Sparing confirmatory testing in primary aldosteronism (SCIPA): a multicenter retrospective diagnostic accuracy study.

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of primary aldosteronism (PA) is comprehensive, which includes case-detection testing, case confirmation followed by subtype classification. In certain instances, such as in the setting of spontaneous hypokalemia, suppressed renin activity (PRA) plus plasma aldosterone concentration (PAC) of > 15 ng/dL, one may not proceed with confirmatory tests. However, the quality of evidence behind this approach is very low. This study sought to evaluate the proposed "simplified confirmatory pathway" that can spare confirmatory testing for primary aldosteronism by evaluating the diagnostic performances of the various pre-specified PAC thresholds in combination with findings of suppressed renin and spontaneous hypokalemia. METHODS: This is a multi-center, retrospective diagnostic accuracy cohort-selected cross-sectional study. A total of 133 participants aged 18 years and above underwent saline infusion test between January 2010 to March 2024. The outcome measures comprise of the diagnostic performances of the different index test combinations (baseline PAC, baseline PRA and presence of spontaneous hypokalemia): sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, positive predictive value, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic accuracy. Data analysis was performed using SPSS 29.0.1.0 & MedCalc 20.218. RESULTS: Of the 133 patients who underwent saline infusion test, 88 (66.17%) were diagnosed with PA. A PAC of > 25 ng/dL plus PRA < 1.0 ng/dL/hr with spontaneous hypokalemia showed the highest specificity at 100% (95% CI 90.51%, 100.00%) and positive predictive value at 100% (85.18 - 100.00%). The minimum acceptable combination criteria were determined to be a PAC of > 20 ng/dL plus PRA < 0.6 ng/dL/hr, and presence of spontaneous hypokalemia. It has high specificity (94.59%; 95% CI 81.81%, 99.34%), positive predictive value (93.55%, 95% CI 78.49%, 98.29%), and moderate positive likelihood ratio (LR+) (6.39, 95% CI 1.61, 25.38) CONCLUSION: A hypertensive patient with spontaneous hypokalemia and screening findings of PAC > 20 ng/dL and suppressed PRA of < 0.6 ng/ml/hr, may be classified as "overt primary aldosteronism confirmed" and may not need to proceed with dynamic confirmatory testing. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION NUMBER: SRCTN34186253.

Comparison of four confirmatory tests for the diagnosis of primary aldosteronism: Bayesian analysis in the absence of a gold standard.

BACKGROUND: Captopril challenge test (CCT), seated saline infusion test (SSIT), oral sodium loading test (OSLT) and fludrocortisone suppression test (FST) are widely used diagnostic tests for primary aldosteronism (PA). These tests differ in terms of safety and complexity. Whether the simpler tests (CCT and SSIT) are comparable in diagnostic performance to the more complex ones (FST and OSLT) is unclear. PURPOSE: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of the four tests. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of hypertensive patients who were screened for PA and completed at least one confirmatory test. The patients were divided into two cohorts: one including those who completed one to three tests was used for the estimation of sensitivity and specificity. The other including those who completed four tests was used for the comparison of accuracy. Bayesian method was used to obtain the sensitivity, specificity, and Youden index of each test. RESULTS: The study included 1011 hypertensive patients. Among them, 895 patients completed one to three tests (including 889 CCT, 605 FST, 611 SSIT and 69 OSLT), and 116 patients completed four tests. SSIT had the highest sensitivity of 0.82(95% CI 0.78-0.86) but the lowest specificity of 0.76(0.70-0.80). OSLT had the lowest sensitivity of 0.65(0.56-0.75) but the highest specificity of 0.91(0.82-0.96). The sensitivity and specificity were 0.78 (95% CI, 0.75-0.82), 0.82 (95% CI, 0.78-0.85), for CCT, and 0.77 (95% CI, 0.73-0.81), 0.87 (95% CI, 0.82-0.91) for FST, respectively. The Youden index was not significantly different among the four tests[0.60(0.55-0.65) for CCT; 0.58(0.51-0.64) for SSIT; (0.64(0.57-0.69) for FST; 0.56(0.43-0.67) for OSLT]. CONCLUSION: The accuracy of simpler tests is comparable to the more complex ones. Considering the safety and simplicity of CCT, it may be a reasonable first choice when confirming the diagnosis of PA.

Comparison of saline infusion test and captopril challenge test in the diagnosis of Chinese with primary aldosteronism in different age groups.

Background: To explore the diagnostic accuracy and the optimal cutoff value between the saline infusion test (SIT) and captopril challenge test (CCT) [including the value and suppression of plasma aldosterone concentration (PAC)] for primary aldosteronism (PA) diagnosing. Methods: A total of 318 patients with hypertension were consecutively enrolled, including 126 patients with PA and 192 patients with essential hypertension (EH), in this observational study. The characteristics of patients and laboratory examinations were collected and compared. The comparison between SIT and CCT was carried by drawing the receiver operator characteristic curve (ROC) and calculating the area under the curve (AUC) to explore the diagnostic accuracy and the optimal cutoff value. Results: The average age was 51.59 ± 10.43 in the PA group and 45.72 ± 12.44 in the EH group (p<0.05). The optimal cutoff value was 10.7 ng/dL for post-CCT PAC, 6.8 ng/dL for post-SIT PAC, and 26.9% for suppression of post-CCT PAC. The diagnostic value of post-CCT PAC was the highest with 0.831 for the AUC and 0.552 for the Youden index. The optimal cutoff value for patients who were <50 years old was 11.5 ng/dL for post-CCT PAC and 8.4 ng/dL for post-SIT PAC. The suppression of post-CCT PAC turned to 18.2% for those of age 50 or older. Conclusion: Compared with SIT, CCT had a higher diagnostic value when post-CCT PAC was used as the diagnostic criterion in Chinese people, while the selection of diagnostic thresholds depended on patient age.

A 120-Minute Saline Infusion Test for the Confirmation of Primary Aldosteronism: A Pilot Study.

BACKGROUND: The saline infusion test (SIT) to confirm primary aldosteronism requires infusing 2 L of normal saline over 240 minutes. Previous studies raised concerns regarding increased blood pressure and worsening hypokalemia during SIT. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic applicability of a SIT that requires 1 L of saline infusion over 120 minutes. METHODS: A cross-sectional study, including all patients in a large medical center who underwent SIT from 1 January 2015 to 30 April 2023. Blood samples were drawn for baseline renin and aldosterone (t = 0) after 2 hours (t = 120 min) and after 4 hours (t = 240 min) of saline infusion. We used ROC analysis to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of various aldosterone cut-off values at t = 120 to confirm primary aldosteronism. RESULTS: The final analysis included 62 patients. A ROC analysis yielded 97% specificity and 90% sensitivity for a plasma aldosterone concentration (PAC) of 397 pmol/L (14 ng/dL) at t = 120 to confirm primary aldosteronism, and an area under the curve of 0.97 (95% CI [0.93, 1.00], P < 0.001). Almost half (44%) of the patients did not suppress PAC below 397 pmol/L (14 ng/dL) at t = 120. Of them, only one (4%) patient suppressed PAC below 276 pmol/L (10 ng/dL) at t = 240. Mean systolic blood pressure increased from 140.1 ±â€…21.3 mm Hg at t = 0 to 147.6 ±â€…14.5 mm Hg at t = 240 (P = 0.011). CONCLUSIONS: A PAC of 397 pmol/L (14 ng/dL) at t = 120 has high sensitivity and specificity for primary aldosteronism confirmation.

The role of confirmatory tests in the diagnosis of primary aldosteronism.

Confirmatory tests for diagnosis of primary aldosteronism (PA) play an important role in sparing patients with a false-positive aldosterone-to-renin ratio (ARR) screening test from undergoing invasive subtyping procedures. We recommend that patients with a positive ARR test should undergo at least one confirmatory test to confirm or exclude the diagnosis of PA before directly proceeding to subtype studies, except for patients with significant PA phenotypes, including spontaneous hypokalemia, plasma aldosterone concentration >20 ng/dL plus plasma renin activity below a detectable level. Although a gold standard confirmatory test has not been identified, we recommend that saline infusion test and captopril challenge test, which were widely used in Taiwan. Patients with PA have been reported to have a higher prevalence of concurrent autonomous cortisol secretion (ACS). ACS is a biochemical condition of mild cortisol overproduction from adrenal lesions, but without the typical clinical features of overt Cushing's syndrome. Concurrent ACS may result in incorrect interpretation of adrenal venous sampling (AVS) and may lead to adrenal insufficiency after adrenalectomy. We recommend screening for ACS in patients with PA scheduled for AVS examinations as well as for adrenalectomy. We recommend the 1-mg overnight dexamethasone suppression test as screening method to detect ACS.

A new machine learning-based prediction model for subtype diagnosis in primary aldosteronism.

Introduction: Unilateral primary aldosteronism (UPA) and bilateral primary aldosteronism (BPA) are the two subtypes of PA. Discriminating UPA from BPA is of great significance. Although adrenal venous sampling (AVS) is the gold standard for diagnosis, it has shortcomings. Thus, improved methods are needed. Methods: The original data were extracted from the public database "Dryad". Ten parameters were included to develop prediction models for PA subtype diagnosis using machine learning technology. Moreover, the optimal model was chose and validated in an external dataset. Results: In the modeling dataset, 165 patients (71 UPA, 94 BPA) were included, while in the external dataset, 43 consecutive patients (20 UPA, 23 BPA) were included. The ten parameters utilized in the prediction model include age, sex, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, aldosterone to renin ratio (ARR), serum potassium, ARR after 50 mg captopril challenge test (CCT), primary aldosterone concentration (PAC) after saline infusion test (SIT), PAC reduction rate after SIT, and number of types of antihypertensive agents at diagnosis. The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, F1 score, and AUC for the optimal model using the random forest classifier were 90.0%, 81.8%, 96.4%, 0.878, and 0.938, respectively, in the testing dataset and 81.4%, 90.0%, 73.9%, 0.818 and 0.887, respectively, in the validating external dataset. The most important variables contributing to the prediction model were PAC after SIT, ARR, and ARR after CCT. Discussion: We developed a machine learning-based predictive model for PA subtype diagnosis based on ten clinical parameters without CT imaging. In the future, artificial intelligence-based prediction models might become a robust prediction tool for PA subtype diagnosis, thereby, might reducing at least some of the requests for CT or AVS and assisting clinical decision-making.

Validation of Existing Clinical Prediction Tools for Primary Aldosteronism Subtyping.

The new clinical prediction score (SCORE) has been recently proposed for primary aldosteronism (PA) subtyping prior to adrenal vein sampling (AVS). This study aimed to compare that SCORE with previously published scores and their validation using a cohort of patients at our center who had had positive SIT confirming PA and had been diagnosed with either bilateral PA according to AVS or unilateral PA if biochemically cured after an adrenalectomy. Final diagnoses were used to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the proposed clinical prediction tools. Only Kamemura's model (with a maximum score of 4 points) and Kobayashi's score (with a maximum score of 12 points) reached 100% reliability for prediction of bilateral PA; however, with sensitivity of only 3%. On the other hand, the values of SCORE = 3 (with sensitivity of 48%), the SPACE score ≥18 (with sensitivity of 35%), the Kobayashi's score ≤2 (with sensitivity of 28%), and the Kocjan's score = 3 (with sensitivity of 28%) were able to predict unilateral PA with 100% probability. Furthermore, Umakoshi's and Young's models both reached 100% reliability for a unilateral PA with score = 4 and both predictive factors together respectively; however, the sensitivity was lower compared with previous models; 4% and 14%, respectively. None of the clinical prediction tools applied to our cohort predicted unilateral and bilateral subtypes together with the expected high diagnostic performance, and therefore can only be used for precisely defined cases.

Adrenal Venous Sampling Could Be Omitted before Surgery in Patients with Conn's Adenoma Confirmed by Computed Tomography and Higher Normal Aldosterone Concentration after Saline Infusion Test.

PURPOSE: Adrenal venous sampling (AVS) performed to distinguish unilateral and bilateral primary aldosteronism (PA) is invasive and poorly standardized. This study aimed to identify non-invasive characteristics that can select the patients with unilateral PA who could bypass AVS before surgery. METHODS: A single-center study collected a total of 450 patients with PA. Development and validation cohorts included 242 and 208 patients. The AVS was successful in 150 and 138 patients from the cohorts, and the unilateral PA was found in 96 and 94 patients, respectively. Clinical factors independently associated with lateralized AVS in multivariable logistic regression were used to construct a unilateral PA prediction score (SCORE). RESULTS: The proposed SCORE was calculated as a sum of the prevalence of adrenal nodule on computed tomography (2 points) and plasma/serum aldosterone concentration ≥ 165 ng/L after the saline infusion test (SIT) (1 point). Importantly, the SCORE = 3 points identified 48% of unilateral PA patients with a specificity of 100% in the development cohort. The zero rate of false-positive classifications was preserved with the same cut-off value in the validation cohort. CONCLUSIONS: AVS could be omitted before surgery in patients with typical Conn´s adenoma provided the aldosterone concentration ≥ 165 ng/L after the SIT.

Are We Only Detecting the Tip of the Iceberg? A Nationwide Study on Primary Aldosteronism with up to 8-Year Follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Long-term follow-up studies on primary aldosteronism (PA) are lacking. OBJECTIVE: We aim to review results of diagnostic procedures and histopathology for patients diagnosed during 2012-2016 in Iceland, compare unilateral (UD) and bilateral disease (BD) and assess treatment response. METHODS: Thirty-two patients aged 28-88 were diagnosed and treated according to guidelines. RESULTS: The majority had BD. Everyone needed potassium supplementation at case detection. We saw a reduction in systolic blood pressure (p < .001, both groups), antihypertensive agents (p = .002 UD and p = .04 BD) and potassium supplementation (p < .001, both groups). CONCLUSION: Similar treatment response was seen in both subgroups. Ratio of hypokalemia and number of cases indicates severe PA underdiagnosis in Iceland.

Reassessment of Urinary Aldosterone Measurement After Saline Infusion in Primary Aldosteronism.

CONTEXT: Urinary aldosterone levels (Uald) are widely measured in the oral sodium-loading test to confirm primary aldosteronism (PA), but reliable studies on their diagnostic value are limited. This may be due to the difficulty in collecting urine with reliable accuracy, keeping oral sodium intake constant between patients. Therefore, we focused on 24-hour Uald after intravenous saline infusion in a hospitalized setting, which provides a reliable sodium load in consistent amounts. OBJECTIVE: Comparing plasma aldosterone concentrations (PAC) and Uald after saline infusion in the sitting position, to evaluate the accuracy in determining PA subtypes and the correlation of both measurements. DESIGN AND SETTING: This was a retrospective cross-sectional study in a single referral center. PATIENTS: Of 53 patients without renal dysfunction who were diagnosed with PA and underwent adrenal venous sampling, 16 and 37 were diagnosed with unilateral and bilateral PA, respectively. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Uald collected for 24 hours and PAC after saline infusion. RESULTS: The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for diagnosing unilateral PA was not significantly different between Uald and PAC after saline infusion (0.921 and 0.958, respectively; P = 0.370). The predicted optimal cutoff value of Uald was 16.5 µg/day (sensitivity, 87.5%; specificity, 100%), and that of PAC after saline infusion was 19.3 ng/dL (sensitivity, 87.5%; specificity, 97.3%). In studied patients with PA, Uald was positively correlated with PAC after saline infusion (r = 0.617; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: We reassessed Uald in PA patients under sufficient sodium loading and demonstrated the correlation between Uald and PAC after saline infusion.

[The Value of Serum Potassium and Ratio of Sodium to Potassium after Saline Infusion Test in Differential Diagnosis of Primary Hyperaldosteronism].

OBJECTIVE: To explore the electrolyte characteristics between different types of primary aldosteronism (PA), especially the value of serum potassium and the ratio of sodium to potassium after saline infusion test (SIT) in differential diagnosis of PA. METHODS: The clinical data was collected from 135 patients who received screening for the causes of hypertension from Jan. 2009 to Dec. 2018 in West China Hospital. The patients were divided into two groups: essential hypertension group (EH group, 34 patients) and primary aldosteronism group (PA group, 101 patients). PA patients were divided into aldosterone-producing adenoma group (APA group, 60 patients) and idiopathic hyperaldosteronism group (IHA group, 41 patients). To analyze the value of serum potassium and the ratio of sodium to potassium after SIT in the differential diagnosis of PA with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. RESULTS: Compared with EH group, the serum potassium level of APA group was lower either before or after SIT ( P<0.01). The ratio of sodium to potassium before and after SIT in APA group were higher than that in EH group ( P<0.05). There were no differences between APA group and IHA group in the level of serum potassium and the ratio of sodium to potassium before SIT. The level of serum potassium after SIT in APA group was lower than that in IHA group ( P<0.01), and the ratio of sodium to potassium was higher ( P<0.05). The area under ROC curve ( AUC) of serum potassium level and the ratio of sodium to potassium after SIT were 0.641 and 0.646, respectively, while the AUC of aldosterone level was 0.788. The optimal cut-off value of serum sodium level was 3.56 mmol/L, with a sensitivity and specificity of 46.7% and 85.4%. The optimal cut-off value of ratio of sodium to potassium was 39.09, with 53.3% and 80.5% in sensitivity and specificity. CONCLUSION: The serum potassium and the ratio of sodium to potassium after SIT has limited diagnostic value for its low sensitivity in differential diagnosis of PA.

Evaluation of various confirmatory tests for the diagnosis of aldosterone-producing adenoma.

INTRODUCTION: Adrenal venous sampling is useful for discriminating unilateral and bilateral hypersecretion in patients with primary aldosteronism, but it is relatively invasive. To determine the site of hypersecretion more non-invasively, we evaluated predictors of unilateral hypersecretion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated the baseline characteristics and the results of confirmatory tests of 123 patients with primary aldosteronism who underwent adrenal venous sampling. RESULTS: Unilateral hypersecretion was identified in 22.0%. The plasma aldosterone concentration and aldosterone-renin ratio were significantly higher and serum potassium concentration and plasma renin activity were significantly lower in patients with unilateral hypersecretion. Plasma aldosterone concentrations after captopril challenge test, saline infusion test and rapid adrenocorticotropic hormone stimulation test were significantly higher among patients with unilateral hypersecretion. The plasma aldosterone concentration reduction ratio in saline infusion test and plasma aldosterone concentration elevation ratio during rapid adrenocorticotropic hormone stimulation test were significantly higher in patients with unilateral hypersecretion. However, areas under the curve for these parameters were not superior to the values after confirmatory tests. CONCLUSIONS: The plasma aldosterone concentration values after captopril challenge test, saline infusion test and rapid adrenocorticotropic hormone stimulation test were useful for identifying patients with unilateral hypersecretion. However, value changes or ratios during confirmatory tests are less useful for this aim.

Development of a clinical decision tool to reduce diagnostic testing for primary aldosteronism in patients with difficult-to-control hypertension.

BACKGROUND: Satisfactory tools to preclude low-risk patients from intensive diagnostic testing for primary aldosteronism (PA) are lacking. Therefore, we aimed to develop a decision tool to determine which patients with difficult-to-control hypertension have a low probability of PA, thereby limiting the exposure to invasive testing while at the same time increasing the efficiency of testing in the remaining patients. METHODS: Data from consecutive patients with difficult-to-control hypertension, analysed through a standardized diagnostic protocol between January 2010 and October 2017 (n = 824), were included in this cross-sectional study. PA was diagnosed by a combined approach: 1) elevated aldosterone-to-renin ratio (> 5.0 pmol/fmol/s), confirmed with 2) non-suppressible aldosterone after standardized saline infusion (≥280 pmol/L). Multivariable logistic regression analyses including seven pre-specified clinical variables (age, systolic blood pressure, serum potassium, potassium supplementation, serum sodium, eGFR and HbA1c) was performed. After correction for optimism, test reliability, discriminative performance and test characteristics were determined. RESULTS: PA was diagnosed in 40 (4.9%) of 824 patients. Predicted probabilities of PA agreed well with observed frequencies and the c-statistic was 0.77 (95% confidence interval (95%CI) 0.70-0.83). Predicted probability cut-off values of 1.0-2.5% prevented unnecessary testing in 8-32% of the patients with difficult-to-control hypertension, carrying sensitivities of 0.98 (95%CI 0.96-0.99) and 0.92 (0.83-0.97), and negative predictive values of 0.99 (0.98-1.00) and 0.99 (0.97-0.99). CONCLUSIONS: With a decision tool, based on seven easy-to-measure clinical variables, patients with a low probability of PA can be reliably selected and a considerable proportion of patients with difficult-to-control hypertension can be spared intensive diagnostic testing.

Mass spectrometry reveals misdiagnosis of primary aldosteronism with scheduling for adrenalectomy due to immunoassay interference.

BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of primary aldosteronism (PA) involves a multistep process reliant on the accuracy of aldosterone measurements at each step. We report on immunoassay interference leading to a wrongful diagnosis and indication for surgical intervention. CASE: A 38-year old hypertensive male with a 1.4 cm left adrenal mass was diagnosed with PA based on an elevated aldosterone:renin ratio and a positive saline infusion test. Adrenal venous sampling (AVS) indicated left-sided aldosterone hypersecretion, supporting a decision to remove the left adrenal. The patient was also enrolled in a study to evaluate mass spectrometry-based steroid profiling, which indicated plasma aldosterone concentrations measured in five different peripheral samples averaging only 11% those of the immunoassay. Mass spectrometric measurements did not support left-sided adrenal aldosterone hypersecretion. Two independent laboratories confirmed differences in measurements by immunoassay and mass spectrometry. Lowered concentrations measured by the immunoassay that matched those by mass spectrometry were achieved after sample purification to remove macromolecules, confirming immunoassay interference. CONCLUSIONS: Although our patient may represent an isolated case of immunoassay interference leading to misdiagnosis of PA, unnecessary AVS and potentially wrongful removal of an adrenal, it is also possible that such inaccuracies may impact the diagnostic process and treatment for other patients.

A clinical prediction score using age at diagnosis and saline infusion test parameters can predict aldosterone-producing adenoma from idiopathic adrenal hyperplasia.

PURPOSE: Accurate subtyping of the primary aldosteronism into aldosterone-producing adenoma (APA) and idiopathic adrenal hyperplasia (IAH) is important to direct for specific treatment modalities. The objective of the study was to compare the clinical and biochemical parameters of APA and IAH patients to derive a Clinical Prediction Score reliably predicting APA from IAH. METHODS: This was a retrospective multi-centre study recruiting 38 APA patients and 42 IAH patients from four major hospitals in Hong Kong using database from Surgical Outcomes Monitoring and Improvement Programme and Clinical Data Analysis and Reporting System. Their clinical and biochemical parameters were evaluated. RESULTS: Patients in APA group were younger than IAH group (mean age 48.6 ± 9.2 vs. 57.1 ± 7.3 years old, p < 0.001), had more suppressed renin before saline infusion in saline infusion test (SIT) (median 0.19 [IQR 0.15-0.37] vs. 0.39 [IQR 0.19-0.69] ng/mL/h, p = 0.01), and higher aldosterone level after saline infusion in SIT (median 674 [IQR 498-1000] vs. 327 [IQR 242-483] pmol/L, p < 0.001). A clinical prediction score using three parameters was devised, comprising age at diagnosis < 50 years, PRA before saline infusion in SIT ≤ 0.26 ng/mL/h, and aldosterone level after saline infusion in SIT ≥ 424 pmol/L. A score of 2 would predict APA with a sensitivity of 84.2% and specificity of 88.1%, and a score of 3 would predict APA with a sensitivity of 31.6% and specificity of 100%. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical Prediction Score based on the combination of age at diagnosis, PRA, and aldosterone level in the saline infusion tests could reliably predict APA from IAH.

Aldosterone Reduction Rate After Saline Infusion Test May Be a Novel Prediction in Patients With Primary Aldosteronism.

OBJECTIVE: Accurate assessment and localization of aldosterone-producing adenomas (APAs) are essential for the treatment of primary aldosteronism (PA). Although adrenal venous sampling (AVS) is the standard method of reference for subtype diagnosis in PA, controversy exists concerning the criteria for its interpretation. This study aims to determine better indicators that can reliably predict subtypes of PA. METHOD: Retrospective, single-cohort analysis including 209 patients with PA who were subjected to AVS. Eighty-two patients whose plasma aldosterone concentrations (PAC) were normalized after surgery were histopathologically or genetically diagnosed with APA. The accuracy of image findings was compared to AVS results. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis between the operated and the no-apparent laterality groups was performed using AVS parameters and loading test for diagnosis of PA. RESULT: Agreement between image findings and AVS results was 56.3%. ROC curve analysis revealed that the lateralization index (LI) after adrenocorticotropin stimulation cutoff was 2.40, with 98.8% sensitivity and 97.1% specificity. The contralateral suppression index (CSI) cutoff value was 1.19, with 98.0% sensitivity and 93.9% specificity. All patients over the LI and CSI cutoff values exhibited unilateral subtypes. Among the loading test, the best classification accuracy was achieved using the PAC reduction rate after a saline infusion test (SIT) >33.8%, which yielded 87.2% sensitivity or a PAC after a SIT <87.9 pg/mL with 86.2% specificity for predicting bilateral PA. CONCLUSION: The combined criteria of the PAC reduction rate and PAC after the SIT can determine which subset of patients with APA who should be performed AVS for validation.

A combination of captopril challenge test after saline infusion test improves diagnostic accuracy for primary aldosteronism.

CONTEXT: The saline infusion test (SIT) is a common confirmatory test for primary aldosteronism (PA). According to the guideline, a postinfusion plasma aldosterone concentration (PAC) of 5-10 ng/dL is considered indeterminate, and recommendations for diagnostic strategies are currently limited in this situation. OBJECTIVE: To explore whether an addition of the captopril challenge test (CCT) could improve the diagnostic accuracy in patients with indeterminate SIT. METHODS: A total of 280 hypertensive patients with high risk of PA completed this study. Subjects were defined as SIT indeterminate based on their PAC post-SIT. These patients then underwent the CCT where PACs post-CCT >11 ng/dL were considered positive. Using fludrocortisone suppression test (FST) as the reference standard, diagnostic parameters including area under the receiver-operator characteristic curves (AUC), sensitivity and specificity were calculated. RESULTS: There were 65 subjects (23.2%) diagnosed as PA indeterminate after SIT. With the addition of CCT, true-positive numbers increased from 134 to 147, and false-negative numbers decreased from 27 to 14. Compared to SIT alone, a combination of SIT and CCT showed a higher AUC (0.91 [0.87,0.94] vs 0.87 [0.83,0.91], P = .041) and an increased sensitivity for the diagnosis of PA (0.91 [0.86,0.95] vs 0.83 [0.76,0.89], P = .028), while the specificity remained similar. In the subgroup with indeterminate SIT results, using PAC post-CCT resulted in a 36% higher AUC than using PAC post-SIT alone for the diagnosis of PA. CONCLUSION: For patients under investigation for possible PA who have indeterminate SIT results, an addition of CCT improves the diagnostic accuracy.

Diagnosis of central diabetes insipidus using a vasopressin radioimmunoassay during hypertonic saline infusion.

Central diabetes insipidus (CDI) is characterized by polyuria and polydipsia caused by impairment of arginine vasopressin (AVP) secretion. In this study, we evaluated plasma AVP concentrations during a hypertonic saline infusion test using a new AVP radioimmunoassay (RIA) which is now available in Japan. Thirteen control subjects, mostly with hypothalamo-pituitary disease but without CDI, and 13 patients with CDI were enrolled in the study. Whether or not subjects had CDI was determined based on the totality of clinical data, which included urine volumes and osmolality. Regression analysis of plasma AVP and serum Na concentrations revealed that the gradient was significantly lower in the CDI group than in the control group. The area under the receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) curve was 0.99, and the <0.1 gradient cut-off values for the simple regression line to distinguish CDI from control had a 100% sensitivity and a 77% specificity. The ROC analysis with estimated plasma AVP concentrations at a serum Na concentration of 149 mEq/L showed that the area under the ROC curve was 1.0 and the <1.0 pg/mL cut-off values of plasma AVP had a 99% sensitivity and a 95% specificity. We conclude that measurement of AVP by RIA during a hypertonic saline infusion test can differentiate patients with CDI from those without CDI with a high degree of accuracy. Further investigation is required to confirm whether the cut-off values shown in this study are also applicable to a diagnosis of partial CDI or a differential diagnosis between CDI and primary polydipsia.

Primary aldosteronism in Klinefelter's syndrome: two cases.

SUMMARY: Primary aldosteronism (PA) is more common than expected. Aberrant adrenal expression of luteinizing hormone (LH) receptor in patients with PA has been reported; however, its physiological role on the development of PA is still unknown. Herein, we report two unique cases of PA in patients with untreated Klinefelter's syndrome, characterized as increased serum LH, suggesting a possible contribution of the syndrome to PA development. Case 1 was a 39-year-old man with obesity and hypertension since his 20s. His plasma aldosterone concentration (PAC) and renin activity (PRA) were 220 pg/mL and 0.4 ng/mL/h, respectively. He was diagnosed as having bilateral PA by confirmatory tests and adrenal venous sampling (AVS). Klinefelter's syndrome was suspected as he showed gynecomastia and small testes, and it was confirmed on the basis of a low serum total testosterone level (57.3 ng/dL), high serum LH level (50.9 mIU/mL), and chromosome analysis. Case 2 was a 28-year-old man who had untreated Klinefelter's syndrome diagnosed in his childhood and a 2-year history of hypertension and hypokalemia. PAC and PRA were 247 pg/mL and 0.3 ng/mL/h, respectively. He was diagnosed as having a 10 mm-sized aldosterone-producing adenoma (APA) by AVS. In the APA, immunohistochemical analysis showed co-expression of LH receptor and CYP11B2. Our cases of untreated Klinefelter's syndrome complicated with PA suggest that increased serum LH levels and adipose tissues, caused by primary hypogonadism, could contribute to PA development. The possible complication of PA in hypertensive patients with Klinefelter's syndrome should be carefully considered. LEARNING POINTS: The pathogenesis of primary aldosteronism is still unclear. Expression of luteinizing hormone receptor has been reported in aldosterone-producing adenoma. Serum luteinizing hormone, which is increased in patients with Klinefelter's syndrome, might contribute to the development of primary aldosteronism.

The number of positive confirmatory tests is associated with the clinical presentation and incidence of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events in primary aldosteronism.

Primary aldosteronism (PA) is a major cause of secondary hypertension and presents a higher risk for cardio-cerebrovascular (CCV) events compared with essential hypertension. To diagnose PA after a positive screening test, at least one of three available confirmatory tests [the saline infusion test (SIT), the captopril challenge test (CCT) or the furosemide upright test (FUT)] should be performed. The aim of our study was to investigate the relationship between the number of positive confirmatory tests using SIT and CCT and the clinical presentation and prevalence of CCV events in 398 PA patients. The number of PA patients doubled when PA diagnosis was defined by positive results on either the SIT or CCT confirmatory tests (single positive) compared to positive results on both the SIT and CCT confirmatory tests (double positive). We also found a more typical clinical presentation of PA, such as the use of more antihypertensive drugs to control blood pressure and a higher incidence of hypokalemia, in PA patients with double positive confirmatory tests than in those with a single positive confirmatory test. The incidence of CCV events in PA patients with double positive confirmatory tests was significantly higher than that in those with a single positive confirmatory test. Our results demonstrated that the number of PA patients was doubled by the use of PA diagnostic criteria using a single positive confirmatory test compared to the use of double positive confirmatory tests. PA patients with double positive confirmatory tests were associated with a more typical clinical presentation and a higher incidence of CCV events than those with a single positive confirmatory test.