Pharmacotherapeutic options for the treatment of hypertension in pregnancy.

INTRODUCTION: Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy affect approximately one in 10 pregnancies and are associated with increased risk of adverse fetal, neonatal and maternal outcomes. There is strong evidence that effective treatment of hypertension (blood pressure ≥ 140/90 mmHg), and enhanced monitoring throughout pregnancy reduces these risks. AREAS COVERED: This article provides a contemporaneous review of treatment of hypertension in pregnancy with antihypertensive agents. We completed a systematic search and review of all meta-analyses and systematic reviews of studies comparing antihypertensives for treatment of pregnancy hypertension in the last five years. We provide a clinically focused summary of when to treat hypertension in pregnancy and which antihypertensive agents can be offered. Special scenarios reviewed include treatment-resistant hypertension and pre-pregnancy antihypertensive optimization. EXPERT OPINION: Several antihypertensives are considered safe and are known to be effective for treatment of hypertension in pregnancy. Given the current uncertainty as to which antihypertensive(s) are superior for treatment of hypertension in pregnancy, women should be counselled and offered a range of antihypertensive options in keeping with evidence on clinical effectiveness, local context and availability of antihypertensive(s), potential side effect profile, and women's preference. Further research is required to help guide clinical decision making, and move toward personalized treatment.

Effect of Beta-Blocker Consumption on the Severity and Extension of Perfusion Defects in Dipyridamole Myocardial Perfusion Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography.

Background Regarding the less-known effects of beta-blocker consumption on the diagnostic value of the myocardial perfusion scan with dipyridamole stress in coronary artery disease (CAD), we aimed to compare the findings of the scans done on the beta-blocker consumption course and after discontinuation of this medications. Materials and Methods Thirty patients with probably CAD and abnormal myocardial perfusion scans (presence of reversible defect), who had been treated with beta-blockers for at least 3 months, were studied. Dipyridamole stress phase of myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) was performed two times with an interval of about 1 week, once after discontinuation of all antianginal and anti-ischemic medications, statins, and beta-blockers for 72 hours prior to the study, and again after discontinuation of all these medications except for beta-blockers. Imaging was done with the same protocol, radiopharmaceutical dose, and imaging parameters. Summed stress score (SSS), summed stress rest, and summed difference scores (SDS), total perfusion deficit (TPD), severity, and extension of myocardial perfusion defects in three coronary artery territories were analyzed, using quantitative perfusion SPECT software. Results Most variables such as SSS, SDS, TPD, severity, and extension of defects showed a significant difference between the two conditions including beta-blocker consumption and after discontinuing beta-blocker consumption before stress imaging ( p < 0.05). Moreover, in patients on treatment with metoprolol, all studied factors including SSS, SDS, TPD, severity, and extension of perfusion defects were significantly reduced when patients consumed beta-blockers before SPECT evaluation ( p < 0.05). Conclusion Beta-blocker consumption can lead to a decrease in the severity and extent of myocardial perfusion defects and therefore probably a decrease in the sensitivity of myocardial scans. Discontinuation of beta-blocker prior to the dipyridamole myocardial perfusion scan can improve diagnostic accuracy.

The causal relationship between antihypertensive drugs and depression: a Mendelian randomization study of drug targets.

Background: Depression ranks as a leading contributor to the global disease burden. The potential causal relationship between the use of antihypertensive medications and depression has garnered significant interest. Despite extensive investigation, the nature of this relationship remains a subject of ongoing debate. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the influence of antihypertensive medications on depression by conducting a Mendelian randomization study focused on drug targets. Method: We focused on the targets of five antihypertensive drug categories: ACE Inhibitors (ACEIs), Angiotensin II Receptor Antagonists (ARBs), Calcium Channel Blockers (CCBs), Beta-Blockers (BBs), and Thiazide Diuretics (TDs). We collected single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with these drug targets from genome-wide association study (GWAS) statistics, using them as proxies for the drugs. Subsequently, we conducted a Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis targeting these drugs to explore their potential impact on depression. Results: Our findings revealed that genetic proxies for Beta-Blockers (BBs) were associated with an elevated risk of depression (OR [95%CI] = 1.027 [1.013, 1.040], p < 0.001). Similarly, genetic proxies for Calcium Channel Blockers (CCBs) were linked to an increased risk of depression (OR [95%CI] = 1.030 [1.009, 1.051], p = 0.006). No significant associations were identified between the genetic markers of other antihypertensive medications and depression risk. Conclusion: The study suggests that genetic proxies associated with Beta-Blockers (BBs) and Calcium Channel Blockers (CCBs) could potentially elevate the risk of depression among patients. These findings underscore the importance of considering genetic predispositions when prescribing these medications, offering a strategic approach to preventing depression in susceptible individuals.

Effect of acute intravenous beta-blocker administration on myocardial blood flow during same-day hybrid CCTA/PET imaging.

This study aimed to evaluate the impact of acute intravenous beta-blocker administration on myocardial blood flow (MBF) during same-day hybrid coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) and 13N-ammonia positron emission tomography (PET) myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI). Previous research on the discontinuation of oral beta-blockers before MPI has shown mixed results, with no studies yet exploring the acute intravenous administration in the context of same-day hybrid imaging. This retrospective study included patients with suspected chronic coronary syndromes undergoing same-day hybrid CCTA/13N-ammonia PET MPI. Exclusion criteria comprised coronary artery stenosis ≥ 50% or regional perfusion abnormalities on PET, and baseline oral beta-blocker medication. Intravenous metoprolol (up to 30 mg) was administered as needed for heart rate control before CCTA. MBF measurements were obtained at rest (rMBF) and during stress (sMBF), and myocardial flow reserve (MFR) was calculated. After excluding 281 patients, 154 were eligible for propensity-score matching, resulting in 108 patients divided into two equal groups based on beta-blocker administration. The groups showed no significant differences in baseline characteristics. Among those who received beta-blockers, there was a significant decrease in sMBF (2.21 [IQR 1.72-2.78] versus 2.46 [2.08-2.99] ml∙min-1∙g-1, p = 0.027) and MFR (3.46 [2.70-4.05] versus 3.79 [3.22-4.46], p = 0.030), respectively, compared to those who did not receive beta-blockers. In contrast, rMBF remained unaffected (0.65 [0.54-0.78] versus 0.64 [0.55-0.76] ml∙min-1∙g-1, p = 0.931). Acute intravenous beta-blocker administration significantly impacts MBF, leading to a slight reduction in sMBF and MFR. In contrast, rMBF appears unaffected, suggesting that beta-blockers primarily affect the coronary capacity to respond to vasodilators.

Mortality in septic patients treated with esmolol or landiolol: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials with trial sequential analysis.

BACKGROUND: The latest meta-analysis indicated potential survival benefits from ultra-short-acting ß-blockers in septic patients with persistent tachycardia. However, subsequent multicenter randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have reported conflicting findings, prompting the need for an updated meta-analysis to incorporate these newly published RCTs. RESEARCH QUESTION: Does the use of ultra-short-acting ß-blockers (esmolol or landiolol) in septic patients with persistent tachycardia improve mortality? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We conducted an updated systematic search till April 2nd, 2024 exploring MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Embase for RCTs reporting mortality in adult septic patients treated with esmolol or landiolol as compared to none or placebo, and published in English. Meta-analyses were conducted with the random effect model. The primary outcome was mortality at the longest follow-up, with subgroup analysis separating single from large multicenter RCTs. RESULTS: Eight RCTs (885 patients) were included in the primary analysis. Ultra-short acting ß-blockers did not significantly improve mortality at the longest follow-up (risk ratio [RR] 0.84; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.68-1.02; p=0.08, I2=51%, very low certainty of the evidence) and 28-day mortality (RR 0.77; 95%CI 0.59-1.00; p=0.05; I2=62%). Subgroup analyses of mortality outcomes pointed towards different results between single-center and multicenter RCTs. Trial sequence analyses (TSAs) showed that both mortality outcomes were not robust. The sensitivity analyses suggested a significant reduction in mortality by adding RCTs published in non-English language. INTERPRETATION: In this updated meta-analysis, the use of esmolol or landiolol did not reduce mortality in septic patients with persistent tachycardia. However, results were not robust and outcomes differed between single-center and multicenter RCTs. Moreover, sensitivity analyses showed the fragility of the primary outcome. Further studies regarding ultra-short-acting ß-blockers with advanced cardiac monitoring or serial echocardiography are warranted. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: The protocol was preventively registered in the PROSPERO database on the 31th January 2024 (Registration number: CRD: 42024503570).

Efficacy of Beta-Blockers and Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors in Non-Ischemic Dilated Cardiomyopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: Non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (NIDCM) is a form of heart failure with a poor prognosis and unclear optimal management. The aim of the study was to systematically review the literature and assess the efficacy and safety of beta-blockers and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors in the management of chronic heart failure secondary to NIDCM and explore their putative mechanisms of action. Methods: Studies from 1990 to 2023 were reviewed using PubMed and EMBASE, focusing on their effects on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in NIDCM patients, according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Results: Beta-blockers showed a significant beneficial effect on LVEF improvement in NIDCM, with an overall effect size of Cohen's d = 1.30, 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.76, 1.84), high heterogeneity (Tau2 = 0.90; Chi2 = 162.05, df = 13, P < 0.00001; I2 = 92%), and a significant overall effect (Z = 4.72, P < 0.00001). ACE inhibitors also showed a beneficial role, but with less heterogeneity (Tau2 = 0.02; Chi2 = 1.09, df = 1, P = 0.30; I2 = 8%) and a nonsignificant overall effect (Z = 1.36, P = 0.17), 95% CI (-0.24, 1.31). Conclusions: The study highlights the efficacy of carvedilol in improving LVEF in NIDCM patients over ACE inhibitors, recommends beta-blockers as first-line therapy, and advocates further research on ACE inhibitors.

Sequencing Quadruple Therapy for Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction: Does It Really Matter?

The conventional sequence of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) initiation in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) assumes that the effectiveness and tolerability of GDMT agents mirror their order of discovery, which is not true. In this review, the authors discuss flexible GDMT sequencing that should be permitted in special populations, such as patients with bradycardia, chronic kidney disease, or atrial fibrillation. Moreover, the initiation of certain GDMT medications may enable tolerance of other GDMT medications. Most importantly, the achievement of partial doses of all four pillars of GDMT is better than achievement of target dosing of only a couple.

ß-BLOCKERS LOWER FIRST DECOMPENSATION IN PATIENTS WITH CIRRHOSIS AND ENDURING PORTAL HYPERTENSION AFTER ETIOLOGICAL TREATMENT.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Non-selective beta-blockers (NSBB) can lower the risk of first decompensation in patients with cirrhosis and clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) (identified by a hepatic venous pressure gradient ≥10 mmHg) with active etiology. Our aim was to examine the effect of NSBB on first decompensation occurrence in patients with cirrhosis and enduring CSPH after etiological treatment. METHODS: Patients with compensated cirrhosis and clinical evidence of CSPH (gastroesophageal varices -GEV- and/or spontaneous portosystemic collaterals- SPSS) after two years from etiological treatment. Primary endpoint was first decompensation (occurrence of variceal bleeding, ascites, or hepatic encephalopathy) in patients on-NSBB vs. off-NSBB. RESULTS: Final cohort included 406 patients. Baseline characteristics of patients on-NSBB (n=187) and off-NSBB (n=219) were comparable, except for signs of PH that were more pronounced in the on-NSBB group. During a mean follow-up of 32 months, 127 (31%) patients decompensated, with ascites being the most common (77%) decompensating event. Decompensation rates were lower in patients on-NSBB (16% vs 44%, p<0,0001). The benefit of NSBB on decompensation was maintained in patients with small GEV (17% vs 43%, p<0,0001), in those with SPSS only (8% vs 43%, p=0,003) and in each different etiology, including HCV-cured cirrhosis (9% vs 32%, p<0,0001). At Cox regression analysis, Hemoglobin, Child-Pugh, MELD-Na, diabetes at baseline and previous bacterial infections were independent predictors of decompensation, while NSBB-use had a protective effect (HR 0,32, 95% CI 0,20-0,49; p<0,0001). NSBB-use significantly reduced bacterial infection rates (HR 0,36, 95% CI 0,22-0,58; p<0,0001). CONCLUSION: NSBB decrease the risk of first decompensation in patients with cirrhosis and enduring CSPH after etiological treatment.

Beta-Blockers as an Immunologic and Autonomic Manipulator in Critically Ill Patients: A Review of the Recent Literature.

The autonomic nervous system plays a key role in maintaining body hemostasis through both the sympathetic and parasympathetic nervous systems. Sympathetic overstimulation as a reflex to multiple pathologies, such as septic shock, brain injury, cardiogenic shock, and cardiac arrest, could be harmful and lead to autonomic and immunologic dysfunction. The continuous stimulation of the beta receptors on immune cells has an inhibitory effect on these cells and may lead to immunologic dysfunction through enhancing the production of anti-inflammatory cytokines, such as interleukin-10 (IL-10), and inhibiting the production of pro-inflammatory factors, such as interleukin-1B IL-1B and tissue necrotizing factor-alpha (TNF-alpha). Sympathetic overstimulation-induced autonomic dysfunction may also happen due to adrenergic receptor insensitivity or downregulation. Administering anti-adrenergic medication, such as beta-blockers, is a promising treatment to compensate against the undesired effects of adrenergic surge. Despite many misconceptions about beta-blockers, beta-blockers have shown a promising effect in decreasing mortality in patients with critical illness. In this review, we summarize the recently published articles that have discussed using beta-blockers as a promising treatment to decrease mortality in critically ill patients, such as patients with septic shock, traumatic brain injury, cardiogenic shock, acute decompensated heart failure, and electrical storm. We also discuss the potential pathophysiology of beta-blockers in various types of critical illness. More clinical trials are encouraged to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of beta-blockers in improving mortality among critically ill patients.

Methylprednisolone induced morning lymphocytosis: A prospective study in patients with immune mediated inflammatory disorders.

INTRODUCTION: Contrasting with the lymphopenia classically reported after administration of glucocorticoids, a lymphocytosis has been sometimes observed in patients after glucocorticoid administration. We here determine prospectively the timing and magnitude of methylprednisolone (mPDN)-induced lymphocytosis and study the effects of concomitant propranolol administration on lymphocyte count (Ly). METHODS: Ly was measured before and 24 to 72hours after initiating mPDN treatment in 20 patients with immune-mediated inflammatory disorders (IMID). After one week, patients with increased Ly were divided in two groups receiving, in addition to mPDN, either propranolol or a placebo; Ly was determined 4 days later. Lymphocyte subpopulations and mPDN plasma levels were determined in subsets of the patients. Values are expressed as median with 25%-75% interquartile range. RESULTS: A 73.4% (37-305) increase of Ly was observed in 18/20 patients as soon as 48 (48-72) hours after initiating mPDN (32mg; 16-32). Lymphocytosis (Ly≥4000/µL) was observed in 7 patients and hyperlymphocytosis (Ly≥5000/µL) in 4 of them. The increase in Ly was noted both for B and T cells. Median mPDN plasma levels (n=13) were 97.4ng/mL (IQR 67-489) and 3.2 (IQR 2.1-5.1) respectively 8hours and 24hours after oral mPDN administration. No significant change in Ly was shown under propranolol (p=0.570). CONCLUSION: A morning lymphocytosis observed during mPDN treatment occurs in the very first days of mPDN administration. Our results do not support the hypothesis of an increased adrenergic tone responsible for this phenomenon. Identifying this unexpected etiology of lymphocytosis could mitigate the need for unnecessary supplementary investigations in clinical practice.

Pharmacological management of heart failure in adults with congenital heart disease.

Congenital heart disease (CHD) is the most common global congenital defect affecting over 2.4 million individuals in the United States. Ongoing medical and surgical advancements have improved the survival of children with CHD leading to a shift where, as of 2010, adults constitute two-thirds of the CHD patient population. The increasing number and aging of adult congenital heart disease (ACHD) patients present a clinical challenge due to heightened complexity, morbidity, and mortality. Studies indicate that 1 in 13 ACHD patients will develop heart failure (HF) in their lifetime. ACHD-HF patients experience more frequent emergency department visits, higher hospitalization rates, longer hospital stays, and higher mortality compared to non-ACHD patients with heart failure (non-ACHD-HF). Despite HF being the leading cause of death in ACHD patients, there is a notable gap in evidence regarding treatment. While guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) has been extensively studied in non-ACHD-HF, research specific to ACHD-HF individuals is limited. This article aims to comprehensively review available literature addressing the pharmacological treatment of ACHD-HF.

Management of liver disease and portal hypertension in cystic fibrosis: a review.

INTRODUCTION: Cystic fibrosis (CF)-associated liver disease can significantly affect the quality of life and survival of people with CF. The hepatobiliary manifestations in CF are various, with focal/multilobular biliary cirrhosis more common in children and porto-sinusoidal vascular disease (PSVD) in young adults. Portal hypertensive complications, particularly bleeding from esophagogastric varices and hypersplenism are common, while liver failure is rarer and mainly linked to biliary disease. AREAS COVERED: This review explores current therapeutic options for CF-associated liver disease, presenting ongoing studies and new insights into parthenogenesis for potential future therapies. EXPERT OPINION: Monitoring for signs of portal hypertension is essential. Limited evidence supports ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) efficacy in halting CF liver disease progression. The effect of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulators on liver outcomes lacks definitive data, since patients with CF-related liver disease were excluded from trials due to potential hepatotoxicity. A proposed approach involves using UDCA and modulators in early stages, along with anti-inflammatory agents, with further therapeutic strategies awaiting randomized trials. Prevention of portal hypertensive bleeding includes endoscopic sclerotherapy or ligation of esophageal varices. Nonselective beta-blockers may also prevent bleeding and could be cautiously implemented. Other non-etiological treatments require investigation.

Carvedilol to prevent hepatic decompensation of cirrhosis in patients with clinically significant portal hypertension stratified by new non-invasive model (CHESS2306).

Background & Aims: Non-invasive models stratifying clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) are limited. Herein, we developed a new non-invasive model for predicting CSPH in patients with compensated cirrhosis and investigated whether carvedilol can prevent hepatic decompensation in patients with high-risk CSPH stratified using the new model. Methods: Non-invasive risk factors of CSPH were identified via systematic review and meta-analysis of studies involving patients with hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG). A new non-invasive model was validated for various performance aspects in three cohorts, i.e., a multicenter HVPG cohort, a follow-up cohort, and a carvedilol-treating cohort. Results: In the meta-analysis with six studies (n = 819), liver stiffness measurement and platelet count were identified as independent risk factors for CSPH and were used to develop the new "CSPH risk" model. In the HVPG cohort (n = 151), the new model accurately predicted CSPH with cutoff values of 0 and -0.68 for ruling in and out CSPH, respectively. In the follow-up cohort (n = 1,102), the cumulative incidences of decompensation events significantly differed using the cutoff values of <-0.68 (low-risk), -0.68 to 0 (medium-risk), and >0 (high-risk). In the carvedilol-treated cohort, patients with high-risk CSPH treated with carvedilol (n = 81) had lower rates of decompensation events than non-selective beta-blockers untreated patients with high-risk CSPH (n = 613 before propensity score matching [PSM], n = 162 after PSM). Conclusions: Treatment with carvedilol significantly reduces the risk of hepatic decompensation in patients with high-risk CSPH stratified by the new model.

Management of Long QT Syndrome: A Systematic Review.

Long QT syndrome (LQTS) is a cardiac disorder characterized by prolonged repolarization of the heart's electrical cycle, which can be observed as an extended QT interval on an electrocardiogram (ECG). The safe and effective management of LQTS often necessitates a multifaceted approach encompassing pharmacological treatment, lifestyle modifications, and, in high-risk cases, the implantation of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs). Beta-blockers, particularly nadolol and propranolol, are foundational in treating LQTS, especially for high-risk patients, though ICDs are recommended for those with a history of cardiac arrest or recurrent arrhythmic episodes. Intermediate and low-risk patients are usually managed with medical therapy and regular monitoring. Lifestyle modifications, such as avoiding strenuous physical activities and certain medications, play a critical role. Additionally, psychological support is essential due to the anxiety and depression associated with LQTS. Left cardiac sympathetic denervation (LCSD) offers an alternative for those intolerant to beta-blockers or ICDs. For diagnosis and management, advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) are proving beneficial, enhancing early detection and risk stratification. Despite these developments, significant gaps in understanding the pathophysiology and optimal management strategies for LQTS remain. Future research should focus on refining risk stratification, developing new therapeutic approaches, and generating robust data to guide treatment decisions, ultimately aiming for a personalized medicine approach.

Early Implant Failure in Patients Using Antihypertensive Medications: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

INTRODUCTION AND AIMS: Antihypertensive medications increase osteoblasts differentiation and bone mineral formation. Osseointegration of dental implants depends on new bone formation and remodelling. Consequently, improved osseointegration may be speculated in patients receiving antihypertensive drugs. Aim - Asses the effect of antihypertensive medications on osseointegration of dental implants. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study. All individuals (792) who received at least one dental implant during a 6-year period at a single medical centre. The cohort was divided into three groups: normotensive (74.8% - 593) patients (NT group), hypertensive (23.4% - 185) patients using antihypertensive medications (HTN +med group), and hypertensive patients not using (1.8% - 14) antihypertensive medications (HTN -med group). Interventions-Installation of dental implants by experienced oral and maxillofacial surgeons with or without bone augmentation. Main measures - Early implant failure (EIF) (≤12 months from loading) reflects lack of new bone formation or excessive bone turnover during osseointegration. RESULTS: The study included 792 individuals, 14 in the HTN-med group, 185 in the HTN +med group and 593 in the NT group. At the patient level, the HTN -med group were most likely (P = .041) to experience EIF 28.60% (4/14 patients). Due to the small sample of the HTN -med group, an additional analysis was carried out excluding this group. EIF of 9.70% (18/185 patients) in the HTN +med group was significantly (P = .047) lower than the NT group 14.50% (86/593 patients). 2971 implants were inserted in all study groups, 71.4% (2123) in the NT group, 26.4% (784) in the HTN +med group and 2.2% (64) in the HTN -med group. Collectively, EIF was recorded for 114 (3.84%) implants. In the HTN -med group, EIF of 6.25% (4 implants), was significantly (P < .001) higher than the two other groups. The EIF rate of the HTN +med group was 2.29% (18 implants) which was significantly less than that of the NT group 4.33% (92 implants). Controlling modifying parameters, using antihypertensive medication yielded lower EIF with marginal significance (P = .059) and OR = 0.618. CONCLUSION: Based on statistically significant lower EIF rate found in the HTN +med group, antihypertensive medications may decrease the EIF rate of dental implants. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Clinicians should be encouraged to treat hypertensive patients with implant-supported prostheses, provided patient compliance regarding medications intake is good.

Beta-blocker initiation under dobutamine infusion in acute advanced heart failure: a target trial emulation with observational data.

Aims: In patients with advanced heart failure requiring dobutamine infusion, it is usually recommended to initiate beta-blockers after weaning from dobutamine. However, beta-blockers are sometimes initiated under dobutamine infusion in a real-world scenario. The association between such early beta-blocker initiation with clinical outcomes is unknown. Therefore, this study investigates the association between initiating beta-blockers under dobutamine infusion and survival outcomes. Methods and results: This observational study with a multicentre inpatient-care database emulated a pragmatic randomized controlled trial (RCT) of the beta-blocker initiation strategy. First, 1151 patients on dobutamine and not on beta-blockers on the day of heart failure admission (Day 0) were identified. Among 1095 who met eligibility criteria, patients who were eventually initiated beta-blockers under dobutamine infusion by Day 7 (early initiation strategy) were 1:1 matched to those who were not initiated (conservative strategy). The methods of cloning, censoring, and weighting were applied to emulate the target trial. Patients were followed up for up to 30 days. The primary outcome was all-cause death. Among 780 matched patients (median age, 81 years), the adjusted hazard ratio was 1.11 (95% confidence interval 0.75-1.64, P = 0.59) for the early initiation strategy. The estimated 30-day all-cause mortalities in the early initiation strategy and the conservative strategy were 19.3% (10.6-30.7) and 16.2% (9.2-25.3), respectively. The results were consistent when we used different days to determine strategies (i.e. 5 and 9) instead of 7 days. Conclusion: The present observational study emulating a pragmatic RCT found no positive or negative association between beta-blocker initiation under dobutamine infusion and overall survival.

Prognostic impact of beta-blocker use by N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide level in acute heart failure patients.

AIMS: Both patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and those with HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) present with elevated N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and have multiple comorbidities; consequently, the prognostic effect of NT-proBNP according to beta-blocker (BB) use is unknown. METHODS: This retrospective study evaluated patients admitted for acute HF between January 2012 and December 2017 at Ulsan University Hospital. Clinical, echocardiographic, laboratory and drug prescription data, including BB data, were collected from the hospital database. Information on mortality was collected by reviewing medical records or using national death data. RESULTS: Of the 472 patients evaluated, 216 (45.8%) and 256 (54.2%) patients were and were not prescribed BB at discharge, respectively. A total of 224 (47.5%) patients died within a median follow-up duration of 44 months. The Kaplan-Meier analysis showed reduced all-cause mortality with BB in HFrEF (ejection fraction ≤ 40%) but not in HFpEF (ejection fraction > 40%). In the multivariate Cox regression analysis, transmitral to tissue Doppler imaging, early diastolic velocity ratio (E/E'), NT-proBNP and BB use were independent predictors of all-cause mortality in HFrEF. Meanwhile, haemoglobin and NT-proBNP levels were independent predictors of HFpEF. The NT-proBNP cut-off value for determining all-cause mortality was set to 4800 pg/mL. Among HFrEF patients with NT-proBNP < 4800 pg/mL, the survival rate was higher for patients with BB use than those with no BB use (log-rank P < 0.001). However, in the HFpEF group, the survival rate associated with BB use did not differ according to the NT-proBNP levels. Both HFrEF and HFpEF patients with NT-proBNP levels of ≥4800 pg/mL presented with multiple comorbidities, including lower body mass index and haemoglobin levels and higher creatinine levels, NT-proBNP levels and E/E'. CONCLUSION: In patients with acute HF, BB use is associated with reduced all-cause mortality in those with HFrEF but not in those with HFpEF. HFrEF patients with NT-proBNP levels of <4800 pg/mL treated with BB have a higher survival rate than those not treated with BB. However, this benefit is not seen in HFrEF patients with NT-proBNP levels of ≥4800 pg/mL or in all HFpEF patients, regardless of the NT-proBNP level. NT-proBNP levels are elevated in multiple comorbid conditions, and these comorbidities may contribute to the attenuated effects of BB on all-cause mortality.

The multifaceted role of beta-blockers in overcoming cancer progression and drug resistance: Extending beyond cardiovascular disorders.

Beta-blockers are commonly used medications that antagonize ß-adrenoceptors, reducing sympathetic nervous system activity. Emerging evidence suggests that beta-blockers may also have anticancer effects and help overcome drug resistance in cancer treatment. This review summarizes the contribution of different isoforms of beta-adrenoceptors in cancer progression, the current preclinical and clinical data on associations between beta-blockers use and cancer outcomes, as well as their ability to enhance responses to chemotherapy and other standard therapies. We discuss proposed mechanisms, including effects on angiogenesis, metastasis, cancer stem cells, and apoptotic pathways. Overall, results from epidemiological studies and small clinical trials largely indicate the beneficial effects of beta-blockers on cancer progression and drug resistance. However, larger randomized controlled trials are needed to firmly establish their clinical efficacy and optimal utilization as adjuvant agents in cancer therapy.