Clinical and in vitro application of robotic computer-assisted implant surgery: a scoping review.

In recent years, the emergence and application of robotic computer-assisted implant surgery (r-CAIS) has resulted in a revolutionary shift in conventional implant diagnosis and treatment. This scoping review was performed to verify the null hypothesis that r-CAIS has a relatively high accuracy of within 1 mm, with relatively few complications and a short operative time. This review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). From the 3355 publications identified in the PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases, 28 were finally included after a comprehensive review and analysis. The null hypothesis is partly accepted, as r-CAIS has a relatively high accuracy (coronal and apical deviation within 1 mm), and no significant adverse events or complications have been reported to date, although additional confirmatory studies are needed. However, there is insufficient evidence for a shorter surgical time, and further clinical research on this topic is required.

Novel use of dynamic navigation for guiding a piezoelectric device during window osteotomy for maxillary sinus floor elevation in complex clinical scenarios.

In patients with severe atrophy of the posterior maxilla requiring lateral maxillary sinus floor elevation (MSFE), the window location and size are commonly designed according to the future implants and anatomical conditions. A window osteotomy becomes challenging when there is an extended edentulous space in the maxilla with no reference from the natural dentition, or when the surgical site involves anatomical variations, for example in the course of a large vessel or a sinus septum. Through preoperative planning and real-time visualization, the application of dynamic navigation allows an accurate location, optimal dimension, and customized shape during lateral window osteotomy. This article introduces a digital protocol for ensuring an accurate and safe window osteotomy for MSFE in complex clinical scenarios, by integrating dynamic navigation and a piezoelectric device.

Accuracy of robotic arm-assisted versus computed tomography-based navigation in total hip arthroplasty using the direct anterior approach: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: A robotic arm-assisted and a computed tomography (CT)- based navigation system have been reported to improve the accuracy of component positioning in total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, no study has compared robotic arm-assisted THA (rTHA) to CT-based navigated THA (nTHA) concerning accuracy of cup placement and acetabular fractures using the direct anterior approach (DAA). This study aimed to compare the accuracy of cup placement and the presence of intraoperative acetabular fractures between rTHA and nTHA using DAA in the supine position. METHODS: We retrospectively investigated 209 hips of 188 patients who underwent rTHA or nTHA using DAA (rTHA using the Mako system: 85 hips of 79 patients; nTHA: 124 hips of 109 patients). After propensity score matching for age and sex, each group consisted of 73 hips. We evaluated clinical and radiographic outcomes, comparing postoperative cup orientation and position, measured using a three-dimensional templating software, to preoperative CT planning. Additionally, we investigated the prevalence of occult acetabular fracture. RESULTS: Clinical outcomes were not significantly different between the groups at 1 year postoperatively. The mean absolute error of cup orientation was significantly smaller in the rTHA group than in nTHA (inclination: 1.4° ± 1.2° vs. 2.7° ± 2.2°, respectively; p = 0.0001, anteversion: 1.5° ± 1.3° vs. 2.2° ± 1.7°, respectively; p = 0.007). The cases within an absolute error of 5 degrees in both RI and RA were significantly higher in the rTHA (97.3%) than in nTHA group (82.2%) (p = 0.003). The absolute error of the cup position was not significantly different between the two groups. The prevalence of occult acetabular fracture did not differ significantly between the two groups (rTHA: n = 0 [0%] vs. nTHA: n = 1 [1.4%]). CONCLUSION: Cup placement using DAA in the supine position in rTHA was more accurate with fewer outliers compared to nTHA. Therefore, rTHA performed via DAA in a supine position would be useful for accurate cup placement.

New dimensions in alveolar fracture treatment: Open reduction and internal fixation by minimally invasive approach combined with computer-assisted surgery.

Alveolar fractures are a common type of maxillofacial trauma, and the conventional treatment involves closed reduction and dental splinting fixation. However, closed treatment is not suitable for some complex segmental alveolar fractures. In this case report, we introduce an innovative method for segmental alveolar fracture by using open reduction and internal fixation by minimally invasive approach combined with computer-assisted surgery. In this case, the new dimensions in the treatment followed AO principles of fracture management, achieving anatomical reduction of the fracture, absolute stability of the fracture ends, proper preservation of vascular supply to soft tissues and bone, and promoting recovery through early postoperative functional training. This case provides new insights into the treatment of the complex segmental alveolar fractures with tenuous vascular supply and cannot be treated by conventional splinting fixation.

Accuracy of Implant Guided Surgery in Fully Edentulous Patients: Prediction vs. Actual Outcome-Systematic Review.

Objectives: Examine deviations between the digitally planned and actual implant positions in clinical studies using static fully guided surgical guides. Identify potential associated factors and strategies to minimize their likelihood. Materials and Methods: This systematic review was conducted following the PRISMA checklist. The literature search was conducted in the PubMed® and Scopus® databases up to February 2024 following the PICOS search strategy. Clinical trials conducted between 2013 and 2024, evaluating the accuracy of static fully guided surgical guides placed in fully edentulous patients, were included. The studies had to assess at least two of the following parameters: angular deviation, cervical deviation, apical deviation, and depth deviation. Results: Out of the 298 articles initially searched, six randomized clinical trials and three clinical trials were included. All but one article used mucosa-supported guides; the remaining one used bone-supported guides. Apical deviations were more significant than cervical deviations, and implants tended to be placed too superficially. The greatest mean deviations were 2.01 ± 0.77 mm for cervical and 2.41 ± 1.45 mm for apical deviations, with the largest angular deviation recorded at 4.98 ± 2.16°. Conclusions: The accuracy of the surgical guide is influenced by various factors, including the technique of image acquisition and subsequent planning, guide support methods, and the adopted surgical protocol. Apical deviations are influenced by cervical and angular deviations. Additionally, deviations were more pronounced in the mandible. Further studies with similar methodologies are necessary for a more precise assessment of the different factors and for establishing safety margins.

Sacroiliac joint fusion guided by intraoperatively superimposed virtual surgical planning using simulated fluoroscopic images.

Introduction: Sacroiliac joint fusion (SIJF) is a minimally invasive treatment for sacroiliac (SI) dysfunction. It involves placing implants through the SI joint under fluoroscopic guidance, requiring precise implant positioning to avoid nerve injury. Preoperative virtual surgical planning (VSP) aids in optimal positioning, but replicating it accurately in the operating room is challenging. Research question: This study aims to assess the feasibility of superimposing VSP onto intraoperative fluoroscopic images to aid in optimal implant placement. Material and methods: A method for intraoperative guidance using 3D/2D registration was developed and tested during SIJF as an available and potentially efficient alternative for costly and more invasive navigation systems. Preoperatively, a VSP is performed and simulated fluoroscopic images are generated from a preoperative CT scan. During surgery, the simulated image that visually best matches the intraoperative fluoroscopic image is selected. Subsequently, the VSP is superimposed onto the intraoperative fluoroscopic image using a developed script-based workflow. The surgeon then places the implants accordingly. Postoperative implant placement accuracy was evaluated. Results: Five interventions were performed on five patients, resulting in a total of 15 placed implants. Minor complications without clinical consequences occurred in one case, primarily attributable to the patient's anatomy and pathological manifestations. Mean deviations at implant apex and 3D angle were 4.7 ± 1.6 mm and 3.5 ± 1.3°, respectively. Discussion and conclusions: The developed intraoperative workflow was feasible and resulted in implants placed with low deviations from the VSP. Further research is needed to automate and validate this method in a larger cohort.

The Accuracy of Dental Implant Placement With Different Methods of Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery: A Network Meta-Analysis of Clinical Studies.

OBJECTIVE: Computer-assisted implant surgery (CAIS) has been introduced as a tool to aid in reaching a more accurate implant position. The aim of this network meta-analysis was to compare all the available CAIS techniques and obtain collective evidence on the method that offers the highest accuracy compared to freehand implant placement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Database search was done in PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane library in addition to extensive search in the gray literature and related systematic reviews, aiming to find clinical studies that compared any CAIS technique with another, or with freehand implant placement. The outcomes evaluated were angle, platform, and apex deviation. The search process ended on March 18, 2024. RESULTS: Thirty-three studies were included. All CAIS techniques (static with partial or full guidance, dynamic with partial or full guidance, the combination of static and dynamic CAIS) showed significantly less deviation than freehand implant placement, except for the static CAIS with guidance for the pilot drill only. The combination of static and dynamic CAIS ranked best among all other methods. Based on the GRADE system, the certainty of evidence in the outcomes of the meta-analysis was judged as low or moderate. CONCLUSIONS: The current study demonstrates that computer-assisted implant surgery provides significantly higher accuracy in implant placement, with the combination of static and dynamic CAIS being the most precise. Nevertheless, future studies are needed, considering the different types, locations, and extents of edentulism in the analyzed investigations, as well as the necessity of obtaining stronger evidence. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERIO number: CRD42023482030.

PSI: Planner-specific, physician-specific, or patient-specific implant for orbital reconstruction?

This study aimed to identify and quantify the variations in PSI designs intended for an identical patient. Records from 10 patients with an orbital fracture involving two walls, for which a primary orbital reconstruction was indicated, were retrospectively included. Clinical engineers from two centers independently generated proposal designs for all patients. Following web meeting(s) with the surgeon from the same institute, the PSI designs were finalized by the engineer. A cross-over of the engineer with the surgeon of the other center created two new design teams. In total, 20 proposal and 40 final PSI designs were produced. A three-dimensional comparison between different PSI designs for the same patient was performed by computing a difference score. Initially, the design proposals of the two engineers showed a median difference score of 37%, which was significantly reduced to a median difference score of 26% for the final designs with different engineers. The median difference score of 22% between surgeons demonstrated that both parties introduced notable user variations to the final designs. Evidence supporting the advantages of an experienced design team was found, with significantly fewer modifications, fewer meetings, and less time required to complete the design (up to 40% time reduction). The findings of the study underline the dependency of PSI design on the surgeon and engineer, and support the need for a more evidence-based protocol for PSI design.

Autonomous countertraction for secure field of view in laparoscopic surgery using deep reinforcement learning.

PURPOSE: Countertraction is a vital technique in laparoscopic surgery, stretching the tissue surface for incision and dissection. Due to the technical challenges and frequency of countertraction, autonomous countertraction has the potential to significantly reduce surgeons' workload. Despite several methods proposed for automation, achieving optimal tissue visibility and tension for incision remains unrealized. Therefore, we propose a method for autonomous countertraction that enhances tissue surface planarity and visibility. METHODS: We constructed a neural network that integrates a point cloud convolutional neural network (CNN) with a deep reinforcement learning (RL) model. This network continuously controls the forceps position based on the surface shape observed by a camera and the forceps position. RL is conducted in a physical simulation environment, with verification experiments performed in both simulation and phantom environments. The evaluation was performed based on plane error, representing the average distance between the tissue surface and its least-squares plane, and angle error, indicating the angle between the tissue surface vector and the camera's optical axis vector. RESULTS: The plane error decreased under all conditions both simulation and phantom environments, with 93.3% of case showing a reduction in angle error. In simulations, the plane error decreased from 3.6 ± 1.5 mm to 1.1 ± 1.8 mm , and the angle error from 29 ± 19 ∘ to 14 ± 13 ∘ . In the phantom environment, the plane error decreased from 0.96 ± 0.24 mm to 0.39 ± 0.23 mm , and the angle error from 32 ± 29 ∘ to 17 ± 20 ∘ . CONCLUSION: The proposed neural network was validated in both simulation and phantom experimental settings, confirming that traction control improved tissue planarity and visibility. These results demonstrate the feasibility of automating countertraction using the proposed model.

Effect of Storage Conditions and Time on the Dimensional Stability of 3D Printed Surgical Guides: An In Vitro Study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the dimensional stability over time of additively manufactured surgical templates, fabricated by different resins, and stored by different methods. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using a 3D printer with DLS technology and two different resins (Surgical Guide (SG)-WhipMix and Key Guide (KG)-KeystoneIndustries), 96 surgical guides were additively manufactured. The guides were stored in three different environments: directly exposed to sunlight (S1), in normal interior room conditions (S2), and in darkness (S3). The guides were digitally scanned immediately after fabrication and post-processing, and after 1, 3, and 6 months of storage. For each group, the mean deviation of the root mean square (RMS) between guide's intaglio surface, as well as the axial deviation between sleeves' housings were calculated. RESULTS: The mean axial variations of angular axis deviation of sleeves' housings ranged between 0.09° and 3.99°. The mean deviation of the RMS discrepancy in guide's intaglio ranged from 0.1 to 0.18 mm. Variations were significant (p < 0.001) only for the S1 group and only for SG material. After 3 months, an additional storage time of 3 months did not have any further effect on dimensional stability. CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitations of the present study, storage time of a surgical guide for up to 3 months after manufacturing, as well as printing material can significantly affect surgical guide's dimensional stability, when they are exposed to direct or indirect sunlight conditions. Storage of guides in a dark environment is recommended in order to avoid an additional source of error in computer-guided surgery workflows.

Accelerometer-based portable navigation system shows no superior accuracy over pelvic alignment guide for acetabular cup placement in total hip arthroplasty in lateral decubitus position.

BACKGROUND: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) using a portable navigation system (PNS) incurs costs per procedure. However, it does not require a large console. This study aimed to compare the accuracy of acetabular cup placement using a pelvic alignment guide (PAG) attached to the pelvis and an accelerometer-based PNS in THA performed in the lateral decubitus position. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 100 hips that underwent primary THA in the lateral decubitus position between July 2018 and January 2021. The PAG was used in 50 hips, whereas the PNS was used in the other 50. Cup placement accuracy was measured using postoperative computed tomography scans, comparing errors in inclination and anteversion angles. The surgical time, blood loss, and complications were recorded. The follow-up period was at least 2 years in all cases. RESULTS: The mean absolute error of the inclination angle was similar between the groups (the PAG group: 3.7° ± 2.3° [range, 0.0-9.0]; the PNS group: 3.7° ± 2.3° [range, 0.2-10.5], p = 0.705). The mean absolute error of the anteversion angle was significantly smaller in the PAG group than in the PNS group (3.0° ± 2.4° [range, 0.0-9.7] vs. 6.5° ± 4.8° [range, 0.3-17.3], p < 0.001). The PAG group had a higher proportion of hips within 5° and 10° of the target angle (64 vs. 42%, P = 0.028, and 100 vs. 74%, p < 0.001, respectively). The PNS group had six hips with anteversion errors of 15° or more. Surgical time and blood loss were lower in the PAG group. The PNS group had one dislocation, whereas the PAG group did not. CONCLUSION: The accelerometer-based PNS did not demonstrate superior cup alignment accuracy compared to the PAG in THA performed in the lateral decubitus position. This finding informs surgeons that computer-assisted surgery is not necessarily superior to conventional THA using a PAG.

Virtual surgical planning in tripod zygomatico-maxillary complex fractures: A prospective comparison between two different strategies.

Multifragmentary and displaced zygomaticomaxillary complex (ZMC) fractures are often a challenge for the maxillofacial surgeon. The aim of this study was to evaluate the improved performance in the management of patients with tripod fracture of the orbito-zygomaticomaxillary complex, using two different methods of virtual surgical planning - virtual reduction and mirroring - compared with traditional management. A cohort of 60 patients was selected and divided into three groups, each consisting of 20 individuals. Patients in the first group were managed using the virtual reduction method, those in the second group using the mirroring method, and those in the third group using a traditional surgical approach. Having achieved virtual fracture reduction, a stereolithographic model was printed, on which preplating of the plates was performed. The results showed that virtual reduction was the most accurate in absolute terms, with a mean discrepancy in juxtaposition of the preoperative and postoperative CT images of 0.175 mm (SD ± 0.147), compared with 0.403 (SD ± 0.166) for the mirror method (and traditional method (0.875, SD ± 0.112; p > 0.0001). The average surgical time for virtual reduction (89.5 min) was faster than for mirroring (94.25 min) and for the traditional approach (96.75 min). In conclusion, the use of virtual surgical planning allows greater intraoperative accuracy, reduced surgical time, and reduced postoperative complications compared with traditional surgery. Of the two methods, virtual reduction performed best for the outcomes decribed.

A Novel Technique for Restricted Kinematic Alignment Total Knee Arthroplasty Without Computer-Assisted Devices.

Kinematic-alignment total knee arthroplasty (KA-TKA) aims to restore natural limb alignment and joint line obliquity, thereby improving patient satisfaction. Restricted KA-TKA (rKA-TKA) addresses abnormal knee anatomies and seeks to replicate natural anatomical structures within safe alignment boundaries. This study introduces a novel device and technique that enables rKA-TKA without computer-assisted surgery (CAS). The new device allows for precise cartilage thickness measurement and adjustment of osteotomy angles, facilitating accurate alignment. A heel-lift technique for tibial osteotomy is presented, offering a reproducible method for determining the osteotomy volume and angle. These innovations make KA and rKA-TKA feasible in any surgical setting, avoiding the high costs and limited availability associated with CAS.

Accuracy of robotic computer-assisted implant surgery for immediate implant placement: A retrospective case series study.

OBJECTIVES: This study investigated the accuracy of robotic computer-assisted implant surgery (r-CAIS) for immediate implant placement. METHODS: Twenty cases with 20 implant sites were selected based on predefined inclusion criteria. The preparation of the implant bed and implant placement followed the standardized dental implant robotic surgery protocol. Postoperative cone-beam computed tomography scans were conducted to assess possible discrepancies between actual and planned implant positions. RESULTS: The r-CAIS technology for immediate implant placement exhibited a mean global coronal deviation of 0.71 ± 0.27 mm (95% CI: 0.58-0.83 mm), a mean global apical deviation of 0.69 ± 0.26 mm (95% CI: 0.56-0.81 mm), and an angular deviation of 1.27 ± 0.47° (95% CI: 1.05-1.49°). A substantial number of deviations were observed buccally at both coronal (90%) and apical (95%) levels, with a consistent tendency for buccal deviation. CONCLUSIONS: The r-CAIS technology proved a promising approach for immediate implantation in the anterior region, with satisfactory clinical outcomes. However, an optimized surgical protocol for r-CAIS technology is required for particular implant sites like extraction sockets or bone defects.

Accuracy of dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery in fully edentulous patients: An in vitro study.

OBJECTIVES: To compare miniscrew versus bone tracing registration methods on dental implant placement accuracy and time efficiency in edentulous jaws using a dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery (d-CAIS) system. METHODS: Twelve fully edentulous maxillary models were allocated into two groups: miniscrew tracing (MST) group, where registration was performed by tracing four miniscrews; and bone tracing (BT) group, where registration was conducted by tracing maxillary bone fiducial landmarks. Six implants were placed on each model using the X-Guide® d-CAIS system. Pre- and postoperative cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans were superimposed to evaluate implant placement accuracy. The time required for registration and the overall surgery time were also recorded. RESULTS: Thirty-six implants were placed in each group. The MST group showed significantly lower mean angulation deviations (mean difference (MD): -3.33°; 95 % confidence interval (CI): -6.56 to -0.09); p = 0.044), 3D platform deviations (MD: -1.01 mm; 95 % CI: -1.74 to -0.29; p = 0.006), 2D platform deviations (MD: -0.97 mm; 95 % CI: -1.71 to -0.23; p = 0.010), and 3D apex deviations (MD: -1.18 mm; 95 % CI: -1.92 to -0.44; p = 0.002) versus the BT group. The overall surgery time was similar for both groups (MD: 6.10 min.; 95 % CI: -0.31 to 12.51; p = 0.06), though bone tracing required significantly more time compared with miniscrew registration (MD: 4.79 min.; 95 % CI: 2.96 to 6.62; p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Registration with MST increases the accuracy of implant placement with a d-CAIS system in edentulous jaws compared with the BT method, and slightly reduces the overall surgery time. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Miniscrew tracing registration improves implant placement accuracy in comparison with bone tracing registration.

Craniomaxillofacial landmarks detection in CT scans with limited labeled data via semi-supervised learning.

Background: Three-dimensional cephalometric analysis is crucial in craniomaxillofacial assessment, with landmarks detection in craniomaxillofacial (CMF) CT scans being a key component. However, creating robust deep learning models for this task typically requires extensive CMF CT datasets annotated by experienced medical professionals, a process that is time-consuming and labor-intensive. Conversely, acquiring large volume of unlabeled CMF CT data is relatively straightforward. Thus, semi-supervised learning (SSL), leveraging limited labeled data supplemented by sufficient unlabeled dataset, could be a viable solution to this challenge. Method: We developed an SSL model, named CephaloMatch, based on a strong-weak perturbation consistency framework. The proposed SSL model incorporates a head position rectification technique through coarse detection to enhance consistency between labeled and unlabeled datasets and a multilayers perturbation method which is employed to expand the perturbation space. The proposed SSL model was assessed using 362 CMF CT scans, divided into a training set (60 scans), a validation set (14 scans), and an unlabeled set (288 scans). Result: The proposed SSL model attained a detection error of 1.60 ± 0.87 mm, significantly surpassing the performance of conventional fully supervised learning model (1.94 ± 1.12 mm). Notably, the proposed SSL model achieved equivalent detection accuracy (1.91 ± 1.00 mm) with only half the labeled dataset, compared to the fully supervised learning model. Conclusions: The proposed SSL model demonstrated exceptional performance in landmarks detection using a limited labeled CMF CT dataset, significantly reducing the workload of medical professionals and enhances the accuracy of 3D cephalometric analysis.

Undifferentiated embryonal sarcoma of the liver in children: our experience in four difficult cases and three-dimensional practical exploration.

AIMS: To explore rare and difficult cases of undifferentiated embryonal sarcoma of the liver (UESL) in children in a single centre, summarize the diagnosis and treatment experience and analyse the role of a computer-assisted surgery system (Hisense CAS), thus providing a new global vision and three-dimensional perspective. METHODS: We retrospectively collected the clinical data including the diagnoses and treatment processes, of children with UESL confirmed by histopathological examination in our hospital from January 2009 to December 2020. The relationship between the tumour volume and important blood vessels and between the liver volume and tumour volume, as well as other three-dimensional characteristics in the reconstructed three-dimensional model were analysed using Hisense CAS. The findings from this analysis can be used to aid in surgical decision-making and preoperative planning. RESULTS: Four children-3 girls and 1 boy-with UESL were included in the study. The age at onset ranged from 6 to 8 years. All four children presented with symptoms of abdominal discomfort, and abdominal masses were detected during physical examination. Owing to the wishes of their parents and the possibility that the disease was benign, all four children underwent one-stage radical surgery. For patient 1, a three-dimensional reconstruction was created during the initial diagnosis, which made accurate evaluation and planning of the preoperative procedure challenging. In patient 2, the tumour was located in the middle lobe of the liver and involved the first and second hepatic hilum. For patient 3, the pathological diagnosis of the tumour after surgery was challenging, but eventually, the diagnosis was confirmed through histochemistry and consultation with higher-level hospitals. Patient 4 had a giant tumour, which had a preoperative simulated future liver remnant volume (FLV) that was 21.0% of the total volume of the liver and tumour (TLTV). According to the standard liver volume (SLV) for children, the FLV was 77.0% of the SLV, making surgery feasible. All four children underwent complete resection, and only patient 4 experienced recurrence below the diaphragm 19 months after surgery. Currently, the 3-year overall survival rate is 100%, and the 3-year event-free survival rate is 75%. CONCLUSION: UESL in children is rare, and the key to diagnosis and treatment is complete surgical resection. Through individualized three-dimensional surgical planning, accurate and complete resection of difficult and complex UESL in children can be achieved, leading to a favourable prognosis.

Guided versus non-guided chin repositioning: a retrospective study on accuracy.

Genioplasty is a widely used surgical approach to address chin deformities by performing an osteotomy on the inferior border of the mandible to allow for comprehensive repositioning of the chin. This study aimed to compare the accuracy of freehand chin repositioning with a guided technique that employed specialised surgical guides. For this retrospective study, data from 30 adult patients who underwent orthognathic surgery to correct dentofacial deformities were analysed. All patients underwent virtual planning before surgery, with half of them treated using freehand chin repositioning and the other half using the guided technique. The surgical outcomes were measured and compared with the virtual plan to assess the positional and rotational accuracy of the techniques. In terms of translational assessment, noteworthy values that exceeded clinically acceptable limits were observed only in sagittal movement in the freehand group (0.97 mm, interquartile range (IQR) 0.73-2.29 mm). Regarding rotational accuracy, both groups exhibited an IQR that surpassed acceptable limits for pitch (3.26°, IQR 2.06-5.20 for the guided group and 2.57°, IQR 1.63-4.24° for the freehand group). The Mann-Whitney test indicated no statistical differences between the groups in any translational or rotational assessment. In conclusion, although there was no statistical difference, the guided technique proved effective in achieving clinically acceptable accuracy in all positions and almost all rotations, displaying superior results in sagittal positioning compared with the freehand technique. To fully harness the advantages of guides and to guarantee accuracy in all rotations, we recommend further research involving guides made of more rigid materials, and customised implants.

Comparative study on three-dimensional versus two-dimensional imaging using a computer-assisted surgery system for preoperative planning in pediatric middle hepatic tumors.

BACKGROUD: The study objective was to compare three-dimensional and two-dimensional imaging using computer-assisted systems (CASs) in clinical guidance for preoperative surgical planning for middle hepatic tumors in children. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on 23 children who underwent surgery for middle hepatic tumors in our hospital from January 2016 to June 2022. The surgical resection plan was formulated by the operator team using two-dimensional CT images before the operation. Then, the same qualified surgeons conducted an in-depth analysis and formulated the surgical resection scheme for the same pediatric patient using three-dimensional imaging of the middle hepatic tumor. The feasibility of the two schemes was compared and analyzed. RESULT: All the tumors were successfully removed according to the preoperative method developed using three-dimensional imaging. The postoperative short-term follow-up revealed that all patients were doing well. Preoperative plans were revised in 9 cases after evaluating the three-dimensional images due to the disparity between the original plans and the three-dimensional relationship between the tumor and blood vessels, vascular variation, and the volume of remnant liver. CONCLUSIONS: Three-dimensional imaging with a computer-assisted surgery system is superior to two-dimensional imaging in the preoperative planning of pediatric hepatoblastoma.

Applications and accuracy of 3D-printed surgical guides in traumatology and orthopaedic surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Patient-Specific Surgical Guides (PSSGs) are advocated for reducing radiation exposure, operation time and enhancing precision in surgery. However, existing accuracy assessments are limited to specific surgeries, leaving uncertainties about variations in accuracy across different anatomical sites, three-dimensional (3D) printing technologies and manufacturers (traditional vs. printed at the point of care). This study aimed to evaluate PSSGs accuracy in traumatology and orthopaedic surgery, considering anatomical regions, printing methods and manufacturers. Methods: A systematic review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. Studies were eligible if they (1) assessed the accuracy of PSSGs by comparing preoperative planning and postoperative results in at least two different planes (2) used either computer tomography or magnetic resonance imaging (3) covered the field of orthopaedic surgery or traumatology and (4) were available in English or German language. The 'Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies' was used for methodological quality assessment. Descriptive statistics, including mean, standard deviation, and ranges, are presented. A random effects meta-analysis was performed to determine the pooled mean absolute deviation between preoperative plan and postoperative result for each anatomic region (shoulder, hip, spine, and knee). Results: Of 4212 initially eligible studies, 33 were included in the final analysis (8 for shoulder, 5 for hip, 5 for spine, 14 for knee and 1 for trauma). Pooled mean deviation (95% confidence interval) for total knee arthroplasty (TKA), total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA), total hip arthroplasty (THA) and spine surgery (pedicle screw placement during spondylodesis) were 1.82° (1.48, 2.15), 2.52° (1.9, 3.13), 3.49° (3.04, 3.93) and 2.67° (1.64, 3.69), respectively. Accuracy varied between TKA and THA and between TKA and TSA. Conclusion: Accuracy of PSSGs depends on the type of surgery but averages around 2-3° deviation from the plan. The use of PSSGs might be considered for selected complex cases. Level of Evidence: Level 3 (meta-analysis including Level 3 studies).