Usability of Minimal Invasive Surgery for Elbow Dislocation with Coronoid Process Fracture: A Protocol Development Study.

OBJECTIVE: The study aims to explain whether or not minimal invasive surgery (MIS) would be feasible in elbow fracture-dislocation with coronoid process fracture. METHODS: At Taipei Veterans General Hospital, patients who had elbow dislocations with coronoid process fractures underwent a single surgeon's MIS techniques which included the fluoroscopy-guided ulnar anteromedial (FGUAM) approach in the stage of reducing the coronoid process. When there is a proximal ulnar fracture, the posterior incision should be necessary, followed by the incision over the lateral or medial elbow for treating radial fractures or ligament injuries. RESULTS: The Flow Diagram for approach recommendation was established on the basis of defining MIS as that which does not include cross-plane dissection. The importance of anterior rigid fixation for the coronoid process was also emphasized. CONCLUSIONS: MIS can be achieved by multiple limited surgical incisions. Although the posterior extensile approach is necessary in situations of ulnar metaphysis or ligament avulsion fracture, the FGUAM approach decreases the cross-plane dissection.

'The Treatable Triad' Long term functional results of surgically treated acute, isolated terrible triad injuries: An 18-year follow up.

BACKGROUND: Surgical techniques for Terrible Triad injuries developed 20 years ago. Good and excellent short- and medium-term functional results have been reported. No long-term (over 10 years) functional outcomes have previously been reported. This case-series is the longest follow-up of patients treated for acute, isolated terrible triad injuries using a standard treatment protocol. METHODS: 20 Patients with acute, isolated, surgically managed terrible triad injuries were treated between October 2001 and May 2008. 10 of these patients were seen face-to face for a clinical follow-up and if required a radiological assessment. Mayo Elbow Performance Scores (MEPS) and Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) scores, requirement for further surgery and elbow instability were recorded. RESULTS: The average length of follow-up was 18.8 years. The mean MEPS was 88 and the mean DASH score was 12.3. The average loss of pronation was 8 degrees. The average loss of supination was 13 degrees. The re-operation rate was 40%, only one of these was a functionally limiting operation. A trend towards osteoarthritis was observed but there were no conversions to total elbow replacement. DISCUSSION: This is the longest-term follow-up study of these injuries and demonstrates the functional performance that the majority of patients achieve. The low follow-up rate can be expected with such a long interval between treatment and assessment. A relatively high re-operation rate is largely made up of minor procedures (removal of metalwork and cubital tunnel release) which did not impact the patients' functional status. CONCLUSION: This study adds to the evidence that the terrible triad of the elbow is surgically treatable to allow a high functional standard not only in the short-term but also in the long-term. As such this is a useful adjunct to have both when informing patients of what can be expected in their long-term recovery from this injury.

The anconeus-triceps lateral flap approach in terrible triad of the elbow: good outcome in a series of ten cases.

Introduction: Standard surgical management for the terrible triad of the elbow (TTE) has been established since 2004, yet postoperative complications are common and consensus on optimal management is absent. Different surgical algorithms for treating TTE and their efficacy have been reported worldwide, yet evidence from Vietnam remains limited. Methods: Ten cases diagnosed with TTE admitted to the Hospital of Traumatology and Orthopedics, a tertiary orthopedic center in Ho Chi Minh City, were presented to demonstrate the effectiveness and rate of postoperative complications following our stepwise surgical procedures using the anconeus-triceps lateral flap approach. The intraoperative "drop sign", quantitative assessment of pain and level of upper arm disability (via VAS and QuickDASH score) was mentioned to assess the algorithm's benefit. All patients' information was retrieved from medical records from August 2022 to January 2024. Results: All 10 cases required repair of the lateral ligament complex and underwent surgery within 2 days of hospitalization. Immediate postoperative imaging revealed no drop sign, and none of the patients experienced elbow dislocation nor the need for repeated surgery, and a full range of elbow motion was demonstrated at 3-6 months follow-up. Conclusion: TTE is a challenging injury that almost always obligates surgical correction. The anconeus-triceps lateral flap approach, with its advantages of better visualization and preservation of certain essential stabilizing muscles of the elbow, was demonstrated to yield a high success rate and low postoperative complication rate.

Total Knee Arthroplasty Periprosthetic Joint Infection With Concomitant Extensor Mechanism Disruption and Soft-Tissue Defect: The Knee Arthroplasty Terrible Triad.

BACKGROUND: Periprosthetic infection (PJI) with concomitant extensor mechanism disruption (EMD) and soft-tissue defect-hereinafter termed the "Terrible Triad"-is a devastating complication following total knee arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to define the surgical and clinical outcomes following management of a cohort of patients who have the Terrible Triad. METHODS: From 2000 to 2022, 127 patients underwent operative management for PJI alone, 25 for PJI with soft-tissue defects (defined as defects requiring flap reconstruction or being a factor contributing to the decision of performing above-knee amputation or arthrodesis), 14 for PJI with EMD, and 22 for the Terrible Triad. A composite outcome of infection status, range of motion, extensor lag, and ambulatory status at final follow-up was used to compare the proportion of patients in each group with a favorable overall knee outcome. Differences between groups were determined using one-way analyses of variance with post hoc Tukey's tests and Pearson's Chi-square tests or Fisher's exact tests with post hoc Bonferroni adjustments, where applicable. Odds ratios (OR) were calculated for comparison of the overall knee outcome between groups. A Kaplan-Meier survival analysis for patient mortality was performed. RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 8.4 years and similar between groups (P = .064). Patients who had the Terrible Triad had a 45.5% incidence of above-knee amputation, or arthrodesis, and an 86.4% incidence of an unfavorable outcome. Compared to patients in the PJI group, patients in the PJI who had a soft-tissue defect (OR = 5.8, 95% CI [confidence interval] 2.2 to 15.7), PJI with EMD (OR = 3.7, 95%CI 1.0 to 12.9), and Terrible Triad groups (OR = 11.6, 95% CI 3.3 to 41.5) showed higher odds of an unfavorable knee outcome. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that the total knee arthroplasty Terrible Triad is a dreaded diagnosis with poor outcomes. Clinicians and patients might consider early treatment with amputation or arthrodesis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Coronoid fractures and complex elbow instability: current concepts.

Fractures of the coronoid process typically occur as part of more complex injury patterns, such as terrible triads, trans-olecranon fracture-dislocations, posteromedial rotatory injuries or Monteggia-like lesions. Each pattern is associated with a specific type of coronoid fracture with regard to shape and size and specific soft-tissue lesions. O' Driscoll classification incorporates those associations identifying three major types of fractures: tip, anteromedial facet, and basal fractures. The objective of this study is to review the most common types of complex elbow instability, identify the indications for coronoid fixation and guide the appropriate management. Tip fractures as those seen in terrible triads can conditionally left untreated provided that elbow stability has been restored after radial head fixation and ligaments repair. Anteromedial facet fractures benefit from a buttress plate, while large basilar fractures can be effectively secured with posteroanterior screws. Coronoid reconstruction with a graft should be considered in post-traumatic cases of chronic coronoid deficiency.

Biomechanical evaluation of the modified lasso technique.

BACKGROUND: The Terrible Triad of the elbow is a constellation of elbow dislocation, radial head fracture and coronoid process fracture. A common type of coronoid fracture documented with this triad is type II Regan-Morrey coronoid fractures. The preferred fixation method for this fracture type is the lasso technique, medial-lateral tunnel orientation being the traditional approach. Considering elbow anatomy, we saw an opportunity to potentially improve fixation by altering the suture lasso tunnel orientation to a proximal-distal orientation. HYPOTHESIS: Two tunnels in the proximal-distal direction would result in greater biomechanical stability as compared to the traditional lasso technique. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A type 2 Regan-Morrey fracture was created in 12 fresh frozen cadaveric elbows at 50% of the coronoid height using an oscillating saw. The humero-ulnar joint was placed in 0 degrees flexion then loaded at a rate of 10mm/min to failure. RESULTS: The control technique (medio-lateral tunnels) showed failure load of 150±81N that was not significantly different (p=0.825) than the 134±116N measured for the modified technique (distal-proximal tunnels). The portion of the load-displacement curve used to calculate stiffness was linear (R^2=0.94±0.04) with determination coefficients that did not differ between the two groups (p=0.351). For stiffness, we measured 17±13N/mm and 14±12N/mm respectively for control and modified techniques that did not result in a significant difference (p=0.674). CONCLUSION: In this attempt to improve the shortcomings of the lasso technique, we found that changing from medio-lateral to proximal-distal drilling directions did not result in an appreciable biomechanical benefit. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Basic science study; Biomechanics.

A pediatric terrible triad fracture of elbow with lateral epicondyle avulsion.

A terrible triad fracture of the elbow is defined as an elbow dislocation with associated fractures of the coronoid process and radial head. This injury is uncommon in adults and exceptional in immature skeletons. We report a rare case of a terrible triad in a 14-year-old boy with a lateral epicondyle fracture. The diagnosis was suspected by the X-ray and confirmed by a CT scan after a closed reduction of the elbow, which was unstable. After a lateral approach of the elbow, the radial head and the lateral epicondyle were fixed by K-wire, and the fragment of the coronoid process was fixed by a bone suture. At two years of follow-up, the clinical and radiological outcomes were good. The terrible triad of the elbow is an exceptional trauma in children. Fracture avulsion of the lateral epicondyle is a particularity in the immature skeleton, equivalent to the lateral ligament injury in adults. A CT scan is mandatory after the reduction of the elbow to evaluate bone lesions. Open reduction by a single-lateral approach is indicated in cases of instability in extension.

Non-operative management of terrible triad injuries of the elbow; not so terrible?

Introduction: Terrible triad injuries (TTIs) of the elbow have traditionally been reported to have poor outcomes, hence requiring surgical stabilisation. We identified and reviewed patients with TTIs treated non-operatively within our department. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients with TTI treated non-operatively with standardised elbow-instability rehabilitation from 2010 to 2020. We used Mason and Morrey classifications for radial head and coronoid fractures, respectively. Non-operative indications included a congruent joint on CT, significant co-morbidities pre-disposing to high-risk surgery and/or patient preference. Outcomes included Oxford Elbow Score (OES), ROM and complications. Results: Nineteen patients were included (mean age 49; 37% female). At an average of 6 years (range 2-11 years) post-treatment, mean OES was 46 ± 7. At last clinic review, mean 6 months (2-15), average ROM was 131 ± 11° flexion, 8 ± 10° extension, 85 ± 12° supination and 85 ± 13° pronation. One patient required arthrolysis and another had an incongruent ulnohumeral joint which developed clicking with a functional ROM. Conclusion: Our report suggests non-operatively managed and appropriately rehabilitated TTI injuries can achieve good function and ROM. We recommend conservative management as a viable option in cases with joint congruency and no mechanical block in patients with significant co-morbidities or those refusing surgery but patients must be assessed on a case-by-case basis.

Management of Ipsilateral Terrible Triad Injury of Elbow and Concomitant Proximal Humerus Fracture: A Case Report and Literature Review.

Introduction: A difficult pattern of injuries is Hotchkiss's terrible triad, which includes elbow dislocations with fracture of the coronoid and head of radius. It is uncommon to have a concurrent proximal humerus fracture, which makes clinical care even more difficult. Case Report: An injured worker, 33 years old, claimed to have fallen from a height and received several injuries when he arrived at our emergency center. On physical examination, the patient showed signs of deformity and had an open injury over his left elbow. The radiographic evaluation showed that the patient had a posterior elbow dislocation along with a fracture of the left coronoid, head of radius, and proximal humerus. Following the reduction in a closed manner, computed tomography of the left elbow was carried out for additional assessment. The patient had both the proximal humerus and elbow fixed, and then the elbow was immobilized for 2 weeks. Conclusion: Complex musculoskeletal injuries resulting from high-energy trauma require a thorough, multidisciplinary strategy to address since long-term results and any consequences will require ongoing monitoring and rehabilitation.

Complex elbow fracture-dislocations- what factors are associated with a poor post-operative outcome?

PURPOSE: Despite standardized treatment algorithms, patients with complex elbow fracture-dislocation frequently suffer from poor post-operative elbow function leading to reduced quality of life. Up to now, there is no valuable data regarding risk factors that lead to poor post-operative outcome after surgical reconstruction of complex elbow fracture-dislocations. METHODS: From 06/2010 to 12/2020 134 patients (51.3 ± 15.1 years, 44% women) undergoing surgical treatment of complex elbow fracture-dislocations could be included in this study. Follow-up period was 4.4 years (SD 2.5). All patients were clinically evaluated for elbow movement, elbow stability and common elbow scores (MEPS, OES, DASH-Score). Potential risk factors for poor post-operative outcome were identified using bi- and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: Overall good post-operative outcome has been achieved, mean MEPS was 88.8 ± 17.6. Post-operative complications occurred in 31.3% of the cases, while 25.4% required surgical revision. Patients with transolecranon dislocation fractures showed the significantly worst functional outcomes (p = 0.01). In addition, it has been shown that a patient's age of more than 70 years (OR = 10, p = 0.003) and a BMI of more than 35 kg/m2 (OR = 7.6, p = 0.004) are independent risk factors for a poor post-operative outcome. In contrast, gender and time to surgery showed no significant influence on post-operative outcome. CONCLUSION: In most cases, good post-operative functional results can be achieved using standardized treatment protocols. However, complication and revision rates remain high. Patients older than 70 years of age or with a BMI over 35 kg/m2 are at risk for an inferior outcome and require close follow-up monitoring.

Terrible Triad of the Elbow with Ipsilateral Complete Triceps Tearing, Distal Radius and Scaphoid Waist Fracture: A Case Report.

Introduction: The terrible triad of the elbow includes an elbow dislocation or subluxation with coronoid and in combination with radial head fractures. Still, none of them are accompanied by rupture of the triceps tendon. Case Report: The article describes a terrible triad injury in a young patient with an additional triceps rupture. The treatment involved lateral and medial approaches for the repair of various ligaments and fractures, but the elbow remained unstable. A posterior approach was used to repair the triceps rupture. Conclusion: Triceps tendon rupture may be accompanied by dribble triad injuries, highlighting the importance of pre-operative evaluation to select the most appropriate surgical approach. The selection of an optimal surgical approach is crucial for the successful treatment and management of these injuries.

The Internal Joint Stabilizer of the Elbow: A Systematic Review of the Clinical and Biomechanical Evidence.

Purpose: The goal of surgical management for unstable elbow injuries is the restoration of joint concentricity and stability. After internal fixation, concerns may exist regarding instability or durability of the fixation construct. Historically, these scenarios were treated with options such as transarticular pinning or external fixation. Recently, an internal joint stabilizer (IJS) that allows postoperative mobilization was introduced. Our objective was to systematically review the literature to aggregate the clinical and biomechanical evidence for the IJS of the elbow. Methods: A systematic review of the PubMed and Google Scholar databases was performed, following the PRISMA guidelines. The search results were narrowed from 2015 through 2023 to coincide with the inception of the device being reviewed. Results: A total of nine retrospective reports on the IJS (N = 171) cases at a mean follow-up of 10.8 months were included. The pooled rate of implant failure was 4.4%, and recurrent instability was 4.1%. Additionally, the we included seven case reports and two biomechanical reports. Conclusions: The aggregate literature describes satisfactory clinical outcomes with low rates of recurrent instability and device failure for the IJS of the elbow. The limited biomechanical investigations conclude efficacy for stability profiles. Clinical relevance: Across a spectrum of unstable elbow cases, the IJS prevented recurrent instability during the early postoperative period. Notably, the device requires an additional procedure for removal, and the long-term impact of the retained devices is currently unclear.

The use of hinged elbow orthosis following surgical management of terrible triad injuries of the elbow.

PURPOSE: To determine outcomes following surgical management of terrible triad injuries in patients treated with and without a hinged elbow orthosis (HEO) in the post-operative setting. METHODS: This study was a retrospective review of 41 patients who underwent surgical treatment of terrible triad injuries including radial head fracture, coronoid fracture, and ulnohumeral dislocation between 2008 and 2023 with at least 10-week follow-up. RESULTS: Nineteen patients were treated post-operatively without HEO, and 22 patients were treated with HEO. There were no differences in range of motion (ROM) between patients treated with and without HEO in final flexion-extension arc (118.4° no HEO, 114.6° HEO, p = 0.59) or pronation-supination arc (147.8° no HEO, 141.4° HEO, p = 0.27). Five patients treated without HEO and one patient treated with HEO returned to the operating room for stiffness (26%, 5%, p = 0.08). QuickDASH scores were similar between groups (p = 0.69). CONCLUSIONS: This study found no difference in post-operative ROM, complications, or QuickDASH scores in patients treated post-operatively with or without HEO. Based on these results, we cannot determine whether the use of HEO adds additional stability to the elbow while initiating ROM exercises post-operatively.

Postoperative mobilization after terrible triad injury: systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Terrible triad injury is a complex injury of the elbow, involving elbow dislocation with associated fracture of the radial head, avulsion or tear of the lateral ulnar collateral ligament, and fracture of the coronoid. These injuries are commonly managed surgically with fixation or replacement of the radial head and repair of the collateral ligaments with or without fixation of the coronoid. Postoperative mobilization is a significant factor that may affect patient outcomes; however, the optimal postoperative mobilization protocol is unclear. This study aimed to systematically review the available literature regarding postoperative rehabilitation of terrible triad injuries to aid clinical decision making. METHODS: We systematically reviewed the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature) databases in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The inclusion criteria were studies with populations aged ≥16 years with terrible triad injury in which operative treatment was performed, a clear postoperative mobilization protocol was defined, and the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) was reported. Secondary outcomes were pain, instability, and range of motion (ROM). Postoperative mobilization was classified as either "early," defined as active ROM commencement before or up to 14 days, or "late," defined as active ROM commencement after 14 days. RESULTS: A total of 119 articles were identified from the initial search, of which 11 (301 patients) were included in the final review. The most common protocols (6 studies) favored early mobilization, whereas 5 studies undertook late mobilization. Meta-regression analysis including mobilization as a covariate showed an estimated mean difference in the pooled mean MEPS between early and late mobilization of 6.1 (95% confidence interval, 0.2-12) with a higher pooled mean MEPS for early mobilization (MEPS, 91.2) than for late mobilization (MEPS, 85; P = .041). Rates of instability reported ranged from 4.5% to 19% (8%-11.5% for early mobilization and 4.5%-19% for late mobilization). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that early postoperative mobilization may confer a benefit in terms of functional outcomes following surgical management of terrible triad injuries without appearing to confer an increased instability risk. Further research in the form of randomized controlled trials between early and late mobilization is advised to provide a higher level of evidence.

Variant of the terrible triad of the elbow, a CASE report with a review of the literature.

INTRODUCTION: The terrible triad described by Hotchkiss in 1996 is a complex lesion of the elbow, following a trauma combining forced valgus and external rotation. It is a lesion that puts the elbow at risk of developing complications such as instability, stiffness, or synostosis of the proximal radio-cubital joint. CASE REPORT: We report the case of a patient who suffered a closed trauma to the right elbow following a fall onto the palm of the hand with a valgus lateral rotation mechanism. The lesion assessment showed a B2 fracture of the distal humerus (AO classification) with a line splitting the capitulum in the frontal plane, a type 3 coronoid process fracture (Morrey/Odriscoll classification), and a posterolateral elbow dislocation. The surgical treatment followed the same principles as for the terrible triad, with a reconstruction of the lateral column by osteosynthesis of the humeral palate, followed by an internal approach for osteosynthesis of the coronoid process, with the restoration of a stable elbow without laxity in the frontal plane. DISCUSSION: On the basis of the lesion mechanism, column theory, and the schematization of the constituent elements of elbow stability in a ring, certain lesions can be placed in the same box as the terrible triad of the elbow, which also complies with the same therapeutic implications. CONCLUSION: Our observation underlines the possibility of the existence of lesions other than those described by Hotchkiss, which would have the same consequences: an unstable elbow with the risk of evolving into chronic instability or stiffness and whose management accepts the same management.

Postoperative Functional Evaluation in Patients Undergoing Surgical Treatment of the Terrible Triad Injury of the Elbow.

Objective To evaluate the functional results of patients submitted to a surgical approach for the treatment of the terrible triad of the elbow, analyzing the treatment methods used and associated epidemiological variables. Methods Patients who underwent surgical treatment for the terrible triad of the elbow from February 2018 to June 2020 at our service were evaluated. The identified sample consisted of 17 patients, but of these, only 13 completed all stages of the study and, therefore, were considered as the universe to be considered. Epidemiological information of interest was collected: age, sex, hand of dominance, affected side, characteristics and classification of injuries, trauma mechanism, time to surgery, type of procedure performed and range of motion. The Mason classification was used for radial head fractures and the Regan and Morrey classification for the coronoid process. In order to perform a functional analysis, the DASH and BRUCE questionnaires were applied. Results About 77% of the patients were male, 92% of the fracture mechanisms were due to high-energy trauma. Contrary to this, the predominance of the non-dominant side was observed as the most affected. Evaluating the results according to the time to start the treatment, the patients operated within 14 days had statistically better functional results. Conclusion Surgical treatment of TTIE generates acceptable functional results in most cases. The success of the treatment is related to the time interval between the trauma and the first surgery, in addition to the severity of the injuries.

Antibiotic-loaded spacer arthroplasty in a terrible triad injury with unreconstructable radial head fracture: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Radial head arthroplasty is a viable option in cases with terrible triad injuries of elbow, wherein the radial head sustains significant comminution that precludes reconstruction. Nevertheless, this alternative is not recommended for individuals with poor elbow skin conditions, accompanied neuropsychiatric disorders, or low patient compliance. This case report presents a patient with bilateral terrible triad injury, along with the aforementioned conditions. The report outlines the treatment challenges of such a case and proposes potential solutions. CASE PRESENTATION: A 37-year-old Persian male patient presenting with a bilateral terrible triad fracture-dislocation and a history of psychoactive substance abuse, was admitted to our emergency department. The patient underwent radial head replacement using a cement spacer containing antibiotics, due to the comminuted radial head in the presence of a contaminated wound on the left elbow. The fracture of the right side was successfully fixed. Subsequent to discharge, the patient did not attend any follow-up appointments. After a period of 6 months, he was admitted to the psychiatric ward and orthopedic consultation was requested to evaluate the patient. CONCLUSION: In acute terrible triad injuries with unreconstructable radial head fractures where arthroplasty with metallic prostheses may not be suitable due to contaminated wounds, unstable psychiatric condition, and low patient cooperation, temporary orthopedic cement spacers can maintain elbow biomechanics, stability, and sterility.