ABSTRACT
Caddisfly larvae commonly inhabit freshwater ecosystems, where they often create multi-species aggregations. However, while several strategies have been developed to avoid or reduce inter- and intraspecific interactions, most species choose the same time to seek a suitable place for pupation, which can increase competition. The current study assesses the competitive interactions among larvae (5th instar) of three co-existing Hydropsyche species, viz. H. contubernalis, H. pellucidula, and H. modesta, analysing their direct one-on-one interaction and various morphological features, such as size, weight, and mandibles. More than half of the interspecific conflicts ended with a draw, and 80% of intraspecific interactions with a decisive outcome. In fights between species, H. pellucidula was the most successful, and H. modesta the weakest. Our results confirm that among the larvae, competitive interactions were usually decided by body size, especially that of the head capsule. Although wider head capsule and higher weight were advantageous for ~60% of winning larvae, there were no distinct winning species. The chewing mouthpart turned out to be supportive in the fight: regardless of the species, longer and wider mandibles were significant for winning specimens, but not the distance between mandibles. Hence, acquiring a suitable place for pupation is determined by the possession of certain features enhancing the fighting potential of individual larvae, which does not exclude any species from the possibility of closing the life cycle. Future studies on interactions among caddisfly larvae could include experience in fights, volitional features and stridulation (not tested).