Increased hip flexion angle and protrusion of the anterior acetabular component can predict symptomatic iliopsoas impingement after total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Iliopsoas impingement (IPI) is a known complication of total hip arthroplasty (THA). The aim of this study was to identify risk factors and the cut-off cup protrusion length for symptomatic IPI. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 218 hips (46 men, 172 women) of 190 consecutive Japanese patients who underwent primary THA at our institution. Hips with IPI (n = 24) and control hips (n = 194) were compared according to age, body mass index, and clinical scores. We evaluated leg-length discrepancy, global offset, implant alignment angles, pelvic inclination, and anterior cup protrusion on plain radiographs and computed tomography scans. RESULTS: Symptomatic IPI had an incidence of 11.0% and a predilection for hips with osteonecrosis. Pre- and postoperative hip flexion angles were significantly greater in hips with symptomatic IPI (p = 0.013 and p = 0.006, respectively). Cup protrusion length was significantly greater in hips with IPI (4.7 mm vs. 1.4 mm; p = 0.001). Receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis identified a threshold cup protrusion length of 3.9 mm (sensitivity 0.89, specificity 0.63) for symptomatic IPI. The incidence of symptomatic IPI tended to be lower in patients with greater posterior pelvic sagittal inclination despite the cup protrusion length being greater. CONCLUSIONS: An increased hip flexion angle and protrusion of the anterior acetabular component predicted symptomatic IPI. The threshold cup protrusion length suggesting mild IPI might be about 3.9 mm and could be useful for identifying candidates for conservative treatment.

Reliability and Validity Analysis of Pelvic Sagittal Inclination Calculated by Inverse Cosine Function Method on Pelvic Anteroposterior Radiographs.

OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of sagittal pelvic tilt is significant for hip surgeons. However, the accurate measurement of pelvic sagittal inclination (PSI) is still a challenge. The objective of this study is to propose a new method for measurement of PSI from pelvic anteroposterior radiograph based on the inverse cosine function obtained from individualized pelvic model. METHODS: Collecting the imaging data of 30 patients with both pelvic CT and full-length spine radiographs. Establishing pelvic model by customized 3D reconstruction software. The length of three groups of longitudinal and transverse line segments (A'p and B') were measured from full-length spine anteroposterior radiographs. The corresponding anatomical parameters, including A, B, b, ∠α, ∠γ, were measured and calculated on the same patient's pelvic model. The estimated PSI (ePSI) based on three groups of anatomical landmarks, including ePSI-1, ePSI-2, and ePSI-3, were calculated by equation, ePSI = arccos A ' p b * B ' - ∠ α , and compared with the actual PSI (aPSI) measured by Surgamap software. For the reliability and validation evaluation, three observers measured these parameters in two rounds. Intra-class correlation and inter-class correlation were both calculated. Bland-Altman method was used to evaluate the consistency between the estimated PSI (ePSI) and the actual PSI (aPSI). RESULTS: ePSI-1 and ePSI-2 showed excellent intra-observer reliability (0.921-0.997, p < 0.001) and inter-observer reliability (0.801-0.977, p < 0.001). ePSI-3 had a fair inter-observer reliability (0.239-0.823, p < 0.001). ePSI-1 showed the strongest correlation with aPSI (r = 0.917, p < 0.001). Mean (maximum) absolute difference of ePSI-1, ePSI-2, and ePSI-3 is 2.62° (7.42°), 4.23° (13.78°), and 7.74° (31.47°), respectively. The proportion of cases with absolute difference less than 5° in three groups were 86.7% (ePSI-1), 66.7% (ePSI-2), 56.7% (ePSI-3). CONCLUSION: This new method based on inverse cosine function has good reliability and validity when used in the evaluation of PSI on pelvic anteroposterior radiographs.

The effect of pelvic tilt on three-dimensional coverage of the femoral head: A computational simulation study using patient-specific anatomy.

Improved understanding of how three-dimensional (3D) femoral head coverage changes as the pelvic sagittal inclination (PSI) is altered would advance clinical diagnosis of hip pathoanatomy. Herein, we applied computer modeling of 3D computed tomography reconstructions of the pelvis and proximal femur to quantify relationships between the PSI and regional 3D femoral head coverage. Eleven healthy, young adult participants with typically developed hip anatomy were analyzed. The orientation of the pelvis was altered to define a PSI of -30° to 30° at 1° increments. Hip adduction and rotation were fixed in a standing position, which was measured by direct in vivo imaging of the pelvis and femur bones using dual fluoroscopy. Femoral head coverage was quantified in the anterior, superior, posterior, and inferior regions for each PSI position. Change in coverage was largest in the anterior region (29.8%) and smallest in the superior region (6.5%). Coverage increased linearly in the anterior region as the PSI increased, while a linear decrease was found in the posterior region and the inferior region (all p < .001). The slopes of the regression line for these regions were 0.513, -0.316, and -0.255, respectively. For the superior region, coverage increased when the PSI was altered from -30° to 5° and decreased when the PSI was larger than 5°. Overall, a 1° increase in PSI resulted in an increase of 0.5% in anterior coverage and a decrease of 0.3% in posterior coverage. Our findings provide baseline data that improve understanding of the effect of PSI on femoral coverage.

Posterior Pelvic Tilt From Supine to Standing in Patients With Symptomatic Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip.

Pelvic sagittal inclination (PSI) significantly affects the femoral head coverage by the acetabulum in patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH), while no reports have quantified PSI in DDH patients in the supine and standing positions. Furthermore, little is known about how PSI changes after periacetabular osteotomies. Herein, PSI in the supine and standing positions was quantified in DDH patients preoperatively and postoperatively. Twenty-five patients with DDH who had undergone periacetabular osteotomies were analyzed. The preoperative PSI and the PSI 2 years after surgery were measured in the supine and standing positions using the image registration technique between radiographs and computed tomographic images. The percentage of patients who showed PSI changes of more than 10° from the supine to the standing position was quantified. PSI changed 8.2 ± 5.0° posteriorly from the supine to the standing position during the preoperative period. Posterior pelvic tilt of more than 10° was found in nine cases (36%). Two years after periacetabular osteotomies, the postural PSI change was 7.1 ± 3.9° posteriorly. When the preoperative and postoperative PSI values were compared, PSI in the standing position did not differ (p = 0.20). Similarly, the amount of PSI change from the supine to standing position was not significantly different (p = 0.26). In conclusion, posterior pelvic tilt in the standing position was found preoperatively in symptomatic DDH patients, and it remained for 2 years after periacetabular osteotomies. This postural change in PSI does not seem to influence the outcome of periacetabular osteotomy. However, during preoperative planning, surgeons should recognize that acetabular anteversion or anterior acetabular coverage differs between the supine and standing positions in some patients with DDH. © 2019 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 38:578-587, 2020.

Change in Pelvic Sagittal Inclination From Supine to Standing Position Before Hip Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Cup anteversion and inclination are important for avoiding implant impingement and dislocation in total hip arthroplasty. However, functional cup anteversion and cup inclination also change as the pelvic sagittal inclination (PSI) changes. Therefore, PSI in both supine and standing positions was measured in a large cohort in this study. METHODS: A total of 422 patients (median age, 61; range, 15-87) who underwent total hip arthroplasty were the subjects of this study. There were 83 patients with primary osteoarthritis (OA), 274 patients with developmental dysplasia-derived secondary OA, 48 patients with osteonecrosis, and 17 patients with rapidly destructive coxopathy (RDC). Preoperative PSI in supine and standing positions was measured by automated computed topography segmentation and landmark localization of the pelvis followed by intensity-based 2D-3D registration, and the number of cases in which PSI changed more than 10° posteriorly was calculated. Hip disease, sex, and age were analyzed if they were related to a PSI change of more than 10°. RESULTS: The median PSI was 5.1° (interquartile range, 0.4°-9.4°) in supine and -1.3° (interquartile range, -6.5° to 4.2°) in standing position. There were 79 cases (19%) in which the PSI changed more than 10° posteriorly from supine to standing. Elder age and patients with primary OA and RDC were revealed to be the related factors. CONCLUSION: PSI changed more than 10° posteriorly from supine to standing in 19% of cases. Age and diagnosis of primary OA and RDC were the significant factors for the posterior rotation.

Does Pelvic Sagittal Inclination in the Supine and Standing Positions Change Over 10 Years of Follow-Up After Total Hip Arthroplasty?

BACKGROUND: Functional anteversion and inclination of the cup change as the pelvic sagittal inclination (PSI) changes. The purposes of this study were to investigate the chronological changes of PSI during a 10-year follow-up period after total hip arthroplasty (THA) and to report the characteristics of patients who showed a greater than 10° change in the PSI from the supine to the standing position. METHODS: The subjects were 70 patients who were followed up for 10 years after THA. PSI values in the supine and standing positions were measured by 2D-3D matching using computed tomography images and pelvic radiographs. PSI values before THA and 1, 5, and 10 years after THA were compared in both the supine and standing positions. RESULTS: Supine PSI showed less than 5° of change, whereas standing PSI showed a significant decrease with time over the 10-year period. Although 43% of patients with less than 10° of difference in the PSI between the supine and standing positions before THA increased PSI posteriorly (reclining) more than 10° in standing from the supine position at 10 years, no late dislocation was observed. CONCLUSION: Supine PSI showed no significant change, but standing PSI showed a significant increase posteriorly with time over a 10-year period. However, this PSI change did not reach the level that it caused negative consequences such as late dislocation. The pelvic position in the supine position might still be a good functional reference position of the pelvis for aiming to achieve proper cup alignment at 10 years.

Spinal factors influencing change in pelvic sagittal inclination from supine position to standing position in patients before total hip arthroplasty.

In some atypical patients, pelvic sagittal inclination (PSI) changes posteriorly by >10° from supine to standing position before total hip arthroplasty (THA). Several studies have suggested PSI in standing position is related to lumbar degeneration. The purpose of this study was to investigate spinal factors influencing changes in PSI from supine to standing position before THA. Participants comprised 163 consecutive patients who had undergone THA. Presence of compression fractures, presence of lumbar spondylolisthesis, thoracic kyphosis angle, lumbar lordosis angle, S1 anterior tilt angle and T4 plumb line position were investigated as spinal factors. Presence of compression fractures, age, presence of lumbar spondylolisthesis and small S1 anterior tilt angle were independently associated with posterior change in PSI from supine to standing position in patients before THA.