Ethical Considerations for Identifying Individuals in the Prodromal/Early Phase of Parkinson's Disease: A Narrative Review.

The ability to identify individuals in the prodromal phase of Parkinson's disease has improved in recent years, raising the question of whether and how those affected should be informed about the risk of future disease. Several studies investigated prognostic counselling for individuals with isolated REM sleep behavior disorder and have shown that most patients want to receive information about prognosis, but autonomy and individual preferences must be respected. However, there are still many unanswered questions about risk disclosure or early diagnosis of PD, including the impact on personal circumstances, cultural preferences and specific challenges associated with different profiles of prodromal symptoms, genetic testing or biomarker assessments. This narrative review aims to summarize the current literature on prognostic counselling and risk disclosure in PD, as well as highlight future perspectives that may emerge with the development of new biomarkers and their anticipated impact on the definition of PD.

An important goal of Parkinson's disease research is to diagnose the disease at an earlier stage, even before the typical motor symptoms appear, in the so-called 'prodromal phase'. Currently, there are no treatments available that can slow down or prevent disease progression in this early phase, even though many of the early symptoms are treatable. This raises ethical questions about whether people want to know their future risk of Parkinson's and, if so, how this information should be given. This article summarizes the current state of knowledge, but also open questions about risk disclosure in the prodromal phase of Parkinson's. Previous studies have shown that many people with early symptoms of Parkinson's would like to know their risk, but that the individual's wish to know (or not to know) must first be ascertained and respected. Future studies need to find out whether very early diagnosis of Parkinson's might have an impact on people affected, for example in terms of psychological stress or anxiety, and whether cultural background might influence attitudes to risk disclosure. Furthermore, it is expected that in the future it will be possible to make an early diagnosis of Parkinson's using specific new techniques, e.g., by testing spinal fluid. It is of utmost importance to find out if and how test results of these new techniques should be communicated to patients, even if they do not lead to direct medical treatment.

How hereditary cancer risk disclosure to relatives is handled in practice - Patient perspectives from a Swedish cancer genetics clinic.

OBJECTIVES: Hereditary cancer risks can be effectively managed if at-risk relatives enroll in surveillance and preventive care. Family-mediated risk disclosure has internationally been shown to be incomplete, selective and leave over a third of eligible at-risk individuals without access to genetic counseling. We explored patients handling of cancer risk information in practice. METHODS: We conducted twelve semi-structured interviews with patients who had completed their genetic counseling and been asked to disclose risk information to relatives. Questions were designed to investigate lived experiences of communicating hereditary risk and focused on disclosure strategies, intrafamilial interactions and emotional responses. RESULTS: Qualitative content analysis yielded five categories. These span personal fears, shared responsibilities, feeling of empowerment, innovative solutions and unmet needs. Patients put high value on collaboration with their genetic healthcare professionals but also solicited better overview of the counseling process and more personalized, case-tailored information. CONCLUSIONS: Our results add novel insights about the practical strategies employed by genetic counselees and their motivations behind disclosing hereditary risk information to relatives. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: A patient-centered cancer genetics care would clarify roles and responsibilities around risk disclosure, inform counselees about the process upfront and tailor information to offer case-specific data with the family's inheritance pattern explained.

A study on the factors influencing the intention to receive booster shots of the COVID-19 vaccine in China based on the information frame effect.

Introduction: In the response to and prevention and control of the Novel coronavirus pneumonia, the COVID-19 vaccine does not provide lifelong immunity, and it is therefore important to increase the rate of booster shots of the COVID-19 vaccine. In the field of information health science, research has found that information frames have an impact in changing individual attitudes and health behaviors. Objective: This study focuses on the effects of different influencing factors on the public's willingness to receive the booster shots of the COVID-19 vaccine under two information frameworks. Methods: An online questionnaire was conducted to explore the effects of demographic characteristics, personal awareness, social relationships, risk disclosure, perceived booster vaccination protection rate, and duration of protection under the assumption of an information framework. T test and one-way analysis were used to testing the effect of variables. Results: (1) The persuasion effect under the gain frame is higher than that under the loss frame (B = 0.863 vs. B = 0.746); (2) There was no significant difference in subjects' intention of booster vaccination in terms of gender, age, income, occupation, educational background and place of residence. Whether family members received booster vaccination was strongly correlated with their intention of vaccination under the loss framework (p = 0.017, M = 4.63, SD = 0.664). (3) The higher the understanding of COVID-19, the higher the degree of compliance with the government's COVID-19 prevention and control measures, and the higher the willingness to strengthen vaccination; (4) Risk disclosure has a significant impact on people's willingness to receive COVID-19 booster shots (M = 2.48, under the loss framework; M = 2.44, under the gain framework); (5) Vaccine protection rate and duration of protection have an impact on people's willingness to vaccinate. Increased willingness to vaccinate when the protection rate of booster vaccine approaches 90% (M = 4.76, under the loss framework; M = 4.68, under the gain framework). When the vaccine protection period is 2 years, people are more willing to receive a booster vaccine; and the willingness to receive a booster shot is stronger under the loss framework (M = 4.60, SD = 0.721, p = 0.879). Conclusion: The impact of the information framework on COVID-19 vaccination intentions is different, and the disclosure of relevant health information should focus on the impact of the information framework and content on the public's behavior toward strengthening vaccination. Therefore, in the face of public health emergencies, public health departments, healthcare institutions, and other sectors can consider adopting the Gainful Information Framework tool to disseminate health information to achieve better persuasion and promote public health behavior change enhancing public health awareness, and promoting universal vaccination.

Persistence of inadequate consent training for interns.

BACKGROUND: Informed consent is a continuous process of communication with the patient and not merely the signing of a form. The Irish Medical Council's Guide to Good Practice and Ethics state that no part of the consent process should be delegated to an intern unless the procedure is a minor with which the intern is very familiar and all relevant information has first been explained to the intern. AIMS: We aimed to evaluate whether practices regarding interns and consent had changed in the past five years. METHODS: An anonymous Google Forms survey was distributed to interns from all intern networks between 24-August and 26-November 2021. RESULTS: Of 854 interns, there were 147(17.2%) survey responses. 129(87.8%) participants had consented for a procedure. 111(86%) responded that they had consented for procedures that they had not witnessed before. 92(71.3%) reported that their medical supervisor did not explain procedures to them prior to obtaining consent. 128(99.2%) of interns were not usually observed by a more senior doctor when obtaining consent. 116(89.9%) were expected to obtain consent from patients on a regular basis, with 78(60.5%) feeling pressured into doing so on at least one occasion. Results were largely unchanged compared to when the same survey was circulated in 2016. CONCLUSIONS: Interns remain routinely involved in the consent process without adequate training or supervision. This is unfair on our most junior doctors and on patients. Steps must be taken to ensure the IMC guidance is adhered to and this deficiency must be highlighted to Senior Clinicians.

Do level, field, and place of board members' Education impact financial risk disclosure? A Saudi Empirical evidence.

This study aims to investigate the effect of board attributes (level, field, and place of education) on corporate financial risk disclosure in the Saudi energy sector. The research focuses on four energy companies listed between 2009 and 2021, resulting in 52 firm-year observations. Panel regressions were implemented to control for heteroscedasticity and autocorrelation. The study's results revealed that education level positively influences financial risk disclosure, whereas the impacts of place and field of education are not well-established. Moreover, the study explored the moderating role of education attributes in financial risk disclosure, indicating that companies with fewer highly educated board members who received their education from foreign universities other than those in Saudi Arabia are more inclined to disclose financial risks transparently. These findings suggest an essential need to diversify the level and place of education among directors, which holds significant implications for corporate governance policy-makers.

Direct letters to relatives at risk of hereditary cancer-study protocol for a multi-center randomized controlled trial of healthcare-assisted versus family-mediated risk disclosure at Swedish cancer genetics clinics (DIRECT-study).

BACKGROUND: The results of germline genetic testing for hereditary cancer are of importance not only to the patients under investigation but also to their genetic at-risk relatives. Standard care is to encourage the proband (first family member under investigation) to pass on this risk information to the relatives. Previous research suggests that with family-mediated disclosure, only about a third of at-risk relatives contact health care to receive genetic counselling. In some studies, complementing family-mediated risk disclosure with healthcare-assisted risk disclosure almost doubles the uptake of genetic counselling in at-risk relatives. In this study, we evaluate healthcare-assisted direct letters to relatives at risk of hereditary cancer syndromes in a randomized controlled trial. METHODS: Probands are recruited from Swedish outpatient cancer genetics clinics to this two-arm randomized controlled trial. The study recruits probands with either a pathogenic variant in a cancer susceptibility gene (BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2) or probands with familial breast and colorectal cancer based on clinical and pedigree criteria. In both arms, probands receive standard care, i.e., are encouraged and supported to pass on information to relatives. In the intervention arm, the proband is also offered to have direct letters sent to the at-risk relatives. The primary outcome measure is the proportion of at-risk relatives contacting a Swedish cancer genetics clinic within 12 months of the proband receiving the test results. DISCUSSION: This paper describes the protocol of a randomized controlled clinical trial evaluating a healthcare-assisted approach to risk disclosure by offering the probands to send direct letters to their at-risk relatives. The results of this study should be informative in the future development of risk disclosure practices in cancer genetics clinics. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov. Identifier NCT04197856 (pre-trial registration on December 13, 2019). Also registered at the website "RCC Cancerstudier i Sverige" as study #86719.

To know or not to know? Opinions of patients with Parkinson's Disease on disclosing risk of phenoconversion in RBD.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of our study was to find out the opinion of patients with Parkinson's Disease (PD) whose disease was preceded by REM sleep behaviour disorder (RBD) regarding early information about the high risk of phenoconversion in RBD. CLINICAL RATIONALE FOR THE STUDY: RBD is an early clinical manifestation of α-synucleinopathies with a more than 90% risk of phenoconversion to PD, dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) or multiple system atrophy (MSA). It remains a subject for debate as to whether and how RBD patients should be informed about the high risk of phenoconversion. The patient's right to full knowledge regarding his or her health conflicts with the potentially destructive impact of this information on his or her mental state and quality of life of them and their relatives. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty-nine patients with PD whose disease was preceded by RBD were surveyed. Data on the course of RBD and PD was collected. Questions were asked about early information about the high risk of phenoconversion to patients with RBD and factors determining the opinion of the surveyed persons. RESULTS: The majority ( > 60%) of respondents gave a positive answer when asked whether patients should be informed about their high risk of developing PD once diagnosed with RBD. Only a few (7.7%) respondents believed that disclosing such information to the patient should be possible only after obtaining his or her consent. Respondents associated consent to information about the high risk of developing PD in people with RBD with high expectations of the healthcare system. We were unable to determine whether factors such as the gender of the subject, the clinical course of the PD, and the RBD duration had an impact on patients' opinions regarding disclosing knowledge about phenoconversion. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Our study provides important information that should influence physicians' communication with patients with RBD, especially regarding how they communicate about the high risk of phenoconversion.

Impact of providing genetics-based future cardiovascular risk on LDL-C in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia.

BACKGROUND: Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is an autosomal dominant monogenic disease characterized by high low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels. Although carrying causative FH variants is associated with coronary heart disease (CHD), it remains unclear whether disclosing its associated cardiovascular risk affects outcomes in patients with FH. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of providing future cardiovascular risk based on genetic testing in addition to a standard FH education program. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, wait-list controlled, open-label, single-center trial. In the intervention group, we reported a future cardiovascular risk based on the genetic testing adding to standard FH education at week 0. In the wait-list control group, we only disseminated standard FH education according to the guidelines at week 0; they later received a genetic testing-based cardiovascular risk assessment at week 24. The primary endpoint of this study was the plasma LDL-C level at week 24. RESULTS: Fifty eligible patients with clinically diagnosed FH, without a history of CHD, were allocated to the intervention group (n = 24) or the wait-list control group (n = 26). At week 24, the intervention group had a significantly greater reduction in LDL-C levels than the wait-list control group (mean changes, -13.1 mg/dL vs. 6.6 mg/dL; difference, -19.7 mg/dL; 95% confidence interval, -34 to -5.6; p = 0.009). This interventional effect was consistent with FH causative variant carriers but not with non-carriers. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to standard FH care, providing future cardiovascular risk based on genetic testing can further reduce plasma LDL-C levels, particularly among FH causal variant carriers. REGISTRATION: Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCTs04218002). URL: https://jrct.niph.go.jp/latest-detail/jRCTs042180027.

The Views of Patients with Isolated Rapid Eye Movement Sleep Behavior Disorder on Risk Disclosure.

BACKGROUND: Isolated rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder (iRBD) is associated with an increased risk of Parkinson's disease and other synucleinopathies. There is no consensus about disclosure of this risk to patients with iRBD. OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to assess the experiences of risk disclosure in a group of patients with iRBD and their views on what, when, and how this should be done. METHODS: A survey was administered to patients with iRBD to explore their experiences and views on risk disclosure. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients with iRBD (28 males; mean age, 70 [SD 8.7] years; mean disease duration, 8.7 [SD 6.4] years) were included. A third reported they had not been informed about the link between iRBD and other conditions by clinicians at diagnosis, but 90% would have liked to have received prognostic information, and 60% indicated that this should happen at the point that iRBD was diagnosed. Most participants wanted this information to come from the clinician diagnosing and treating iRBD (90.3%). Almost three-quarters (72.2%) had searched for this information online. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with iRBD mostly wished to have received information regarding the potential implications of iRBD when the diagnosis was made. © 2023 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Does CSR governance matters for corporate value creation: exploring the nexus between corporate sustainability governance and investment efficiency of acquirers in Pakistan.

This study examines the potential effects of corporate sustainability governance on the investment efficiency of asset acquirers. Using secondary data gathered from the annual reports of sample firms and the global reporting initiatives data repository from 1991-2021, the study results indicate that the provision of sustainable governance better facilitates the efficient allocation of capital and acquirer's value creation. Subject to the individual effects, we find that the economic sustainability disclosure, social sustainability disclosure, and environmental sustainability disclosure have positive and significant effect on the investment efficiency of acquirers that increases the competitiveness of a company's investment. Outcomes further revealed that market risk disclosure and shareholder activism have a strong moderating impact on the relationship between sustainability governance and acquirers efficiency, which significantly complements the acquirer's value. The study findings put forward policy directions that the enforcement of persistent sustainability governance practices has more potential to maximize acquirer's investment.

Risk disclosure in prodromal Parkinson's disease - A survey of neurologists.

INTRODUCTION: In the absence of a disease-modifying treatment and prognostic uncertainty, ethics of risk disclosure in prodromal Parkinson's disease (PD) is challenging. Previous studies highlighted several facets of these challenges from the perspective of involved parties. However, to date, the view of neurologists who may encounter individuals with prodromal PD remained unrepresented. Moreover, cross-cultural differences intrinsic to the ethics of risk disclosure are yet to be elucidated. Therefore, we investigated the attitude of neurologists toward risk disclosure in prodromal PD. METHODS: In this observational study, Turkish neurologists were invited to fill out a questionnaire evaluating their stance on risk disclosure regarding an individual with polysomnography-confirmed REM sleep behavior disorder, which is the strongest risk factor for PD. RESULTS: More than 90% of the participating 222 neurologists were familiar with prodromal PD. While 15.3% stated that the risk should be disclosed in any case, 6.8% chose no disclosure. The remaining 77.9% favored disclosure only under certain circumstances, the plurality of which was the individual's consent to know about the risk. After reminding the potential neuroprotective effects of exercise and diet, neurologists who chose the option of "no disclosure" decreased to 3.2% (McNemar's test p = 0.008). No significant differences among the neurologists were found regarding sex, academic title, or field of interest. CONCLUSION: The majority of the neurologists found it appropriate to disclose the risk of future PD only if the individual expresses a desire to know. Also, recognition of the impact of lifestyle factors on PD is important in prognostic counseling.

Cross-influence of information and risk effects on the IPO market: exploring risk disclosure with a machine learning approach.

The paper examines whether the structure of the risk factor disclosure in an IPO prospectus helps explain the cross-section of first-day returns in a sample of Chinese initial public offerings. This paper analyzes the semantics and content of risk disclosure based on an unsupervised machine learning algorithm. From both long-term and short-term perspectives, this paper explores how the information effect and risk effect of risk disclosure play their respective roles. The results show that risk disclosure has a stronger risk effect at the semantic novelty level and a more substantial information effect at the risk content level. A novel aspect of the paper lies in the use of text analysis (semantic novelty and content richness) to characterize the structure of the risk factor disclosure. The study shows that initial IPO returns negatively correlate with semantic novelty and content richness. We show the interaction between risk effect and information effect on risk disclosure under the nature of the same stock plate. When enterprise information transparency is low, the impact of semantic novelty and content richness on the IPO market is respectively enhanced.

Racial Differences in Trust and Risk Disclosure Preferences Among Older Registered Research Volunteers Screened for Prodromal Synucleinopathies.

Background/Objectives: The equitable enrollment of minority participants in synucleinopathy trials is an emerging public health concern. Differing views regarding risk disclosure may influence research involvement in at-risk adults. Methods: We conducted a brief mailed survey, including questions about trust and hypothetical risk disclosure preferences, to 100 participants in the Healthier Black Elders Center cohort in Detroit, MI and 100 participants in the Claude D. Pepper Older Americans Independence Center Research Participant Program at the University of Michigan. Results: 125 recipients without a diagnosis of a neurodegenerative disorder returned the survey, 52 (41.6%) of whom identified as being Black or African American. Black respondents reported less trust in medical providers (t=2.02, p=0.045) and medical researchers (t=2.52, p=0.013) and a greater desire to be informed about the presence of unchangeable risk factors for neurodegenerative disorders (t=2.02, p=0.045). Conclusions: These findings have implications for the recruitment of representative populations in prodromal neurodegenerative research.

Professional Responsibility: Conceptual Rescue and Plea for Reform.

For as long as knowledge asymmetry continues to be deemed the defining characteristic of the lay-professional relationship, the courts' delineation of obligations meant to address lay vulnerability will too frequently end up compounding the layperson's non-epistemic, 'sense of self' vulnerability. The proposed re-conceptualisation of professional responsibility calls for reform on several fronts: among these, an expanded 'duty to consult' (beyond do-not-resuscitate-orders) is uniquely placed as a justiciable criterion capable of addressing such a situational, 'sense of self' vulnerability.

Assessing and disclosing test results for 'mild cognitive impairment': the perspective of old age psychiatrists in Scotland.

BACKGROUND: Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is a condition that exists between normal healthy ageing and dementia with an uncertain aetiology and prognosis. This uncertainty creates a complex dynamic between the clinicians' conception of MCI, what is communicated to the individual about their condition, and how the individual responds to the information conveyed to them. The aim of this study was to explore clinicians' views around the assessment and communication of MCI in memory clinics. METHOD: As part of a larger longitudinal study looking at patients' adjustment to MCI disclosure, we interviewed Old Age Psychiatrists at the five participating sites across Scotland. The study obtained ethics approvals and the interviews (carried out between Nov 2020-Jan 2021) followed a semi-structured schedule focusing on [1] how likely clinicians are to use the term MCI with patients; [2] what tests clinicians rely on and how much utility they see in them; and [3] how clinicians communicate risk of progression to dementia. The interviews were voice recorded and were analysed using reflective thematic analysis. RESULTS: Initial results show that most clinicians interviewed (Total N = 19) considered MCI to have significant limitations as a diagnostic term. Nevertheless, most clinicians reported using the term MCI (n = 15/19). Clinical history was commonly described as the primary aid in the diagnostic process and also to rule out functional impairment (which was sometimes corroborated by Occupational Therapy assessment). All clinicians reported using the Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination-III as a primary assessment tool. Neuroimaging was frequently found to have minimal usefulness due to the neuroradiological reports being non-specific. CONCLUSION: Our study revealed a mixture of approaches to assessing and disclosing test results for MCI. Some clinicians consider the condition as a separate entity among neurodegenerative disorders whereas others find the term unhelpful due to its uncertain prognosis. Clinicians report a lack of specific and sensitive assessment methods for identifying the aetiology of MCI in clinical practice. Our study demonstrates a broad range of views and therefore variability in MCI risk disclosure in memory assessment services which may impact the management of individuals with MCI.

Information Framing Effect on Public's Intention to Receive the COVID-19 Vaccination in China.

The aims of the study were (1) to explore information framing effect on the public's intention to receive the COVID-19 vaccination and (2) to understand the key factors influencing the intention of COVID-19 vaccinations in China. An online questionnaire survey was conducted to explore the influence of demographic characteristics, individual awareness, social relationship, risk disclosure, perceived vaccine efficacy, and protection duration under the assumptions of information framing. The results showed that (1) the persuasion effect under loss frame was higher than that under gain frame (B = 0.616 vs. 0.552); (2) there was no significant difference between sex, age, income, occupation, educational background and residence for the participants' intention to be vaccinated; whether family members/friends were vaccinated had a strong correlation with their vaccination intention under the gain frame; (3) the higher the understanding of COVID-19 and the compliance with government COVID-19 prevention and control measures were, the higher the vaccination intention was; (4) risk disclosure had the greatest impact on people's COVID-19 vaccination intention; (5) perceived vaccine effectiveness and duration of protection had little effect on people's intention to receive vaccination. The influence of information framing on the intention of COVID-19 vaccination is different. The publicity of relevant health information should pay attention to the influence of information framing and contents on the behavior of public vaccination, so as to enhance public health awareness and promote the vaccination of the whole population.

Risk Disclosure in Prodromal Parkinson's Disease.

BACKGROUND: Impressive progress in the understanding of the prodromal phase of Parkinson's disease (PD) in recent years has enabled the generation of disease prediction models. However, a remaining diagnostic uncertainty and lack of therapeutic options for affected individuals has resulted in a variety of ethical issues that have not to date been addressed sufficiently. Moreover, differences in the specificity of prodromal symptoms and possible subtypes of PD, especially the presence of rapid eye movement (REM) sleep behavior disorder (RBD), may have an important impact on prognostic counseling. OBJECTIVES: To derive a guideline for risk disclosure in prodromal PD based on the current literature and expert opinion. METHODS: We performed (1) a literature review on prognostic counseling in PD and (2) consulted with international experts on prodromal PD using a semi-structured questionnaire based on a Delphi approach to evaluate recommendations for risk disclosure in PD. RESULTS: The literature research revealed only 11 publications addressing prognostic counseling, with only two studies directly addressing affected individuals and most studies focusing on risk disclosure in RBD. The expert survey revealed the importance of distinguishing between individuals with and without RBD in prognostic counseling. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the current literature and expert recommendations, a guideline for risk disclosure in prodromal PD for clinical care and research could be elaborated. Prognostic counseling should include differentiation between individuals with and without RBD, taking into account the high uncertainty of risk calculation in RBD-negative prodromal PD. © 2021 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Self-help behaviors partially mediate the relationship between personalized depression risk disclosure and psychological distress: A mediation analysis using data from a randomized controlled trial.

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is one of the most prevalent forms of mental illness. Multivariate risk predictive (MVRP) algorithms provide a new means of identifying high-risk individuals for mental health disorders. Self-help behaviors may provide accessible methods to mitigate depression risk. The objective of this study is to investigate the mediating effects of self-help behavior on the relationship between depression risk disclosure and psychological distress. A sample (n = 556) of high-risk Canadians for a major depressive episode (MDE) were randomized into risk-disclosure or control groups and followed-up at 6 and 12 months. Mediation analysis using repeated measure mixed effects models was used to investigate the mediating effects of self-help behaviors on the relationship between depression risk disclosure and psychological distress over time. Self-help behavior was found to partially mediate the relationship between risk disclosure and psychological distress at month 12. Both unadjusted and adjusted associations were found to be negative and significant (ßunadj = -0.16 [-0.30, -0.03]) (ßadj = -0.15[-0.29, -0.02]). Self-help plays a partial mediating role in the relationship between depression risk disclosure and psychological distress over time. More research is required in this field to increase knowledge about the role of self-help in mental health treatment.