Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 1.397
Filter
1.
Pain Ther ; 2024 Sep 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39256291

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Pain and disability management are crucial for a speedy recovery. Combining analgesics with different mechanisms of action provides greater pain relief with lower doses, promoting efficient multimodal analgesia. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety between two fixed-dose combinations (FDC): etoricoxib/tramadol compared to paracetamol/tramadol for the management of acute low back pain (LBP) in a 7-day treatment. METHODS: We conducted a phase IIIb, prospective, randomized, and multicenter study in patients with acute LBP treated with etoricoxib 90 mg/tramadol 50 mg (one packet of granules diluted in 100 ml of water, once a day [QD], for 7 days) or paracetamol 975 mg/tramadol 112.5 mg (one tablet of 325 mg/37.5 mg, three times a day [TID], for 7 days) to assess the efficacy (in terms of pain and disability improvement) and safety. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-four patients were randomized to receive either etoricoxib/tramadol QD (n = 61) or paracetamol/tramadol TID (n = 63). From the magnitude of change in pain evaluations, differences were observed between the treatment groups at 3 [p = 0.054, CI 95% - 0.648 (- 0.010 to 1.306)] and 5 days (p = 0.041). The proportion of patients with a 30% reduction in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score was statistically significant when comparing the treatment groups on the third day of follow-up [p = 0.008, CI 95% 0.241 (0.061-0.421)]. An improvement in LBP's disability to perform activities of daily routine (Oswestry and Roland-Morris questionnaires) was observed in both treatment groups. A total of 79 adverse events (AEs) (38 [48.1%] with etoricoxib/tramadol and 41 [51.9%] with paracetamol/tramadol) were reported. The most frequent AEs were nausea (17.7%) and dizziness (16.4%). CONCLUSIONS: The results show the clinical benefits of etoricoxib/tramadol FDC, such as the sparing effect of tramadol dose per day, early therapeutic response rate compared with paracetamol/tramadol; which translates into faster pain relief, better adherence, less tramadol drug dependency, and a reduction of related AEs incidence. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT04968158.

2.
Pain Ther ; 2024 Sep 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39316284

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Multi-modal analgesia is desirable for the management of acute pain since it can provide effective pain relief at lower doses, thereby aiding tolerability. Co-crystal of tramadol-celecoxib (CTC) provides effective analgesia in models of acute pain. Co-crystallization can alter the pharmacokinetics of individual components, potentially improving tolerability. We sought to better understand the safety and tolerability of CTC in patients with acute postoperative pain. METHODS: We conducted a pooled analysis of safety data from three phase 3 randomized controlled trials in adults with acute moderate-to-severe pain following oral surgery, bunionectomy, and elective abdominal hysterectomy. We present data for CTC 200 mg twice daily (BID) and its comparators: tramadol 50 mg four times daily (QID) (one trial), tramadol 100 mg QID (two trials), celecoxib 100 mg BID (two trials), and placebo (three trials). RESULTS: In total, n = 551 patients received CTC 200 mg BID, n = 183 received tramadol 50 mg QID, n = 368 received tramadol 100 mg QID, n = 388 received celecoxib 100 mg BID, and n = 274 received placebo. The prevalence of adverse events (AEs) related to study drug up to 48 h was numerically lower with CTC 200 mg BID (35.9%) than with tramadol 50 mg QID (47.5%) and 100 mg QID (44.8%) but greater than with celecoxib 100 mg BID (12.4%) and placebo (20.4%). The most frequent AEs related to study drug up to 48 h were somnolence, nausea, dizziness, and vomiting, which occurred more frequently in patients receiving tramadol 100 mg QID than in those receiving CTC 200 mg BID. CONCLUSION: CTC 200 mg BID appears to be better tolerated than tramadol 100 mg QID, possibly because of reduced total exposure to tramadol. This may contribute to a more favorable benefit-risk profile for CTC versus individual components, making it a promising treatment for acute pain. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT03108482, NCT02982161 (EudraCT: 2016-000592-24), NCT03062644 (EudraCT: 2016-000593-38).

3.
J Pharm Health Care Sci ; 10(1): 58, 2024 Sep 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39300518

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Multimodal analgesia (MMA) is recommended for postoperative pain management; however, studies evaluating the effect of tramadol-including MMA on numerical rating scale (NRS)-based postoperative pain levels and the length of stay (LOS) in the hospital are limited. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the before and after effects of tramadol-including MMA application, and assess its effect on postoperative NRS scores and LOS. METHODS: Patients who underwent spinal surgery under general anesthesia at the Rakuwakai Marutamachi Hospital in fiscal years 2020 and 2022 were included in this study. The outcomes between the pre- and post-intervention groups were compared through propensity score matching. RESULTS: Following propensity score matching, 249 patients were included in each group. MMA application significantly decreased the median LOS from 10 to 9 days (p < 0.001). Additionally, the median NRS scores exhibited a significant decrease from 4 to 3 on postoperative day (POD) 3 (p = 0.0109) and from 3 to 2 on POD 5 (p = 0.0087). Following MMA application, the number of patients receiving additional analgesics decreased significantly, from 38 to 6 (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of tramadol-including MMA can effectively reduce postoperative pain and decrease the LOS for patients undergoing spinal surgery.

4.
Chemosphere ; 364: 143307, 2024 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39260597

ABSTRACT

Opioids are widely distributed, potent prescription analgesics that are known to be diverted for illicit use. Their prevalence of use is reflected by high concentrations of parent compounds and/or metabolites found in samples collected from wastewater treatment plants. Given that treatment byproducts enter the environment through several routes, the consequences of insufficient removal by treatment methods include unwanted environmental exposure and potential to disrupt ecosystems. Activated sludge treatment has been widely investigated for a large suite of prescription opioids but the same cannot be said for UV and chlorination. Additionally, the biosolid cycle of opioids has been overlooked previously. This study aimed to determine the extent to which secondary and tertiary wastewater treatment methods remove opioids from influent, and the associated environmental exposure for those persistent, as well as the fate of opioids in biosolids. Membrane bioreactor treatment proved effective for natural and semi-synthetic opioids while the effect of UV treatment was negligible. Chlorination was the most effective treatment method resulting in effluent with concentrations below theoretical predicted no-effect concentration. Biosolids are not subjected to any additional biological or chemical treatment after membrane bioreactor treatment and the levels detected in biosolid used as fertiliser had several opioids at potentially hazardous concentrations, indicated by a QSAR theoretical model. This data indicates a potential issue regarding the treatment process of biosolids and reliance on chlorination for effluent treatment that should be investigated in other treatment plants.


Subject(s)
Analgesics, Opioid , Sewage , Waste Disposal, Fluid , Wastewater , Water Pollutants, Chemical , Wastewater/chemistry , Analgesics, Opioid/analysis , Water Pollutants, Chemical/analysis , Waste Disposal, Fluid/methods , Sewage/chemistry , Bioreactors , Halogenation , Ultraviolet Rays
5.
Indian J Clin Biochem ; 39(4): 489-505, 2024 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39346718

ABSTRACT

Tramadol is a pain killing drug highly used worldwide. There is a knowledge gap for fertility consequences of analgesic addiction in men. In this observational study, we investigated the hazards of tramadol abuse on human male reproductive function. A total of 30 tramadol addicts and 30 healthy controls have participated in the study. History and clinical examination of the included subjects were performed. Biochemical and molecular assays were measured in all participants include serum reproductive hormones (calculated free testosterone, FSH, LH, prolactin and estradiol) using ELISA techniques, semen analysis, seminal plasma zinc and selenium assays using colorimetric kits, seminal plasma tramadol concentrations using Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS), and seminal plasma 8-hydroxyguanosine (8-OHG) using high performance liquid chromatography were measured. Tramadol abuse significantly decreased semen parameters quality. Additionally, tramadol abuse significantly decreased testosterone (P = 0.001) and increased prolactin serum levels (P = 0.000). Tramadol abusers showed significantly higher levels of 8-OHG (P < 0.0001) with significantly lower levels of zinc and selenium in their seminal plasma compared with the controls (P < 0.0001, and 0.0002 respectively). Also, tramadol addicts displayed positive correlations between seminal plasma levels of 8-OHG (r = 0.905, P = 0.00) and sperm abnormal forms (r = 0.610, P = 0.000) with seminal plasma tramadol levels. Seminal plasma levels of zinc (r = - 0.815, P = 0.00), sperm motility (r = - 0.484, P = 0.007), and vitality (r = - 0.430, P = 0.018) were negatively correlated with seminal plasma levels of tramadol. Our data suggest that tramadol abuse may impair male fertility by increasing oxidative damage of sperms and reducing testosterone and the antioxidants trace elements in testicular tissues. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12291-023-01141-4.

6.
J Pain ; : 104672, 2024 Sep 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39245196

ABSTRACT

Pain is perceived not only by personal experience but also vicariously. Pain empathy is the ability to share and understand other's intentions and emotions in their painful conditions, which can be divided into cognitive and emotional empathy. It remains unclear how centrally acting analgesics would modulate brain activity related to pain empathy and which component of pain empathy would be altered by analgesics. In this study, we examined the effects of the analgesic tramadol on the brain activity for pain empathy in healthy adults. We used 2 tasks to assess brain activity for pain empathy. In experiment 1, we used a well-established picture-based pain empathy task involving passive observation of other's pain. In experiment 2, we developed a novel pain empathy task to assess brain activity during cognitive and emotional empathy for pain separately in a single task. We conducted a double-blind, placebo-controlled within-subject crossover study with functional magnetic resonance imaging for 33 participants in experiment 1 and 31 participants in experiment 2, respectively. In experiment 1, we found that tramadol decreased activation in the supramarginal gyrus during observation of other's pain compared with placebo. Supramarginal gyrus activation correlated negatively with the thermal pain threshold. In experiment 2, we found that tramadol decreased activation in angular gyrus in cognitive empathy for pain compared with placebo but did not change brain activity in emotional empathy for pain. PERSPECTIVE: Centrally acting analgesics such as tramadol may have not only analgesic effects on self-experienced pain but also on the complex neural processing of pain empathy.

7.
Cancers (Basel) ; 16(17)2024 Aug 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39272873

ABSTRACT

Advancements in understanding pain physiopathology have historically challenged animals' absence of pain senses. Studies have demonstrated that animals have comparable neural pain pathways, suggesting that cats and dogs likely experience pain similarly to humans. Understanding brain circuits for effective pain control has been crucial to adjusting pain management to the patient's individual responses and current condition. The refinement of analgesic strategies is necessary to better cater to the patient's demands. Cancer pain management searches to ascertain analgesic protocols that enhance patient well-being by minimizing or abolishing pain and reducing its impact on the immune system and cancer cells. Due to their ability to reduce nerve sensitivity, opioids are the mainstay for managing moderate and severe acute pain; however, despite their association with tumor progression, specific opioid agents have immune-protective properties and are considered safe alternatives to analgesia for cancer patients.

8.
Cell J ; 26(6): 380-391, 2024 Aug 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39154238

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Dysregulation of lipid and carbohydrate/fatty acid (FA) balance in Sertoli and germ cells alters the NADP+/ NADPH ratio, resulting in metabolic autophagy in testicles. Tramadol (TRA) adversely affects spermatogenesis development, and it is not reversed within short periods of time after withdrawal. Therefore, the present study aimed to examine the boosting effect of different exercise training protocols (ETPs) on TRA-induced detrimental effects after withdrawal. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this experimental study, 36 mature Wistar rats were separated into control and TRAsole (administered 40 mg/kg of TRA and euthanized 60 days after TRA administration), Con-TRA (stopped TRA administration after 60 days, and continued for additional 60 days after withdrawal), TRA+low-intensity (TRA+LICT), TRA+ moderate-intensity (TRA+MICT), and TRA+high-intensity continuous (TRA+HICT) ETPs-induced groups (n=6/ group, ETPs were initiated for 60 days after stopping TRA administration). Next, the intracytoplasmic carbohydrate and lipids/FAs content, testicular lactate and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels, relative ratios of NADP+/NADPH, serum testosterone levels, and the Leydig cells steroidogenic activity, the mRNA levels of Beclin-1, p62, LC3-I, and Atg7 as well as the LC3-I/II+ germ and somatic cells mean distributions were analyzed. RESULTS: The LICT and MICT could ameliorate the TRA-induced carbohydrates/lipids, FAs imbalance, increase lactate, LDH and testosterone levels, re-balance the NADP+/NADPH ratio, and reregulate the autophagy and steroidogenic activities in the Leydig and Sertoli cells. CONCLUSION: Collectively, LICT and MICT can ameliorate the TRA-induced metabolic-oxidative autophagy by rebalancing energy survey in testicles and down-regulating autophagy reactions in Sertoli cells and rebalancing it in the Leydig cells.

9.
Int J Mol Sci ; 25(16)2024 Aug 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39201627

ABSTRACT

Tramdol is one of most popular opioids used for postoperative analgesia worldwide. Among Arabic countries, there are reports that its dosage is not appropriate due to cultural background. To provide theoretical background of the proper usage of tramadol, this study analyzed the association between several genetic polymorphisms (CYP2D6/OPRM1) and the effect of tramadol. A total of 39 patients who took tramadol for postoperative analgesia were recruited, samples were obtained, and their DNA was extracted for polymerase chain reaction products analysis followed by allelic variations of CYP2D6 and OPRM A118G determination. Numerical pain scales were measured before and 1 h after taking tramadol. The effect of tramadol was defined by the difference between these scales. We concluded that CYP2D6 and OPRM1 A118G single nucleotide polymorphisms may serve as crucial determinants in predicting tramadol efficacy and susceptibility to post-surgical pain. Further validation of personalized prescription practices based on these genetic polymorphisms could provide valuable insights for the development of clinical guidelines tailored to post-surgical tramadol use in the Arabic population.


Subject(s)
Analgesics, Opioid , Arabs , Cytochrome P-450 CYP2D6 , Pain, Postoperative , Receptors, Opioid, mu , Tramadol , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Arabs/genetics , Cytochrome P-450 CYP2D6/genetics , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Pain, Postoperative/genetics , Pharmacogenetics/methods , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide , Receptors, Opioid, mu/genetics , Tramadol/therapeutic use
10.
Cureus ; 16(7): e64341, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39130857

ABSTRACT

Angioedema is a non-pitting edema that involves the subcutaneous and submucosal layers of the face, lips, neck, oral cavity, larynx, and gut. It may become life-threatening when it involves tissues of the larynx. Angioedema can be triggered by exposure to drugs such as angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE inhibitors), opioid drugs, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Tramadol is an opioid analgesic medication that may also induce angioedema, but the incidence of tramadol-induced angioedema is very rare in literature to date. It has been postulated that tramadol may cause fatal angioedema in the presence of underlying diseases such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) or concomitant drugs such as NSAIDs. We describe the case of a patient with SLE who experienced fatal angioedema following tramadol intake.

11.
Palliat Med Rep ; 5(1): 340-349, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39144134

ABSTRACT

Background: Tramadol is known to provide synergistic analgesia when used in combination with morphine. Objectives: The aims of this study were: (1) to introduce an opioid combination therapy using pure-µ-opioid receptor agonist (OPI) + tramadol injections (OPI + tramadol) and (2) to elucidate safety and efficacy of this combination therapy for opioid-naïve cancer pain patients. Methods: Opioid-naïve patients referred to our palliative care team (in Japan) who were unable to take oral medications and received OPI + tramadol as opioid induction agents were retrospectively investigated on the electric medical chart. OPI + tramadol dosage was adjusted to achieve the patient's pain as Numerical Rating Scale ≤4/10 or Support Team Assessment Schedule-Japanese ≤1. Patients' demography, doses of OPI and tramadol administered, and adverse events were analyzed. Results: A total of 44 patients were included. The primary organs of malignancy were pancreas (11), stomach (5), lung (4), breast (4), liver (4), and others (13). OPI injections administered were hydromorphone (39), morphine (6), oxycodone (1), and fentanyl (1). The starting doses of OPI (morphine equivalent) and tramadol were 6.05 ± 1.63 and 67.8 ± 13.6 mg/day, respectively, and the final doses of OPI (morphine equivalent) and tramadol were 8.14 ± 3.85 and 80.0 ± 28.5 mg/day, respectively. Treatment goals were achieved in all patients. There were three patients in whom OPI was switched owing to inadequate analgesia and no new side effects other than those known to occur when OPI or tramadol is administered appeared. Conclusion: The results suggest that this innovative and unique opioid therapy can be safely and effectively introduced to opioid-naïve cancer patients who are relatively close to the end of life.

12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39177129

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Pain is a disturbing sensory and emotive sentiment triggered mainly by tissue-damaging stimuli. This study aimed to evaluate the potential effect of tramadol and nefopam on acute pain. METHODS: Thirty Sprague-Dawley rats (each 200-250 g) were randomly allocated into three sets (n=10). The nefopam group was treated with nefopam (3.5 mg/kg) by intraperitoneal (IP) injection; the tramadol group was given tramadol (50mg/kg) by IP injection, and the control group was treated with normal saline. Two main methods were proposed for assessing and monitoring rat pain: hot plate and tail-flick techniques using tail immersion. RESULTS: It was revealed a significant change (p<0.0001) in the outcome in the animal groups that received nefopam (3.5mg/kg/IP) and tramadol (50mg/kg/IP) in the prospect of hot plate test (hand paw lick parameter) and tail flick test. Regarding the hot plate test (jumping parameter), there was no significant change (p>0.05) in animals treated with tramadol and nefopam compared to the control group. Moreover, a considerable difference between the hot plate test (hand paw lick parameter) and the tail-flick test was detected between tramadol and nefopam-treated groups. However, no significant variance (P=0.101) was detected between the two groups in the hot plate test (jumping parameter). CONCLUSION: Tramadol showed better analgesic activity over nefopam in suppressing pain stimuli in acute settings with modest to severe pain, making tramadol a favourable choice for short-term management of postoperative pain.

13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39168825

ABSTRACT

Tramadol is a weak opioid used to treat moderate pain. Stronger opioids inhibit gastrointestinal function, but little is known about the gastrointestinal effects of tramadol. Our aim was to investigate if tramadol causes opioid-induced bowel dysfunction (OIBD). Twenty healthy male participants (mean age 24 [range 20-31] years) were included. Tramadol (extended-release formulation, 200 mg/day) or placebo was administered for 10 days in two study periods separated by 3 weeks. Gastrointestinal transit times and segmental volume, motility and water content were investigated with the 3D-transit system and magnetic resonance imaging. Bowel movements and gastrointestinal symptoms were recorded daily. Tramadol prolonged colonic transit time (34 h vs. 25 h, p < 0.001) and increased small bowel motility (p < 0.01) and water content (p = 0.002) compared to placebo. Across all days of treatment, tramadol reduced the number of mean daily bowel movements (p = 0.001) and increased mean stool consistency (p = 0.006). Gastrointestinal symptom scores increased with tramadol (indigestion: +358%, p = 0.01; constipation: +475%, p = 0.01). Additionally, more participants fulfilled the diagnostic criteria for constipation after tramadol treatment compared to placebo (40% vs. 0%, p < 0.001). This study showed that tramadol treatment is associated with OIBD, and management of constipation and other bowel symptoms should, therefore, be prioritised when treating pain patients with tramadol.

14.
J Biochem Mol Toxicol ; 38(9): e23777, 2024 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39165170

ABSTRACT

Tramadol (TR), a commonly prescribed pain reliever for moderate to severe pain, has been associated with kidney damage. This study investigates TR-induced nephrotoxicity mechanisms, focusing on its effects on renal proximal tubular cells (PTCs). The study findings demonstrate that TR disrupts PTC bioenergetic processes, leading to oxidative stress and inflammation. Significant toxicity to PTCs was observed with estimated effective concentration 50 values of 9.8 and 11.5 µM based on 3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide and lactate dehydrogenase assays, respectively. TR also interferes with the function of PTC transporters, including organic cation uptake transporter 1, organic cation transporter 2, P-glycoprotein, and multidrug resistance protein 2. Furthermore, bioenergetics assays showed that TR reduced the activities of mitochondrial complexes I and III, adenosine triphosphate production, mitochondrial membrane potential, and oxygen consumption rate while increasing lactate release. TR also increased the production of reactive oxygen species, lipid peroxidation thiobarbituric acid reactive substances end products, and the expression of the NRf2 gene while decreasing reduced glutathione (GSH-R) stores and catalase and superoxide dismutase antioxidant activities. Additionally, TR increased the production of inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α and IL-6) and their coding genes expression. Interestingly, the study found that antioxidants like GSH-R, inhibitors of IL-6 and TNF-α, and mitochondrial activating Co-Q10 could protect cells against TR-induced cytotoxicity. The study suggests that TR causes nephrotoxicity by disrupting bioenergetic processes, causing oxidative stress and inflammation, but antioxidants and agents targeting mitochondria may have protective and curative potential.


Subject(s)
Energy Metabolism , Inflammation , Oxidative Stress , Tramadol , Oxidative Stress/drug effects , Inflammation/chemically induced , Inflammation/metabolism , Tramadol/adverse effects , Tramadol/pharmacology , Energy Metabolism/drug effects , Kidney Tubules, Proximal/metabolism , Kidney Tubules, Proximal/drug effects , Kidney Tubules, Proximal/pathology , Humans , Cell Line , Animals , Analgesics, Opioid/adverse effects , Analgesics, Opioid/pharmacology
15.
Heliyon ; 10(15): e35070, 2024 Aug 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39170468

ABSTRACT

Introduction: The presence of phytochemicals in herbal medicines can lead to herb-drug interactions, altering the levels of these compounds and conventional drugs in the bloodstream by influencing CYP450 activity. Considering curcumin's effect on the CYP enzymes responsible for tramadol metabolism, it is essential to assess the potential interaction between curcumin and tramadol when administered together. Materials and methods: The pharmacokinetics of tramadol were examined in rats receiving either single or multiple doses of curcumin (80 mg/kg) compared to rats without curcumin treatment. Tramadol liver perfusion was conducted on all rat groups and perfusate samples were collected at specified intervals. Tramadol and its main metabolite were detected using an HPLC system coupled with a fluorescence detector. Results: Tramadol concentrations were notably higher in the co-administered group compared to both the control and treatment groups. Conversely, lower concentrations of M1 were observed in the co-administered and treatment groups compared to the control group. The AUC0-60 parameters for tramadol were as follows: 32944.8 ± 1355.5, 22925.7 ± 1650.1, and 36548.0 ± 2808.4 ng⋅min/ml for the control, treatment, and co-administered groups, respectively. Both the co-administered and treatment groups exhibited a lower AUC0-60 of M1 compared to the control group. The lack of significant difference in Cmax and AUC0-60 of M1 between the treatment and co-administered groups suggests that single and multiple doses of curcumin have comparable effects on CYP2D6. Conclusions: These results indicate a potential for drug interactions when curcumin and tramadol are taken together. Furthermore, the influence of curcumin on tramadol metabolism varied between single and multiple oral administrations of curcumin. Hence, it is vital to highlight this interaction in clinical settings and conduct additional research to fully understand the clinical implications of combining curcumin and tramadol.

16.
Lung Cancer ; 194: 107888, 2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39043077

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of pregabalin combined with tramadol/paracetamol on acute pain in patients with CT-guided puncture localization of pulmonary nodules. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this randomized, placebo-controlled and single-center study, 120 patients were allocated randomly to four groups: the control group (Group P), the pregabalin-placebo group (Group BP), the tramadol/paracetamol-placebo group (Group AP), and the pregabalin-tramadol/paracetamol group (Group AB). The primary outcome was the NRS (Numerical Rating Scale) score. Other outcomes included systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), heart rate (HR), pulse oxygen saturation (SpO2), the incidence of moderate to severe pain, the analgesia recovery ratio, the incidence of adverse drug reactions and patients' satisfaction. RESULTS: No significant interaction was detected between the interventions (P = 0.752). The NRS score of the Taking pregabalin group and the Taking tramadol/paracetamol group were significantly lower than those of the Not-taking pregabalin group and the Not-taking tramadol/paracetamol group respectively (P < 0.05). There was significant difference in the NRS scores among the four groups (P < 0.001). The NRS score of Group AB was significantly lower than that of Group P (P < 0.001), Group BP (P < 0.001) and Group AP (P = 0.001). At the same time, the NRS scores of Group BP (P < 0.001) and Group AP (P < 0.001) were significantly lower than those of Group P, but there was no significant difference between Group BP and Group AP (P = 1.000). The SBP, DBP, HR, the incidence of moderate to severe pain and the analgesia recovery ratio of Group AB were significantly lower than those of Group P (P < 0.05), while the SpO2 and the number of people who were very satisfied were significantly higher than those of Group P (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse drug reactions among the four groups (P = 0.272). CONCLUSIONS: The combination or single use of pregabalin and tramadol/paracetamol can effectively relieve the acute pain after localization. Pregabalin combined with tramadol/paracetamol has the best analgesic effect and significantly reduces the hemodynamic fluctuations, with high safety and low incidence of adverse drug reactions, which has a certain clinical popularization and application value.


Subject(s)
Acetaminophen , Acute Pain , Pregabalin , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Tramadol , Humans , Tramadol/administration & dosage , Tramadol/therapeutic use , Tramadol/adverse effects , Pregabalin/therapeutic use , Pregabalin/administration & dosage , Pregabalin/adverse effects , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Acetaminophen/administration & dosage , Acetaminophen/therapeutic use , Acetaminophen/adverse effects , Acute Pain/drug therapy , Acute Pain/etiology , Acute Pain/diagnosis , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Aged , Drug Therapy, Combination , Adult , Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , Analgesics/administration & dosage , Analgesics/therapeutic use , Analgesics/adverse effects , Punctures/adverse effects , Punctures/methods , Treatment Outcome , Analgesics, Opioid/administration & dosage , Analgesics, Opioid/adverse effects , Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Pain Management/methods , Solitary Pulmonary Nodule/diagnostic imaging , Solitary Pulmonary Nodule/drug therapy , Solitary Pulmonary Nodule/pathology , Pain Measurement
17.
Cureus ; 16(6): e62518, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39022473

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Tramadol (TRA) is an opioid analgesic widely prescribed for moderate-to-severe pain; however, its abuse and chronic use have been associated with kidney damage. Considering the protective role of exercise training in reducing organ damage, this study aimed to assess the influence of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) on a male rat's kidney following chronic TRA administration. METHODS: In this experimental study, 30 male Wistar rats were assigned to the following groups: control (CON; animals received normal saline five days a week in the first month and three days a week in the second month), exercise (EXE; animals conducted HIIT training according to exercise protocol five days a week for two months), TRA (animals received TRA 50 mg/kg (i.p.) as described for the CON group), EXE-TRA (animals received TRA and conducted exercise protocol), and EXE-SL (animals received normal saline and conducted exercise protocol). Then, serum IL-6 and IL-10 levels, tissue malondialdehyde (MDA), total antioxidant capacity (TAC), glutathione peroxidase (GPx), superoxide dismutase (SOD), and levels of albumin, urea, and creatinine (CR), along with pathological changes in the kidney, were measured. A p-value of <0.05 was considered significant using GraphPad Prism v.9 (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, California, USA). RESULTS: The inflammatory cytokines IL-6 and IL-10 were significantly increased in the EXE and EXE-TRA groups compared to the TRA group. Chronic administration of TRA in the TRA group decreased antioxidant indicators TAC, GPx, and SOD in kidney tissue while increasing oxidative stress MDA compared to the CON group (p<0.05). In contrast, the EXE-TRA group showed higher levels of TAC, GPx, and SOD, while MDA decreased compared to the TRA group. Additionally, serum levels of urea and CR were increased in the TRA group compared to the CON group, whereas these levels were decreased in the EXE-TRA group compared to the TRA group. The inflammatory effect of HIIT training, due to severe hyperemia and mild inflammatory cell infiltration, was seen in all EXE groups. Pathological findings confirmed TRA-induced kidney damage through moderate hyaline cast presence and severe apoptosis in the TRA group. Other findings were in line with the above results. CONCLUSION: These findings confirm the nephrotoxicity of chronic use of TRA through biochemical and oxidative markers and pathological outcomes. In addition, the result suggests that HIIT has the potential to mitigate the detrimental effects of TRA through reversing biochemical and oxidative markers, including TRA-induced apoptosis. Consequently, considering its restorative properties, HIIT could be explored as a prospective nephroprotective approach for long-term TRA treatment.

18.
Pain Pract ; 2024 Jul 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38956758

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In the randomized, phase 3, SUSA-301 trial, celecoxib-tramadol co-crystal (CTC) provided significantly greater analgesia compared with celecoxib, tramadol, or placebo in adults with acute, moderate-to-severe, postoperative pain. This post hoc, secondary analysis further evaluated the use of rescue medication and the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). METHODS: Patients (N = 637) were randomized 2:2:2:1 to receive oral CTC 200 mg twice daily (BID; n = 184), tramadol 50 mg four times daily (QID; n = 183), celecoxib 100 mg BID (n = 181), or placebo QID (n = 89). Post hoc analyses were conducted on the use of rescue medications up to 4 and 48 h post-study drug dose, stratified by baseline pain intensity (moderate/severe), and on the incidence of TEAEs, stratified by rescue medication use. RESULTS: A significantly lower proportion of patients received any rescue medication within 4 h post-study dose with CTC (49.5%) versus tramadol (61.7%, p = 0.0178), celecoxib (65.2%, p = 0.0024), and placebo (75.3%, p = 0.0001); this was also seen for oxycodone use. Fewer patients in the CTC group received ≥3 doses of rescue medication compared with the other groups, irrespective of baseline pain intensity. In patients who did not receive opioid rescue medication, CTC was associated with a lower incidence of nausea and vomiting TEAEs versus tramadol alone. In patients who received rescue oxycodone, the incidence of nausea was similar in the CTC and tramadol groups, and higher versus celecoxib and placebo. CONCLUSION: Celecoxib-tramadol co-crystal was associated with reduced rescue medication use and an acceptable tolerability profile compared with tramadol or celecoxib alone in adults with acute, moderate-to-severe, postoperative pain.

19.
Electrophoresis ; 2024 Jul 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38962846

ABSTRACT

Water hyacinth plants (Eichhornia crassipes Mart.) collected from two South African rivers were analyzed in order to investigate their suitability for judging the presence of pharmaceuticals in the water. Thereby, a number of drugs, including amitriptyline, atenolol, citalopram, orphenadrine, lidocaine, telmisartan, and tramadol, could be detected. Particularly for the latter substance, relatively high concentrations (more than 5000 ng g-1 dry plant material) were detected in the water plants. Subsequently, the plant extracts were also screened for drug-derived transformation products, whereby a series of phase-one metabolites could be tentatively identified.

20.
J Pharmacol Sci ; 156(1): 30-37, 2024 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39068032

ABSTRACT

We aimed to examine the efficacy of combination therapies of Neurotropin® with tramadol and Neurotropin with mirogabalin for neuropathic pain management. A neuropathic pain model (L5 spinal nerve ligation model: L5-SNL) using male Wistar rats was generated through tight ligation of the left fifth lumbar nerve using silk sutures. Mechanical allodynia was assessed using the 50% paw withdrawal threshold. The combined antiallodynic effects were evaluated using isobolographic analyses. Small intestinal transit was evaluated using the charcoal meal test, and motor coordination using the rota-rod test. Neurotropin (50-200 NU/kg, p.o.), tramadol (7.5-60 mg/kg, p.o.), and mirogabalin (3-30 mg/kg, p.o.) showed a dose-dependent antiallodynic effect in L5-SNL rats. The combined antiallodynic effects of Neurotropin and tramadol were additive or synergistic, whereas those of Neurotropin and mirogabalin were additive. Neurotropin (100-400 NU/kg, p.o.) did not affect the small intestinal transit, whereas tramadol (30-100 mg/kg, p.o.) significantly inhibited it. Neurotropin (100-400 NU/kg, p.o.) did not affect the walking time, whereas mirogabalin (10-100 mg/kg, p.o.) significantly decreased it. Neurotropin dose-dependently ameliorated mechanical allodynia in rats, and combination therapy with Neurotropin-tramadol or Neurotropin-mirogabalin may alleviate neuropathic pain without aggravating the adverse effects of tramadol and mirogabalin.


Subject(s)
Disease Models, Animal , Hyperalgesia , Neuralgia , Rats, Wistar , Spinal Nerves , Tramadol , Animals , Tramadol/administration & dosage , Tramadol/pharmacology , Male , Neuralgia/drug therapy , Hyperalgesia/drug therapy , Spinal Nerves/drug effects , Ligation/adverse effects , Drug Therapy, Combination , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Rats , Gastrointestinal Transit/drug effects , Analgesics, Opioid/administration & dosage , Analgesics, Opioid/pharmacology , Bridged Bicyclo Compounds , Polysaccharides
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL