Arthroscopic Suture Anchor Fixation Results in Similar Clinical Outcomes, Less Range of Motion Limitation but Poorer Quality of Reduction compared to Open Screw Fixation for Acute Large Anterior Glenoid Rim Fractures.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the present study was to retrospectively compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of arthroscopic suture anchor fixation and open screw fixation for acute large anterior glenoid rim fractures. METHODS: This study enrolled patients with acute large anterior glenoid rim fractures treated with arthroscopic suture anchor fixation (group A) or open screw fixation (group O) from January 2013 to June 2020 with a minimum follow-up of＞2 years. The Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Rowe score, Constant score, range of motion (ROM), recurrent instability rate, and complications were recorded as clinical results. The quality of the postoperative reduction, reconstructed glenoid sizes, rate of fracture healing, and progression of osteoarthritis (OA) were evaluated as radiological outcomes. RESULTS: This retrospective study included 66 patients, including 37 in Group A and 29 in Group O with a mean follow-up of 46.9 (range, 24.3-94.2) months and a mean patient age of 46.8 (range, 21-69) years. No significant differences were found in the clinical outcomes between the two groups. A significant ROM limitation in all planes was found in both groups and group O showed more limitations in external rotation at the side (ERs) (18° vs. 10°, P = 0.002). The reduction quality was better in group O (P < 0.001). However, there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of reconstructed glenoid size (101.6% ± 4.6% vs. 100.6% ± 7.1%, P = 0.460) and the rate of OA progression (26.9% vs. 20%, P = 0.525). CONCLUSION: Arthroscopic suture anchor fixation and open screw fixation achieved similar clinical outcomes, reconstructed glenoid sizes, and OA progression in patients with acute large anterior glenoid rim fractures. Arthroscopic suture fixation showed a poorer quality of reduction but less ERs limitations.

Clinical Outcomes for Arthroscopic Anterior Talofibular Ligament Repair After Suture Anchor Insertion Through the Anterolateral Portal vs the Lateral Accessory Portal.

BACKGROUND: Two types of suture anchor insertion pathways (anterolateral portal vs lateral accessory portal) are used in arthroscopic anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL) repair. However, it is not clear which one is the better choice. This study aims to compare the clinical outcomes of these 2 suture anchor insertion pathways when performing arthroscopic ATFL lasso-loop repair for the treatment of chronic lateral ankle instability (CLAI). METHODS: From 2019 to 2021, patients with CLAI who underwent arthroscopic ATFL lasso-loop repair were retrospectively reviewed and divided into the anterolateral portal (ALP) group and the lateral accessory portal (LAP) group. A 1:1 propensity score matching was used to control confounding factors based on age, sex, body mass index, follow-up duration, preoperative visual analog scale (VAS) score, and Tegner score (ALP group, n = 26; LAP group, n = 26). Karlsson score, VAS score, Tegner score, operation time, anterior drawer test results, patient symptoms, and magnetic resonance (MR) evaluation of ATFL quality were used to describe the outcomes. RESULTS: The patient characteristics and follow-up durations were similar between the 2 groups. After a mean follow-up duration of 28.8 ± 2.3 months, the ALP group had significantly better Karlsson score, VAS score, and Tegner score improvement than the LAP group, with fewer symptoms. Seven patients in the LAP group still had a feeling of ankle instability, and 3 of them exhibited ankle laxity. CONCLUSION: In this study, we found that inserting the suture anchor through the anterolateral portal was associated with better outcomes compared to that through the lateral accessory portal when performing arthroscopic ATFL lasso-loop repair for CLAI patients. The improvement was greater for pain relief and function and was associated with a lower frequency of subjective ankle instability.

A clinical review of elbow ligament repairs and reconstructions in the acute and chronic settings.

Background: The ligamentous and osseous structures of the elbow joint are the major contributors to its inherent stability and damage to any of these structures can result in elbow instability. The aim of this study is to present objective and subjective outcomes following ligament repairs and/or reconstructions for acute elbow instability and chronic elbow instability. Methods: This study included patients who underwent an elbow ligament repair and/or reconstruction for acute or chronic elbow instability. We performed a comprehensive retrospective data analysis of the patient's files, followed by a clinical examination and X-ray of these patients. Results: We identified 12 acute stabilizations and 22 stabilizations for chronic instability. Patients who underwent stabilization for chronic instability had statistically significant improvements in their preoperative flexion and extension; 14.8 ± 6.4° and 5.9 ± 2.5°. Patients with chronic instability achieved better extension-flexion and pronation-supination arcs compared with their acute instability counterparts and this reached statistical significance. When the elbow pain and function scores were compared, we found stabilizations in the acute setting had better outcomes. There were two cases of postoperative instability, one in the acute instability group and one in the chronic instability group. Conclusion: This study provides evidence for elbow ligament repairs and reconstructions in both acute and chronic settings. It is an effective way of stabilizing the elbow joint in chronic instability patients, and results in an improvement in their overall range of motion. These patients achieved a greater range of motions compared with their acute instability counterparts.

Safety and efficacy of second-generation all-suture anchors in labral tear arthroscopic repairs: prospective, multicenter, 1-year follow-up study.

Background: This study's primary aim was to assess the safety and performance of second-generation all-soft suture anchors following arthroscopic labral tear repair. Methods: This prospective, multicenter study was conducted by 6 surgeons at 6 sites in Europe and the United States between November 2018 and August 2020. Patients who required shoulder arthroscopic repair, for a range of labral injuries, were treated with a second-generation all-soft suture anchor. The primary outcome was clinical success rate (percentage of patients without signs of failure and/or reintervention) at 6 months. Secondary outcomes included clinical success rate at 12 months, intraoperative anchor deployment success rate, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) at 6 and 12 months, including visual analog scale (VAS) pain assessment, VAS satisfaction assessment, EQ-5D-5L Index Score, EQ-5D-5L VAS Health Score, Rowe Shoulder Score for Instability, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, and Constant-Murley Shoulder Score. Serious adverse events and serious adverse device effects were collected throughout the study. Results: Forty-one patients were enrolled (mean age, 28.2 years; 87.8% male, 12.2% female). Clinical success was achieved in 27/28 and 31/32 patients at 6 months and 12 months, respectively. Anchor deployment had a 100% success rate. Significant improvements over baseline were reported for all PROs except Constant-Murley Shoulder (6 months) and VAS Satisfaction Score (12 months). One patient experienced 1 serious adverse event and 1 patient experienced 1 serious adverse device effect. Conclusion: Second-generation all-soft suture anchors used in this study demonstrated a high clinical success rate, a favorable safety profile, and patients exhibited significant improvement in PROs.

Superior load-to-failure in an all-suture anchor system for all-inside meniscal repair compared to a PEEK-cage anchor system in an experimental cadaveric test setting.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the biomechanical properties of a latest generation all-suture anchor repair device (ASARD) for meniscal repair with that of a latest generation PEEK-cage anchor repair device (PCARD) in an experimental setting using cadaveric menisci. Methods: Twenty-six menisci were obtained from the knees of fresh body donors. Artificially created meniscal lesions were treated randomly, using a single stitch with either an ASARD or a PCARD. Cyclic biomechanical testing, utilising a universal material testing machine and following an established protocol, was carried out and load-to-failure (LTF), displacement, stiffness, and mode-of-failure (MOF) reported. Results: Mean LTF was found to be 61% higher in the ASARD group at 107.10 N (standard deviation [SD], 42.34), compared to 65.86 N (SD, 27.42) in the PCARD group with statistical significance (p = 0.022). The ASARD exhibited a trend towards higher stiffness (10.35 N; SD, 3.92 versus 7.78 N; SD; 3.59) and higher displacement at cycles one, 100, and 499 (1.64, 3.27, and 4.17 mm versus 0.93, 2.19, and 2.83 mm) compared to the PCARD. Cheese wiring was the most common mode-of-failure in both groups (76.9%). Conclusions: This study demonstrates that an ASARD shows a higher mean LTF than a PCARD when compared in an experimental biomechanical setting. Level of evidence: Level III.

3D-printed porous titanium suture anchor: a rabbit lateral femoral condyle model.

BACKGROUND: The inclusion of a connecting path in a porous implant can promote nutrient diffusion to cells and enhance bone ingrowth. Consequently, this study aimed to evaluate the biomechanical, radiographic, and histopathological performance of a novel 3D-printed porous suture anchor in a rabbit femur model. METHODS: Three test groups were formed based on the type of suture anchor (SA): Commercial SA (CSA, Group A, n = 20), custom solid SA (CSSA, Group B, n = 20), and custom porous SA (CPSA, Group C, n = 20). The SAs were implanted in the lateral femoral condyle of the right leg in each rabbit. The rabbits (New Zealand white rabbits, male, mean body weight of 2.8 ± 0.5 kg, age 8 months) underwent identical treatment and were randomized into experimental and control groups via computer-generated randomization. Five rabbits (10 femoral condyles) were euthanized at 0, 4, 8, and 12 weeks post-implantation for micro-CT, histological analysis, and biomechanical testing. RESULTS: At 12 weeks, the CPSA showed a higher BV/TV (median 0.7301, IQR 0.7276-0.7315) than the CSSA and CSA. The histological analysis showed mineralized osteocytes near the SA. At 4 weeks, new bone was observed around the CPSA and had penetrated its porous structure. By 12 weeks, there was no significant difference in ultimate failure load between the CSA and CPSA. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated that the innovative 3D-printed porous suture anchor exhibited comparable pullout strength to conventional threaded suture anchors at the 12-week postoperative time-point period. Furthermore, our porous anchor design enhanced new bone formation and facilitated bone growth into the implant structure, resulting in improved biomechanical stability.

Open Repair of Posterior Cruciate Ligament Tibial Bony Avulsion With Metal Anchor: A Case Report.

Introduction: The posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) is the largest and strongest intra-articular ligament of the knee joint and the primary posterior stabilizer. PCL injuries are less frequent than other knee ligament injuries and are typically combined with meniscal and chondral injuries or in the context of multiligamentous injuries. It is critical to properly diagnose and treat these lesions in order to avoid the risk of PCL insufficiency, subsequent knee instability, and early osteoarthritis. Surgical management can vary, and the ideal fixation device is still debated. Suture anchors are an unusual mean of fixation of PCL tibial bony avulsion. We report on two patients treated with open anchor fixation for PCL tibial bony avulsion with a follow-up of 3 years. Case Presentation: A 15-year-old male and a 65-year-old male were treated with open anchor fixation for bony tibial avulsion of the PCL. Surgical treatment was performed at 5 weeks and 3 weeks after the trauma, respectively. Diagnosis was made with an X-ray followed by CT and MR scans. Repair was achieved by reinserting the PCL bony fragment to its posterior tibial eminence with suture anchors through an open posterior approach. Both patients recovered full knee stability and a pain-free full range of motion (ROM) within 4 months and returned to their previous activities with a high satisfaction. The patient has been followed up for 3 years, and no complications were observed. Conclusion: PCL bony avulsions are rare, and their optimal treatment remains a significant subject of debate, particularly in the skeletally immature patient. We believe that open repair with metal anchors could be a good choice to repair PCL bony tibial avulsion in patients without concomitant intra-articular lesions and immature growth plates or severe fragmentation.

Pectoralis major tendon rupture repairs using intramedullary suture anchors shows high patient-reported outcomes in military service members.

BACKGROUND: In the general population, pectoralis major tendon ruptures are uncommon; however, it is a common injury in the military population. The military service members have greater physical demands than the general population. The purpose of this study is to critically assess the postoperative outcomes of pectoralis major tendon ruptures in military service members following a repair using intramedullary suture anchors. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed between 2014 and 2022, identifying patients who underwent a pectoralis major rupture repair performed by the senior surgeon using intramedullary suture anchors. Records were reviewed for age, gender, mechanism of injury, chronicity, visual analog scale, and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) scores. Patients who had less than 1 year of follow-up were excluded from the study. During the study period, 18 patients underwent surgical repair of their torn pectoralis major, and 15 patients were followed up >1 year postoperatively. Twelve of these 15 patients (80%) were successfully contacted, and patient-reported outcomes were collected. RESULTS: A total of 12 patients (12 male, 0 female) with a mean age of 34.5 years were identified. Average time from injury to surgery was 471.4 days. Average duration of follow-up was 3.7 years. There was a decrease in the preoperative average single repetition maximum (1RM) barbell bench press of 125.7 kg (277 lbs) to a postoperative average 1RM bench press of 101.8 kg (225 lbs) (P = .03). Mean change in average 1RM barbell bench press is a 19.04% decrease postoperatively. Postoperative SANE score was 80.8 and an American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form score of 86.9. Seven patients (58.3%) stated they were afraid to bench press at their previous weight because of fear of reinjury. None of the patients were medically discharged from the military owing to limitations from their repaired shoulder. Ten patients (83%) reported they were extremely satisfied with their shoulder function postoperatively. CONCLUSION: Repair of the pectoralis major tendon ruptures using intramedullary suture anchors has high rates of return to duty, patient satisfaction, and patient-reported outcomes. More than half of the patients reported they were afraid to bench press at their preinjury weight because of concerns of reinjury; the decrease in postoperative strength may be a result of the patients' fear of reinjury rather than physiologic limitations.

Effect of cyclic loading on the ultimate tensile strength of small metallic suture anchors used for attaching artificial tendons in rabbits.

Background ­: Suture anchor failures can lead to revision surgeries which are costly and burdensome for patients. The durability of musculoskeletal reconstructions is therefore partly affected by the design of the suture anchors. Purpose ­: The purpose of the study was to quantify the strength of different suture anchors whose sizes are suitable for attaching artificial Achilles and tibialis cranialis tendons in a rabbit model, as well as determine the effect of cyclic loading on the anchoring strength. Method ­: Four anchors (two with embedded eyelet and two with raised eyelet, n=5 per group) were tested with cyclical loading (1000 cycles and 4.5 mm/sec) and without cycling, to inform the failure loads and mode of failure of the suture anchors. An eyebolt screw with smooth eyelet was used as a control for the test groups. Results ­: All samples in all groups completed 1000 cycles and failed via suture breakage in both test conditions. All anchors had failure loads exceeding the peak Achilles tendon force in rabbits during hopping gait. The data analysis showed an effect of anchor type on the maximum tensile force at failure (F max ) in all suture categories but not an effect of loading condition. Also, the Anika anchor had a significantly less adverse effect on suture strength compared to Arthrex anchor (p=0.015), IMEX anchor (p=0.004) and Jorvet anchor (p<0.001). We observed a greater percentage of failure at the mid-section for the anchors with the raised eyelets compared to the anchors with embedded eyelets, which all failed at the knot. Conclusion ­: Anchors with embedded eyelets had clinically preferred mode of failure with less adverse effects on suture and, may be more reliable than anchors with raised eyelets for attaching artificial Achilles and tibialis cranialis tendons in rabbits.

Extensor tendon rupture and preoperative mri confirmations of suture anchor prolapse: a case report and literature review.

BACKGROUND: While suture anchors are widely used in medical procedures for their advantages, they can sometimes lead to complications, including anchor prolapse. This article presents a unique case of suture anchor prolapse at the base of the distal phalanx of the little finger after extensor tendon rupture reconstruction surgery. CASE PRESENTATION: A 35-year-old male, underwent extensor tendon rupture reconstruction using a non-absorbable suture anchor. After seven years the patient visited our outpatients complaining of stiffness, pain, and protrusion at the surgical site. Initial X-ray imaging suggested suggesting either a fracture of the distal phalanx or tendon adhesion but lacked a definitive diagnosis. Subsequent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed bone connectivity between the middle and distal phalanges with irregular signal shadow and unclear boundaries while maintaining a regular finger shape. MRI proved superior in diagnosing prolapsed suture anchors, marking the first reported case of its kind. Surgical intervention confirmed MRI findings. CONCLUSIONS: Suture anchor complications, such as prolapse, are a concern in medical practice. This case underscores the significance of MRI for accurate diagnosis and the importance of tailored surgical management in addressing this uncommon complication.

Biomechanical Characteristics of All-Suture Meniscal Repair Devices Compared With PEEK-Anchored Devices and Inside-Out Suture for Meniscal Repair: A Porcine Study.

Background: Recently, all-suture, all-inside meniscal repair devices-including devices containing flat sutures or tapes-have been introduced. Similar to those in suture anchors, these modifications may have different performance characteristics than conventional sutures and polyether ether ketone (PEEK)-anchored devices. Purpose: To compare the biomechanical characteristics of all-suture meniscal repair devices with those of a conventional PEEK-anchored device and an inside-out meniscal suture construct. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: A total of 48 adult porcine menisci with simulated bucket-handle tears were included. Single-device repairs were performed with the SuperBall Meniscal Repair System, FiberStitch, and FAST-FIX 360 with 2 PEEK anchors, and a vertical mattress inside-out suture repair was performed using a Ti-Cron No. 2-0 braided polyethylene terephthalate suture. All specimens were preloaded (10 N) and cycled 200 times (between 10 and 50 N). Specimens surviving cyclic loading were then destructively tested. Endpoints included maximum failure load, stiffness, cyclic displacement, and failure mode. The goal was 12 successful tests in each group. Metrics between groups were compared using analysis of variance with post hoc tests to control for multiple comparisons. Results: The SuperBall (108.9 N) was significantly stronger than the FAST-FIX 360 (67.3 N) and Ti-Cron (75.2 N), and the FiberStitch (102.8 N) was significantly stronger than the FAST-FIX 360 (P≤ .01 for all). Cyclic stiffness increased during cyclic loading for all constructs (P < .001). The Ti-Cron was significantly stiffer than the SuperBall during 5 to 200 cycles (P < .001). Cyclic displacement significantly increased in all constructs during cycling (P < .001) but did not differ between devices. Failure mode varied by device: the Ti-Cron repairs failed because of suture breakage, the SuperBall and FAST-FIX 360 failed at the anchor, and the FiberStitch showed both failure modes. Conclusion: The all-suture, all-inside meniscal repair devices demonstrated superior strength to the PEEK-anchored device and the classic inside-out suture meniscal repair but no statistically significant difference in cyclic displacement.

Optimizing pectoralis major tendon repair: a modified knotless suture anchor technique using high-strength suture and tape.

Background: Rupture of the pectoralis major (PM) tendon is infrequent but has shown an increased incidence in athletes, particularly weightlifters during bench presses. Various techniques for repair exist, yet no established gold standard has been defined. Methods: We present a modified surgical technique utilizing knotless suture anchors for PM tendon repair. The technique involves bringing the tendon end superiorly and inferiorly to the decorticated bone surface, ensuring broader tendon-to-bone contact. Knotless anchors with a unique suture locking mechanism facilitate tension adjustment. Additionally, the repair's strength is reinforced by employing both surgical tape and high-strength suture. Results: The utilization of both surgical tape and high-strength suture in conjunction with knotless suture anchors provides a secure and stable construct. This approach minimizes the risk of failure, reduces the potential for neurovascular injury associated with bicortical drilling, preserves imaging quality due to the absence of metal artifacts, and helps avoid the risk of fracture associated with traditional methods. However, surgeons should be aware of a potential disadvantage of increased surgical costs compared to traditional techniques. Conclusion: Our modified technique offers multiple advantages, including increased tendon-to-bone contact, enhanced stability, reduced neurovascular risks, and avoidance of potential fractures. This makes it a valuable option for successful PM tendon repairs. Surgeons should consider its benefits and weigh them against the associated costs for optimal patient care.

A biomechanical study to optimize superior capsular reconstruction operative technique.

Background: The goals of this study were to optimize superior capsular reconstruction by assessing the relative fixation strength of 4 suture anchors; evaluating 3 glenoid neck locations for fixation strength and bone mineral density (BMD); determining if there is a correlation between BMD and fixation strength; and determining which portal sites have optimal access to the posterosuperior and anterosuperior glenoid neck for anchor placement. Methods: Twenty cadaveric specimens were randomized into 4 groups: all-suture anchor (FiberTak), conventional 3.0-mm knotless suture anchor (SutureTak), 3.9-mm knotless PEEK (polyetheretherketone) Corkscrew anchor, and 4.5-mm Bio-Corkscrew anchor. Each specimen was prepared with 3 anchors into the glenoid: an anterosuperior anchor, superior anchor, and posterosuperior anchor. All anchors were inserted into the superior glenoid neck 5 mm from the glenoid rim. A materials testing system performed cyclic testing (250 cycles) followed by load-to-failure testing at 12.5 mm/s. Cyclic elongation, first cycle excursion, maximum load, and stiffness were recorded. Using custom software, BMD was calculated at each anchor location. This software was also used to assess access to the posterosuperior and anterosuperior glenoid neck from standard arthroscopic portal positions. Results: There was no significant difference in cyclic elongation (P = .546), first cycle excursion (P = .476), maximum load (P = .817), or stiffness (P = .309) among glenoid anchor positions. Cyclic elongation was significantly longer in the PEEK Corkscrew group relative to the other implants (P ≤ .002). First cycle excursion was significantly greater in the FiberTak group relative to all other implants (P ≤ .008). For load-to-failure testing, the Bio-Corkscrew group achieved the highest maximum load (P ≤ .001). No other differences in cyclic or failure testing were observed between the groups. No differences in stiffness testing were observed (P = .133). The superior glenoid rim had the greatest BMD (P = .003), but there was no correlation between BMD and cyclic/load outcomes. The posterior portal (80% of specimens) and the anterior portal (60% of specimens) demonstrated the best access to the posterosuperior and anterosuperior glenoid neck, respectively. Conclusion: The 4.5-mm Bio-Corkscrew anchor provided the most robust fixation to the glenoid during superior capsular reconstruction as it demonstrated the strongest maximum load, had minimal elongation, had minimal first cycle excursion, and did not fail during cyclic testing. The superior glenoid neck had the highest BMD; however, there was no correlation between BMD or glenoid anchor location and biomechanical outcomes. The posterior portal and anterior portal provided optimal access to the posterosuperior glenoid neck and anterosuperior glenoid neck, respectively.

All-Suture Anchor vs. Knotless Suture Anchor for the Treatment of Anterior Shoulder Instability-A Prospective Cohort Study.

All-suture or soft-anchors (SA) represent a new generation of suture anchor technology with a completely suture-based system. This study's objective was to assess Juggerknot® SA, for arthroscopic Bankart repair in recurrent shoulder instability (RSI), and to compare it to a commonly performed knotless anchor (KA) technique (Pushlock®). In a prospective cohort study, 30 consecutive patients scheduled for reconstruction of the capsulolabral complex without substantial glenoid bone loss were included and operated on using the SA technique. A historical control group was operated on using the KA technique for the same indication. Clinical examinations were performed preoperatively and 12 and 24 months postoperatively. RSI and WOSI at 24 months were the co-primary endpoints, evaluated with logistic and linear regression. A total of 5 out of 30 (16.7%) patients suffered from RSI in the SA group, one out of 31 (3.2%) in the KA group (adjusted odds ratio = 10.12, 95% CI: 0.89-115.35), and 13.3% in the SA group and 3.2% in the KAgroup had a revision. The median WOSI in the SA group was lower than in the KA group (81% vs. 95%) (adjusted regression coefficient = 10.12, 95% CI: 0.89-115.35). Arthroscopic capsulolabral repair for RSI using either the SA or KA technique led to satisfying clinical outcomes. However, there is a tendency for higher RSI and lower WOSI following the SA technique.

Comparison of 3 Different Surgical Techniques for Rotator Cuff Repair in a Rabbit Model: Direct Suture, Inlay Suture, and Polyether Ether Ketone (PEEK) Suture Anchor.

BACKGROUND: Rotator cuff tears have been repaired using the transosseous method for decades. The direct suture (DS) technique has been widely used for rotator cuff tears; however, the retear rate is relatively high. Suture anchors are now used frequently for rotator cuff repair (RCR) in accordance with recent developments in materials. However, polyether ether ketone (PEEK) may still cause complications such as the formation of cysts and osteophytes. Some studies have developed the inlay suture (IS) technique for RCR. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: To compare how 3 different surgical techniques-namely, the DS, IS, and PEEK suture anchor (PSA)-affect tendon-bone healing after RCR. We hypothesized that the IS technique would lead to better tendon-to-bone healing and that the repaired structure would be similar to the normal enthesis. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: Acute infraspinatus tendon tears were created in 36 six-month-old male rabbits, which were divided into 3 groups based on the technique used for RCR: DS, IS, and PSA. Animals were euthanized at 6 and 12 weeks postoperatively and underwent a histological assessment and imaging. The expression of related proteins was demonstrated by immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence staining. Mechanical properties were evaluated by biomechanical testing. RESULTS: At 12 weeks, regeneration of the enthesis was observed in the 3 groups. However, the DS group showed a lower type I collagen content than the PSA and IS groups, which was similar to the results for scleraxis. The DS group displayed a significantly inferior type II collagen expression and proteoglycan deposition after safranin O/fast green and sirius red staining. With regard to runt-related transcription factor 2 and alkaline phosphatase, the IS group showed upregulated expression levels compared with the other 2 groups. CONCLUSION: Compared with the DS technique, the PSA and IS techniques contributed to the improved maturation of tendons and fibrocartilage regeneration, while the IS technique particularly promoted osteogenesis at the enthesis. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The IS and PSA techniques may be more beneficial for tendon-bone healing after RCR.

Sutures, Screws, Buttons, and Anchors: A Review of Current Bone Graft Fixation Devices for Glenoid Bone Loss in the Unstable Shoulder.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Anterior shoulder instability is associated with concomitant injury to several stabilizing structures of the shoulder, including glenoid bone loss. While instability is most common in young athletes and patients with predisposing conditions of hyperlaxity, recurrent shoulder instability can occur throughout various age ranges and may lead to longer term effects including pain and shoulder arthritis. Glenoid bone loss exceeding certain thresholds is generally treated by glenoid reconstruction via bone block augmentation to adequately stabilize the glenohumeral joint. These procedures increase the width of the articular surface on which the humeral head can translate before dislocation and, based on the procedure performed, provide a sling effect via the conjoined tendon, and increase tension to support the anterior capsule. The purpose of this review is to summarize the available literature regarding bone block fixation techniques. RECENT DEVELOPMENTS: Various fixation techniques have been utilized to secure bone block transfers. Though screw fixation has traditionally been used for bone block fixation, suture buttons, suture anchors, and all-suture techniques have been utilized in attempts to avoid complications associated with the use of screws. Biomechanical studies report variable force-resistance, displacement, and mode of failure when comparing screw to suture button-based fixation of glenoid bone blocks. Clinical and radiographic studies have shown these novel suture-based techniques to be comparable, and in some cases advantageous, to traditional screw fixation techniques. While screw fixation has long been the standard of care in glenoid bone block procedures, it is associated with high complication rates, leading surgeons to endeavor toward new fixation techniques. In available biomechanical studies, screw fixation has consistently demonstrated high maximal load-to-failure and displacement with cyclic loading. Studies have reported similar clinical and radiographic outcomes in both screw and suture-based fixation methods, with evidence of reduced bone resorption with suture fixation. While suture button fixation is associated with a higher rate of recurrent instability, overall complication rates are low. Future research should address biomechanical shortcomings of suture-based fixation techniques and continue to assess long-term follow-up of patients treated with each fixation method.

Utilizing Suture Anchors in Addition to Screws for Treatment of Tibial Tubercle Avulsion Fracture: A Case Report.

Tibial tubercle avulsion fractures are relatively uncommon fractures commonly seen in adolescent males. The treatment goal is to restore the extensor mechanism and to repair the articular surface. Although previous surgical techniques have been mainly screws or tension band wiring, there is a certain consensus on this. However, the choice of these surgical techniques largely depends on the surgeon. In our case, we utilized a suture anchor distal to the cannulated screw. This enabled us to use a smaller screw and cover the screw head completely with the patellar tendon. Therefore, this can be an advantage in lowering the incidence of device irritation. Given the successful outcome of our technique, we may consider applying suture anchors more frequently in tibial tubercle avulsion fractures in the future.

Retrospective Comparative Analysis of Clinical and Functional Outcome After Arthroscopic Bankart Repair using All-Suture Anchor and Metal Anchor.

Introduction: Both knotted all suture anchors and metal anchors are used for arthroscopic Bankart repair. We retrospectively evaluated and compared clinical and functional outcomes after arthroscopic Bankart repair using the knotted all-suture anchors and knotted metal anchors. Materials and methods: In a retrospective cohort analysis, patients who underwent arthroscopic Bankart repair without any concomitant additional lesion repair using either all-suture anchors or metal anchors, between January 2015 and May 2018 were identified. Their pre- and post-operative functional and clinical outcomes were compared using Rowe and WOSI scores. The recurrence rate in the two groups was also compared. Results: A total of 41 patients in all suture anchors group and 47 in the metal anchors group were identified as per inclusion and exclusion criteria. The demographic profile of both groups was comparable. There was no significant difference in clinical and functional outcome between the two suture anchor groups as per Rowe (pre-operative 40.13+6.51 vs 38.09+6.24 and post-operative 2 years 93.28+7.09 vs 92.55+9.2) and WOSI (pre-operative 943.05+216.64 vs 977.55+165.46 and post-operative 2 years 278.21+227.56 vs 270.94+186.25) scores. There was a significant improvement in both the groups between preoperative and post-operative ROWE and WOSI scores at 6 months and 2 years follow-up as compared to pre-operative scores (p<0.001). Re-dislocation rates were also comparable (4.8% vs 6.3%). Conclusion: All-suture anchors showed comparable clinical and functional results as the metal anchors for arthroscopic Bankart repair at two-year follow-up.

Semi-Bone Tunnel Technique Using Double-Row Suture Bridge Combined With Platelet-Rich Plasma Hydrogel for Rotator Cuff Repair in a Rabbit Model.

BACKGROUND: The approach to managing the footprint area and reconstructing the tendon-bone interface (TBI) is critical for optimal healing. PURPOSE: To evaluate the outcomes of the semi-bone tunnel (SBT) technique using a double-row suture bridge combined with platelet-rich plasma (PRP) hydrogel for rotator cuff repair in a rabbit model. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: A total of 48 New Zealand White rabbits were divided into 4 groups. The supraspinatus tendons were severed at the footprint to create a rotator cuff tear model in the surgical groups. Rabbits were treated with the traditional onto-surface repair (control group), SBT technique (SBT group), and SBT technique combined with PRP hydrogel implantation (SBT+PRP group). The rabbits without surgery were the normal group. At 8 weeks after surgery, macroscopic observation, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and micro-computed tomography (µCT) examinations, histological evaluations, and biomechanical tests were performed to assess the curative effects of the given treatments. RESULTS: The MRI results showed that the repaired supraspinatus tendon presented a uniform signal, minimal inflammatory response, and the lowest signal-to-noise quotient value in the SBT+PRP group. The µCT results suggested that the SBT technique did not reduce the local bone mineral density in the TBI area compared with the onto-surface repair technique. The histological staining results showed that the regenerated TBI in the SBT+PRP group had a 4-layer structure similar to the natural tissue. The highest values for biomechanical properties were observed in the SBT+PRP group, and there was no significant difference between the SBT+PRP group and normal group. CONCLUSION: The SBT technique presented a better tendon-bone healing effect for rotator cuff tear in the rabbit model compared with the traditional onto-surface repair technique. The specimens in the SBT+PRP group had a similar TBI structure and biomechanical properties to the natural tissue. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The SBT technique can be an alternative surgical approach for rotator cuff repair, especially for moderate to large tears and cases requiring scaffold implantation.

Fixation technique of biodegradable magnesium alloy suture anchor in the rotator cuff repair of the shoulder in a goat model: a technical note.

BACKGROUND: Shoulder disorders, particularly rotator cuff tears, are prevalent musculoskeletal conditions related to aging. Although the widely used suture anchor technique provides strong mechanical support to the tendon, it is associated with a risk of postoperative tendon retearing. The conventionally used titanium alloys can affect the interpretation of magnetic resonance imaging. Degradable magnesium alloys possess excellent biocompatibility, similar mechanical property to the bone, and stimulating bone formation ability from Mg2+. The purpose of this experiment was to develop innovative magnesium-based suture anchors to enhance rotator cuff repair by improving fixation materials, and to evaluate their feasibility in a goat model. METHODS: We developed fluoridized ZK60 suture anchors as the implantation material for two goats, who underwent rotator cuff repair surgery on both shoulders. Computed tomography (CT) and histological analysis were performed at 12 weeks postoperatively, and the results were compared between the magnesium and titanium alloy groups. Additionally, a hematological examination was conducted, which included assessments of red blood cells, white blood cells, platelets, coagulation function, liver function, kidney function, and magnesium ion concentration. RESULTS: The 12-week postoperative CT images showed intact MgF2 ZK60 suture anchors, effectively reconnecting the infraspinatus tendon to the humeral head. The anchors became less visible on CT scans, indicating absorption by surrounding tissues. New bone formation in the MgF2 group surpassed that in the Ti group, demonstrating superior osseointegration. The similarity between cortical bone and magnesium reduced stress-shielding and promoted bone regeneration. Histological analysis revealed successful tendon healing with MgF2 anchors, while the Ti group showed discontinuous interfaces and reduced collagen secretion. Hematological examination showed stable liver, renal function, and magnesium ion levels. CONCLUSIONS: The findings indicate that MgF2-coated suture anchors are feasible for rotator cuff repair and potentially other orthopedic applications. We hope that magnesium alloy anchors can become the solution for rotator cuff tendon repair surgery.