Clinical presentation, risk factors and outcome of central nervous system metastasis vs stroke in cancer patients.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Cancer and stroke are the second and third causes of death worldwide; brain metastases (BM) occur in one third of patients with cancer, any neurologic deficit in these population always prompts the clinician to discard metastases for their presence carries a bad outcome. Both might share clinical presentation and differences in their outcome are not entirely known. The aim was to compare risk factors, clinical presentation, and outcome of cancer patients with BM vs stroke. METHODS: A descriptive study with prospectively acquired data from a cancer referral center included patients seen at the neuro-oncologic unit from March 2011 to February 2018 with confirmed cancer who had BM or stroke. RESULTS: Six hundred and thirteen BM patients were compared with 268 with stroke and cancer. Demographic factors, cancer type, risk factors, clinical presentation, and outcome are presented. Median overall survival in months for those with any stroke was 15 (95%confidence interval [CI] 8.6-21.4)-5 (95%CI 0.12.4) for hemorrhagic stroke and 22 (95%CI 13.4-30.6) in the ischemic group-and for those with BM 12 (95%CI 10.4-13.6). Hemorrhagic stroke commonly found in stroke patients as well as focal motor weakness, aphasia, and altered mental status. BM was more common in breast and lung cancer with headache, visual complaint, and/or vertigo. CONCLUSION: Survival in cancer patients with BM is not that different than those with stroke, but clinical presentation and risk factors were found different.

Sensitive methods for screening of the MEK1 gene mutations in patients with central nervous system metastases of non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: The mitogen-activated protein kinases 1 and 2 (MEK1, MEK2) are fundamental partners in the RAS-RAF-MEK-ERK pathway that is involved in regulation of cell proliferation, differentiation and survival. Downregulation of the MEK cascades has been implicated in acquiring of the malignant phenotype in various cancers. Somatic mutations in MEK1 gene (substitutions K57N, Q56P, D67N) were described in <1 % of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and they were more commonly reported in adenocarcinoma patients with current or former smoking status. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In the following study, we assessed the MEK1 gene mutations in 145 FFPE tissue samples from central nervous system (CNS) metastases of NSCLC using HRM-PCR and ASP-qPCR techniques. The studied group was heterogeneous in terms of histopathology and smoking status. The prevalence of the MEK1 gene mutation was correlated with the occurrence of mutations in KRAS, EGFR, DDR2, PIK3CA, NRAS, HER2, AKT1 and PTEN genes. RESULTS: Using HRM and ASP-qPCR methods we identified one (0.7 %; 1/145) MEK1 substitution (Q56P) in CNS metastases of NSCLC. The mutation was identified in a single, 50-year-old, current smoking men with adenocarcinoma (1.25 %; 1/80 of all adenocarcinomas). CONCLUSIONS: According to the current knowledge, the incidence of MEK1 gene mutation in CNS metastatic lesion of NSCLC is the first such report worldwide. The analysis of gene profile in cancer patients may extend the scope of molecularly targeted therapies used both in patients with primary and metastatic tumors of NSCLC.