Use of Cardiovascular Disease Secondary Prevention Medications in Four Middle East Countries in a Community Setting.

Background: Evidence-based International clinical practice guidelines, universally recommend secondary prevention medications for those with previous cardiovascular disease (CVD). There is limited data on the community use of these medications in the Middle East (ME). Objectives: This study assesses the use and predictors of evidence based secondary prevention medications in individuals with a history of CVD [coronary heart disease (CHD) or stroke]. Methods: Between 2005 and 2015, we enrolled 11,228 individuals aged between 35-70 years from 52 urban and 35 rural communities from four ME countries, United Arab Emirates (n = 1499), Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (n = 2046), Occupied Palestinian Territory (n = 1668) and Islamic Republic of Iran (n = 6013). With standardized questionnaires, we report estimates of medication use in those with CVD at national level and the independent predictors of their utilization through a multivariable analysis model. Results: Of the total ME cohort, 614 (5.5%) had CVD, of which 115 (1.0%) had stroke, 523 (4.7%) had CHD and 24 (0.2%) had both. The mean age of those with CVD was 56.6 ± 8.8 years and 269 (43.8%) were female. Overall, only 23.5% of those with CVD reported using three or more proven secondary prevention medications, and a substantial proportion (stroke 27.8%, CHD 25.8%) did not take any of these medications. In a fully adjusted analysis, increasing age, female gender, higher education, higher wealth in individual household, residence in a higher income country as well as being obese, hypertensive or diabetic were independent predictors of medication use. Conclusion: The use of secondary prevention medication is low in ME and has not reached the modest recommended WHO target of 50% use of 3 or more medications. Independent factors of higher use were, better socioeconomic status (household wealth, country wealth and education) and better contact and accessibility to health care (increasing age, female gender, obesity, diabetes and hypertension).

Core Components of Cardiac Rehabilitation Programs: 2024 Update: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association and the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation.

The science of cardiac rehabilitation and the secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease has progressed substantially since the most recent American Heart Association and American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation update on the core components of cardiac rehabilitation and secondary prevention programs was published in 2007. In addition, the advent of new care models, including virtual and remote delivery of cardiac rehabilitation services, has expanded the ways that cardiac rehabilitation programs can reach patients. In this scientific statement, we update the scientific basis of the core components of patient assessment, nutritional counseling, weight management and body composition, cardiovascular disease and risk factor management, psychosocial management, aerobic exercise training, strength training, and physical activity counseling. In addition, in recognition that high-quality cardiac rehabilitation programs regularly monitor their processes and outcomes and engage in an ongoing process of quality improvement, we introduce a new core component of program quality. High-quality program performance will be essential to improve widely documented low enrollment and adherence rates and reduce health disparities in cardiac rehabilitation access.

PCSK9 inhibitors on the management of primary and secondary cardiovascular prevention.

BACKGROUND: Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors (PCSK9i) have represented an important change in the management of hypercholesterolemia, although, until now, they have barely been used. Without PCSK9i, many patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (CVD) or those at very high risk do not reach their therapeutic LDLc objectives. OBJECTIVE: The analysis aimed to examine the clinical and biochemical characteristics of subjects receiving PCSK9i treatment in the Dyslipidemia Registry of the Spanish Atherosclerosis Society. METHODS: All consecutive subjects aged ≥ 18 years from different Lipid Units included in the Dyslipidemia Registry of the SEA were analyzed. Inclusion criteria consisted of unrelated patients aged ≥ 18 at the time of inclusion with hypercholesterolemia (LDL-C ≥ 130 mg/dL or non-HDL-C ≥ 160 mg/dL after the exclusion of secondary causes) who were studied for at least two years after inclusion. Participants' baseline and final visit clinical and biochemical characteristics were analyzed based on whether they were on primary or secondary prevention and whether they were taking PCSK9i at the end of follow-up. RESULTS: Eight hundred twenty-nine patients were analyzed, 7014 patients in primary prevention and 1281 in secondary prevention at baseline. 4127 subjects completed the required follow-up for the final analysis. The median follow-up duration was 7 years (IQR 3.0-10.0). Five hundred patients (12.1%) were taking PCSK9i at the end of the follow-up. The percentage of PCSK9i use reached 35.6% (n = 201) and 8.7% (n = 318) in subjects with and without CVD, respectively. Subjects on PCSK9i and oral lipid-lowering agents with and without CVD achieved LDLc reductions of 80.3% and 75.1%, respectively, concerning concentrations without lipid-lowering drugs. Factors associated with PCSK9i use included increasing age, LDLc without lipid-lowering drugs and the Dutch Lipid Clinic Network (DLCN) score. However, hypertension, diabetes, smoking, and LDLc after oral lipid-lowering drugs were not independent factors associated with PCSK9i prescription. In subjects with CVD, the use of PCSK9i was higher in men than in women (an odds ratio of 1.613, P = 0.048). CONCLUSIONS: Approximately one-third of CVD patients received PCSK9i at the end of follow-up. The use of PCSK9i was more focused on baseline LDLc concentrations rather than on CVD risk. Women received less PCSK9i in secondary prevention compared to men.

Comparison of American and European Guideline Recommendations for Diagnostic Workup and Secondary Prevention of Ischemic Stroke and Transient Ischemic Attack.

Guidelines help to facilitate treatment decisions based on available evidence, and also to provide recommendations in areas of uncertainty. In this paper, we compare the recommendations for stroke workup and secondary prevention of ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack of the American Heart Association (AHA)/American Stroke Association (ASA) with the European Stroke Organization (ESO) guidelines. The primary aim of this paper is to offer clinicians guidance by identifying areas where there is consensus and where consensus is lacking, in the absence or presence of high-level evidence. We compared AHA/ASA with the ESO guideline recommendations for 7 different topics related to diagnostic stroke workup and secondary prevention. We categorized the recommendations based on class and level of evidence to determine whether there were relevant differences in the ratings of evidence that the guidelines used for its recommendations. Finally, we summarized major topics of agreement and disagreement, while also prominent knowledge gaps were identified. In total, we found 63 ESO and 82 AHA/ASA recommendations, of which 38 were on the same subject. Most recommendations are largely similar, but not all are based on high-level evidence. For many recommendations, AHA/ASA and ESO assigned different levels of evidence. For the 10 recommendations with Level A evidence (high quality) in AHA/ASA, ESO only labeled 4 of these as high quality. There are many remaining issues with either no or insufficient evidence, and some topics that are not covered by both guidelines. Most ESO and AHA/ASA Guideline recommendations for stroke workup and secondary prevention were similar. However not all were based on high-level evidence and the appointed level of evidence often differed. Clinicians should not blindly follow all guideline recommendations; the accompanying level of evidence informs which recommendations are based on robust evidence. Topics with lower levels of evidence, or those with recommendations that disagree or are missing, may be an incentive for further clinical research.

Lipoprotein(a) in interventional cardiology: identifying patients at highest risk of recurrent cardiovascular events through early recognition - a case based review.

INTRODUCTION: Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is linked to higher risks of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Current guideline recommendations are quite liberal on measuring Lp(a) (Class IIa, Level C), and may lead to underuse among (interventional) cardiologists. AREAS COVERED: This case-based narrative review outlines four clinical cases of patients with elevated Lp(a) to illustrate its pathophysiological impact on coronary artery disease (CAD). The expert consensus statements from the American Heart Association (AHA) and European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS) served as the basis of this review. More recent publications, from 2023 to 2024, were accessed through the MEDLINE online library. EXPERT OPINION: We highlighted the importance of routine Lp(a) measurement in identifying patients at high risk for atherosclerosis, necessitating potent risk mitigation. Measuring Lp(a) helps clinicians identify which patients are at highest residual risk, who require potent pharmacological treatment and special attention during catheter interventions. As noninvasive and advanced intravascular imaging modalities evolve, future catheterization laboratories will integrate advanced imaging, diagnostics, and treatment, facilitating tailored patient care. Knowing Lp(a) levels is crucial in this context. While Lp(a)-lowering drugs are currently investigated in clinical trials, it is of paramount importance to know Lp(a) levels and strive toward aggressive management of other modifiable risk factors in patients with elevated Lp(a) and established symptomatic CAD being diagnosed or treated in catheterization laboratories.

The CNIC polypill (Acetylsalicylic acid + Atorvastatin + Rampril) in secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes: A comparative analysis with alternative therapeutic approaches.

BACKGROUND: Patients with type 2 DM (T2DM) and established cardiovascular disease (CVD) are at high risk of recurrent CV events. We analysed the use of the CNIC-polypill (acetylsalicylic acid, ramipril, and atorvastatin) compared with other therapeutic strategies in patients with T2DM and CVD from the retrospective NEPTUNO study. METHODS: Patients were stratified into four therapeutic approaches: CNIC-polypill, its monocomponents as loose medications, equipotent medications, and other therapies. Outcomes included the 2-year cumulative incidence and risk of recurrent major adverse CV events (MACE) and CV death, risk factors control, medication persistence, and utilisation of healthcare resources and costs. RESULTS: After two years, T2DM patients treated with Monocomponents, Equipotent drugs, or Other therapies had increased recurrent MACE risk compared to CNIC-polypill (11 %, 23 %, and 44 %, respectively; P < 0.05) and shorter median time to CV events (305-377 vs. 396 days; P < 0.05). The CNIC-polypill group achieved a significant 11.2 % increase in patients reaching LDL-c targets <70 mg/dL, outperforming other strategies. It also exhibited superior triglyceride control and a higher proportion achieving the <130/80 mmHg blood pressure goal. The CNIC-polypill cohort displayed significantly higher 24-month persistence (71.5 % vs. 54.7 %-58.3 %, p < 0.05) and lower mean adjusted costs per patient (€5083 vs. €6000-€6523; p < 0.05). In a comparative analysis, T2DM patients had lower baseline LDL-c and total cholesterol levels than non-T2DM counterparts yet experienced a higher incidence of recurrent MACE over two years. CONCLUSION: The CNIC-polypill (ASA, atorvastatin and ramipril) emerged as a promising treatment for patients with CVD, particularly those with T2DM, offering improved clinical outcomes and economic efficiency.

Impact of European Stroke Organisation Secondary Prevention Guideline for Ischaemic Stroke / Transient Ischaemic Attack.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to assess secondary prevention strategies after ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We investigated the impact of European Stroke Organisation (ESO) Guideline recommendations for secondary prevention on recurrent events among people with non-cardioembolic ischaemic stroke or TIA. We assessed the following interventions by survival analysis or modelling impacts from clinical trial data: two blood pressure (BP) drugs compared to one drug; LDL-cholesterol target <1.8 mmol/L; and pioglitazone therapy. Outcomes were mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and recurrent stroke or myocardial infarction (MI). RESULTS: We included 4,037 people admitted between 01/12/2015 to 31/12/2018: mean (SD) age 68.6 (12.9) years; 1984 (49.1%) female and median (IQR) follow-up 2.2 (1.5-3.1) years. Prescription of two BP drugs was associated with reduced mortality in our sample of 2238 people with hypertension (HR 0.64, 95%CI 0.51-0.81; P<0.001). We estimate an LDL-cholesterol target <1.8 mmol/L could reduce MACE incidence from 128 to 114 events (95%CI 103-127) in our sample of 1024 people with LDL-cholesterol 1.8 mmol/L who were not already prescribed intensive lipid-lowering therapy over median (IQR) 2.2 (1.5-2.9) years follow-up (ARR 1.38%, NNT 73). We estimate pioglitazone therapy could reduce incidence of recurrent stroke or MI from 192 to 169 events (95%CI 156-185) in our sample of 1587 people with diabetes or insulin resistance over median (IQR) 2.4 (1.7-3.2) years follow-up (ARR 1.45%, NNT 69). CONCLUSIONS: We estimate that implementing ESO guidelines in a Scottish population after ischaemic stroke or TIA would reduce mortality and recurrent cardiovascular events.

Designing the First Trials for Parkinson's Prevention.

For decades the greatest goal of Parkinson's disease (PD) research has often been distilled to the discovery of treatments that prevent the disease or its progression. However, until recently only the latter has been realistically pursued through randomized clinical trials of candidate disease-modifying therapy (DMT) conducted on individuals after they received traditional clinical diagnosis of PD (i.e., tertiary prevention trials). Now, in light of major advances in our understanding of the prodromal stages of PD, as well as its genetics and biomarkers, the first secondary prevention trials for PD are beginning. In this review, we take stock of DMT trials to date, summarize the breakthroughs that allow the identification of cohorts at high risk of developing a traditional diagnosis of PD, and describe key design elements of secondary prevention trials and how they depend on the prodromal stage being targeted. These elements address whom to enroll, what interventions to test, and how to measure secondary prevention (i.e., slowed progression during the prodromal stages of PD). Although these design strategies, along with the biological definition, subtype classification, and staging of the disease are evolving, all are driven by continued progress in the underlying science and integrated by a broad motivated community of stakeholders. While considerable methodological challenges remain, opportunities to move clinical trials of DMT to earlier points in the disease process than ever before have begun to unfold, and the prospects for PD prevention are nowtangible.

Intensive early and sustained lowering of non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol after myocardial infarction and prognosis: the SWEDEHEART registry.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) provides an estimate of lipid-associated risk and is a secondary treatment target after myocardial infarction (MI). The aim was to study the relationship between non-HDL-C levels after MI and risk of adverse outcomes. METHODS: From the SWEDEHEART registry, 56,262 patients with MI were included. Outcomes were major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE: death, MI, ischaemic stroke), death, and non-fatal MI. Non-HDL-C was assessed at admission, 2 months, and 1 year. Target achievement (<2.2 mmol/L) of non-HDL-C, timing thereof, and outcomes were assessed. RESULTS: During median follow-up of 5.4 years, 9549 had MACE, 5427 died, and 3946 had MI. Long-term hazard ratio (HR) for MACE in the lowest versus the highest quartile of achieved non-HDL-C at 1 year was 0.76 (95% confidence interval 0.71-0.81). Short-term results were consistent also when assessing non-HDL-C levels at 2 months, including early events up to 1 year (HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.68-0.92). Similar results were observed for all outcomes. Patients achieving both early and sustained targets had lowest risk of outcomes (HR 0.80 95% CI 0.74-0.86) versus patients achieving target early or late (HR for both 0.86, 95% CI 0.79-0.93). CONCLUSIONS: The lowest achieved levels both at 2 months and at 1 year of non-HDL-C were associated with better outcome. The lowest risk was observed when target was achieved within 2 months of MI and sustained thereafter. These findings challenge the current stepwise approach for cholesterol lowering after MI which inevitably results in delaying goal attainment and possible harm.

[How can nurses help prevent coercive control?] / Quelle contribution des infirmiers à la prévention du contrôle coercitif ?

Able to work in any sector, with patients of any age and from any socioeconomic or cultural background, the state-qualified nurse is a front-line player, likely to come into contact with victims of violence between (ex) intimate partners. In the current context of growing awareness of the concept of coercive control, this caregiver has a vital role to play in preventing this health and social scourge.

Evaluation of a digital patient education programme in patients with coronary artery disease, a survey-based study.

INTRODUCTION: Patient education programmes focusing on risk factor modification and lifestyle changes are well established as part of cardiac rehabilitation in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). As participation rates are low, digital patient education programmes (DPE) are interesting alternatives to increase access. Understanding patients' perceptions of DPE are important in terms of successful implementation in clinical practice but are not well known. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess patients' perceptions of using a DPE in terms of end-user acceptance and usability, perceived significance for lifestyle changes and secondary preventive goal fulfilment in patients with CAD. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional survey-based study. The survey was distributed to all 1625 patients with acute coronary syndrome or chronic CAD with revascularisation, who were registered users of the DPE between 2020 and 2022 as part of cardiac rehabilitation. The survey contained 64 questions about e.g., acceptance and usability, perceived significance for making lifestyle changes and secondary preventive goal fulfilment. Patients who had never logged in to the DPE received questions about their reasons for not logging in. Data were analysed descriptively. RESULTS: A total of 366 patients (mean age: 69.1 ± 11.3 years, 20% female) completed the survey and among those 207 patients (57%) had used the DPE. Patients reported that the DPE was simple to use (80%) and improved access to healthcare (67-75%). A total of 69% of the patients were generally satisfied with the DPE, > 60% reported that the DPE increased their knowledge about secondary preventive treatment goals and approximately 60% reported having a healthy lifestyle today. On the other hand, 35% of the patients would have preferred a hospital-based education programme. Among the 159 patients (43%) who had never used the DPE, the most reported reason was a perceived need for more information about how to use the DPE (52%). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows an overall high level of patient acceptance and usability of the DPE, which supports its continued development and long-term role in cardiac rehabilitation in patients with CAD. Future studies should assess associations between participation in the DPE and clinical outcomes, such as secondary preventive goal fulfilment and hospitalisation.

The use of DOACs in the secondary prevention of venous thromboembolism in patients with severe thrombophilia: communication from the ISTH SSC Subcommittee on Physiological Anticoagulants and Thrombophilia.

Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs) are the first line anticoagulants for the secondary prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, patients with severe inherited thrombophilias represent a group where the efficiency and safety of DOACs is poorly studied. In this communication, we focus on the utility of DOACs in the secondary prevention of VTE in patients with severe thrombophilia. Current evidence is based only on cohort or single center studies, and poor data is available on compliance of the patients in the studies. Analysis of the studies suggested that full-dose DOACs and vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) have a similar efficacy and bleeding risk in the secondary prevention of VTE in patients with thrombophilia; with a low hazard ratio for recurrent VTE calculated from cohort studies for DOAC vs warfarin, ranging from 0.3 to 0.75. We wish to highlight that treatment failure is greater in those with severe forms of Protein S deficiency (below 20%), and possibly in AT deficiency Type II HBS homozygous Budapest 3. In summary, the current approach to using DOACs in patients with severe thrombophilia is dependent on clinical judgment and experience. Limited evidence suggests that for those with severe thrombophilias, full dose DOACs have similar utility as VKAs. We recommend caution in using low - dose DOACs due to lack of evidence. Ideally large randomized multicenter studies are required to develop a reliable treatment algorithm.

Structured diabetes care routines in cardiac rehabilitation are associated with increased diabetes detection and improved treatment after myocardial infarction: a nationwide observational study.

BACKGROUND: Despite the detrimental impact of abnormal glucose metabolism on cardiovascular prognosis after myocardial infarction (MI), diabetes is both underdiagnosed and undertreated. We investigated associations between structured diabetes care routines in cardiac rehabilitation (CR) and detection and treatment of diabetes at one-year post-MI. METHODS: Center-level data was derived from the Perfect-CR survey, which evaluated work routines applied at Swedish CR centers (n = 76). Work routines involving diabetes care included: (1) routine assessment of fasting glucose and/or HbA1c, (2) routine use of oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), (3) having regular case rounds with diabetologists, and (4) whether glucose-lowering medication was adjusted by CR physicians. Patient-level data was obtained from the national MI registry SWEDEHEART (n = 7601, 76% male, mean age 62.6 years) and included all post-MI patients irrespective of diabetes diagnosis. Using mixed-effects regression we estimated differences between patients exposed versus. not exposed to the four above-mentioned diabetes care routines. Outcomes were newly detected diabetes and the proportion of patients receiving oral glucose-lowering medication at one-year post-MI. RESULTS: Routine assessment of fasting glucose/HbA1c was performed at 63.2% (n = 48) of the centers, while 38.2% (n = 29) reported using OGTT for detecting glucose abnormalities. Glucose-lowering medication adjusted by CR physicians (n = 13, 17.1%) or regular case rounds with diabetologists (n = 7, 9.2%) were less frequently reported. In total, 4.0% of all patients (n = 304) were diagnosed with diabetes during follow-up and 17.9% (n = 1361) were on oral glucose-lowering treatment one-year post-MI. Routine use of OGTT was associated with a higher rate of newly detected diabetes at one-year (risk ratio [95% confidence interval]: 1.62 [1.26, 1.98], p = 0.0007). At one-year a higher proportion of patients were receiving oral glucose-lowering medication at centers using OGTT (1.22 [1.07, 1.37], p = 0.0046) and where such medication was adjusted by CR physicians (1.31 [1.06, 1.56], p = 0.0155). Compared to having none of the structured diabetes care routines, the more routines implemented the higher the rate of newly detected diabetes (from 0 routines: 2.7% to 4 routines: 6.3%; p for trend = 0.0014). CONCLUSIONS: Having structured routines for diabetes care implemented within CR can improve detection and treatment of diabetes post-MI. A cluster-randomized trial is warranted to ascertain causality.

Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators Among Older Survivors of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.

BACKGROUND: Although current guidelines recommend implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) placement in survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, contemporary data on secondary-prevention ICDs in survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest remain limited. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using 2013 to 2019 CARES (Cardiac Arrest Registry to Enhance Survival) linked to Medicare, we identified 3226 patients aged ≥65 years with an initial shockable rhythm who survived to discharge without severe neurological disability. Multivariable hierarchical regression models were used to examine the association between patient variables and ICD placement and quantify hospital variation in ICD implantation. The mean age was 72.2 years, 23.5% were women, 10% were Black individuals, and 4% were Hispanic individuals. Overall, 997 (30.9%) patients received an ICD before discharge, 1266 (39.2%) at 90 days, and 1287 (39.9%) within 6 months. Older age (≥85 years), female sex, history of diabetes, calendar year, and presentation with acute myocardial infarction were associated with lower odds of ICD implantation, but race or ethnicity was not associated with ICD implantation. Among 297 hospitals, the median proportion of survivors receiving ICD at discharge was 28.6% (interquartile range, 20%-50%). The relative odds of ICD implantation varied by 62% across hospitals (median odds ratio, 1.62 [95% CI, 1.38-1.82]) after adjusting for case mix. CONCLUSIONS: Fewer than 1 in 3 survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest due to a shockable rhythm received a secondary-prevention ICD before discharge. Although patient variables were associated with ICD implantation, there was no difference by race or ethnicity. Even after adjusting for patient case mix, ICD implantation varied markedly across hospitals.

Impact of Implementation of a Region-Wide Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Management Clinical Pathway for the Secondary Prevention of Acute Myocardial Infarction.

BACKGROUND: Aggressive lipid-lowering therapy is important for secondary prevention of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The recommended target for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) of <70 mg/dL is often not achieved. To address this gap, we implemented a clinical pathway in all hospitals that perform percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) with primary care physicians in Nagasaki and aimed to validate the effectiveness of this pathway in an acute setting. METHODS AND RESULTS: This retrospective cohort study included medical records extracted from 8 hospitals in Nagasaki, Japan, where PCI was performed for patients with AMI. The index date was defined as the date of hospitalization for AMI between July 1, 2021, and February 28, 2023. The primary outcome was the rate of achieving LDL-C <70 mg/dL at discharge. The median baseline LDL-C level at admission was 121 mg/dL (n=226) in the pre-implementation group and 116 mg/dL (n=163) in the post-implementation group. In the post-implementation group, 131 patients were treated using the clinical pathway. The rate of achieving LDL-C <70 mg/dL at discharge increased significantly from 37.2% before implementation to 54.6% after implementation. Logistic regression analysis revealed a positive correlation between the implementation of the clinical pathway and achieving LDL-C <70 mg/dL. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a region-wide clinical pathway for LDL-C management significantly improved the rate of intensive lipid-lowering therapy and the achievement of LDL-C targets.

[Association between the uptake rates of countermeasure-type colorectal cancer screening, new cancer detection indices, and number of municipal public health nurses: An ecological study].

Objective　We conducted an ecological analysis of the structures and processes of municipalities implementing countermeasure-type colorectal cancer screening services, which are associated with high mortality and morbidity rates. We analyzed the populations' demographic characteristics, number of public health nurses (PHNs), and human base for such services. The process was evaluated using the screening uptake rates for countermeasure-type cancer screening and detection indices.Methods　The data included municipal population figures, areas, and national health insurance enrolments, all sourced from a government statistics portal (e-Stat). We obtained the number of PHNs per 100,000 population from PHN activity area surveys, information on municipal colorectal cancer screening from public health centers (PHCs) and health promotion project reports, and cancer detection indices from the National Cancer Registry data. The analysis covered 1,234 municipalities with populations of ≥10,000 and ≥50,000, categorized into three groups based on the presence of PHCs. The internal structures were compared using multiple regression analysis.Results　The number of PHNs per 100,000 population was categorized as follows; <50,000 population group (42.9), ≥50,000 population group (24.3), and PHC-present city group (16.4).Among these groups, the mass and individual screening rates were 96.2% and 47.7%, 69.1% and 91.5%, and 83.7% and 69.9%, respectively. The average uptake rates of countermeasure-type screenings and detailed examinations were 10.6-13.7% and 68.4-75.3%, respectively. In both cases, the <50,000 population and PHC-present city groups exhibited high and low values, respectively. However, the proportion of patients with "early cancer" detection was approximately 42% in all groups.Multiple regression analysis, using the countermeasure-type screening uptake rate and colorectal cancer detection indices as dependent variables, revealed that in the <50,000 population group, in which mass screening was prevalent, the number of PHNs was significantly positively correlated with the countermeasure-type screening uptake rate and proportion of "new cancers" detected by screening.Contrastingly, the PHC-present city group showed no correlation between the number of PHNs and countermeasure-type screening uptake rate, but a highly detailed examination uptake rate was significantly positively correlated with the proportion of "early cancer" detection.Conclusion　In municipalities without PHCs, countermeasure-type screening uptake rates, particularly mass screening rates, were positively correlated with the number of PHNs and cancer detection indices. In cities with PHCs, in which individual screening was prevalent, the detailed examination uptake rate through countermeasure-type screening was correlated with detection indices.

Early statin use is associated with improved survival and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation and recent ischaemic stroke: A propensity-matched analysis of a global federated health database.

INTRODUCTION: Statins reduce recurrent stroke and cardiovascular events in patients with non-cardioembolic stroke. The benefits of statins in patients with AF and recent IS remain unclear. We aimed to investigate the benefits of statins in patients with AF and recent IS. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective, cohort study was conducted using deidentified electronic medical records within TriNetX platform. Patients with AF and recent IS, who received statins within 28 days of their index stroke were propensity score-matched with those who did not. Patients were followed up for up to 2 years. Primary outcomes were the 2-year risk of recurrent IS, all-cause mortality and the composite outcome of all-cause mortality, recurrent IS, transient ischaemic attack (TIA), and acute myocardial infarction (MI). Secondary outcomes were the 2-year risk of TIA, intracranial haemorrhage (ICH), acute MI, and hospital readmission. Cox regression analyses were used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). RESULTS: Of 20,902 patients with AF and recent IS, 7500 (35.9%) received statins within 28 days of their stroke and 13,402 (64.1%) did not. 11,182 patients (mean age 73.7 ± 11.5; 5277 (47.2%) female) remained after propensity score matching. Patients who received early statins had significantly lower risk of recurrent IS (HR: 0.45, 95%CI: 0.41-0.48, p < 0.001), mortality (HR: 0.75, 95%CI: 0.66-0.84, p < 0.001), the composite outcome (HR: 0.48, 95%CI: 0.45-0.52, p < 0.001), TIA (HR: 0.37, 95%CI: 0.30-0.44, p < 0.001), ICH (HR: 0.59, 95%CI: 0.47-0.72, p < 0.001 ), acute MI (HR: 0.35, 95%CI: 0.30-0.42, p < 0.001) and hospital readmission (HR: 0.46, 95%CI: 0.42-0.50, <0.001). Beneficial effects of early statins were evident in the elderly, different ethnic groups, statin dose intensity, and AF subtypes, large vessel occlusion and embolic strokes and within the context of statin lipophilicity, optimal LDL-cholesterol levels, various cardiovascular comorbidities, treatment with intravenous thrombolysis or endovascular thrombectomy, and NIHSS 0-5 and NIHSS > 5 subgroups. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Patients with AF and recent IS, who received early statins, had a lower risk of recurrent stroke, death, and other cardiovascular outcomes including ICH, compared to those who did not.

Do sex and gender aspects influence non-adherence to secondary prevention measures after myocardial infarction?

Objective: This study aimed to determine the prevalence of non-adherence to preventive interventions, its clinical consequences, and factors associated with non-adherence to secondary prevention measures, with a special emphasis on sex and gender. Methods: Prospective observational study of patients hospitalized for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in whom an evaluation of adherence to medication, Mediterranean diet, physical activity, and cardiac rehabilitation was performed after 6 and 12 months, with systematic assessment of predictors including patient-, disease-, psychological-, social-, and gender-related factors using self-administered questionnaires. Results: Of 503 patients included, 101 (20,1%) were females. At one year, 85% of patients did not adhere to at least one of the recommendations with no differences between females and males. However, two factors more frequent in females, caregiver burden (adjusted OR, 1.45; 95%CI, 1.08-1.94) and depressive symptoms (adjusted OR, 1.40; 95%CI, 1.03-1.92) predicted non-adherence to all measures together. Chronic kidney disease (aOR, 3.24; 95%CI, 1.02-10.48) and being female (aOR, 2.21; 95%CI, 1.18-4.13) were associated with non-adherence to the Mediterranean diet; diabetes with organ damage (aOR, 12.06; 95%CI, 1.93-7.69) and older age (aOR, 0.96 per year; 95%CI, 0.93-0.99), among others, with physical activity; and higher body mass index with cardiac rehabilitation participation (aOR, 1.07; 95%CI, 1.002-1.14) and completion (aOR, 1.14; 95%CI, 1.03-1.26). Conclusion: Adherence to all secondary prevention measures after AMI remains very low and is associated with several gender-related factors. Multidisciplinary intervention strategies targeting the most vulnerable patient groups, such as females or patients with diabetes, obesity, chronic kidney disease, or depression, are warranted.

Barriers to adherence to secondary prevention therapy in patients with ischemic heart disease: a cross-sectional study of a Mexican reference center.

Objective: This article aims to assess the adherence level to second-line therapy for cardiovascular prevention in a tertiary hospital in Mexico City and identify key barriers to adequate pharmacological adherence. Methods: A single-center prospective cross-sectional study was conducted between August 2018 and February 2020. Sociodemographic data were collected, and the Morisky medication adherence scale was performed. Directed interviews during medical consultations were also conducted to determine reasons for non-adherence. Results: Showed that out of 991 patients included with a median age of 65 (58.72) years, 70.3% exhibited inadequate adherence, with forgetfulness being the most common reason (55.4%). Patients receiving combined therapy with coronary revascularization showed higher adherence compared to those on optimal medical therapy alone. Low educational level (OR 1.68, IC 95% 1.23-2.23, p = 0.0001) and the use of optimal medical therapy alone (OR 1.2, I 95% 1.11-2.007 p = 0.007) were identified as predictors of poor adherence. Conclusion: Among patients with ischemic heart disease and pharmacological therapy for secondary prevention, inadequate adherence is observed in 70% of cases. Factors associated with poor pharmacological adherence were low educational level and prescription of medical therapy without revascularization.

Objetivo: Determinar el nivel de adherencia a la terapia secundaria de prevención cardiovascular en un hospital terciario de la Ciudad de México e identificar las barreras que contribuyen a la inadecuada adherencia farmacológica. Métodos: Se realizó un estudio transversal entre agosto de 2018 y febrero de 2020. Se obtuvieron los datos sociodemográficos, la escala de adherencia a la medicación de Morisky, y se realizó una entrevista sobre las razones de la no adherencia. Resultados: 991 pacientes fueron incluidos con una mediana de edad de 65 (58,72) años. La adherencia inadecuada fue de 70.3%, siendo el olvido la causa más frecuente (55.4%). Aquellos pacientes en terapia farmacológica combinada con revascularización coronaria fueron más adherentes que aquellos en terapia médica óptima. El bajo nivel educativo (OR 1.68, IC95%1.23-2.3, p = 0.001) y el uso de tratamiento médico óptimo solo (OR 1.52, IC95%1.11-2.07, p = 0.007) fueron predictores de mala adherencia. Conclusión: En pacientes con cardiopatia isquemica y terapia farmacológica para prevención secundaria se observa adherencia inadecuada en 70%. Los factores asociados a mala adherencia farmacológica fueron el bajo nivel educativo y la prescripción de tratamiento médico sin revascularización.

Apolipoprotein A-I Infusions and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Acute Myocardial Infarction According to Baseline LDL-Cholesterol Levels: The AEGIS-II Trial.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: In the AEGIS-II trial (NCT03473223), CSL112, a human apolipoprotein A1 derived from plasma that increases cholesterol efflux capacity, did not significantly reduce the risk of the primary endpoint through 90 days versus placebo after acute myocardial infarction (MI). Nevertheless, given the well-established relationship between higher low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and plaque burden, as well as greater risk reductions seen with PCSK9 inhibitors in patients with baseline LDL-C ≥100 mg/dL on statin therapy, the efficacy of CSL112 may be influenced by baseline LDL-C. METHODS: Overall, 18,219 patients with acute MI, multivessel coronary artery disease, and additional risk factors were randomized to either four weekly infusions of 6 g CSL112 or placebo. This exploratory post-hoc analysis evaluated cardiovascular outcomes by baseline LDL-C in patients prescribed guideline-directed statin therapy at the time of randomization (n=15,731). RESULTS: As baseline LDL-C increased, risk of the primary endpoint at 90 days lowered in those treated with CSL112 compared with placebo. In patients with LDL-C ≥100 mg/dL at randomization, there was a significant risk reduction of cardiovascular death, MI, or stroke in the CSL112 vs. placebo group at 90, 180, and 365 days (hazard ratio 0.69 [0.53-0.90], 0.71 [0.57-0.88], and 0.78 [0.65-0.93]). In contrast, there was no difference between treatment groups among those with LDL-C <100 mg/dL at baseline. CONCLUSIONS: In this population, treatment with CSL112 compared to placebo was associated with a significantly lower risk of recurrent cardiovascular events among patients with a baseline LDL-C ≥100 mg/dL. Further studies need to confirm that CSL112 efficacy is influenced by baseline LDL-C.