Intravenous Immunoglobulins Alone for the Desensitization of Lung Transplant Recipients with Preformed Donor Specific Antibodies and Negative Flow Cytometry Crossmatch.

BACKGROUND: The lack of evidence regarding optimal desensitization strategies for lung transplant candidates with preformed donor specific anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies (DSAs) has led to varying approaches among centers towards this patient group. Our institution's desensitization protocol for recipients with preformed DSAs and negative flow cytometry crossmatch (FCXM) consists of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) as the sole therapy. The study aimed to determine outcomes using this approach. METHODS: This retrospective study included adults who underwent lung-only transplantation for the first time between January 2015 and March 2022 at a single center. We excluded patients with positive or missing FCXM results. Transplant recipients with any DSA ≥ 1000 MFI on latest testing within three months of transplant were considered DSA-positive, while recipients with DSAs <1000 MFI and those without DSAs were assigned to the low-level/negative group. Graft survival (time to death/retransplantation) and chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD)-free times were compared between groups using Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: Thirty-six out of 167 eligible patients (22%) were DSA-positive. At least 50% of preformed DSAs had documented clearance (decrease to <1000 MFI) within the first 6 months of transplant. Multivariable Cox regression analyses did not detect a significantly increased risk of graft failure (aHR 1.04 95%CI 0.55-1.97) or chronic lung allograft dysfunction (aHR 0.71 95%CI 0.34-1.52) in DSA-positive patients compared to patients with low-level/negative DSAs. Incidences of antibody-mediated rejection (p = 1.00) and serious thromboembolic events (p = 0.63) did not differ between study groups. CONCLUSION: We describe a single-center experience of administering IVIG alone to lung transplant recipients with preformed DSAs and negative FCXM. Further studies are required to confirm the efficacy of this strategy against other protocols.

The fate of anti-HLA antibodies following liver transplantation.

Introduction: Liver transplant recipients may have pre-formed anti-HLA antibodies directed to mismatched HLA of the liver donor (donor specific antibodies, DSA) or not directed to the liver donor (non-donor specific, non-DSA). We observed the fate of these antibodies (DSA and non-DSA) at 12 months after transplant. Methods: Patients transplanted between 4/2015 and 12/2018 (N = 216) who had anti-HLA antibody measurements at both transplant and 12 months posttransplant (N = 124) and with DSAs at transplant (N = 31) were considered informative for a paired analysis of the natural history of DSA and non-DSA following liver transplantation. Results: Class I DSAs and non-DSAs decreased between transplant and 12 months; however, Class I DSAs essentially disappeared by 12 months while Class I non-DSAs did not. Anti-HLA Class II DSAs performed differently. While there was a significant drop in values between transplant and 12 months, these antibodies mostly persisted at a low level. Discussion: Our study demonstrated a significant difference in the kinetics of DSA compared to non-DSA following liver transplantation, most profoundly for anti-HLA Class I antibodies. Class I DSAs were mostly absent at 12 months while Class II DSAs persisted, although at lower levels. The mechanisms of reduction in anti-HLA antibodies following liver transplantation are not completely understood and were not pursued as a part of this study. This detailed analysis of Class I and Class II DSAs and non-DSAs represents and important study to explore the change in antibodies at one year from liver transplantation.

Future directions in haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Outcomes of haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-SCT) have improved over time. Graft failure and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), which were important complications in major human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-disparity stem cell transplantation, have significantly decreased. These improvements have led to an exponential increase in the use of haploidentical donors for transplantation, as well as in the number of publications evaluating haplo-SCT outcomes. Many studies focused on factors important in donor selection, novel conditioning regimens or GVHD prophylaxis, the impact of donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSA), as well as strategies to prevent disease relapse post-transplant. DSA represents an important limitation and multimodality desensitization protocols, including plasma exchange, rituximab, intravenous immunoglobulin and donor buffy coat infusion, can contribute to the successful engraftment in patients with high DSA levels and is currently the standard therapy for highly allosensitized individuals. With regards to donor selection, younger donors are preferred due to lower risk of complications and better transplant outcomes. Moreover, recent studies also showed that younger haploidentical donors may be a better choice than older-matched unrelated donors. Improvement of disease relapse remains a top priority, and several studies have demonstrated that higher natural killer (NK) cell numbers early post-transplant are associated with improved outcomes. Prospective studies have started to assess the role of NK cell administration in decreasing post-transplant relapse. These studies suggest that the incorporation of other cell products post-transplant, including the administration of chimeric antigen receptor T-cells, should be explored in the future.

Waiting time for kidney transplantation based on calculated panel reactive antibodies: experience of a southern Brazilian center / Tempo de espera para transplante renal com base em painel de reatividade de anticorpos calculado: experiência de um centro do sul do Brasil

ABSTRACT Introduction: The aim of this study was to analyze the waiting list for kidney transplantation in our hospital according to candidate's panel reactive antibodies (cPRA) and its outcomes. Methods: One thousand six hundred forty patients who were on the waiting list between 2015 and 2019 were included. For the analysis, hazard ratios (HR) for transplant were estimated by Fine and Gray's regression model according to panel reactivity and HR for graft loss and death after transplantation. Results: The mean age was 45.39 ± 18.22 years. Male gender was predominant (61.2%), but the proportion decreased linearly with the increase in cPRA (p < 0.001). The distribution of patients according to panels were: 0% (n = 390), 1% - 49% (n = 517), 50% - 84% (n = 269), and ≥ 85% (n = 226). Transplantation was achieved in 85.5% of the sample within a median time of 8 months (CI 95%: 6.9 - 9.1). The estimated HRs for transplantation during the follow-up were 2.84 (95% CI: 2.51 - 3.34), 2.41(95%CI: 2.07 - 2.80), and 2.45(95%CI: 2.08 - 2.90) in the cPRA range of 0%, 1%-49%, and 50%-84%, respectively, compared to cPRA ≥ 85 (p < 0.001). After transplantation, the HR for graft loss was similar in the different cPRA groups, but the HR for death (0.46 95% CI 0.24-0.89 p = 0.022) was lower in the 0% cPRA group when adjusted for age, gender, and presence of donor specific antibodies (DSA). Conclusion: Patients with cPRA below 85% are more than twice as likely to receive a kidney transplantation with a shorter waiting time. The risk of graft loss after transplantation was similar in the different cPRA groups, and the adjusted risk of death was lower in nonsensitized recipients.

RESUMO Introdução: O objetivo foi analisar a lista de espera para transplante renal em nosso hospital segundo o painel de reatividade de anticorpos (PRAc) do candidato e seus desfechos. Métodos: Incluímos 1.640 pacientes em lista de espera entre 2015 e 2019. Para a análise, estimou-se a razão de risco (HR) para transplante pelo modelo de regressão de Fine e Gray conforme o painel de reatividade e HR para perda do enxerto e óbito após o transplante. Resultados: A idade média foi 45,39 ± 18,22 anos. Sexo masculino foi predominante (61,2%), mas a proporção diminuiu linearmente com o aumento do PRAc (p < 0,001). A distribuição de pacientes conforme os painéis foi: 0% (n = 390), 1% - 49% (n = 517), 50% - 84% (n = 269), e ≥85% (n = 226). O transplante foi realizado em 85,5% da amostra em tempo mediano de 8 meses (IC 95%: 6,9 - 9,1). As HRs estimadas para transplante durante o acompanhamento foram 2,84 (IC 95%: 2,51 - 3,34), 2,41 (IC 95%: 2,07 - 2,80) e 2,45 (IC 95%: 2,08 - 2,90) no intervalo de PRAc de 0%, 1%-49% e 50%-84%, respectivamente, comparadas com PRAc ≥ 85 (p < 0,001). Após o transplante, a HR para perda do enxerto foi semelhante nos diferentes grupos de PRAc, mas HR para óbito (0,46 IC 95% 0,24-0,89 p = 0,022) foi menor no grupo PRAc 0% quando ajustada para idade, sexo e presença de anticorpos doador específico (DSA). Conclusão: Pacientes com PRAc abaixo de 85% têm mais que o dobro de probabilidade de receber transplante renal com tempo de espera menor. Risco de perda do enxerto após o transplante foi semelhante nos diferentes grupos PRAc, e risco ajustado de óbito foi menor em receptores não sensibilizados.

T follicular helper cells expansion in transplant recipients correlates with graft infiltration and adverse outcomes.

Introduction: The process of immunization following vaccination in humans bears similarities to that of immunization with allografts. Whereas vaccination aims to elicit a rapid response, in the transplant recipient, immunosuppressants slow the immunization to alloantigens. The induction of CD4+CXCR5+ T follicular helper (Tfh) cells has been shown to correlate with the success of vaccine immunization. Method: We studied a cohort of 65 transplant recipients who underwent histological evaluation concurrent with PBMC isolation and follow-up sampling to investigate the phenotypic profiles in the blood and allotissue and analyze their association with clinical events. Results: The proportion of circulating Tfh cells was heterogeneous over time. Patients in whom this compartment increased had lower CCR7-PD1+CD4+CXCR5+ T cells during follow-up. These patients exhibited more alloreactive CD4+ T cells using HLA-DR-specific tetramers and a greater proportion of detectable circulating plasmablasts than the controls. Examination of baseline biopsies revealed that expansion of the circulating Tfh compartment did not follow prior intragraft leukocyte infiltration. However, multicolor immunofluorescence microscopy of the grafts showed a greater proportion of CXCR5+ T cells than in the controls. CD4+CXCR5+ cells were predominantly PD1+ and were in close contact with B cells in situ. Despite clinical stability at baseline, circulating Tfh expansion was associated with a higher risk of a composite of anti-HLA donor-specific antibodies, rejection, lower graft function, or graft loss. Conclusion: In otherwise stable patients post-transplant, circulating Tfh expansion can identify ongoing alloreactivity, detectable before allograft injury. Tfh expansion is relevant clinically because it predicts poor graft prognosis. These findings have implications for immune surveillance.

Incidence and Role of Recipient-Specific Antibodies in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation from Mismatched Related Donors.

High titer of donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) increases the risk of graft rejection after mismatched related hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). There are no data regarding the incidence of anti-HLA recipient-specific antibodies (RSAs) and their role after transplantation. Here we aimed to identify the incidence of RSAs in a mismatched related hematopoietic cell donor population and their possible impact on immune-mediated complications, such as acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD), and complications resulting from endothelial injury, such as transplantation-associated thrombotic microangiopathy (TA-TMA) and veno-occlusive disease (VOD). We prospectively analyzed the incidence of anti-HLA antibodies in 28 mismatched related pairs of recipients and their donors who underwent HCT at our center between 2020 and 2022. In positive samples screened for anti-HLA class I and/or II antibodies, the specificity of the HLA antibodies was analyzed. All recipients had a hematologic malignancy and received a myeloablative conditioning regimen and immunosuppression consisting of post-transplantation cyclophosphamide, tacrolimus, and mycophenolate mofetil. Patients were tested for TA-TMA and aGVHD development during routine post-transplantation visits up to 100 days post-transplantation. We used modified Jodele criteria for TA-TMA diagnosis, and based aGVHD grading on the MAGIC criteria. VOD was assessed using the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Anti-HLA antibodies were detected in 12 donors (43%) and in 9 recipients (32%). There were no significant differences between donors and recipients according to age (median, 42 years [range, 17 to 69 years] versus 39 years [range, 8 to 68 years]), sex, or pregnancy history. No transfusion history was noted in the donor group (P < .05). RSA antibodies were present more often than DSAs and were detected in 9 out of 12 (75%) anti-HLA-positive donors and in only 2 out of 9 (22%) recipients, respectively (P < .05). During the follow-up, 11 patients (39%) developed aGVHD, including grade I-II in 9 (32%) and grade III-IV in 2 (7%). Twelve patients (43%) met the criteria for TA-TMA, and only 1 patient (3.5%) was diagnosed with VOD by day 100 post-HCT. RSAs were detected significantly more often in the TA-TMA group; among 12 patients diagnosed with TA-TMA, 7 (58%) had RSAs (P < .05). We did not find a correlation between RSAs and aGVHD. The patient with VOD did not have an RSA-positive donor. There was no difference in membrane attack complex (MAC) concentration in the RSA-positive group on day 30 and day 60 post-HCT; however, there was a trend toward higher MAC concentration in the RSA-positive group on day 100 (median, 912 ng/mL [range, 788 to 1120 ng/mL] versus 616 ng/mL [range, 352 to 1244 ng/mL]; P = .055). Patients with RSA suffered more often from platelet and red blood cell decreases or transfusion refractoriness, and increased lactate dehydrogenase activity was observed in all RSA-positive cases. The donor immune status and the presence of RSA may be associated with higher rates of TA-TMA in mismatched HCT recipients. Antibody-mediated complement activation might be an additional factor influencing TA-TMA occurrence.

The impact of pre-transplant anti-HLA antibodies in transplants from HLA-identical sibling donors: A multicenter study.

Few studies have performed comparative analysis of the outcome of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation from HLA-identical sibling donors (ISD-HSCT) in patients with or without anti-HLA Abs. In this study we retrospectively collected data from a multicenter study to analyze the distribution and impact of the pre-existing anti-HLA Abs in ISD-HSCT. Among 402 recipients, 111 were positive for anti-HLA Abs. Gender, time from diagnosis to transplantation and distribution of primary disease might be risk factors for the occurrence of anti-HLA Abs. We found that patients with anti-HLA Abs had delayed neutrophil engraftment and were more vulnerable to experience Cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation. The presence of anti-HLA Abs was proved to be an independent risk factor for neutrophil engraftment (HR 1.42 95% CI 1.13-1.80, p = 0.003) and CMV reactivation (HR 2.03 95% CI 1.19-3.46, p = 0.009). We found that anti-HLA Abs have a negative impact on the prognosis in the early period after transplantation from sibling donors and anti-HLA Abs was also an independent risk factor for the overall survival (OS) at 180 days (HR 2.32, 95% CI 1.03-5.27, p = 0.042) among female recipients. In conclusion, anti-HLA Abs have a negative impact on the prognosis early after ISD-HSCT.

Complement and Non-Complement Binding Anti-HLA Antibodies Are Differentially Detected with Different Antigen Bead Assays in Renal Transplant Recipients.

Two semi-quantitative, Luminex-based, single-antigen bead (SAB) assays are available to detect anti-HLA antibodies and evaluate their reactivity with complement binding. Sera from 97 patients with positive panel reactive antibody tests (>5%) were analyzed with two SAB tests, Immucor (IC) and One-Lambda (OL), for anti-HLA antibody detection and the evaluation of their complement-binding capacity. IC detected 1608/8148 (mean fluorescent intensity (MFI) 4195 (1995-11,272)) and 1136/7275 (MFI 6706 (2647-13,184)) positive anti-HLA class I and II specificities, respectively. Accordingly, OL detected 1942/8148 (MFI 6185 (2855-12,099)) and 1247/7275 (MFI 9498 (3630-17,702)) positive anti-HLA class I and II specificities, respectively. For the IC assay, 428/1608 (MFI 13,900 (9540-17,999)) and 409/1136 (MFI 11,832 (7128-16,531)) positive class I and II specificities bound C3d, respectively. Similarly, OL detected 485/1942 (MFI 15,452 (9369-23,095)) and 298/1247 (MFI18,852 (14,415-24,707)) C1q-binding class I and II specificities. OL was more sensitive in detecting class I and II anti-HLA antibodies than IC was, although there was no significant difference in the number of class II specificities per case. MFI was higher for complement vs. non-complement-binding anti-HLA antibodies in both assays. Both methods were equal in detecting complement-binding anti-HLA class I antibodies, whereas the C3d assay was more sensitive in detecting complement-binding anti-HLA class II antibodies.

TNF-α -308A/G SNP association with kidney allograft rejection in Algerian population: A retrospective case-control study.

No consensus has been reached regarding the association beween the -308A/G single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in the tumor necrosis factor-α gene (TNFA) and kidney allograft rejection (KAR). Our retrospective case-control study aimed to assess the association of the SNP with KAR in Algerian patients who underwent kidney transplantation. The study enrolled 313 Algerian patients: 58 kidney-transplant recipients without rejection events (PWoR); 58 kidney-transplant recipients with at least one rejection event, with or without graft loss (PWR); and 197 healthy individuals (HI). The TNFA -308A/G SNP was genotyped using a real-time polymerase chain reaction. The results demonstrated that, the frequencies of TNFA -308A allele and AA genotype were higher in the PWR than in the HI groups (p = 0.001, OR = 2.26, CI = 1.33-3.77 and p = 0.0004, OR = 5.53, CI-1.89-16.6, respectively). Furthermore, the frequencies were higher among the PWR than among the PWoR groups (p = 0.001, OR = 3.29, CI = 1.56-7.21 and p = 0.0006, OR = 28.26, CI = 1.62-493.2, respectively), particularly among PWR patients with de novo anti-human leukocyte antigens (HLA) antibodies (PG-a-HLA-Ab). However, the frequency of TNFA -308G allele was lower in the PWR group than in the PWoR group (p = 0.001, OR = 0.3, CI = 0.1-0.64) and the HI group (p = 0.001, OR = 0.44, CI = 0.27-0.44). Our results suggest an association of the TNFA -308A/G alleles with KAR in Algerian patients who underwent kidney transplantation. Carriers of TNFA -308A allele who have PG-a-HLA-Ab might have a higher risk, whereas TNFA -308G allele carriers could have a lower risk of KAR. Thus, therapeutic strategies can be adapted to minimize KAR risk in patients who have a genetic proclivity for increased pro-inflammatory TNF-α activity.

Donor-Specific HLA Antibodies Are Associated with Graft Failure and Delayed Hematologic Recovery after Unrelated Donor Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation.

Graft failure (GF) is one of the major concerns after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) and remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. Although previous reports have associated the presence of donor-specific HLA antibodies (DSAs) with an increased risk of GF after unrelated donor allo-HCT, recent studies have failed to confirm this association. We sought to validate the presence of DSAs as a risk factor for GF and hematologic recovery in the unrelated donor allo-HCT setting. We retrospectively evaluated 303 consecutive patients who underwent their first unrelated donor allo-HCT at our institution between January 2008 and December 2017. DSA evaluation was performed using 2 single antigen bead (SAB) assays; DSA titration with 1:2, 1:8, and 1:32 dilutions; C1q-binding assay; and absorption/elution protocol to assess possible false-positive DSA reactivity. The primary endpoints were neutrophil and platelet recovery and GF, and the secondary endpoint was overall survival. Multivariable analyses were performed using Fine-Gray competing risks regression and Cox proportional hazards regression models. The median patient age was 14 years (range, 0 to 61 years), 56.1% were male, and 52.5% underwent allo-HCT for nonmalignant disease, Eleven patients (3.63%) were DSA-positive, including 10 with preexisting DSAs and 1 with post-transplantation de novo DSAs. Nine patients had 1 DSA, 1 patient had 2 DSAs, and 1 patient had 3 DSAs, with a median mean fluorescent intensity (MFI) of 4334 (range, 588 to 20,456) and 3581 (range, 227 to 12,266) in LABScreen and LIFECODES SAB assays, respectively. Overall, 21 patients experienced GF, including 12 with primary graft rejection, 8 with secondary graft rejection, and 1 with primary poor graft function. The cumulative incidence of GF was 4.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.2% to 6.6%) at 28 days, 6.6% (95% CI, 4.2% to 9.8%) at 100 days, and 6.9% (95% CI, 4.4% to 10.2%) at 365 days. In the multivariable analyses, DSA-positive patients had significantly delayed neutrophil recovery (subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR], .48; 95% CI, .29 to .81; P = .006) and platelet recovery (SHR, .51; 95% CI, .35 to .74; P = .0003) compared to patients without DSAs. In addition, only DSAs were significant predictors of primary GF at 28 days (SHR, 2.78; 95% CI, 1.65 to 4.68; P = .0001). The Fine-Gray regression also demonstrated that the presence of DSAs was strongly associated with a higher incidence of overall GF (SHR, 7.60; 95% CI, 2.61 to 22.14; P = .0002). DSA-positive patients with GF had significantly higher median MFI values than DSA-positive patients who achieved engraftment in the LIFECODES SAB assay using neat serum (10,334 versus 1250; P = .006) and in the LABScreen SAB at 1:32 dilution (1627 versus 61; P = .006). All 3 patients with C1q-positive DSAs failed to engraft. DSAs were not predictive of inferior survival (HR, .50; 95% CI, .20 to 1.26; P = .14). Our results validate the presence of DSAs as a significant risk factor for GF and delayed hematologic recovery after unrelated donor allo-HCT. Careful pretransplantation DSA evaluation may optimize unrelated donor selection and improve allo-HCT outcomes.

Luminex Crossmatch in kidney transplantation.

The introduction of the Luminex Crossmatch assay (LumXm) which uses Luminex bead technology, consists of extracting the donor's Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) molecules from their lymphocytes, and binding them to fluorescent beads that are put in contact with recipient's serum. HLA donor-specific antibodies (DSA) are detected using a fluorescent conjugate. The goal of our study is to determine the benefits of using LumXm in a renal transplantation algorithm. We tested 78 recipients' sera using the LumXm, and the results were compared with the Luminex single antigen bead assay (SAB) for all sera, as well as the Flow Cytometry Crossmatch (FCXM) for 46 sera. We compared our results with those of SAB using 3 cutoffs, the first being the manufacturer's criteria where sensitivity and specificity were at 62.5% and 91.3% respectively for HLA class 1, and 88.5% and 50.0% respectively for HLA class 2. When using the third cutoff criteria (≥2 Adjusted values + MFI [Mean fluorescence intensity] >500 + Neg MFI < 500), the sensitivity increased to 69.0% for HLA class 1 and decreased to 84.0% for HLA class 2, while the specificity increased for HLA class 1 and 2. When comparing with FCXM, the 3 assays agreed in 55.8% of results for class 1 and 2 alike. However, major discrepancies were found for two groups in HLA class 1 and one in HLA class 2. The LumXm when used with other techniques to overcome its' weak points, can provide an interesting insight into the patient's HLA-DSA profile.

Novel insights in the clinical management of hyperimmune patients before and after transplantation.

Despite improvements in anti-Human Leucocyte Antigens antibody detection, identification, and characterization offer a better in peri-operative management techniques, antibodies remain a serious cause of morbidity and mortality for patients both before and after organ transplantation. Hyperimmune patients are disadvantaged by having to wait longer to receive an organ from a suitably matched donor. They could benefit from desensitization protocols in both pre- and post-transplantation period. Clinical studies are underway to highlight which best desensitization strategies could be assure the best outcome in both heart and kidney transplantation. Although most clinical evidence about desensitization strategies by using anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies, proteasome inhibitors, anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies, interleukin-6 blockade, cysteine protease and complement inhibitors, comes from kidney transplantation studies, many of the debated novel concepts can be easily applied to desensitization also in heart transplantation. Here, we discuss the candidates and recipients' management by using most common standard of care and novel therapeutics, desensitization endpoints, and strategies for future studies.

Liver graft injury caused by de novo donor-specific HLA antibodies in pediatric liver transplant recipients with low, moderate, and high immunologic risk.

BACKGROUND: This study investigated the association between different risk levels of de novo donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies (dnDSAs) and liver graft injury after liver transplantation in pediatric patients. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study enrolled 130 patients after liver transplantation. Subjects were divided into the following 4 groups according to the mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of dnDSAs: high risk group(MFI ≥10,000), medium risk group(4000 ≤ MFI <10,000), low risk group(500 ≤ MFI <4000), and negative group(<500). Liver function indices were examined along with liver puncture biopsy，and the relationship between dnDSA risk level and liver injury after transplantation was assessed. RESULTS: Pediatric liver transplant recipients showed significant differences in liver function (ALT, AST, GGT and Bilirubin) according to dnDSA risk level (P < 0.05), and no differences in cumulative incidences of rejection (P = 0.413) and liver fibrosis (P = 0.978) were observed among the number of dnDSAs group. There were differences in the cumulative incidences of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) (P = 0.001) and T cell-mediated rejection （TCMR） (P = 0.003) across risk groups. The cumulative incidences of TCMR and liver fibrosis (P = 0.0001) were higher in the low-risk group than in the other 3 groups. There were no differences in graft survival rate (P = 0.846) across risk groups. CONCLUSION: DnDSAs in pediatric liver transplant recipients are associated with liver transplant rejection and fibrosis. The level of dnDSAs in low risk group should not be disregarded. Routine detection of dnDSAs has clinical utility for noninvasive risk stratification in this population.

Adverse effect of donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies directed at HLA-DP/-DQ on engraftment in cord blood transplantation.

BACKGROUND AIMS: While donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies (DSAs) in the recipient before transplantation are associated with graft failure in cord-blood transplantation (CBT), effects of DSAs other than against HLA-A, -B or -DRB1 on transplantation outcomes remained poorly understood. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 567 single-unit CBT recipients to evaluate impact of DSAs against HLA-DP and -DQ on CBT outcomes. RESULTS: Among 143 recipients (25.2%) who had anti-HLA antibodies, nine harbored DSAs against HLA-DP or -DQ. DSAs against HLA-DP or -DQ were associated with a significantly lower neutrophil engraftment rate (55.6% versus 91.8%, P = 0.032) and with a marginally lower platelet engraftment rate (46.7% versus 75.3%, P = 0.128) at day 100 after transplantation, compared with patients without anti-HLA antibodies. Time to neutrophil and platelet engraftment in patients with DSAs for HLA-DP or -DQ was significantly longer than that in patients without anti-HLA antibodies (median, 25 versus 21 days, P = 0.002 in neutrophil; median 61 versus 46 days, P = 0.014 in platelet). Cumulative incidence of bacterial infection at day 100 was significantly greater (88.9% versus 57.1%, P = 0.024), and re-transplant-free survival was marginally lower (55.6% versus 76.8%, P = 0.132) in patients with DSAs against HLA-DP or -DQ, compared with those without anti-HLA antibodies. These findings suggest that DSAs against HLA-DP or -DQ lead to unfavorable engraftment, which may increase risk of bacterial infection, and reduce survival soon after CBT. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest the importance of evaluating DSAs against HLA-DP and -DQ in recipients before selecting CB units.

DETERMINATION OF THE PRA POSITIVITY PERCENTAGE IN MALE PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE BY USING FLOW CYTOMETRY TECHNIQUE.

The antibodies directed against human leukocyte antigen (HLA) molecules, which play a crucial role in allograft histocompatibility, are called anti-HLA antibodies. Anti-HLA antibodies against foreign HLA molecules may be present in patients with chronic kidney disease even before transplantation. The panel reactive antibody (PRA) test is used to measure the renal transplant candidate's immune sensitivity to HLA molecules other than their own HLA molecules by assessing the diversity of anti-HLA antibodies in the blood of these patients. This study aimed to determine the PRA values and the percentage of PRA positivity of Turkish male patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), who had not been sensitized by the major known causes (those with no history of organ or tissue transplantation, those with no history of blood transfusion), who had not been diagnosed with any autoimmune diseases, and who had not been under immunosuppressive treatment. The study included 60 male patients aged over 18 years. All of the patients were followed up with a diagnosis of CKD at the Nephrology Clinic, Internal Medicine Department, Akdeniz University Medical Faculty Hospital. None of the patients included in the study was sensitized by a known mechanism previously (they did not have blood transfusion or organ transplantation). Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) levels of all patients were below the level of 60 mL/min/1.73 m2. Patient data including their age information, etiology of CKD, accompanying diseases, and information about dialysis modalities were recorded. HLA antibody percentage was determined by the flow cytometry technique. Statistical data analysis was performed by using SPSS 22.0 (Statistical Package for Social Sciences, Version 22.0). The values of p less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Twenty patients were receiving dialysis treatment due to end-stage renal disease. Of the 60 patients included in the study, 25% showed PRA positivity; 28.3% of all study patients were found to be positive for anti-HLA class I antibodies and 26.7% of all study patients were found to be positive for anti-HLA class II antibodies on separate analysis for anti-HLA class I and anti-HLA class II antibody positivity. When the patients were categorized as PRA negative and PRA positive in two groups, there were no differences between the groups according to mean age, percentage of hemodialysis patients, percentage of peritoneal dialysis patients and presence of accompanying chronic diseases (such as hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, nephrolithiasis, coronary artery disease). In addition to this, evaluation of the GFR levels showed that the PRA positive group contained a significantly higher percentage of end-stage renal disease patients (GFR <15 mL/min/1.73 m2) as compared with the PRA negative group. Detailed analysis of the percentages of PRA levels in the PRA positive patients, which was carried out to determine the degree of sensitization, showed that the PRA values were over 80% in 11.77% of the patients positive for anti-HLA class I antibodies. On the other hand, PRA values were within the range of 15%-80% in 88.23% of the patients who had anti-HLA class II antibodies. The PRA values were below 80% in all of the patients positive for anti-HLA class II antibodies and those positive for both anti-HLA class I and class II antibodies. In conclusion, PRA levels of the candidates for kidney transplantation should always be measured to assess their state of sensitization before transplantation, even though they have no risk factors known to cause anti-HLA antibody development.

Is Salvage of a Kidney Graft Possible as a Result of Hyperacute Rejection Immediately After Kidney Transplantation?

Hyperacute rejection is a rare complication of renal transplantation. It is mainly caused by preformed human leukocyte antigen antibodies and can lead to the loss of the transplanted kidney. Renal transplantation is a highly beneficial treatment for people with end-stage renal disease, greatly improving their quality of life. However, antibody-mediated rejection is a significant challenge for the long-term survival of transplanted kidneys. An 18-year-old male with nephrotic syndrome, who underwent bilateral renal nephrectomy due to severe proteinuria, received a living donor kidney. Pretransplant panel reactive antibodies were low. Cytotoxic T- and B-cell and non-HLA cross-match was negative. The graft became cyanotic and mottled within half an hour of transplantation. Allograft was quickly extracted, and a biopsy showed hyperacute rejection. The patient was treated with plasmapheresis, intravenous immunoglobulin, and eculizumab. The graft was successfully re-implanted after 18 hours. Further treatment included additional sessions of plasmapheresis, intravenous immunoglobulin, eculizumab, T-cell-depleting agent, and immunosuppressive therapy. Serum creatinine became stable, and renal biopsy after one month demonstrated intact parenchyma with no inflammation or fibrosis. This case highlights the critical importance of promptly removing the transplanted kidney and using aggressive immunotherapy to save renal allografts in cases of hyperacute rejection.

ATG-Fresenius increases the risk of red blood cell transfusion after kidney transplantation.

Introduction: In sensitized deceased donor kidney allograft recipients, the most frequent induction therapy is anti-thymocyte globulins (ATG), including Thymoglobulin® (Thymo) and ATG-Fresenius (ATG-F). Methods: We conducted a 3-year monocentric observational study to compare the impact of ATGs on hematological parameters. We included adult kidney transplant recipients treated with ATG induction therapy, either Thymo or ATG-F, on a one-in-two basis. The primary endpoint was red blood cell (RBC) transfusions within 14 days after transplantation. Results: Among 309 kidney allograft recipients, 177 (57.2%) received ATG induction, 90 (50.8 %) ATG-F, and 87 (49.2%) Thymo. The ATG-F group received significantly more RBC transfusions (63.3% vs. 46% p = 0.02) and in bigger volumes (p = 0.01). Platelet transfusion was similar in both groups. Within 14 and 30 days after transplantation, older age, ATG-F induction, and early surgical complication were independently associated with RBC transfusion. Patient survival rate was 95%, and the death-censored kidney allograft survival rate was 91.5% at 12 months post-transplantation. There was no difference in the incidence of acute rejection and infections or in the prevalence of anti-HLA donor-specific antibodies. Discussion: In conclusion, after kidney transplantation, ATG-F is an independent risk factor for early RBC transfusion and early thrombocytopenia without clinical and biological consequences. These new data should be clinically considered, and alternatives to ATG should be further explored.

A Case of Daratumumab-Induced Significant Decrease in Donor-Specific HLA Antibodies and Remission Induction Before Haploidentical Stem Cell Transplantation in a Refractory B-ALL Patient.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the method of eliminating donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSA) in haploidentical stem cell transplantation (haplo-SCT). METHODS: We present a refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) patient who had strongly positive DSA, but had no human leukocyte antigen-matched donor. Although CD38 expression on leukemia cells was negative, daratumumab combined with etoposide and venetoclax therapy was chosen for her. RESULTS: She achieved a significant decrease in DSA levels and complete remission on the combination therapy with daratumumab. She then received a haplo-SCT from a daughter as a donor and had a successful engraftment of donor stem cell. In haplo-SCT, strongly positive DSA levels, directed against donor HLA antigens, could be significantly reduced by daratumumab therapy before transplantation and successfully bridge subsequent haplo-SCT. CONCLUSION: Although CD38 expression is negative in leukemia cells, refractory B-ALL patients may still benefit from combination therapy with daratumumab. We need further clinical observation.

Rationale and Protocol of the Multimodality Evaluation of Antibody-Mediated Injury in Heart Transplantation (LEONE-HT) Observational Cross-Sectional Study.

INTRODUCTION: Heart transplant (HT) survival has barely improved in the last decades, which is unsatisfactory for many HT recipients. The development of anti-human leukocyte antigen (anti-HLA) antibodies in HT patients is associated with a cardiac allograft dysfunction. The mechanisms leading to this damage are unclear. The Multimodality Evaluation Of Antibody-Mediated Injury In Heart Transplantation (LEONE-HT) study aimed to thoroughly describe the damage inflicted on the myocardium by anti-HLA antibodies. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The LEONE-HT study is a cohort study with a cross-sectional approach in which HT patients with positive anti-HLA antibodies are compared with coetaneous HT patients with negative anti-HLA antibodies. All patients will undergo a state-of-the-art multimodal assessment, including imaging techniques, coronary anatomy and physiology evaluations and histological and immunological analyses. The individual and combined primary outcomes of structural graft injuries and longitudinal secondary outcomes are to be compared between the exposed and non-exposed groups with univariate and multivariable descriptive analyses. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The LEONE-HT study is carried out in accordance with the principles set out in the Declaration of Helsinki and the International Conference on Harmonization guidelines for good clinical practice and following national laws and regulations. The study design, objectives and participant centers have been communicated to clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05184426). The LEONE-HT study counts on the support of patient associations to disseminate the objectives and results of the research. This study was funded by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation and the Spanish Society of Cardiology.