ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: No study has ever compared the efficacy of various types of supraglottic devices (SGDs) for securing the airway under cricoid pressure. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of six SGDs, LMA-ProSeal (ProSeal), LMA-Classic (Classic), Laryngeal Tube (LT), LMA-Supreme (Supreme), air-Q (air-Q), and i-gel (i-gel), in airway management under cricoid pressure using a manikin. METHODS: Fifteen novice doctors and 16 experienced doctors used the six SGDs under cricoid or sham pressure on an adult manikin. Insertion time, successful ventilation rate, and subjective insertion difficulty on a visual analogue scale (VAS) were measured. RESULTS: Both novice and experienced doctors had a significantly lower ventilation success rate under cricoid pressure than under sham pressure when using the ProSeal, Classic, and LT, but not when using the other three SGDs. Novice doctors required a significantly longer insertion time under cricoid pressure than under sham pressure with all SGDs. Experienced doctors required a significantly longer insertion time under cricoid pressure than with sham pressure when using the ProSeal, Classic, and LT, but not when using the other three SGDs. Subjective insertion difficulty on VAS was significantly higher under cricoid pressure than under sham pressure with all six SGDs. CONCLUSION: Ventilation success rate under cricoid pressure was significantly lower than under sham pressure when using the ProSeal, Classic, and LT, but not when using the other three SGDs in both novice and experienced doctors.
Subject(s)
Clinical Competence/standards , Cricoid Cartilage/pathology , Equipment Design/standards , Intubation, Intratracheal/standards , Pressure , Adult , Airway Management/instrumentation , Airway Management/methods , Airway Management/standards , Cross-Over Studies , Female , Humans , Intubation, Intratracheal/instrumentation , Intubation, Intratracheal/methods , Male , Manikins , Middle Aged , Physicians/standards , Resuscitation/instrumentation , Resuscitation/methods , Resuscitation/standardsABSTRACT
PURPOSE: During out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation, several factors can render tracheal intubation more difficult, such as when rescuers must secure the airway in complete darkness or with limited illumination. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of six supraglottic devices (SGDs), ProSeal(®) (ProSeal), Classic(®) (Classic), Supreme(®) (Supreme), Laryngeal Tube(®) (LT), air-Q(®) (air-Q), and i-gel(®) (i-gel), for airway management under light and dark conditions using a manikin. METHODS: Seventeen novice doctors and 15 experienced doctors performed insertion of six SGDs under light and dark conditions using an adult manikin. Insertion time, successful ventilation rate, and subjective insertion difficulty on a visual analogue scale (VAS) were measured. RESULTS: Both novice and experienced doctors had a significantly lower ventilation success rate in the dark than in the light when ProSeal and Classic were used, but not with the other four SGDs. Novice doctors required a significantly longer insertion time in the dark than in the light with all SGDs. Experienced doctors required a significantly longer insertion time in the dark than in the light with ProSeal or Classic, but not with the other four SGDs. VAS was significantly higher for both novice and experienced doctors when ProSeal and Classic were used, as compared with the other four SGDs in the dark. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to ProSeal and Classic, Supreme, i-gel, LT, and air-Q are more effective for airway management in the dark. Our findings suggest that anatomically shaped SGDs may help novice doctors secure the airway under dark conditions.