External cephalic version: a retrospective chart review at a Canadian tertiary care centre.

OBJECTIVES: The primary objective is to identify our local external cephalic version (ECV) success rate, variables associated with increased likelihood of success, and complication rates. The secondary objective is to allow obstetrical care providers to accurately counsel patients undergoing trial of ECV. METHODS: We analyzed patient charts between January 2018 and December 2022 who underwent ECV. Variables included maternal age, parity, gestational age at time of ECV attempt, breech type, anesthetic, uterine relaxant, placental location, neonatal birthweight, and provider seniority. Outcomes were ECV success, mode of delivery, emergent cesarean delivery rate due to ECV, and NICU admission. Appropriate statistical analysis was performed. RESULTS: 258 patients were included. Overall success rate was 31%. Multiparity, transverse presentation, and neonatal birthweight > 3.3 kg were associated with significantly increased success rates. Uterine relaxant use was associated with a lower success rate than no relaxant use, which is potentially explained by significantly more frequent relaxant use in non-transverse presentations and non-significant trend in increased relaxant use in primiparous patients. Other factors including anesthetic use, maternal age, gestational age, placental location, and provider seniority did not significantly impact success. Emergency cesarean delivery rate was 10% and NICU admission rate was 8%, both of which were higher than anticipated. CONCLUSION: ECV remains an option for management of the term breech. Obstetrical providers at our centre and in others may use this study to more accurately counsel patients using local data and optimize likelihood of success based on patient and peri-procedural factors. OBJECTIFS: L'objectif principal est de déterminer le taux local de versions céphaliques externes (VCE) réussies, les variables associées à une grande probabilité de réussite et le taux de complications. L'objectif secondaire est d'outiller les prestataires de soins obstétricaux de sorte qu'ils puissent bien accompagner les patientes se soumettant à un essai de VCE. MÉTHODE: Nous avons analysé les dossiers des patientes s'étant soumises à une VCE dans la période de janvier 2018 à décembre 2022. Les variables analysées étaient l'âge maternel, la parité, l'âge gestationnel au moment de la tentative de VCE, le type de présentation du siège, l'anesthésie, le relaxant utérin, le positionnement du placenta, le poids à la naissance et les années d'expérience du prestataire. Les critères étaient la réussite de la VCE, le mode d'accouchement, le taux de césarienne d'urgence en raison de la VCE et l'admission aux soins intensifs néonataux. Une bonne analyse statistique a été réalisée. RÉSULTATS: Au total, 258 patientes ont été incluses. Le taux de réussite global a été de 31 %. La multiparité, la présentation transverse et le poids de naissance supérieur à 3,3 kg ont été associés à un taux de réussite significativement plus élevé. L'utilisation de relaxants utérins a été associée à un moins bon taux de réussite comparativement à l'absence de relaxant, ce qui peut s'expliquer par l'utilisation significativement plus fréquente de relaxants dans les présentations non transverses et une tendance non significative à l'augmentation du recours aux relaxants chez les primipares. D'autres facteurs, tels que l'utilisation d'anesthésiques, l'âge maternel, l'âge gestationnel, le positionnement du placenta et les années d'expérience du prestataire, n'ont pas eu d'effet significatif sur la réussite de l'intervention. Le taux de césarienne d'urgence était de 10 % et le taux d'admission aux soins intensifs néonataux était de 8 %, tous deux plus élevés que prévu. CONCLUSION: La VCE reste une option pour la prise en charge de la présentation du siège à terme. Les prestataires de soins obstétricaux de notre centre et d'autres centres peuvent utiliser cette étude pour bien accompagner les patientes en utilisant des données locales et optimiser les chances de réussite en fonction des facteurs liés à la patiente et à la période avant, pendant et après l'intervention.

Prediction of intrapartum caesarean section in vaginal breech birth: development of models for nulliparous and multiparous women.

OBJECTIVES: To develop prediction models for intrapartum caesarean section in vaginal breech birth. METHODS: This single-center cohort-study included 262 nulliparous and 230 multiparous women attempting vaginal breech birth. For both groups, we developed and (internally) validated three models for the prediction of intrapartum cesarean section. RESULTS: The prediction model for nulliparous women (AUC: 0.67) included epidural analgesia (aOR 2.14; p=0.01), maternal height (aOR 0.64 per 10 cm; p=0.08), birthweight ≥3.8 kg (aOR 2.45; p=0.03) and an interaction term describing the effect of OC if birthweight is ≥3.8 kg (aOR 0.24; p=0.04). An alternative model for nulliparous women which, instead of birthweight, included fetal abdominal circumference with a cut-off at 34 cm (aOR 1.93; p=0.04), showed similar performance (AUC: 0.68). The prediction model for multiparous women (AUC: 0.77) included prelabor rupture of membranes (aOR 0.31; p=0.03), epidural analgesia (aOR 2.42; p=0.07), maternal BMI (aOR 2.92 per 10 kg/m2; p=0.01) and maternal age (aOR 3.17 per decade; p=0.06). CONCLUSIONS: Our prediction models show the most relevant risk factors associated with intrapartum cesarean section in vaginal breech birth for both nulliparous and multiparous women. Importantly, this study clarifies the role of the OC by showing that this parameter is only associated with intrapartum cesarean section if birthweight is above 3.8 kg (or abdominal circumference is above 34 cm). Conversely, knowing the OC when the birthweight is less than 3.8 kg (or abdominal circumference is less than 34 cm) did not improve prediction of this surgical outcome.

A qualitative and quantitative cross-sectional study on the past, present, and future of vaginal delivery: Turkey.

OBJECTIVE: The current study focused on predicting future trends in obstetrics by examining obstetricians' approaches to specific challenging vaginal delivery that require special experience, such as breech presentation, macrosomic fetus, twin pregnancy, and vacuum use, compared with their residency training experience. METHODS: The cross-sectional study was conducted in two phases. The first phase was qualitative and the second phase was quantitative. The "interview" and "survey" techniques served as data collection tools. In total, 20 obstetricians participated in the interviews, and 400 obstetricians took part in the survey. Data from the interviews were analyzed using the Maxqda 2020 qualitative data analysis program, and survey data were analyzed using SPSS version 25.0. RESULTS: Over the past 2 decades, there has been a gradual shift from vaginal deliveries to cesarean deliveries in cases involving breech presentation, macrosomic fetus, twin pregnancy, and vacuum use. While medicolegal concerns are undeniable, the prevalent belief among obstetricians that cesarean delivery is safer than vaginal delivery significantly influences this trend. Comparatively, young obstetricians often complete their residency training without acquiring sufficient knowledge and skills in vaginal delivery. CONCLUSION: Young obstetricians currently lack adequate experience in managing vaginal deliveries for breech presentation, macrosomic fetus, twin pregnancy, and vacuum use. This experience is at risk of disappearing entirely within the next decade as senior obstetricians retire. Policymakers should take this into consideration when shaping future healthcare policies.

Contraindications in national guidelines for vaginal breech delivery at term: Comparison, consensus, and controversy.

INTRODUCTION: The optimal mode of delivery for vaginal breech presentation remains a clinical dilemma. Planned vaginal delivery offers maternal advantages because it avoids major abdominal surgery and has no consequences for following pregnancies, while elective cesarean delivery proves advantageous for the neonate because adverse outcomes are less frequent. Patient selection for vaginal breech delivery is important based on the individual risk balance. A lack of consensus exists regarding the specific contraindications for vaginal breech delivery, largely due to limited scientific evidence. This systematic review aims to give an overview of contraindications for vaginal breech delivery, as presented in guidelines, analyze relevant literature, and offer evidence-based recommendations for the contraindications stated in the guidelines. MATERIAL AND METHODS: To identify national guidelines PubMed, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, EMBASE, NICE, UpToDate, and ClinicalKey were searched using two keywords: "breech presentation" and "vaginal delivery." We systematically reviewed the literature for existing evidence for contraindications for term vaginal breech delivery. The following databases were searched: PubMed (April 2024), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and EMBASE (1947 to 2024). RESULTS: Our search identified eight guidelines that stated a total of 11 contraindications for vaginal breech delivery. Among these guidelines, agreement was limited, with the sole consensus in all guidelines on the contraindication of footling breech. Our comprehensive literature search yielded 43 articles discussing 14 potential contraindications. We found supportive evidence for 7 of 11 contraindications from the guidelines, with only substantial and satisfactory evidence for two contraindications. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study underscore the lack of consensus among national guidelines regarding contraindications for term vaginal breech delivery. Furthermore, we found a notable lack of substantial scientific evidence to support these contraindications. In light of these findings, we suggest a reduced list of contraindications in vaginal breech deliveries.

Outcomes in term breech birth according to intended mode of delivery-A Swedish prospective single-center experience of a dedicated breech birth team.

INTRODUCTION: The appropriate mode of delivery for breech babies is a topic of ongoing debate. After the publication of the Term Breech Trial in 2000, the proportion of breech babies delivered vaginally in Sweden rapidly dropped to 7% from 26%. In 2015, international guidelines changed to once again recommend offering vaginal breech deliveries in select cases. In 2017, a Swedish hospital established a dedicated Breech Team to provide safe vaginal breech deliveries according to the new guidelines. The aim of this study is to compare neonatal morbidity in the group planned for cesarean breech delivery with the group planned for vaginal breech delivery treated in accordance with the new guidelines. The study adds to the literature by providing insights into the consequences of reintroducing vaginal breech births in a high-resource health-care setting. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective observational study was conducted at Södersjukhuset's maternity ward with 1067 women who gave birth to a single breech fetus at term. Outcomes were compared between the planned vaginal and planned cesarean delivery groups using intention-to-treat analysis and multivariate analysis to control for confounders. RESULTS: Out of the 1067 women, 78.9% were planned for cesarean delivery and 21.1% were planned for vaginal delivery. The planned vaginal group had a significantly greater risk for neonatal morbidity compared to the planned cesarean group (3.1% vs. 0.7%; OR 4.44, 95% CI 1.48-13.34). The risk difference remained significant after controlling for confounders. CONCLUSIONS: Planned vaginal breech delivery was associated with an increased risk of neonatal mortality and short-term morbidity compared to planned cesarean breech delivery in accordance with the new guidelines. The potential risks and benefits of planned vaginal breech delivery should be carefully weighed against those of planned cesarean delivery.

Undiagnosed Uterine Didelphys, Concomitant Right Renal Agenesis, and Left Nephrolithiasis in a Primigravida With Breech Pregnancy: A Case Report.

Mullerian duct anomalies are congenital abnormalities involving the female genital systems. A double uterus or uterine didelphys is one of the uterine duplication anomalies that result from impaired fusion with regard to the Mullerian ducts. The uterine didelphys can be diagnosed earlier in symptomatic patients. However, the diagnosis can be delayed or the patients may remain undiagnosed throughout their lifetime if asymptomatic. Pregnant women with uterine didelphys are at a greater risk for spontaneous miscarriage, malposition, premature labor, and cervical incompetence. Uterine didelphys are also associated with renal anomalies such as renal agenesis or duplex kidneys. We present a case of a 24-year-old primigravida who had a spontaneous pregnancy and underwent a lower segment cesarean section (LSCS) after a failed external cephalic version for the breech fetal position. The uterine didelphys was diagnosed postnatally. Her condition was associated with right renal agenesis and concomitant left renal calculus.

Impact of a simulator-based training program on the success rate of external cephalic version.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the success and complication rates of external cephalic version before and after the implementation of a simulator-based training program at a tertiary care university centre with a dedicated external cephalic version team. STUDY DESIGN: In this single-center intervention study, the success rate and the complication rates of external cephalic version in the two years before the implementation of a simulation-based training program for all specialists and residents, were compared with the two years following the event. T- student, Mann-Whitney, and Chi-square tests were used. All data were extracted from the hospital's electronic patient records. RESULTS: A total of 96 external cephalic versions were performed in the 2 years before the training program, and 74 after the training program. The overall success rates were similar between the two groups: 44.8 % before training and 43.2 % after training (p = 0.824). No major complications occurred, and no emergency cesarean deliveries were performed in either period. CONCLUSION: In a tertiary care university training center with a dedicated team in external cephalic version, a structured simulation-based training program did not impact the success rate or the complication rates of the procedure.

How to: a breech vaginal delivery before 25 weeks of gestation.

Delivery before 25 weeks of gestation has become a more frequent occurrence in our maternity units and can be a difficult obstetrical situation to manage when the fetus is breech. We describe a new obstetrical maneuver enabling vaginal birth of a breech fetus before 25 weeks of gestation. It enables the fetal mobile to be fully grasped and secured, thus facilitating passage through the genital tract.

Neonatal Outcome following External Cephalic Version (ECV)-Comparison between Vaginal Birth after Successful ECV and Elective Caesarean Section after Unsuccessful ECV.

Introduction: In 3-6% of pregnancies, foetuses can be expected to be in a breech presentation near term. Consultation concerning further management of the pregnancy, including the option of an external cephalic version (ECV), is recommended by international guidelines (RCOG, ACOG, and DGGG). With regards to an ECV, there need to be two assumptions. Firstly, the procedure is safe, which has been shown adequately. Secondly, a vaginal birth after a successful ECV needs to prove to be non-inferior to the alternative of an elective caesarean section. The aim of this study is to assess the non-inferiority assumption. Methods: Overall, 142 singleton pregnancies were analysed that presented a foetus in a non-cephalic presentation and underwent an ECV near term between 2011 and 2020. The ECV was performed at 36 weeks of gestation for primiparous women and at 37/38 weeks of gestation for multiparous women. To assess neonatal outcome, the following parameters were recorded: arterial and venous umbilical cord blood pH, APGAR scores and admission to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Data were analysed under the assumption that neonatal outcome does not differ between elective caesarean sections with or without an ECV in advance. Results: The success rate of an ECV was 56.3% (80/142). In the case of a successful ECV, there was a 77.5% (62/80) chance for a vaginal delivery. The mean arterial pH for neonates born vaginally after successful ECV was 7.262 (SD 0.089), compared to 7.316 (SD 0.051) for those born via elective caesarean section (p < 0.001). APGAR scores at 1, 5, and 10 min were similar between the groups, with a slightly higher proportion of neonates scoring below the median in the caesarean section group. Specifically, 13.7% (7/51) at 1 min, 15.7% (8/51) at 5 min, and 9.8% (5/51) at 10 min in the caesarean section group were below the median, compared to 4.92% (3/61), 4.92% (3/61), and 3.28% (2/61) in the vaginal birth group. NICU admission rates were 3.28% for vaginal births and 3.92% for elective caesarean sections (p > 0.05). Conclusions: Women with a successful ECV can expect a neonatal birth outcome after a vaginal birth that is non-inferior to an alternative elective caesarean section.

Impact of a regional simulation-based training course in the implementation of external cephalic version: Intervention study.

OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were to assess whether a regional simulation-based training course in external cephalic version (ECV) would lead to the adoption of this technique in hospitals where it was not previously practiced, and to improve success rates in those already performing it. METHODS: This was an intervention study where two specialists in obstetrics and gynecology from 10 Portuguese public maternity hospitals attended a structured simulation-based training in ECV. Hospitals were categorized based on whether ECV was conducted prior to the training program, and on their annual number of deliveries. Main outcomes were the number of ECVs performed in the 2 years before and after the course, and their success rates. RESULTS: Implementation of ECV was achieved in four additional hospitals during the 2 years following the course. Among the three hospitals already performing ECV and able to report their data, no significant differences in success rates were observed in the 2 years following the course (45.6% vs. 47.9%, P = 0.797). After a successful ECV, 77.7% of women had a vaginal delivery. CONCLUSION: A regional simulation-based training course in ECV led to an increase in the number of hospitals implementing the technique in the subsequent 2 years, but it did not impact the success rates in centers where it was already performed. This study highlights the potential of simulation-based courses in ECV, as well as the need to improve patients´ access to the technique and to centralize ECV services at a regional level.

Trial and error - Outcome of breech presentation depending on birth mode and root cause analysis of severe adverse events.

OBJECTIVES: The debate about the safest birth mode for breech presentation at term remains unresolved. The comparison of a vaginal breech birth (VBB) with an elective caesarean section (CS) regarding fetal outcomes favors the CS. However, the question of whether attempting a VBB is associated with poorer fetal outcomes is examined in this study. Additionally, the study evaluates factors contributing to a successful VBB and illustrates possible errors in VBB management. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a retrospective analysis of term breech births over 15 years in a Perinatal Center Level I regarding fetal, maternal, and obstetric outcomes by comparing successful with unsuccessful VBB attempt and all attempted VBB vs. CS including a multivariate analysis of predictors for a successful VBB. A root cause analysis of severe adverse events (SAE) was conducted to evaluate factors leading to poorer fetal outcomes in VBB. RESULTS: Of 863 breech cases, in 78 % a CS was performed and in 22 % a VBB was attempted, with 57 % succeeding. Comparing successful with unsuccessful VBB attempts, successful VBB showed significantly lower maternal blood loss (p < 0.001) but poorer umbilical arterial pH (UApH) (p < 0.001), while other fetal outcome parameters showed no significant differences. Predictive factors for a successful VBB attempt were a body mass index (BMI) below 30.0 kg/m2 (p = 0.010) and multiparity (p = 0.003). Comparing all attempted VBB to CS, maternal blood loss was significantly higher in CS (p < 0.001), while fetal outcomes were significantly worse in VBB attempts, included poorer Apgar scores (p < 0.001), poorer UApH values (p < 0.001), higher transfer rate to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) (p < 0.001) and higher rate of respiratory support in the first 24 h (p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: The failed attempt of VBB indicates significantly worse UApH without lower Apgar scores or higher transfer rate to the NICU. The likelihood of a successful VBB is 9% lower with obesity and 2.5 times higher in multiparous women. Attempting a VBB should include detailed pre-labor counseling, regarding predictive success factors, an experienced team, and consistent management during birth.

Barriers and facilitators for implementation of OptiBreech collaborative care: A qualitative study as part of an implementation process evaluation.

PROBLEM: Lack of opportunity for breech training and clinical experience reduced professional confidence and expertise in supporting vaginal breech birth. BACKGROUND: OptiBreech collaborative care is a care pathway for breech presentation at term that aims to enable improve safety through person-centred care and improved training opportunities for maternity professionals, within dedicated clinics and intrapartum support. In feasibility work, barriers and facilitators to team implementation were observed by team members. AIM: This study sought to describe factors affecting optimal future implementation and safety of OptiBreech care. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with staff members at 13 OptiBreech trial sites (17 midwives and 4 obstetricians, n=21), via video conferencing software. The Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) was used to identify factors impacting team implementation. Themes identified in the TDF were refined in reflexive discussion and grouped into key facilitators, key barriers, and dynamic factors (which span both barriers and facilitators). The interviews were then coded, analysed, and interpreted according to the refined framework. FINDINGS: The key facilitators were broadly categorised within skill development, beliefs about capabilities, and social support from the wider multidisciplinary team. Key barrier categories were resources, social obstacles, and fears about consequences. Dynamic factor categories were individual responsibility, training, and attending births. CONCLUSION: While some factors affecting implementation were specific to the individuals and cultures of certain Trusts, recommendations emerged from analysis that are more widely applicable across multiple settings. These should be considered going forward for future service implementation, and in the next stage of OptiBreech clinical trials.

Malpresentation and autism spectrum disorder in the study to explore early development.

BACKGROUND: An infant's presentation at delivery may be an early indicator of developmental differences. Non-vertex presentation (malpresentation) complicates delivery and often leads to caesarean section, which has been associated with neurodevelopmental delays, including autism spectrum disorder (ASD). However, malpresentation could be an early sign of an existing developmental problem that is also an upstream factor from caesarean delivery. Little research has been done to investigate the association between malpresentation and ASD. OBJECTIVES: We examine the association between malpresentation at delivery and ASD and whether this association differs by gestational age. METHODS: We used data from the Study to Explore Early Development (SEED), a multi-site, case-control study of children with ASD compared to population controls. The foetal presentation was determined using medical records, birth records and maternal interviews. We defined malpresentation as a non-vertex presentation at delivery, then further categorised into breech and other malpresentation. We used multivariable logistic regression to estimate the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) for the association between malpresentation and ASD. RESULTS: We included 4047 SEED participants, 1873 children with ASD and 2174 controls. At delivery, most infants presented vertex (n = 3760, 92.9%). Malpresentation was associated with higher odds of ASD (aOR 1.31, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02, 1.68) after adjustment for maternal age, poverty level, hypertensive disorder and smoking. The association was similar for breech and other types of malpresentation (aOR 1.28, 95% CI 0.97, 1.70 and aOR 1.40, 95% CI 0.87, 2.26, respectively) and did not differ markedly by gestational age. CONCLUSIONS: Malpresentation at delivery was modestly associated with ASD. Early monitoring of the neurodevelopment of children born with malpresentation could identify children with ASD sooner and enhance opportunities to provide support to optimise developmental outcomes.

Neonatal outcomes of planned vaginal delivery versus planned cesarean section for breech presentation at term: Population-based study on 546,842 breech births across the United States between 2008 and 2017.

INTRODUCTION: Over the last several decades, cesarean delivery has been recommended as the safest mode of delivery for breech presentations. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of planned vaginal births with planned cesarean births in breech presenting fetuses. METHODS: This retrospective population-based cohort study utilized data from the United States' Period Linked Birth-Infant Death Public Use Files from 2008 to 2017. All term singleton breech deliveries of a live baby without congenital anomalies were identified (n = 546,842) and divided into two cohorts: women who had a planned vaginal birth (n = 116,828), and women who had a planned cesarean section (n = 430,014). Multivariate logistic regression models, adjusted for maternal baseline characteristics, examined the associations between the planned delivery method and neonatal outcomes. RESULTS: It was observed that 26.14 % of the planned vaginal birth cohort had a vaginal delivery. In adjusted analyses, undergoing a planned vaginal birth for breech delivery was associated with an increased risk of adverse neonatal outcomes including infant death, OR 1.32, 95 % CI 1.16-1.52, admission to NICU,1.23, 1.19-1.27, ventilation support at 〈 6 h of life, 1.47, 1.42-1.52, ventilation support at 〉 6 h of life, 1.19, 1.08-1.31, and Apgar score of ≤3 at 5 min, 2.27, 2.06-2.50. CONCLUSION: In women carrying fetuses in breech presentation, having a planned vaginal birth had a low success rate and was associated with increased risk of neonatal morbidity and mortality. Women should be carefully counselled on the risks associated with breech vaginal delivery as well as the low success rate of vaginal delivery.

Circumferential Vaginal Tear During the Cesarean Section: A Complication of Vaginal Hand Assistance in a Deeply Impacted Fetal Head.

We present the case of a 29-year-old, G2P1+0 pregnant woman who was unbooked and presented to the emergency room at 36+5 weeks gestation with complaints of leaking liquor, labour pains, vaginal bleeding and raised blood pressure. Her history revealed previous vaginal delivery and index pregnancy complicated with obstetric cholestasis, pre-eclampsia, and fetal growth restriction. During her hospital course, the patient underwent an emergency cesarean section due to uncontrolled blood pressure and pathological cardiotocograph (CTG) revealing a deeply impacted fetal head intraoperatively and necessitating an inverted T incision on the uterus. Although the newborn was delivered successfully, a full-thickness circumferential tear in the vaginal vault was discovered, requiring immediate surgical repair with the involvement of a urologist. The patient experienced postoperative complications related to pre-eclampsia and sepsis but was eventually discharged in stable condition. This case highlights the importance of prompt diagnosis and management of obstetric emergencies especially in the case of deeply impacted fetal head, and the need for a multidisciplinary approach to address complications such as vaginal tears during cesarean sections due to vaginal assistance in delivering the baby.

Routine maneuvers in eutocic breech vaginal delivery at term: A prospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To study neonatal and maternal outcomes associated with routine maneuvers in breech vaginal delivery at term. METHODS: This was a secondary analysis of the multicenter PREMODA observational prospective study in France and Belgium. We included women with vaginal breech delivery, excluding those who underwent maneuvers to resolve a dystocic delivery. Maternal data and characteristics of labor, in addition to neonatal and maternal outcomes, were recorded. We defined two groups according to mode of delivery; breech vaginal delivery with or without routine maneuvers, and we compared the variables between the groups. To assess the factors associated with adverse perinatal outcomes, a multivariate logistic regression with adjustment for confounders was performed. RESULTS: Of the 2502 women with planned vaginal deliveries, 1794 were delivered vaginally, 606 of whom were excluded from the study due to maneuvers performed for dystocia. A total of 25 other patients were excluded as a result of missing data. A total of 537 women were included in the routine maneuvers group and 626 women in the no maneuvers group. Adverse perinatal outcome was similar for the two groups (4.5% vs 5.0%, P = 0.65) and no neonatal deaths were reported. Third degree perineal tear and postpartum hemorrhage >1 L rates were comparable for the two groups. After adjustment, the factors associated with adverse perinatal outcomes were primiparity and birth weight <2500 g. CONCLUSION: Routine maneuvers were not associated with an increase in neonatal morbidity in our population.

Effect of anesthesia on the success rate of external cephalic version: GRADE- assessed systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: External cephalic version (ECV) is a medical procedure in which an extracorporeal manipulation is performed to render the breech presentation (BP) fetus in the cephalic position. The use of anesthesia to facilitate repositioning has been evaluated in various randomized clinical trials (RCTs), but its potential effectiveness remains controversial. METHODS: A systematic literature search was carried out in 8 electronic databases. In the meta-analysis, a random effects model was used to calculate the pooled relative risk (RR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI), and the pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) and its 95% CI, in order to systematically assess the effect of anesthesia on the success rates of ECV, vaginal delivery, cesarean delivery as well as other outcomes. Relevant subgroup analyses, publication bias test and sensitivity analyses were also conducted. RESULTS: This review included 17 RCTs. Women who received anesthesia had a significantly higher incidence of successful ECV (RR: 1.37, 95% CIs: 1.19-1.58) and vaginal delivery (RR: 1.23, 95% CIs: 1.03-1.47), and a significantly lower incidence of cesarean delivery (RR: 0.69, 95% CIs: 0.53-0.91), compared with those who did not. CONCLUSION: The administration of anesthesia not only significantly reduces maternal pain but also significantly increases the success rate of ECV in women with malpresentation at term, leading to a significant rise in the incidence of vaginal delivery. However, it may increase the incidence of maternal hypotension. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: The protocol was prospectively registered with PROSPERO, registration CRD42022381552.

How do physicians respond to new medical research?

What happens when the findings of a prominent medical study are overturned? Using a medical trial on breech births, we estimate the effect of the reversal of such a medical study on physician choices and infant health outcomes. Using the United States Birth Certificate Records from 1995 to 2010, we employ a difference-in-differences estimator for C-sections, low Apgar, and low birth weight measures. We find that the reversal of a multi-site, high profile, randomized control trial on the appropriate delivery of term breech births, the Term Breech Trial, led to a 15%-23% decline in C-sections for such births at a time when the overall trend in C-sections was rising. We find our largest estimated effects amongst traditionally disadvantaged groups (i.e., non-white, and minimal education). However, we do not find that such a change in practice had significant impacts on infant health. Contrary to prior studies, we find that physicians updated their beliefs quickly, and do indeed adjust to new medical research, particularly young physicians, prior to mandatory policy or professional guidelines.

Cesarean delivery is associated with lower neonatal mortality among breech pregnancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis of preterm deliveries ≤32 weeks of gestation.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association between actual and planned modes of delivery, neonatal mortality, and short-term outcomes among preterm pregnancies ≤32 weeks of gestation. DATA SOURCES: A systematic literature search was conducted in 3 main databases (PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to November 16, 2022. The protocol was registered in advance in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42022377870). STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Eligible studies examined pregnancies ≤32nd gestational week. All infants received active care, and the outcomes were reported separately by different modes of delivery. Singleton and twin pregnancies at vertex and breech presentations were included. Studies that included pregnancies complicated with preeclampsia and abruptio placentae were excluded. Primary outcomes were neonatal mortality and intraventricular hemorrhage. STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS: Articles were selected by title, abstract, and full text, and disagreements were resolved by consensus. Random effects model-based odds ratios with corresponding 95% confidence intervals were calculated for dichotomous outcomes. Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies - of Interventions-I was used to assess the risk of bias. RESULTS: A total of 19 observational studies were included involving a total of 16,042 preterm infants in this systematic review and meta-analysis. Actual cesarean delivery improves survival (odds ratio, 0.62; 95% confidence interval, 0.42-0.9) and decreases the incidence of intraventricular hemorrhage (odds ratio, 0.70; confidence interval, 0.57-0.85) compared to vaginal delivery. Planned cesarean delivery does not improve the survival of very and extremely preterm infants compared to vaginal delivery (odds ratio, 0.87; 95% confidence interval, 0.53-1.44). Subset analysis found significantly lower odds of death for singleton breech preterm deliveries born by both planned (odds ratio, 0.56; 95% confidence interval, 0.32-0.98) and actual (odds ratio, 0.34; 95% confidence interval, 0.13-0.88) cesarean delivery. CONCLUSION: Cesarean delivery should be the mode of delivery for preterm ≤32 weeks of gestation breech births due to the higher mortality in preterm infants born via vaginal delivery.

Variations of cervical head entrapment in vaginal breech births: New insights on how to prevent, manage and resolve.

This paper presents a novel, systematic way to understand the causes of cervical head entrapment in vaginal breech births, and new insights into management. Three different types of cervical head entrapment are described, with detailed illustrations: unpredictable and potentially catastrophic, manageable, and preventable. The first affects preterm and growth-restricted fetuses. The second involves some degree of uterine prolapse. The third may result from prolonged head entrapment at the pelvic inlet, leaving time for cervical contraction or oedematous entrapment. Traditional and innovative strategies to resolve and prevent this complication are described and illustrated, with suggestions for further research.