Transradial approach for middle meningeal artery embolization is a safe alternative to transfemoral approach in patients with chronic subdural hematoma: A single-center retrospective comparative study.

BACKGROUND: Transradial approach (TRA) has been increasingly utilized in various neuroendovascular interventions as a safe alternative to the transfemoral approach (TFA). As middle meningeal artery (MMA) embolization emerges as an effective therapy for treating chronic subdural hematomas (cSDH), some studies have explored using TRA. In this study, we compared procedural times and post-operative outcomes between those with TRA and TFA. METHODS: This is a single-institution retrospective study of patients undergoing MMA embolization for cSDH. The cohort was divided into the TRA and TFA subgroups. Baseline characteristics, procedural times, and immediate outcomes were compared. Univariate analysis was performed. RESULTS: We performed 62 MMA embolizations for treatment of cSDH, of which 37 (59.7 %) were performed transradial and 25 (40.3 %) were performed transfemoral. Those who underwent TRA were significantly younger than those who had TFA (p = 0.02). For patients who underwent unilateral MMA embolization, those with TRA had significantly shorter duration of procedure compared to the TRF group (p = 0.01). This difference was not observed in the bilateral MMA embolization subgroup. Only three patients had access site complications, and all were in the TFA group. There was no significant difference in length of hospital stay. CONCLUSION: As MMA embolization for cSDH becomes more prevalent, efforts to optimize the safety and efficacy of the technical aspects become critical. In this study we demonstrate that TRA is a safe and efficient alternative to traditional TFA in those undergoing unilateral MMA embolization.

Transradial versus transfemoral access for middle meningeal artery embolization: Choice of the access route considering delirium in the elderly.

Background: Treatment of chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) with middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE) is becoming well established. Transradial artery access (TRA) is considered less invasive than transfemoral artery access (TFA) and is increasingly indicated in the field of endovascular therapy. Therefore, this study focused on postoperative delirium and compared access routes. Methods: This is a single-center and retrospective study. The strategy was to perform MMAE for CSDH with symptomatic recurrence at our hospital. Cases from July 2018 to September 2022, when MMAE was introduced in our hospital, were included in this study. Patients were divided into TRA and TFA groups and were compared descriptively for patient background, procedure duration, and incidence of postoperative delirium. Results: Twenty-five patients underwent MMAE, of whom 12 (48%) were treated with TRA. The overall median age was 82 years, with no clear differences between the TRA and TFA groups in the presence or absence of preexisting dementia or antithrombotic therapy. Delirium requiring medication tended to be lower in the TRA group: 2/12 (16.7%) in the TRA group versus 6/13 (46.2%) in the TFA group, and the mean procedure time for patients undergoing bilateral MMAE was 151 min (interquartile range [IQR]: 140-173 min) in the TRA group versus 174 min (IQR: 137-205 min) in the TFA group. Conclusion: TRA was associated with an overall shorter procedure time than TFA. MMAE through TRA tended to have a lower incidence of delirium. MMAE through TRA may be useful in recurrent CSDH with a high elderly population.

Transradial and Transfemoral Access for Retrograde Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: A Comparison of the Clinical Features and Prognostic Implications.

Objective: The research was carried out to determine and compare the efficiency of completely transradial access (cTRA) and transfemoral access (TFA) in retrograde chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Background: The cases of retrograde chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention usually need the dual access. The transradial method is now used more frequently in CTO PCI, and improves the safety of CTO PCI. Methods: This retrospective, observational study was carried out in a single center. Participants were patients who underwent dual-access retrograde CTO PCI from January 2017 to October 2023, categorized into two groups: cTRA (biradial access) and TFA (bifemoral, or combined radial and femoral access). All patients in the cTRA group received conventional radial access. All punctures of the femoral artery were performed without fluoroscopic or ultrasound guidance. None of the patients in the TFA group accepted any arterial closure devices. Clinical, angiographic and procedural characteristics and the occurrence of in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) of the cTRA and TFA procedures were recorded. Results: This research involved 187 CTO PCI procedures with dual access, of which 88 were done using cTRA and the rest (99) were carried out through TFA. The J-CTO (Multicenter Chronic Total Occlusion Registry of Japan) score was lower in the cTRA group than TFA group (2.1± 0.6 vs 3.0± 0.8; P <0.001). The technical success (84.1% vs 82.8%; P= 0.817), procedural success (80.7% vs 79.8%; P= 0.906) and in-hospital MACE rates (5.7% vs 4.0%; P= 0.510) were the same for both groups. For a J-CTO score of 3 or higher, technical success rate was significantly lower in the cTRA group than the TFA group (58.1% vs 74.2%; P < 0.001). Conclusion: In the retrograde CTO PCI, the percentages of success and in-hospital MACE were similar for both cTRA and TFA. Meanwhile, cTRA may be used for simpler lesions (J-CTO score < 3) as compared to TFA.

Nursing of forearm hematoma after transradial coronary intervention.

Background: Complications such as forearm hematoma after coronary intervention through the radial artery are a common complication. Material and methods: By observing, describing, and analyzing the pictures taken during clinical diagnosis and consultation, we summarize the prevention, treatment, and nursing of forearm hematoma after percutaneous coronary intervention, to provide reference for the nursing of patients with forearm hematoma. Results: We have innovatively summarized the risk classification of forearm hematoma and the three key time points for preventing hematoma. Conclusion: Complications such as forearm hematoma after coronary intervention through the radial artery are a common complication. We have innovatively summarized the risk classification of forearm hematoma and the three key time points for preventing hematoma, providing reference for the prevention and management of forearm hematoma in clinical practice. For patients undergoing transradial coronary intervention, the three key time points for preventing hematoma and symptomatic management based the risk classification of forearm hematoma are crucial.

Comparative Analysis of Right vs. Left Radial Access in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Impact on Silent Cerebral Ischemia.

Background and Objectives: Silent cerebral ischemia (SCI) is defined as a condition that can be detected by biochemical markers or cranial imaging methods but does not produce clinical symptom. This study aims both to compare the frequency of SCI in PCIs performed with right transradial access and left transradial access and to evaluate the influencing factors. Materials and Methods: A prospective, single-center study included 197 patients undergoing PCI via transradial access between November 2020 and July 2022. The patients were categorized into right radial and left radial groups. Neuron-specific enolase (NSE) values were measured and recorded before and 18 h after the procedure. A post-procedure NSE level higher than 20 ng/dL was defined as SCI. Results: SCI occurred in 60 of the 197 patients. NSE elevation was observed in 37.4% (n = 37) of the right radial group and in 23.5% (n = 23) of the left radial group (p = 0.032). Patients with SCI had higher rates of smoking (p = 0.043), presence of subclavian tortuosity (p = 0.027), and HbA1c (p = 0.031). In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, the level of EF (ejection fraction) (OR: 0.958 95% CI 0.920-0.998, p = 0.039), right radial preference (OR: 2.104 95% CI 1.102-3.995 p = 0.023), and smoking (OR: 2.088 95% CI 1.105-3.944, p = 0.023) were observed as independent variables of NSE elevation. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that PCI via right radial access poses a greater risk of SCI compared to left radial access. Anatomical considerations and technical challenges associated with right radial procedures and factors such as smoking and low ejection fraction contribute to this elevated risk.

Anatomical navigational difficulties in transradial right carotid artery stenting with 7-F Optimo balloon guide catheter.

OBJECTIVES: Carotid artery stenting (CAS) using a 7-F Optimo balloon guide catheter (BGC) via the right radial artery (RA) was performed for stenosis of the right carotid artery. The factors affecting the difficulty in navigating the BGC from the right RA to the right common carotid artery (CCA) were investigated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For 40 cases of stenosis of the right carotid artery, CAS using a 7-F Optimo BGC via the right RA was performed. Pre-operative anatomical length and angle of the access route were retrospectively examined. RESULTS: The 7-F Optimo BGC successfully reached all lesions; however, navigational difficulties were encountered in seven out of 40 cases (17.5%). One case in the difficult group experienced an ischemic complication. The height from the topmost point of the subclavian artery (SA) to the origin of the SA (SA height) was 44.4 mm versus 28.1 mm (p < 0.01), and the angle between the SA and the CCA (SA-CCA angle) was 21.6° versus 47.9° (p < 0.01) in the difficult and easy groups, respectively. For lesions with difficult navigation, the sensitivity and specificity of the SA height >34 mm were 100% and 82%, and the sensitivity and specificity of the SA-CCA angle <30° were 100% and 82%. CONCLUSIONS: For stenosis of the right carotid artery, transradial-CAS using a 7-F Optimo BGC is a safe procedure. However, navigating the BGC becomes difficult when the SA height is >34 mm and the SA-CCA angle is <30°.

Intra-arterial nicardipine versus verapamil during transradial access coronary catheterization.

INTRODUCTION: Intra-arterial (IA) vasodilators are recommended during transradial access (TRA) to prevent radial artery spasm (RAS). The American Heart Association (AHA) recommends either IA verapamil, diltiazem, nicardipine, or nitroglycerin to prevent RAS. To our knowledge, the efficacy of RAS prevention and patient tolerability of verapamil and nicardipine has not been directly compared in a randomized fashion. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, single-blinded randomized clinical trial comparing the discomfort experienced by patients receiving either 400 µg of IA nicardipine (n = 26) or 5 mg of IA verapamil (n = 29). Patient discomfort and/or pain was assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) both before and after IA administration of nicardipine or verapamil. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant difference in mean change in VAS scores between the 2 groups, with an average increase in VAS score of 0.88 in the nicardipine group and 4.81 in the verapamil group (p < 0.0001). The overall rate of RAS was low in our study (5.5 %) with no significant difference in RAS incidence between the 2 groups (p = 0.465). The nicardipine group had 2 RAS cases (7.7 %), with 1 requiring a change in strategy (3.8 %). The verapamil group had 1 RAS case (3.4 %) that did not require a change in strategy. CONCLUSION: In this trial, we showed that nicardipine causes significantly less discomfort and pain compared to verapamil during IA administration for TRA cardiac catheterization.

Clinical Outcomes of Transradial vs Nontransradial Aortoiliac Endovascular Therapy.

BACKGROUND: The introduction of radial-specific equipment has made transradial (TR) aortoiliac (AI) endovascular therapy (EVT) more convenient. OBJECTIVES: The authors aimed to investigate the perioperative outcomes of the TR approach in patients undergoing AI EVT for symptomatic peripheral artery disease. METHODS: The COMFORT (Contemporary Strategy for Aortoiliac Intervention) registry was a prospective, multicenter, observational study enrolling patients with symptomatic peripheral artery disease undergoing AI EVT between January 2021 and June 2023. The primary outcome was perioperative complications, whereas the secondary outcomes included core laboratory-evaluated residual stenosis >30%, time to hemostasis, time to ambulation, 30-day patency, and 30-day limb symptoms. These outcomes were compared between TR and non-TR AI EVT after propensity score matching. RESULTS: The TR approach was selected for 231 of the 947 patients (24.3%). The TR approach was chosen more in patients with a higher ankle-brachial index, chronic total occlusion, aortic lesion, bare nitinol stent implantation, and plain angioplasty, whereas it was chosen less in patients with dialysis, a history of AI EVT, chronic limb-threatening ischemia, bilateral calcification, and simultaneous infrainguinal EVT (all P < 0.05). After propensity score matching, the incidence of perioperative complications did not differ significantly between the groups (TR group: 6.0% vs non-TR group: 5.1%; P = 0.69). The proportions of residual stenosis, 30-day patency, and 30-day limb symptoms were not significantly different (all P > 0.05); however, the time to hemostasis and the time to ambulation were shorter in the TR group (both P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Non-TR AI EVT and TR AI EVT using radial-specific equipment were associated with a similar risk of perioperative complications. The TR approach helps shorten the time required for hemostasis and ambulation.

Ultrasonographic Characterizations of Radial Artery for Transradial Approach in the Saudi Population: A Pilot Study.

Background The radial artery originates from the brachial artery at the level of the neck of the radius in the cubital fossa. It has multiple branches all over its course, and it is an important artery for multiple procedures across several fields. Objectives The objective of this article is to assess the size and characteristics of the radial artery in the Saudi population for the transradial approach. It aims to compare the diameters of the distal and proximal radial arteries using ultrasonography and determine the clinical significance of the findings in selecting an appropriate catheter size among different demographic groups. Additionally, the study aims to contrast the obtained results with international standards to provide a comprehensive analysis of the radial artery characteristics in the Saudi population. Methods A pilot study was conducted at a Medina region hospital in Madinah from December 2022 to July 2023. An ultrasonographic assessment of the right radial artery was performed on a sample of 45 volunteers. Results Our results showed a significantly larger mean diameter of the right ulnar artery in males compared to females. No other significant differences were observed in the characteristics of the right proximal radial artery (PRA), distal radial artery (DRA), or ulnar artery between genders. Significant differences in arterial characteristics were observed across different body mass index (BMI) categories for several parameters. Depth measurements in the right PRA displayed notable differences across age groups, and the ulnar artery showed significant variability among age categories. No statistically significant differences were found in arterial characteristics across smoking categories. Conclusion Our study on Saudi Arabian radial artery ultrasonography reveals potential clinical correlations, highlighting the influence of age and BMI on arterial characteristics. Further research is needed to confirm these findings and explore demographic determinants.

Outcomes with distal transradial access in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease.

Radial artery occlusion (RAO), a complication of transradial access, has an incidence of 4.0% to 9.1% in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) and may preclude its use creation of arteriovenous fistula. Distal transradial access (dTRA) has lower rates of RAO compared with TRA, but prior studies excluded patients with advanced CKD. This was a single center study of patients with advanced CKD who underwent coronary procedures with dTRA from January 1, 2019 to May 12, 2022 who were retrospectively evaluated for radial artery patency in follow-up with reverse Barbeau testing or repeat access of the artery. Of 71 patients, 66% were on hemodialysis and the remainder had CKD 3 to 5. Access was ultrasound-guided, and all received adequate spasmolytic therapy and patent hemostasis. Proximal radial arteries were patent in 100% of the patients at follow-up. Our data suggest that dTRA is safe for patients with advanced CKD and preserves radial artery patency.

Forearm access for carotid artery stenting using the dual protection of flow reversal and distal filter: Trans-forearm dual protection technique.

BACKGROUND: Although transfemoral carotid artery stenting (CAS) is widely performed for carotid stenosis, serious or even fatal complications such as embolic and access site complications can still occur. We devised a novel dual protection system with continuous flow reversal to the cephalic vein of the forearm in transradial CAS, referred to as the "trans-forearm dual protection" technique. METHODS: A 75-year-old man with a diagnosis of symptomatic left cervical internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis underwent CAS using the trans-forearm dual protection technique. RESULTS: A 4F sheath was introduced into the cephalic vein of the right forearm. After an 8F balloon-guiding catheter was navigated into the left common carotid artery (CCA) via right sheathless radial access, a distal filter protection device was advanced into the high cervical ICA. The 8F balloon-guiding catheter was inflated and connected to the 4F sheath with a blood filter interposed. Under the dual protection of flow reversal and distal filter, the CAS procedure was performed. The postprocedural course was uneventful. Diffusion-weighted imaging 2 days after the procedure showed no evidence of ischemic stroke. The patient was discharged home without any complications 1 week after the procedure. Carotid duplex ultrasound performed 9 months after the procedure showed no signs of restenosis. CONCLUSIONS: This method allows for CAS under the dual protection of flow reversal and filter device protection via the trans-forearm access, reducing the risk of embolism and access site complications. Therefore, the trans-forearm dual protection technique can be a useful option for CAS.

Procedural Feasibility and Peri-procedural Outcomes of Peripheral Endovascular Therapy via Transradial versus Transfemoral Access: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of transradial access for peripheral vascular interventions. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE and Embase. REVIEW METHODS: MEDLINE and Embase databases were searched to June 2023 to identify studies investigating the outcomes of peripheral vascular interventions in lower extremity, carotid, and visceral arteries via transradial vs. transfemoral access. The primary outcome was procedural failure rate. Secondary outcomes were total access site complications, minor and major bleeding, stroke, access vessel occlusion, procedural time, fluoroscopy time, and contrast volume. RESULTS: Eight randomised controlled trials and 29 observational studies yielded a total of 70 882 patients treated via transradial (n = 2 616) vs. transfemoral access (n = 68 338). The overall failure rate was 2.3 ± 0.7%, and the transradial approach was associated with a statistically significantly higher procedural failure rate than the transfemoral approach (3.9 ± 0.7% vs. 1.0 ± 0.3%; odds ratio [OR] 3.07, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.84 - 5.12; I2 = 32%; p < .001). Subgroup analysis showed the highest failure rate in lower extremity interventions with 12.4 ± 4.9% for transradial vs. 4.0 ± 1.2% for transfemoral access. Conversely, procedural complications were statistically significantly fewer with transradial access for total access site complications (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.45 - 0.91; I2 = 36%; p = .010). Minor bleeding was statistically significantly less with the transradial approach (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.31 - 0.86; I2 = 30%; p = .010), whereas major bleeding and stroke rates were similar. Transradial access had more access vessel occlusion than transfemoral access (1.9% ± 0.5% vs. < 0.1% ± 0.0%; p = .004), although most remained asymptomatic. Procedural time, fluoroscopy time, and contrast volume were all comparable. GRADE certainty was low to moderate in most outcomes. CONCLUSION: The transradial approach was associated with a higher procedural failure rate. Total access site complications and minor bleeding were lower with the transradial approach, albeit with more frequent access vessel occlusion. Transradial access may be a feasible and safe approach; however, appropriate patient selection is imperative.

Transradial Angiography Skill Acquisition Using an Endovascular Simulation Program.

BACKGROUND: Given the benefits of neuroendovascular simulation to resident education, this study aimed to assess the efficacy of simulation-based training for neuroendovascular intervention with primary and secondary catheters using a transradial approach (TRA). METHODS: Five neurosurgical residents (PGY 1-3) from our institution enrolled in a standardized pilot training protocol. Trainees used the Mentice (Gothenburg, Vastra Gotaland, Sweden) Visit G5 simulator with a type II arch using a right TRA. RESULTS: All participants improved their total time to complete the task from the first trial to the last trial. Residents improved the overall time required to complete the task by 111.8 ± 57 seconds (52% improvement; P = 0.012). Participants reported improved knowledge of Simmons catheter formation from 1.6 ± 0.8 to 2.8 ± 1 (P = 0.035) and improved knowledge of transradial vessel selection technique from 1.6 ± 0.9 to 2.8 ± 1.1 (P = 0.035). All residents were able to illustrate a bovine arch and types 1-3 arches post-simulation. Residents rated the simulation usefulness as 4.6 ± 0.548 (scale 1 [not useful] to 5 [essential]) with 4 of the 5 residents (80%) identifying this exercise as essential. All residents rated the hands-on component of the training exercise as the most important. CONCLUSIONS: Residents demonstrated proficiency at Simmons catheter formation and vessel selection in a type II arch over a short time period (4 attempts and <1 hour total). Residents can use simulator-based training to increase their proficiency of vessel selection using a primary or secondary catheter for a TRA.

C-reactive protein to albumin ratio and radial artery thrombosis post transradial angiography.

Aim: The aim is to evaluate the relationship between C-reactive protein (CRP) to albumin ratio (CAR) and radial artery thrombosis in patients undergoing radial angiography. Patients & methods: We prospectively included 261 consecutive patients undergoing radial angiography, assessing radial artery diameter and thrombosis presence. Results: The CRP values were significantly higher in radial artery thrombosis group compared with group without thrombosis (13.01 vs. 4.33 mg/l, p < 0.001, respectively). Also CAR was statistically significantly different between the group with thrombosis and the group without thrombosis (0.102 vs. 0.349, p < 0.001). Conclusion: Our study is the first to assess CAR in radial thrombus development post-procedure in patients undergoing radial angiography. CAR can be useful in determining radial artery thrombosis after the coronary angiography.

[Box: see text].

Technical success and long-term experience of a novel radial guide-catheter shape: the JCLRAD.

Objectives: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) via the transradial route has been widely adopted over the transfemoral route, but guide catheter selection remains limited. We present our experience with a novel guide catheter design, the Judkin's Curve Left- Radial (JCLRAD, Medtronic), which is optimized for transradial PCI to the left coronary system. Methods: Sequential patients who underwent PCI using the JCLRAD catheter over a 3-year period (October 1, 2017 to November 1, 2020) were included in the analysis. Prospectively collected data were extracted from the institutional NCDR CathPCI registry with supplemental medical record review to collect clinical and procedural data. Results: PCI was performed in 2347 patients and 4070 lesions using the JCLRAD guide catheter. The mean age was 65.5 ± 11.7 years, and 72.1% of the population were male; 52.5% of patients presented with acute coronary syndrome. The lesion complexity was high (66.7% Class B2/C by ACCAHA classification) with a 7% use of atherectomy. Procedural success was 99.6% with no identified cases of iatrogenic catheter-induced coronary dissection. Conclusions: In this single-center retrospective study, the use of the JCLRAD was associated with a high success rate and low rates of complications, including no guide catheter-induced dissection in a cohort of patients with complex coronary anatomy. This is the first-reported large clinical experience with this novel radial left coronary system guide catheter.

Mediastinal hematoma after trans-radial cerebral angiography: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Trans-radial (TRA) access has become increasingly prevalent in neurointervention. Nonetheless, mediastinal hematoma after TRA is an infrequent yet grave complication associated with a notably elevated mortality rate. While our review found no reported mediastinal hematoma cases managed conservatively within neuro-interventional literature, similar complications are documented in cardiac and vascular interventional radiology, indicating its potential occurrence across disciplines. CASE PRESENTATION: Carotid computed tomography angiography (CTA) showed calcified plaques with stenosis (Left: Severe, Right: Moderate) in the bilateral internal carotid arteries (ICAs) of an 81-year-old male presented with paroxysmal weakness in the right upper limb. Dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel was administered. On day 7, DSA of the bilateral ICAs was performed via TRA. Post-DSA, the patient experienced transient loss of consciousness, chest tightness, and other symptoms without ECG or MRI abnormalities. Hemoglobin level decreased from 110 g/L to 92 g/L. Iodinated contrast-induced laryngeal edema was suspected, and the patient was treated with intravenous methylprednisolone. Neck CT indicated a possible mediastinal hemorrhage, which chest CTA confirmed. The patient's treatment plan involved discontinuing antiplatelet medication as a precautionary measure against the potential occurrence of an ischemic stroke instead of the utilization of a covered stent graft and surgical intervention. Serial CTs revealed hematoma absorption. Discharge CT showed a reduced hematoma volume of 35 × 45 mm. CONCLUSIONS: This case underscores the need for timely identification and precise manipulation of guidewires and guide-catheters through trans-radial access. The critical components of successful neuro-interventional techniques include timely examination, rapid identification, proper therapy, and diligent monitoring.

Effects of different puncture approaches on the curative effect and safety of patients with combined cardiovascular and cerebrovascular angiography.

Introduction: The relationship between different puncture points and perioperative complications and length of stay in hospital (LOS) in SCCAG patients has rarely been reported. Aim: To compare the curative effect and safety of the transradial artery approach and the transfemoral artery approach in combined heart-brain angiography. Material and methods: 120 patients who received combined cardio-cerebral angiography in our hospital were selected and divided into a transradial artery approach group (TRA) and a transfemoral artery approach group (TFA) according to a random number table. The postoperative efficacy and safety of the 2 groups were compared. Results: There was no statistically significant difference in puncture time and operation time between the 2 groups (p > 0.05). Postoperative bed rest time, hospitalization time, and X-ray exposure time in the TRA group were shorter than those in the TFA group, and the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05). Before operation and 3 days after operation, there was no significant difference in left ventricle ejection fraction between the 2 groups (p > 0. 05). The overall incidence of complications in the TFA group was higher than that in the TRA group. The incidence between haematoma and pseudoaneurysm in the TFA group was higher, and the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05). Conclusions: For simultaneous heart-brain angiography, interventional therapy via radial artery and femoral artery has good curative effect and can improve cardiac function. However, interventional therapy through the radial artery can shorten the postoperative bed rest time and hospitalization time, and reduce the incidence of complications.

Investigating optimal compression approach following radial artery puncture: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: The method for compressing hemorrhagic sites after transradial access has been a topic of interest, yet definitive guidelines remain elusive. This study aims to address this gap by optimizing the mechanical compression hemostasis protocol after transradial access. METHODS: This retrospective analysis included 300 patients from the Department of Cerebrovascular Diseases, Shanghai Fourth People's Hospital affiliated to Tongji University, who underwent transradial access for cerebrovascular angiography. Following the procedure, patients received radial artery compression hemostasis using a balloon compressor. They were divided into group A (n=100, continuous deflation) and group B (n=200, intermittent deflation) according to different hemostasis methods. The incidence of bleeding at the puncture site and complications were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The rate of bleeding at the puncture site was significantly lower in group B (20 out of 200 patients) compared to group A (20 out of 100 patients) (P=0.032). Similarly, the incidence of puncture site complications, such as edema, congestion, and wound infection was lower in group B (5 out of 200 patients) compared to group A (10 out of 100 patients) (P=0.006). CONCLUSION: Four hours of compression with intermittent deflation (group B) emerged as the optimal compression method after transradial access, demonstrating fewer complications at the patient's puncture site.

Results from a multicenter retrospective study of transradial iliac artery stenting in Japan.

Large-scale multicenter studies demonstrating the safety and effectiveness of transradial iliac artery stenting are lacking. We evaluated the data from a multicenter database in Japan. Transradial iliac artery stenting was performed on 115 lesions in 105 patients. The approach site was determined at the discretion of the operator. Patients with scheduled multiple sheath insertions for the bidirectional approach were excluded. Clinical data were retrospectively analyzed. The average age of this cohort was 71.1 ± 8.3 years. Eighty-six patients (81.9%) were male. Diabetes mellitus, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and smoking habit were present in 39 (37.1%), 84 (80.0%), 69 (65.7%), and 78 patients (74.3%), respectively. Rutherford classifications 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 comprised 40 (34.8%), 42 (36.5%), 28 (24.3%), 3 (2.6%), and 2 (1.7%) lesions, respectively, while Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus II classifications A, B, C, and D comprised 74 (64.3%), 21 (18.3%), 15 (13.0%), and 5 (4.3%), respectively. Twenty-seven lesions (23.5%) had chronic total occlusion. All lesions were successfully treated with 141 stents. Four patients (3.8%) required additional puncture of the common femoral artery for successful stent implantation. The ankle-brachial index significantly improved from 0.65 ± 0.17 to 0.95 ± 0.15 (P < 0.0001). None of the patients experienced any procedural or access site-related complications. Asymptomatic radial artery occlusion was observed in three cases (2.9%) after the procedure. There were no target lesion revascularizations or complications at 1 month. Compared to the traditional transfemoral approach, transradial iliac artery stenting is safe and feasible without any specific complications in carefully selected patients.

Effects of Transradial Access on In-Hospital Outcomes in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft: Insights from the Japanese Nationwide Database.

Because of its superior safety profile and improved outcomes, trans-radial percutaneous coronary intervention (TRI) has become the preferred access in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of native coronary disease. This study investigated the impact of TRI on in-hospital outcomes after PCI for coronary artery bypass graft vessels (GV-PCI). We analyzed patients who underwent GV-PCI in 2019-2022 from the Japanese nationwide registry. Patients were categorized into the TRI and trans-femoral PCI (TFI) groups. We assessed the association between TRI and in-hospital outcomes. The primary outcome was a composite of in-hospital death and major bleeding. In this study, 2,295 patients were analyzed.. The primary outcomes occurred in 29 patients (1.3%), including 17 deaths (0.7%). Major bleeding occurred in 12 patients (0.5%), and access site bleeding in 7 patients (0.3%). The TRI group (n = 1,521) showed lower crude rates of the primary outcome (0.9% vs 1.9%, p = 0.039), major bleeding (0.3% vs 1.0%, p = 0.027), and access site bleeding (0.1% vs 0.6%, p = 0.047) compared with the TFI group (n = 774). Univariable logistic regression demonstrated a significant association of TRI with reduced primary outcome (odd ratio [OR] 0.47, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.22 to 0.98), major bleeding (OR 0.25, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.80), and access site bleeding (OR 0.20, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.94). In the multivariable analysis, TRI was still significantly associated with a decrease in major bleeding events (OR 0.29, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.93). In conclusion, the use of TRI was associated with a reduction in bleeding events when referenced to TFI in the context of GV-PCI.