Association Between use of an Adaptive Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Algorithm and Healthcare Utilization and Cost.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the association between use of adaptive pacing on clinical and economic outcomes of CRT recipients in a real-world analysis. BACKGROUND: The AdaptivCRTTM algorithm was shown in prior subgroup analyses of prospective trials to achieve clinical benefits, but a large prospective trial showed nonsignificant changes in the endpoint of mortality or heart failure hospitalizations. METHODS: CRT-implanted patients from the Optum Clinformatics® database with ≥90 days of follow-up were included. Remote monitoring data was used to classify patients based on CRT setting - adaptive biventricular and left ventricular pacing (aCRT) vs. standard biventricular pacing (Standard CRT). Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to adjust for baseline differences between groups. Mortality, 30-day readmissions, healthcare utilization, and payer and patient costs were evaluated post-implantation. RESULTS: This study included 2,412 aCRT and 1,638 Standard CRT patients (mean follow-up: 2.4 ± 1.4 years), with balanced baseline characteristics after adjustment. The aCRT group was associated with lower all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.88 [95% confidence interval (CI):0.80, 0.96]), fewer all-cause 30-day readmissions (adjusted incidence rate ratio = 0.87 [CI:0.81, 0.94]), and fewer all-cause and HF-related inpatient, outpatient, and emergency department (ED) visits. The aCRT cohort was also associated with lower all-cause outpatient payer-paid amounts and lower all-cause and HF-related inpatient and ED patient-paid amounts. CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective analysis of a large real-world cohort, use of an adaptive CRT algorithm was associated with lower mortality, reduced healthcare resource utilization, and lower payer and patient costs. LAY SUMMARY: While cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) improves quality of life and clinical outcomes for certain heart failure patients, some patients do not respond to this therapy. Adaptive CRT algorithms (aCRT), such as AdaptivCRTTM, have been developed with the goal of improving effectiveness of CRT, and consequently, clinical and economic outcomes. This research study used a large database of administrative claims data - which contains information on patient demographics, diagnoses, healthcare services received, mortality, and cost data - to compare clinical and economic outcomes between CRT patients with the aCRT algorithm turned on (aCRT group) and CRT patients with the aCRT algorithm turned off (standard CRT group). Statistical methods were used to adjust for baseline differences between the aCRT group and standard CRT groups. Ultimately, the aCRT group was found to have a lower risk of all-cause mortality, fewer all-cause 30-day readmissions, fewer hospital visits (including inpatient, outpatient, and emergency department visits), and lower costs to payers and patients for specific types of costs.

Mechanical dyssynchrony as a selection criterion for cardiac resynchronization therapy: Design of the AMEND-CRT trial.

AIMS: One third of patients do not improve after cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Septal flash (SF) and apical rocking (ApRock) are deformation patterns observed on echocardiography in most patients eligible for CRT. These markers of mechanical dyssynchrony have been associated to improved outcome after CRT in observational studies and may be useful to better select patients. The aim of this trial is to investigate whether the current guideline criteria for selecting patients for CRT should be modified and include SF and ApRock to improve therapy success rate, reduce excessive costs and prevent exposure to device-related complications in patients who would not benefit from CRT. METHODS: The AMEND-CRT trial is a multicentre, randomized, parallel-group, double-blind, sham-controlled trial with a non-inferiority design. The trial will include 578 patients scheduled for CRT according to the 2021 ESC guidelines who satisfy all inclusion criteria. The randomization is performed 1:1 to an active control arm ('guideline arm') or an experimental arm ('echo arm'). All participants receive a device, but in the echo arm, CRT is activated only when SF or ApRock or both are present. The outcome of both arms will be compared after 1 year. The primary outcome measures are the average change in left ventricular end-systolic volume and patient outcome assessed using a modified Packer Clinical Composite Score. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this trial will redefine the role of echocardiography in CRT and potentially determine which patients with heart failure and a prolonged QRS duration should receive CRT, especially in patients who currently have a class IIa or class IIb recommendation.

Feasibility, Safety and Short-Term Follow-Up Of Defibrillator Lead at Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing Location: A Pilot Study.

BACKGROUND: Left bundle branch area pacing(LBBAP) has been increasingly adopted as an alternative modality for cardiac-resynchronization-therapy(CRT). The feasibility and safety of utilizing LBBAP lead to provide sensing of ventricular arrhythmia in patients receiving implantable cardioverter defibrillator(ICD) with CRT has been demonstrated recently OBJECTIVES: Aim of our study was to analyse the feasibility, safety and short-term follow-up of a traditional defibrillator lead at LBBAP location. METHODS: Patients who underwent successful LBBAP-defibrillator using DF-1/DF-4 lead and delivery catheter were included in the study. Defibrillation threshold(DFT) testing was performed after implantation to assess the ability of LBBAP defibrillator lead to sense and provide appropriate therapy for ventricular arrhythmia. RESULTS: Though the ICD-lead could be successfully deployed in LBB area in 7 out of 8 patients, it was repositioned to right-ventricle(RV) apex due to atrial-oversensing in one and cheesy-septum in another patient. Acute procedural success was 62.5%(5/8 patients). Mean age 62.6±21.6 years. Mean procedural duration 115.6±38.1 minutes with LBBAP defibrillator lead fluoroscopy duration of 10.6±3.5 minutes. Mean capture threshold 0.58±0.23V/0.4ms, sensed R-wave amplitude 9.6±2.2mV, pacing-impedance 560±145Ohms and shock impedance of 65.4±5.5Ohms. Defibrillation testing was successful in inducing ventricular-fibrillation and could be sensed and reverted promptly by the shock delivered through the lead. During mean follow-up of 3.8±2.2 months the pacing parameters remained stable. There were no episodes of inappropriate arrhythmia detection or therapy delivery during follow-up. CONCLUSION: LBBAP defibrillator is feasible, safe and effective during short-term follow-up. DFT-testing at the time of implantation will help in ensuring appropriate sensing and treatment of ventricular arrhythmias.

Association between echocardiography-derived haemodynamic force parameters and left ventricular reverse remodelling after cardiac resynchronization therapy.

AIMS: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) may induce left ventricular (LV) reverse remodelling (=LV response) in patients with heart failure. Intraventricular pressure gradients can be quantified using echocardiography-derived haemodynamic forces (HDF). The aim was to evaluate the association between baseline HDF and LV response and to compare the change of HDF after CRT between LV responders and LV non-responders. METHODS AND RESULTS: The following HDF parameters were assessed: 1)apical-basal (AB) strength, 2)lateral-septal strength, 3)force vector angle, 4)systolic AB impulse, 5)systolic force vector angle. LV response was defined as a reduction of LV end-systolic volume ≥15% at six months. One hundred ninety-six patients were included (64±11 years, 122(62%) men), 136(69%) showed LV response. On multivariable logistic regression analysis, the force vector angle in the complete heart cycle (OR 1.083 (95%CI 1.018, 1.153), p=0.012) and the systolic force vector angle (OR 1.089 (95%CI 1.021, 1.161), p=0.009), both included in separate models, were independently associated with LV response. Six months after CRT, LV responders had greater AB strength, AB impulse and higher force vector angles, while LV non-responders only showed improvement in the force vector angle in the complete heart cycle. CONCLUSION: The orientation of HDF at baseline is associated with LV response to CRT. Six months after CRT, the orientation of HDF improves in LV responders and LV non-responders, while the magnitude of AB HDF only improves in LV responders.

Performance of the Quadripolar CRT-D system: 5-Year Results from the Quadripolar Pacing Post Approval Study.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is associated with challenges such as elevated capture thresholds, diaphragmatic stimulation, and lead instability. OBJECTIVE: Assess the chronic safety and efficacy of the quadripolar CRT-D device system with the Quartet 1458Q Left Ventricular (LV) lead in a CRT-indicated population followed for 5 years and evaluate all-cause mortality and impact of baseline characteristics on survival through 5 years. METHODS: Patients indicated for a CRT-D system were followed every 6 months post-implant for 5 years and assessed device performance and adverse events at each visit. The three primary endpoints were freedom from quadripolar CRT-D system-related complications through 5 years, freedom from Quartet 1458Q LV lead-related complications through 5 years, and the mean programmed pacing capture threshold at 5 years. RESULTS: The study enrolled 1,970 subjects at 71 sites. The quadripolar CRT-D system was successfully implanted in 97.2% of subjects. Freedom from quadripolar CRT-D device system-related complications through 5 years was 89.7% and freedom from Quartet 1458Q LV lead-related complications through 5 years was 95.7%. 3.49 % of subjects had LV lead-related complications and an overall LV lead complication rate was 0.0122 events per subject-year. A mean LV pacing capture threshold was 1.52 ± 1.01 V at 5 years. The 5-year survival rate was 67.4%. CONCLUSION: The quadripolar CRT-D system with the Quartet 1458Q LV lead exhibited low rates of complications and stable electrical performance through 5 years of follow-up and suggested a higher 5-year survival rate compared to traditional CRT systems.

Prognostic value of serum albumin in heart failure patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Aim: There is a lack of data about the association between admission serum albumin levels and long-term mortality in heart failure (HF) patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators (CRT-D). We aim to investigate this connection in HF patients with CRT-D. Methods: The study population consisted of 477 HF patients with CRT-D. The cohort was divided into three groups according to albumin values, and the relationship between these groups and long-term mortality were evaluated. Results: Long-term all-cause mortality (HR: 3.32, 95% CI: 2.12-6.84), appropriate (HR: 4.44, 95% CI: 2.44-8.06) and inappropriate (HR: 2.95, 95% CI: 1.88-6.02) shocks were higher in the low albumin group. Conclusion: Low albumin levels are associated with the long-term mortality and appropriate shock treatment in HF patients with CRT-D.

[Box: see text].

Left bundle branch block cardiomyopathy (LBBB-CMP): from the not-so-benign finding of idiopathic LBBB to LBBB-CMP diagnosis and treatment.

Introduction Idiopathic left bundle branch block (iLBBB) is an uncommon finding. Its benignity has been increasingly questioned, though its natural history remains poorly clarified. Similarly, LBBB-cardiomyopathy (LBBB-CM) has been also increasingly recognized as a distinct entity, where electromechanical dyssynchrony seems to play a central role in left ventricular dysfunction (LVD) development. Still, it remains a scarcely studied topic. There is an urgent need for investigation and evidence reinforcement in these areas. OBJECTIVES: two main objectives: (1) to explore the natural history of "asymptomatic" iLBBB carriers; (2) to characterize the outcomes and therapeutic approach used in a "real-world" cohort of possible LBBB-CMP patients (pts). METHODS: tertiary care centre retrospective study of pts with iLBBB and possible LBBB-CMP, screened from a large hospital electrocardiographic database from 2011 to 2017 (LBBB = 347). To assign the 1st objective, only pts with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥ 50% and available follow-up (FU) data were included (n = 152). Regarding the 2nd objective, possible LBBB-CMP pts were selected and defined as iLBBB pts with LVD (LVEF < 50%) and no secondary causes for LVD (n = 53). Data were based on pts' careful review of medical records. RESULTS: focusing our 1st objective, 152 iLBBB carriers were identified. Median FU time were 8 years, and 61% were female. During FU, approximately 25% developed LVD, 20% needed ≥ 1 cardiovascular (CV) hospitalization, and 15% needed a cardiac device implantation. The majority (2/3) of pts with LVD on FU (n = 35) had no secondary causes for LVD, being classified as possible LBBB-CMP pts. Time-to-LVD analysis showed no differences between pts with a known cause for LVD vs LBBB-CMP pts (Log-rank = 0.713). Concerning the 2nd objective, 53 possible LBBB-CMP pts were identified. Median FU time were 10 years, and 51% were female. During the FU, 77% presented heart failure (HF) symptoms, and 42% needed ≥ 1 CV hospitalization, mainly due to HF. Half presented severe LVD at some point in time, and 55% needed a cardiac device, most of them a cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) device. Comparing CRT with non-CRT pts, no differences were found in terms of medical therapy, but better outcomes were observed in CRT group: LVEF improvement was higher (median LVEF improvement of 11% in non-CRT vs 27% in CRT; p < 0.001), and fully recovery from LVD was more frequent (50% of CRT vs 14% non-CRT; p = 0.028). CONCLUSION: our data strengthen current evidence on natural history of iLBBB, showing significant CV morbidity associated with the presence of iLBBB, and reinforces the need for a serial and proper FU of these carriers. Our data on "real-world" possible LBBB-CMP pts shows high rates of CV events, namely HF-related events, and supports the growing evidence pointing out CRT as this subgroup of pts' cornerstone of treatment. In conclusion, our work sheds additional light on these largely unknown topics and underlines the urgent need for larger and prospective studies addressing the identification of LVD development predictors in iLBBB carriers, as well as the establishment of diagnostic criteria and therapeutic approach for LBBB-CMP.

Obesity paradox in patients with reduced ejection fraction eligible for device implantation - an observational study.

AIMS: Patients with obesity have an overall higher cardiovascular risk, at the same time obesity could be associated with a better outcome in a certain subgroup of patients, a phenomenon known as the obesity paradox. Data are scarce in candidates for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). We aimed to investigate the association between body mass index (BMI) and all-cause mortality in patients eligible for CRT. METHODS: Altogether 1,585 patients underwent cardiac resynchronization therapy between 2000-2020 and were categorized based on their BMI, 459 (29%) patients with normal weight (BMI < 25 kg/m2), 641 (40%) patients with overweight (BMI 25- < 30 kg/m2) and 485 (31%) with obesity (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2). The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality, heart transplantation, and left ventricular assist device implantation. We assessed periprocedural complications and 6-month echocardiographic response. RESULTS: Normal-weight patients were older compared to patients with overweight or obesity (70 years vs. 69 years vs. 68 years; P 2 26% vs. BMI 25- < 30 kg/m2 37% vs. BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 48%; P 2 71% vs. BMI 25- < 30 kg/m2 74% vs. BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 82%; P 2 group, 61% in the BMI 25- < 30 kg/m2 group and 58% in the BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 group (log-rank P2 25% vs. BMI 25- < 30 kg/m2 28% vs. BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 26%; P = 0.48). Left ventricular ejection fraction improved significantly in all patient groups (BMI < 25 kg/m2 median ∆ $$ \Delta $$ -LVEF 7% vs. BMI 25- < 30 kg/m2 median ∆ $$ \Delta $$ -LVEF 7.5% vs. BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 median ∆ $$ \Delta $$ -LVEF 6%; P < 0.0001) with a similar proportion of developing reverse remodeling (BMI < 25 kg/m2 58% vs. BMI 25- < 30 kg/m2 61% vs. BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 57%; P = 0.48); P = 0.75). CONCLUSIONS: The obesity paradox was present in our HF cohort at long-term, patients underwent CRT implantation with obesity and free of comorbidities showed mortality benefit compared to normal weight patients. Patients with obesity showed similar echocardiographic response and safety outcomes compared to normal weight patients.

Clinical Usefulness of the Active Fixation Quadripolar Left Ventricular Lead Compared With the Passive Fixation Quadripolar Lead in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.

BACKGROUND: This study compared the stability of the Medtronic Attain Stability Quad (ASQ), a novel quadripolar active fixation left ventricular (LV) lead with a side helix, to that of conventional quadripolar leads with passive fixation (non-ASQ) and evaluated their LV lead performance.Methods and Results: In all, 183 consecutive patients (69 ASQ, 114 non-ASQ) who underwent cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) between January 2018 and June 2021 were enrolled. Complications, including elevated pacing capture threshold (PCT) levels, phrenic nerve stimulation (PNS), and LV lead dislodgement, were analyzed during the postimplantation period until the first outpatient visit after discharge. The frequency of LV lead-related complications was significantly lower in the ASQ than non-ASQ group (14% vs. 30%, respectively; P=0.019). Specifically, LV lead dislodgement occurred only in the non-ASQ group, and elevated PCT levels were significantly lower in the ASQ group (7% vs. 23%; P=0.007). Kaplan-Meier analysis confirmed a significantly lower incidence of LV lead-related complications in the ASQ group (log-rank P=0.005). Cox multivariable regression analysis showed a significant reduction in lead-related complications associated with ASQ (hazard ratio 0.44; 95% confidence interval 0.23-0.83; P=0.011). CONCLUSIONS: The ASQ group exhibited fewer LV lead-related complications requiring reintervention and setting changes than the non-ASQ group. Thus, the ASQ may be a favorable choice for CRT device implantation.

Deactivation of cardiac implantable electronic devices in palliative patients: When and how.

Cardiac implantable electronic devices have transformed medicine as they improve quality of life and prevent premature death. In palliative care settings, deactivation of these devices must be discussed, particularly at end-of-life. In terminally ill patients it is consensual to recommend implantable cardioverter defibrillator deactivation once shocks are frequent and painful. Concerning pacemakers, the decision to deactivate is controversial and it usually is not an option at patients' end-of-life, since in pacing-dependent patients, such low heart rates might induce symptoms of bradycardia, with no impact on survival. Regarding cardiac resynchronization therapy, deactivation is not recommended as it can worsen symptoms. Left ventricular assistance device deactivation at end-of-life is a well-accepted practice, since it has the benefit of ending the physical burden associated with the device. Advance care planning should be encouraged and patients should be informed that deactivation is possible.

Clinical Outcomes with Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients with Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Systematic Review and Proportional Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) is an inflammatory condition that can present with heart failure (HF). Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is known to improve clinical outcomes for patients with left bundle branch block in the general HF population. However, data about the outcomes of CRT in CS is limited. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed/Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from inception to February 2024 to identify studies that reported clinical outcomes following the use of CRT in patients with CS. Data for outcomes was extracted, pooled, and analyzed. OpenMetaAnalyst was used for pooling untransformed proportions along with the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Five studies with a total of 176 CS patients who received CRT were included. The pooled incidence for all-cause mortality was 7.6% (95% CI: -3% to 18%), for HF-related hospitalizations 23.2% (95% CI: 2% to 43%), and for major adverse cerebral and cardiovascular events 27% (95% CI: 8% to 45%) after a mean follow-up of 60.1 (±48.7) months. The pooled left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was 34.28% (95% CI: 29.88% to 38.68%) demonstrating an improvement of 3.75% in LVEF from baseline LVEF of 30.58% (95% CI: 24.68% to 36.48%). The mean New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class was 2.16 (95% CI: 1.47 to 2.84) after CRT as compared to the baseline mean NYHA of 2.58 (95% CI: 2.29 to 2.86). CONCLUSION: Although improvements were observed in LVEF and mean NYHA, mortality was high in CS patients with CRT.

Conduction System Pacing: Hope, Challenges, and the Journey Forward.

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW: Cardiac pacing has evolved in recent years currently culminating in the specific stimulation of the cardiac conduction system (conduction system pacing, CSP). This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the available literature on CSP, focusing on a critical classification of studies comparing CSP with standard treatment in the two fields of pacing for bradycardia and cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with heart failure. The article will also elaborate specific benefits and limitations associated with CSP modalities of His bundle pacing (HBP) and left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP). RECENT FINDINGS: Based on a growing number of observational studies for different indications of pacing therapy, both CSP modalities investigated are advantageous over standard treatment in terms of narrowing the paced QRS complex and preserving or improving left ventricular systolic function. Less consistent evidence exists with regard to the improvement of heart failure-related rehospitalization rates or mortality, and effect sizes vary between HBP and LBBAP. LBBAP is superior over HBP in terms of lead measurements and procedural duration. With regard to all reported outcomes, evidence from large scale randomized controlled clinical trials (RCT) is still scarce. CSP has the potential to sustainably improve patient care in cardiac pacing therapy if patients are appropriately selected and limitations are considered. With this review, we offer not only a summary of existing data, but also an outlook on probable future developments in the field, as well as a detailed summary of upcoming RCTs that provide insights into how the journey of CSP continues.

Cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator implantation with shock lead placement in the left bundle branch area: a case report.

Background: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with biventricular pacing is a well-established therapy. Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) is a safe technique providing physiological pacing, and LBBAP-optimized CRT (LOT-CRT) has been shown to provide better electrical resynchronization than traditional CRT. However, there are few reports on shock lead placement in the left bundle branch area (LBBA) during CRT-defibrillator (CRT-D) implantation. Case summary: A 76-year-old woman with heart failure from dilated cardiomyopathy presented with left bundle branch block pattern (QRS duration, 160 ms). Left ventricular ejection fraction was 21%. Cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator implantation was performed due to worsening symptoms. By reshaping the Agilis HisPro catheter and adding a septal curve, the shock lead was placed deep into the ventricular septum, narrowing QRS duration to 114 ms. Left ventricular activation time was 84 ms. A defibrillation threshold test confirmed successful treatment without adverse events. At 6-month follow-up, left ventricular ejection fraction improved from 21 to 63%, with the patient's condition improving from New York Heart Association class III to class I. Discussion: It was reported that QRS narrowing in CRT was related to long-term mortality, and LOT-CRT further decreased QRS duration as compared with LBBP only or biventricular pacing and increased the response rate. Combining LBBAP with coronary sinus pacing can potentially achieve superior electrical resynchronization. Lack of a suitable tool for direct shock lead placement in LBBA necessitated additional LBBAP lead in conventional LOT-CRT. Our successful LOT-CRT-D procedure with minimal number of leads through Agilis HisPro catheter reshaping enabled direct LBBA shock lead placement.

LV cathode position in CRT recipients: How can we benefit from CMR?

BACKGROUND: Left ventricular lead positioning represents a key step in CRT optimization. However, evidence for its guidance based on specific topographical factors and related imaging techniques is sparse. OBJECTIVE: To analyze reverse remodeling (RR) and clinical events in CRT recipients based on LV cathode (LVC) position relative to latest mechanical activation (LMA) and scar as determined by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR). METHODS: This is a retrospective single-center study of 68 consecutive Q-LV-guided CRT-D and CRT-P recipients. Through CMR-based 3D reconstructions overlayed on fluoroscopy images, LVCs were stratified as concordant, adjacent, or discordant to LMA (3 segments with latest and greatest radial strain) and scar (segments with >50% scar transmurality). The primary endpoint of RR (expressed as percentage ESV change) and secondary composite endpoint of HF hospitalizations, LVAD/heart transplant, or cardiovascular death were compared across categories. RESULTS: LVC proximity to LMA was associated with a progressive increase in RR (percentage ESV change: concordant -47.0 ± 5.9%, adjacent -31.4 ± 3.1%, discordant +0.4 ± 3.7%), while proximity to scar was associated with sharply decreasing RR (concordant +10.7 ± 12.9%, adjacent +0.3 ± 5.3%, discordant -31.3 ± 4.4%, no scar -35.4 ± 4.8%). 4 integrated classes of LVC position demonstrated a significant positive RR gradient the more optimal the category (class I -47.0 ± 5.9%, class II -34.9 ± 2.8%, class III -5.5 ± 4.3%, class IV + 3.4 ± 5.2%). Freedom from composite secondary endpoint of HF hospitalization, LVAD/heart transplant, or cardiovascular death confirmed these trends demonstrating significant differences across both integrated as well as individual LMA and scar categories. CONCLUSION: Integrated CMR-determined LVC position relative to LMA and scar stratifies response to CRT.

A nomogram for predicting CRT response based on multi-parameter features.

OBJECTIVE: To construct a nomogram for predicting the responsiveness of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in patients with chronic heart failure and verify its predictive efficacy. METHOD: A retrospective study was conducted including 109 patients with chronic heart failure who successfully received CRT from January 2018 to December 2022. According to patients after six months of the CRT preoperative improving acuity in the left ventricular ejection fraction is 5% or at least improve grade 1 NYHA heart function classification, divided into responsive group and non-responsive group. Clinical data of patients were collected, and LASSO regression analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis were used to explore relative factors. A nomogram was constructed, and the predictive performance of the nomogram was evaluated using the calibration curve and decision curve analysis (DCA). RESULTS: Among the 109 patients, 61 were assigned to the CRT-responsive group, while 48 were assigned to the non-responsive group. LASSO regression analysis showed that left ventricular end-systolic volume, diffuse fibrosis, and left bundle branch block (LBBB) were independent factors for CRT responsiveness in patients with heart failure (P < 0.05). Based on the above three predictive factors, a nomogram was constructed. The ROC curve analysis showed that the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.865 (95% CI 0.794-0.935). The calibration curve analysis showed that the predicted probability of the nomogram is consistent with the actual occurrence rate. DCA showed that the line graph model has an excellent clinical net benefit rate. CONCLUSION: The nomogram constructed based on clinical features, laboratory, and imaging examinations in this study has high discrimination and calibration in predicting CRT responsiveness in patients with chronic heart failure.

[New pacing strategies for heart failure]. / Neue Pacing-Strategien bei Herzinsuffizienz.

In patients with a reduced left ventricular (LV) systolic function (ejection fraction < 35%) and a left bundle branch block with a QRS duration > 130 ms, cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) can contribute to an improvement in the quality of life and a reduction in mortality. The resynchronization is mostly achieved by pacing via an epicardial LV lead in the coronary sinus; however, this approach is often limited by the patient's venous anatomy and an increase in the stimulation threshold over time. In addition, up to 30% of patients do not respond to the intervention. New treatment approaches involve direct stimulation of the conduction system by pacing of the bundle of His or left bundle branch. This enables a more physiological propagation of the stimulus. Pacing of the left bundle branch is achieved by advancing the lead into the right ventricle and screwing it deep into the interventricular septum. Due to the relatively large target area of the left bundle branch the success rate is very high (currently > 90%). Observational studies have shown a greater reduction in the QRS duration, a more pronounced improvement in systolic function and a lower hospitalization rate for heart failure associated with conduction system pacing compared to CRT using a coronary sinus lead. These findings have been confirmed in small randomized trials. Therefore, the use of left bundle branch pacing should be considered not only as a bail out in the case of failed resynchronization using coronary sinus lead placement but increasingly also as an initial pacing strategy. The results of the first large randomized trials are expected to be released in late 2024.

Benefits of upgrading right ventricular to biventricular pacing in heart failure patients with atrial fibrillation.

AIMS: Recommendations on cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in patients with atrial fibrillation or flutter (AF) are based on less robust evidence than those in sinus rhythm (SR). We aimed to assess the efficacy of CRT upgrade in the BUDAPEST-CRT Upgrade trial population by their baseline rhythm. METHODS AND RESULTS: Heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and previously implanted pacemaker (PM) or implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) and ≥20% right ventricular (RV) pacing burden were randomized to CRT with defibrillator (CRT-D) upgrade (n = 215) or ICD (n = 145). Primary [HF hospitalization (HFH), all-cause mortality, or <15% reduction of left ventricular end-systolic volume] and secondary outcomes were investigated. At enrolment, 131 (36%) patients had AF, who had an increased risk for HFH as compared with those with SR [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 2.99; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.26-7.13; P = 0.013]. The effect of CRT-D upgrade was similar in patients with AF as in those with SR [AF adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.06; 95% CI 0.02-0.17; P < 0.001; SR aOR 0.13; 95% CI 0.07-0.27; P < 0.001; interaction P = 0.29] during the mean follow-up time of 12.4 months. Also, it decreased the risk of HFH or all-cause mortality (aHR 0.33; 95% CI 0.16-0.70; P = 0.003; interaction P = 0.17) and improved the echocardiographic response (left ventricular end-diastolic volume difference -49.21 mL; 95% CI -69.10 to -29.32; P < 0.001; interaction P = 0.21). CONCLUSION: In HFrEF patients with AF and PM/ICD with high RV pacing burden, CRT-D upgrade decreased the risk of HFH and improved reverse remodelling when compared with ICD, similar to that seen in patients in SR.

A predictive model of super response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in short-term period.

BACKGROUND: The left bundle branch block, nonischemic heart failure (HF) and female gender are the most powerful predictors of a super response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). It is important to identify super responders who can derive most benefits from CRT. We aimed to establish a predicting model that could be used for prognosis of a super response to CRT in short-term period. METHODS: Patients with QRS ≥ 130 ms, New York Heart Association (NYHA) II-III class of HF, left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 35% and indications for CRT were included in the study. Before and 6 month after CRT the electrocardiography, echocardiography and cardiac scintigraphy were performed. The study's primary endpoint was the NYHA class improvement ≥ 1 and left ventricle end systolic volume decrease > 30% or LVEF improvement > 15% after 6 month CRT. Based on collected data, we developed a predictive model regarding a super response to CRT. RESULTS: Of 49 (100.0%) patients, 32 (65.3%) had a super response to CRT. Patients with a super response were likelier to have a lower cardiac index (p = 0.007), higher rates of interventricular delay (IVD) (p = 0.003), phase standard deviation of left ventricle anterior wall (PSD LVAW) (p = 0.009) and ∆QRS (p = 0.02). Only IVD and PSD LVAW were independently associated with a super response to CRT in univariate and multivariate logistic regression. We created a logistic equation and calculated a cut-off value. The resulting ROC curve revealed a discriminative ability with AUC of 0.812 (sensitivity 90.62%; specificity 70.59%). CONCLUSION: Our predictive model is able to distinguish patients with a super response to CRT.