Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 355
Filter
1.
Immunol Res ; 2024 Oct 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39354177

ABSTRACT

We analysed the change in the positioning of belimumab (BLM) in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) treatment in the first decade of real-life use, by providing data about patients treated by this biological drug in the Sapienza Lupus Cohort. We evaluated SLE patients treated by BLM according to the current clinical practice. Data of each patient were collected, focusing on previous and concomitant treatments. Finally, the drug retention rate was assessed. Since August 2013, 138 SLE patients started BLM (M/F 7/131; median age 49 years, IQR 13.25; median disease duration 214 months, IQR 180). To evaluate the change in BLM positioning, we divided patients according to the date of starting treatment as below: patients treated from 2013 to 2018 (period 1) and those treated since 2019 to date (period 2). Indeed, the median number of previous immunosuppressant drugs was significantly higher in patients treated in period 1 [3 (IQR 1.25) versus 1 (IQR 1.75), p = 0.0002]. Furthermore, 15.9% of patients treated in period 2 were not previously treated by immunosuppressant drugs, compared with 5.2% in period 1 (p = 0.01). Finally, the 24-month drug survival was significantly higher in patients previously treated with ≤ 1 immunosuppressant drug in comparison with those treated with ≥ 2 drugs (69.1% versus 43.4%, p = 0.0097, HR 0.49; 95% CI 0.27-0.88). Our data clearly described the progressive anticipation of BLM prescription in the first 10 years of clinical practice, underlining as choosing earlier biological agents could positively influence the drug retention rate.

2.
PeerJ ; 12: e18028, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39308826

ABSTRACT

Objective: The use of belimumab in treating lupus nephritis (LN) patients in China is still in its early stages. This retrospective comparative study aims to delineate the disease activity, associated therapies, clinical outcomes, and adverse events among LN patients treated with belimumab, reflecting real-world experience in southeastern China. Methods: From May 2020 to December 2023, 54 LN patients treated with belimumab and 42 LN patients treated with conventional therapy were enrolled. All patients had a follow-up period of more than 3 months. The general information, presenting clinical and laboratory data, and outcomes were collected and compared. Results: At 3 months of belimumab treatment, compared to baseline, there was a decrease in proteinuria from 74.1% to 64.8% (p < 0.001), a reduction in hematuria from 59.3% to 37.0% (p = 0.008), and an increase in partial or complete renal response from 53.7% to 75.9% (p < 0.001). The median SLEDAI score decreased from 10 to 5 (p < 0.001), and the proportion of patients achieving low lupus disease activity state (LLDAS) increased from 11.11% to 16.67% (p < 0.001) by the 3-month evaluation. Notably, there were significant reductions in oral corticosteroid dosages, with a median decrease from 30 to 17.5 mg/day (p < 0.001) by 3 months, and the proportion of patients requiring >5 mg/day of steroids decreased from 88.89% at baseline to 79.07% at six months (p < 0.001). Compared to the conventional therapy group, the belimumab group experienced a significant reduction in median steroid dosage and increased the proportion of patients achieving remission or LLDAS. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was significantly lower in the belimumab group (29.6% vs 52.4%, p = 0.024). Conclusion: These findings support the potential of belimumab to improve renal and serological parameters, reduce disease activity, lessen corticosteroid dependence, and decrease the risk of TEAEs, demonstrating its safety and efficacy as an adjunct therapy in LN management.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Immunosuppressive Agents , Lupus Nephritis , Proteinuria , Humans , Lupus Nephritis/drug therapy , Female , Retrospective Studies , Male , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/adverse effects , China , Adult , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Immunosuppressive Agents/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome , Proteinuria/drug therapy , Middle Aged , Hematuria/drug therapy
3.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39288317

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This study investigated the efficacy, safety, and predictive factors of belimumab (BEL) in induction therapy for patients with proliferative lupus nephritis (LN) in real-world settings. METHODS: Patients with biopsy-proven ISN/RPS class III or IV LN, with or without coexisting class V LN, who underwent standard of care (SoC), glucocorticoid (GC), and either mycophenolate mofetil or cyclophosphamide treatments were included. Participants were treated with SoC (SoC group, n = 32) or BEL and SoC (BEL+SoC group, n = 30). The primary end point was complete renal response (CRR) at 52 weeks. RESULTS: Baseline patient characteristics were not significantly different between the two groups. The 52-week retention rate of BEL was 90.0%. The BEL+SoC group showed significantly higher CRR and primary efficacy renal response achievement at 52 weeks and significantly lower GC dosage, adverse events, and Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics damage index scores. Multivariate analysis of CRR achievement at 52 weeks revealed that the lack of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) improvement at 4 weeks was associated with CRR failure in the SoC group. A shorter duration (cut-off of 42 days) between the start of induction therapy and addition of BEL was also related to the CRR in the BEL+SoC group. CONCLUSION: BEL, in addition to SoC, controls disease activity, reduces GC use, and suppresses organ damage in case of proliferative LN. Earlier BEL induction within 6 weeks may help achieve CRR in treatment-resistant cases without eGFR improvement at 4 weeks after induction therapy.

4.
Arthritis Res Ther ; 26(1): 163, 2024 Sep 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39294688

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy and safety of belimumab in the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in a real-world setting and provide a valuable reference for clinical treatment. METHODS: In this retrospective study, 101 patients with SLE who came to our hospital from March 2020 to September 2022, 56 of whom with lupus nephritis (LN), were selected. All patients received belimumab in combination with standard of care(SoC)therapy regimen for more than 52 weeks and their clinical/laboratory data, assessment of disease activity, glucocorticoids dosage and occurrence of adverse events were recorded. Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS) and DORIS remission as a primary goal in the treatment of SLE. The groups were classified according to the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2 K): SLEDAI-2 K < 6 was categorized as the mild group (mild activity) and SLEDAI-2 K ≥ 6 was categorized as the active group (moderate-severe activity). The disease of the two groups mentioned above were assessed using the SELENA-SLEDAI Flare Index (SFI) and the SLE Responder Index-4 (SRI-4), respectively. Furthermore, we used complete remission (CR) and partial remission (PR) in the kidney as the standard for efficacy evaluation for LN patients. RESULTS: After 52 weeks of treatment with belimumab, patients' complement levels increased significantly (p < 0.05); Other indicators such as 24-hour urine protein quantification and daily glucocorticoids dose decreased compared to pretreatment (p < 0.05). At 52 weeks, (i) after evaluation, the whole group of patients showed significant improvement in their condition; (ii) 55.4% of patients achieved LLDAS and 23.8% achieved DORIS remission; (iii) 73.2% of patients with LN achieved CR, 16.1% achieved PR. Adverse reactions were observed in 15 patients (14.9%), all of which normalized after symptomatic treatment. CONCLUSIONS: In general, during treatment with belimumab, immunological and biochemical indices improved in SLE patients, urinary protein levels were reduced in LN patients, and the rate of renal function remission was effectively increased; At the same time, the use of belimumab is associated with a low frequency of side effects, good overall tolerability and a favorable safety profile.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Immunosuppressive Agents , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Female , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/drug therapy , Male , Adult , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Middle Aged , Treatment Outcome , Remission Induction/methods , Glucocorticoids/therapeutic use , Lupus Nephritis/drug therapy , Young Adult
5.
Pharmacol Res Perspect ; 12(4): e1255, 2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39096038

ABSTRACT

In this study, plasma belimumab concentrations were measured over the course of treatment in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients on belimumab therapy, and intra- and interindividual variations in plasma belimumab concentration were evaluated. A single-center prospective study was conducted at Oita University Hospital to evaluate trough plasma concentrations over the course of treatment in 13 SLE patients treated with intravenous belimumab. Plasma belimumab concentrations were measured by a validated ultra-high performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry method. The median age of the patients was 40 (interquartile range: 35-51) years and the median weight was 51.8 (47.0-58.1) kg. A mean of 9.4 (range: 1-13) blood samples was collected per patient at routine visits. The mean (± SD) plasma belimumab concentration was 33.4 ± 11.9 µg/mL in the patient with the lowest concentration and 170.0 ± 16.6 µg/mL in the patient with the highest concentration, indicating a 5-fold difference between patients. On the other hand, the within-patient coefficient of variation ranged from 7.1% to 35.7%, showing no large variations. No significant correlation was observed between plasma belimumab concentration and belimumab dose (mg/kg) (Spearman's rank correlation coefficient = 0.22, p = .54). Examinations of trough plasma belimumab concentrations over the course of treatment in patients with SLE showed small intraindividual variation but large interindividual variation. Plasma belimumab trough concentration varied widely among patients administered the approved dose.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Immunosuppressive Agents , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic , Humans , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/drug therapy , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/blood , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/pharmacokinetics , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/administration & dosage , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/blood , Adult , Female , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Male , Immunosuppressive Agents/pharmacokinetics , Immunosuppressive Agents/blood , Immunosuppressive Agents/administration & dosage , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Tandem Mass Spectrometry , Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid , Drug Monitoring/methods
6.
Immun Inflamm Dis ; 12(8): e1362, 2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39172013

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of belimumab in patients with early systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), defined as having a disease duration of less than 6 months. METHODS: We retrospectively identified patients with SLE in the early stage who received belimumab and standard of care (belimumab group) or standard of care alone (control group) since September 2020. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to reduce potential bias. The primary endpoint was lupus low disease activity status (LLDAS) at weeks 12 and 24. The secondary endpoints were remission and the proportion of glucocorticoid dose tapering to 7.5 mg/day. The efficacy of belimumab in patients with lupus nephritis was also assessed. RESULTS: Out of 111 eligible patients, 16 patients in the belimumab group and 31 patients in the control group were identified by 1:2 PSM. At week 24, a significantly higher proportion of individuals achieved low disease activity state (LLDAS) in the belimumab group compared to the control group (56.3% vs. 19.4%, OR = 5.357, 95% CI = 1.417 to 20.260, p = 0.013). Furthermore, more patients in the belimumab group were reduced to low-dose glucocorticoid ( ≤ 7.5 mg/day) at week 24 (75.0% vs. 35.5%, OR = 5.182, 95%CI = 1.339 to 20.058, p = 0.017). Significant improvements in Patient Global Assessment scores were observed at Week 12 and 24 for those treated with belimumab compared to controls. In a subgroup analysis evaluating the efficacy of belimumab in patients with lupus nephritis, 42.9% of the seven individuals treated with belimumab achieved a complete renal response (CRR) by Week 24, and no instances of disease relapse were observed. CONCLUSIONS: In SLE patients with a disease duration of less than 6 months, belimumab treatment can promote LLDAS achievement and reduce glucocorticoid dose, leading to a better prognosis. Introducing belimumab in the early stage of SLE may be a beneficial decision.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Immunosuppressive Agents , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic , Propensity Score , Humans , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/administration & dosage , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/drug therapy , Female , Male , Adult , Retrospective Studies , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Immunosuppressive Agents/administration & dosage , Treatment Outcome , Middle Aged , Glucocorticoids/therapeutic use , Glucocorticoids/administration & dosage , Lupus Nephritis/drug therapy
7.
Cureus ; 16(7): e64596, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39149687

ABSTRACT

Secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is a life-threatening hyperinflammatory condition caused by the hyperactivation of macrophages and T-cells, triggered by infection, malignancy, or underlying rheumatological conditions. It rarely presents as a first manifestation of a rheumatological condition. Macrophage activation syndrome (MAS) is secondary HLH associated with underlying hematological conditions. Here, we present a case of a previously healthy 29-year-old female who was admitted with fever, rash, and pancytopenia, found to have HLH, and a workup revealed underlying systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). She was successfully treated with dexamethasone, etoposide, and belimumab, with complete recovery of her symptoms. This case highlights the importance of a thorough evaluation of rheumatological conditions in all patients with HLH despite their previous medical history and the use of belimumab for SLE.

8.
Mod Rheumatol ; 2024 Aug 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39096517

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to describe the treatment selection for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) using data from the Kyushu Collagen Disease Network for SLE (KCDN-SLE) registry, a multicenter prospective registry in Japan. METHODS: This study used data from patients registered between August 2022 and November 2023. Clinical characteristics, purpose of agent initiation, other candidate agents, and short-term efficacy and safety were evaluated. RESULTS: We analyzed 69 previously treated patients with SLE (mean age 43.7 years; 62 females, 7 males). Hydroxychloroquine, biological agents, and immunosuppressive agents were initiated during the maintenance phase in 12, 41, and 16 patients, respectively. In patients with active organ involvement, hydroxychloroquine and biological agents were widely used for initiation. In those who already achieved treatment goals, biological agents alone were predominantly selected. The SLE Disease Activity Index 2000 score and prednisolone dose declined significantly over a 6-month follow-up period. Among 48 patients with active disease, 22 achieved a lupus low disease activity state, but this had no evident association with the initiation of a biological agent. In total, 14 adverse events, predominantly infections, were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Biological agents were used preferentially, and the therapeutic agents were appropriately effective and mostly achieved the purpose of agent initiation.

9.
Int J Mol Sci ; 25(16)2024 Aug 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39201667

ABSTRACT

Lupus Nephritis (LN) still represents one of the most severe complications of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) and a major risk factor for morbidity and mortality. However, over the last few years, several studies have paved the way for a deeper understanding of its pathogenetic mechanisms and more targeted treatments. This review aims to provide a comprehensive update on progress on several key aspects in this setting: pathogenetic mechanisms of LN, including new insight into the role of autoantibodies, complement, vitamin D deficiency, and interaction between infiltrating immune cells and kidney resident ones; the evolving role of renal biopsy and biomarkers, which may integrate information from renal histology; newly approved drugs such as voclosporin (VOC) and belimumab (BEL), allowing a more articulate strategy for induction therapy, and other promising phase III-immunosuppressive (IS) agents in the pipeline. Several adjunctive treatments aimed at reducing cardiovascular risk and progression of chronic renal damage, such as antiproteinuric agents, represent an important complement to IS therapy. Furthermore, non-pharmacological measures concerning general lifestyle and diet should also be adopted when managing LN. Integrating these therapeutic areas requires an effort towards a holistic and multidisciplinary approach. At the same time, the availability of an increasingly wider armamentarium may translate into improvements in patient's renal outcomes over the next decades.


Subject(s)
Lupus Nephritis , Humans , Lupus Nephritis/pathology , Lupus Nephritis/etiology , Lupus Nephritis/drug therapy , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Biomarkers , Animals , Autoantibodies/immunology
10.
Biomedicines ; 12(7)2024 Jul 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39062171

ABSTRACT

Although rituximab is not specifically approved for the treatment of warm autoimmune hemolytic anemia (WAIHA), the First International Consensus Group recommends considering its use as part of the initial therapy for patients with severe disease and as a second-line therapy for primary WAIHA. Some patients do not respond to rituximab, and relapses are common. These relapses are associated with elevated B-cell-activating factor (BAFF) levels and the presence of quiescent long-lived plasma cells (LLPCs) in the spleen. A new group of immunomodulatory drugs, B-cell-activating factor inhibitors (BAFF-i), demonstrated efficacy in multiple autoimmune diseases and have the potential to improve WAIHA treatment outcomes by targeting B-cells and LLPCs. This article reviews the role of BAFF in autoimmune disorders and the currently available literature on the use of BAFF-directed therapies in various immunologic disorders, including WAIHA. Collectively, the clinical data thus far shows robust potential for targeting BAFF in WAIHA therapy.

11.
Adv Kidney Dis Health ; 31(3): 234-245, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39004463

ABSTRACT

Lupus nephritis (LN) is a severe complication of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and is one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in patients with SLE. It is estimated that up to 60% of individuals with SLE will develop LN, which can manifest at any stage of a patient's life; however, it commonly emerges early in the course of SLE and tends to exhibit a more aggressive phenotype in men compared to women. Black and Hispanic patients are more likely to progress to kidney failure than white patients. LN is characterized by kidney inflammation and chronic parenchymal damage, leading to impaired kidney function and potential progression to kidney failure. This article provides a comprehensive overview of the epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and management of LN, highlighting the importance of early recognition and treatment of LN to prevent progressive, irreversible kidney damage and improve patient outcomes. Additionally, the article discusses current and emerging therapies for LN, including traditional immunosuppressive agents, biological agents, and novel therapies targeting specific pathways involved in LN pathogenesis, to provide a practical guide for clinicians in properly diagnosing LN and determining a patient-centered treatment plan.


Subject(s)
Immunosuppressive Agents , Lupus Nephritis , Lupus Nephritis/diagnosis , Lupus Nephritis/therapy , Humans , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Disease Progression
12.
J Immunol Methods ; 532: 113717, 2024 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38960066

ABSTRACT

Monitoring belimumab concentrations in patients can be a valuable tool for assessing treatment response and for personalizing drug doses. Various assay formats may be used to measure concentrations of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies. A particularly useful format involves the use of anti-idiotype monoclonal antibodies, selected to be highly specific to the antibody of interest. Here, we describe the development of a specific, high-affinity anti-idiotype antibody to belimumab, and the application of this antibody in a homologous sandwich ELISA to measure belimumab concentrations.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Anti-Idiotypic , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Drug Monitoring , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/immunology , Humans , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/methods , Drug Monitoring/methods , Antibodies, Anti-Idiotypic/immunology , Animals , Immunosuppressive Agents/blood
13.
Expert Opin Investig Drugs ; 33(8): 801-814, 2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38958085

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The advent of biological therapies has already revolutionized treatment strategies and disease course of several rheumatologic conditions, and monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting cytokines and interleukins represent a considerable portion of this family of drugs. In systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) dysregulation of different cytokine and interleukin-related pathways have been linked to disease development and perpetration, offering palatable therapeutic targets addressable via such mAbs. AREAS COVERED: In this review, we provide an overview of the different biological therapies under development targeting cytokines and interleukins, with a focus on mAbs, while providing the rationale behind their choice as therapeutic targets and analyzing the scientific evidence linking them to SLE pathogenesis. EXPERT OPINION: An unprecedented number of clinical trials on biological drugs targeting different immunological pathways are ongoing in SLE. Their success might allow us to tackle present challenges of SLE management, including the overuse of glucocorticoids in daily clinical practice, as well as SLE heterogenicity in treatment response among different individuals, hopefully paving the way toward precision medicine.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal , Drug Development , Interleukins , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic , Humans , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/drug therapy , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/immunology , Antibodies, Monoclonal/pharmacology , Antibodies, Monoclonal/administration & dosage , Interleukins/antagonists & inhibitors , Interleukins/immunology , Animals , Molecular Targeted Therapy , Cytokines/metabolism , Cytokines/antagonists & inhibitors , Cytokines/immunology , Precision Medicine , Glucocorticoids/pharmacology , Glucocorticoids/administration & dosage , Biological Therapy/methods
14.
Front Immunol ; 15: 1423035, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38947321

ABSTRACT

Objective: To collect real-world data regarding the attainment of the early-achieved lupus low disease activity state (LLDAS) in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients receiving telitacicept or belimumab treatment, and identify factors predictive of target achievement. Methods: Eighty-seven SLE patients who received telitacicept (N=42) or belimumab (N=45) were retrospectively reviewed in this observational study. Clinical and laboratory data, disease activity assessment, and glucocorticoid dosage were collected for analysis. Achieving LLDAS at least once within 24 weeks post-treatment was considered as early-achieved LLDAS. Multivariate regression was used to assess baseline predictive variables for early-achieved LLDAS. Subgroup analysis and interaction tests were also performed to examine the robustness of the results across different sets of baseline characteristics. Prognostic stratification for early-achieved LLDAS was established based on the identified risk factors. Results: During the 24-week follow-up period, LLDAS was achieved by at least one time in 49.43% (43/87) of the patients, with sustained achievement through week 24 observed in 36 out of these 43 patients (83.27%). Multivariate analysis revealed that early achievement of LLDAS was particularly observed in patients with higher baseline lymphocyte counts [HR=1.79, 95% CI (1.19-2.67), P=0.005]and serum albumin levels [HR=1.06, 95% CI (1.003-1.12), P=0.039]. Conversely, hematological involvement [HR=0.48, 95% CI (0.24-0.93), P=0.031] predicted lower attainment of early-achieved LLDAS. The use of telitacicept was associated with a reduced risk of failing to attain early achievement of LLDAS [HR=2.55, 95% CI (1.36-4.79), P=0.004]. Subgroup analyses and interaction tests showed a stable relationship between the telitacicept use and LLDAS achievement. The results remained consistent across all subgroup analyses. Significant differences (P<0.001) were observed in the Kaplan-Meier estimates for LLDAS among risk groups based on the number of identified risk factors. Conclusion: The achievement of LLDAS is attainable in the management of SLE patients undergoing treatment with telitacicept or belimumab in real-life clinical practice. Baseline lymphocyte counts, serum albumin levels, hematological involvement and the use of telitacicept serve as robust predictors for early-achieved LLDAS, helping to identify patients who are likely to benefit on the treatment.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic , Humans , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/drug therapy , Female , Male , Adult , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Severity of Illness Index , Prognosis
15.
Arch Rheumatol ; 39(2): 172-179, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38933729

ABSTRACT

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the early effectiveness and safety of belimumab in addition to standard therapy in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) for 24 weeks. Patients and methods: This retrospective study was conducted with 60 adult patients with active SLE between June 2020 and August 2022. The patients either received intravenous belimumab in addition to standard therapy (n=31; 24 females, 7 males; mean age: 33.7±14.1 years; range, 18 to 52 years) or only standard therapy (n=29; 22 females, 7 males; mean age: 34.1±13.4 years; range, 19 to 66 years) for 24 weeks. Outcome measures, including safety and effectiveness (Safety of Estrogens in Lupus Erythematosus National Assessment-Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index [SELENA-SLEDAI]), changes in biomarkers (double-stranded DNA [deoxyribonucleic acid]), serum complement levels, and immunoglobin G (IgG) were recorded. Adverse events were recorded. Results: Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were similar between the two groups. More patients in the belimumab group achieved a reduction of ≥4 points in SELENA-SLEDAI at weeks 12 and 24 (week 12, 77.4% vs. 41.4%, p=0.008; week 24, 87.1% vs. 48.3%, p=0.002). The mean score of SELENA-SLEDAI was significantly lower in the belimumab group compared to the standard therapy group at week 12. However, a significant difference was not reached at week 24. Moreover, mean levels of serum C3 and C4 in the belimumab group were significantly higher than those in the standard therapy group at weeks 12 and 24. A higher proportion of patients in the belimumab group had a normal C3 level than in the standard therapy group. In addition, belimumab treatment resulted in a significant decrease in IgG levels at both weeks 12 and 24. At week 24, the belimumab group had a higher reduction in prednisone dose than the standard therapy group. Furthermore, the percentages of patients with more than 50% reduction in prednisone over baseline were significantly greater for belimumab versus standard therapy at week 12 (p=0.002). The occurrence of adverse events was similar between the two groups (standard therapy group, 44.8%; belimumab group, 51.6%). Conclusion: Intravenous belimumab was well tolerated and significantly improved disease activity in Chinese patients with SLE at the early stage of treatment. More importantly, belimumab treatment could result in a rapid reduction in prednisone dose as early as week 12.

16.
Rheumatol Ther ; 11(4): 947-962, 2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38847995

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) have variable treatment pathways, including antimalarials, glucocorticoids, immunosuppressants, and/or biologics. This study describes differences in clinical outcomes when initiating belimumab (BEL) before and after immunosuppressant use. METHODS: This real-world, retrospective cohort study (GSK Study 217536) used de-identified administrative claims data from January 2015 to December 2022 in the Komodo Health Database. Adults with moderate/severe SLE initiating BEL (index date) were identified from January 2017 to May 2022, allowing a ≥ 24-month baseline period. Patients were stratified into those initiating BEL before immunosuppressant use (no immunosuppressant use within 24 months before index) and those initiating BEL after immunosuppressant use (one immunosuppressant used within 24 months before index). Oral glucocorticoid (OGC) use, SLE flares, new organ damage, and all-cause healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) were analyzed descriptively over a 24-month follow-up. RESULTS: Baseline SLE severity was similar for patients initiating BEL before (n = 2295) versus after (n = 4114) immunosuppressant use (moderate, 83.1% vs 79.0%; severe, 16.8% vs 21.0%). Patients initiating BEL before versus after immunosuppressant use had lower SLE flare rates and OGC use. Post-index, patients initiating BEL before versus after immunosuppressant use discontinued their OGC sooner (moderate baseline SLE, 4.5 vs 8.9 months; severe baseline SLE, 6.2 vs 11.6 months). Patients initiating BEL before versus after immunosuppressant use had lower SLE flare rates per person-year at all time points (especially severe flare rates in patients with severe baseline SLE, 0.70 vs 1.48 through 24 months post-index). Median time to new organ damage occurrence was longer in patients initiating BEL before versus after immunosuppressant use (moderate baseline SLE, 32.1 vs 26.7 months; severe baseline SLE, 22.7 vs 21.6 months). All-cause HCRU was similar between cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that patients initiating BEL before versus after immunosuppressant use had more favorable outcomes.

17.
Lupus ; 33(9): 1017-1021, 2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38860334

ABSTRACT

Pyogenic granuloma (PG) is a benign vascular neoformation, presenting as a painful red nodule on the skin, mucosa or nail apparatus. It is usually related to local complications such as bleedings and superinfections. The etiology of PG remains still unclear, and several triggers can lead to its formation. In case of multiple lesions, systemic conditions and drugs remain the main causes. Antineoplastic treatments, retinoids, antiretrovirals, hormones and anticonvulsants are frequently implicated in PG formation. In literature, PG has been rarely described in the course of biological treatment due to rheumatological disease. The present case report describes the development of polydactolous PGs in a 21-year-old woman with juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus (jSLE) during treatment with belimumab, a monoclonal antibody directed against BlyS. The clinical presentation, in particular the timing and the multiplicity of the lesions, and the improvement after belimumab discontinuation allowed us to consider PG as drug-induced. This case highlights the importance of considering PG as a potential complication of rheumatologic treatments.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Granuloma, Pyogenic , Immunosuppressive Agents , Humans , Female , Granuloma, Pyogenic/chemically induced , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/adverse effects , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Young Adult , Immunosuppressive Agents/adverse effects , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/drug therapy , Nail Diseases/chemically induced , Nail Diseases/drug therapy
18.
Clin Rheumatol ; 43(8): 2513-2520, 2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38877375

ABSTRACT

This study is asked to investigate the effects of belimumab on the lipid profile in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients. Forty-one SLE patients who received at least 6 months of belimumab treatment were retrospectively analyzed. The control group consisted of 56 age- and sex-matched lupus patients not treated with belimumab. The changes in lipid profile after a 6-month treatment were compared between the two groups. Generalized estimating equation (GEE) analyses were performed to examine lipid levels longitudinally during the period and the effect of clinical response variables and medication on the lipid profile in the belimumab group. In the belimumab group, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels increased significantly after the 6-month treatment (P = 0.02). After 1 month, HDL, apolipoprotein A-I (apoA-I) significantly increased by 13.8 and 11.4%, compared with baseline, respectively. After 3 months, HDL and apoA-I increased by 9.0 and 7.1%, respectively. After 6 months, HDL increased by 7.6% compared with baseline. Total cholesterol, triglycerides, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and apolipoprotein B did not change significantly over the course of treatment. GEE analyses indicated a significant association between HDL and disease activity indexes, such as IgG, anti-dsDNA, and complement C3. Subgroup analysis revealed significant changes in HDL only in patients who had achieved a ≥ 4-point reduction in SLEDAI-2 K after 6 months of belimumab treatment. Belimumab treatment may result in a long-term increase in HDL level in SLE patients by improving control of lupus activity. This might have beneficial effects on controlling cardiovascular risk in lupus patients. Key Points • Treatment with belimumab resulted in a significant and sustained increase in the HDL levels in SLE patients. • Significant changes in HDL were observed in lupus patients treated with belimumab who had a better clinical response.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Cholesterol, HDL , Immunosuppressive Agents , Lipids , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic , Humans , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/drug therapy , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/blood , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Female , Adult , Male , Retrospective Studies , Middle Aged , Cholesterol, HDL/blood , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Lipids/blood , Apolipoprotein A-I/blood , Triglycerides/blood , Treatment Outcome , Cholesterol, LDL/blood
19.
Eur J Pediatr ; 183(9): 3987-3995, 2024 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38940925

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of belimumab combined with the standard regimen in treating children with active lupus nephritis. This single-center, retrospective cohort study used clinical data of children with newly active lupus nephritis hospitalized in the Department of Nephrology between December 2004 and February 2023. Patients were divided into a belimumab or traditional treatment group according to whether or not they received belimumab. Renal remission and recurrence rates and glucocorticoid dose were compared between groups. Forty-seven children (median age 11 years) were enrolled, including 30 and 17 children in the traditional treatment and belimumab groups, respectively. The Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index-2000 (SLEDAI-2000) score of children in the belimumab group (23.59 ± 7.78) was higher than that in the traditional treatment group (19.13 ± 6.10) (P = 0.035). The two groups showed no significant difference in the frequency of pyuria, gross hematuria, and the levels of 24-h proteinuria and estimated glomerular filtration rate. The complement C3/C4 in the belimumab group recovered faster than that in the traditional treatment group (P < 0.05). There were no between-group differences in the complete renal remission rate at 6 or 12 months (P = 0.442, P = 0.759). There were no between-group differences in 1-year recurrence rate (P = 0.303). Furthermore, 6 and 12 months after treatment, glucocorticoid doses were lower in the belimumab than the traditional treatment group (17.87 ± 6.96 mg/d vs. 27.33 ± 8.40 mg/d, P = 0.000; 10.00 (5.3) mg/d vs. 13.75 (10.0) mg/d, P = 0.007), respectively. CONCLUSION: With an equivalent renal remission rate, belimumab combined with the standard traditional regimen might promote the tapering of glucocorticoids, and the incidence of adverse events is low. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Belimumab is documented as an adjunctive treatment with systemic lupus erythematosus (c-SLE) LN with efficacy. • Due to the paucity of studies, its effects and side effects in children with LN remain unclear. WHAT IS NEW: • This single-center, retrospective cohort study evaluated the efficacy and safety of belimumab combined with the standard regimen in treating children with proliferative LN. • Belimumab combined with the standard traditional treatment might promote the tapering of glucocorticoids, while exhibiting a low occurrence of adverse events.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Drug Therapy, Combination , Glucocorticoids , Immunosuppressive Agents , Lupus Nephritis , Humans , Lupus Nephritis/drug therapy , Female , Retrospective Studies , Child , Male , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/adverse effects , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/administration & dosage , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Immunosuppressive Agents/adverse effects , Immunosuppressive Agents/administration & dosage , Glucocorticoids/therapeutic use , Glucocorticoids/administration & dosage , Glucocorticoids/adverse effects , Adolescent , Treatment Outcome , Remission Induction/methods , Recurrence
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL