovered for other analyses. CONCLUSION: This study found weak correlation between different detector types in pre-treatment QA for point dose and planar dose evaluation. However, within a specific detector type, strong correlation was observed for different point dose evaluation methods and gamma criteria. This highlights the importance of cautious interpretation of QA results, particularly for SRS QA, due to the lack of correlation between detector types.

Incorporating plan complexity into the statistical process control of volumetric modulated arc therapy pre-treatment verifications.

BACKGROUND: Statistical process control (SPC) is a powerful statistical tool for process monitoring that has been highly recommended in healthcare applications, including radiation therapy quality assurance (QA). The AAPM TG-218 report described the clinical implementation of SPC for Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) pre-treatment verifications, pointing out the need to adjust tolerance limits based on plan complexity. However, the quantification of plan complexity and its integration into SPC remains an unresolved challenge. PURPOSE: The primary aim of this study is to investigate the incorporation of plan complexity into the SPC framework for VMAT pre-treatment verifications. The study explores and evaluates various strategies for this incorporation, discussing their merits and limitations, and provides recommendations for clinical application. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 309 VMAT plans from diverse anatomical sites using the PTW OCTAVIUS 4D device for QA measurements. Gamma Passing Rates (GPR) were obtained, and lower control limits were computed using both the conventional Shewhart method and three heuristic methods (scaled weighted variance, weighted standard deviations, and skewness correction) to accommodate non-normal data distributions. The 'Identify-Eliminate-Recalculate' method was employed for robust analysis. Eight complexity metrics were analyzed and two distinct strategies for incorporating plan complexity into SPC were assessed. The first strategy focused on establishing control limits for different treatment sites, while the second was based on the determination of control limits as a function of individual plan complexity. The study extensively examines the correlation between control limits and plan complexity and assesses the impact of complexity metrics on the control process. RESULTS: The control limits established using SPC were strongly influenced by the complexity of treatment plans. In the first strategy, a clear correlation was found between control limits and average plan complexity for each site. The second approach derived control limits based on individual plan complexity metrics, enabling tailored tolerance limits. In both strategies, tolerance limits inversely correlated with plan complexity, resulting in all highly complex plans being classified as in control. In contrast, when plans were collectively analyzed without considering complexity, all the out-of-control plans were highly complex. CONCLUSIONS: Incorporating plan complexity into SPC for VMAT verifications requires meticulous and comprehensive analysis. To ensure overall process control, we advocate for stringent control and minimization of plan complexity during treatment planning, especially when control limits are adjusted based on plan complexity.

Commissioning and dosimetric verification of volumetric modulated arc therapy for multiple modalities using electronic portal imaging device-based 3D dosimetry system: a novel approach.

The purpose of this study was to validate an electronic portal imaging device (EPID) based 3-dimensional (3D) dosimetry system for the commissioning of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) delivery for flattening filter (FF) and flattening filter free (FFF) modalities based on test suites developed according to American Association of Physicists in Medicine Task Group 119 (AAPM TG 119) and pre-treatment patient specific quality assurance (PSQA).With ionisation chamber, multiple-point measurement in various planes becomes extremely difficult and time-consuming, necessitating repeated exposure of the plan. The average agreement between measured and planned doses for TG plans is recommended to be within 3%, and both the ionisation chamber and PerFRACTION™ measurement were well within this prescribed limit. Both point dose differences with the planned dose and gamma passing rates are comparable with TG reported multi-institution results. From our study, we found that no significant differences were found between FF and FFF beams for measurements using PerFRACTION™ and ion chamber. Overall, PerFRACTION™ produces acceptable results to be used for commissioning and validating VMAT and for performing PSQA. The findings support the feasibility of integrating PerFRACTION™ into routine quality assurance procedures for VMAT delivery. Further multi-institutional studies are recommended to establish global baseline values and enhance the understanding of PerFRACTION™'s capabilities in diverse clinical settings.

Technical note: A simple method for patient-specific quality assurance for lateral targets on a 1.5 T MR-Linac.

The Elekta Unity magnetic resonance (MR) linac is limited to longitudinal couch motion and a sagittal-only laser, which restricts the ability to perform patient-specific quality assurance (PSQA) intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) measurements for very lateral targets. This work introduces a simple method to perform PSQA using the Sun Nuclear ArcCheck-MR phantom at left and right lateral positions without additional equipment or in-house construction. The proposed setup places the center of the phantom 1.3 cm vertical and 12.9 cm lateral to isocenter in either the left or right direction. Computed tomography (CT) scans are used to simulate the setup and create a QA plan template in the Monaco treatment planning system (TPS). The workflow is demonstrated for four patients, with an average axial distance from the center of the bore to the planning target volume (PTV) of 12.4 cm. Gamma pass rates were above 94% for all plans using global 3%/2 mm gamma criterion with a 10% threshold. Setup uncertainties are slightly larger for the proposed lateral setup compared to the centered setup on the Elekta platform (∼1 mm compared to ∼0.5 mm), but acceptable pass rates are achievable without optimizing shifts in the gamma analysis software. In general, adding the left and right lateral positions increases the axial area in the bore encompassed by the cylindrical measurement array by 147%, substantially increasing the flexibility of measurements for offset targets. Based on this work, we propose using the lateral QA setup if the closest distance to the PTV edge from isocenter is larger than the array radius (10.5 cm) or the percent of the PTV encompassed by the diode array would be increased with the lateral setup compared to the centered setup.

Efficacious patient-specific QA for Vertebra SBRT using a high-resolution detector array SRS MapCHECK: AAPM TG-218 analysis.

PURPOSE: Patient-specific quality assurance (PSQA) for vertebra stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) presents challenges due to highly modulated small fields with high-dose gradients between the target and spinal cord. This study aims to explore the use of the SRS MapCHECK® (SRSMC) for vertebra SBRT PSQA. METHODS: Twenty vertebra SBRT treatment plans including prescriptions 20 Gy/1 fraction and 24 Gy/2 fractions were selected for each of Millennium (M)-Multileaf Collimator (MLC), and high-definition (HD)-MLC. All 40 plans were measured using Gafchromic EBT3 film (film) and SRSMC, using the StereoPHAN phantom. Plan complexity was assessed using modulation complexity score (MCS), edge metric (EM) (mm-1), modulation factor (MU/cGy), and average leaf pair opening (ALPO) (mm) and its correlation with gamma-pass rate was investigated. The high dose gradient between the target and the spinal cord was analyzed for film and SRSMC and compared against the treatment planning system (TPS). Applying the methodology proposed by AAPM TG-218, action and tolerance values specific to the SRSMC for vertebra SBRT were determined for ß values ranging from 5 to 8. RESULTS: Film and SRSMC gamma-pass rates showed no correlation (p > 0.05). A moderate negative correlation (R = -0.57, p = 0.01) is present between EM and SRSMC 3%/1 mm gamma-pass rate for HD-MLC plans. Both film and SRSMC accurately measured high dose gradients between the target and the spinal cord (R2 > 0.86, p ≤ 0.05). Notably, dose-gradient of HD-MLC plans is 22% steeper and has a smaller standard deviation to M-MLC plans (p ≤ 0.05). Applying TG-218, the film tolerance limit was 96% with action limit 95% for 5%/1 mm (ß = 6) and for the SRSMC tolerance limit was 97% with an action limit of 96% for 4%/1 mm (ß = 6). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that universal TG-218 limits may not be suitable for vertebra SBRT PSQA. This study demonstrates that SRSMC is a viable tool for vertebra SBRT PSQA, supported by TG-218 implementation of process-based tolerance and action limits.

New optically stimulated luminescence dosimetry film optimized for energy dependence guided by Monte Carlo simulations.

Optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) film dosimeters, based on BaFBr:Eu2+phosphor material, have major dosimetric advantages such as dose linearity, high spatial resolution, film re-usability, and immediate film readout. However, they exhibit an energy-dependent over-response at low photon energies because they are not made of tissue-equivalent materials. In this work, the OSL energy-dependent response was optimized by lowering the phosphor grain size and seeking an optimal choice of phosphor concentration and film thickness to achieve sufficient signal sensitivity. This optimization process combines measurement-based assessments of energy response in narrow x-ray beams with various energy response calculation methods applied to different film metrics. Theoretical approaches and MC dose simulations were used for homogeneous phosphor distributions and for isolated phosphor grains of different dimensions, where the dose in the phosphor grain was calculated. In total 8 OSL films were manufactured with different BaFBr:Eu2+median particle diameters (D50): 3.2µm, 1.5µm and 230 nm and different phosphor concentrations (1.6%, 5.3% and 21.3 %) and thicknesses (from 5.2 to 49µm). Films were irradiated in narrow x-ray spectra (N60, N80, N-150 and N-300) and the signal intensity relative to the nominal dose-to-water value was normalized to Co-60. Finally, we experimentally tested the response of several films in Varian 6MV TrueBeam STx linear accelerator using the following settings: 10 × 10 cm2field, 0deggantry angle, 90 cm SSD, 10 cm depth. The x-ray irradiation experiment reported a reduced energy response for the smallest grain size with an inverse correlation between response and grain size. The N-60 irradiation showed a 43% reduction in the energy over-response when going from 3µm to 230 nm grain size for the 5% phosphor concentration. Energy response calculation using a homogeneous dispersion of the phosphor underestimated the experimental response and was not able to obtain the experimental correlation between grain size and energy response. Isolated grain size modeling combined with MC dose simulations allowed to establish a good agreement with experimental data, and enabled steering the production of optimized OSL-films. The clinical 6 MV beam test confirmed a reduction in energy dependence, which is visible in small-grain films where a decrease in out-of-field over-response was observed.

Comprehensive characterisation of the IBA myQA SRS for SRS and SBRT patient specific quality assurance.

The myQA SRS (IBA) is a new to market 2D complementary metal oxide semiconductor detector array with an active area 140 × 120 mm2 and 0.4 mm resolution, making it a potential real-time dosimetry alternative to radiochromic film for stereotactic plan verification. Characterisation of the device was completed to assess performance. The dosimetric properties of the device were assessed for 6FF and 6FFF beams from a Varian TrueBeam STx with high definition multileaf collimator. Clinical suitability of the device for Patient Specific Quality Assurance was verified using ten SRS/SBRT plans, compared against other detectors, as well as multi leaf collimator (MLC) tests including picket fence and chair. Gamma analysis was performed using myQA software with criteria of 4%/1 mm. The device demonstrated compliance with recommended specifications for basic tests. After the required warm-up period, the maximum deviation in detector signal from initial readings was 0.2%. Short-term and long-term reproducibility was 0.1% (6FF) and 1.0% (6FFF), respectively. Dose linearity was within 0.3% (6FF) and 0.7% (6FFF) and dose-rate dependence within 1.7% (6FF) and 2.9% (6FFF) and were verified with a Farmer type ionization chamber (PTW 30013). Angular dependence was quantified for coplanar and non-coplanar situations. Output factors and beam profiles measured on the device showed agreement within 1% of baseline RAZOR diode (IBA) and CC04 ionisation chamber (IBA) measurements for field sizes 1 × 1 to 10 × 10 cm2. The minimum gamma (4%/1 mm) pass rates for MLC-pattern tests were 96.5% and 98.1% for the myQA SRS and film, respectively. The average gamma (4%/1 mm) pass rates for SBRT and SRS plans were 98.8% and 99.8% respectively. This work represents one of the first studies performed on the commissioning and performance characterisation of this novel device, demonstrating its accuracy and reliability, making it highly useful as a film alternative in stereotactic treatment plan verification.

Is it still necessary to perform measured based pre-treatment patient-specific QA for SRS HyperArc treatments?

PURPOSE: The Mobius3D system was validated as a modern secondary check dosimetry system. In particular, our objective has been to assess the suitability of the M3D as pre-treatment patient-specific Quality Assurance (QA) tool for Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS) HyperArc (HA) treatments. We aimed to determine whether Mobius3D could safely replace the measurements-based patient-specific QA for this type of treatment. METHODS: 30 SRS HA treatment plans for brain were selected. The dose distributions, calculated by Mobius and our routinely used algorithm (AcurosXB v.15.6), were compared using gamma analysis index and DVH parameters based on the patient's CT dataset. All 30 plans were then delivered across the ionization chamber in a homogeneous phantom and the measured dose was compared with both M3D and TPS calculated one. The plans were delivered and verified in terms of PSQA using the electronic portal imaging device (EPID) with Portal Dosimetry (PD) and myQA SRS (IBA Dosimetry) detector. Plans that achieved a global gamma passing rate (GPR) ≥ 97% based on 2%/2 mm criteria, with both Mobius3D and the conventional methods were evaluated acceptable. Finally, we assessed the capability of the M3D system to detect errors related to the position of the Multi-Leaf Collimator (MLC) in comparison to the analyzed measurement-based systems. RESULTS: No relevant differences were observed in the comparison between the dose calculated on the CT-dataset by M3D and the TPS. Observed discrepancies are imputable to different used algorithms, but no discrepancies related to goodness of plans have been found. Average differences between calculated (M3D and TPS) vs measured dose with ionization chamber were 2.5% (from 0.41% to 3.2%) and 1.81% (from 0.66% to 2.65%), for M3D and TPS, respectively. All plans passed with a gamma passing rate > 97% using conventional PSQA methods with a gamma criterion of 2% dose difference and 2 mm distance-to-agreement. The average gamma passing rate for the M3D system was determined to be 99.4% (from 97.3% to 100%). Results from this study also demonstrated Mobius has better error detectability than conventional measurement-based systems. CONCLUSION: Our study shows Mobius3D could be a suitable alternative to conventional measured based QA methods for SRS HyperArc treatments.

Patient specific quality assurance of volumetric modulated arc therapy of synchronous bilateral breast cancer.

Synchronous bilateral breast cancers (SBBC) present a considerable issue in external beam radiotherapy because of large fields size and large target volumes. Mono-isocentric volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) appears as an appropriate irradiation technique for these types of tumors. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the utility of a 3D DVH pretreatment quality assurance program in VMAT of SBBC cases. Twenty SBBC patients who underwent radiation therapy in our department were retrospectively enrolled in this study. Fifteen patients were treated exclusively to the mammary glands. Five patients benefited from a dose boost on the tumor bed (60Gy). Nine patients were irradiated on the supraclavicular nodes (50Gy). This dose was delivered in 25 fractions and integrated boost was used when appropriate. Depending on the complexity of the treatment plans; 2 or 4 arcs VMAT plans were used in a mono-isocentric technique. The patient specific quality assurance (PSQA) was evaluated using COMPASS measured data, COMPASS reconstructed (CR) and COMPASS computed (CC) dose compared to treatment planning system (TPS) dose. Clinical evaluation was based on DVH metrics for target volumes and organ at risks. The maximum average dose deviation between TPS, CC, and CR was below 3%. The paired t-test between TPS, CC, and CR shows a strong agreement (p < 0.001). The 3DVH dose distribution comparison between TPS and COMPASS were also performed with good gamma score for global analysis. COMPASS was successfully evaluated as a 3DVH pretreatment system for SBBC despite the large fields size and complex target volumes. It allows the verification of the plan in 3D patient anatomy and the evaluation of dose discrepancies.

Isodose surface differences: A novel tool for the comparison of dose distributions.

BACKGROUND: Comparing dose distributions is a routine task in radiotherapy, mainly in patient-specific quality assurance (PSQA). Currently, the evaluation of the dose distributions is being performed mainly with statistical methods, which could underestimate the clinical importance of the spotted differences, as per the literature. PURPOSE: This paper aims to provide proof-of-concept for a novel dose distribution comparison method based on the difference of the isodose surfaces. The new method connects acceptance tolerance to QA limitations (equipment capabilities) and integrates a clinical approach into the analysis procedure. METHODS: The distance of dose points from the isocenter can be used as a function to define the shape of an isodose surface expressed as a histogram. Isodose surface differences (ISD) are defined as the normalized differences of reference and evaluated surface histograms plotted against their corresponding isodose. Acceptance tolerances originate from actual QA tolerances and are presented clinically intuitively. The ISD method was compared to the gamma index using intentionally erroneous VMAT and IMRT plans. RESULTS: Results revealed that the ISD method is sensitive to all errors induced in the plans. Discrepancies are presented per isodose, enabling the evaluation of the plan in two regions representing PTV and Normal Tissue. ISD manages to flag errors that would remain undetected under the gamma analysis. CONCLUSION: The ISD method is a meaningful, QA-related, registration-free, and clinically oriented technique of dose distribution evaluation. This method can be used either as a standalone or an auxiliary tool to the well-established evaluation procedures, overcoming significant limitations reported in the literature.

Patient-specific quality assurance strategies for synthetic computed tomography in magnetic resonance-only radiotherapy of the abdomen.

Background and purpose: The superior tissue contrast of magnetic resonance (MR) compared to computed tomography (CT) led to an increasing interest towards MR-only radiotherapy. For the latter, the dose calculation should be performed on a synthetic CT (sCT). Patient-specific quality assurance (PSQA) methods have not been established yet and this study aimed to assess several software-based solutions. Materials and methods: A retrospective study was performed on 20 patients treated at an MR-Linac, which were selected to evenly cover four subcategories: (i) standard, (ii) air pockets, (iii) lung and (iv) implant cases. The neural network (NN) CycleGAN was adopted to generate a reference sCT, which was then compared to four PSQA methods: (A) water override of body, (B) five tissue classes with bulk densities, (C) sCT generated by a separate NN (pix2pix) and (D) deformed CT. Results: The evaluation of the dose endpoints demonstrated that while all methods A-D provided statistically equivalent results (p = 0.05) within the 2% level for the standard cases (i), only the methods C-D guaranteed the same result over the whole cohort. The bulk densities override was shown to be a valuable method in absence of lung tissue within the beam path. Conclusion: The observations of this study suggested that the use of an additional sCT generated by a separate NN was an appropriate tool to perform PSQA of a sCT in an MR-only workflow at an MR-Linac. The time and dose endpoints requirements were respected, namely within 10 min and 2%.