Fluid Restriction for Patients with Heart Failure: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives.

Fluid restriction has long been believed to benefit patients with heart failure by counteracting the activated renin-angiotensin aldosterone system and sympathetic nervous activity. However, its effectiveness remains controversial. In this paper, we summarized the current recommendations and reviewed the scientific evidence on fluid restriction in the setting of both acute decompensated heart failure and compensated heart failure. While a recent meta-analysis demonstrated the beneficial effects of fluid restriction on both all-cause mortality and hospitalization compared to usual care, several weaknesses were identified in the assessment of the methodological quality of the meta-analysis using AMSTAR 2. Further randomized controlled trials with larger sample sizes are needed to elucidate the benefits of fluid restriction for both clinical outcomes and patient-reported outcomes in patients with heart failure.

Hyponatremia - Treatment standard 2024.

Hyponatremia is the most common electrolyte disorder in hospital patients associated with increased morbidity, mortality, hospital stay and financial burden. The speed of a correction with 3% sodium chloride as 100 mL IV bolus or continuous infusion depends on the severity and persistence of the symptoms, and needs frequent biochemical monitoring. The rapid intermittent administration of hypertonic saline is preferred for treatment of symptomatic hyponatremia. In asymptomatic mild hyponatremia, an adequate solute intake with an initial fluid restriction (FR) of 500 mL/d adjusted according to the serum sodium levels is preferred. Almost half of the syndrome of inappropriate diuresis hormone (SIADH) patients do not respond to FR as first-line therapy. At present, urea and tolvaptan are considered as most effective second-line therapies in SIADH. However, the evidence for guidance on the choice of second-line therapy of hypotonic hyponatremia is lacking. Oral urea is considered as very effective and safe treatment. Mild and asymptomatic hyponatremia is treated with adequate solute intake (salt and protein) and an initial FR with adjustments based on serum sodium levels. Specific treatment with vaptans may be considered in either euvolemic or hypervolemic patients with high ADH activity. In order to ensure optimal patient outcome, a close monitoring and readiness for administration of either hypotonic fluids or desmopressin may be crucial in decision making process for specific treatment and eventual overcorrection consequences. According to the guidelines, a gradual correction and clinical evaluation is preferable over the rapid normalization of serum sodium towards the laboratory reference ranges.

The current state of evidence for sodium and fluid restriction in heart failure.

The field of heart failure has evolved in terms of the therapies that are available including pharmaceutical and device therapies. There is now substantial randomized trial data to indicate that dietary sodium restriction does not provide the reduction in clinical events with accepted heterogeneity in the clinical trial results. Dietary sodium restriction should be considered for some but not all patients and with different objectives than clinical outcomes but instead for potential quality of life benefit. In addition, fluid restriction, once the mainstay of clinical practice, has not shown to be of any additional benefit for patients in hospital or in the ambulatory care setting and therefore should be considered to be used cautiously (if at all) in clinical practice. Further developments and clinical trials are needed in this area to better identify patients who may benefit or have harm from these lower cost interventions and future research should focus on large scale, high quality, clinical trials rather than observational data to drive clinical practice.

Pilot Intervention for Mindful Drinking and Eating for Patients on Hemodialysis with Fluid Restrictions: Lessons Learned.

Patients requiring hemodialysis would benefit from evidence-based strategies that improve adherence to fluid restrictions while concurrently improving quality of life (QOL). This pilot study examined the effect of a four-week mindful drinking and eating intervention on interdialytic weight gain and QOL in patients on hemodialysis. Using paired t tests, no significant differences from pre- to post-test were found in interdialytic weight gain, a measure of fluid restriction adherence, or QOL in either the intervention (n = 18) or wait list control (n = 19) group. However, there was positive qualitative feedback from participants in exit interviews, and there were other indications of feasibility (low drop out, engagement in at-home practice according to weekly checklists). Lessons learned from this pilot study about conducting research regarding fluid restrictions for patients on hemodialysis are presented.

The Effects of Restrictive Fluid Resuscitation on the Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Sepsis or Septic Shock: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized-Controlled Trials.

This study aims to assess the impact of a restrictive resuscitation strategy on the outcomes of patients with sepsis and septic shock. This meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with the recommendations from the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) guidelines. A systematic search was performed in databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library, covering the period from the inception of the database to August 2023, with no limitations on the language of publication. Outcomes assessed in the meta-analysis included mortality, duration of intensive care unit (ICU) stay in days, duration of mechanical ventilation in days, acute kidney injury (AKI) or the need for renal replacement therapy (RRT), and length of hospital stay in days. Overall, 12 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the present meta-analysis. The findings of this study indicate that although the risk of mortality was lower in fluid restriction compared to the control group, the difference was statistically insignificant (risk ratio (RR): 0.98; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.9-1.05; P value: 0.61). Additionally, the duration of mechanical ventilation was significantly shorter in the restrictive fluid group compared to its counterparts (mean difference (MD): -1.02; 95% CI: -1.65 to -0.38; P value: 0.003). There were no significant differences found in relation to the duration of ICU stays, the incidence of AKI, the requirement for RRT, or the length of hospital stays measured in days.

Thirst in heart failure: A scoping review.

AIM: The aim of this study was to summarise the overall picture of thirst-related research in patients with heart failure. DESIGN: We conducted a scoping review following the Arskey and O'Malley methodological framework along with the PAGER framework. METHODS: PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, Embase, The Cochrane Library, Jonna Briggs Institute, ProQuest Database, Google Scholar, PsycINFO, PQDT, CNKI, Wan Fang, VIP and CBM. Additionally, grey literature including grey databases (Opengrey, OpenDoar, Openaire and BASEL Bielefeld Academic Search Engine), conferences or articles (Scopus and Microsoft Academic), graduate theses databases (eTHOS, DART Europe, Worldcat and EBSCO Open Dissertations) and government information media (UK guidance and regulations, USA government websites, EU Bookshop and UN official publications) were searched. The databases were searched from inception to 18 August 2022 for Articles written in English and Chinese. Two researchers independently screened articles based on inclusion and exclusion criteria, and a third researcher adjudicated disagreements. RESULTS: We retrieved 825 articles, of which 26 were included. Three themes were summarised from these articles: (a) the incidence of thirst in patients with heart failure; (b) the thirst-related factors in patients with heart failure; and (c) the intervention measures of thirst in patients with heart failure.

Impact of intraoperative fluid restriction on renal outcomes in patients undergoing robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy.

Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) requires intraoperative fluid restriction to maintain the optimal view of the operative field during vesicourethral anastomosis and to prevent upper airway edema that may occur due to the steep Trendelenburg position. The aim of this study was to demonstrate that our fluid restriction regimen would not increase postoperative serum creatinine (sCr) levels in patients undergoing RALP. The fluid regimen involved maintaining a crystalloid infusion at 1 ml/kg/h until completion of vesicourethral anastomosis, then rapid infusion of 15 ml/kg within 30 min, followed by maintenance at 1.5 ml/kg/h until post-operative day (POD) 1. The primary outcome of this study was the change in the sCr level from baseline to POD7. Secondary outcomes were the sCr levels on PODs 1 and 2, the surgical view during vesicourethral anastomosis, and the incidences of re-intubation and acute kidney injury (AKI). Sixty-six patients were eligible for the analysis. The paired t test for non-inferiority showed no significant difference in sCr levels between baseline and POD7 (mean ± standard deviation, 0.79 ± 0.14 vs. 0.80 ± 0.18 mg/dl, p < 0.001). Seven patients developed AKI on POD1, but all but one recovered on POD2. Ninety-seven percent of operations were rated as having a good view of the operative field. There were no cases of re-intubation. This study demonstrated that the fluid restriction regimen of 1 ml/kg/h until completion of vesicourethral anastomosis created a good view of the operative field during vesicourethral anastomosis without increasing postoperative sCr levels in patients undergoing RALP. Trial registration: This trial was registered in the University Hospital Medical Information Network under registration number UMIN000018088 (registration date; July 1, 2015).

Syndrome of Inappropriate Antidiuresis: From Pathophysiology to Management.

Hyponatremia is the most common electrolyte disorder, affecting more than 15% of patients in the hospital. Syndrome of inappropriate antidiuresis (SIAD) is the most frequent cause of hypotonic hyponatremia, mediated by nonosmotic release of arginine vasopressin (AVP, previously known as antidiuretic hormone), which acts on the renal V2 receptors to promote water retention. There are a variety of underlying causes of SIAD, including malignancy, pulmonary pathology, and central nervous system pathology. In clinical practice, the etiology of hyponatremia is frequently multifactorial and the management approach may need to evolve during treatment of a single episode. It is therefore important to regularly reassess clinical status and biochemistry, while remaining alert to potential underlying etiological factors that may become more apparent during the course of treatment. In the absence of severe symptoms requiring urgent intervention, fluid restriction (FR) is widely endorsed as the first-line treatment for SIAD in current guidelines, but there is considerable controversy regarding second-line therapy in instances where FR is unsuccessful, which occurs in around half of cases. We review the epidemiology, pathophysiology, and differential diagnosis of SIAD, and summarize recent evidence for therapeutic options beyond FR, with a focus on tolvaptan, urea, and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors.

Fluid Restriction Reduces Delayed Hyponatremia and Hospital Readmissions After Transsphenoidal Surgery.

CONTEXT: Postoperative hyponatremia leads to prolonged hospital length of stay and readmission within 30 days. OBJECTIVE: To assess 3 strategies for reducing rates of postoperative hyponatremia and analyze risk factors for hyponatremia. DESIGN: Two retrospective analyses and 1 prospective study. SETTING: Tertiary referral hospital. PATIENTS: Patients undergoing transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary adenomas and other sellar and parasellar pathologies. INTERVENTION(S): Phase 1: no intervention. Phase 2: postoperative day (POD) 7 sodium testing and patient education. Phase 3: fluid restriction to 1 L/day on discharge in addition to phase 2 interventions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Rates of early and delayed hyponatremia and readmissions. Secondary outcomes were risk factors for hyponatremia and readmission costs. RESULTS: In phase 1, 296 patients underwent transsphenoidal surgery. Twenty percent developed early and 28% delayed hyponatremia. Thirty-eight percent underwent POD 7 sodium testing. Readmission rates were 15% overall and 4.3% for hyponatremia. In phase 2 (n = 316), 22% developed early and 25% delayed hyponatremia. Eighty-nine percent complied with POD 7 sodium testing. Readmissions were unchanged although severity of hyponatremia was reduced by 60%. In phase 3 (n = 110), delayed hyponatremia was reduced 2-fold [12.7%, relative risk (RR) = 0.52] and readmissions 3-fold [4.6%, RR = 0.30 (0.12-0.73)]; readmissions for hyponatremia were markedly reduced. Hyponatremia readmission increased costs by 30%. CONCLUSIONS: Restricting fluid to 1 L/day on discharge decreases rates of delayed hyponatremia and readmissions by 50%. Standardized patient education and POD 7 sodium testing decreases severity of hyponatremia but does not impact readmission rates. These protocols should be considered standard practice for patients undergoing transsphenoidal surgery.

Reply to the comment on "Fluid restriction in management of patent ductus arteriosus in Italy: a nationwide survey".

The Authors Chang Liu B.S and Yuan Shi commented our paper on Fluid restriction in management of patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) in Italy. With our study, we conducted a prospective cross-sectional survey among all Italian Neonatal Intensive Care Units (NICUs) to address conservative management of patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) in preterm infants below 29 weeks' gestational age (GA), with specific regard to fluid restriction (FR). The Authors wondered if the heterogeneity of use of fluid restriction both as a prophylactic tool and as a conservative tool when a hemodynamically significant PDA is diagnosed, was due to economic disparities among areas of the included centers. Conducting a secondary analysis of our data, we observed that if we separately consider the responses of two areas, northern and central-southern Italy, FR is slightly more frequently applied in Central and Southern regions (82%) as compared to Northern regions (78%), although this finding does not reach statistical significance. No correlation between the likelihood to adopt conservative measures and the amount of allowed fluid intake was found. The hypothesis that "less fluid intake resulted in milder clinical and echocardiographic presentations of PDA, and thus a lower rate of pharmacological treatment" cannot be supported by our current study design and might deserve future investigations.

Fluid restriction in management of patent ductus arteriosus in Italy: a nationwide survey.

We aimed at establishing the state of the art in fluid restriction practice in our national setting and providing a foundation for future research efforts. A prospective cross-sectional survey was conducted among all 114 Italian Neonatal Units in order to address conservative management of patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) in preterm infants below 29 weeks' gestational age (GA), with specific regard to fluid restriction. Response rate was 80%. Conservative measures for PDA management are provided in the majority of NICUs and 80% of centers reduce fluid intake in neonates with PDA. No relationship can be found among pharmacologically or surgically treated patients per year and the approach to fluid restriction. The minimum intake administered at regimen when fluid restriction is applied is associated to the ratio between the maximum number of neonates managed pharmacologically and number of admitted < 29 weeks' GA newborns. CONCLUSION: Our survey shows an extreme variability among centers in terms of use of fluid restriction as a prophylactic tool but also in terms of its use (both opportunity and modality) when a hemodynamically significant PDA is diagnosed. This variability, that can be also found in randomized trials and observational studies, suggests that further evidence is needed to better understand its potential beneficial effects and its potential harms such as dehydration, hypotension, decreased end-organ perfusion, and reduced caloric intake. WHAT IS KNOWN: • The lack of demonstrable improvement following the treatment of patent ductus arteriosus has recently paved the way to a more conservative approach. • Fluid restriction is the most commonly applied conservative treatment of PDA. WHAT IS NEW: • Among Italian NICUs an extreme variability in terms of indications, timing and modalities of application of Fluid restriction can be found. • This variability reflects the lack of standardization of this practice and the contrasting evidence on its efficacy.

A Systematic Review: Is Early Fluid Restriction in Preterm Neonates Going to Prevent Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia?

Preterm birth causes constant challenges, with bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) being a major concern. Immediately after birth, it takes time to establish feeding between the mother and the premature baby. During this time, the telological shifting of fluid from extracellular space to intracellular space will help the baby; this transition should be smooth. Both normal physiologic changes and pathophysiologic events are capable of disrupting this delicate fluid shifting that occurs in very low-birth-weight infants during the first week of life. The immaturity of the renal system and evaporative losses complicate this process. This lack of fluid displacement can be associated with an increased amount of water in the lungs and reduced lung compliance. This can lead to the need for more ventilatory support and a higher oxygen requirement, which, in turn, leads to lung damage. The fluid restriction is also associated with complications such as severe dehydration, intracranial hemorrhage, and bilirubin toxicity. However, the administration of large amounts of fluid and salt is associated with an increased incidence of patent ductus arteriosus, BPD, necrotizing enterocolitis, and intraventricular hemorrhage. There were studies conducted in both the pre-surfactant and surfactant eras that were inconclusive regarding fluid restriction in BPD. We only included very recent studies. This systematic review attempts to summarize the current evidence, focusing on the efficacy and safety of early fluid management in preterm infants. This reduces the risk of BPD and improves outcomes for premature infants. As we know, intact survival is very important. Our review supported the early fluid restriction.

Hypertonic saline versus fluid restriction: The pitfalls in managing acute hyponatremia in a patient with long-standing spinal cord injury.

Spinal cord injury-induced hyponatremia is an under-recognized entity, without a mention in the European hyponatremia guidelines. We present a case of a 56-year-old female quadraplegic patient with cervical cord injury, presenting with severe hyponatremia and tonic-clonic seizures. This case highlights the challenges in medical management; action mechanisms are further discussed.

Influence of Obesity and Fluid Balance on Operative Outcomes in Hepatic Resection.

As the number of obese patients requiring hepatic resection is increasing, efforts to understand their operative risk and determine proper perioperative management are necessary. A total of 175 patients who underwent hepatic resection between March 2015 and July 2021 were evaluated. The patients were divided into two groups by their body mass index (BMI) using the World Health Organization definition of obesity for Asians: obese patients (BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2, n = 84) and non-obese patients (BMI < 25 kg/m2, n = 91). The operative duration (195.7 ± 62.9 min vs. 176.0 ± 53.6 min, p = 0.027) was longer and related to a higher estimated blood loss (EBL) ≥ 500 mL (61.9% vs. 40.7%, p = 0.005) in the obese patients than in the non-obese patients. Obesity (odds ratio (OR), 2.204; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.177−4.129; p = 0.014) and central venous pressure (CVP) ≥ 5 (OR, 2.733; 95% CI, 1.445−5.170; p = 0.002) at the start of the surgery were significant risk factors for EBL ≥ 500 mL. Obese patients with low CVP showed significantly lower EBL than those with high CVP, but a similar EBL to non-obese patients (p = 0.003). In conclusion, fluid restriction before hepatic resection would be important, especially in obese patients, to improve their operative outcomes.

Fluid Overload.

Volume overload is a common complication of a multitude of disease states, as well as a complication of many medical therapies. For the critically ill patient in the intensive care unit, volume overload is especially concerning when persistent past the first few days of admission. In the setting of chronic kidney disease, the maintenance of fluid balance presents additional challenges. This article focuses on the causes of volume overload as well as treatment options of the critically ill patient, including the nuances of the kidney patient, and ends with outpatient guidelines and recommendations to avoid recurrence.

Postoperative fluid restriction to prevent hyponatremia after transsphenoidal pituitary surgery: An updated meta-analysis and critique.

BACKGROUND: Hyponatremia is a common and potentially dangerous complication of transsphenoidal surgery. Prophylactic postoperative fluid restriction has been trialled as a method to reduce the incidence of postoperative hyponatremia. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was performed in accordance with the PRISMA statement. Risk of bias was assessed using the MINORS criteria. Meta-analysis was performed using the random-effects model. RESULTS: A total of 6 retrospective cohort studies were available for analysis. Fluid restriction was commonly between 1000 and 1500 ml/day and limited to the first postoperative week. Overall, the rate postoperative hyponatremia was fourfold less in the fluid restricted cohorts (3.4 % vs 11.2 %, OR 0.24 (95 %CI 0.15-0.38), p < 0.01). There was no difference in readmission rates (1.4 % vs 3.9 %, OR 0.32 (95 %CI 0.09-1.13), p = 0.08) or postoperative diabetes insipidus (14.5 % vs 18.6 %, OR 0.82 (95 %CI 0.50-1.36), p = 0.45) between fluid restricted and control cohorts. CONCLUSION: Prophylactic postoperative fluid restriction is a cheap, easily implemented intervention that appears to reduce the rate of postoperative hyponatremia, but not necessarily re-admission rates. Whether these prevented cases of hyponatremia are clinically significant remains to be demonstrated.

Fluid REStriction in Heart Failure vs Liberal Fluid UPtake: Rationale and Design of the Randomized FRESH-UP Study.

AIMS: It is common practice for clinicians to advise fluid restriction in patients with heart failure (HF), but data from clinical trials are lacking. Moreover, fluid restriction is associated with thirst distress and may adversely impact quality of life (QoL). To address this gap in evidence, the Fluid REStriction in Heart failure vs liberal fluid UPtake (FRESH-UP) study was initiated. METHODS: The FRESH-UP study is a randomized, controlled, open-label, multicenter trial to investigate the effects of a 3-month period of liberal fluid intake vs fluid restriction (1500 mL/day) on QoL in outpatients with chronic HF (New York Heart Association Classes II--III). The primary aim is to assess the effect on QoL after 3 months using the Overall Summary Score of the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ). Thirst distress, as assessed by the Thirst Distress Scale for patients with HF, KCCQ Clinical Summary Score, each of the KCCQ domains and clinically meaningful changes in these scores, the EQ-5D-5L, patient-reported fluid intake and safety (ie, death, HF hospitalizations) are secondary outcomes. The FRESH-UP study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04551729). CONCLUSION: The results of the FRESH-UP study will add substantially to the level of evidence concerning fluid management in chronic HF and may impact the QoL of these patients.

The management of acute and chronic hyponatraemia.

Hyponatraemia is the most common electrolyte abnormality encountered in clinical practice; despite this, the work-up and management of hyponatraemia remain suboptimal and varies among different specialist groups. The majority of data comparing hyponatraemia treatments have been observational, up until recently. The past two years have seen the publication of several randomised control trials investigating hyponatraemia treatments, both for chronic and acute hyponatraemia. In this article, we aim to provide a background to the physiology, cause and impact of hyponatraemia and summarise the most recent data on treatments for acute and chronic hyponatraemia, highlighting their efficacy, tolerability and adverse effects.

Effect of perioperative fluid volume restriction on the incidence of complications following pancreaticoduodenectomy.

BACKGROUND: Perioperative fluid restriction has been suggested to reduce morbidity and length of stay. The purpose of this study was to compare the morbidity following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) between fluid restriction group and conventional management group. METHODS: Seventy-two patients were enrolled for perioperative fluid restriction of PD. During the operation, main fluid was infused at a rate of less than 8 mL/kg/hr. Until POD#3, 10% dextrose and Hartmann's solution were administered at rates of 40 mL/h and {(1.5*body weight) - 42} mL/h, respectively. The historical control group consisted of 139 patients. We compared the rates of major complication (Clavien-Dindo grade III to V) and clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF), length of hospital stays (LOS), amount of urine output, and the rate of acute kidney injury (AKI). RESULTS: The rates of major complication (19.0% versus 18.7%; p > 0.999), CR-POPF (15.5% versus 15.1%; p > 0.999), and LOS (19 days [range: 10-52] versus 19 days [range: 11-75]; p = 0.514) were comparable in the study and the control group, respectively. Amount of urine output during the operation and from POD#1 to POD#3 was more than minimal amount (0.5 mL/kg/hr) in the both groups. Incidence rate of AKI in the study group was not higher than the control group (Stage I: 1.7% versus 2.9%, p > 0.999; stage II: 0% versus 1.4%, p > 0.999). CONCLUSION: There was no decrease in incidence of morbidity including POPF following PD with perioperative fluid restriction. Fluid restriction was feasible because it did not reduce urine output and did not increase incidence of AKI.