Efficacy and safety of digital cholangioscopy-assisted non-radiation endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for common bile duct stones / 中华消化内镜杂志

Objective:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of digital cholangioscopy-assisted non-radiation endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for common bile duct stones.Methods:Clinical data of patients who underwent digital cholangioscopy-assisted non-radiation ERCP for common bile duct stones from May 2019 to September 2021 were reviewed. The baseline data, the success rate of cannulation, the one-time success rate of endoscopic stone removal, the operation time, total hospital stay, complications, and recurrence of bile duct stones were analyzed.Results:A total of 170 patients were included, and bile duct stones were detected in 156 (91.8%) patients with the long diameter of 7.7±4.1 mm under preoperative imaging examination. Bile duct stones were detected under choledochoscopy and were successfully removed by using digital cholangioscopy through non-radiation ERCP. The success rate of cannulation was 100.0% (170/170) . The one-time success rate of endoscopic stone removal was 96.5% (164/170), and 6 patients (3.5%) received secondary stone removal for large stones (long diameter>30 mm).The time of biliary exploration and whole non-radiation ERCP were 9.6±2.7 min (6-24 min) and 35.9±17.3 min (13-85 min), respectively. The total hospital stay was 6.3±2.2 days (5-10 days). Postoperative pancreatitis occurred in 3 patients (1.8%), all of whom were mild and resolved after symptomatic treatment. No recurrence of bile duct stones was seen in any patient over 1-month postoperative follow-up.Conclusion:Digital cholangioscopy-assisted non-radiation ERCP is safe and effective for common bile duct stones without ray exposure, which is worth of promotion.

Various innovative roles for 3-Fr microcatheters in pancreaticobiliary endoscopy.

With the development of newer devices and technical innovations, pancreaticobiliary endoscopy is expanding to assume more advanced therapeutic roles. As with other devices, slimmed-down "3-Fr microcatheters" are considered to be opening new windows toward entirely new therapeutic techniques for various purposes. Our practical experience with a total of 34 consecutive patients in whom 3-Fr microcatheters were applied during pancreaticobiliary endoscopic procedures clarified the potential roles of this instrument in pancreaticobiliary endoscopy. The major benefits of 3-Fr microcatheters involve their slimness and flexibility. Applications of 3-Fr microcatheters could be categorized into three groups according to the characteristics of usage: (1) utilization as a cannulation catheter for peroral digital cholangioscopy (n = 15); (2) selective advancement through deep flexures or severely stenotic ducts (n = 11); or (3) two-devices-in-one-channel technique (n = 8). The microcatheter worked successfully for cannulation of cholangioscopy in all but one case (14/15, 93.3%). For selective advancement, the microcatheter worked for troubleshooting in 9 of 11 cases (81.8%). With the two-devices-in-one-channel technique, the microcatheter proved satisfactory in all cases (8/8, 100%). In total, the microcatheter was successfully maneuvered in 31 of 34 cases (91.1%), following the failure of procedures using conventional endoscopic techniques. In terms of adverse events, cystic duct injury was only observed in two cases (5.8%), who recovered under conservative observation, because its slimness could minimize the damage. We believe that 3-Fr microcatheters offer effective and safe salvage troubleshooting during various endoscopic pancreaticobiliary procedures that face troublesome situations with conventional strategies.

Digital Cholangioscopic Interpretation: When North Meets the South.

BACKGROUND: Digital single-operator cholangioscopy (DSOC) (SpyGlass DS™, Boston Scientific, MA, USA) allows for high-definition imaging of the biliary tree. The superior visualization has led to the development of two different sets of criteria to evaluate and classify indeterminate biliary strictures: the Monaco criteria and the criteria in Carlos Robles-Medranda's publication (CRM). Our objective was to assess the interrater agreement (IA) of DSOC interpretation for indeterminate biliary strictures using the two newly published criteria. METHODS: Forty de-identified DSOC video recordings were sent to 15 interventional endoscopists with experience in cholangioscopy. They were asked to score the videos based on the presence of Monaco Classification criteria: stricture, lesion, mucosal changes, papillary projections, ulceration, white linear bands or rings, and vessels. Next, they scored the videos using CRM criteria: villous pattern, polypoid pattern, inflammatory pattern, flat pattern, ulcerate pattern and honeycomb pattern. The endoscopists then diagnosed the recordings as neoplastic or non-neoplastic based on the criteria. Intraclass correlation (ICC) analysis was done to evaluate interrater agreement for both criteria set and final diagnosis. RESULTS: Recordings of 26 malignant lesions and 14 benign lesions were scored. The IA using both the Monaco criteria and CRM criteria ranged from poor to excellent (range 0.1-0.76) and (range 0.1-0.62), respectively. Within the Monaco criteria, IA was excellent for lesion (0.75) and fingerlike papillary projections (0.74); good for tortuous vessels (0.7), mucosal features (0.62), uniform papillary projections (0.53), and ulceration (0.58); and fair for white linear bands (0.4). Within the CRM criteria, the IA was good for villous pattern (0.62), flat pattern (0.62), and honeycomb pattern; fair for ulcerated pattern (0.56), polypoid pattern (0.52) and inflammatory pattern (0.54). The diagnostic IA using Monaco criteria was good (0.65), while the diagnostic IA using CRM was fair (0.58). The overall diagnostic accuracy using the Monaco classification was 61% and CRM criteria were 57%. CONCLUSION: The IOA and accuracy rate of DSOC using visual criteria from both Monaco Criteria and CRM are similar. However, some criteria from both sets suffer from poor IA, thus affecting the overall diagnostic accuracy. More formal training and refinements in visual criteria with additional validation are needed to improve diagnostic accuracy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02166099.

Endoscopic Diagnosis of Biliary Stricture Combined with Digital Cholangioscope: A Case Series.

The endoscopic diagnosis of biliary tract lesions is applied as a non-invasive method; however, its diagnostic accuracy is not yet high. Moreover, digital cholangioscopy is used for directly visualizing the inside of the bile duct, resulting in a more precise biopsy. We present the case series of the outcomes of diagnosis using digital cholangioscopy in patients who underwent cholangioscopy for the evaluation of biliary stenosis in our department between January 2014 and March 2021. The controls were those who underwent a biopsy for biliary stenosis with conventional endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Background data for each case were collected, and the clinical outcomes by biopsy were evaluated, focusing on the accuracy of the diagnosis. Cholangioscopy was performed in 15 cases, while a conventional biopsy by ERCP was performed in 172 cases. Nine of 15 cases (60.0%) were diagnosed with cholangiocarcinoma. The number of specimens obtained through conventional ERCP and cholangioscopy was 2.5 ± 1.3 and 3.3 ± 1.5, respectively (p = 0.043). The diagnostic accuracy of conventional ERCP and cholangioscopy were 65.7% (113 of 172 cases) and 100%, respectively, which was significantly higher in the group with cholangioscopy. Digital cholangioscopy is useful when the diagnosis of the biliary stricture using the conventional ERCP method is difficult.

The emerging role of non-radiation endoscopic management of biliary tract disorders.

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) has evolved from a diagnostic and therapeutic technique into a therapeutic-centered modality for managing biliary disorders. Despite its many therapeutic benefits, radiation exposure from ERCP fluoroscopy is of concern and should be minimized as much as possible. Although the use of personal equipment offers significant protection against radiation, attention has been given to the development of non-radiation-based ERCP techniques. To this end, digital cholangioscopy and endoscopic ultrasound-assisted ERCP have emerged as alternatives to standard ERCP. Both techniques have sufficient feasibility and potential diagnostic accuracy to eliminate the need for fluoroscopy. Here we discuss the advances in non-radiation ERCP techniques and their role in the management of biliary stones.

Endoscopic Management of Difficult Bile Duct Stones.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: In 10-15% of the cases, conventional methods for removing bile duct stones by ERCP/balloon-basket extraction fail. The purpose of this review is to describe endoscopic techniques in managing these "difficult bile duct stones." RECENT FINDINGS: Endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation with balloon extraction ± mechanical lithotripsy is the initial approach used to retrieve large bile duct stones. With advent of digital cholangioscopy, electrohydraulic and laser lithotripsy are gaining popularity. Enteroscopy-assisted or laparoscopic-assisted approaches can be used for those with gastric bypass anatomy. Difficulties in removing bile duct stones can be related to stone-related factors such as the size and location of the stone or to altered anatomy such as stricture in the bile duct or Roux-en-Y anatomy. Several endoscopy approaches and techniques have described in the recent past that have greatly enhanced our ability to remove these "difficult" bile duct stones.