Risk Factors for Loss to Follow-up of Elderly Patients After Hip Fracture Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Introduction: Non-attendance with scheduled postoperative follow-up visits remains a common issue in orthopaedic clinical research. The objective of this study was to identify the risk factors associated with loss to follow-up among elderly patients with hip-fracture postoperatively. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 1-year post-surgery was performed on patients aged over 60 years who underwent hip-fracture surgery from January 2017 to March 2019. Based on their completion of the appointed follow-up schedule, the patients were classified into 2 groups: the Loss to Follow-up (LTFU) Group and the Follow-up (FU) Group. Clinical outcomes were evaluated by Functional Recovery Score (FRS) questionnaires. Telephone interviews were conducted with patients lost to follow-up to determine the reasons for non-attendance. A comparative analysis of baseline characteristics between the 2 groups was implemented, with further exploration of statistical differences through logistic regression. Results: A total of 992 patients met the inclusion criteria were included in this study, of which 189 patients, accounting for 19.1%, were lost to follow-up 1 year postoperatively. The mean age of the patients in the LTFU Group was 82.0 years, significantly higher than the 76.0 years observed in the FU Group (P < 0.001). The FRS for the LTFU Group was marginally higher than that of the FU group (84.0 vs 81.0), with no significant difference (P = 0.060). Logistic regression analysis identified several significant predictors of noncompliance, including advanced age at surgery, femoral neck fracture, hip arthroplasty, long distance from residence to hospital, and the reliance on urban-rural public transportation for reaching the hospital. Conclusion: Postoperative follow-up loss was prevalent among elderly patients with hip fractures. Our study indicated a constellation of risk factors contributing to noncompliance, including advanced age, transportation difficulties, long travel distance, femoral neck fracture and hip arthroplasty surgery.

Multi-Stakeholder Validation of an Entrustable Professional Activities Framework for Canadian Geriatrics Residency Programs.

Background: Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs) have become a cornerstone for an increasing number of competency-based medical education programs. Today, frameworks of EPAs are being used in most, if not all, medical specialties. These frameworks can break a discipline down to its constituting tasks, and structure the training and evaluation of residents. In 2018, The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada created an EPA framework for Geriatric Specialty residency programs nationwide. The present study aims to evaluate this EPA framework through focus groups consisting of several stakeholder groups. Methods: Participants were recruited to be part of one of five focus groups-one for each stakeholder group of interest. The five focus groups consisted of: physician faculty, residents, allied health professionals, administrators/managers, and patients. Each focus group met once virtually over ZOOM® for no longer than 90 minutes. Meeting transcripts were iteratively coded based on emerging themes, and were compared for similarities and gaps between stakeholder perspectives. Results: Multi-stakeholder consultation yielded feedback on many specific EPAs, suggestions for new EPAs, and additional input which gave rise to four themes: (i) EPA scope, (ii) Operationalization, (iii) Interprofessional Collaboration, and (iv) Patient Advocacy. Lastly, we received their thoughts on how the framework defines Geriatrics relative to the work of Care of the Elderly physicians in Canada. Conclusions: Consulting a variety of stakeholder groups generates a robust and diverse supply of feedback that holistically augments EPA frameworks to be more practical, appropriate, socially accountable and patient-centred.

Prevalence of dermatoses in geriatric singaporeans in the community - a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the prevalence of dermatoses in "skin-well" geriatric Singaporeans. We aim to identify the prevalence of dermatoses and their associations within the geriatric population in Singapore, and to understand the distribution of dermatological encounters presenting to primary care physicians, and the resultant referral behaviour. METHODS: A joint quantitative-qualitative study was performed across 8 months. Patients aged 65 years and above who visited a local polyclinic for management of non-dermatological chronic diseases were recruited. They were administered questionnaires, and underwent full skin examinations. Online surveys were disseminated to polyclinic physicians under the same healthcare cluster. RESULTS: 201 patients and 53 physicians were recruited. The most common dermatoses identified in patients were benign tumours and cysts (97.5%), and asteatosis (81.6%). For every 1-year increase in age, the odds of having asteatosis increased by 13.5% (95% CI 3.4-24.7%, p = 0.008), and urticarial disorders by 14.6% (95% CI 0.3-30.9%, p = 0.045). Patients who used any form of topical preparations on a daily basis had higher odds of having eczema and inflammatory dermatoses (OR 2.51, 95% CI 1.38 to 4.56, p = 0.003). Physicians reported dermatological conditions involving 20% of all clinical encounters. Eczema represented the most commonly reported dermatosis within the first visit. 50% of dermatology referrals were done solely at the patient's own request. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of dermatoses in the elderly in Singapore is high, especially asteatosis. Prompt recognition by the primary healthcare provider potentially prevents future morbidity. Outreach education for both primary care physicians and the general public will be key. ETHICS APPROVAL: National Healthcare group (NHG) Domain Specific Review Board (DSRB), Singapore, under Trial Registration Number 2020/00239, dated 11 August 2020.

Effect of home-based and remotely supervised combined exercise and cognitive intervention on older adults with mild cognitive impairment (COGITO): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is an intermediate phase between normal cognitive ageing and dementia and poses a serious threat to public health worldwide; however, it might be reversible, representing the best opportunity for secondary prevention against serious cognitive impairment. As a non-pharmacological intervention for those patients, interventions that combine physical exercise and cognitive training, whether delivered simultaneously or sequentially, may have superior effects on various cognitive domains, including global cognition, memory, executive function and attention. The supportive evidence remains incomplete. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of a combined exercise and cognitive intervention in Chinese older adults with mild cognitive impairment (COGITO), empowered by digital therapy and guided by the Health Action Process Model and the Theory of Planned Behaviour (HAPA-TPB theory) in a home-based setting. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study is a randomised controlled, assessor-blinded multi-centre study. Four parallel groups will include a total of 160 patients, receiving either a combined exercise and cognitive intervention, an isolated exercise intervention, an isolated cognitive intervention or only health education. These interventions will be conducted at least twice a week for 50 min each session, over 3 months. All interventions will be delivered at home and remotely monitored through RehabApp and Mini-programme, along with an arm-worn heart rate telemetry device. Specifically, supervisors will receive participants' real-time training diaries, heart rates or other online monitoring data and then provide weekly telephone calls and monthly home visits to encourage participants to complete their tasks and address any difficulties based on their training information. Eligible participants are community-dwelling patients with no regular exercise habit and diagnosed with MCI. The primary outcome is cognitive function assessed by the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive (ADAS-Cog) and Community Screening Instrument for Dementia (CSI-D), with baseline and three follow-up assessments. Secondary outcomes include quality of life, physical fitness, sleep quality, intrinsic capacity, frailty, social support, adherence, cost-effectiveness and cost-benefit. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Peking University. Research findings will be presented to stakeholders and published in peer-reviewed journals and at provincial, national and international conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR2300073900.

The legacy of Dr Marjory Warren's publications.

While the contributions of Dr Marjory W. Warren to geriatric medicine are widely acknowledged, their specifics have become obscured by the passage of time. The primary objective of this narrative review of her medical publications was to clarify the contributions she made for this field of medical practice. A total of 82 publications were found. In them Warren presented a then novel and hopeful approach to the management of older patients that included making care plans derived from comprehensive assessments, implementing team-based interventions, and ensuring continuity of care. These innovations, though, took years to implement and included what would now be considered a number of paternalistic and hierarchical aspects. Objective patient outcome data was rarely presented. While responsible for innovations that remain key to the field, some of what she proposed are either no longer possible (e.g. large in-patient units with prolonged lengths of stay) or have required modifications to align with current practice.

Initial and Long-Term Prescribing of Opioids and Non-steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs Following Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty.

Introduction: Limited evidence exists on health system characteristics associated with initial and long-term prescribing of opioids and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) following total hip and knee arthroplasty (THA/TKA), and if these characteristics differ among individuals based on preoperative NSAID exposure. We identified orthopedic surgeon opioid prescribing practices, hospital characteristics, and regional factors associated with initial and long-term prescribing of opioids and NSAIDs among older adults receiving THA/TKA. Materials and Methods: This observational study included opioid-naïve Medicare beneficiaries aged ≥65 years receiving elective THA/TKA between January 1, 2014 and July 4, 2017. We examined initial (days 1-30 following THA/TKA) and long-term (days 90-180) opioid or NSAID prescribing, stratified by preoperative NSAID exposure. Risk ratios (RRs) for the associations between 10 health system characteristics and case-mix adjusted outcomes were estimated using multivariable Poisson regression models. Results: The study population included 23,351 NSAID-naïve and 10,127 NSAID-prevalent individuals. Increases in standardized measures of orthopedic surgeon opioid prescribing generally decreased the risk of initial NSAID prescribing but increased the risk of long-term opioid prescribing. For example, among NSAID-naïve individuals, the RRs (95% confidence intervals [CIs]) for initial NSAID prescribing were 0.95 (0.93-0.97) for 1-2 orthopedic surgeon opioid prescriptions per THA/TKA procedure, 0.94 (0.92-0.97) for 3-4 prescriptions per procedure, and 0.91 (0.89-0.93) for 5+ opioid prescriptions per procedure (reference: <1 opioid prescription per procedure), while the RRs (95% CIs) for long-term opioid prescribing were 1.06 (1.04-1.08), 1.08 (1.06-1.11), and 1.13 (1.11-1.16), respectively. Variation in postoperative analgesic prescribing was observed across U.S. regions. For example, among NSAID-naïve individuals, the RR (95% CIs) for initial opioid prescribing were 0.98 (0.96-1.00) for Region 2 (New York), 1.09 (1.07-1.11) for Region 3 (Philadelphia), 1.07 (1.05-1.10) for Region 4 (Atlanta), 1.03 (1.01-1.05) for Region 5 (Chicago), 1.16 (1.13-1.18) for Region 6 (Dallas), 1.10 (1.08-1.12) for Region 7 (Kansas City), 1.09 (1.06-1.12) for Region 8 (Denver), 1.09 (1.07-1.12) for Region 9 (San Francisco), and 1.11 (1.08-1.13) for Region 10 (Seattle) (reference: Region 1 [Boston]). Hospital characteristics were not meaningfully associated with postoperative analgesic prescribing. The relationships between health system characteristics and postoperative analgesic prescribing were similar for NSAID-naïve and NSAID-prevalent participants. Discussion: Future efforts aiming to improve the use of multimodal analgesia through increased NSAID prescribing and reduced long-term opioid prescribing following THA/TKA could consider targeting orthopedic surgeons with higher standardized opioid prescribing measures. Conclusions: Orthopedic surgeon opioid prescribing measures and U.S. region were the greatest health system level predictors of initial, and long-term, prescribing of opioids and prescription NSAIDs among older Medicare beneficiaries following THA/TKA. These results can inform future studies that examine why variation in analgesic prescribing exists across geographic regions and levels of orthopedic surgeon opioid prescribing.

Cross-Sectional Study Comparing Activities of Daily Living Using Barthel Index Within a Geriatric Population Having Non-Communicable Diseases.

Introduction Disabilities and non-communicable diseases (NCDs) are prevalent among the elderly, significantly affecting their quality of life. Comprehensive population-based data are essential for effective healthcare planning and rehabilitation. This study aims to determine the prevalence of self-reported disabilities and compare Barthel Index scores among elderly individuals with and without NCDs. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted at Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Pune, involving 102 patients aged 60 years and above. Patients with a history of strokes or limb amputations were excluded. Data on demographics, comorbidities, and functional status were collected using a structured questionnaire designed based on Barthel Index scoring to assess the activities of daily living (ADL). Results The study included 102 participants: 58 males (56.9%) and 44 females (43.1%). Age distribution showed 73.5% in the 60-74 age group, 22.5% in the 75-84 age group, and 3.9% in the 85+ age group. Comorbidity data revealed that 37.3% had no comorbidities, 26.4% had one comorbidity, and 36.3% had two or more comorbidities. The mean Barthel Index scores were 87.11 for those without comorbidities, 83.89 for those with one comorbidity, and 82.30 for those with two or more comorbidities. The most affected activities were stair climbing (75.7%), bowel control (48.5%), and mobility (47.1%). Conclusion NCDs significantly impact daily activities in the elderly, underscoring the need for targeted healthcare interventions to improve their quality of life. This study highlights the importance of comprehensive care strategies to address the specific needs of elderly patients with comorbidities.

A 10-Year Experience of an Integrated Geriatric Hip Fracture Treatment Protocol: Outcomes at a Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up.

Introduction: Increasing incidence of fragility fractures has spurred development of protocols, largely focused on peri-operative care, with numerous proven benefits. The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate outcomes of our hip fracture treatment program regarding successful protocol implementation, compliance, effect on subsequent fracture rates, and mortality during the first decade of adoption. Methods: A retrospective review identified patients >65 years old with fragility hip fractures between 2010 and 2022. The HiROC (+) cohort consisted of patients who received a "High-Risk Osteoporosis Clinic" (HiROC) referral for bone health evaluation and bisphosphonate initiation as indicated. Additional fracture rates and mortality at 3 years were calculated. Protocol implementation and compliance over the first 10 years was analyzed in the four identified cohorts. Results: A total of 1671 fragility hip fractures were identified, with 386 excluded due to insufficient follow-up, with an average age of 81.6 years and a median follow-up of 36.4 months. Of the 1280 included cases, 56% (n = 717) had a HiROC referral placed. HiROC(+) groups had lower subsequent fracture rates at two years, compared to those without referral (28% vs 13%, P < 0.0001) and those completing more steps of the protocol had lower subsequent fracture rates (28% vs 15% vs 13% vs 5%, P < 0.0001). No statistically significant difference was observed between the cohorts for anatomic site of subsequent fractures. Discussion: Greater than half of all eligible patients were successfully captured by the protocol. Patients completing more steps of the protocol had lower subsequent fracture rates. Captured patients demonstrated reduced mortality rates when compared to current literature. Conclusion: Successful implementation of this geriatric hip fracture protocol was associated with reduced additional fractures and mortality rates. Identifying steps of process failures in the protocol can provide opportunities for increased compliance and reduction in future fracture occurrences.

DOSAGE study: protocol for a phase III non-inferiority randomised trial investigating dose-reduced chemotherapy for advanced colorectal cancer in older patients.

INTRODUCTION: Treating older adults with chemotherapy remains a challenge, given their under-representation in clinical trials and the lack of robust treatment guidelines for this population. Moreover, older patients, especially those with frailty, have an increased risk of developing chemotherapy-related toxicity, resulting in a decreased quality of life (QoL), increased hospitalisations and high healthcare costs. Phase II trials have suggested that upfront dose reduction of chemotherapy can reduce toxicity rates while maintaining efficacy, leading to fewer treatment discontinuations and an improved QoL. The DOSAGE aims to show that upfront dose-reduced chemotherapy in older patients with metastatic colorectal cancer is non-inferior to full-dose treatment in terms of progression-free survival (PFS), with adaption of the treatment plan (monotherapy or doublet chemotherapy) based on expected risk of treatment toxicity. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The DOSAGE study is an investigator-initiated phase III, open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial in patients aged≥70 years with metastatic colorectal cancer eligible for palliative chemotherapy. Based on toxicity risk, assessed using the Geriatric 8 (G8) tool, patients will be stratified to either doublet chemotherapy (fluoropyrimidine with oxaliplatin) or fluoropyrimidine monotherapy. Patients classified as low risk will be randomised between a fluoropyrimidine plus oxaliplatin in either full-dose or with an upfront dose reduction of 25%. Patients classified as high risk will be randomised between fluoropyrimidine monotherapy in either full-dose or with an upfront dose reduction. In the dose-reduced arm, dose escalation after two cycles is allowed. The primary outcome is PFS. Secondary endpoints include grade≥3 toxicity, QoL, physical functioning, number of treatment cycles, dose reductions, hospital admissions, overall survival, cumulative received dosage and cost-effectiveness. Considering a median PFS of 8 months and non-inferiority margin of 8 weeks, we shall include 587 patients. The study will be enrolled in 36 Dutch Hospitals, with enrolment scheduled to start in July 2024. This study will provide new evidence regarding the effect of dose-reduced chemotherapy on survival and treatment outcomes, as well as the use of the G8 to choose between doublet chemotherapy or monotherapy. Results will contribute to a more individualised approach in older patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, potentially leading to improved QoL while maintaining survival benefits. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This trial has received ethical approval by the ethical committee Leiden Den Haag Delft (P24.018) and will be approved by the Institutional Ethical Committee of the participating institutions. The results will be disseminated in peer-reviewed scientific journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT06275958.

A systematic review of fall prediction models for community-dwelling older adults: comparison between models based on research cohorts and models based on routinely collected data.

BACKGROUND: Prediction models can identify fall-prone individuals. Prediction models can be based on either data from research cohorts (cohort-based) or routinely collected data (RCD-based). We review and compare cohort-based and RCD-based studies describing the development and/or validation of fall prediction models for community-dwelling older adults. METHODS: Medline and Embase were searched via Ovid until January 2023. We included studies describing the development or validation of multivariable prediction models of falls in older adults (60+). Both risk of bias and reporting quality were assessed using the PROBAST and TRIPOD, respectively. RESULTS: We included and reviewed 28 relevant studies, describing 30 prediction models (23 cohort-based and 7 RCD-based), and external validation of two existing models (one cohort-based and one RCD-based). The median sample sizes for cohort-based and RCD-based studies were 1365 [interquartile range (IQR) 426-2766] versus 90 441 (IQR 56 442-128 157), and the ranges of fall rates were 5.4% to 60.4% versus 1.6% to 13.1%, respectively. Discrimination performance was comparable between cohort-based and RCD-based models, with the respective area under the receiver operating characteristic curves ranging from 0.65 to 0.88 versus 0.71 to 0.81. The median number of predictors in cohort-based final models was 6 (IQR 5-11); for RCD-based models, it was 16 (IQR 11-26). All but one cohort-based model had high bias risks, primarily due to deficiencies in statistical analysis and outcome determination. CONCLUSIONS: Cohort-based models to predict falls in older adults in the community are plentiful. RCD-based models are yet in their infancy but provide comparable predictive performance with no additional data collection efforts. Future studies should focus on methodological and reporting quality.

Potentially inappropriate medication as a predictor of poor prognosis of COVID-19 in older adults: a South Korean nationwide cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the association between exposure to potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) and poor prognosis of COVID-19 in older adults, controlling for comorbidity and sociodemographic factors. DESIGN AND SETTING: Nationwide retrospective cohort study based on the national registry of COVID-19 patients, established through the linkage of South Korea's national insurance claims database with the Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency registry of patients with COVID-19, up to 31 July 2020. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 2217 COVID-19 patients over 60 years of age who tested positive between 20 January 2022 and 4 June 2020. Exposure to PIM was defined based on any prescription record of PIM during the 30 days prior to the date of testing positive for COVID-19. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Mortality and utilisation of critical care from the date of testing positive until the end of isolation. RESULTS: Among the 2217 COVID-19 patients over 60 years of age, 604 were exposed to PIM prior to infection. In the matched cohort of 583 pairs, PIM-exposed individuals exhibited higher rates of mortality (19.7% vs 9.8%, p<0.0001) and critical care utilisation (13.4% vs 8.9%, p=0.0156) compared with non-exposed individuals. The temporal association of PIM exposure with mortality was significant across all age groups (RR=1.68, 95% CI: 1.23~2.24), and a similar trend was observed for critical care utilisation (RR: 1.75, 95% CI: 1.26~2.39). The risk of mortality and critical care utilisation increased with exposure to a higher number of PIMs in terms of active pharmaceutical ingredients and drug categories. CONCLUSION: Exposure to PIM exacerbates the poor outcomes of older patients with COVID-19 who are already at high risk. Effective interventions are urgently needed to address PIM exposure and improve health outcomes in this vulnerable population.

Demographic, socioeconomic and health determinants of depressive symptoms in adults 50 years and older from Mexico: a secondary data longitudinal analysis from the Mexican Health and Aging Study.

BACKGROUND: Depression in ageing adults is a public health problem. Worldwide studies have identified social and health risk factors for depressive symptoms. However, little is known about their longitudinal determinants in Mexico. OBJECTIVES AND SETTING: To find the prevalence of depressive symptoms and their longitudinal individual and contextual risk factors in Mexican adults aged 50 and older. DESIGN: Secondary data of 6460 persons aged 50 years and older from the Mexican Health and Aging Study were analysed using a 'between-within' panel data analysis approach. RESULTS: The prevalence of depressive symptoms increased from 35% in 2003 to 38% in 2015. The significantly longitudinal factors associated with these symptoms were getting older (OR 1.02, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.03), being a woman (OR 2.39, 95% CI 2.16 to 2.64), less time spent in formal education (0 years and less than 6 years OR 1.52, 95% CI 1.32 to 1.75 and OR 1.33, 95% CI 1.19 to 1.50, respectively), lower net worth (OR 1.13, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.17), being recently unemployed (OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.25), increased (OR 1.17, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.25) or increasing number (OR 1.23, 95% CI 1.15 to 1.31) of chronic conditions, poor (OR 4.68, 95% CI 4.26 to 5.15) or worsened (OR 1.71, 95% CI 1.61 to 1.81) self-rated health and having impairments on instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs) (OR 2.94 95% CI 2.35 to 3.67) or a new IADL impairment (OR 1.67, 95% CI 1.48 to 1.89), as well as having impairments on ADLs (OR 1.51, 95% CI 1.23 to 1.86) or a new ADL impairment (OR 1.34, 95% CI 1.21 to 1.48). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of depressive symptoms in Mexican adults aged 50 and older is high. Our findings show that they are longitudinally associated with the individual's demographic, socioeconomic, health and disability characteristics. Efforts in public policy should focus on preventing chronic conditions and disability, as well as fighting inequalities to reduce the prevalence of depressive symptoms.

Comparing COVID-19 vaccination coverage, adverse reactions and impact of social determinants of health on vaccine hesitancy in ADRD/MCI and non-ADRD/MCI population: protocol for a retrospective cross-sectional study.

INTRODUCTION: COVID-19 vaccination is crucial for vulnerable people with underlying chronic conditions such as Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI). These individuals face unique challenges, including higher risk of COVID-19, difficulties in adopting preventive behaviours and vaccine hesitancy due to concerns about adverse reactions. Therefore, efforts to promote vaccination, including boosters tailored to the currently circulating virus, are essential for people with ADRD/MCI. OBJECTIVE: The primary purpose of this study protocol is to conduct a comprehensive analysis of COVID-19 vaccination coverage and adverse reactions among individuals with ADRD/MCI in comparison to those without ADRD/MCI. Additionally, the proposed study aims to investigate the impact of social determinants of health on COVID-19 vaccination and vaccine hesitancy in individuals with ADRD/MCI. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A retrospective cross-sectional study will be conducted utilising data from the All of Us (AoU) Researcher Workbench. Relevant data fields are extracted from sources including demographic information, COVID-19 Vaccine Survey, Basic Survey, Health Access & Utilization, Social Determinants of Health, and Electronic Health Record (EHR) data. Data on vaccination, adverse reactions and vaccine hesitancy will be collected through COVID-19 vaccine survey questionnaires. Propensity score matching and binary logistic regression will be applied to assess the vaccination rates and vaccine hesitancy, while controlling for demographic characteristics and social determinants of health factors. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study protocol received approval from the Institutional Review Board at Florida State University (STUDY00004571). Results will be disseminated through publication in peer-reviewed journals and presented at scientific conferences.

Assessing the impact of frailty in elderly patients undergoing emergency laparotomies in Singapore.

Introduction: The global rise in ageing populations poses challenges for healthcare systems. By 2030, Singapore anticipates a quarter of its population to be aged 65 or older. This study addresses the dearth of research on frailty's impact on emergency laparotomy (EL) outcomes in this demographic, emphasising the growing significance of this surgical intervention. Method: Conducted at 2 tertiary centres in Singapore from January to December 2019, a retrospective cohort study examined EL outcomes in patients aged 65 or older. Frailty assessment, using the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS), was integrated into demographic, diagnostic and procedural analyses. Patient data from Tan Tock Seng Hospital and Khoo Teck Puat Hospital provided a comprehensive view of frailty's role in EL. Results: Among 233 participants, 26% were frail, revealing a higher vulnerability in the geriatric population. Frail individuals exhibited elevated preoperative risk, prolonged ICU stays, and significantly higher 90-day mortality (21.3% versus 6.4%). The study illuminated a nuanced connection between frailty and adverse outcomes, underlining the critical need for robust predictive tools in this context. Conclusion: Frailty emerged as a pivotal factor influencing the postoperative trajectory of older adults undergoing EL in Singapore. The integration of frailty assessment, particularly when combined with established metrics like P-POSSUM, showcased enhanced predictive accuracy. This finding offers valuable insights for shared decision-making and acute surgical unit practices, emphasising the imperative of considering frailty in the management of older patients undergoing emergency laparotomy.

Association between continuity of care and inappropriate prescribing in outpatient care in Germany: a cross-sectional analysis conducted as part of the LoChro trial.

OBJECTIVES: Potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) and potential prescribing omissions (PPOs) are common in multimorbid patients. This study aims to describe PIMs and PPOs in an open-access outpatient setting and to investigate any association between continuity of care (CoC) and PIMs and PPOs in multimorbid older patients. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study using patient-confirmed outpatient medication plans to describe PIMs and PPOs using the 'Screening Tool of Older Person's Prescription/Screening Tool to Alert to Right Treatment' version 2. Four Poisson regressions modelled the number of PIMs and PPOs using context-adapted versions of the Usual Provider of Care (UPC) and the Modified Modified Continuity Index (MMCI) as measures for CoC. SETTING: Southern Germany, outpatient setting. PARTICIPANTS: 321 participants of the LoChro-trial at 12-month follow-up (both arms). The LoChro-trial compared healthcare involving an additional care manager with usual care. Inclusion criteria were age over 64, local residence and scoring over one in the Identification of Older patients at Risk Screening Tool. PRIMARY OUTCOMES: Numbers of PIMs and PPOs. RESULTS: The mean number of PIMs was 1.5 (SD 1.5), lower than the average number of PPOs at 2.9 (SD 1.7). CoC showed similar results for both indices with a mean of 0.548 (SD 0.279) for MMCI and 0.514 (SD 0.262) for UPC. Both models predicting PPOs indicated more PPOs with higher CoC; statistical significance was only demonstrated for MMCI (MMCI~PPO: Exp(B)=1.42, 95% CI (1.11; 1.81), p=0.004; UPC~PPO: Exp(B)=1.29, 95% CI (0.99; 1.67), p=0.056). No significant association between PIMs and CoC was found (MMCI~PIM: Exp(B)=0.72, 95% CI (0.50; 1.03), p=0.072; UPC~PIM: Exp(B)=0.83, 95% CI (0.57; 1.21), p=0.337). CONCLUSION: The results did not show a significant association between higher CoC and lesser PIMs. Remarkably, an association between increased CoC, represented through MMCI, and more PPOs was found. Consultation of different care providers in open-access healthcare systems could possibly ameliorate under-prescribing in multimorbid older patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS): DRKS00013904.

An Unusual Case of Abdominal Pain in a Geriatric Man.

BACKGROUND: Immunoglobulin A vasculitis, historically known as Henoch-Schönlein purpura, is a rare form of autoimmune-induced vasculitis most common in children. This disease is characterized by a purpuric rash, arthritis, digestive tract complication, and renal inflammation (Hopkins). CASE REPORT: We present the case of a 78-year-old man in the emergency department with findings of weakness, abdominal pain, and bloody diarrhea for 3 days and a new-onset bilateral lower extremity rash. Diagnostic imaging and labs diagnosed this patient with immunoglobulin A vasculitis (IgAV) with associated acute kidney injury and abdominal mesenteric edema. Why Should an Emergency Physician be Aware of This? Recognition of IgAV by emergency physicians and assessment of multiple organ involvement is critical to expedite treatment and minimize complications. Particularly, physicians should consider and recognize the increased severity and different presentation of IgAV in adults in comparison with the more widely known manifestation in children.

Addressing inequalities in the perioperative care for older adults.

Older adults constitute a large proportion of patients undergoing surgery and present with complexity, predisposing them to adverse postoperative outcomes. Inequalities exist in the provision of surgical care across the United Kingdom evidenced by increased waiting times in areas of social deprivation, a disparity in the provision of surgical care across geographic locations as well as a variation in the medical management of comorbidities in surgical patients. Addressing inequalities in the delivery of perioperative care for older adults necessitates a multi-faceted approach. It requires implementation of an evidence-based approach to optimisation of older surgical adults using Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment and optimisation methodology at scale, development of an age-attuned, flexible, transdisciplinary workforce, a restructuring of funding to commission services addressing the needs of the older surgical population and a change in culture and professional and public understanding of the needs of the older surgical patient.

Cross-sectional study of cognitive impairment and visual impairment among the elderly population in residential care in India: the Hyderabad Ocular Morbidity in Elderly Study (HOMES).

OBJECTIVE: To report the relationship between visual impairment (VI) and cognitive impairment (CI) among the older population living in residential care homes in Hyderabad, India. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: 41 homes for the aged centres in the Hyderabad region. PARTICIPANTS: 965 participants aged ≥60 years from homes for the aged centres. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Visual impairment and cognitive impairment. METHODS: The Hindi mini-Mental Status Examination (HMSE) questionnaire was used to assess the cognitive function. The final HMSE score was calculated after excluding vision-dependent tasks (HMSE-VI). A detailed eye examination was conducted, including visual acuity (VA) measurement for distance and near vision, using a standard logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution chart under good illumination. CI was defined as having a HMSE-VI score of ≤17. VI was defined as presenting VA worse than 6/12 in the better-seeing eye. Near VI (NVI) was defined as binocular presenting near vision worse than N8 and distance VA of 6/18 or better in the better-seeing eye. Multiple logistic regression was done to assess the association between VI and CI. RESULTS: The mean age (±SD) was 74.3 (±8.3) years (range: 60-97 years). There were 612 (63.4%) women, and 593 (61.5%) had a school education. In total, 260 (26.9%; 95% confidence intervals: 24.2 to 29.9) participants had CI. The prevalence of CI among those with VI was 40.5% compared with 14.6% among those without VI (p<0.01). The logistic regression analysis showed that the participants with VI for distance vision had three times higher odds of having CI (OR 3.09; 95% confidence intervals: 2.13 to 4.47; p<0.01). Similarly, participants with NVI had two times higher odds of having CI (OR 2.11; 95% confidence intervals: 1.36 to 3.29; p<0.01) after adjusting for other covariates. CONCLUSIONS: CI was highly prevalent among those with distance and near VI. VI was independently and positively associated with CI after adjusting for potential confounders. Interventions can be planned to address VI in this vulnerable population which could have a ripple effect in preventing cognitive decline.

Trajectories in long-term condition accumulation and mortality in older adults: a group-based trajectory modelling approach using the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing.

OBJECTIVES: To classify older adults into clusters based on accumulating long-term conditions (LTC) as trajectories, characterise clusters and quantify their associations with all-cause mortality. DESIGN: We conducted a longitudinal study using the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing over 9 years (n=15 091 aged 50 years and older). Group-based trajectory modelling was used to classify people into clusters based on accumulating LTC over time. Derived clusters were used to quantify the associations between trajectory memberships, sociodemographic characteristics and all-cause mortality by conducting regression models. RESULTS: Five distinct clusters of accumulating LTC trajectories were identified and characterised as: 'no LTC' (18.57%), 'single LTC' (31.21%), 'evolving multimorbidity' (25.82%), 'moderate multimorbidity' (17.12%) and 'high multimorbidity' (7.27%). Increasing age was consistently associated with a larger number of LTCs. Ethnic minorities (adjusted OR=2.04; 95% CI 1.40 to 3.00) were associated with the 'high multimorbidity' cluster. Higher education and paid employment were associated with a lower likelihood of progression over time towards an increased number of LTCs. All the clusters had higher all-cause mortality than the 'no LTC' cluster. CONCLUSIONS: The development of multimorbidity in the number of conditions over time follows distinct trajectories. These are determined by non-modifiable (age, ethnicity) and modifiable factors (education and employment). Stratifying risk through clustering will enable practitioners to identify older adults with a higher likelihood of worsening LTC over time to tailor effective interventions to prevent mortality.