Conventional cytology scheme: adherence and associated factors.

OBJECTIVES: This study analyzed adherence rates to conventional cytology and associated factors in a cohort of women at a health service provider institution in Medellin, Colombia. STUDY DESIGN: Observational cohort study with repeated measures. METHODS: Clinical and sociodemographic data were obtained from databases for screenings between January 2018 and December 2022. Adherence, defined as undergoing 1, 2, or 3 cytology tests according to national guidelines, was the outcome. Statistical analysis involved a Poisson model with robust errors to identify factors associated with adherence. RESULTS: In total, 26,445 women were included, with a median age of 25 years (IQR: 22-27). Adherence rate was 20.4%. Having just high school education (RR = 0.51; 95% CI: 0.49-0.55), a history of pregnancy (RR = 0.63; 95% CI: 0.54-0.75), and a history of sexually transmitted infections (RR = 0.88; 95% CI: 0.78-0.99) decreased adherence. Conversely, the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination history increased adherence (RR = 2.11; 95% CI: 1.60-2.80). CONCLUSION: It is vital to monitor cytology programs to improve demand-induced and spontaneous consultations. Diligent follow-up, focusing on patients with factors linked to low adherence, along with appointment reminders, can enhance adherence to the screening protocol.

The Impact of Social Support on Health Outcomes of Diabetic Patients: A Systematic Review.

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a common chronic disease worldwide. The prevalence of T2DM has consistently increased over the past few decades. Factors affecting patient management of diabetes are important in preventing diabetic complications. Social support has been cited as one of the most important aspects of managing chronic conditions. This systematic review aims to consolidate the existing literature discussing the impact of social support on managing type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) and T2DM. To begin our review, the Ovid MEDLINE (Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online) database was searched for all current literature on social support and diabetes health outcomes. Articles were then included and removed according to specific inclusion and exclusion criteria, and a systematic review was performed on the remaining articles. Twenty-two papers that met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were selected, and after data collection, a significant correlation was found between social support and health outcomes of diabetic patients and most articles reported that social support improves the health outcomes of diabetic patients. Studies show that there is some correlation between social support and improved health outcomes for diabetic patients. Further studies should be done to determine the exact correlations between social support and T2DM management and to explore the long-term impacts of social support on health outcomes for diabetic patients.

Dysphagia Prevalence in Brazil, UK, China, and Indonesia and Dysphagic Patient Preferences.

BACKGROUND: Dysphagia is common, but there is limited information about its prevalence and patient preferences regarding dosage forms (oral solids, liquids, topical, etc.) in Brazil, China, the United Kingdom (UK), and Indonesia. METHODS: We conducted an online survey of 1000 adults from each country, without any required disease, to estimate the prevalence of dysphagia in these four nations and the dosage form preferences among UK patients. RESULTS: A total of 36.9%, 40.5%, 54.9%, and 64.5% from the UK, Indonesia, Brazil, and China, respectively, had an Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10) score of ≥3 (indicative of dysphagia). Only 2% of UK respondents and 5% of Brazilian respondents reported a formal diagnosis of dysphagia. Indonesian (74%) and Chinese respondents (77%) were more likely than Brazilian (52%) and UK respondents (45%) to report that their swallowing problems affected their ability to adhere to medication instructions. Liquids were the oral medication formulation most preferred by those who reported difficulty swallowing. CONCLUSIONS: To conclude, substantial populations have difficulty swallowing, which can translate into an access issue for medical treatment. The availability of people's preferred dosage forms may help alleviate the adherence issues associated with difficulty swallowing and the concomitant effects on health outcomes.

Patient-centered care in diabetes care-concepts, relationships and practice.

We still do not have comprehensive knowledge of which framework of patient-centered care (PCC) is appropriate for diabetes care, which elements of PCC are evidence-based, and the mechanism by which PCC elements are associated with outcomes through mediators. In this review, we elaborate on these issues. We found that for diabetes care, PCC elements such as autonomy support (patient individuality), cooperation and collaboration (system-level approach), com-munication and education (behavior change techniques), emotional support (biopsychosocial approach), and family/other involvement and support are critically important. All of these factors are directly associated with different patient outcomes and indirectly associated with outcomes through patient activation. We present the practical implications of these PCC elements.

Remote monitoring system to support positive airway pressure therapy in patients with obstructive sleep apnea: a multi-center randomized controlled trial.

PURPOSE: To develop and evaluate an intervention tailored to patients' needs to increase the rate of positive airway pressure (PAP) adherence in patients afflicted with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), who undergo PAP therapy. METHODS: A multi-center, 3 parallel-arm, randomized, controlled trial was conducted. Participants with OSA who undergo a PAP therapy were randomized to one of three groups: control arm (usual care), educational booklet arm, and mobile-based application arm. PAP usage, the percentage of days using the device for more than 4 h, change in knowledge, risk perception, outcome expectancy, self-efficacy, and ESS were assessed before and one month after interventions in the three groups. Also, the application usage data were analyzed. RESULTS: The result showed the change in average PAP usage, knowledge, risk perception, and self-efficacy in the application group was significantly higher than the control and booklet groups. Also, the change in use for more than 4 h in the application group was significantly higher than the control group. Comparing the actual and patients' self-report PAP use indicated patients' self-report about the use of the device is about 50 min (0.8 h) more than the actual amount of use. CONCLUSION: The study results indicated that the improvement of primary and secondary outcomes in adherence to PAP was significantly higher in the application group than in other study groups. Given the increasingly penetrating influence of smartphone-based technologies, it seems that mobile-based applications could potentially be adopted in the population of patients with OSA. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: IRCT2017092236314N1; https://en.irct.ir/trial/27185.

A clinician's guide to single vs multiple inhaler therapy for COPD.

INTRODUCTION: In the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), inhalation therapy plays a pivotal role. However, clinicians often face the dilemma of choosing between single and multiple inhaler therapies for their patients. This choice is critical because it can affect treatment efficacy, patient adherence, and overall disease management. AREAS COVERED: This article examines the advantages and factors to be taken into consideration when selecting between single and multiple inhaler therapies for COPD. EXPERT OPINION: Both single and multiple inhaler therapies must be considered in COPD management. While single inhaler therapy offers simplicity and convenience, multiple inhaler therapy provides greater flexibility and customization. Clinicians must carefully evaluate individual patient needs and preferences to determine the most appropriate inhaler therapy regimen. Through personalized treatment approaches and shared decision-making, clinicians can optimize COPD management and improve patient well-being. Nevertheless, further research is required to compare the effectiveness of single versus multiple inhaler strategies through rigorous clinical trials, free from industry bias, to determine the optimal inhaler strategy. Smart inhaler technology appears to have the potential to enhance adherence and personalized management, but the relative merits of smart inhalers in single inhaler regimens versus multiple inhaler regimens remain to be determined.

Study protocol for a non-inferiority, multicenter, randomized study to evaluate a smartphone app-based follow-up program after bariatric surgery (BELLA plus trial).

INTRODUCTION: Adherence to follow-up (FU) care after bariatric surgery is poor despite strong recommendations. In our pilot Bella trial, we demonstrated that a completely remote follow-up program via smartphone is feasible and safe for patients after bariatric surgery. Building on this, we aim to verify our results in a multicenter, randomized controlled setting. METHODS: This trial plans to enroll 410 participants undergoing primary bariatric surgery in seven German bariatric centers. Participants are randomized into two groups: a control group receiving in-person FU according to the standard in the bariatric centers, and an interventional group monitored using a smartphone application (app). The app sends standardized questionnaires and reminders regarding regular vitamin intake and exercises. The built-in messaging function enables patients to communicate remotely with medical care professionals. After one year, all participants are evaluated at their primary bariatric centers. The primary outcome is weight loss 12 months after surgery. The secondary outcomes include obesity-related comorbidities, quality of life, serum values of vitamins and minerals, body impedance analysis, visits to the emergency department or readmission, patient compliance, and medical staff workload. DISCUSSION: The current study is the first prospective, individually randomized-controlled, multicenter trial where a mobile application completely replaces traditional in-person visits for post-bariatric surgery follow-ups in bariatric centers.

The Role of Telemedicine in Voice Therapy.

Introduction: During the COVID-19 pandemic, our institution adopted telemedicine for voice therapy (VT) as an alternative to in-person sessions, which has been integrated into our routine practice following the pandemic. This study aims to explore factors influencing completion rates among the 2 methods. Method: A retrospective chart review at a single tertiary care institution between 2019 and 2021 was conducted. Patient zip codes were used to determine Neighborhood Atlas® Area Deprivation Index (ADI) scores and travel distance to our institution. Demographic data, Voice Handicap Index (VHI) scores, and completion status were extracted. Results: Between 2019 and 2021, 521 patients were referred to VT at our institution, with 29% opting for telemedicine VT (TVT) sessions and 71% choosing in-person sessions. Seventy-four percent was female, and average age was 57.1 years (range:10-89 years old). No statistically significant differences were observed between the 2 groups regarding sex, age, employment status, or insurance type. Participants in the TVT group demonstrated notably higher completion rates compared to the in-person group [70.0% vs 31.6% (P < .001)]. The TVT group also comprised of a higher percentage of white patients, reported longer travel distances and times to reach therapy, but had comparable ADI scores to the in-person group. Moreover, there were no significant differences in pretreatment VHI scores between the 2 groups or between those who completed therapy versus those who did not (P = .501). Conclusion: Our findings indicate that patients utilizing the telemedicine platform had significantly higher VT completion rates compared to patients appearing in person. These results highlight the importance of being able to offer telemedicine-based options in the management of voice patients.

Impact of Socioeconomic Status on Patient Adherence in Managing Renal Masses.

INTRODUCTION: Previous literature suggests socioeconomic status and racial disparities impact management decisions for patients with small renal masses. We aim to build upon these findings and examine how these modalities impact patient adherence to their management plan. METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed our Kidney Tumor Program database (n = 1476) containing patients from 2000 to 2020. Socioeconomic status was estimated using 2 modalities: Area Deprivation Index and household income. Patients were then evaluated for differences in adherence, nonadherence, and loss to follow-up. Adherent patients completed all recommended appointments within 6 months of their initial follow-up. Nonadherent patients did not complete all recommended appointments within 6 months of their originally scheduled follow-up but eventually did. Patients lost to follow-up were recommended to follow up but never did. RESULTS: Patient adherence was not significantly different across sex or primary treatment method but differed with respect to race/ethnicity. Black patients were significantly more likely to be nonadherent (P = .021) and lost to follow-up (P = .008). After adjusting for race/ethnicity, Area Deprivation Index and income bracket were significantly associated with adherence and loss to follow-up. Patients with a high socioeconomic status had significantly higher rates of adherence (ADI, quartile [Q] 1 vs Q4, P = .038; income, >$120,000 vs $30,000-$59,999, P < .003) and decreased loss to follow-up (ADI, Q1 vs Q4, P = .03; income, >$120,000 vs $30,000-$59,999, P = .002). CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that Black race and low socioeconomic status are associated with decreased adherence and increased loss to follow-up. Possible strategies to target these disparities include financial assistance programming, social determinants of health screening, and nurse navigator programs.

Clinical Pharmacology of Oral Octreotide Capsules for the Treatment of Acromegaly.

The primary goal of acromegaly treatment is to normalize biochemical parameters as it significantly reduces the risks of complications and comorbidities associated with the disease. First-line medical treatment is commonly represented by injectable somatostatin analogues (SRLs) after surgery. In June 2020, with the integration of Transient Permeation Enhancer® technology, oral octreotide capsules (OOCs) received regulatory approval from the US Food and Drug Administration for long-term maintenance treatment in patients with acromegaly who have responded to and tolerated treatment with octreotide or lanreotide. We reviewed the clinical pharmacological data on the development and clinical use of OOCs. The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data on OOCs showed a dose-dependent increase in octreotide levels and remarkable suppression of growth hormone secretion. The efficacy and safety of OOCs were investigated in four clinical trials conducted on patients with complete or partially controlled acromegaly. The trials resulted in the maintenance of biochemical control after switching from injectable SRLs to OOCs, with a comparable side-effect profile. Moreover, the acromegaly symptoms improved in patients on OOC. The data showed a patient preference to continue in the OOC arm for the extension phase of the trials. From the clinical pharmacological perspective, oral formulation of octreotide has the advantage of efficacy and safety with respect to injectable octreotide.

Factors and Reasons Associated With Appointment Non-attendance in Hospitals: A Narrative Review.

Non-attendance at hospital appointments is an extremely prevalent issue impacting healthcare systems on a daily basis. This phenomenon adversely affects patient health and healthcare providers, leading to delays in diagnosis and treatment, inefficient resource utilization, and increased healthcare expenses. The detrimental impact of non-attendance is not limited to patients who miss appointments, the knock-on effects of extended waiting times and reduced appointment availability are felt throughout healthcare systems. The purpose of this narrative review is to explore the factors underlying appointment non-attendance in hospital settings, to improve healthcare delivery and patient adherence. An extensive review of the existing global literature was conducted. Quantitative studies that explored the relationship between appointment non-attendance and patient characteristics, such as age, gender, marital status, education level, distance from the hospital, and source of referral, were included. Younger patients, males, individuals with lower levels of education, and those living farther from hospitals were more likely to miss appointments. Marital status was significant, with married patients showing better attendance, as was referral source, with general practitioner referrals associated with higher non-attendance. Qualitative studies identifying both patient-centered and hospital-specific reasons, such as forgetfulness, appointment time, protracted waiting times, patient-physician relationship, and patients' knowledge and perception of their health condition, were also included in the review. Lack of appointment reminders, difficulties in managing appointments, and inadequate patient-physician communication were significant hospital-specific reasons given for non-attendance. Patients' lack of awareness regarding the importance of attending appointments and limited understanding of their health conditions were also identified as patient-centered contributors. Non-attendance at hospital appointments is a multifaceted issue influenced by a range of socioeconomic, personal, and systemic factors. Addressing these factors requires a holistic approach that includes patient education, improved communication, and tailored healthcare delivery strategies, especially for vulnerable populations in rural areas. Enhanced reminder systems and streamlined appointment management could serve as pivotal interventions to reduce non-attendance rates, ultimately improving healthcare outcomes and resource utilization.

Empowering Low-Income Patients with Home Blood Pressure Monitors to Improve Hypertension Control.

INTRODUCTION: Effective management of hypertension (HTN) is a priority in primary care. With telehealth now considered a staple care delivery method, uninsured and low-income patients without home blood pressure (BP) monitors may need additional attention and resources to achieve successful HTN control. METHODS: This prospective study at an underserved community clinic assessed the impact of distributing free BP monitors on patients' HTN control and therapy adherence. Enrollees were randomized into 2 groups, both completing 4 primary care physician (PCP) visits over a 6-month study period. Intervention participants collected home BP readings to report to their PCP and comparison participants completed an equivalent number of visits without having home BP data available for their PCP to review. Both groups completed an initial and final Therapy Adherence Scale (TAS) questionnaire. RESULTS: 263 patients were invited and 200 participants (mean age 50, 60% female, 19% Black, 67% Hispanic) completed the study. Intervention and comparison subjects featured comparable initial BP levels and TAS scores. After adjusting for age, race, ethnicity, sex, presence of diabetes and therapy adherence, intervention participants experienced higher odds of controlled HTN (OR 4.0; 95% Confidence Interval 2.1 to 7.7). A greater proportion of participants achieved BP control in the intervention arm compared with the comparison arm (82% vs 54% of participants, P < .001). TAS scores were higher in the intervention group (Mean = 44.1 vs 41.1; P < .001). DISCUSSION: The provision of free home BP monitors to low-income patients may feasibly and effectively improve BP control and therapy adherence.

Cross-Cutting mHealth Behavior Change Techniques to Support Treatment Adherence and Self-Management of Complex Medical Conditions: Systematic Review.

Background: Mobile health (mHealth) interventions have immense potential to support disease self-management for people with complex medical conditions following treatment regimens that involve taking medicine and other self-management activities. However, there is no consensus on what discrete behavior change techniques (BCTs) should be used in an effective adherence and self-management-promoting mHealth solution for any chronic illness. Reviewing the extant literature to identify effective, cross-cutting BCTs in mHealth interventions for adherence and self-management promotion could help accelerate the development, evaluation, and dissemination of behavior change interventions with potential generalizability across complex medical conditions. Objective: This study aimed to identify cross-cutting, mHealth-based BCTs to incorporate into effective mHealth adherence and self-management interventions for people with complex medical conditions, by systematically reviewing the literature across chronic medical conditions with similar adherence and self-management demands. Methods: A registered systematic review was conducted to identify published evaluations of mHealth adherence and self-management interventions for chronic medical conditions with complex adherence and self-management demands. The methodological characteristics and BCTs in each study were extracted using a standard data collection form. Results: A total of 122 studies were reviewed; the majority involved people with type 2 diabetes (28/122, 23%), asthma (27/122, 22%), and type 1 diabetes (19/122, 16%). mHealth interventions rated as having a positive outcome on adherence and self-management used more BCTs (mean 4.95, SD 2.56) than interventions with no impact on outcomes (mean 3.57, SD 1.95) or those that used >1 outcome measure or analytic approach (mean 3.90, SD 1.93; P=.02). The following BCTs were associated with positive outcomes: self-monitoring outcomes of behavior (39/59, 66%), feedback on outcomes of behavior (34/59, 58%), self-monitoring of behavior (34/59, 58%), feedback on behavior (29/59, 49%), credible source (24/59, 41%), and goal setting (behavior; 14/59, 24%). In adult-only samples, prompts and cues were associated with positive outcomes (34/45, 76%). In adolescent and young adult samples, information about health consequences (1/4, 25%), problem-solving (1/4, 25%), and material reward (behavior; 2/4, 50%) were associated with positive outcomes. In interventions explicitly targeting medicine taking, prompts and cues (25/33, 76%) and credible source (13/33, 39%) were associated with positive outcomes. In interventions focused on self-management and other adherence targets, instruction on how to perform the behavior (8/26, 31%), goal setting (behavior; 8/26, 31%), and action planning (5/26, 19%) were associated with positive outcomes. Conclusions: To support adherence and self-management in people with complex medical conditions, mHealth tools should purposefully incorporate effective and developmentally appropriate BCTs. A cross-cutting approach to BCT selection could accelerate the development of much-needed mHealth interventions for target populations, although mHealth intervention developers should continue to consider the unique needs of the target population when designing these tools.

Establishment and validation of an adherence prediction system for lifestyle interventions in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.

BACKGROUND: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most common liver disease worldwide, affecting about 1/4th of the global population and causing a huge global economic burden. To date, no drugs have been approved for the treatment of NAFLD, making the correction of unhealthy lifestyles the principle method of treatment. Identifying patients with poor adherence to lifestyle correction and attempting to improve their adherence are therefore very important. AIM: To develop and validate a scale that can rapidly assess the adherence of patients with NAFLD to lifestyle interventions. METHODS: The Exercise and Diet Adherence Scale (EDAS) was designed based on compilation using the Delphi method, and its reliability was subsequently evaluated. Demographic and laboratory indicators were measured, and patients completed the EDAS questionnaire at baseline and after 6 months. The efficacy of the EDAS was evaluated in the initial cohort. Subsequently, the efficacy of the EDAS was internally verified in a validation cohort. RESULTS: The EDAS consisted of 33 items in six dimensions, with a total of 165 points. Total EDAS score correlated significantly with daily number of exercise and daily reduction in calorie intake (P < 0.05 each), but not with overall weight loss. A total score of 116 was excellent in predicting adherence to daily reduction in calorie intake (> 500 kacl/d), (sensitivity/specificity was 100.0%/75.8%), while patients score below 97 could nearly rule out the possibility of daily exercise (sensitivity/specificity was 89.5%/44.4%). Total EDAS scores ≥ 116, 97-115, and < 97 points were indicative of good, average, and poor adherence, respectively, to diet and exercise recommendations. CONCLUSION: The EDAS can reliably assess the adherence of patients with NAFLD to lifestyle interventions and have clinical application in this population.

Patients' Perspectives on Plans Generated During Primary Care Visits and Self-Reported Adherence at 3 Months: Data From a Randomized Trial.

BACKGROUND: Effective primary care necessitates follow-up actions by the patient beyond the visit. Prior research suggests room for improvement in patient adherence. OBJECTIVE: This study sought to understand patients' views on their primary care visits, the plans generated therein, and their self-reported adherence after 3 months. METHODS: As part of a large multisite cluster randomized pragmatic trial in 3 health care organizations, patients completed 2 surveys-the first within 7 days after the index primary care visit and another 3 months later. For this analysis of secondary outcomes, we combined the results across all study participants to understand patient adherence to care plans. We recorded patient characteristics and survey responses. Cross-tabulation and chi-square statistics were used to examine bivariate associations, adjusting for multiple comparisons when appropriate. We used multivariable logistic regression to assess how patients' intention to follow, agreement, and understanding of their plans impacted their plan adherence, allowing for differences in individual characteristics. Qualitative content analysis was conducted to characterize the patient's self-reported plans and reasons for adhering (or not) to the plan 3 months later. RESULTS: Of 2555 patients, most selected the top box option (9=definitely agree) that they felt they had a clear plan (n=2011, 78%), agreed with the plan (n=2049, 80%), and intended to follow the plan (n=2108, 83%) discussed with their provider at the primary care visit. The most common elements of the plans reported included reference to exercise (n=359, 14.1%), testing (laboratory, imaging, etc; n=328, 12.8%), diet (n=296, 11.6%), and initiation or adjustment of medications; (n=284, 11.1%). Patients who strongly agreed that they had a clear plan, agreed with the plan, and intended to follow the plan were all more likely to report plan completion 3 months later (P<.001) than those providing less positive ratings. Patients who reported plans related to following up with the primary care provider (P=.008) to initiate or adjust medications (P≤.001) and to have a specialist visit were more likely to report that they had completely followed the plan (P=.003). Adjusting for demographic variables, patients who indicated intent to follow their plan were more likely to follow-through 3 months later (P<.001). Patients' reasons for completely following the plan were mainly that the plan was clear (n=1114, 69.5%), consistent with what mattered (n=1060, 66.1%), and they were determined to carry through with the plan (n=887, 53.3%). The most common reasons for not following the plan were lack of time (n=217, 22.8%), having decided to try a different approach (n=105, 11%), and the COVID-19 pandemic impacted the plan (n=105, 11%). CONCLUSIONS: Patients' initial assessment of their plan as clear, their agreement with the plan, and their initial willingness to follow the plan were all strongly related to their self-reported completion of the plan 3 months later. Patients whose plans involved lifestyle changes were less likely to report that they had "completely" followed their plan. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03385512; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03385512. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR2-10.2196/30431.

Lack of assent to dental examination in children with intellectual disabilities: Dentists' practices in Europe and ethical issues.

AIM: (1) To determine the repartition of criteria which can be considered as marks of lack of assent by the child with intellectual disabilities from the dentist's point of view and whether that influences the decision to examine the patient or not. (2) To explain the decision of practitioners and determine the ethical implications of these practices. METHODS: An anonymous and structured questionnaire was distributed online using the scenario of a 9-year-old child with moderate cognitive impairment with eight different oppositional behaviours. The practitioners were asked about their perception of the patient's lack of assent and about their decision to perform the dental examination or not. RESULTS: The proportion of them who performed a dental examination despite the patient's refusal represented between 13% and 28.8% of the population of respondents. CONCLUSION: There was an ambivalence among the practitioners who carried out a dental consultation when children were uncooperative. They adopted a teleological point of view. It calls for us to reflect on the ethical principles of autonomy and beneficence.

Patient Characteristics Impacting Adherence to Serial Observation for Vestibular Schwannomas.

OBJECTIVE: To examine patient characteristics that impact serial observation adherence among vestibular schwannoma (VS) patients. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. SETTING: Single tertiary care center. METHODS: We selected for VS patients from 201 to 2020 who elected for serial observation as initial management. Patients under 18, with previous management, bilateral or intralabyrinthine VS, and neurofibromatosis type 2 were excluded. Demographics, tumor characteristics, and follow-up status were extracted. Single and multiple logistic regression was used to identify patient characteristics impacting follow-up. RESULTS: We identified 507 VS patients who chose serial observation as initial management. Most were female (56.0%), white (73.0%), and married (72.8%). The mean age was 59.3 and most had private insurance (56.4%). Median Charlson Comorbidity Index was 2.00. Mean pure tone audiometry (PTA) average was 41.7 Hz. Average tumor size was 9.04 mm. Of 507 patients, 358 (70.6%) returned for at least one follow-up. On multiple logistic regression analysis, patients with private insurance (odds ratio [OR]: 0.39, confidence interval [CI]: 0.22-0.68; P = .001), racial minority background (OR: 0.54, CI: 0.35-0.83; P = .005), worse PTA averages (OR: 0.99, CI: 0.98-1.00; P = .044), and older age at diagnosis (OR: 0.97, CI: 0.95-1.00; P = .038) were less likely to follow-up. CONCLUSION: Private health insurance, racial minority background, worse PTA average, and older age were associated with decreased follow-up among adult VS patients electing serial observation. Patients with these characteristics may require additional support to ensure serial observation adherence.

Factors Associated with Patient Adherence to Biofeedback Therapy Referral for Migraine: An Observational Study.

Biofeedback has Grade A evidence for the treatment of migraine, yet few studies have examined the factors associated with patients' decisions to pursue biofeedback treatment recommendations. We sought to examine reasons for adherence or non-adherence to referral to biofeedback therapy as treatment for migraine. Patients with migraine who had been referred for biofeedback by a headache specialist/behavioral neurologist were interviewed in person or via Webex. Patients completed an enrollment questionnaire addressing demographics and questions related to their headache histories. At one month, patients were sent a follow-up questionnaire via REDCap and asked if they had pursued the recommendation for biofeedback therapy, their reasons for their decision, and their impressions about biofeedback for those who pursued it. Nearly two-thirds (65%; 33/51) of patients responded at one month. Of these, fewer than half (45%, 15/33) had contacted biofeedback providers, and only 18% (6/33) completed a biofeedback session. Common themes emerged for patients who did not pursue biofeedback, including feeling that they did not have time, concern for financial obstacles (e.g., treatment cost and/or insurance coverage), and having difficulty scheduling an appointment due to limited provider availability. When asked about their preference between type of biofeedback provider (e.g., a physical therapist or psychologist), qualitative responses were mixed; many patients indicated no preference as long as they took insurance and/or were experienced, while others indicated a specific preference for a physical therapist or psychologist due to familiarity, or prior experiences with that kind of provider. Patients with migraine referred for biofeedback therapy face numerous obstacles to pursuing treatment.

A systematic review on experimental studies about patient adherence to treatment.

A better understanding of patients' adherence to treatment is a prerequisite to maximize the benefit of healthcare provision for patients, reduce treatment costs, and is a key factor in a variety of subsequent health outcomes. We aim to understand the state of the art of scientific evidence about which factors influence patients' adherence to treatment. A systematic literature review was conducted using PRISMA guidelines in five separate electronic databases of scientific publications: PubMed, PsycINFO (ProQuest), Cochrane library (Ovid), Google Scholar, and Web of Science. The search focused on literature reporting the significance of factors in adherence to treatment between 2011 and 2021, including only experimental studies (e.g., randomized controlled trials [RCT], clinical trials, etc.). We included 47 experimental studies. The results of the systematic review (SR) are grouped according to predetermined categories of the World Health Organization (WHO): socioeconomic, treatment, condition, personal, and healthcare-related factors. This review gives an actual overview of evidence-based studies on adherence and analyzed the significance of factors defined by the WHO classification. By showing the strength of certain factors in several independent studies and concomitantly uncovering gaps in research, these insights could serve as a basis for the design of future adherence studies and models.

Development and Testing of an Electronic Diabetes Diary Integrated With a Hospital Information System for Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study.

BACKGROUND: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is one of the leading noncommunicable diseases that require diabetes self-management (DSM) practices. This study proposes to develop a customized mobile health (mHealth) app integrated with a hospital information system (HIS) to enable real-time, two-way transfer of information between the patient and physician. The captured information in the electronic health record will facilitate physicians to have a chronological account of the patient's diabetes history and enable tweaking of the treatment. OBJECTIVE: The objectives of the study are (1) to develop the HIS-integrated Electronic Diabetes Diary (EDDy) per the end-user expectations at a tertiary care hospital in a south Indian state with a high prevalence of T2DM and (2) to evaluate and test adherence to EDDy in the management of T2DM. METHODS: The study will be carried out in 3 phases. Phase 1 involved in-depth interviews with primary end users to gather information regarding their expectations from the hospital-based EDDy. Phase 2 will use this information to develop a customized mHealth app using an iterative model of software development. Phase 3 will involve a pre- and posttest design; the developed app will be tested among consenting patients, where physicians will receive the patients' data through the HIS-integrated mHealth app. The pre- and posttest values will be analyzed for adherence leading to improvement in patients' self-management of blood glucose, user experience, glycemic control, and clinical utility. RESULTS: Phase 1 was completed on November 28, 2023. Phase 2 commenced in December 2023 and will end in May 2025. Phase 3 will follow afterward. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed app will include a convenient and simple alert system that enables the patient to test glucose values at self-selected intervals, provide grading options to enter diabetic-related complications, enhance patients' knowledge of tracking and managing the complications of diabetes, and help in maintaining the visual representation of glucose values and complications. The simplicity and usability of the modules are its novelty, which may motivate the patients to keep track of their glucose values and help them attain better health outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trial Registry India CTRI/2023/03/051077; http://tinyurl.com/4tau4ndb. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/50732.