Case report: Treatment of anterior cerebral artery aneurysms with combined remodeling technique and flow diverter deployment through a dual lumen balloon catheter.

We present the technical aspects of embolization for two unruptured medium-sized aneurysms of the anterior cerebral artery treated with balloon-remodeling technique and loose coiling of the sac with the final deployment of a 0. 017-compatible flow diverter. Both procedures were performed with dual antiplatelet therapy premedication and under general anesthesia. The anatomy of the two aneurysms was similar with a wide neck and the presence of a collateral artery branching off it, which required the additional use of a compliant balloon in order to retain patency and avoid coil protrusion. After initial coiling, a nitinol flow-diverter was deployed through a coaxial dual lumen balloon microcatheter. Both these interventions encountered no complications, and the patient was discharged on day 2. At 6-month clinical and radiological follow-up, neither patient had neurological deficits, the aneurysms were both completely occluded, nor the stented arteries were patent along with their collateral branches.

Safety and Efficacy of Coils in Conjunction With the Pipeline Flex Embolization Device for the Treatment of Cerebral Aneurysms.

Background: Flow diverters (FD) have shown promising results in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms (IAs). However, there is still controversy whether pipeline flex embolization device (PED flex)-assisted coils can facilitate the curing of aneurysms. Our aim was to assess the safety and effectiveness of PED flex adjunctive with coils (PED flex + coil) in the treatment of IAs. Method: Patients who underwent PED flex treatment in combination with coiling between January 2018 and June 2020 were included in this study. The clinical and radiographic characteristics before and after treatments were retrospectively evaluated. The study cohort comprised of 125 patients with 140 IAs, which was subdivided into two subgroups: one group included patients treated only through PED alone, and the other group included patients treated through PED flex adjunctive with coil. Patient baseline characteristics, aneurysm characteristics, treatment-related factors, and outcomes were analyzed to determine the effectiveness of both techniques. Results: Aneurysms in the PED flex + coil group were larger (10.0 ± 5.8 mm, P < 0.001) and wider (7.2 ± 4.6 mm, P = 0.002) compared with those in the PED flex group. There was no statistical difference in the perioperative complication rate between the two groups. The overall complete occlusion rate was 75.7% at 6.2 months, with 71.7% at 6.2 ± 1.7 months in the PED flex group and 85.4% at 6.2 ± 1.8 months in the PED flex + coil group, respectively. A higher percentage of satisfactory angiography results was found in the PED flex + coil group during follow-up (92.7 vs. 78.8%, P = 0.047). Conclusion: PED flex placement with adjunctive coil embolization represents a safe alternative option for the treatment of IAs. In these cases, coil embolization increases the occlusion rate in PED flex-treated patients without increasing the periprocedural complications.

Pediatric Patient With a Giant Vertebrobasilar Dissecting Aneurysm Successfully Treated With Three Pipeline Embolization Devices.

Pediatric intracranial dissecting aneurysms are rare (1), and treating this type of aneurysm in the vertebrobasilar circulation is more difficult. As an off-label application, pipeline embolization devices (PEDs) for posterior circulation dissecting aneurysms are reported to have good therapeutic effect (2). However, studies have found that PEDs for large or giant vertebrobasilar dissecting aneurysms have a poor effect and are associated with disastrous consequences for patients (3). PEDs are feasible for vertebrobasilar dissecting aneurysms (4); however, few reports discuss using PEDs to span the entire segment of the basilar artery. Because there are more perforating arteries in the basilar artery, it is more prudent to use PEDs in this artery. We report a case of a pediatric patient with a giant vertebrobasilar dissecting aneurysm successfully treated with three PEDs combined with right vertebral artery occlusion, without complications. The patient's headache symptoms resolved fully 3 months after the procedure, and the aneurysm was completely healed and excellent reconstruction of the left vertebral artery was seen 4 months post-procedure, using digital subtraction angiography.

Effects from Side Branch Diameter of Intracranial Aneurysm on Hemodynamic Parameters after Flow Diverter Implantation / 医用生物力学

Objective To comprehensively consider the effect of low diverter (FD) implantation on aneurysmal sac and its branches, so as to provide references for making a more reasonable surgical strategy for intracranial aneurysm embolization in clinical practice. Methods Based on computational fluid dynamics (CFD) method, the FD implantation procedure was simulated by using porous media model innovatively. Changes in hemodynamic parameters of aneurysmal sac and side branch with different diameters before and after FD implantation were compared and analyzed, such as blood flow field, velocity, wall pressure and wall shear stress (WSS). Results FD changed the hemodynamic characteristics of aneurysms. The blood flow velocity decreased significantly. The WSS on aneurysmal neck increased, while the difference of WSS between proximal and distal cervical area reduced conversely. Different side branch diameters of vessels had different effects on hemodynamic characteristic changes. The larger diameter would cause the greater blood flow reduction in side branch after FD implantation, but the decrease in velocity of aneurysmal sac and pressure on aneurysmal roof became smaller simultaneously. Meanwhile, the increase of WSS on aneurysmal neck was inversely proportional to the diameter of side branch. Conclusions The larger branch diameter of vessels would cause the worse effect of FD embolization therapy for intracranial aneurysm, worse atherosclerosis improvements and greater possibilities of branch occlusion or other ischemic complications. Doctors should pay more attention to such cases in FD interventional intravascular embolization in clinic.

Variation of Mass Effect After Using a Flow Diverter With Adjunctive Coil Embolization for Symptomatic Unruptured Large and Giant Intracranial Aneurysms.

Background: Mass effect associated with large or giant aneurysms is an intractable problem for traditional endovascular treatments. Preventing recurrence of aneurysms requires dense coiling, which may aggravate the mass effect. However, the flow diverter (FD) is a new device that avoids the need for dense coiling. This study was performed to investigate whether use of FDs with adjunctive coil embolization can relieve the aneurysmal mass effect and to explore the factors that affect the variation of compressional symptoms. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated patients with compressional symptoms caused by unruptured aneurysms who underwent endovascular treatment with an FD with adjunctive coil embolization at our center from January 2015 to December 2017. Imaging follow-up included digital subtraction angiography (DSA) ranging from 11 to 14 months and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) ranging from 24 to 30 months; the former was used to evaluate the intracavitary volume, and the latter was used to measure the variation of the mass effect. Follow-up physical examinations were performed to observe variations of symptoms. Results: In total, 22 patients with 22 aneurysms were treated by an FD combined with coil embolization. All 22 patients underwent the last clinical follow-up. Regarding compressional symptoms, 12 (54.54%) patients showed improvement, 6 (27.27%) were fully recovered, and 6 (27.27%) showed improvement but with incomplete cranial palsy. However, five (22.72%) patients showed no change, four (18.18%) showed worsening symptoms compared with their preoperative state, and one (4.55%) died of delayed rupture. Seventeen of the 22 patients underwent MRI. Of these 17 patients, the aneurysm shrank in 13 (76.47%) and no significant change occurred in 4 (23.53%). In the multivariate analysis, a short duration from symptom occurrence to treatment (p = 0.03) and younger patient age (p = 0.038) were statistically significant factors benefiting symptom improvement, and shrinkage of the aneurysm was associated with favorable clinical outcomes (p = 0.006). Conclusions: Use of the FD with adjunctive loose coil embolization might help to alleviate the compressional symptoms caused by intracranial aneurysms. Shrinkage of the aneurysm, a short duration of symptoms, and younger patient age might contribute to favorable outcomes of mass effect-related symptoms.

Angiographic analysis for phantom simulations of endovascular aneurysm treatments with a new fully retrievable asymmetric flow diverter.

Digital Subtraction Angiography (DSA) is the main diagnostic tool for intracranial aneurysms (IA) flow-diverter (FD) assisted treatment. Based on qualitative contrast flow evaluation, interventionists decide on subsequent steps. We developed a novel fully Retrievable Asymmetric Flow-Diverter (RAFD) which allows controlled deployment, repositioning and detachment achieve optimal flow diversion. The device has a small low porosity or solid region which is placed such that it would achieve maximum aneurysmal in-jet flow deflection with minimum impairment to adjacent vessels. We tested the new RAFD using a flow-loop with an idealized and a patient specific IA phantom in carotid-relevant physiological conditions. We positioned the deflection region at three locations: distally, center and proximally to the aneurysm orifice and analyzed aneurysm dome flow using DSA derived maps for mean transit time (MTT) and bolus arrival times (BAT). Comparison between treated and untreated (control) maps quantified the RAFD positioning effect. Average MTT, related to contrast presence in the aneurysm dome increased, indicating flow decoupling between the aneurysm and parent artery. Maximum effect was observed in the center and proximal position (~75%) of aneurysm models depending on their geometry. BAT maps, correlated well with inflow jet direction and magnitude. Reduction and jet dispersion as high as about 50% was observed for various treatments. We demonstrated the use of DSA data to guide the placement of the RAFD and showed that optimum flow diversion within the aneurysm dome is feasible. This could lead to more effective and a safer IA treatment using FDs.