Differential Prognostic Impact of Clinical Congestion between Preserved versus Reduced Ejection Fraction in Patients Hospitalized for Acute Decompensated Heart Failure: Findings from the Japanese KCHF registry.

BACKGROUNDS: Most patients hospitalized for heart failure (HF) present with signs of congestion. Prognostic significance of clinical congestion may vary depending on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). This study aims to investigate the prognostic impact of congestion across different LVEF categories. METHODS AND RESULTS: Composite congestion scores (CCS) (0-9) derived from the severity of edema, jugular venous pressure, and orthopnea, were analyzed on admission and at discharge in 3787 patients hospitalized for HF (LVEF≥40%: n=2347, LVEF<40%: n=1440). The median admission CCS was 4 in both LVEF strata (P=0.64). Adjusted HRs (95%CI) of the moderate [CCS 4-6] and severe congestion [7-9] groups relative to the mild congestion [0-3] group on admission for a composite of all-cause death or HF re-hospitalization were 1.20 (1.04-1.39, P=0.01) and 1.54 (1.27-1.86, P<0.001) in the LVEF≥40% stratum, and 1.20 (1.01-1.44, P=0.04) and 0.82 (0.61-1.07, P=0.14) in the LVEF<40% stratum, respectively (Pinteraction<0.001). 16% of the patients with LVEF ≥40% and 14% with LVEF <40% had residual congestion (CCS ≥1) at discharge, which was associated with respective adjusted HR of 1.40 (1.18-1.65, P <0.001) and 1.25 (0.98-1.58, P=0.07) for post-discharge death or HF re-hospitalization (Pinteraction=0.63). CONCLUSION: The severity of clinical congestion on admission was associated with adverse clinical outcomes in patients with LVEF ≥40%, but no in those with LVEF <40%. These findings warrant further studies to better understand the detailed profile of congestion across the LVEF spectrum.

Left bundle branch area pacing: A new era of cardiac resynchronization therapy?

The recent systematic review and meta-analysis provided a comprehensive focus on the current state of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). The authors determined the feasibility of physiological left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) in patients indicated for CRT through a careful analysis of trials. They found that LBBAP was associated with significant reductions in QRS duration, New York Heart Association functional class, B-type natriuretic peptide levels, and pacing thresholds as well as improvements in echocardiographic parameters compared to biventricular pacing.

Two-year clinical outcome of patients with mildly reduced ejection fraction after acute myocardial infarction: insights from the prospective KAMIR-NIH Registry.

Background: Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is a crucial prognostic indicator of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). However, there is a lack of studies on the clinical characteristics and prognosis of patients with mildly reduced ejection fraction (EF) after AMI. Methods: We categorized 6,553 patients with AMI from the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry-National Institutes of Health (KAMIR-NIH) between November 2011 and December 2015 into three groups based on their EF, as assessed by echocardiography during index hospitalization: reduced EF (LVEF ≤40%), mildly reduced EF (LVEF 41%-49%), and preserved EF (LVEF ≥50%). The primary outcome was all-cause death within 2 years. The secondary outcomes included myocardial infarction (MI), revascularization, and patient-oriented composite endpoint (POCE), which was defined as a composite of all-cause death, any MI, or revascularization. Results: Of the total 6,553 patients, 884 (13.5%) were classified into the reduced EF group, 1,749 (26.7%) into the mildly reduced EF group, and 3,920 (59.8%) into the preserved EF group. Patients with mildly reduced EF exhibited intermediate mortality (reduced EF, 24.7%; mildly reduced EF, 8.3%; preserved EF, 4.6%; p < 0.0001), MI (3.9% vs. 2.7% vs. 2.6%; p < 0.0046), and POCE (33.0% vs. 15.6% vs. 12.4%; p < 0.0001) rates, albeit closer to those of the preserved EF. After adjustment for demographics, risk factors, admission status, and discharge medications, patients with mildly reduced EF showed a lower risk of all-cause death than those with reduced EF (mildly reduced EF group as a reference: HR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.40-2.18; p < 0.001), but it did not differ significantly from those with preserved EF (HR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.75-1.18; p = 0.999). Conclusions: Over a 2-year follow-up period, patients with AMI and mildly reduced EF demonstrated better prognoses than those with reduced EF, but did not differ significantly from those with preserved EF. Clinical Trial Registration: cris.nih.go.kr, identifier: KCT-0000863.

The Impact of Sacubitril/Valsartan on Heart Failure Patient with Reduced Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction: Single Center Retrospective Study in Saudi Arabia.

Background: Sacubitril/valsartan (S/V) is used in managing heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), reducing morbidity and mortality while improving symptoms and prognosis. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of S/V in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and its safety. Methods:  This retrospective cohort study included adult patients aged ≥18 years diagnosed with HFrEF, receiving S/V, and followed up at a tertiary hospital in Riyadh. Primary outcomes included improvements in LVEF on echocardiography and the number of hospitalizations due to acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF). Secondary outcomes assessed the safety profile of S/V. Multinomial logistic regression analysis was performed with statistical significance set at P < 0.05. . Results: The study included 107 patients: 80 with LVEF < 30% and 27 with LVEF 30-40%. Six-month follow-up, LVEF improvement was categorized into three groups: no improvement, LVEF increased by 1 to <10 points, and LVEF increased by ≥10 points. The LVEF was similar across groups (P = 0.59). Although hospitalizations due to ADHF were not significantly different between groups, they numerically decreased after initiating S/V (P = 0.1). S/V was generally well tolerated. Conclusion: This study suggests no significant benefit from S/V regarding LVEF improvement. It is recommended that heart failure clinics assess and titrate S/V to the maximum tolerated dose.

Potentially Risk Factors for New Atrial Fibrillation in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Objective: Our study evaluated the risk factors for new postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) by analyzing the data collected from patients who underwent first coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Methods: Our study retrospectively collected data from January 2021 to December 2023 at Changzhi People's Hospital. The perioperative period data were collected, and logistic regression was used to analyze the independent predictors of the occurrence of POAF after CABG and the related predictive values of risk factors were analyzed by using the subjects' work characteristic curve (ROC). Results: A total of 169 patients were included, and there are 45 patients in the POAF group, with an incidence of 26.6%, and 124 in the non-POAF group. The POAF group was significantly higher than the non-POAF group in terms of age (69.2±8.8 years vs 62.3±9.3 years) and preoperative LAD (42.7±7.2mm vs 36.8±5.5mm), and the difference was significant (P<0.05). Preoperative HDL-C in the POAF group were lower than non-POAF group (1.0±0.5 mmol/l vs 1.4±0.7 mmol/l, P<0.05). The logistic regression analysis revealed a significant correlation between age, LAD, HDL-C and the occurrence of POAF (P<0.05). According to the ROC curve analysis, age >64.5 years, LAD >41mm, and HDL-C <0.9 mmol/l were the cut-off values for predicting the occurrence of POAF (AUC1=0.733; AUC2=0.741; AUC3=0.647, P < 0.05). The combined age + LAD + HDL-C (AUC = 0.755; P < 0.05) had a higher diagnostic value and high sensitivity. Conclusion: The age, LAD, and HDL-C are independent risk factors for the POAF after CABG, and clinicians should assess these risk factors as much as possible when managing patients in the perioperative period and make corresponding measures to prevent the development of POAF.

Prediction of left ventricular thrombus after myocardial infarction: a cardiac magnetic resonance-based prospective registry.

BACKGROUND: Left ventricular thrombus (LVTh) is a severe complication after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). OBJECTIVES: We aim to predict LVTh occurrence by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) using clinical, echocardiographic, and electrocardiographic (ECG) variables readily available at admission. METHODS: We included 590 reperfused STEMI patients who underwent early (1-week) and/or late (6-month) CMR in our institution. Baseline clinical, echocardiographic (left ventricular ejection fraction -LVEF-) and ECG data (summatory of ST-segment elevation -sum-STE- and Q-wave and residual ST-elevation >1 mm -Q-STE-) during admission were registered. Multivariate binary logistic regression models and receiver operating characteristic curves were computed for LVTh prediction. RESULTS: LVTh was detected by CMR in 43 (7.3 %) patients and was predicted by previous chronic coronary syndrome (CCS, HR 4.74 [1.82-12.35], p = 0.001), anterior STEMI (HR 10.93 [2.47-48.31], p = 0.002), LVEF (HR 0.96 [0.93-0.99] per %, p = 0.008), maximum sum-STE (HR 1.04 [1.01-1.07] per mm, p = 0.04), and Q-STE (HR 1.31 [1.08-1.6] per lead, p = 0.008). High-risk patients with both major (anterior STEMI and Q-STE in ≥1 leads) and 1-3 minor (CCS, maximum sum-STE >10 mm, LVEF <50%) factors showed the highest LVTh risk (19.6 % within 6 months). The model showed excellent discrimination ability (area under the curve=0.85 [0.81-0.9], p < 0.001). Simplified 4-variable (excluding sum-STE) and 3-variable (also excluding CCS) risk scores showed similar discrimination ability and were externally validated. CONCLUSIONS: LVTh within 6 months post-STEMI can be predicted using pre-discharge clinical (anterior infarction and CCS), echocardiographic (LVEF), and ECG (sum-STE and Q-STE) data. Our results can help select patients who should undergo CMR after STEMI for LVTh detection.

The role of E-wave velocity in predicting early left ventricular dysfunction and significant decline in left ventricular ejection fraction after mitral valve repair for severe chronic primary mitral regurgitation.

Preoperative left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (LVEF) and LV end-systolic dimension (LVESD) are established predictors of LV dysfunction (LVD) after mitral valve repair (MVr) for mitral regurgitation (MR). Although elevated estimated right ventricular systolic pressure (eRVSP) indicating pulmonary hypertension is the best proposed additional predictor, we hypothesized that transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) parameters more directly reflecting left atrial pressure (LAP) would more accurately predict LVD than eRVSP. Furthermore, predictors of a significant decline in LVEF remain unknown. We retrospectively studied 622 patients, aged 20-87 years, who underwent MVr for severe chronic primary MR. As previously reported predictors of postoperative LVD, we collected seven preoperative TTE parameters, including LVESD, LVEF, eRVSP, LV end-diastolic dimension, left atrial volume index (LAVI), early transmitral annular (e') velocity, and atrial fibrillation. Furthermore, as LAP-related TTE parameters, we collected left atrial dimension, E-wave velocity, and E/e' ratio, in addition to eRVSP and LAVI. Using multivariate logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic curve analyses, we explored predictors of early postoperative LVD, defined as LVEF < 50% measured on postoperative day 7. We further explored predictors of a significant decline in LVEF, defined as an absolute decline in LVEF of > 12 percentage points, the third quintile of the data. Incidences of postoperative LVD and a significant LVEF decline were 12.9% and 23.2%, respectively. In addition to LVESD and LVEF, E-wave velocity, but not eRVSP, remained a significant predictor of postoperative LVD. E-wave velocity, LVESD, and LVEF had additive effects in risk prediction. Furthermore, E-wave velocity was the strongest predictor of a significant LVEF decline. E-wave velocities > 121.5 cm/s and > 101.5 cm/s were associated with increased risks of postoperative LVD (odds ratio [OR], 2.896; 95% confidence interval [95%CI], 1.792-4.681; p < 0.001) and a significant LVEF decline (OR, 6.345; 95%CI, 3.707-10.86; p < 0.001), respectively. After adjustment for multiple TTE parameters, E-wave velocity, but not eRVSP, remained significant predictors of postoperative LVD and a significant LVEF decline after MVr. These results were reproducible in 461 patients who underwent follow-up TTE at 1 year, suggesting an important role of E-wave velocity in risk prediction.

Predictors of trastuzumab-induced cardiotoxicity among racially and ethnically diverse patients with HER2-positive breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: While trastuzumab has been shown to improve disease-free and overall survival in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer, it may also cause trastuzumab-induced cardiotoxicity (TIC). Although racial and ethnic minorities are at higher risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD) compared to non-Hispanic Whites (NHW), limited data exists on TIC incidence in diverse multi-ethnic populations. Our objective was to assess racial and ethnic differences in TIC and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) recovery among patients with HER2-positive breast cancer. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study including patients diagnosed with stage I-III HER2-positive breast cancer between 2007 and 2022 who had received adjuvant trastuzumab. We analyzed associations between sociodemographic factors, tumor characteristics, treatment regimens, and CVD risk factors with the primary outcomes of TIC and LVEF recovery, using multivariable logistic regression models. TIC was defined as > 10% decrease in LVEF to an overall LVEF < 50%; LVEF recovery as a return to a LVEF > 50%. RESULTS: Among 496 evaluable patients, median age was 53 years (IQR: 45.0-62.0) with 36.6% NHW, 15.8% non-Hispanic Black (NHB), 27.8% Hispanic, and 19.8% Other. Fifty-three (10.6%) patients developed TIC, half of whom experienced LVEF recovery. Compared to NHW, NHB had a higher rate of TIC (9.3% vs. 17.7%, respectively) and lower rate of LVEF recovery (70.6% vs. 21.4%, respectively), however, race/ethnicity was not a significant predictor of TIC after adjusting for confounders. Increasing age, lower baseline LVEF, anthracycline use, and presence of hypertension or coronary artery disease were significantly associated with TIC in multivariable analysis. CONCLUSIONS: TIC was more common among NHB compared to NHW, however, Black race was not consistently associated with TIC after adjustment for CVD risk factors. This suggests that CVD comorbidities (e.g., hypertension) that more frequently affect racial and ethnic minorities and are modifiable may explain differences in TIC incidence and recovery.

Effects of beta-blockers on quality of life and well-being in patients with myocardial infarction and preserved left ventricular function-a prespecified substudy from REDUCE-AMI.

AIMS: In the Randomized Evaluation of Decreased Usage of Beta-Blockers after Acute Myocardial Infarction (REDUCE-AMI) study, long-term beta-blocker use in patients after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction demonstrated no effect on death or cardiovascular outcomes. The aim of this prespecified substudy was to investigate effects of beta-blockers on self-reported quality of life and well-being. METHODS AND RESULTS: From this parallel-group, open-label, registry-based randomized clinical trial, EQ-5D, and World Health Organization well-being index-5 (WHO-5) questionnaires were obtained at 6-10 weeks and 11-13 months after AMI in 4080 and 806 patients, respectively. We report results from intention-to-treat and on-treatment analyses for the overall population and relevant subgroups using Wilcoxon rank sum test and adjusted ordinal regression analyses. Of the 4080 individuals reporting EQ-5D (median age 64 years, 22% female), 2023 were randomized to beta-blockers. The main outcome, median EQ-5D index score, was 0.94 [interquartile range (IQR) 0.88, 0.97] in the beta-blocker group, and 0.94 (IQR 0.88, 0.97) in the no-beta-blocker group 6-10 weeks after AMI, OR 1.00 [95% CI 0.89-1.13; P > 0.9]. After 11-13 months, results remained unchanged. Findings were robust in on-treatment analyses and across relevant subgroups. Secondary outcomes, EQ-VAS and WHO-5 index score, confirmed these results. CONCLUSION: Among patients after AMI with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction, self-reported quality of life and well-being was not significantly different in individuals randomized to routine long-term beta-blocker therapy as compared to individuals with no beta-blocker use. These results appear consistent regardless of adherence to randomized treatment and across subgroups which emphasizes the need for a careful individual risk-benefit evaluation prior to initiation of beta-blocker treatment.

Why Have We Not Been Able to Demonstrate Reduced Mortality in Patients With HFmrEF/HFpEF?

No randomized controlled trial has yet demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in mortality in patients with heart failure and mildly reduced ejection (HFmrEF) or heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), in contrast to the benefits observed in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, this probably reflects the statistical power of trials to date to show an effect on mortality rather than mechanistic differences between HFmEF/HFpEF and HFrEF or differences in treatment efficacy. Compared to patients with HFrEF, those with HFmrEF/HFpEF have lower mortality rates and a smaller proportion of potentially modifiable cardiovascular deaths (as opposed to unmodifiable noncardiovascular deaths). In addition, some causes of cardiovascular deaths may not be reduced by treatments for HF. Therefore, the low rate of potentially modifiable deaths in patients with HFmrEF/HFpEF, compared with HFrEF, has made it challenging to demonstrate a reduction in death (or cardiovascular death) in trials to date.

Strain surveillance during chemotherapy to improve cardiovascular outcomes: the SUCCOUR-MRI trial.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The detection of cancer therapy-related cardiac dysfunction (CTRCD) by reduction of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) during chemotherapy usually triggers the initiation of cardioprotective therapy. This study addressed whether the same approach should be applied to patients with worsening of global longitudinal strain (GLS) without attaining thresholds of LVEF. METHODS: Strain sUrveillance during Chemotherapy for improving Cardiovascular Outcomes (SUCCOUR-MRI) was a prospective multicentre randomized controlled trial involving 14 sites. Of 355 patients receiving anthracyclines with normal baseline LVEF, 333 patients (age 59±13 years, 79% women) with at least one other CTRCD risk factor, able to undergo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), GLS and 3D echocardiography were tracked over 12 months. A total of 105 patients (age 59±13 years, 75% women, 69% breast cancer) developing GLS-CTRCD (>12% relative reduction of GLS without a change in LVEF) between cardioprotection with neurohormonal antagonists versus usual care were randomized. The primary endpoint was 12-month change in MRI-LVEF; the secondary endpoint was MRI LVEF-defined CTRCD. RESULTS: During follow-up, 2 patients died and 2 developed heart failure. Most patients were randomized at 3 months (62%). Median doses of angiotensin inhibition/blockade and beta-blockade were 75% and 50% of respective targets; 21 (43%) had side-effects attributed to cardioprotection. Due to a smaller LVEF change from baseline with cardioprotection than usual care (-2.5±5.4% vs -5.6±5.9%, p=0.009), follow-up LVEF was higher after cardioprotection (59±5% vs 55±6%, p<0.0001). After adjustment for baseline LVEF, the mean (95% confidence interval) difference in the change in LVEF between the two groups was -3.6% (-1.8% to -5.5%, p<0.001). After cardioprotection, 1/49 patients developed 12-month LVEF-CTRCD, compared to 6/56 in usual care (p=0.075). GLS improved at 3 months post-randomization in the cardioprotection group, with little change with usual care. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with isolated GLS reduction after anthracyclines, cardioprotection is associated with better preservation of 12-month MRI-LVEF compared with usual care.

International prevalence of transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy in high-risk patients with heart failure and preserved or mildly reduced ejection fraction.

BACKGROUND: Transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM) is an underdiagnosed cause of heart failure (HF). METHODS: This epidemiology study assessed the international prevalence of ATTR-CM among patients aged ≥60 years with a history of HF, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) >40%, an end-diastolic interventricular septum thickness (IVST) ≥12 mm, but without diagnosed amyloidosis, history of LVEF ≤40%, cardiomyopathy of known cause, severe valvular, or coronary heart disease. ATTR-CM was determined using cardiac scintigraphy alongside exclusionary testing for light chain amyloidosis. The study was terminated early due to slow recruitment, without safety concerns. RESULTS: Overall, 56/315 (18%; 95% CI: 13.7-22.5) patients with evaluable scintigraphy had ATTR-CM, with a numerically higher prevalence in: Europe (24%) vs. other regions (9% Asia; 5% North America); at specialist vs non-specialist centres (26% vs. 11%); in males vs. females (24% vs. 10%); and in older vs. younger patients (e.g. >40% among those ≥85 years). Other risk markers (p<.05) included a history of carpal tunnel syndrome, higher N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide concentration, and higher end-diastolic IVST. CONCLUSIONS: ATTR-CM was diagnosed in 18% (95% CI: 13.7-22.5) of evaluable patients with HF, LVEF >40%, and risk markers for ATTR-CM, but no previous diagnosis of amyloidosis. Recruitment bias may have contributed to regional variability. NCT04424914.

Myocardial Mechanics in Acromegaly: A Meta-Analysis of Echocardiographic Studies.

INTRODUCTION: Evidence on myocardial deformation, detected by speckle tracking echocardiography (STE), in patients with acromegaly is scanty. AIM: The aim of the present meta-analysis was to provide an updated information on left ventricular (LV) systolic function assessed by global longitudinal strain (GLS) in patients with acromegaly and preserved LVEF. METHODS: Following the PRISMA guidelines, systematic searches were conducted across bibliographic databases (Pub-Med, OVID, EMBASE and Cochrane library) to identify eligible studies from inception up to June 30-2024. Clinical studies published in English reporting data on LV mechanics in patients with acromegaly and controls were included. The statistical difference of the echocardiographic variables of interest between groups such as LVEF and global longitudinal strain (GLS) was calculated by standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) by using random-effects models. RESULTS: Seven studies including 288 patients with acromegaly and 294 healthy individuals were considered for the analysis. Pooled average LVEF values were 64.6 ± 1.5% in the healthy control group and 64.0 ± 1.3% in the acromegaly group (SMD: - 0.21 ± 0.22, CI -0.62/0.22, p = 0.34); the corresponding values of GLS were - 19.1.1 ± 1.2% and - 17.5 ± 1.2% (SMD: -0.52 ± 0.27, CI - 1.05/0.01, p = 0.05). No difference was found between the two groups for both global circumferential strain (GCS) and global radial strain (GRS). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that patients with acromegaly in which LVEF is completely comparable to healthy controls show an impairment in GLS of borderline statistical significance. Whether GLS assessment can actually unmask early alterations of systolic function in patients with acromegaly better than LVEF will need to be investigated by future studies.

Post cardiac arrest left ventricular ejection fraction associated with survival to discharge.

Background: Post cardiac arrest left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is routinely assessed, but the implications of this are unknown. This study aimed to assess the association between post cardiac arrest LVEF and survival to hospital discharge. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, all in-hospital and out of hospital cardiac arrests at our tertiary care center between January 2012 and September 2015 were included. Baseline demographics, clinical data, characteristics of the arrest, and interventions performed were collected. Earliest post cardiac arrest echocardiograms were reviewed with LVEF documented. The primary outcome was survival to discharge. Results: A total of 736 patients were included in the analysis (mean age 58 years, 44% female). 15% were out of hospital cardiac arrest (24% shockable rhythm). After adjusting for covariates, patients with LVEF < 30% had 36% lower odds of surviving to hospital discharge than those with LVEF ≥ 52% (p = 0.014). Shockable initial rhythm and targeted temperature management were associated with improved survival. Conclusion: After a cardiac arrest, an initial LVEF < 30% is associated with significantly lower odds of survival to hospital discharge.

Predictors and Prognostic Factors of Heart Failure with Improved Ejection Fraction.

Background: Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) patients who have improved ejection fraction have a better prognosis than those with persistently reduced ejection fraction. This study aimed to analyze the predictors for progression of patients with HFrEF to heart failure with improved ejection fraction (HFimpEF), as well as their characteristics and analyze predictors for prognosis. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 1251 patients with HFrEF at baseline, who also had a second echocardiogram ≥ 3 months. After left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) reassessment, patients were separated into the HFimpEF group (n = 408) and the persistent HFrEF group (n = 611). The primary endpoint was a composite of cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization. Results: Multivariate logistic regression showed that without history of alcohol consumption (OR: 0.47, 95% CI: 0.28-0.78), non-New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III-IV (OR: 0.28, 95% CI: 0.15-0.52), without dilated cardiomyopathy (OR: 0.47, 95% CI: 0.26-0.84), concomitant hypertension (OR: 1.53, 95% CI: 1.02-2.29), ß -blockers use (OR: 2.29, 95% CI: 1.54-3.43), and lower uric acid (OR: 0.999, 95% CI: 0.997-1.000) could predict LVEF improvement. Kaplan-Meier curves demonstrated that HFimpEF patients had a significantly lower incidence of adverse events than HFrEF patients (log Rank p < 0.001). Multivariate Cox regression found that older age (HR: 1.04, 95% CI: 1.02-1.06), NYHA class III-IV (HR: 2.25, 95% CI: 1.28-3.95), concomitant valvular heart disease (HR: 1.98, 95% CI: 1.01-3.85), and higher creatinine (HR: 1.003, 95% CI: 1.001-1.004) were independent risk factors for the primary endpoint in HFimpEF patients. Conclusions: HFrEF patients without a history of alcohol consumption, non-NYHA class III-IV, without dilated cardiomyopathy, concomitant hypertension, ß -blockers use, and lower uric acid were more likely to have LVEF improvement. Although the prognosis of HFimpEF patients was better than that of HFrEF patients, older age, NYHA class III-IV, concomitant valvular heart disease, and higher creatinine were still risk factors for cardiovascular events in HFimpEF patients.

The Vectorcardiogram Characteristic and Its Predictive Value for Reduced Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction of Children with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy.

Background: The prognosis of Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is poor once it develops to the stage of cardiac impairment. Recent studies have demonstrated that electrocardiogram (ECG), which consists of general ECG and vectorcardiogram (VCG), retains an extremely powerful role in the assessment of patients with reduced left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction. However, data regarding VCG recordings in DMD and its prognostic value for reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of DMD have never been reported. This study aims to describe the characteristics of VCG in children with DMD and to explore the predictive value of VCG for reduced LVEF in children with DMD. Methods: A total of 306 patients with a known diagnosis of DMD confirmed by the genetic test were retrospectively enrolled at our hospital between August 2018 and August 2022. This resulted in a total study group of 486 VCG recordings. Among them, 75 DMD patients who underwent cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) later after one year follow-up were prospectively enrolled. The trend of VCG parameters of DMD patients across the different age span were compared with age-matched normal children. Concordance statistic analysis was further performed to assess the validity of VCG parameters in predicting the occurrence of reduced LVEF in patients with DMD. Results: DMD patients have a significantly higher heart rate, R waves in V1, QRS loop percentage in the right anterior quadrant in the horizontal plane (horizontal quadrant II) and QRS loop percentage in the anterior superior quadrant in the sagittal plane (sagittal quadrant IV) than normal children. Concordance statistic (C-statistic) showed an area under the curve of quadrant IV in the sagittal plane of baseline was 0.704. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve shows that quadrant IV in the sagittal plane of 7.57% was the optimal cutoff with a sensitivity of 53.3% and a specificity of 88.3% for predicting reduced LVEF in DMD patients. Conclusions: Our study firstly showed that QRS loop percentage in the right anterior quadrant in the horizontal plane (horizontal quadrant II) and QRS loop percentage in the anterior superior quadrant in the sagittal plane (sagittal quadrant IV) could be abnormal in DMD boys as early as before 5 years old. Evaluation of the myocardium by VCG in the early age to predict possible cardiac systolic dysfunction may have important implications for the ongoing management of DMD boys.

Clinico-radiological and pulmonary function assessment of post-COVID-19 patients with respiratory symptoms.

Background: Respiratory symptoms may persist for several weeks following the initial coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection. The aims and objectives were to assess the clinical symptoms, pulmonary functions, and radiological changes and to assess the cardio-vascular complications in post-COVID-19 patients. Methods: This observational study was conducted in the Department of Pulmonary Medicine in collaboration with the Department of Cardiology, SCBMCH, Cuttack, from March 2021 to August 2022 on 75 post-COVID-19 patients with respiratory symptoms from 4 weeks to 2 years after treatment for COVID-19 infection. Post-COVID patients having previous respiratory diseases were excluded from the study. Results: Among 75 patients, the most common age group was 18-30 years with a male-to-female ratio of 2.5:1. Based on O2 requirement, patients were divided into the mild symptomatic group and moderate to severe pneumonia group. The most common respiratory symptom was dyspnea, followed by cough with expectoration. Bilateral crepitations were found in 17% of cases. C-reactive protein (CRP) and D-dimer were increased in 38.6% and 32% of patients, respectively. 42.6% had abnormal chest X-ray, and the most common abnormal finding was reticular thickening. In spirometry, the restrictive pattern and mixed pattern were the predominant types documented in 49.3% and 13.3% of cases, respectively, which were significant in the moderate-severe group. Diffusion capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (DLCO) was performed in only 19 patients (mild group 13 and moderate-severe group 6). Twelve (63.2%) patients had abnormal DLCO. P- values were significant for RV (0.0482) and RV/TLC (0.0394). High-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) of the thorax was abnormal in 55.7% with the most common abnormalities as inter- and intra-lobular septal thickening. The left ventricular ejection fraction was preserved in all patients, with right atrium and right ventricle enlargement in 2.6% and pulmonary hypertension in 4.0% of participants. Conclusion: All post-COVID-19 patients having respiratory symptoms after recovery from acute COVID-19 may be referred by family care physicians to a dedicated post-COVID center for further evaluation, management, and early rehabilitation to decrease the morbidity in recovered patients. Persistent increased blood parameters like TLC, N/L ratio, RBS, CRP, and D-dimer seen in recovered post-COVID-19 patients. The long-term impact of CT findings on respiratory symptoms, pulmonary functions, and quality of life is unknown. Cardiovascular abnormalities in post-COVID-19 patients are infrequent.

Clinical outcomes of patients with heart failure and atrial fibrillation: Experience from an outpatient heart failure clinic in Colombia.

BACKGROUND: Heart failure (HF) can coexist with atrial fibrillation in up to 60 % of cases, increasing rates of hospitalizations and death. This study analyzed the clinical characteristics, treatment, hospitalization, and mortality of patients with HF and atrial fibrillation based on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). METHODS: A retrospective cohort study included patients from an outpatient HF clinic at Medellín (Colombia) between 2020-2022. Patients were classified into two groups according to LVEF: reduced (LVEF≤40 %) and mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction (LVEF>40 %). The evaluated outcomes were hospitalization and mortality during follow-up. Values for B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP), LVEF and functional class according to the New York Heart Association (NYHA) were also analyzed at admission and during the last follow-up visit. RESULTS: The study included 185 patients, with 51.9% being male. The median age of the participants was 80 years (interquartile range [IQR] 74 - 86). There was an overall improvement in the NYHA functional class, BNP levels, and LVEF compared with the baseline values, irrespective of left systolic function. Atrial fibrillation ablation was performed in 3.2 % of patients, and cardiac device implantation with atrioventricular node ablation in 29 %. No statistically significant differences were found in terms of hospitalization and mortality regarding left systolic function. CONCLUSION: Compressive optimal treatment for patients with HF and atrial fibrillation requires pharmacological treatment, ablation strategies, cardiac devices, cardiovascular rehabilitation and close follow-up. In this cohort, hospitalization and mortality rates were similar according to LVEF categories and there was improvement in NYHA functional class and BNP level.

EASIX (endothelial activation and stress index) predicts mortality in patients with coronary artery disease.

BACKGROUND: Coronary interventions reduce morbidity and mortality in patients with acute coronary syndrome. However, the risk of mortality for patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) additionally depends on their systemic endothelial health status. The 'Endothelial Activation and Stress Index' (EASIX) predicts endothelial complications and survival in diverse clinical settings. OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that EASIX may predict mortality in patients with CAD. METHODS: In 1283 patients undergoing coronary catheterization (CC) and having a diagnosis of CAD, EASIX was measured within 52 days (range - 1 year to - 14 days) before CC and correlated with overall survival. In an independent validation cohort of 1934 patients, EASIXval was measured within 174 days (+ 28 days to + 11 years) after CC. RESULTS: EASIX predicted the risk of mortality after CC (per log2: hazard ratio (HR) 1.29, 95% confidence interval: [1.18-1.41], p < 0.001) in multivariable Cox regression analyses adjusting for age, sex, a high-grade coronary stenosis ≥ 90%, left ventricular ejection fraction, arterial hypertension and diabetes. In the independent cohort, EASIX correlated with EASIXval with rho = 0.7. The long-term predictive value of EASIXval was confirmed (per log2: HR 1.53, [1.42-1.64], p < 0.001) and could be validated by integrated Brier score and concordance index. Pre-established cut-offs (0.88-2.32) associated with increased mortality (cut-off 0.88: HR training: 1.63; HR validation: 1.67, p < 0.0001 and cut-off 2.32: HR training: 3.57; HR validation: 4.65, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: We validated EASIX as a potential biomarker to predict death of CAD patients, irrespective of the timing either before or after catheterization.

Characteristics and outcomes of heart failure in Japan: A hospital-based administrative database analysis.

AIMS: Epidemiological and outcome studies on patients in Japan with heart failure (HF) categorized by left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) are currently limited. The aim of this non-interventional database study was to provide further information on these patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Administrative claims data and electronic medical records from hospitals participating in the Voluntary Hospitals in Japan (VHJ) organization were used. Patients hospitalized with a primary diagnosis of HF between 1 April 2017 and 30 March 2020 were categorized by baseline LVEF on echocardiogram: HF with reduced EF (HFrEF, LVEF <40%); HF with preserved EF (HFpEF, LVEF ≥50%); and HF with mildly reduced EF (HFmrEF, 40% to <50% LVEF). Patients were evaluated for baseline characteristics, pre-admission diagnosis, prescription drugs, length of hospitalization, HF treatment cost, overall cost of hospitalization, and in-hospital prescription. An exploratory analysis compared post-hospitalization mortality and re-hospitalization rates. In total, 10 646 hospitalized patients from 17 VHJ hospitals were enrolled. Of these, 7212 were included in the analysis set and categorized into HFpEF (3183, 44.1%), HFmrEF (1280, 17.7%), and HFrEF (2749, 38.1%) groups based on baseline LVEF. Beta-blocker use increased during hospitalization, with a mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) of 23.3% (22.3-24.3) of patients receiving these agents before admission versus 69.4% (68.3-70.5) at discharge. Administration of diuretics, angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) showed a similar trend. Differences in treatments were observed between HF categories at discharge, with a higher proportion (95% CI) of ACE inhibitor use in the HFrEF group (40.6% [38.7-42.4]) versus HFmrEF (27.5% [25.1-30.0]) and HFpEF (20.6% [19.2-22.1]) groups (P < 0.0001), and more ARB use in the HFmrEF and HFpEF groups (32.5% [29.9-35.1] and 31.2% [29.6-32.9], respectively) versus HFrEF (25.1% [23.5-26.8]; P < 0.0001). Mean (standard deviation [SD]) length of hospitalization was 22.2 (23.3) days, and the median (interquartile range) was 17 (11-25) days. Estimated average cost of HF treatment per patient during index hospitalization was 300 090 yen with HFrEF treatment costing the most. Average total healthcare expenditure during hospitalization was 1 225 650 yen per index hospitalization per patient, with HFrEF also the most expensive. During a mean (SD) observation period of 324 (304) days, ~21% of patients in each group required re-hospitalization for HF, and 625 patients (8.7%) died. CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of patients in each HF category was largely consistent with existing data. Discharge medications indicated high prescription of guideline-directed therapy. This study provides real-world data on patients with HF in Japan that can help inform future clinical decision-making.