Urban dog densities reveal environmental inequities in Santiago, Chile.

Dogs can negatively affect the wellbeing of people and nature, but if this changes along a socioeconomic gradient, then social inequity might be at fault. Here, we identify environmental injustice at the city scale by modeling differences in the density of urban dog populations according to varying levels of socioeconomic development across municipalities of Chile's capital, Santiago. Our analysis demonstrates a strong relation between dog density and social inequity, specifically because dog density increases along with poverty, but decreases in municipalities with higher municipal income. We offer specific proposals to ameliorate and reverse this inequity. These results expose another aspect of the impacts people and nature are subjected to by dogs, adding a new social lens to address the dog problem worldwide.

Taxas de hospitalização, uso de biológicos e cirurgias em doenças inflamatórias intestinais: uma análise comparativa entre os sistemas público e privado de saúde em centro de referência da América Latina / Hospitalization, use of biologics and surgery rates in inflammatory bowel diseases: a single-centre comparative analysis between public and private healthcare systems in a tertiary unit from latin america

ABSTRACT Background: Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) have rising incidence and prevalence rates globally. In IBD, there are scarce stu­dies comparing differences between patients according to socioeconomic status. Our aim was to comparatively evaluate hospitalizations, use of biologics and rates of surgery in patients with IBD between public and private healthcare systems. Methods: Single-center retrospective cohort study in patients with IBD from a tertiary referral unit from Latin America, between 2015 and 2021. CD and UC patients were classified into two subgroups: public and private systems. Demographic characteristics, hospitalizations, need for surgery and biologics were compared. Results: A total of 500 patients were included, 322 with CD and 178 with UC. CD-related hospitalizations were frequently observed in both healthcare systems (76.28% in private and 67.46% in public). More than half of the patients had been submitted to one or more CD-related abdominal surgery, with no significant difference between the subgroups. Although there was no difference in the rates of use of biological therapy in CD subgroups, infliximab was more used in the public setting (57.69% vs 43.97%). There was no difference in UC-related hospitalizations between the subgroups (public 30.69% and private 37.66%) as well as the rates of colectomy (public: 16.83%, private: 19.48%). Biologics were prescribed almost twice as often in private as compared to public (45.45 vs 22.77%). Conclusion: There were no differences in the rates of hospitalization and abdominal surgery between the systems. In patients with UC, there was greater use of biological therapy in the private healthcare setting.

RESUMO Contexto: As doenças inflamatórias intestinais (DII) têm taxas crescentes de incidência e prevalência em todo o mundo. Na DII, são escassos os estudos comparando as diferenças entre os pacientes de acordo com o nível socioeconômico. Objetivo: Nosso objetivo foi avaliar comparativamente as hospitalizações, o uso de biológicos e as taxas de cirurgia em pacientes com DII entre os sistemas público e privado de saúde. Métodos: Estudo de coorte retrospectivo unicêntrico em pacientes com DII de uma unidade terciária de referência da América Latina, entre 2015 e 2021. Os pacientes com DC (doença de Crohn) e retocolite ulcerativa foram classificados em dois subgrupos: sistema público e privado. Características demográficas, hospitalizações, necessidade de cirurgia e biológicos foram comparadas. Resultados: Foram inclusos 500 pacientes, sendo 322 com DC e 178 com retocolite ulcerativa. Internações por DC foram frequentes em ambos os sistemas de saúde (76,28% na rede privada e 67,46% na rede pública). Mais da metade dos pacientes havia sido submetida a uma ou mais cirurgias abdominais relacionadas à DC, sem diferença significativa entre os subgrupos. Embora não tenha havido diferença nas taxas de uso de terapia biológica nos subgrupos de DC, o infliximabe foi mais utilizado no ambiente público (57,69% vs 43,97%). Não houve diferença nas internações relacionadas a retocolite ulcerativa entre os subgrupos (público 30,69% e privado 37,66%) e nas taxas de colectomia (público: 16,83%, privado: 19,48%). Os biológicos foram prescritos quase duas vezes mais no privado do que no público (45,45 vs 22,77%). Conclusão: Não houve diferença nas taxas de internação hospitalar e de cirurgia abdominal entre os sistemas. Nos pacientes com retocolite ulcerativa, houve maior utilização da terapia biológica no setor privado de saúde.

Changes in socioeconomic inequalities in food consumption among Brazilian adults in a 10-years period.

Objective: To evaluate changes in socioeconomic inequalities in food consumption in Brazil over a 10-year period. Methods: Data on 24-h recalls of adults (aged 20 years or more) from the 2008/9 (n = 26,327) and 2017/8 (n = 37,689). Brazilian Dietary Survey were analyzed. We used the Nova classification system to group food items and estimate the percentage of total energy from ultra-processed foods and plant-based natural or minimally processed foods. For sex and area of residence, we calculated the percentage points (p.p.) difference between the estimates for women and men, and rural and urban populations. Negative values indicate higher consumption among men or urban residents, positive values indicate higher consumption among women or rural residents, and zero indicates equality. For education and wealth levels we calculated the slope index of inequality (SII). The SII varies from -100 to 100, with positive values indicating higher consumption among more educated or wealthiest groups, negative values indicating higher consumption among less educated or poorest groups, and zero equality. Results: Over the period, we observed a reduction in the percentage of total energy from plant-based natural/minimally processed foods from 13.0 to 12.2% and an increase in that of ultra-processed foods from 17.0 to 18.3%. The urban population and those in the wealthier and more educated groups presented higher consumption of ultra-processed foods and lower consumption of plant-based natural/minimally processed foods in both survey years. Over the 10-year period, there was an overall reduction of the socioeconomic inequalities, mainly explained by the greater increase in ultra-processed food consumption by the rural population and those from the poorest and less educated groups (difference for area -7.2 p.p. in 2008/9 and -5.9 p.p. in 2017/8; SII for education 17.7 p.p. in 2008/9 and 13.8 p.p. in 2017/8; SII for wealth 17.0 p.p. in 2008/9 and 11.2 p.p. in 2017/8). Conclusion: Socioeconomic inequalities in food consumption decreased in Brazil, but it may lead to the overall deterioration of the dietary quality of the more vulnerable groups.

Municípios in the Time of Covid-19 in Brazil: Socioeconomic Vulnerabilities, Transmission Factors and Public Policies.

This paper aims at identifying the Covid-19 infection and mortality risk factors in Brazil during the pandemic's first wave. Three groups of variables are considered: socioeconomic and health vulnerabilities, factors related to the virus transmission channels (mobility and density) and the effects of the policy responses. The analysis at the level of all 5,570 municipalities, drawing on a matching of different statistical and administrative databases, returns three main results. First, structurally vulnerable populations are hardest hit-non-white, poor, in poor health, favela residents and informal workers-showing the impact of socioeconomic inequalities. Second, we highlight some policy repercussions. The Auxilio Emergencial (emergency cash transfer) has had a mitigating effect in communities with relatively more informal workers. Finally, Covid-19 has hit hardest in municipalities that are more pro-Bolsonaro. The president's rhetoric and attitudes may have prompted his supporters to adopt more risky behaviour, suffer the consequences and infect others. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1057/s41287-021-00487-w.

Cet article cherche à identifier les facteurs de risque de contracter le COVID-19 et d'en mourir durant la première vague de la pandémie au Brésil. Trois groupes de variables sont considérés : les facteurs socio-économiques et sanitaires, ceux liés aux canaux de transmission du virus (la mobilité et la densité) et les effets des réponses politiques. Réalisée sur l'ensemble des 5 570 municipalités et basée sur l'appariement de différentes bases de données statistiques et administratives, l'analyse fait ressortir trois principaux résultats. En premier lieu, les populations structurellement vulnérables sont les plus touchées ­ non-blancs, pauvres, de santé précaire, habitants des favelas, informels - renforçant l'effet des inégalités socioéconomiques. En deuxième lieu, nous mettons en évidence l'influence des politiques. L'Auxilio emergencial (transfert monétaire d'urgence) a un effet atténuateur dans les localités ayant relativement plus de travailleurs informels. Enfin, le CoVid-19 fait plus de ravages dans les municipalités plus favorables à Bolsonaro. Le discours du président induit ses partisans à adopter plus souvent des comportements à risque et à en subir les conséquences.

Socioeconomic inequalities in obesity in Brazil.

The aim of this work was to analyze the socioeconomic inequality in overweight and obesity for the Brazilian adult population and to determine the factors that contribute the most to the observed inequality. Data from the 2013 National Health Survey (Pesquisa Nacional de Saúde - PNS) were used and the inequality was calculated using the concentration index, which was decomposed to analyze the contribution of different factors (demographic, schooling, lifestyle, sanitation, among others). The analyses were stratified by gender and region, in order to identify some heterogeneity. The results for gender showed that the inequality in overweight and obesity in men is concentrated in the richest ones, whereas, for women, the indices did not show inequality. In the analyzes per region, the results showed the same pattern for men, and differences were found for women, suggesting that overweight is more concentrated in rich women in the less developed regions (North and Northeast) and in poor women in more developed regions (South, Southeast and Midwest). Income, demographics, schooling, and lifestyles are the factors that contributed most to the observed inequality. Public policy strategies should aim to reduce such persistence of overweight and obesity, but also seek equity and equality in health.

Trends in socioeconomic inequalities in stunting prevalence in Latin America and the Caribbean countries: differences between quintiles and deciles.

BACKGROUND: With the adoption of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), there is a renewed commitment of tackling the varied challenges of undernutrition, particularly stunting (SDG 2.2). Health equity is also a priority in the SDG agenda and there is an urgent need for disaggregated analyses to identify disadvantaged subgroups. We compared time trends in socioeconomic inequalities obtained through stratification by wealth quintiles and deciles for stunting prevalence. METHODS: We used 37 representative Demographic and Health Surveys and Multiple Indicator Cluster surveys from nine Latin American and Caribbean (LAC) countries conducted between 1996 and 2016. Stunting in children under-5 years was assessed according to the 2006 WHO Child Growth Standards and stratified by wealth quintiles and deciles. Within-country socioeconomic inequalities were measured through concentration index (CIX) and slope index of inequality (SII). We used variance-weighted least squares regression to estimate annual changes. RESULTS: Eight out of nine countries showed a statistical evidence of reduction in stunting prevalence over time. Differences between extreme deciles were larger than between quintiles in most of countries and at every point in time. However, when using summary measures of inequality, there were no differences in the estimates of SII with the use of deciles and quintiles. In absolute terms, there was a reduction in socioeconomic inequalities in Peru, Honduras, Dominican Republic, Belize, Suriname and Colombia. In relative terms, there was an increase in socioeconomic inequalities in Peru, Bolivia, Haiti, Honduras and Guatemala. CONCLUSIONS: LAC countries have made substantial progress in terms of reducing stunting,. Nevertheless, renewed actions are needed to improve equity. Particularly in those countries were absolute and relative inequalities did not change over time such Bolivia and Guatemala. Finer breakdowns in wealth distribution are expected to elucidate more differences between subgroups; however, this approach is relevant to cast light on those subgroups that are still lagging behind within populations and inform equity-oriented health programs and practices.