Integrative analysis reveals different feature of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma subtypes.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) has two main histological subtypes: large and small duct-type iCCA, which are characterized by different clinicopathological features. This study was conducted with the purpose of expanding our understanding of their differences in molecular features and immune microenvironment. METHODS: We selected 132 patients who underwent radical surgery at our department between 2015 and 2021 for clinical and survival analyses. Whole-exome sequencing was performed to analyse mutational landscapes. Bulk RNA sequencing and single-cell RNA sequencing data were used for pathway enrichment and immune infiltration analyses based on differentially expressed genes. The function of PPP1R1B was analysed both in vitro and in vivo and the gene mechanism was further investigated. RESULTS: We found that large duct-type iCCA had worse overall survival and recurrence-free survival rates than small duct-type iCCA. Mutations in ARID1A, DOT1L and ELF3 usually occur in large duct-type iCCA, whereas mutations in IDH1 and BAP1 occur in small duct-type iCCA. Among the differentially expressed genes, we found that PPP1R1B was highly expressed in large duct-type iCCA tumour tissues. Expression of PPP1R1B promoted cell proliferation, migration and invasion and indicated a worse prognosis. A combination of USF2 with the promoter of PPP1R1B can enhance gene expression in iCCA, which may further affect the expression of genes such as AHNAK, C4BPA and activating the PI3K/AKT pathway. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings extend our understanding of large and small duct-type iCCA. In addition, PPP1R1B may serve as a potential marker and therapeutic target for large duct-type iCCA.

Surgical interpretation of the WHO subclassification of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a narrative review.

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) has been subclassified by its gross morphology into the mass-forming (MF), periductal-infiltrating (PI), and intraductal growth (IG) types and their combinations. This classification correlates well with clinical features; for example, MF-iCCA has less lymph-node metastasis and a better prognosis than PI-iCCA. According to the recently accumulated evidence from histological investigations, the WHO classification endorsed a subclassification scheme in which iCCA cases are classified into small- and large-duct types. Small-duct iCCA is considered to originate from septal or smaller bile ducts and is characterized by less frequent lymph-node metastasis, a favorable prognosis, and an MF appearance. Large-duct iCCA arises around the second branch of the biliary tree and has more aggressive biology and distinct genetic abnormalities. According to the practice guidelines for iCCA from the Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, upfront surgery is recommended for iCCA without distant metastasis regardless of the morphological subtype, based on clinical experience. In consideration of the biological heterogeneity of iCCA, the treatment strategy for iCCA needs to be reconsidered based on the WHO subtypes.

Expression of fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (FGFR2) in combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: clinicopathological study.

Genetic alterations including fusions in fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (FGFR2) are detected in 10-20% of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA), and FGFR2 inhibitors are effective for the treatment of iCCA. We examined a prevalence of FGFR2 genetic alterations and their clinicopathological significance in combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CCA). FGFR2 expression, which is a surrogate marker for FGFR2 genetic alterations, was immunohistochemically assessed in the liver sections from 75 patients with cHCC-CCA, 35 with small duct-type iCCA, 30 with large duct-type iCCA, and 35 with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). FGFR2 genetic alterations were detected by reverse transcription-PCR and direct sequence. An association of FGFR2 expression with clinicopathological features was investigated in cHCC-CCAs. FGFR2 expression was detected in significantly more patients with cHCC-CCA (21.3%) and small duct-type iCCA (25.7%), compared to those with large duct-type iCCA (3.3%) and HCC (0%) (p < 0.05). FGFR2-positive cHCC-CCAs were significantly smaller size (p < 0.05), with more predominant cholangiolocarcinoma component (p < 0.01) and less nestin expression (p < 0.05). Genetic alterations of ARID1A and BAP1 and multiple genes were significantly more frequent in FGFR2-positive cHCC-CCAs (p < 0.05). 5'/3' imbalance in FGFR2 genes indicating exon18-truncated FGFR2 was significantly more frequently detected in FGFR2-positive cHCC-CCAs and small duct iCCAs, compared to FGFR2-negative ones (p < 0.05). FGFR2::BICC fusion was detected in a case of cHCC-CCAs. FGFR2 genetic alterations may be prevalent in cHCC-CCAs as well as small duct-type iCCAs, which suggest cHCC-CCAs may also be a possible therapeutic target of FGFR2 inhibitors.

Impact of Tumor Subclassifications for Identifying an Appropriate Surgical Strategy in Patients with Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is subclassified into small and large duct types. The impact of these subclassifications for identifying appropriate surgical strategies remains unclear. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study included 118 patients with ICC who underwent liver resection. Based on the pathological examination results, the participants were divided into the small duct-type ICC group (n = 64) and large duct-type ICC group (n = 54). The clinicopathological features and postoperative outcomes were compared between the two groups to investigate the impact of subclassification for selecting appropriate surgical strategies. RESULTS: Ten patients in the small duct-type ICC group had synchronous or metachronous hepatocellular carcinoma. The large duct-type ICC group had higher proportions of patients who underwent major hepatectomy, extrahepatic bile duct resection, portal vein resection, and lymph node sampling or dissection than the small duct-type ICC group. The large duct-type ICC group had significantly higher incidences of lymph node metastasis/recurrence and pathological major vessel invasion than the other. The small duct-type ICC group exhibited significantly higher recurrence-free and overall survival rates than the large duct-type ICC group. Further, the large duct-type ICC group had a significantly higher incidence of lymph node metastasis/recurrence than the small duct-type ICC at the perihilar region group. CONCLUSIONS: Suitable surgical strategies may differ between the small and large duct-type ICCs. In patients with large duct-type ICCs, hepatectomy with lymph node dissection and/or biliary reconstruction should be considered, whereas hepatectomy without these advanced procedures can be suggested for patients with small duct-type ICCs.

Nestin may be a candidate marker for differential diagnosis between small duct type and large duct type intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas.

BACKGROUNDS/AIMS: Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) is subclassified into small and large duct types. These two subtypes show distinct differences in various clinicopathological features and possible cell origin and pathways of carcinogenesis, however, a differential diagnosis may be sometimes difficult. Given the type IV intermediate filament, Nestin, may be a candidate diagnostic marker for combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CCA) and small duct type iCCAs, the significance of nestin as a differential diagnostic marker between small and large duct types of iCCAs was addressed in the present study. METHODS: Nestin expression was immunohistochemically assessed in the sections from 36 patients with small duct-type iCCA, 30 with large duct-type iCCA, and 27 with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (CCA). Nestin expression and its relationship with clinicopathological features and genetic alterations were investigated in small duct type iCCAs. RESULTS: Nestin expression was detected in 17 small duct type iCCAs (47.2%), one large duct type iCCA (3.8%) and zero extrahepatic CCA. Nestin expression was significantly more frequent in the patients with small duct type iCCAs than in those with large duct type iCCA and extrahepatic CCA (p < 0.01). In 10 liver biopsies, all samples with nestin expression were small duct type iCCAs. Nestin-positive small duct type iCCAs were characterized by a higher histological grade, compared to Nestin-negative small duct type iCCAs (p < 0.01). Nestin-positive small duct type iCCAs tended to have 2 or more genetic alterations, but there was no statistic difference (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Different nestin expression may reflect differences between small duct type iCCA and large duct type/extrahepatic CCA and may be a useful diagnostic marker for small duct type iCCAs.

Challenges in Diagnosing and Reporting Cholangiocarcinoma.

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is a challenge to the practicing surgical pathologist for several reasons. It is rare in many parts of the world, and thus practical exposure may be limited. Related to the fact of its rarity is the fact that more common tumors which frequently metastasize to the liver can be morphologically indistinguishable (eg, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma). Immunohistochemical testing is generally non-contributory in this context. Other difficulties arise from the protean morphologic manifestations of cholangiocarcinoma (ie, small duct vs. large duct) and the existence of combined cholangiocarcinoma and hepatocellular carcinoma. These, and other issues of concern to the practicing diagnostic pathologist are discussed herein.

Bile duct adenoma and small-sized small duct type intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma show distinct differences in genetic alterations, expression of IMP3 and EZH2 and stromal and inflammatory components.

AIMS: Given that bile duct adenoma was significantly more prevalent in the liver with small duct type intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (small duct iCCA), compared to other primary liver carcinomas, we examined the possibility of bile duct adenoma as a precursor of small duct iCCA by analysing genetic alterations and other features in bile duct adenomas. METHODS AND RESULTS: Subjects included 33 bile duct adenomas and 17 small-sized (up to 2 cm in diameter) small duct iCCAs. Genetic alterations were examined by direct sequencing for hot-spot regions and immunohistochemical staining. The expression of p16INK4a , EZH2 and IMP3 and stromal and inflammatory components were also examined. Genetic alterations examined including BRAF were not detected in bile duct adenomas, whereas genetic alterations of p53 (47%), ARID1A (41%), PBRM1 (12%), MTAP (12%), IDH1 (6%), KRAS (6%) and TERT promoter (6%) were detected in 16 small-sized small duct iCCA (94%) (P < 0.01). The expression of IMP3 and EZH2 was not detected in bile duct adenomas, whereas it was detected in most small duct iCCA (94%) (P < 0.01). Immature stroma and neutrophilic infiltration were significantly more prevalent in small duct iCCA, compared to bile duct adenoma (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Bile duct adenomas and small-sized small duct iCCAs show distinct differences in genetic alterations, expression of IMP3 and EZH2 and stromal and inflammatory components. There was no evidence suggesting that bile duct adenoma is a precursor of small duct iCCA. Immunohistochemical staining for IMP3, EZH2, p53, ARID1A and MTAP may be useful for differential diagnosis between bile duct adenomas and small duct iCCAs.

Clinicopathological, etiological and molecular characteristics of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma subtypes classified by mucin production and immunohistochemical features.

BACKGROUND: Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) can be divided into two morphological subtypes: large duct type and small duct type ICC. This study aims to verify the feasibility of the classification criteria and clinicopathological characteristics of ICC. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: ICC patients were divided into the large and small type ICC by morphological and immunohistochemical patterns. Subsequently, clinicopathological data of the two groups was compared and the multivariate COX regression was used to verify the clinical significance of ICC subtypes. In addition, IDH1/2 mutation, KRAS mutation and FGFR2 translocation was also evaluated. RESULTS: Totally, 32, 61 and 13 tumors were defined as large, small and the indeterminate-duct type ICC respectively. Clinicopathologically, the large and small duct type ICC showed distinct morphological features. Compared with the small duct type ICC, the large duct type ICC had higher levels of serum tumor markers, vascular invasion, lymph node metastasis, and postoperative recurrence. Furthermore, positive FGFR2 rearrangement occurred only in small duct type ICC and IDH1/2 was mutated mainly in small duct type ICC. CONCLUSIONS: The subclassification system was applicable and the ICC subtypes had distinct clinicopathological characteristics, prognostic outcome, and IDH1/2 mutation pattern.

Integrative Analysis of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma Subtypes for Improved Patient Stratification: Clinical, Pathological, and Radiological Considerations.

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas (iCCAs) may be subdivided into large and small duct types that differ in etiology, molecular alterations, therapy, and prognosis. Therefore, the optimal iCCA subtyping is crucial for the best possible patient outcome. In our study, we analyzed 148 small and 84 large duct iCCAs regarding their clinical, radiological, histological, and immunohistochemical features. Only 8% of small duct iCCAs, but 27% of large duct iCCAs, presented with initial jaundice. Ductal tumor growth pattern and biliary obstruction were significant radiological findings in 33% and 48% of large duct iCCAs, respectively. Biliary epithelial neoplasia and intraductal papillary neoplasms of the bile duct were detected exclusively in large duct type iCCAs. Other distinctive histological features were mucin formation and periductal-infiltrating growth pattern. Immunohistochemical staining against CK20, CA19-9, EMA, CD56, N-cadherin, and CRP could help distinguish between the subtypes. To summarize, correct subtyping of iCCA requires an interplay of several factors. While the diagnosis of a precursor lesion, evidence of mucin, or a periductal-infiltrating growth pattern indicates the diagnosis of a large duct type, in their absence, several other criteria of diagnosis need to be combined.

Is nestin a diagnostic marker for combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma?

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The type IV intermediate filament, nestin, may be a candidate diagnostic marker for combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CCA). Therefore, the significance of nestin as a diagnostic marker for cHCC-CCA categorized by the World Health Organization (WHO) 2019 classification and its relationship with clinicopathological features were examined in the present study. METHODS AND RESULTS: Nestin expression was immunohistochemically assessed in the liver sections from 75 patients with cHCC-CCA, 22 with small duct-type intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA), 20 with large duct-type iCCA and 35 with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Nestin expression and its relationship with clinicopathological features and genetic alterations were investigated in cHCC-CCA. Nestin expression was detected in significantly more patients with cHCC-CCA (66.7%) than in those with large duct-type iCCA (5%) (P < 0.01), HCC (2.9%) (P < 0.01) and small duct-type iCCA (40.9%) (P < 0.05). Nestin expression was partly associated with neural cell adhesion molecule (NCAM) and vimentin expression. Nestin expression was also observed in significantly more patients with small duct-type iCCA than in those with large duct-type iCCA and HCC (P < 0.01). Nestin-positive cHCC-CCA was characterized by a smaller tumour size, the more frequent presence of cholangiolocellular carcinoma (CLC) components, a higher rate of p53 overexpression and a higher rate of multiple genetic alterations (P < 0.05). Furthermore, p53 overexpression was associated with a higher histological grade and multiple genetic alterations (P < 0.05) in nestin-positive cHCC-CCA. CONCLUSION: Nestin may be a useful diagnostic marker for a specific subgroup of cHCC-CCA and small duct-type iCCA associated with CLC components, p53 mutations and multiple genetic alterations, which are related to stemness and multipotent differentiation.

Protein-loss of SWI/SNF-complex core subunits influences prognosis dependent on histological subtypes of intra- and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is an aggressive malignancy with a 5-year-survival rate of <10%, mainly due to diagnosis in advanced stages and limited therapeutic options in case of progressive disease. Recently, evidence has indicated that alterations in the SWI/SNF-complex (SWI/SNF) may have an important role in the tumorigenesis of CCA. SWI/SNF-related chromatin remodeling has been reported to be crucial for differentiation and tumor suppression, and loss-of-function mutations of SWI/SNF are present in 20% of human malignancies; however, at present, little is known about its relevance in CCA. In the present study, a cohort of 52 patients with the diagnosis of primary CCA was retrospectively collected. All patients underwent surgery with curative intent. Tissue microarray analysis was performed on each tumor for immunohistochemical loss-of-protein analysis of the SWI/SNF core subunits ARID1A, INI-1, BRG1, PBRM-1 and BRM, corresponding to the following CCA subtypes: Extrahepatic CCA (ECCA), small duct or large duct intrahepatic CCA (ICCA). Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to determine survival distribution and survival differences were evaluated by log-rank test. In total, 14 of 52 patients (~35%) exhibited protein-loss of any tested SWI/SNF core subunit. Notably, 17% of patients exhibited a loss of ARID1a; this was the protein loss with the highest frequency. Patients with small and large duct ICCA with protein-loss of any tested SWI/SNF subunit exhibited significantly worse survival compared with the wild-type cohort with proficient protein expression (P=0.013 and P=0.002), whereas no significant survival difference was detected for patients with ECCA. SWI/SNF and its core subunits may be considered promising predictive and therapeutic targets, and require further investigation in patients with CCA.

Bile duct adenoma may be a precursor lesion of small duct type intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Precursor lesions of small duct type intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (small duct iCCA) have not been clarified so far. We hypothesised that precursor lesions may be frequently distributed in the background liver of small duct iCCA. METHODS AND RESULTS: We determined by histology the presence of bile duct adenomas and von Meyenburg complexes as candidate precursor lesions in the background liver of small duct iCCA, with other primary liver carcinomas as control. Subjects included 28 patients with small duct iCCA, 29 with large duct iCCAs, 60 with combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (Comb) and 40 with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The prevalence of bile duct adenomas in the background liver was significantly higher in small duct iCCA (35.7%) compared to other primary liver carcinomas (Comb, 4.9%; 10%, HCC) (P < 0.01). The prevalence of bile duct adenomas was significantly associated with the presence of von Meyenburg complexes and ductal plate malformation-like patterns in small duct iCCAs and Combs. Von Meyenburg complexes were detected in 11 small duct iCCA (39.3%), five large duct iCCAs (17.2%), 10 Comb (16.4%) and 13 HCC (33.3%), respectively (P > 0.05). Small duct iCCAs showed altered expression of ARID1A (46.4%), p53 (39.3%), PBRM1 (14.3%), IMP3 (85.7%) and EZH2 (82.1%), whereas these markers were negative in bile duct adenomas. CONCLUSION: Bile duct adenomas may be precursor lesions of small duct iCCAs. Alteration of ARID1A, p53 or PBRM1 may be involved in the carcinogenesis of small duct iCCAs.

Distinct clinical and prognostic implication of IDH1/2 mutation and other most frequent mutations in large duct and small duct subtypes of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Isocitrate dehydrogenase 1/2 (IDH1/2), BAP1, ARID1A and PBRM1 have been reported as the most frequent mutant genes in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC), and their relationships with clinicopathological features and prognosis were researched in this study. METHODS: We collected clinical data of 130 ICC patients from January 2012 to December 2017. The IDH1/2 mutation and loss of BAP1, ARID1A and PBRM1 expressions were detected by DNA sequencing or immunohistochemical methods, and histological subtype of ICCs was determined by hematoxylin-eosin, Alcian blue and S100P staining. RESULTS: IDH1/2 mutation was related to decreased preoperative serum total bilirubin (P = 0.039), ferritin (P = 0.000) and higher histological differentiation (P = 0.024), and was associated with prolonged disease-free survival (P = 0.009) and a trend toward increased overall survival (P = 0.126) in small duct type of ICCs. Immunohistochemical staining results of MsMab-1 were generally consistent with DNA sequencing for IDH1/2 mutant in ICCs (κ = 0.691). Only BAP1 expression loss was correlated to prolonged disease-free survival (P = 0.031) and overall survival (P = 0.041) in large duct type of ICCs. CONCLUSIONS: IDH1/2 mutation is a favorable predictor and may be related to iron metabolism in small duct type of ICCs. Furthermore, we suggest that the detection of IDH1/2 mutation is indispensable to determine targeted therapy in small duct type ICCs, while it is not necessary in large duct of ICCs. MsMab-1 is a relatively effective multi-specific antibody against IDH1/2 mutant in ICCs. BAP1 expression loss was correlated with improved prognosis only in large duct type ICCs.