[Anorectal melanoma: Clinical case]. / Melanoma anorrectal: un caso clínico.

Background: Anorectal melanoma (AM) is a rare and aggressive type of tumor, with varied and inconclusive scientific information. Its preoperative diagnosis is challenging due to its rarity and similarity to other anorectal conditions. It represents only 1.3% of melanomas and affects more women than men. Approximately 20-30% of AM cases are amelanotic, complicating endoscopic detection and leading to misdiagnoses. AM is often confused with hemorrhoids, polyps, and rectal cancer in two thirds of patients due to similar symptoms. The causes and risk factors of AM are not well understood, but they are suspected to differ from cutaneous and ocular melanomas. Diagnosis is performed through biopsy and immunohistochemical staining. Colonoscopy helps to characterize the lesions, and histological examination is crucial for definitive diagnosis. Clinical case: 50-year-old woman with rectal bleeding and proctalgia. AM was diagnosed through colonoscopy, and transanal resection with hemorrhoidectomy was performed. Conclusions: Management of AM is complicated by the lack of randomized trials. Resection surgery is the standard treatment, but there is no established protocol. Wide local excision may be an option for limited cases. Further research is needed to improve the management and treatment of AM. Early detection and complete surgical removal are crucial for enhancing survival in these patients.

Introducción: el melanoma anorrectal (MA) es un tipo raro y agresivo de tumor, cuya información científica es variada y poco concluyente. Su diagnóstico preoperatorio es un desafío debido a su rareza y a su similitud con otras afecciones anorrectales. Representa solo el 1.3% de los melanomas y afecta más a mujeres que a hombres. Aproximadamente el 20-30% de los casos de MA son amelanóticos, lo que complica su detección endoscópica y conduce a diagnósticos erróneos. El MA se confunde con hemorroides, pólipos y cáncer de recto en dos tercios de los pacientes debido a síntomas similares. Las causas y factores de riesgo del MA aún no se conocen bien, pero se sospecha que son diferentes de los melanomas cutáneos y oculares. El diagnóstico se realiza mediante biopsia y tinción inmunohistoquímica. La colonoscopía permite caracterizar las lesiones y el examen histológico es crucial para el diagnóstico definitivo. Caso clínico: mujer de 50 años con rectorragia y proctalgia. Se diagnosticó MA mediante colonoscopía y se realizó una resección transanal con hemorroidectomía. Conclusiones: el manejo del MA es complicado por la falta de ensayos aleatorizados. La cirugía de resección es el tratamiento habitual, pero no hay un protocolo establecido. La escisión local amplia puede ser una opción para casos limitados. Se necesita más investigación para mejorar el manejo y tratamiento del MA. La detección temprana y la extirpación quirúrgica completa son cruciales para mejorar la supervivencia en estos pacientes.

Racial Disparities in Bowel Preparation and Post-Operative Outcomes in Colorectal Cancer Patients.

BACKGROUND: Combined pre-operative bowel preparation with oral antibiotics (OAB) and mechanical bowel preparation (MBP) is the current recommendation for elective colorectal surgery. Few have studied racial disparities in bowel preparation and subsequent post-operative complications. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used 2015-2021 ACS-NSQIP-targeted data for elective colectomy for colon cancer. Multivariate regression evaluated predictors of post-operative outcomes: post-operative ileus, anastomotic leak, surgical site infection (SSI), operative time, and hospital length of stay (LOS). RESULTS: 72,886 patients were evaluated with 82.1% White, 11.1% Black, and 6.8% Asian or Asian Pacific Islander (AAPI); 4.2% were Hispanic and 51.4% male. Regression accounting for age, sex, ASA classification, comorbidities, and operative approach showed Black, AAPI, and Hispanic patients were more likely to have had no bowel preparation compared to White patients receiving MBP+OAB. Compared to White patients, Black and AAPI patients had higher odds of prolonged LOS and pro-longed operative time. Black patients had higher odds of post-operative ileus. CONCLUSIONS: Racial disparities exist in both bowel preparation administration and post-operative complications despite the method of bowel preparation. This warrants exploration into discriminatory bowel preparation practices and potential differences in the efficacy of bowel preparation in specific populations due to biological or social differences, which may affect outcomes. Our study is limited by its use of a large database that lacks socioeconomic variables and patient data beyond 30 days.

Iatrogenic ureteral injury diagnosed after colon cancer surgery: A case report of a rare and challenging complication.

INTRODUCTION: Iatrogenic ureteral injury (IUI) is an unfortunate and rare complication during colorectal surgery. While IUI remains a rare event, short and long-term complications are life-threatening ranging from intraperitoneal urinoma to septic shock and a serious risk of permanent renal failure. CASE PRESENTATION: An 88-year-old patient was admitted with symptoms of large bowel obstruction and underwent a laparotomy with a discharge colostomy. A week later, a second laparotomy was required for a non-functional retracted stoma, revealing a perforation in a sigmoid tumor. The patient then had an oncological sigmoidectomy with Hartman's colostomy. Postoperative findings indicated a left ureteral injury. Three weeks later, a ureterostomy was performed. Unfortunately, the patient succumbed to heart failure one week after the ureterostomy. DISCUSSION: Low anterior and abdominoperineal resection of the rectum, along with sigmoid resection are the most frequent causes of ureteral injury in digestive surgery. The primary objective of management is to establish a continuous flow of urine to avert potential complications. Preventing IUI in colorectal surgery is of paramount importance. This process initiates in the preoperative phase with a meticulous assessment of ureteral and colic anatomy through comprehensive review of preoperative imaging. CONCLUSION: IUI remains a seldom-seen, and yet a very serious complication in colorectal surgery. It is imperative to prioritize both preoperative and intraoperative measures to prevent IUI, ensuring optimal outcomes. When the diagnosis of a IUI is established, a treatment strategy should be meticulously devised and executed by a skilled and experienced surgeon.

Tolerance to and postoperative outcomes with early oral feeding following elective bowel surgery: a systematic review with meta-analysis

Purpose: Advancements in gastrointestinal surgery have directed attention toward optimizing recovery, including through the use of feeding methods that reduce prolonged postoperative hospital stays, complications, and mortality, among other undesirable outcomes. This study's primary goals were to identify current peer-reviewed literature reporting the postoperative outcomes of elective bowel surgery and to evaluate the clinical evidence of patients' tolerance to oral feeding following elective bowel surgery. Methods: An exhaustive literature search was conducted via PubMed and Scopus. The search results were screened for potential articles, and articles were assessed for eligibility based on prespecified eligibility criteria. The data were synthesized, and the results were reported and discussed thematically. Results: The database search yielded 1,667 articles, from which 18 randomized controlled trials were chosen for inclusion in this study. This study included 874 early oral feeding (EOF) patients, 865 traditional oral feeding patients, and 91 patients whose postoperative care was unspecified. Data synthesis was done, and meta-analyses were conducted. The results showed that EOF patients required a significantly shorter time to tolerate a solid diet and had shorter hospital stays. In addition, bowel function was restored earlier in EOF groups. Conclusion: The results show good tolerance to EOF, shorter hospitalizations, and faster restoration of bowel function, suggesting that EOF after elective bowel surgery is relatively safe. However, further studies with similar baseline conditions should be conducted to verify these results.

Repair of Parastomal Hernias.

Parastomal hernias are an inevitable consequence of ostomy formation and their repairs remain a challenge to many surgeons. With multiple systems of classification and a multitude of techniques for hernia repair ranging from suture to mesh repair, the literature remains sparse with regards to the optimal method of repair. The authors describe the most commonly adopted techniques, discuss preventative measures, and review the current literature in the context of perioperative outcomes and hernia recurrence.

Does surgeon or hospital volume influence outcome in dedicated colorectal units?-A Viennese perspective.

OBJECTIVE: A clear relationship between higher surgeon volume and improved outcomes has not been convincingly established in rectal cancer surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of individual surgeon's caseload and hospital volume on perioperative outcome. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 336 consecutive patients undergoing oncological resection for rectal cancer at two Viennese hospitals between 1 January 2015 and 31 December 2020. The effect of baseline characteristics as well as surgeons' caseloads (low volume: 0-5 cases per year, high volume > 5 cases per year) on postoperative complication rates (Clavien-Dindo Classification groups of < 3 and ≥ 3) were evaluated. RESULTS: No differences in baseline characteristics were found between centers in terms of sex, smoking status, or comorbidities of patients. Interestingly, only 14.7% of surgeons met the criteria to be classified as high-volume surgeons, while accounting for 66.3% of all operations. There was a significant difference in outcomes depending on the treating center in univariate and multivariate binary logistic regression analysis (odds ratio (OR) = 2.403, p = 0.008). Open surgery was associated with lower complication rates than minimally invasive approaches in univariate analysis (OR = 0.417, p = 0.003, 95%CI = 0.232-0.739) but not multivariate analysis. This indicated that the center's policy rather than surgeon volume or mode of surgery impact on postoperative outcomes. CONCLUSION: Treating center standards impacted on outcome, while individual caseload of surgeons or mode of surgery did not independently affect complication rates in this analysis. The majority of rectal cancer resections are performed by a small number of surgeons in Viennese hospitals.

Postoperative Surprises: A Carcinoid Tumor Within a Perforated Meckel's Diverticulum.

Meckel's diverticulum, a true diverticulum originating from the incomplete closure of the vitelline duct during embryologic development, rarely presents with carcinoid tumors. The coexistence of a Meckel's diverticulum and carcinoid tumor following laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy for diverticulitis is an uncommon phenomenon, with limited documented cases in the literature. We present a case of a 74-year-old male with a past medical history of hypertension and diverticulitis who underwent a laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy for dysplastic and cancerous changes of a polyp revealed during a screening colonoscopy. Initially, the patient's postoperative journey was uneventful with the resumption of regular bowel movements and favorable diet progression. However, he later presented to the emergency department for worsening abdominal pain and distension. Imaging prompted surgical intervention due to perforation and obstruction, resulting in the identification of a carcinoid tumor within a perforated Meckel's diverticulum. This case highlights the intricate challenges of postoperative complications, particularly the unexpected emergence of Meckel's diverticulum pathology following a colectomy. The atypical presentation, featuring a carcinoid tumor within a perforated Meckel's diverticulum, underscores the importance of evaluating abdominal symptoms postoperatively.

Evaluation of Short-Term Effects on Colorectal Surgery Elective Patients after Implementing a Patient Blood Management Program: A Multicenter Retrospective Analysis.

Introduction: Patients who undergo surgery may require a blood transfusion and patients undergoing major colorectal surgery are more prone to preoperative and perioperative anemia. Blood transfusions have, however, long been associated with inflammatory and oncological complications. We aim to investigate the effects of an optimal implementation of a patient blood management (PBM) program in our hospital. Methods: This study retrospectively reviewed data from two different prospectively maintained databases of all patients undergoing elective major colorectal surgery with either a laparoscopic, open, or robotic approach from January 2017 to December 2022 at two different high-volume colorectal surgery Italian centers: the Colorectal Surgery Unit of Fondazione Policlinico Campus Bio-Medico in Rome and the Colorectal Surgery Unit of Fondazione Cardinale Panico in Tricase (Lecce). Our study compares the first group, also known as pre-PBM (January 2017-December 2018) and the second group, known as post-PBM (January 2021-December 2022). Results: A total of 2495 patients, who satisfied the inclusion and exclusion criteria, were included in this study, with, respectively, 1197 patients in the pre-PBM group and 1298 in the post- PBM group. The surgical approach was similar amongst the two groups, while the operative time was longer in the pre-PBM group than in the post-PBM group (273.0 ± 87 vs. 215.0 ± 124 min; p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in preparatory Hb levels (p = 0.486), while anemia detection was significantly higher post-PBM (p = 0.007). However, the rate of transfusion was drastically reduced since the implementation of PBM, with p = 0.032 for preoperative, p = 0.025 for intraoperative, and p < 0.001 for postoperative. Conclusions: We confirmed the need to reduce blood transfusions and optimize transfusion procedures to improve short-term clinical outcomes of patients. The implementation of the PBM program was associated with a significant reduction in the rate of perioperative transfusions and an increase in only appropriate transfusions.

Comparison of perioperative outcomes between colorectal operations performed on weekends vs those performed on weekdays.

BACKGROUND: Weekend surgical time is an underused asset. Concerns over a possible weekend effect (substandard care) may be a barrier. METHODS: This study examined whether a weekend effect applies to elective colorectal surgery via a single-center retrospective analysis comparing outcomes between patients who underwent elective colorectal surgery on a weekend vs a weekday. Demographics, length of stay (LOS), operative and anesthesia time, the rate of reoperation within 30 days, and the rate of major complications were compared between patient groups. RESULTS: Of the 2008 patients identified, 1721 (85.7%) underwent surgery on a weekday, and 287 (14.3%) underwent surgery on a weekend. The proportion of operations with an open approach was higher on weekends than weekdays (49.5% vs 41.8%, P = .017). Patients who underwent surgery on the weekend tended to have a shorter mean (SE) for LOS (4.2 [0.2] vs 6.1 [0.2], P < .001), anesthesia time (233.8 [6.5] vs 307.6 [3.3] minutes, P < .001), and operative time (225.4 [6.4] vs. 297.6 [3.3] minutes, P < .001). On multivariable analysis, patients who had an operation on a weekend had a 38% lower chance of having a prolonged LOS (>75th percentile of LOS) compared with those who had an operation on a weekday (adjusted odds ratio = 0.62; 95% CI 0.42-0.92). There were no differences in rates of complications or reoperation for patients undergoing surgery on a weekend compared with a weekday. CONCLUSION: At centers with experienced anesthesiologists, appropriately trained nursing staff, and expert surgeons, colorectal surgery performed on a weekend has similar safety outcomes as surgeries performed on a weekday.

How to compensate for frailty? The real life impact of geriatric co-management on morbi-mortality after colorectal cancer surgery in patients aged 70 years or older.

In Europe, CRC is the second most common cause of cancer death, and surgery remains the mainstay curative treatment. Age and frailty are associated with an increased risk of postoperative morbidity and 1-year mortality. Chronological age is not sufficient to assess the risk of postoperative complications. The CGA has been developed to better identify frail patients. Geriatric co-management have been developed to optimize the post-operative outcomes. We analyzed the real-life of geriatric co-management within an ERAS program on surgical outcomes at 90 days and oncologic outcomes at 1 year in patients aged 70 years or older after surgery for CRC. This was a retrospective study based on a prospective cohort. Fifty-one patients with a G8 score ≤ 14 were referred to geriatricians for preoperative CGA (Frail Group). They were compared with 151 patients with a G8 score ≥ 15 (Robust Group). In the Frail Group, patients were significantly older with more comorbidities than the patients in the Robust Group. Oncologic characteristics, treatments and global post-operative outcomes were comparable between the two groups. One year after surgery mortality and recurrence rates were similar between the two groups. Our study suggests that geriatric co-management is feasible and contributes to the reduction of postoperative morbimortality. Moreover, performing the CGA after G8 score screening and completion of geriatric interventions resulted in similar 90-day postoperative outcomes, in frail patients than in robust patients. Our results confirmed the benefit of geriatric co-management, involving G8 screening, CGA, and ERAS, for frail older patients undergoing surgery for CRC.

Suture reinforcement using a modified cyanoacrylate glue to prevent anastomotic leak in colorectal surgery: a prospective multicentre randomized trial : The Rectal Anastomotic seaL (ReAL) trial.

BACKGROUND: Anastomotic leakage (AL) is the most frequent life-threating complication following colorectal surgery. Several attempts have been made to prevent AL. This prospective, randomized, multicentre trial aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of nebulised modified cyanoacrylate in preventing AL after rectal surgery. METHODS: Patients submitted to colorectal surgery for carcinoma of the high-medium rectum across five high-volume centres between June 2021 and January 2023 entered the study and were randomized into group A (anastomotic reinforcement with cyanoacrylate) and group B (no reinforcement) and followed up for 30 days. Anastomotic reinforcement was performed via nebulisation of 1 mL of a modified cyanoacrylate glue. Preoperative features and intraoperative and postoperative results were recorded and compared. The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (ID number NCT03941938). RESULTS: Out of 152 patients, 133 (control group, n = 72; cyanoacrylate group, n = 61) completed the follow-up. ALs were detected in nine patients (12.5%) in the control group (four grade B and five grade C) and in four patients (6.6%), in the cyanoacrylate group (three grade B and one grade C); however, despite this trend, the differences were not statistically significant (p = 0.36). However, Clavien-Dindo complications grade > 2 were significantly higher in the control group (12.5% vs. 3.3%, p = 0.04). No adverse effects related to the glue application were reported. CONCLUSION: The role of modified cyanoacrylate application in AL prevention remains unclear. However its use to seal colorectal anastomoses is safe and could help to reduce severe postoperative complications.

The impact of anastomotic leakage characteristics on the occurrence of anastomotic stenosis after colorectal resection, a retrospective cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Anastomotic stenosis (AS) is a common complication after colorectal resection. However, the predisposing factors for stricture formation are not fully understood. Previous studies have shown anastomotic leakage (AL) to be a risk factor for the occurrence of AS. Therefore, we aim to investigate the impact of anastomotic leakage characteristics on the occurrence of anastomotic stenosis after colorectal resection. METHODS: Consecutive patients with AL following elective, sphincter preserving, colorectal resection, with or without diversion ostomy, between January 2009 and March 2023 were identified from a prospectively collected database. The characteristics of the anastomotic leakage, patient baseline and operative characteristics as well as the postoperative outcomes were analyzed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression to identify factors associated with the occurrence of post-leakage AS. RESULTS: A total of 129 patients developed AL and met the inclusion criteria. Among these, 28 (21.7%) patients were diagnosed with post-leakage AS. There was a significantly higher frequency of patients with neoadjuvant radiotherapy (18% vs 3%; p = .026) and hand-sewn anastomoses (39% vs 17%; p = .011) within the AS group. Furthermore, the extent of the anastomotic defect was significantly higher in the AS group compared with the non-AS group (50%, IQR 27-71 vs. 20%, IQR 9-40, p = 0.011). Similar findings were observed between the study groups regarding age, sex, BMI, ASA score, medical comorbidities, diagnosis, surgical procedure, surgical approach (open vs. minimally invasive), and anastomotic fashioning (side-to-end vs. end-to-end). On multivariate analysis, the extent of the anastomotic defect (OR 1.01; 95% CI 1.00-1.03; p = 0.034) and hand-sewn anastomoses (OR 2.68; 95% CI 1.01-6.98; p = 0.043) were confirmed as independent risk factors for post-leakage AS. No correlation could be observed between the occurrence of post-leakage AS and the ISREC grading of AL, the anastomotic height or the management of AL. Time to ostomy reversal was significantly longer in the AS group (202d, IQR 169-275 vs. 318d IQR 192-416, p = 0.014). CONCLUSION: The extent of the anastomotic defect and hand-sewn anastomoses were confirmed as independent risk factors for the occurrence of post-leakage AS. No correlation could be observed between the ISREC grading of AL, the anastomotic height or AL management, and the occurrence of post-leakage AS.

Clinical applications of 3D printing in colorectal surgery: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: The utilization of three-dimensional printing has grown rapidly within the field of surgery over recent years. Within the subspecialty of colorectal surgery, the technology has been used to create personalized anatomical models for preoperative planning, models for surgical training, and occasionally customized implantable devices and surgical instruments. We aim to provide a systematic review of the current literature discussing clinical applications of three-dimensional printing in colorectal surgery. METHODS: Full-text studies published in English which described the application of 3D printing in pre-surgical planning, advanced surgical planning, and patient education within the field of colorectal surgery were included. Exclusion criteria were duplicate articles, review papers, studies exclusively dealing with surgical training and/or education, studies which used only virtual models, and studies which described colorectal cancer only as it pertained to other organs. RESULTS: Eighteen studies were included in this review. There were two randomized controlled trials, one retrospective outcomes study, five case reports/series, one animal model, and nine technical notes/feasibility studies. There were three studies on advanced surgical planning/device manufacturing, six on pre-surgical planning, two on pelvic anatomy modeling, eight on various types of anatomy modeling, and one on patient education. CONCLUSIONS: While more studies with a higher level of evidence are needed, the findings of this review suggest many promising applications of three-dimensional printing within the field of colorectal surgery with the potential to improve patient outcomes and experiences.

Pregnancy and stomas: a 9-year retrospective series at a major metropolitan hospital in Brisbane Queensland.

BACKGROUND: Over 42 000 Australians live with a stoma, and this number increases annually. Pregnancy in stoma patients is a rare but complex condition and there is limited published literature regarding surgical and obstetric complications in pregnant stoma patients. The aim of this paper was to review stoma outcomes, perinatal morbidity and mortality, and early postpartum period in pregnant stoma patients. METHODS: Data was retrospectively obtained on women of childbearing age, with a stoma, who had been pregnant and birthed in the last nine years at the Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital between January 2014 to December 2022. Data recorded included patient demographics, type of stoma, indication for stoma, need for additional abdominal surgeries, method of conception, pregnancy complications, length of stay, neonatal outcomes and post pregnancy stomal complications. RESULTS: In total, there were 16 births from 13 mothers with stomas. Of 10 births to IBD patients, 40% experienced a serious stomal complication. Caesarean section (CS) rate was 90% for IBD and 83% for non-IBD. In-vitro fertilisation rates were 40% in IBD patients and 0% in non-IBD patients. The average gestational age at delivery was 36 weeks in IBD and 35 weeks non-IBD patients. Neonates delivered to IBD mothers had a birth weight under 2500g in 40% of cases and in non IBD mothers at 33.3% (p = 0.62). Of the sixteen births there was five complications (31.25%) associated with the stoma either during pregnancy or during the sixty-day postpartum period. CONCLUSION: Pregnancy in stoma patients is a rare occurrence and appears to be associated with high rates of CS, preterm delivery, low birth weight and stomal complication.

Occurrence and prevention of incisional hernia following laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Among minimally invasive surgical procedures, colorectal surgery is associated with a notably higher incidence of incisional hernia (IH), ranging from 1.7% to 24.3%. This complication poses a significant burden on the healthcare system annually, necessitating urgent attention from surgeons. In a study published in the World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Fan et al compared the incidence of IH among 1614 patients who underwent laparoscopic colorectal surgery with different extraction site locations and evaluated the risk factors associated with its occurrence. This editorial analyzes the current risk factors for IH after laparoscopic colorectal surgery, emphasizing the impact of obesity, surgical site infection, and the choice of incision location on its development. Furthermore, we summarize the currently available preventive measures for IH. Given the low surgical repair rate and high recurrence rate associated with IH, prevention deserves greater research and attention compared to treatment.

Successful Preoperative Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt for Portal Decompression in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Cirrhosis Requiring Surgical Intervention.

Background: Colorectal surgery in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and cirrhosis has increased morbidity, which may preclude surgery. Preoperative transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is postulated to reduce surgical risk. In this retrospective single-center study, we characterized perioperative outcomes in patients with IBD and cirrhosis who underwent preoperative TIPS. Methods: We identified patients with IBD and cirrhosis who had undergone preoperative TIPS for portal decompression between 2010 and 2023. All other indications for TIPS led to patient exclusion. Demographic and medical data were collected, including portal pressure measurements. Primary outcome of interest was perioperative outcomes. Results: Ten patients met the inclusion criteria. The most common surgical indications were dysplasia (50%) and refractory IBD (50%). TIPS was performed at a median of 47 days (IQR 34-80) before surgery, with reduction in portal pressures (22.5 vs. 18.5 mmHg, P < .01) and portosystemic gradient (12.5 vs. 5.5 mmHg, P < .01). Perioperative complications occurred in 80% of patients, including surgical site bleeding (30%), wound dehiscence (10%), systemic infection (30%), liver function elevation (50%), and coagulopathy (50%). No patients required re-operation, with median length of stay being 7 days (IQR 5.5-9.3). The 30-day readmission rate was 40%, most commonly for infection (75%), with 2 patients having intra-abdominal abscesses and 1 patient with concern for bowel ischemia. Ninety-day and one-year survival was 100% and 90%, respectively. Patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC)-cirrhosis were noted to have higher perioperative morbidity and a 30-day readmission rate. Conclusions: In patients with IBD and cirrhosis, preoperative TIPS facilitated successful surgical intervention despite heightened risk. Nevertheless, significant complications were noted, in particular for patients with PSC-cirrhosis.

Anastomotic tension "Bridging": a risk factor for anastomotic leakage following low anterior resection.

BACKGROUND: Excessive tension at the anastomosis contributes to anastomotic leakage (AL) in low anterior resection (LAR). However, the specific tension has not been measured. We assessed whether "Bridging," characterized by the proximal colon resembling a suspension bridge above the pelvic floor, is a significant risk factor for AL following LAR for rectal cancer. METHODS: This retrospective study reviewed the medical records and laparoscopic videos of 102 patients who underwent laparoscopic LAR using the double stapling technique at Yachiyo Hospital between January 2014 and December 2023. Patients were classified based on whether they had Bridging (tight or sagging) or were in a Resting state of the proximal colon, and the association between Bridging and AL was examined. RESULTS: AL occurred in 31.3% of the Tight Bridging group, 20% of the Sagging Bridging group, and 2.2% of the Resting group (P = 0.002). The incidence of AL was significantly higher in patients with Bridging than in those without (23.2% vs. 2.2%, P = 0.003). Multivariate analysis revealed that Bridging is an independent risk factor for AL (odds ratio = 6.97; 95% confidence interval: 1.45-33.6; P = 0.016). CONCLUSIONS: The presence of Bridging is a significant risk factor for AL following LAR for rectal cancer, suggesting the need for implementing preventive measures in patients with this condition.

Major colorectal surgery with Hugo™ RAS: initial experience of a German center and a review of the literature.

The recently introduced Hugo RAS robotic platform has mostly been used for well standardized urologic and gynaecologic procedures. Experience with this new system in general surgery and especially in major colorectal surgery is very limited. This is a retrospective series of the first 25 consecutive non-selected colorectal surgeries performed at a single German center. The lessons learned from our initial experience are presented along with a systematic review of the currently available literature on this topic. Ten sigmoid and seven rectal resections, four right and one left hemicolectomies, two Hartmann's reversals and an abdominoperineal resection were performed in 14 women and 11 men at the median age of 66 years for 12 benign findings and 13 malignancies. All procedures were performed using four robotic ports and a single 12 mm assistant port. Median docking, console and total operative times were 12, 170 and 270 min. Median blood loss was < 100 ml, and median stay was 8 days. The literature review identified five case series with a total of 23 colorectal procedures: 9 right and 1 left hemicolectomies, 5 ileocaecal, and 4 rectal and 4 sigmoid resections. Results corresponded to ours despite variations in setup used by different authors. A wide spectrum of major colorectal surgery can be safely and effectively performed with the Hugo RAS, even in a cohort of non-selected patients. Ongoing software and hardware upgrade, introduction of robotic energy devices and increasing surgical experience are expected to facilitate procedures and reduce duration of surgery.

Preoperative electroacupuncture versus sham electroacupuncture for the treatment of postoperative ileus after laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in China: a study protocol for a multicentre, randomised, sham-controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Postoperative ileus (POI) is a postoperative complication that can cause lingering recovery after colorectal resection and a heavy healthcare system burden. Acupuncture aims to prevent postoperative complications, reduce the duration of POI, help recovery and shorten hospital stays. We hypothesise that preoperative electroacupuncture (EA) can promote POI recovery under the enhanced recovery after surgery protocol after laparoscopic surgery in patients with POI. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a multicentre, randomised, sham-controlled trial. A total of 80 patients will be enrolled and randomly assigned to the EA or sham electroacupuncture (SA) group. The eligible patients will receive EA or SA for one session per day with treatment frequency starting on preoperative day 1 for four consecutive days. The primary outcome is the time to first defecation. The secondary outcomes include the time to first flatus, length of postoperative hospital stay, time to tolerability of semiliquid and solid food, postoperative nausea, vomiting, pain and extent of abdominal distention, time to first ambulation, preoperative anxiety, 30-day readmission rate, the usage of anaesthetics and analgesics during operation, length of postanaesthesia care unit stay. A mechanistic study by single-cell RNA sequencing in which postintervention normal intestinal tissue samples will be collected. The results of this study will provide evidence of the effects of acupuncture on POI and promote good clinical decision to millions of patients globally every year. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has been approved by the ethical application of Beijing University of Chinese Medicine (2022BZYLL0401), Beijing Friendship Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University(2022-P2-368-02), Cancer Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Science (23/175-3917), Huanxing Cancer Hospital (2023-002-02). The results will be published in a medical journal. In addition, we plan to present them at scientific conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR2300077633.

Real-world assessment of longitudinal opioid use and healthcare resource utilization in patients undergoing colorectal resection.

Liposomal bupivacaine (LB) has been used in multimodal pain management regimens to improve postsurgical analgesia. This retrospective cohort analysis assessed clinical and economic outcomes of LB vs non-LB analgesia in minimally invasive colorectal resection surgery using real-world patient data from the IQVIA linkage claims databases. Patients who received LB were 1:1 matched to patients who did not receive LB (non-LB) via propensity scores. Outcomes included opioid use during the perioperative (2 weeks before surgery to 2 weeks after discharge), continued (>2 weeks to 3 months after discharge), and persistent (>3 months to 6 months after discharge) periods and healthcare resource utilization (HRU) during the first 3 months after discharge. Mean opioid consumption was lower in the LB (n = 4397) versus non-LB (n = 4397) cohort perioperatively (483 vs 538 morphine milligram equivalents [MMEs]; P = 0.001) and after discharge within ∼3 months (222 vs 328 MMEs; P < 0.0001) and 3-6 months (245 vs 384 MMEs; P < 0.0001). The LB cohort had shorter mean length of stay (5.2 vs 5.7 days; P < 0.0001) and fewer inpatient readmissions (odds ratio [OR], 0.71; P < 0.0001), emergency department visits (OR, 0.78; P < 0.0001), and outpatient/office visits (OR, 0.91; P = 0.028) than the non-LB cohort 3 months after discharge. These data suggest use of LB in minimally invasive colorectal resection surgery may reduce perioperative and postdischarge opioid use as well as HRU. Although additional studies are needed to confirm these findings, this analysis provides valuable real-world data from large claims databases to evaluate clinical and economic outcomes that complement other types of retrospective and prospective studies.