Not From Around Here: Evaluation of In-Person Interviews in an Urban General Surgery Residency Program.

OBJECTIVE: This study used a program evaluation approach to investigate the perceptions of utilizing in-person applicant interviews for a general surgery residency program. DESIGN: The study utilized de-identified data routinely collected during the residency program applicant interviews in the General Surgery Residency Program during the fall of 2023. Applicant and faculty/resident exit interview questionnaires were developed to evaluate perceptions of in-person interviewing; the questions were informed by domains for considering the appropriateness and feasibility of continuing in-person interviews as identified by the institution's Graduate Medical Education Committee. Applicants completed the survey at the end of their interview day; faculty and resident interviewers completed the survey following the applicant rank meeting. SETTING: The Sponsoring Institution approved a pilot transition from virtual to in-person interviews for the General Surgery Residency Program 2023 recruitment cycle. Surveys were completed electronically. PARTICIPANTS: Sixty-four applicants were interviewed and requested to complete the exit survey. The survey was completed by 55 (Response rate = 86%) program applicants and eight (Response rate = 100%) faculty and residents in the program. RESULTS: 49.1% of applicants indicated a preference for in-person interviews, 40.0% of applicants indicated a preference to choose and only 10.9% indicated a preference for virtual interviews. Applicants from out-of-state had a significantly higher preference for in-person interviews than those from in-state. Applicants and faculty interviewers perceived in-person interviews to provide a strong assessment of applicants. Applicants from out-of-state had a significantly higher confidence in their ability to demonstrate their strength and assess fit than those from in-state. CONCLUSIONS: While most applicants and faculty interviewers were generally comfortable with an in-person interviewing format, applicants from out-of-state had a particularly high preference for and perception of in-person interviews. General surgery residency programs and sponsoring institutions would benefit from the development of a comprehensive program evaluation strategies for their residency program interviews to make evidence-informed decisions about how best to structure interviews for their programs.

Optimizing modern surgical simulation through instructor feedback - insights from a retrospective observational study in a tertiary hospital.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic surgery is associated with a prolonged learning curve for emerging surgeons, and simulation-based training (SBT) has become increasingly prominent in this context due to stringent working time regulations and heightened concerns regarding patient safety. While SBT offers a safe and ethical learning environment, the accuracy of simulators in the context of evaluating surgical skills remains uncertain. This study aims to assess the precision of a laparoscopic simulator with regard to evaluating surgical performance and to identify the instructor's role in SBT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study focused on surgical residents in their 1st through 5th years at the Department of Surgery of Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital. The residents participated in a specially designed SBT program using the LapSim laparoscopic simulator. Following the training session, each resident was required to perform a laparoscopic procedure and received individualized feedback from an instructor. Both simulator and instructor evaluated trainees' performance on the LapSim, focusing on identifying correlations between the simulator's metrics and traditional assessments. RESULTS: Senior residents (n = 15), who employed more complex laparoscopic procedures, exhibited more significant improvements after receiving instructor feedback than did junior residents (n = 17). Notably, a stronger correlation between the simulator and instructor assessments was observed in the junior group (junior Global Operative Assessment of Laparoscopic Skills (GOALS) adjusted R2 = 0.285, p = 0.016), while no such correlations were observed among the senior group. CONCLUSION: A well-designed, step-by-step SBT can be a valuable tool in laparoscopic surgical training. LapSim simulator has demonstrated its potential in assessing surgical performances during the early stages of surgical training. However, instructors must provide intuitive feedback to ensure appropriate learning in later stages.

In the Era of pass/fail: Medical student perceptions on optimizing their surgical residency applications.

BACKGROUND: It is unclear how changes to the 2023-2024 Electronic Residency Application Service (ERAS) application will impact future applicants. We investigate students' perceptions about applying to residency during this transition period. METHODS: An anonymous electronic survey was sent to medical students through social media of a women's surgical society. Questions reflected aspects of the ERAS application. RESULTS: There were 415 responses, with 68 â€‹% planning to apply into surgical specialties (SS) and 17 â€‹% into non-surgical specialties (NSS). Compared with the NSS group, SS students reported decreased confidence in successfully matching, less attainable applicant expectations, and increased personal sacrifices to pursue their residency of interest. Students interested in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (PRS) placed 3-times more importance on the number of publications than General Surgery students. Away rotations were rated significantly more important for Otolaryngology, Orthopaedic, and PRS students. CONCLUSION: Students applying into surgical residencies experience unique stressors. Values among SS students differed across surgical subspecialties in preparation for the match. Further investigation characterizing the relationship between these values and characteristics of successful resident applicants is warranted.

The Impact of Surgical Training on Residents' Relationships and Life Choices.

OBJECTIVE: Our study investigated the effects of surgical training on residents' personal relationships. It aimed to address the gaps in understanding of how the surgical training commitment can influence relationship stability, decision-making, and life planning within this unique professional group. DESIGN: We used cross-sectional survey methodology to gather data on the intricacies of relationship dynamics amid the rigors of surgical training. The survey focused on marital status, relationship dynamics, personal life choices, the challenges and rewards of dual-healthcare relationships, and the support networks that individuals and couples rely on. SETTING: All surgical departments at The Johns Hopkins Hospital. PARTICIPANTS: The study comprised 111 participants, including residents, fellows, and attending surgeons. Of those reporting sex, 56/105 (53%) were female, and the predominant age category was 25 to 34 years, making up 61/104 (59%) of respondents. RESULTS: The majority (73/105, 70%) of respondents were or had been married, and 50/96 (52%) had partners in the medical field. Among those in a dual-healthcare relationship, 38/46 (83%) reported that their relationship was strengthened through understanding and empathy, yet 37/46 (80%) acknowledged complications in work-life balance. However, women were significantly more likely than men to report at least one negative effect of a dual-healthcare relationship (84% [16/19] versus 22% [6/27], p = .003). Among those with partners outside medicine, 39/46 (85%) acknowledged that their partner had to adjust their lifestyle significantly. A considerable number (73/92, 79%) postponed life events such as starting a family, and 57/85 (67%) experienced relationship strain due to long working hours. CONCLUSIONS: Residents in dual-healthcare couples derived support from their relationships, but surgical training placed a significant strain on residents' personal relationships and often prompted residents to postpone major life events such as starting a family. Enhanced support systems and targeted interventions are needed to assist surgical professionals in navigating the complexities of balancing a demanding career with personal life.

Gender-Based Differences in Medical Student Self-Ratings of Clinical Performance.

INTRODUCTION: While prior literature demonstrates gender-based differences in surgical residents' self-assessments, limited data exist examining these effects at the medical student level. This study aimed to understand how self-ratings of clinical performance differ across genders for clerkship students. METHODS: This was a retrospective study examining the results of an institutional Clinical Performance Examination administered at the end of the clerkship year. Students were tasked with obtaining a history and physical examination and developing an assessment and plan based on standardized patient cases. After the examination, students were asked to estimate the percentile rating of their performance. Female and male students' true scores, self-rated percentiles, and differences between true and self-rated percentiles were compared. RESULTS: One hundred twenty three male and 113 female medical students were included in the analysis. Female medical students performed statistically significantly better overall (79.65% versus 78.23%, P = 0.0039), in history skills (76.90% versus 75.19%, P = 0.012), and in communication skills (94.05% versus 92.58%, P = 0.0085). No statistically significant differences were seen between self-rated percentiles between male and female students. However, when comparing the difference between self-rated and true percentile scores (Δ = self-rated - true percentile), male students were more likely to rate themselves higher than their true percentile on history (male students Δ = 12.26 versus female students Δ = -1.24, P = 0.00076) and communication metrics (male students Δ = 14.12 versus female students Δ = 6.05, P = 0.037). CONCLUSIONS: Despite higher performance, female students rate themselves similarly to male medical students, suggesting a pattern of underestimation. Faculty must recognize that gender-based differences in self-evaluations begin at the medical student level, potentially impacting future trainee development.

Elevating Residency Match Success: The Potential Impact of a Home Program on the Surgical Match Rate.

INTRODUCTION: Home residency programs can provide medical students with opportunities for networking, mentorship, research, and exposure to surgeries. The goal of this project was to understand the potential impact of home surgical residencies on student match rates into specific surgical specialties. METHODS: This 5-year retrospective study (2019-2023) analyzed 12,916 matched applicants from 155 United States MD programs through publicly available match lists. Odds ratios (ORs) were used to determine the likelihood of students from institutions with home surgical residency programs (home programs) matching into desired surgical specialties compared to students from institutions without home programs. Additional variables included the Alpha Omega Alpha and the Gold Humanism Honor Society statuses of the medical school, the number of faculty, and the type of residency program. RESULTS: Of the matched applicants, 11,442 had home programs resulting in a 39.1% match rate into surgical specialties compared to a 22.3% match rate for students without a home program (OR: 1.76) (P < 0.001). Of the applicants with a home program compared to those without a home program, 69.2% matched into an academic residency (OR: 1.06), 7.7% matched into a community residency (OR: 0.90), 13.6% matched into a combined residency (OR: 0.95), and 2.5% matched into a military residency (OR: 1.31). CONCLUSIONS: Medical students graduating from institutions with home programs were 1.76 times more likely to match into a surgical residency program compared to those graduating from institutions without a home program. Future studies should look at how access to certain resources may influence a student's match rate.

Examining the Aftermath of Virtual Interviewing on Surgical Residency Matches.

INTRODUCTION: Residency interviews have traditionally been conducted in person; however, COVID-19 forced programs to shift to virtual interviewing. This study delineated the nationwide trends observed after virtual interviewing across multiple application cycles on both surgical residency applicant competitiveness and program workload. METHODS: Publicly available National Residency Matching Program applicant and program data were retrospectively reviewed. Applicant competitiveness was assessed using a validated competitive index (# positions ranked/match rate). Interview types included in-person (2010-2020) or virtual (2021-2023), and programs were classified as general surgery (GS), surgical subspecialty (SS) - orthopedics, otolaryngology and neurosurgery, and integrated specialty (IS) - plastic, thoracic, and vascular surgery. RESULTS: When comparing in-person to virtual cohorts, the competitive index has increased in GS (0.97 ± 0.00 to 1.05 ± 0.01, P < 0.001), SS (0.97 ± 0.02 to 1.06 ± 0.01 P < 0.001), and IS (0.93 ± 0.06 to 1.12 ± 0.03, P = 0.001). United Sates Medical Licensing Examination Step scores and research experiences increased over time in GS and SS (P < 0.05). Program workload, represented by number of applications received per program increased in GS, IS, and SS (P < 0.05), as well as the number of interviews conducted in GS and SS (P < 0.05). Importantly, match rate remained stable in GS and IS, with a decrease in SS (0.69 ± 0.03 to 0.63 ± 0.02, P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: The residency application process has been irrevocably changed due to COVID-19. The rise in applicant volume and competitiveness places unique strains on applicants and programs. Additional modifications such as signaling and ACGME guidance are needed to help alleviate strain and ensure that residents and programs alike find their best fit.

Navigating the American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination (ABSITE) Success: Insights From Pre-assessment Practices in Preparing Surgical Residents for Competitive Sub-specialties.

Introduction The American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination (ABSITE) is a critical tool in assessing surgical residents' readiness for board certification and clinical practice. While various factors influencing ABSITE performance have been examined, the impact of innovative educational resources, such as TrueLearn, remains underexplored. TrueLearn's adaptive learning algorithms and comprehensive question banks offer a promising adjunct to traditional study methods. This study investigates the relationship between TrueLearn utilization and ABSITE performance among general surgery residents. Methods This retrospective study, ethically approved by the Marshall University Institutional Review Board (IRB No. 2097669-1), analyzed the performance of general surgery residents at Marshall University from 2014 to 2022. Data were collected on ABSITE scores. Additionally, quiz percentages (Quiz %) and scores from two mock exams (Exam 1 and Exam 2), all provided by the TrueLearn platform, were included in the analysis. Descriptive statistics summarized the sample characteristics. Linear mixed models were employed to examine the associations between TrueLearn engagement and ABSITE performance, accounting for the correlated nature of the data and addressing any missing data at random. Statistical analyses were conducted using the Statistical Analysis System (SAS, version 9.4; SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC), with significance defined as a p-value < 0.05. Results The study cohort included 58 residents from 2016 to 2022. Linear mixed model analysis revealed significant positive correlations between TrueLearn Quiz %, Exam 1 scores, and Exam 2 scores with ABSITE performance. A 1% increase in Quiz % was associated with a 0.77-point rise in ABSITE scores (95% CI: 0.65, 0.89; p < 0.0001). For Exam 1, each point increase corresponded to a 6.36-point increase in ABSITE scores (95% CI: 5.01, 7.7; p < 0.0001), while Exam 2 scores showed a 3.8-point increase per point (95% CI: 2.74, 4.86; p < 0.0001). Discussion and conclusion Our findings underscore the significant impact of TrueLearn engagement on ABSITE performance, with higher quiz percentages and mock exam scores predictive of better ABSITE outcomes. This suggests that regular use of TrueLearn's educational resources enhances residents' knowledge and exam readiness. These results advocate for the integration of innovative educational tools such as TrueLearn into surgical training programs to optimize study strategies and improve exam performance. However, the study's retrospective design and single-institution focus limit the generalizability of the findings. Future research should explore these relationships in diverse settings and specialties and consider additional factors influencing ABSITE performance. This study highlights the positive association between TrueLearn utilization and ABSITE performance among general surgery residents, emphasizing the importance of innovative educational resources in surgical training. By enhancing engagement with platforms such as TrueLearn, surgical programs can improve residents' readiness for high-stakes examinations, ultimately contributing to the development of proficient surgical practitioners.

Examining the Most Impactful Strategies for In-service Preparation: A Systemic Review.

INTRODUCTION: Resident performance on the Plastic Surgery In-Service Examination (PSITE) is used as a predictor of success on the American Board of Plastic Surgery Written Examination, as well as resident progression and fellowship applications. However, information specifically addressing strategies on optimal PSITE preparation is lacking in the plastic surgery literature when compared to general surgery. For this reason, we aim to understand if the topic is well-studied and denote effective study strategies and curricular interventions in both fields that can help residents and programs optimize PSITE performance. METHODS: A literature search including studies from 2012 to 2022 was conducted following PRISMA guidelines in PubMed and EMBASE to identify articles on strategies to improve in-service exam scores for general surgery and plastic surgery. Only studies that reported measurable outcomes in raw score, percentile score, or percent correct were included. RESULTS: Qualitative analysis of 30 articles revealed 2 categories of interventions: individual study habits and institutional curricular interventions. In general surgery literature, 27 articles examined interventions positively impacting resident ABSITE scores, with 21 studies classified as institutional curricular interventions and 6 articles addressing individual study habits. Themes associated with improved ABSITE performance included mandatory remediation programs, dedicated study time, and problem-based learning interventions. In contrast, only 3 articles in plastic surgery literature discussed interventions associated with improved PSITE scores, all falling under curricular interventions. CONCLUSION: Unfortunately, the plastic surgery literature lacks concrete evidence on how residents can improve performance. Future research in plastic surgery should replicate successful strategies from general surgery and further investigate optimal preparation strategies for the PSITE. Such endeavors can contribute to improving resident performance and advancing plastic surgery education and patient care.

Impact of Surgical Residency Integration on Trauma and Acute Care Surgery Outcomes: A Retrospective Analysis.

BACKGROUND: In the context of surgical education reform, the integration of residency programs represents a significant milestone. Concerns about potential disruptions to patient care metrics amid these changes necessitate empirical investigation. METHODS: This study assessed the impact of integrating surgical residency programs on patient outcomes within Trauma and Acute Care Surgery services. Pre- and postintegration data were meticulously analyzed to evaluate key metrics, including length of hospital stay, recovery rates, and complication rates. RESULTS: Contrary to initial concerns, the introduction of residency programs did not yield significant alterations in patient care metrics. Analysis revealed consistent outcomes pre- and post-integration, indicating the resilience of patient care amidst educational reforms. Despite the introduction of a high-stakes training environment, patient outcomes remained stable. CONCLUSION: The study highlights the compatibility of educational advancements with the preservation of optimal patient care standards in Trauma and Acute Care Surgery services. Demonstrating the stability of patient care metrics in the face of educational reforms offers valuable insights for healthcare institutions considering similar initiatives. Overall, these findings contribute to the discourse on the value of surgical residency programs, reinforcing the importance of maintaining high-quality patient care standards while advancing surgical education.

Evaluating the Factors Influencing Residency Match for Surgical Specialty Applicants and Programs: Challenges and Future Directions.

INTRODUCTION: We aim to evaluate the impact of recent changes in the residency matching process on surgical specialties' applicants and programs to offer recommendations on residency selection and matching processes. METHODS: We utilized five databases while employing a Boolean query to search for studies from 2015 to March 2024. The search selection focused on factors and recent changes influencing residency match results across surgical specialties, including USMLE Step 1 pass/fail, research productivity, interview structure, and preference and geographic signaling. RESULTS: The shift of the USMLE Step 1 to a pass/fail scoring system revealed a consensus among surgical program directors (PDs) and applicants not in favor of the change due to the emphasis on additional application elements. Research productivity was identified as a significant factor, especially in neurosurgery (with an average of 18.3 publications per applicant) and vascular surgery (8.3 publications), indicating a positive correlation between the number of publications and match outcomes. The adoption of virtual interviews has been well-received by both applicants and PDs, leading to an increase in the number of interviews offered and applicants. The implementation of preference and geographic signaling mechanisms has improved interview rates for applicants who utilize them. CONCLUSION: The transition to a pass/fail USMLE Step 1 has raised concerns among surgical specialties, necessitating a greater focus on Step 2 scores and research productivity. Virtual interviews and signaling have improved the accessibility and reach of the residency application process, however, the full impact of these changes on the perception of applicant-program fit remains unclear.

Current status of the surgical training system in Japan: results of a nationwide questionnaire survey of graduating surgical trainees.

PURPOSE: To identify the problems trainees face during surgical training in Japan. METHODS: A nationwide online questionnaire survey was conducted targeting newly certified surgical trainees. RESULTS: The response rate was 53.8% (758/1410). Among those respondents, 25.6% were women, 71.4% were either married or had a partner, 41.3% had children, 72.7% had performed over 200 surgeries under general anesthesia, and 54.1% had chosen, before graduating from medical school, to become a surgeon. While 88.8% were interested in learning surgical techniques, 63.8% were hesitant to become a surgeon for fear of a compromised quality of private life (QOL). Conversely, only 1.4% chose their surgical training programs based on QOL. Overall, 84.6% of the trainees were satisfied with their training and this correlated with the number of surgeries performed. Only 29.9% received non-technical skill training. The average number of night shifts per month was 5.6, and 10.6% worked over 80 h per week. Harassment was reported by 41.5% of the respondents. Moreover, 33.0% had considered dropping out at some time, primarily because of their QOL (51.1%) or the harassment they had encountered (50.4%). CONCLUSION: This survey revealed that while trainees were satisfied with the overall training system, issues such as long working hours and harassment are prevalent. Working to improve these issues could make surgery more attractive for young trainees.

Developing an Evidence-Based Ethics Education Program for Surgical Residents in Guatemala.

OBJECTIVE: This study assessed 2 modalities for teaching responsible conduct of research and human subjects protection (RCR/HSP) to surgical residents in Guatemala-an "off the shelf" online curriculum and a new in-person curriculum specific to the local context. METHODS: In 2018, 160 surgical residents in 3 large urban hospitals in Guatemala City completed 2 online programs in RCR/HSP. Residents in the intervention arm also completed 7 weeks of in-person training. Pre- and post-assessments tested awareness of key concepts with particular attention to international and Guatemalan research regulations. Group differences in matched (pre- and post-) mean scores were analyzed using t-tests. RESULTS: One hundred forty residents completed pre- and post-training assessments and were included in the analytic sample. Overall mean scores improved modestly from 52.7 to 58.7 points out of 100. Intervention-arm trainees reported greater confidence in recognizing ethical issues, understanding legal and ethical requirements for research, and identifying, reporting and avoiding scientific misconduct than control-arm trainees. CONCLUSION: Given the limited availability of RCR/HSP faculty, financial resources, and time in the surgical training schedule, the investigators recommend that academic authorities in Guatemala consider online training programs in RCR/HSP in all surgical residency programs as an affordable and scalable strategy to build ethical research skills in its surgical workforce. Investment in human resources to support in-person ethics education as a way to build self-efficacy in ethical decision-making should be considered.

Surgical Residency Training in Nigeria: An Audit Through the Lenses of the Trainee and Trainer.

INTRODUCTION: Resident doctors constitute an important workforce of the Nigerian healthcare system wherein they undergo structured training to become competent specialists in different fields of medicine. The aim of this survey was to audit the surgical residency training process, incorporating both the trainer's and the trainee's perspectives, with a view to improving both residency training and overall patient care. METHODS: This was a multicenter descriptive cross-sectional study involving consultant surgeons and surgical trainees in selected tertiary healthcare institutions in Nigeria. A link to an online semi-structured and pretested questionnaire was sent to study participants whose agreement to fill out the questionnaire was taken as implied consent for the study. The perception of respondents on key areas of surgical residency training like the quality of training, skill acquisition, mentorship, supervision, operative exposures, research, funding, didactic sessions, and work schedule was assessed using a Likert scale. Their perceived challenges to training and measures to improve the quality of training were recorded. Data were analysed using version 23 of the SPSS. RESULTS: A total of 127 participants (25 trainers and 102 trainees) were recruited with a mean age of 34.8 ± 3.5 y for the trainees and 47.5 ± 6.9 y for the trainers. The majority of both the trainers and trainees (72%, n = 18 and 93%, n = 96, respectively) were dissatisfied with the quality of surgical residency training in Nigeria with the trainers (88%, n = 22) and trainees (97.1%, n = 99) mostly agreeing that surgical training should be standardized across training centres in Nigeria. The trainees and trainers rated mentorship, research, funding, and overall quality of surgical residency training as inadequate, while most of the trainees and trainers rated supervision of trainees as adequate. The trainees predominantly identified poor training facilities as the most important challenge to surgical residency, followed by high clinical workload, while the majority of the trainers identified workplace bullying and high clinical workload as being the predominant factors. The nine-pronged recommendations by both the trainers and trainees to improve surgical training in Nigeria include mentorship program for trainees, funding of surgical residency training, provision of facilities and equipment for training, adequate supervision of trainees by trainers, job description and defined work schedule for trainees, health insurance of patients, overseas training of trainees during the residency program, improved remuneration of trainees, and adequate motivation of trainers. CONCLUSIONS: The quality of surgical residency training in Nigeria is perceived as suboptimal by trainees and trainers. Perceived common challenges to surgical residency training include poor training facilities, workplace bullying, and high clinical workload. Adequate funding of surgical residency program, standardized mentorship, and training of trainees with improved remuneration of trainees and motivation of their trainers would enhance the overall quality of surgical residency training in Nigeria.

Interns' Perceived Level of Proficiency After General Surgery Rotation: A Cross-Sectional Study From Saudi Arabia.

BACKGROUND: The role of interns during general surgical rotation is crucial in shaping their future careers as surgeons. Surgical rotation offers a unique opportunity to gain valuable hands-on experience in fast-paced and challenging environments. However, interns often face significant challenges in obtaining the necessary practical training to develop proficiency in surgical techniques. This article aims to analyze some aspects of the accumulated competency of interns during their general surgery rotation, focusing on the range of skills and knowledge gained, in addition to the challenges faced. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study using an anonymous web-based self-assessment questionnaire. The target population of the study included all Jazan University medical interns enrolled in the academic year 2022-2023. RESULTS: Most participants showed low-to-average levels of proficiency in monitoring clinical evolution and treatment plans, ranging from fundamental awareness (n = 17, 17.5%) to working knowledge (n = 51, 52.6%), with only three participants (3.1%) reporting an expert level of proficiency. The same pattern was observed in the documentation of patient records (range: 7.2%, n = 7 for fundamental awareness to 42.3%, n = 41 for working knowledge). However, a significant proportion saw themselves as either proficient (n = 23, 23.7%) or experts (n = 15, 15.5%) in this aspect. Regarding bedside procedures, such as venipuncture, proctoscopy, nasogastric tube insertion, and urethral catheterization, the participants showed different proficiency levels, with the lowest in proctoscopy, where 66 (68.0%) of the participants reported only fundamental awareness. The results also revealed low perceived proficiency in performing surgical skin incisions, wound suturing, knot tying, application of surgical skin clips, and abscess drainage, with the lowest proficiency observed in the excision of superficial lumps as more than half of the participants reported only fundamental awareness (n = 51, 52.6%). CONCLUSION: The results of this study indicate that documentation and monitoring of patient progress are the competencies mastered most by the majority of interns during their rotations in general surgery. However, the interns' overall level of proficiency in bedside procedures and basic surgical skills acquired during their rotation was low to average. Additionally, interns were dissatisfied with their training and the opportunities provided for them to actively engage in performing procedures in the operating room. This low proficiency is unrelated to pre-internship academic achievement, sex, or interest in future surgical careers. This suggests that efforts are needed to develop strategies to enhance interns' satisfaction and engagement, ultimately improving their overall experience during internships.

Can my surgeon scope? Trends in endoscopy training volume and experience among general surgery residents in the United States: a nationwide analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Endoscopy is a major part of surgical training. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) has set standards regarding the minimum volume of endoscopy cases required for graduation. However, there is paucity of high-quality data on the number of cases that most surgical graduates perform. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of operative case logs of all general surgery residents graduating from ACGME-accredited programs from 2010 to 2023. Data on mean number of endoscopy cases, including mean in each subcategory, were retrieved. Mann-Kendall trend test was used to investigate trends in endoscopy experience. RESULTS: Between 2010 and 2023, the mean overall endoscopy procedures per resident remained stable, with 129.5 in 2010 and 132.1 in 2023 (t = 0.429; p-value = 0.037). The majority of these cases were performed as surgeon junior (76.6% in 2010; 80.9% in 2023), while the remaining cases were logged as surgeon chief. The most substantial contribution to the overall volume was from flexible colonoscopy (mean: 64.1 in 2010 and 67.2 in 2023). The volume for colonoscopy remained fairly stable (t = 0.429; p-value = 0.036). This was followed by esophagogastroduodenoscopy (mean: 35.3 in 2010 and 35.5 in 2023), which saw a significant increase in volume (t = 0.890; p-value ≤ 0.001). There was a significant increase in the number of overall upper endoscopic procedures (t = 0.791; p-value ≤ 0.001), while lower endoscopic procedures did not change significantly (t = 0.319; p-value = 0.125). The procedural volume for endoscopic retrograde cholangiography, sigmoidoscopy, cystoscopy/ureteroscopy, laryngoscopy, and bronchoscopy decreased significantly (p-value < 0.05 for all). CONCLUSION: The overall endoscopy volume for general surgery residents has largely remained stable, with a minor increase in esophagogastroduodenoscopy and no change in colonoscopy. Future research should investigate whether simulation-based exercises can bridge the gap between procedural volume and learning curve requirements for endoscopy.

An analysis of osteopathic medical students applying to surgical residencies following transition to a single graduate medical education accreditation system.

CONTEXT: Upon requests from osteopathic medical schools, the National Resident Matching Program (NRMP) Charting Outcomes were redesigned to include osteopathic medical school seniors beginning in 2018 and one joint graduate medical education (GME) accreditation system, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME), formed in 2020. OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study is to analyze the match outcomes and characteristics of osteopathic applicants applying to surgical specialties following the ACGME transition. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of osteopathic senior match outcomes in surgical specialties from the NRMP Main Residency Match data from 2020 to 2022 and the NRMP Charting Outcomes data from 2020 to 2022 was performed. RESULTS: For surgical specialties, results show matching increased as United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 2 CK (clinical knowledge) and Comprehensive Osteopathic Medical Licensing Examination (COMLEX) Level 2 CE (cognitive evaluation) scores increased along with the number of contiguous rankings (p<0.001). The greatest indication for matching looking at scores alone were those who scored greater than 230 on Step 2 CK compared to below (p<0.001) and above 650 on Level 2 CE (p<0.001). However, those who scored 240 (p=0.025) on Step 2 CK were just as likely to match as those who scored 250 (p=0.022) when compared to those who scored below those scores. Increasing research involvement had little to no significance with the likelihood of matching across most surgical subspecialties. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that there are unique thresholds for Step 2 CK scores, Level 2 CE scores, and the number of contiguous ranks for each surgical specialty that, when reached, are significantly associated with match success. Although certain board score delineations are linked with higher match success rates, the rates level off after this point for most surgical specialties and do not significantly increase further with higher scores. In addition, thresholds within contiguous ranks for increasing match likelihood exist and vary across surgical specialties. Overall, this study highlights that the quantitative metrics utilized to assess applicants lack the correlation reported historically, and the data presently available need to be more substantiated.

Analysis of Reapplicants to Ophthalmology Residency: Factors Associated with Successful Matching.

BACKGROUND: Ophthalmology residency programs are highly competitive and each year there are many unmatched reapplicants who must make time-sensitive decisions on how to prepare for their reapplication. Our analysis of reapplication factors will be the first evidence-based guide to reapplying ophthalmology. OBJECTIVE: To determine the components of a reapplicants application that contribute and that do not contribute to ophthalmology residency match success. METHODS: Eighty-eight total reapplicants to Dell Medical School's Department of Ophthalmology residency program for the year of 2022 and 2023 were analyzed in a retrospective review in 2023 based on their San Francisco match applications. We assessed match success in the context of demographics, academic performance, cognitive measures, letters of recommendation, personal statements, and extracurricular activities. RESULTS: Of 84 reapplicants who completed the San Francisco Match, 41 matched successfully (48.8%). Factors that significantly affected match success include quantity of LORs written by ophthalmologists (P = .0143), choice of interim year activity (p = .0019), and Step 2 Clinical Knowledge score (P = .0017). Our findings demonstrate that noncontributory factors to reapplicant match rate include number of publications during research years, demographics, clinical grades, Alpha Omega Alpha (AOA) membership, LOR qualities, and Step 1 score. CONCLUSIONS: Ophthalmology residency reapplicants should focus their efforts on finding a research year or established pre-ophthalmology residency program for their interim year and bolstering their letters of recommendations within the field. The quality of in-specialty relationships and letters of recommendation are more impactful than the number of publications during a research gap year. Step 2 CK score is a significant factor but would have already been determined by the time of reapplication. Metrics such as Step 1 scores, AOA status, number of volunteering experiences, and LOR and personal statement qualities had no effect on a reapplicant's chance of matching.