ABSTRACT
Natural products have proven to be an immeasurable source of bioactive compounds. The exceptional biodiversity encountered in Amazonia, alongside a rich entomofauna and frequent interactions with various herbivores is the crucible of a promising chemodiversity. This prompted us to search for novel botanical insecticides in French Guiana. As this French overseas department faces severe issues linked to insects, notably the strong incidence of vector-borne infectious diseases, we decided to focus our research on products able to control the mosquito Aedes aegypti. We tested 452 extracts obtained from 85 species originating from 36 botanical families and collected in contrasted environments against an Ae. aegypti laboratory strain susceptible to all insecticides, and a natural population resistant to both pyrethroid and organophosphate insecticides collected in Cayenne for the most active of them. Eight species (Maytenus oblongata Reissek, Celastraceae; Costus erythrothyrsus Loes., Costaceae; Humiria balsamifera Aubl., Humiriaceae; Sextonia rubra (Mez) van der Werff, Lauraceae; Piper hispidum Sw., Piperaceae; Laetia procera (Poepp.) Eichl., Salicaceae; Matayba arborescens (Aubl.) Radlk., Sapindaceae; and Cupania scrobitulata Rich., Sapindaceae) led to extracts exhibiting more than 50% larval mortality after 48 h of exposition at 100 µg/mL against the natural population and were considered active. Selectivity and phytochemistry of these extracts were therefore investigated and discussed, and some active compounds highlighted. Multivariate analysis highlighted that solvents, plant tissues, plant family and location had a significant effect on mortality while light, available resources and vegetation type did not. Through this case study we highlighted that plant defensive chemistry mechanisms are crucial while searching for novel insecticidal products.
Subject(s)
Aedes , Insecticides/pharmacology , Plant Extracts/pharmacology , Animals , French Guiana , Larva/drug effects , Mosquito ControlABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Previous studies showed that floods can lead to diarrheal diseases outbreaks; however, the short-term effects of different severity floods on diarrheal diseases are not clear. This study aims to examine 0-14â¯days lagged effects of moderate and severe floods on diarrhea in Anhui Province, one heavily flood-prone area in China. METHODS: Daily diarrheal cases from January 1, 2013 to August 31, 2017 in 16 cities of Anhui were extracted from the National Notifiable Disease Surveillance System. Meteorological data were obtained, and moderate or severe floods were identified according to Comprehensive Study Group of Major Natural Disasters of the State Science and Technology Commission in China. The quasi-Poisson generalized linear models were applied to evaluate effects of floods on daily diarrheal cases in each city with 0-14â¯days lag, and we divided post-flood periods into week 1 and week 2, further conducted provincial-level meta-analysis. RESULTS: Immediate effects of floods on diarrheal diseases were observed within 7â¯days, and at provincial level moderate floods had a RR of 1.05 (95% CI: 1.02-1.09) and severe floods RRâ¯=â¯1.04 (95% CI: 1.01-1.08) controlling for population size, temperature and relative humidity etc., but less effects appeared in the second week. Impacts of flooding on diarrheal diseases varied among cities. Moderate floods in week 1 had a RR of 1.51 (95% CI: 1.29-1.78) in Bozhou, and severe floods had a RRâ¯=â¯1.31 (95% CI: 1.05-1.64) in Chuzhou. The severe floods may have higher RR in week 1 compared with moderate floods in Anqing (1.10 vs 1.06), Chuzhou (1.31 vs 1.07) and Luan (1.18 vs 1.00). CONCLUSIONS: Both moderate and severe floods can significantly increase diarrheal risks in one week with regionally varied effects, and severe floods may lead higher risks. The findings have implications for preparing emergent interventions in hazard periods to reduce health risks of floods.