ABSTRACT
While glucocorticoids remain the standard first-line treatment for chronic idiopathic eosinophilic pneumonia (CIEP), the long-term use is marred by significant side effects. This case study explores the effectiveness of mepolizumab, an anti-interleukin5 (IL-5) monoclonal antibody, as a novel corticosteroid-free alternative in treating CIEP. A 50-year-old woman presented with a 3-week history of progressive shortness of breath, dry cough and night sweats. The blood tests showed eosinophilia, and chest radiography identified lung consolidations. The CIEP was confirmed, ruling out other conditions through a detailed clinical and bronchoscopic work-up. The patient declined to be treated with systemic glucocorticoids. Treatment with mepolizumab was remarkable for effectively resolving symptoms and improving radiological findings without any prior or concurrent glucocorticoid therapy. Notably, the patient remained relapse-free over a 2-year follow-up, underscoring mepolizumab's efficacy as a corticosteroid-free treatment for CIEP. This case study calls for further research into anti-IL5 treatment of rare respiratory conditions.
ABSTRACT
We present a case where a patient with no significant pulmonary nor autoimmune medical history presents with acute hypoxic respiratory failure and a dry cough that's made worse when conversing. She gets diagnosed with eosinophilic pneumonia after bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) showed 70% eosinophils while also having labs highly suggestive of primary Sjogren's syndrome (pSS) with an anti-SSA titer of 111.3 U/mL and anti-SSA 52 kD Ab, immunoglobulin (Ig)G >200 U. The initial treatment plan was to start rituximab to target primary Sjogren's syndrome associated interstitial lung disease (pSS-ILD), however after close discussion with pulmonology, it was changed to mepolizumab to target eosinophilic pneumonia. From a diagnostic standpoint, it may be tricky to determine which disease process is driving the symptoms especially when the patient has labs that are convincing for both.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Daptomycin-induced eosinophilic pneumonia (DIEP) is a rare yet severe adverse event that requires rapid recognition and management. Diagnosing a definite case is challenging and involves meeting the American Thoracic Society (ATS) criteria, although alternative criteria have been suggested. This study aims to conduct a systematic review of literature and includes a case series. METHODS: Six cases of DIEP identified at Perugia Hospital, Perugia, Italy have been described. A systematic review was carried out adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement guidelines. RESULTS: a total of 74 cases of DIEP were analysed. Using ATS clinical criteria, 15 were classified as definite (20.3%), 54 as probable (73.0%), and 5 as possible (6.8%). Phillips criteria and the Lyon Algorithm identified 43/74 (58.2%) and 64/67 (95.5%) cases as definite, respectively. Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) was performed in 43 cases, revealing an average eosinophil count of 28.6% (SD 24.4). Radiological findings highlighted recurring features like bilateral opacities (68.1%), ground-glass opacities (41.7%), patchy infiltrates (30.6%), and peripheral predominance (19.4%). Upon suspicion, daptomycin was discontinued; 20 cases required no additional treatment, 38 received corticosteroids, and 12 received both corticosteroids and antibiotics. Recovery rates were high across all treatment types (≥ 73.7%). Most reports described rapid improvement post-withdrawal (within 96 h). CONCLUSIONS: DIEP is a rare, fast-progressing condition where early diagnosis and prompt treatment are vital. Diagnosis relies on clinical, laboratory, and radiological evaluations. Stopping daptomycin is essential, with corticosteroids often necessary. Further research is needed to enhance diagnostic accuracy for this disease.
ABSTRACT
We present a case of a 73-year-old male with a five-month history of progressive dyspnea on exertion, cough, and worsening hypoxemia. Initial lab work did not identify peripheral eosinophilia. Chest computed tomography identified extensive ground-glass opacities in the mid-basilar. Diagnostic bronchoscopy showed an eosinophilic-rich bronchoalveolar lavage representing 63% of the total white blood cell count, confirming the diagnosis of chronic eosinophilic pneumonia. No etiology was identified despite extensive diagnostic workup. Our patient had a prolonged course of prednisone taper treatment complicated by frequent hospitalizations, osteopenia, and insomnia. Additionally, his chronic eosinophilic pneumonia relapsed shortly after stopping steroids. In our patient, off-label treatment with mepolizumab, an interleukin-5-inhibiting monoclonal antibody, was associated with symptomatic relief, imaging findings resolution, and remission maintenance without systemic steroids.
ABSTRACT
Systemic administration of corticosteroids is used in the treatment of chronic eosinophilic pneumonia (CEP). However, in patients with CEP as well as other comorbidities, the adverse effects of corticosteroids should be minimized as much as possible. A 71-year-old woman was presented with aggravating asthma with CEP and sinusitis, and she had uncompensated liver cirrhosis (LC) with a Child-Pugh score of 7. Initial treatment with a low dose of oral corticosteroids (OCSs) in combination with tezepelumab, an anti-thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP) antibody, resulted in rapid improvement of asthma and CEP without deteriorating LC. Sinusitis also improved after ceasing OCS. This case suggested that tezepelumab may be useful as a treatment option for patients with CEP, especially those with liver dysfunction.
ABSTRACT
Several reports have described dupilumab-induced eosinophilic pneumonia (EP) after treatment with dupilumab in patients with type 2 inflammatory disease. Other reports have suggested the efficacy of dupilumab for chronic EP (CEP). Whether dupilumab can be continued in patients with type 2 inflammatory disease who develop EP during dupilumab treatment remains unclear. We present herein three cases with different clinical presentations involving dupilumab and EP. In Case 1, dupilumab was discontinued because of dupilumab-induced EP during the treatment of asthma. In Case 2, although pre-existing idiopathic EP worsened during the treatment of eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis (ECRS), dupilumab was continued. In Case 3, CEP and ECRS were successfully treated with dupilumab and corticosteroids were discontinued. In conclusion, treatment with dupilumab in patients with type 2 inflammatory disease and idiopathic EP is worth considering if the benefits are deemed to outweigh the risks and careful attention is given to the clinical course.
ABSTRACT
Acute and chronic eosinophilic pneumonia (AEP and CEP) include a group of rare interstitial lung diseases characterized by peripheral blood eosinophilia, increased eosinophils in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, or eosinophilic infiltration of lung parenchyma. AEP is characterized by rapid onset, fast response to steroid treatment, and no relapse. CEP is characterized by marked tissue and peripheral blood eosinophilia, rapid response to steroid therapy, and tendency to disease recurrence. In addition, we briefly describe other eosinophilic lung diseases that must be considered in differential diagnosis of AEP and CEP. Eosinophilic pneumonias may be idiopathic or due to known causes such as medications or environmental exposure. At variance with previous reviews on this topic, a particular look in this overview was directed at pathological findings and radiological patterns.
ABSTRACT
E-cigarette-/vape-associated lung injury (EVALI) refers to damage to lung tissue occurring as a result of e-cigarette utilization or via vaping of inhaled nicotine products. Vaping refers to the practice of inhaling an aerosol derived from heating a liquid or gas containing substances such as nicotine, cannabinoids, flavoring, or additives. Battery-operated e-cigarettes or vape pens are the vessels commonly used in this practice. EVALI, first described in the literature in 2019, has a non-specific course, presenting initially with cough and dyspnea. It can progress, however, to interstitial lung disease or result in damage to the lung parenchyma with concomitant inflammation and fibrosis. Imaging findings reflect the development of this inflammation and fibrosis, often visualized as ground-glass opacities on computed tomography (CT) scans. Formal biopsies are not required to make the diagnosis of EVALI, and thus, a gap exists in the scientific literature with regard to the pathology of lungs exposed to non-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) e-cigarettes. The following case details the clinical course of a 62-year-old male who presented to the outpatient pulmonology office with symptomology and exposure history consistent with EVALI, unique in presentation due to the timeline of his disease development. The patient initially presented to the clinic for the evaluation of a non-productive cough and exertional dyspnea beginning one year ago, with an associated new home oxygen requirement of 2 liters via nasal cannula. The patient's past medical history was relevant for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated with the chemotherapeutic regimen that consists of etoposide phosphate, prednisone, vincristine sulfate (Oncovin), cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin hydrochloride (hydroxydaunorubicin), and rituximab, commonly known as EPOCH-R, as well as a social history relevant for a 35-pack-year smoking history. On further questioning, the patient revealed that following cessation of cigarette smoking, he began using non-THC e-cigarettes daily and had been doing so for 10 years prior to symptom onset. Imaging and biopsy findings consisted of a CT of the chest demonstrating concern for interstitial lung disease and an open lung biopsy demonstrating diffuse alveolar damage with eosinophilia. Given the patient's history, clinical symptoms, and imaging findings, a diagnosis of EVALI was established. This case was documented not only to increase awareness of the rising incidence of EVALI as the use of e-cigarettes and vapes becomes increasingly popular but also to further understand the inhalational injury sustained from non-THC e-cigarettes and other inhalational practices.
ABSTRACT
Daptomycin is an antibiotic used for resistant Gram-positive organisms and has the rare side effect of inducing acute eosinophilic pneumonia (AEP). This condition can be fatal due to respiratory failure if not treated, as eosinophils migrate to the lungs and inflammatory cascades cause epithelial injury. Daptomycin-induced AEP can be misdiagnosed as bacterial pneumonia or malignancy, which may lead to unnecessary testing or treatments. Diagnostic criteria include dyspnea, fever, recent daptomycin exposure, infiltrates on imaging, eosinophils on bronchoalveolar lavage or peripheral eosinophilia, and clinical improvement with medication discontinuation. We present a unique case of daptomycin-induced eosinophilic pneumonia in a 72-year-old male with the chief complaint of dyspnea and initial concerns for lung cancer after a spiculated nodule was seen on imaging. Prior to undergoing a lung biopsy, repeat imaging showed a decrease in the suspicious nodule, reducing the likelihood of malignancy and prompting a re-evaluation of the history of the present illness and medication list. Daptomycin was stopped, and the patient's symptoms and imaging improved. This case illustrates the importance of early recognition and appropriate treatment of AEP, which allows for complete clinical recovery.
ABSTRACT
We present an interesting case of a patient who was discharged from the hospital on daptomycin and ertapenem in the setting of osteomyelitis. The patient did not have any respiratory symptoms during that hospital stay. A few weeks after discharge, the patient came back to the hospital with complaints of fever and shortness of breath. Chest X-ray showed pulmonary infiltrates. Initially, the patient was treated for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) vs pneumonia, but she did not improve. When labs showed significant eosinophilia, daptomycin-induced eosinophilic pneumonia became the working diagnosis, and the patient improved significantly when daptomycin was discontinued and steroids were started.
ABSTRACT
This report presents the case of a 42-year-old Japanese woman with recurrent hormone receptor-positive breast cancer who developed eosinophilic pneumonia (EP) during treatment with abemaciclib combined with endocrine therapy. Seven years after a radical surgery and definite diagnosis of Stage I breast cancer, her cancer recurred with metastases to multiple organs. Initially treated with abemaciclib plus letrozole and goserelin for 3 months, she developed EP, which improved after the discontinuation of anti-cancer treatment and the administration of prednisolone. However, EP occurred again upon the reintroduction of endocrine therapy (i.e., letrozole and goserelin). It improved gradually with the suspension of endocrine therapy and the re-administration of prednisolone. This case underscores the need for further research into the prevention and management of EP in patients receiving abemaciclib with endocrine therapy for advanced breast cancer.
ABSTRACT
A man who is 38 years old and diagnosed with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder was prescribed methylphenidate. Three weeks later, he began experiencing progressive shortness of breath and coughing. Imaging of his chest showed patchy bilateral ground-glass opacities, and bronchoscopy revealed a 15% eosinophil count in his bronchoalveolar lavage. A transbronchial biopsy confirmed a diagnosis of eosinophilic pneumonia. The patient's condition improved when he was given steroids and stopped taking methylphenidate. However, he developed the same symptoms again a few days after restarting the medication, along with a skin rash. This strongly suggests that methylphenidate was the cause of his eosinophilic pneumonia.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Idiopathic chronic eosinophilic pneumonia (ICEP) is a rare disease characterized by pulmonary radiological alterations, peripheral eosinophilia, and demonstrated pulmonary eosinophilia. Oral steroids (OSs) are the standard management, but relapses occur in up to 50% of patients during the decrease or suspension of steroids, usually requiring reinitiation of treatment, exposing patients to secondary events derived from the management. Management with monoclonal antibodies has been proposed in these cases to control the disease and limit the secondary effects. The objective is to describe the extent and type of evidence regarding the use of monoclonal antibodies for ICEP. METHODS: A panoramic review of the literature was performed. Observational and experimental studies of pediatric and adult populations that managed recurrent ICEP with monoclonal antibodies were included. Data search, selection, and extraction were performed by two independent reviewers. RESULTS: 937 studies were found. After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 37 titles remained for the final analysis: a retrospective, observational, real-life study, two case series publications, and 34 case reports published in academic poster sessions and letters to the editor. In general, the use of monoclonal antibodies approved for severe asthma could be useful for the control of ICEP, since most of the results show a good response for clinical and radiological outcomes. Biological drugs seem to be a safer option for controlling relapses in ICEP, allowing lowering/suspension of OSs, and sometimes replacing them in patients intolerant to them, patients with significant comorbidities, and patients who have already developed adverse events. CONCLUSION: The extent of the evidence supporting management of ICEP with monoclonal antibodies against IL-5 and IgE (omalizumab) is limited, but it could be promising in patients who present frequent relapses, in cortico-dependent individuals, or in patients in whom the use of steroids is contraindicated. The extent of the evidence for management with dupilumab is more limited. Studies with better design and structure are needed to evaluate quality of life and outcomes during a clear follow-up period. To our knowledge, this is the first scoping review of the literature showing the extent of the evidence for the management of ICEP with monoclonal antibodies.
Subject(s)
Asthma , Pulmonary Eosinophilia , Adult , Humans , Child , Pulmonary Eosinophilia/drug therapy , Pulmonary Eosinophilia/complications , Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use , Quality of Life , Retrospective Studies , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Asthma/complications , Steroids/therapeutic use , RecurrenceABSTRACT
A 60-year-old man who had been keeping seven budgerigars and four cockatiels in his house for 2 years developed dyspnea and was admitted to our hospital the day after receiving the second dose of the messenger RNA coronavirus disease 2019 vaccination. Chest high resolution computed tomography (HRCT) showed bilateral ground glass opacities without nodules or mosaic attenuation. IgG specific for budgerigars was positive. Although his respiratory symptoms were resolved without corticosteroid therapy, he developed severe dyspnea soon after the discharge to his home. The results of bronchial alveolar lavage fluid obtained at the initial admission and after the provocation challenge showed elevation of lymphocytes (34%) and eosinophils (37%). We finally diagnosed him with non-fibrotic bird-related hypersensitivity pneumonitis. His condition and HRCT findings were improved by corticosteroid treatment. All his birds were given away. He has not experienced any recurrence or deterioration of respiratory function even after withdrawal of corticosteroid.
ABSTRACT
Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are widely used and their gastric, cardiovascular, and renal adverse effects have been well documented. Although rare, NSAID-induced acute eosinophilic pneumonia (AEP) may occur. We report a case of AEP related to naproxen and celecoxib. The patient presented with dry cough and breathlessness two weeks after she started taking these drugs. The chest radiograph displayed bilateral opacities and she had peripheral eosinophilia. Bronchoalveolar lavage was performed at a time when blood eosinophilia was already decreasing and cell analysis revealed 63700 cells/mL with 9% eosinophil. After ruling out other possible etiologies, drug-induced AEP was diagnosed. The patient improved after drug discontinuation. When it comes to drug-induced AEP identifying a causative agent is essential as cessation of the drug is the mainstay of the treatment.
ABSTRACT
A 79-year-old woman with severe asthma developed chronic eosinophilic pneumonia (CEP). After CEP resolved with oral prednisolone at 30 mg/day, prednisolone was tapered and discontinued under introduction of benralizumab for her severe asthma. However, 8 weeks later, symptoms and bilateral patchy infiltrates on chest radiography appeared. Lymphocytosis without eosinophilia was seen in bronchoalveolar lavage fluids, and transbronchial biopsy indicated organizing pneumonia. Cryptogenic organizing pneumonia (COP) was diagnosed and resolved with prednisolone at 30 mg/day. Prednisolone was tapered to 3 mg/day without relapse of CEP or COP. This case suggests the overlap and similar pathogenesis of CEP and COP.
Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Asthma , Cryptogenic Organizing Pneumonia , Pulmonary Eosinophilia , Female , Humans , Aged , Pulmonary Eosinophilia/chemically induced , Pulmonary Eosinophilia/drug therapy , Cryptogenic Organizing Pneumonia/chemically induced , Cryptogenic Organizing Pneumonia/drug therapy , Cryptogenic Organizing Pneumonia/pathology , Asthma/drug therapy , Adrenal Cortex Hormones , Prednisolone/adverse effectsABSTRACT
Chronic eosinophilic pneumonia (CEP) is an eosinophilic lung disease. Treatment for CEP includes corticosteroids; however, CEP often recurs. A 53-year-old woman was referred to our hospital because of poorly controlled asthma. She was treated with combination of moderate-dose inhaled corticosteroid (ICS), a long-acting ß2-agonist (LABA), and betamethasone/dexchlorpheniramine. She was switched to single-inhaler triple therapy, after which her asthma control improved; thus, betamethasone/dexchlorpheniramine was discontinued. Ten weeks later, she was diagnosed with CEP due to marked eosinophilia and pulmonary eosinophilic infiltrates. Oral corticosteroid treatment was initiated, symptoms improved, and peripheral blood eosinophilia decreased with improved infiltrative shadows. Remission induction therapy was initiated with benralizumab combined with corticosteroid therapy. Eosinophilia and inflammatory responses decreased. After 7 months, corticosteroid was discontinued, and she was treated with benralizumab alone. She remained in remission for 4 months. This case suggests that benralizumab may be useful as a remission induction therapy in patients with CEP.
ABSTRACT
Dupilumab inhibits interleukin-4Rα and suppresses type 2 inflammation. Careful administration of dupilumab is required because it increases the blood eosinophil count secondary to a decrease in local eosinophil counts, sometimes resulting in eosinophilic complications. We herein report a case of recurrent chronic eosinophilic pneumonia after switching from benralizumab to dupilumab. A 54-year-old man with a history of eosinophilic pneumonia presented to our hospital with symptoms of cough, fever, and phlegm production six months after beginning dupilumab administration for recurrent chronic rhinosinusitis. When using dupilumab, it is essential to carefully monitor patients' eosinophil trends and pulmonary symptoms.