Evaluation of Guilan University of Medical Sciences medical interns' attitudes regarding breaking bad news to patients based on the SPIKES model, 2020 to 2022.

BACKGROUND: Bad news may be defined as "any information which adversely and seriously affects an individual's view of his or her future." It seems necessary for physicians to use a specific method to break the bad news to patients properly. Due to the importance of this skill and its effects on patient's hope and motivation to continue his treatment process, in this study, we evaluate the interns of Guilan University of Medical Sciences' attitude to breaking bad news (BBN) to the patients based on strategy for BBN, perception of condition or seriousness, invitation from the patient to give information, knowledge: giving medical facts, explore emotions, and sympathize (SPIKES) model in 2020-2022. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this cross-sectional study in Iran, 153 Guilan University of Medical Sciences interns were selected as a census sample in 2020-2022. A self-administered questionnaire collected the information with standard tests confirming its reliability and validity. The collected data were described and analyzed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) 16. The Chi-square test was used to measure the statistical relationship between the demographic variables and the entire questionnaire. Also, a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test was used to measure the relationship between the average age and the scores obtained from the four main areas and the entire questionnaire. A statistical level of less than 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: 43.1% of the interns were men, and 56.9% were women. The mean attendance age was 26.12 ± 1.32, the minimum age was 23, and the maximum was 33. Only 8.5% of the interns in this study had been taught about BBN, and most participants announced that they feel pressure and anxiety when BBN to patients. The attitude of interns in this study was not satisfying in all four parts of the study: individual preference (54.2% of participants showed poor attitude), preparing environmental conditions for BBN (60.8% of participants showed poor attitude), how to break bad news (52.3% of participants showed poor attitude), and the things that are done after BBN (52.9% of participants showed poor attitude). CONCLUSION: Based on the results, the attitude of the interns who had participated in this study was not satisfactory. Due to the importance of this communication skill to reduce physician anxiety and best control patients' reactions, managing courses in the undergraduate curriculum seems necessary.

Clinical nurses' experiences about "breaking bad news" during the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Nurses have the most contact with COVID-19 patients and their families, while it is unclear how nurses react when they give bad news during pandemic disaster, particularly in the cultural and social context of Iran. So, our main purpose was to explore the experiences of clinical nurses about breaking bad news (BBN) in the context of the COVID-19 epidemic era. MATERIALS AND METHOD: The study was a qualitative content analysis approach. Data were collected by the purposive sampling method through in-depth interviews with 13 nurses in Isfahan University of Medical Sciences. The method of data analysis was conventional qualitative content analysis. RESULTS: The participants of this study were 13 nurses. The work experience range was from 2 to 18 years, and in terms of education, one of them was Ph.D., eight had a bachelor's degree education, and four had a master's degree in nursing. Qualitative data of content analysis were obtained in four main categories such as nurses' avoidance of BBN, considering the patient's and family's beliefs in BBN, nurses' unpreparedness to deliver bad news during the pandemic crisis, and surrender of the patient and family members in the face of the COVID-19 bad news. CONCLUSION: The results of the research showed that due to probability of occurrence of pandemic in the futureand also the nature of the nursing profession, so nurses should be familiar with the correct ways of BBN and existing protocols on crisis conditions and cultural and religious context of the society to provide a high quality of care for patients and their families.

How to break the news in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis/motor neuron disease: practical guidelines from experts.

In amyotrophic lateral sclerosis/motor neuron disease (ALS/MND), it is necessary to communicate difficult news during the initial diagnosis and throughout the disease trajectory as the condition progresses. However, delivering difficult news to people with ALS/MND is an emotionally demanding task for healthcare and allied health professionals-one for which many feel ill-prepared because of limited training in this area. Ineffective communication of difficult news damages the patient-provider relationship and negatively impacts patient quality of life (QoL). To address this issue, we developed the A-L S-PIKES protocol based on available literature and our extensive clinical experience. It provides easy-to-follow, stepwise guidelines to effectively deliver difficult news to people with ALS/MND (PALS) that includes: Advance Preparation (preparing for the discussion logistically and emotionally); Location & Setting (creating a comfortable setting that fosters rapport); Patient's Perceptions (assessing PALS' understanding and perception of their condition); Invitation (seeking PALS' permission to share information); Knowledge (sharing information in a clear, understandable manner); Emotion/Empathy (addressing emotions with empathy and providing emotional support); and Strategy & Summary (summarizing the discussion and collaboratively developing a plan of action). A-L S-PIKES provides practical guidelines on how to prepare for and conduct these challenging conversations. It emphasizes effective communication tailored to the individual needs of PALS and their families, empathy, sensitivity, and support for PALS' emotional well-being and autonomy. The aim of A-L S-PIKES is to both enhance skills and confidence in delivering difficult news and to improve the QoL of PALS and their families. Future studies should systematically evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of A-L S-PIKES to establish its utility in clinical practice.

Interpretative structural modeling method: An analysis of influencing factors analysis on the adverse experiences of cardiac surgery patients in the intensive care units.

Objective: To construct an interpretation structure model of adverse experiences of cardiac surgery patients in intensive care unit, so as to provide a reference for optimizing the experience of critical patients step by step. Methods: Literature review, semi-structured interviews, questionnaires and Delphi method were used to summarize and analyze the influencing factors of intensive care experience in cardiac surgery. The explanatory structural model was used to divide the influencing factors into levels and construct the explanatory structural model of adverse experience of cardiac surgery patients in intensive care. Results: A hierarchical structure model containing 34 elements and 15 levels was constructed, which were divided into Surface level, middle level and root level. Conclusion: The intensive care experience of patients in cardiac surgery department is mainly affected by 34 factors. There are direct or indirect correlations between the influencing factors, and different levels have different effects.

Health professionals' views and experiences of breaking bad news in the Eastern Mediterranean Region: a scoping review.

Introduction: Breaking bad news is a critical yet challenging aspect of healthcare that requires effective communication skills, empathy, and cultural sensitivity. Health professionals in the World Health Organization's (WHO) Eastern Mediterranean Region face unique cultural and social factors distinct from other parts of the world. This scoping review aims to comprehensively explore the peer-reviewed literature on the health professionals' experiences in delivering bad news within the WHO's Eastern Mediterranean Region. Methods: This scoping review was conducted according to the Joanna Brigg Institute's scoping review methodology and reported utilizing the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews extension for scoping review (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. A search using a combination of keywords and MeSH terms related to "breaking bad news" and "health professionals" was performed in PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, EBSCO, ERIC via Embase, and Dar Almandumah (Arabic) databases. Common themes were synthesized from studies conducted in the WHO's Eastern Mediterranean Region. Results: Out of 4,883 studies initially identified in the databases, 24 studies met the inclusion criteria, involving a total of 4,710 participants, including physicians, nurses, and residents. The studies were published between 2006 and 2022, predominantly from Iran (n = 12). The majority employed a cross-sectional design (n = 21) or mixed methods (n = 3), with a notable absence of qualitative studies. No studies used theoretical frameworks. More than half of the studies (n = 14) reported that participants had positive attitudes toward breaking bad news. This positivity was evident in their willingness to share bad news, perceived possession of adequate knowledge, positive attitudes, having received training, awareness of accepted approaches, and adherence to protocols. The lack of training and limited awareness of established protocols like SPIKES, ABCDE, and BREAKS for breaking bad news were major concerns among participants. Conclusion: The scoping review reveals both positive and negative experiences of breaking bad news by health professionals in the WHO's Eastern Mediterranean Region. Most studies highlight the need for culturally sensitive targeted education and training programs on breaking bad news. Further research, particularly using qualitative methodologies and theoretical frameworks is warranted.

"I couldn't say goodbye": Thematic analysis of interviews with bereaved relatives who lost their loved ones during the COVID-19 pandemic.

BACKGROUND: Delivering serious news is usually challenging for healthcare professionals and the pandemic of COVID-19 and related restrictions brought additional challenges in this process. AIMS: To explore the experience of bereaved relatives with receiving serious news from healthcare professionals during the pandemic COVID-19. DESIGN: A qualitative study using thematic analysis and a codebook approach of data collected in semi-structured interviews with bereaved relatives. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Data were collected from July to August 2022 in person/via phone with bereaved relatives who lost their relatives during the pandemic (from March 2020 to March 2022). Participants were recruited using a convenience sample and snowball method through social media and through one university hospital palliative care unit that invited bereaved relatives of deceased patients treated at the unit to participate in this study. RESULTS: A total of 22 participants, consisting of 4 men and 18 women, were interviewed for this study. Most of the participants were sons or daughters of individuals who had died (5 grandchildren, 14 sons/daughters, 2 spouses, 1 great-niece). Six themes were identified: Burden caused by visit ban, Fear of COVID-19, Inappropriate behaviour and communication of healthcare professionals, High need for emotional support, Need for detailed and honest communication, Tendency to make excuses for mistakes and lapses by healthcare professionals. CONCLUSIONS: Delivering serious news during a pandemic was negatively influenced by a lack of contact with patients and a lack of support and empathetic communication with staff. Overcoming these circumstances can be achieved by frequent communication using various communication tools (such as videoconferences or phone calls), and maintaining empathy and honesty in the communication process.

Breaking bad news: an active learning method for medical students.

BACKGROUND: Breaking bad news is one of the most difficult aspects of communication in medicine. The objective of this study was to assess the relevance of a novel active learning course on breaking bad news for fifth-year students. METHODS: Students were divided into two groups: Group 1, the intervention group, participated in a multidisciplinary formative discussion workshop on breaking bad news with videos, discussions with a pluri-professional team, and concluding with the development of a guide on good practice in breaking bad news through collective intelligence; Group 2, the control group, received no additional training besides conventional university course. The relevance of discussion-group-based active training was assessed in a summative objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) station particularly through the students' communication skills. RESULTS: Thirty-one students were included: 17 in Group 1 and 14 in Group 2. The mean (range) score in the OSCE was significantly higher in Group 1 than in Group 2 (10.49 out of 15 (7; 13) vs. 7.80 (4.75; 12.5), respectively; p = 0.0007). The proportion of students assessed by the evaluator to have received additional training in breaking bad news was 88.2% (15 of the 17) in Group 1 and 21.4% (3 of the 14) in Group 2 (p = 0.001). The intergroup differences in the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale and Jefferson Scale of Empathy scores were not significant, and both scores were not correlated with the students' self-assessed score for success in the OSCE. CONCLUSION: Compared to the conventional course, this new active learning method for breaking bad news was associated with a significantly higher score in a summative OSCE. A longer-term validation study is needed to confirm these exploratory data.

Addressing unreliable local models in federated learning through unlearning.

Federated unlearning (FUL) is a promising solution for removing negative influences from the global model. However, ensuring the reliability of local models in FL systems remains challenging. Existing FUL studies mainly focus on eliminating bad data influences and neglecting scenarios where other factors, such as adversarial attacks and communication constraints, also contribute to negative influences that require mitigation. In this paper, we introduce Local Model Refining (LMR), a FUL method designed to address the negative impacts of bad data as well as other factors on the global model. LMR consists of three components: (i) Identifying and categorizing unreliable local models into two classes based on their influence source: bad data or other factors. (ii) Bad Data Influence Unlearning (BDIU): BDIU is a client-side algorithm that identifies affected layers in unreliable models and employs gradient ascent to mitigate bad data influences. Boosting training is applied when necessary under specific conditions. (iii) Other Influence Unlearning (OIU): OIU is a server-side algorithm that identifies unaffected parameters in the unreliable local model and combines them with corresponding parameters of the previous global model to construct the updated local model. Finally, LMR aggregates updated local models with remaining local models to produce the unlearned global model. Extensive evaluation shows LMR enhances accuracy and accelerates average unlearning speed by 5x compared to comparison methods on MNIST, FMNIST, CIFAR-10, and CelebA datasets.

Navigating obstetric bad news: Insights from tertiary care medical teams.

OBJECTIVES: To analyze the self-reported perception of obstetric medical teams regarding the practice of delivering bad news in public and private hospitals. METHODS: Cross-sectional study considering physicians delivering obstetric care at the Municipal Hospital Vila Santa Catarina, Municipal Hospital Dr. Moysés Deutsch, and Albert Einstein Israelite Hospital, in São Paulo, Brazil. The applied questionnaire reflected the steps of the SPIKES protocol for delivering difficult news, with the questions adapted to obstetric and fetal medicine practice context. RESULTS: Specialists self-reported higher levels of knowledge, better emotional management, and superior strategy planning and summarization skills than residents. Participants with more than five years of experience reported higher knowledge levels, better emotional management, and superior strategy development skills. When comparing professionals from private and public hospitals, no significant differences emerged in self-reported communication aspects. CONCLUSIONS: Experience duration significantly influences professionals' impressions in their ability to provide information, manage emotions, and plan post-diagnosis. Specialists and those with more years of experience self-report enhanced readiness in executing communication steps effectively. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Our findings underscore the importance of tailored training and experience in navigating sensitive medical conversations in the field of Obstetrics.

Combining Mitomycin C with inhibition of BAD phosphorylation enhances apoptotic cell death in advanced cervical cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Mitomycin C (MMC), a DNA-damaging chemotherapeutic, is commonly used clinically for recurrent cervical carcinoma (CC), either alone or in combination. MMC generates DNA damage resulting in CC cell death yet also induces increased AKT-BAD phosphorylation associated with drug resistance and reduced clinical benefit. The present study evaluates the efficacy of combined MMC and a BAD phosphorylation inhibitor in CC. METHODS: The association and function of phosphorylation of BAD on serine 99 (pBADS99) for cell survival of both MMC-resistant or sensitive-CC cells was explored. BAD was mutated to BADS99A to examine the requirement of BADS99 for CC cell survival and a novel small-molecule inhibitor of pBADS99 was utilized. Cell proliferation, survival, foci formation, and patient-derived organoids (PDOs) assays were utilized to determine efficacy, synergy and related mechanisms. RESULTS: MMC IC50 was positively correlated to the cell line pBADS99/BAD ratio. Increased BADS99 phosphorylation was observed in both MMC-sensitive or -resistant CC cells after MMC treatment. Inhibition of pBADS99 in CC cell lines produced synergistic apoptosis through BAD-mediated apoptotic pathways and enhanced DNA damage in response to MMC. The concurrent use of pharmacological inhibition of pBADS99 and MMC was synergistic, resulting in diminished cell viability and inducing apoptotic cell death in MMC-sensitive and -resistant CC cell lines or patient-derived organoids. CONCLUSION: A combination of MMC with inhibition of BAD phosphorylation potentiated efficacy compared to single agent treatment. The potential further development of such strategies may provide outcome benefits to patients with CC.

Assessment of the Quality and Readability of Web-Based Arabic Health Information on Halitosis: Infodemiological Study.

BACKGROUND: Halitosis, characterized by an undesirable mouth odor, represents a common concern. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to assess the quality and readability of web-based Arabic health information on halitosis as the internet is becoming a prominent global source of medical information. METHODS: A total of 300 Arabic websites were retrieved from Google using 3 commonly used phrases for halitosis in Arabic. The quality of the websites was assessed using benchmark criteria established by the Journal of the American Medical Association, the DISCERN tool, and the presence of the Health on the Net Foundation Code of Conduct (HONcode). The assessment of readability (Flesch Reading Ease [FRE], Simple Measure of Gobbledygook, and Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level [FKGL]) was conducted using web-based readability indexes. RESULTS: A total of 127 websites were examined. Regarding quality assessment, 87.4% (n=111) of websites failed to fulfill any Journal of the American Medical Association requirements, highlighting a lack of authorship (authors' contributions), attribution (references), disclosure (sponsorship), and currency (publication date). The DISCERN tool had a mean score of 34.55 (SD 7.46), with the majority (n=72, 56.6%) rated as moderate quality, 43.3% (n=55) as having a low score, and none receiving a high DISCERN score, indicating a general inadequacy in providing quality health information to make decisions and treatment choices. No website had HONcode certification, emphasizing the concern over the credibility and trustworthiness of these resources. Regarding readability assessment, Arabic halitosis websites had high readability scores, with 90.5% (n=115) receiving an FRE score ≥80, 98.4% (n=125) receiving a Simple Measure of Gobbledygook score <7, and 67.7% (n=86) receiving an FKGL score <7. There were significant correlations between the DISCERN scores and the quantity of words (P<.001) and sentences (P<.001) on the websites. Additionally, there was a significant relationship (P<.001) between the number of sentences and FKGL and FRE scores. CONCLUSIONS: While readability was found to be very good, indicating that the information is accessible to the public, the quality of Arabic halitosis websites was poor, reflecting a significant gap in providing reliable and comprehensive health information. This highlights the need for improving the availability of high-quality materials to ensure Arabic-speaking populations have access to reliable information about halitosis and its treatment options, tying quality and availability together as critical for effective health communication.

Transforming Communication on Serious Illness and Frailty: A Comprehensive Approach to Empowering Informed Decision-Making.

Health care professionals can enhance conversations about serious illness and medical decision-making by adopting a transparent, standardized approach. This article critiques established communication strategies, which often emphasize patient values and goals without providing the necessary medical information to align these goals with a shared understanding of prognosis. We propose an alternate strategy that (1) provides detailed explanations of medical conditions at the beginning of the conversation, (2) includes support persons in discussions, (3) considers capacity, and (4) offers tailored advice by clinicians. The proposed framework aims to provide patients (or their delegates) with the information they need to integrate their values in pursuit of well-informed medical decisions. This strategy builds trust by providing honest information about medical conditions and their trajectories. It empowers decision makers to consider realistic outcomes, allowing them to accept or reject treatments in accordance with their preferences. This article presents a thorough step-by-step guide on how to conduct a serious illness conversation and facilitate medical decision-making, including a supplement that provides example phrases for use in clinical practice.

Addressing Worker Safety and Health Through the Lens of Strategic Enforcement-Part One.

Ensuring the safety and health of workers in this country, who are employed at millions of workplaces that present a dizzying array of hazards, is daunting. Every day, workers are maimed or die from workplace injuries or occupational illnesses. Hence, government agencies must use all available means to ensure the laws intended to keep workers safe and healthy in their workplaces are maximally effective in accomplishing that purpose. This paper addresses this challenge through the lens of strategic enforcement. It examines how federal and state authority are designed to interact to ensure worker protection in this space, and focuses on what tools for deterring violations - many unrecognized or underutilized by worker safety agencies - are available to leverage the limited resources that inevitably constrain the agencies' reach. The forthcoming Part II will, among other things, showcase a number of noteworthy state and local initiatives that exceed the federal standard.

Guiding Through Challenging Psychedelic Experiences and "Bad Trips".

Psychedelic substances have gained recognition for their therapeutic potential, but they also present challenges, with individuals occasionally experiencing distressing episodes referred to as challenging experiences or, in the recreational setting, "bad trips". Trial therapists and physicians, but also healthcare professionals in emergency rooms, need a comprehensive strategy to effectively manage these cases. Three case reports are presented to underline the problem and propose strategies for handling these situations. Finally, this article outlines a stepwise approach, encompassing helpful interventions, supportive care, and rescue medication, to ensure the well-being of individuals undergoing challenging psychedelic experiences and prevent further complications and long-term harm.

Digital spatial profiling identifies the tumor center as a topological niche in prostate cancer characterized by an upregulation of BAD.

Prostate cancer is characterized by a high degree of intratumoral heterogeneity. However, little is known about the spatial distribution of cancer cells with respect to specific functional characteristics and the formation of spatial niches. Here, we used digital spatial profiling (DSP) to investigate differences in protein expression in the tumor center versus the tumor periphery. Thirty-seven regions of interest were analyzed for the expression of 47 proteins, which included components of the PI3K-AKT, MAPK, and cell death signaling pathways as well as immune cell markers. A total of 1739 data points were collected from five patients. DSP identified the BCL-2 associated agonist of cell death (BAD) protein as the most significantly upregulated protein in the tumor center. BAD upregulation was confirmed by conventional immunohistochemistry, which furthermore showed a phosphorylation of BAD at serine 112 indicating its inactivation. Knockdown of BAD in prostate cancer cells in vitro led to decreased cell viability and colony growth. Clinically, high BAD expression was associated with a shorter time to biochemical recurrence in 158 mostly high-risk prostate cancer patients. Collectively, our results suggest that the tumor center is a topological niche with high BAD expression that may drive prostate cancer progression.

The impact of an adapted SPIKES protocol vs routine care in the delivery of bad news to IVF patients: an exploratory pilot multicenter randomized controlled trial.

PURPOSE: Determine if the SPIKES method was associated with less distress and more compassion than current modes of delivering negative pregnancy test results to patients undergoing in vitro fertilization. METHODS: Twenty-seven nurses from two centers were randomized to use the modified SPIKES script or continue their standard of care; 136 patients with a negative hCG following embryo transfer were included. SPIKES nurses received 1 h of training by a study psychologist; nurses in the control group were instructed to deliver the news as done previously. Patients who underwent embryo transfer and received a call by a participating nurse with a negative test result received an email invitation on the following day. RESULTS: Control patients reported significantly less distress than SPIKES patients; 33% of SPIKES patients reported that they had felt "extremely sad," compared to 15.2% of the control patients (p = 0.01). Perceived compassion did not differ between the groups (all p ≥ 0.22). CONCLUSION: Patients who received a negative pregnancy test result from the nurses who received a brief training and a script on how to deliver bad news via the modified SPIKES protocol reported significantly more distress than patients receiving negative results from nurses utilizing their standard of care. It is unclear whether a modified SPIKES method to deliver negative pregnancy test results will benefit patients undergoing in vitro fertilization. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical trials.gov NCT04917445.

Stop Asking How Much Information Your Patient Wants Before Discussing Serious News.

Discussing serious news is a fundamental communication skill, and many clinicians have been taught to ask their patients how much detail they want to hear before sharing difficult information. Over the past decade, we have taught hundreds of medical students how to discuss serious news and reviewed hundreds of their recorded conversations. We've found that asking how much detail a patient wants to hear often results in confusion and is not an effective way to understand their communication preferences. Instead of asking how much detail your patient wants to hear, we propose an alternative way to tailor information to their needs when discussing serious news. By asking permission to share, presenting the news in a succinct, jargon-free headline, and providing emotional support and expert guidance at the right times, you can give the correct amount of detail while avoiding unnecessary confusion resulting in high-quality, patient centered communication every time you discuss serious news.

Assessing expert reliability in determining intracranial EEG channel quality and introducing the automated bad channel detection algorithm.

Objective.To evaluate the inter- and intra-rater reliability for the identification of bad channels among neurologists, EEG Technologists, and naïve research personnel, and to compare their performance with the automated bad channel detection (ABCD) algorithm for detecting bad channels.Approach.Six Neurologists, ten EEG Technologists, and six naïve research personnel (22 raters in total) were asked to rate 1440 real intracranial EEG channels as good or bad. Intra- and interrater kappa statistics were calculated for each group. We then compared each group to the ABCD algorithm which uses spectral and temporal domain features to classify channels as good or bad.Main results.Analysis of channel ratings from our participants revealed variable intra-rater reliability within each group, with no significant differences across groups. Inter-rater reliability was moderate among neurologists and EEG Technologists but minimal among naïve participants. Neurologists demonstrated a slightly higher consistency in ratings than EEG Technologists. Both groups occasionally misclassified flat channels as good, and participants generally focused on low-frequency content for their assessments. The ABCD algorithm, in contrast, relied more on high-frequency content. A logistic regression model showed a linear relationship between the algorithm's ratings and user responses for predominantly good channels, but less so for channels rated as bad. Sensitivity and specificity analyses further highlighted differences in rating patterns among the groups, with neurologists showing higher sensitivity and naïve personnel higher specificity.Significance.Our study reveals the bias in human assessments of intracranial electroencephalography (iEEG) data quality and the tendency of even experienced professionals to overlook certain bad channels, highlighting the need for standardized, unbiased methods. The ABCD algorithm, outperforming human raters, suggests the potential of automated solutions for more reliable iEEG interpretation and seizure characterization, offering a reliable approach free from human biases.

Pressure to not feel bad among (different-sex) romantic partners: prevalence, and correlates.

Western society generally highly values happiness. As a result, people sometimes experience pressure not to feel negative emotions. In this study, we comprehensively investigated this pressure, and how it manifests itself, in adult romantic relationships. Specifically, we first examined when, how often and how intensely people experience pressure not to feel bad from their romantic partners (94 different-sex couples). Additionally, we investigated (both between- and within-person) how this pressure is related to context (presence of, contact and or conflict with a partner), emotional processes (i.e. experienced sadness and anxiety, emotion suppression, and how their partner perceived their affect), and relationship well-being. Using experience sampling methodology data (6/14 reports per day over one week) we found that although participants generally did not experience strong pressure from their partner, they experienced some feelings of pressure about 50% of the time. Furthermore, within-person predictors associated with negative processes/emotions (i.e. negative emotions, conflict, emotion suppression) were related to the momentary frequency (odds) and/or intensity of perceived pressure not to feel bad. At the between-person level, individuals who experience more sadness, anxiety and reported suppressing their emotions more often tended to experience more and/or stronger pressure. Only weak associations with relationship well-being were found.