Effect of Topical Vancomycin on Surgical Site Infections in Ankle Fractures: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Trial.

Background Applying topical vancomycin has shown a decrease in the likelihood of surgical site infections (SSIs) in surgeries linked to a heightened risk of severe and resistant infections. Nevertheless, the effectiveness of this prophylactic approach has not been assessed in open ankle surgeries with internal fixation. Objective This study aimed to assess whether topical vancomycin diminishes the risk of SSI in patients with ankle fractures undergoing open reduction with internal fixation. Methods A randomized, controlled, double-blind clinical trial was carried out. Patients were divided into two groups in a 1:1 ratio. The control group received the standard prophylactic treatment with IV cephalothin 1 g, while the intervention group was administered topical vancomycin (1 g) in addition to the standard prophylactic treatment. The main outcomes were the SSI rates at 14 days, 28 days, and three months post-surgery, based on relevant clinical signs and laboratory tests. Results One hundred thirty-two patients were randomized (51.2% female), with 66 subjects included in each intervention arm. A total of 97.7% of them completed the study. Both groups were homogeneous in baseline characteristics. There were two SSIs in both the vancomycin group (3.3%) and the control group (3.5%), with no statistical differences (p = 0.945). The microorganisms isolated as causal agents were Staphylococcus aureus and Acinetobacter baumannii. By the three-month follow-up, no infections were noted in both intervention groups. Conclusion These results indicate that the topical administration of vancomycin may not represent an advantage in preventing SSI in ankle fractures requiring open reduction with internal fixation at the three-month postoperative stage.

Risk Factors for Surgical Site Infections and the Effects of Betadine Irrigation and Intrawound Vancomycin Powder on Infection Rates in Spine Tumor Surgery.

Background Surgical site infection (SSI) following spine tumor surgery results in delays in radiation therapy and the initiation of systemic treatment. The study aims to assess risk factors for SSI in malignancy-related spinal infections and rates of infection observed in a single center with the use of betadine irrigation (BI) and intrawound vancomycin powder (IVP).  Methods Spine tumor patients managed from 11/2012 to 11/2023 were identified using a surgical database (JotLogs, Efficient Surgical Apps, Portland, Maine). Inclusion criteria were patients receiving BI and IVP and alive at 30 days post-op. Exclusion criteria were patients not receiving a combination of BI and IVP due to allergies and mortality within 30 days of surgery. Patient demographics, histology, history of pre-operative and post-operative radiation treatment history, tumor location, procedure type, number of procedures per patient, SSI, wound culture results, and mortality were collected. Results One hundred two patients undergoing 130 procedures had an SSI rate of 3.85% (5/130). There were 18.6% primary and 81.4% metastatic tumors. Demographics were average age 59.5 years old (range 7-92), 60.8% male, 39.2% female, White 88.2%, Black 9.8%, and others 2%. Pre-operative radiation therapy was significantly associated with the risk of SSI (p=0.005). Percutaneous instrumentation did not lead to a significant difference in infection rates (p=0.139). There was no significant difference in infection rates between primary and metastatic tumors (p=0.58). Multivariable regression analysis revealed pre-operative radiation (OR: 18.1; 95%CI: 1.9-172.7; p=0.009) as the statistically significant independent risk factor. Conclusions Pre-operative radiation therapy remains a risk factor for SSI. However, percutaneous instrumentation did not lead to SSI, and there was no significant difference in infection rates between primary and metastatic tumors. SSI rate was 3.85% in patients who had a combination of BI and IVP in spine tumor surgery.

Intrawound Vancomycin Powder in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Prospective Quality Control Study.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this retrospective analysis of a prospective quality control project was to determine whether the use of intrawound vancomycin powder (IVP) decreases the rate of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) within 90 days following primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). METHODS: From October 2021 to September 2022, a prospective quality control project was undertaken in which 10 high-volume THA surgeons alternated between using and not using IVP each month while keeping other perioperative protocols unchanged. A retrospective analysis of the project was performed to compare the group of patients who received IVP to the group of patients who did not. The primary outcome was a culture positive infection within 90 days following primary THA. Secondary outcomes included gram-positive culture, overall reoperation rate, wound complications, readmission, and wound complications within 90 days post-operatively. A total of 1,193 primary THA patients were identified for analysis. There were 523 (43.8%) patients who received IVP and were included in the IVP group, while 670 (56.2%) did not and were included in the non-IVP group. Age, body mass index, and sex were similar between the 2 groups (P > .25). RESULTS: The IVP group had a higher rate of culture positive joint infections (1.7 [0.8, 3.2] versus 0.3% [0.04, 1.1], P = .01) than the non-IVP group. All PJI's were found to have gram positive bacteria in both groups. The IVP group had a higher overall reoperation rate than the non-IVP group (6.1 [4.2, 8.5] versus 2.4% [1.4, 3.9], P < .01). The IVP group had a higher reoperation rate for any wound complication compared to non-IVP patients (2.7 [1.5, 4.5] versus 0.7% [0.2, 1.7], P < .01). The overall readmission rate (6.1 [4.2, 8.5] versus 2.8% [1.7, 4.4], P < .01), as well as readmission for suspected infection (2.1 [1.1, 3.7] versus 0.6% [0.02, 1.5], P = .03), were higher in the IVP group. CONCLUSIONS: The use of IVP in primary THA was associated with a higher rate of PJI, overall reoperation, reoperation for wound complications, and readmission in a prospective quality control project. Until future prospective randomized studies determine the safety and efficacy of IVP in THA conclusively, we advocate against its utilization.

[Translated article] Vancomycin powder in the prevention of infection in primary knee and hip arthroplasty: Case-control study with 1151 arthroplasties.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Vancomycin powder (VP) has been positively used in spinal surgery to reduce the rate of infections. Hardly any data have been published on hip and knee joint replacement surgery, and its usefulness is questioned. Our objective was to investigate the effectiveness of VP in reducing prosthetic infection and its possible complications. METHODS: Primary hip (THA) and knee (TKA) arthroplasties were reviewed, performed by five surgeons in one hospital centre, between 2017 and 2018. One gram of VP was used on the implant prior to surgical closure based on the surgeon's preferences. With a 5-year follow-up in which the infection rate and local complications were analysed. RESULTS: One thousand one hundred and fifty-one arthroplasties were performed, 748 were TKA and 403 were THA. Nine patients were diagnosed with prosthetic infection, of which five received VP and four did not (p=0.555). Likewise, another 15 patients suffered wound complications, of which 11 received VP and 4 did not (p=0.412). There were no differences, either, in the rest of the complications depending on the use or not of VP (p=0.101). Likewise, the number of patients who needed reintervention was similar (p=0.999). No systemic complications were detected due to the use of VP. CONCLUSIONS: It has not been possible to demonstrate that the use of VP reduces the rates of prosthetic infection in the hip and knee, so we cannot recommend its use.

The Effect of Topical Vancomycin Powder Application on the Rate of Intervertebral Fusion Following Lumbar Fusion: A Retrospective Study.

PURPOSE: The occurrence of surgical site infection (SSI) after lumbar spinal fusion is a serious complication. Therefore, an increasing number of clinicians are applying vancomycin powder topically in the surgical field to reduce the incidence of SSI. However, there is concern that topical vancomycin powder application may affect intervertebral fusion. The purpose of this study was to analyse the effect of clinically relevant topical vancomycin doses on the rate of intervertebral fusion after lumbar fusion and to further investigate the effect of vancomycin powder on the prevention of SSI. METHODS: The clinical data of 192 patients with degenerative lumbar spine disease admitted from January 2019 to June 2022, all of whom underwent posterior lumbar fusion, were retrospectively analysed. According to the infection prevention protocol, they were divided into a vancomycin group and a control group (no vancomycin), and the vancomycin group was sub-divided into 0.5 g, 1.0 g, and 1.5 g vancomycin groups. General information and surgical evaluation indexes were compared between the control and vancomycin groups and intervertebral fusion was compared between the vancomycin groups at 6 months and 12 months, postoperatively. RESULTS: The rate of SSI in the vancomycin group was 0.0%, which was significantly lower than that in the control group (5.3%, P < 0.05), and intervertebral fusion was good in all 3 vancomycin groups at 6 months and 12 months postoperatively, with no statistically-significant differences (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Topical application of 0.5 g, 1.0 g, or 1.5 g vancomycin powder did not affect the rates of intervertebral fusion after lumbar fusion. In addition, topical application of vancomycin powder significantly reduced the rates of SSI.

Effectiveness of vancomycin powder for preventing postoperative spinal infection.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of Vancomycin Power (VP) and the occurrence of resistant organisms after four-year of routine VP use. METHODS: The study included 1063 patients who underwent posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) between January 2010 and February 2020. Intrawound VP was applied to all instrumented fusions starting in January 2016. The patients were divided into two groups: those who did not apply VP (non-VP) (n = 605) between 2010 and 2015, and those who did apply VP (VP) (n = 458) between 2016 and 2020. The baseline characteristics, clinical symptoms, infection rate, and causative organisms were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The rate of PSI was not significantly different between the non-VP group (1.32 %, n = 8) and the VP group (1.09 %, n = 5). Although adjusted by diabetes mellitus, VP still did not show statistical significance (OR = 0.757 (0.245-2.345), p = 0.630). There were no critical complications that were supposed to relation with vancomycin powder. In the 13 cases of PSI, seven pathogens were isolated, with a gram-negative organism identified in the non-VP group. However, the type of organism was not significantly different between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The use of intrawound VP may not affect the PSI and occurrence of resistant organism and may not cause critical complications. Therefore, clinicians may decide whether to use VP for preventing PSI not worrying about its safety.

Efficacy of prophylactic use of intraoperative vancomycin powder in preventing surgical site infection in neurological surgeries in Irrua, Nigeria: A randomized controlled study.

PURPOSE: The objective was to determine the efficacy of intraoperative vancomycin powder in preventing SSIs in neurological surgeries. METHODS: A prospective randomized controlled study of patients who had clean cranial and non-implant spine surgeries at the Irrua Specialist Teaching Hospital, Irrua, Nigeria from February 1, 2021 to January 31, 2022. Patients were randomized into two groups. Group A patients had prophylactic intraoperative vancomycin powder applied to the surgical bed before wound closure while group B patients did not. Patients in both groups were followed up for 30 days post-operatively for evidence of SSI. The occurrence of SSIs was determined using clinical and laboratory parameters. Baseline characteristics, operative details, rates of wound infection, and microbiological data for each case were recorded. Data was analyzed using Statistical Package for Scientific Solution (SPSS) version 23 software. RESULTS: Forty-two patients were randomized into 2 groups of 21 patients each. The age range of the patients was 20 to 80 years. The majority of the patients were males (32 out of 42). The mean age of patients in group A was 48.05 ± 17.03 years, while group B had a mean age of 45.95 ± 19.14 years. The mean Body Mass Index of patients in groups A and B were 23.92 ± 5.21 and 23.21 ± 3.99 respectively. Seven out of 21 patients (33.3 %) in the control group ( group B) had superficial SSIs while no patient in the experimental group had SSI, p-value < 0.05. The organisms cultured were Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Staphylococcus aureus. CONCLUSION: Intraoperative vancomycin powder was effective in reducing the rate of SSIs following neurological surgeries and without adverse drug reactions.

Vancomycin powder in the prevention of infection in primary knee and hip arthroplasty: Case-control study with 1151 arthroplasties. / Vancomicina en polvo en la prevención de la infección en artroplastia primaria de rodilla y cadera: estudio de casos y controles con 1.151 artroplastias.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Vancomycin powder (VP) has been positively used in spinal surgery to reduce the rate of infections. Hardly any data have been published on hip and knee joint replacement surgery, and its usefulness is questioned. Our objective was to investigate the effectiveness of VP in reducing prosthetic infection and its possible complications. METHODS: Primary hip (THA) and knee (TKA) arthroplasties were reviewed, performed by five surgeons in one hospital center, between 2017 and 2018. 1g of VP was used on the implant prior to surgical closure based on the surgeon's preferences. With a 5-year follow-up in which the infection rate and local complications were analyzed. RESULTS: One thousand one hundred and fifty one arthroplasties were performed, 748 were TKA and 403 were THA. Nine patients were diagnosed with prosthetic infection, of which five received VP and four did not (P=.555). Likewise, another 15 patients suffered wound complications, of which 11 received VP and 4 did not (P=.412). There were no differences, either, in the rest of the complications depending on the use or not of VP (P=.101). Likewise, the number of patients who needed reintervention was similar (P=.999). No systemic complications were detected due to the use of VP. CONCLUSIONS: It has not been possible to demonstrate that the use of VP reduces the rates of prosthetic infection in the hip and knee, so we cannot recommend its use.

Use of topical vancomycin powder in total joint arthroplasty: Why the current literature is inconsistent?

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a rare but terrible complication in hip and knee arthroplasty, and the use of topical vancomycin powder (VP) has been investigated as a tool to potentially reduce its incidence. However, there remains no consensus on its efficacy. Therefore, the aim of this review is to provide an overview on the application of topical vancomycin in orthopaedic surgery focusing on the recent evidence and results in total joint arthroplasty. Several systematic reviews and meta-analyses on topical VP in hip and knee arthroplasty have been recently published reporting sometimes conflicting results. Apart from all being limited by the quality of the included studies (mostly level III and IV), confounding variables are often included potentially leading to biased conclusions. If taken into consideration the exclusive use of VP in isolation, the available data, although very limited, suggest that it does not reduce the infection rate in routine primary hip and knee arthroplasty. Therefore, we still cannot advise for a routinary application. A properly powered randomized-controlled trial would be necessary to clarify the role of VP in hip and knee arthroplasty. Based on the analysis of the current evidence, the use of topical VP appears to be safe when used locally in terms of systemic adverse reactions, hence, if proven to be effective, it could bring great benefits due to its low cost and accessibility.

Vancomycin Powder Is Highly Cost-Effective in Total Ankle Arthroplasty.

Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a costly and potentially fatal complication in total ankle arthroplasty (TAA). Some surgeons apply topical vancomycin powder to minimize the risk of infection during TAA procedures. The purpose of our study was to determine the cost-effectiveness of using vancomycin powder to prevent PJI following TAA and to propose an economic model that can be applied by foot and ankle surgeons in their decision to incorporate vancomycin powder in practice. Using our institution's records of the cost of 1 g of topical vancomycin powder, we performed a break-even analysis and calculated the absolute risk reduction and number needed to treat for varying costs of vancomycin powder, PJI infection rates, and costs of TAA revision. Costing $3.06 per gram at our institution, vancomycin powder was determined to be cost-effective in TAA if the PJI rate of 3% decreased by an absolute risk reduction of 0.02% (Number Needed to Treat = 5304). Furthermore, our results indicate that vancomycin powder can be highly cost-effective across a wide range of costs, PJI infection rates, and varying costs of TAA revision. The use of vancomycin powder remained cost-effective even when (1) the price of vancomycin powder was as low as $2.50 to as high as $100.00, (2) infection rates ranged from .05 to 3%, and (3) the cost of the TAA revision procedure ranged from $1000 to $10 000.Levels of Evidence: IV.

Intrawound vancomycin powder in orthopaedic surgery as surgical site wound infection prophylaxis: A meta-analysis.

A meta-analysis research was executed to appraise the consequence of intrawound vancomycin powder (IWVP) in orthopaedic surgery (OPS) as surgical site wound infection (SSWI) prophylaxis. Inclusive literature research till March 2023 was carried out and 2756 interconnected researches were revised. Of the 18 picked researches enclosed 13 214 persons with OPS were in the used researches' starting point, 5798 of them were utilising IWVP, and 7416 were control. Odds ratio (OR) in addition to 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to appraise the consequence of the IWVP in OPS as SSWI prophylaxis by the dichotomous approaches and a fixed or random model. IWVP had significantly lower SSWIs (OR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.50-0.74, P < .001), deep SSWIs (OR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.36-0.91, P = .02), and superficial SSWIs (OR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.46-0.98, P = .04) compared with control in persons with OPS. IWVP had significantly lower SSWIs, deep SSWIs, and superficial SSWIs compared with control in persons with OPS. However, when interacting with its values, caution must be taken and more research is needed to confirm this finding.

Intra-wound versus systemic vancomycin for preventing surgical site infection induced by methicillin-resistant S. aureus after spinal implant surgery in a rat model.

BACKGROUND: Systemic vancomycin administration pre-operatively for the infection prophylaxis of spinal implant surgery remains unsatisfactory. This study aimed to explore the efficacy and dosage of local use of vancomycin powder (VP) in preventing surgical site infections after spinal implant surgery in a rat model. METHODS: Systemic vancomycin (SV; intraperitoneal injection, 88 mg/kg) or intraoperative intra-wound VP (VP0.5: 44 mg/kg, VP1.0: 88 mg/kg, VP2.0: 176 mg/kg) was applied after spinal implant surgery and methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA; ATCC BAA-1026) inoculation in rats. General status, blood inflammatory biomarkers, microbiological and histopathological evaluation were performed during 2 weeks post-surgery. RESULTS: No post-surgical deaths, wound complications and obvious signs of vancomycin adverse effects were observed. Bacterial counts, blood and tissue inflammation were reduced in the VP groups compared with the SV group. VP2.0 group showed better outcomes in weight gain and tissue inflammation than the VP0.5 and VP1.0 group. Microbial counts indicated that no bacteria survived in the VP2.0 group, whereas MRSA was detected in VP0.5 and VP1.0 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Intra-wound VP may be more effective than systemic administration in preventing infection caused by MRSA (ATCC BAA-1026) after spinal implant surgery in a rat model.

Vancomycin powder embedded in collagen sponge decreases the rate of prosthetic shoulder infection.

BACKGROUND: Shoulder arthroplasty is a successful procedure to treat degenerative and traumatic diseases of the glenohumeral joint. Periprosthetic infection represents an infrequent but dreaded complication (2%-4%). Application of intrawound vancomycin powder seems to reduce periprosthetic infections, but limited information is available on its efficiency in shoulder arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to evaluate if the vancomycin powder embedded in a collagen sponge could decrease the rate of prosthetic shoulder infection. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 827 patients undergoing total shoulder arthroplasty was performed. The study involved a control group of 405 patients and a group of 422 with the intraoperative insertion of intrawound vancomycin powder. Incidence of periprosthetic infection was evaluated comparing the 2 groups at a minimum follow-up of 12 months. Patient demographics, comorbidities, and perioperative information were compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS: No infection was observed in the group treated with intrawound vancomycin, and 13 cases of infection were observed in the control group (3.2%) (P value <.001) without subacromial vancomycin application. No wound complications requiring revision were observed as a result of intrawound vancomycin application. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Intrawound vancomycin powder significantly reduces the rate of periprosthetic shoulder infections without any increase in local and systemic aseptic complications at a minimum follow-up of 12 months. Our results support the use of intrawound local vancomycin for prophylaxis of shoulder periprosthetic infections.

Local administration of vancomycin powder in orthopaedic fracture surgery: current practice and trends.

Objectives: Surgical site infections in orthopaedic trauma are a significant problem with meaningful patient and health care system-level consequences. Direct application of antibiotics to the surgical field has many potential benefits in reducing surgical site infections. However, to date, the data regarding the local administration of antibiotics have been mixed. This study reports on the variability of prophylactic vancomycin powder use in orthopaedic trauma cases across 28 centers. Methods: Intrawound topical antibiotic powder use was prospectively collected within three multicenter fracture fixation trials. Fracture location, Gustilo classification, recruiting center, and surgeon information were collected. Differences in practice patterns across recruiting center and injury characteristics were tested using chi-square statistic and logistic regression. Additional stratified analyses by recruiting center and individual surgeon were performed. Results: A total of 4941 fractures were treated, and vancomycin powder was used in 1547 patients (31%) overall. Local administration of vancomycin powder was more frequent in open fractures 38.8% (738/1901) compared with closed fractures 26.6% (809/3040) (P < 0.001). However, the severity of the open fracture type did not affect the rate at which vancomycin powder was used (P = 0.11). Vancomycin powder use varied substantially across the clinical sites (P < 0.001). At the surgeon level, 75.0% used vancomycin powder in less than one-quarter of their cases. Conclusions: Prophylactic intrawound vancomycin powder remains controversial with varied support throughout the literature. This study demonstrates wide variability in its use across institutions, fracture types, and surgeons. This study highlights the opportunity for increased practice standardization for infection prophylaxis interventions. Level of Evidence: Prognostic-III.

Is Topical Vancomycin an Option? A Randomized Controlled Trial to Determine the Safety of the Topical Use of Vancomycin Powder in Preventing Postoperative Infections in Total Knee Arthroplasty, as Compared With Standard Postoperative Antibiotics.

BACKGROUND: The demand for total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) is expected to rise in the coming decades, increasing the burden of periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs). The use of intrawound vancomycin powder (VP) has proven to be effective in reducing the incidence of PJIs after spinal surgery. That said, its effectiveness in TKA remains unclear. This trial aims to examine the efficacy of intrawound vancomycin powder first versus standard postoperative antibiotics in preventing PJIs after TKA. METHODS: This study was a double-blinded, noninferiority, randomized controlled trial. All participants received standard preoperative intravenous (IV) antibiotics (Cefazolin/Vancomycin) within 60 minutes of skin incision. Patients in the treatment group received 1 gram of VP applied intraoperatively by the orthopedic surgeon (500 mg directly on the prosthesis, 500 mg above the closed joint capsule). These patients did not receive postoperative antibiotics. Patients in the control group received standard postoperative IV antibiotics. The primary outcome was the incidence of acute surgical site infection within 42 days of procedure. RESULTS: There were 80 patients randomized to the treatment group and 85 patients randomized to the control. Groups were matched with respect to baseline characteristics, including average age (66 versus 64), BMI (35.7 versus 33.4), and diabetics (16 versus 13). The trial was halted at 1 year as a significantly greater proportion (P = .03) of patients in the treatment group (n = 3, 3.75%) were diagnosed with PJIs compared to the control (n = 0). CONCLUSION: Our trial demonstrated the intrawound application of VP to be inferior to standard postoperative IV antibiotics in reducing the incidence of PJIs after TKA.

Intrawound application of vancomycin reduces the proportion of fracture-related infections in high-risk tibial plateau fractures.

INTRODUCTION: Despite the improvements in surgical techniques and the use of prophylactic intravenous antibiotics, the fracture-related infection (FRI) incidence after high-risk tibial plateau fractures remains high. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical effect of the intrawound application of vancomycin on the FRI after high-risk tibial plateau fracture surgery. METHODS: A total of 243 patients who underwent high-risk tibial plateau fracture surgery from May 2013 to June 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Of these, 233 cases were enrolled. Considering the preoperative patient condition, surgeons applied vancomycin powder directly into the surgical site before wound closure in 105 cases (intrawound application of vancomycin powder with preoperative intravenous cephalosporin). The remaining 128 cases served as the control group (preoperative intravenous cephalosporin alone). Clinical data and surgical details were recorded. The Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was used to assess risk factors for FRI. The Kaplan-Meier method and the log rank test illustrated the infection status of patients based on the application of intrawound vancomycin. The primary outcome was an FRI within one year. Secondary outcomes included bacterial culture and vancomycin-related complications. RESULTS: Our study demonstrated a significant difference in the incidence of FRI between the vancomycin group and the control group (3.8% versus 10.9%; p=0.041). Multivariable Cox regression showed the intrawound application of vancomycin powder decreased the rate of FRI. There were no complications related to intrawound vancomycin observed during follow-up. The presence of Gram-positive FRI was higher in the control group compared with the vancomycin group. CONCLUSIONS: Intrawound application of vancomycin was associated with a significant lower rate of FRI after high-risk tibial plateau fracture surgery compared to the control group.

Do superficial infections increase the risk of deep infections in tibial plateau and plafond fractures?

PURPOSE: Open reduction internal fixation of tibial plateau and pilon fractures may be complicated by deep surgical site infection requiring operative debridement and antibiotic therapy. The management of superficial surgical site infection is controversial. We sought to determine whether superficial infection is associated with an increased risk of deep infection requiring surgical debridement after fixation of tibial plateau and pilon fractures. METHODS: This is a secondary analysis of data from the VANCO trial, which included 980 adult patients with a tibial plateau or pilon fracture at elevated risk of infection who underwent open reduction internal fixation with plates and screws with or without intrawound vancomycin powder. An association of superficial surgical site infection with deep surgical site infection requiring debridement surgery and antibiotics was explored after matching on risk factors for deep surgical site infection. RESULTS: Of the 980 patients, we observed 30 superficial infections (3.1%) and 76 deep infections (7.8%). Among patients who developed a superficial infection, the unadjusted incidence of developing a deep infection within 90 days was 12.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.3-24.2%). However, after a 3:1 match on infection risk factors, the 90-day marginal probability of a deep surgical site infection after sustaining a superficial infection was 6.0% (95% CI - 6.5-18.5%, p = 0.35). CONCLUSION: Deep infection after superficial infection is uncommon following operative fixation of tibial plateau and pilon fractures. Increased risk of subsequent deep infection attributable to superficial infection was inconclusive in these data. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level II.

A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing intrawound vancomycin powder and povidone iodine lavage in the prevention of periprosthetic joint infection of hip and knee arthroplasties.

BACKGROUND: Focus on reviewing a vigorous research effort to improve the safety profile of vancomycin powder (VP) and its optimal dose in reducing periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is the need of the hour. This systematic review and meta-analysis attempt to explore the ongoing use of VP and VP + povidone iodine (PI) lavage to prevent PJI of hip/knee arthroplasties and highlights its challenges among the orthopedic community about the existence of the major organism and its frequency in total joint arthroplasty (TJA) patients. METHODS: We searched PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE databases regarding the outcomes of vancomycin powder (VP) and VP + povidone iodine (PI) combination in preventing periprosthetic joint infection of hip and knee arthroplasties. RESULTS: In 5 of 7 studies, the combination of vancomycin powder (VP) and povidone iodine (PI) lavage have shown a lower risk of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in acute and high-risk hip and knee arthroplasties patients, with less or without serious adverse events and readmissions; while four of seven studies using VP-only found increasing rates of PJI in primary total knee arthroplasty and partial hip replacement in elderly patients with comorbidities, and significantly causes aseptic wound complications compared to the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Intra-articular vancomycin powder (VP) and povidone iodine (PI) lavage showed a significant reduction of periprosthetic joint infection in primary and revision total joint arthroplasty. Before its widespread use in clinical settings, prospective randomized studies and, most importantly, its long-term efficacy and safety are recommended.

Is Vancomycin More Effective than Taurolidine? Comparative Analysis of Their Preventive Effect against Spinal Infection in 1000 Patients with Spinal Fusion.

This study aimed to examine the effect of taurolidine irrigation on preventing surgical site infection by comparing the spinal infection rate after spinal fusion surgery using vancomycin powder application and taurolidine irrigation. Of 1081 participants, 369 underwent taurolidine irrigation, 221 underwent vancomycin powder application, and 491 were controls. Of the 20 surgical site infections (1.85%), 14 occurred in the control group (2.85%), 5 in the vancomycin group (2.26%), and 1 (0.27%) in the taurolidine group. Among the various variables, age at the time of surgery, smoking, surgical site, and hemovac removal time were significant in the univariate logistic regression. The final result was derived after variable selection using the stepwise method. In the univariate model, the odds ratios were 0.09 and 0.79 in each of the vancomycin and taurolidine groups compared to that of the control group. In the multivariate model, the odds ratios were 0.09 and 0.83 in each of the vancomycin and taurolidine groups compared to that of the control group. The preventive effect of vancomycin powder application was not statistically significant. However, the vancomycin group showed a less effective tendency than the taurolidine group. Taurolidine irrigation may be a good substitute for the vancomycin powder application.