Totally laparoscopic surgery for choledochal cysts with hand­sewn Roux­en­Y reconstruction in a pediatric population.

Cyst excision and Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy (RYHJ) is the standard treatment for choledochal cysts (CCs). In the present study, the results of totally laparoscopic surgery for CCs (TLCCs) in a pediatric population were evaluated. The clinical data of 28 children with CCs between June 2020 and June 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. All patients underwent TLCCs involving cyst excision and RYHJ. The jejunojejunal anastomosis was completed laparoscopically using manual sutures. Age at operation, operative time, postoperative recovery and complications were evaluated. The 28 patients comprised 8 boys and 20 girls who underwent TLCCs at a mean age of 4.2 years (range, 1 month-12.3 years) with a mean weight of 15.9 kg (range, 4.6-43 kg). All patients received ultrasound and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography examinations, which revealed a mean cyst diameter and length of 1.74±0.76 cm and 3.85±1.25 cm, respectively. The mean operative time was 214±43.8 min. The mean time until starting an oral diet after surgery was 2.89±1.23 days. Apart from bile leakage and wound infection, no other complications occurred during a median follow-up period of 18 months (range, 4-42 months). TLCCs can be performed safely by skilled surgeons in pediatric patients. TLCCs may be more physiologically compatible and accelerate recovery of intestinal function with reduced trauma and better esthetic outcomes than conventional laparoscopic surgery for CCs. Therefore, TLCCs with manual sutures may be considered as an option for minimally invasive surgery in pediatric patients with CCs.

Stapled versus hand-sewn anastomoses after bowel resection in patients with crohn disease.

BACKGROUND: Anastomosis configuration is an essential step in treatment to restore continuity of the gastrointestinal tract following bowel resection in patients with Crohn's disease (CD). However, the association between anastomotic type and surgical outcome remains controversial. This retrospective study aimed to compare early postoperative complications and surgical outcome between stapler and handsewn anastomosis after bowel resection in Crohn's disease. METHODS: Between 2001 and 2018, a total of 339 CD patients underwent bowel resection with anastomosis. Patient characteristics, intraoperative data, early postoperative complications, and outcomes were analyzed and compared between two groups of patients. Group 1 consisted of patients with stapler anastomosis and group 2 with handsewn anastomosis. RESULTS: No significant difference was found in the incidence of postoperative surgical complications between the stapler and handsewn anastomosis groups (25% versus 24.4%, p = 1.000). Reoperation for complications and postoperative hospital stay were similar between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Our analysis showed that there were no differences in anastomotic leak, nor postoperative complications, mortality, reoperation for operative complications, or postoperative hospital stay between the stapler anastomosis and handsewn anastomosis groups.

[Short-term outcomes of mechanical and hand-sewn laparoscopic one-anastomosis mini-gastric bypass]. / Sravnitel'naya otsenka blizhaishikh rezul'tatov laparoskopicheskogo minigastroshuntirovaniya s apparatnym i manual'nym sposobami formirovaniya gastroeyunoanastomoza.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the short-term outcomes of mechanical and hand-sewn laparoscopic one-anastomosis mini-gastric bypass. MATERIAL AND METHODS: There were 233 patients who underwent laparoscopic one-anastomosis mini-gastric bypass. Short-term results were analyzed in groups of mechanical (the first group, n=108) and hand-sewn (the second group, n=125) gastrojejunostomy. No significant between-group differences in baseline data were detected (demographic characteristics, body mass index, comorbidity and previous abdominal surgeries). RESULTS: Surgery time and blood loss were similar in both groups. Intraoperative morbidity was 7.2-10.2% (p=0.485). All complications required no surgical conversion (Satava-Kazaryan grade I). Overall postoperative morbidity was 16.0-21.3% (p=0.314). Most events corresponded to Accordion grade I and had no significant effect on hospital-stay. CONCLUSION: This study revealed no significant differences in short-term outcomes after laparoscopic one-anastomosis gastric bypass with mechanical and hand-sewn gastrojejunostomy. Further study of long-term clinical outcomes is necessary.

Meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of pancreatic stump closure using a hand-sewn or stapler technique in distal pancreatectomy.

This study aimed to compare outcomes of hand-sewn and stapler closure techniques of pancreatic stump in patients undergoing distal pancreatectomy (DP). Impact of stapler closure reinforcement using mesh on outcomes was also evaluated. Literature search was carried out using multiple data sources to identify studies that compared hand-sewn and stapler closure techniques in management of pancreatic stump following DP. Odds ratio (OR) was determined for clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) via random-effects modelling. Subsequently, trial sequential analysis was performed. Thirty-two studies with a total of 4,022 patients undergoing DP with hand-sewn (n = 1,184) or stapler (n = 2,838) closure technique of pancreatic stump were analyzed. Hand-sewn closure significantly increased the risk of clinically relevant POPF compared to stapler closure (OR: 1.56, p = 0.02). When stapler closure was considered, staple line reinforcement significantly reduced formation of such POPF (OR: 0.54, p = 0.002). When only randomized controlled trials were considered, there was no significant difference in clinically relevant POPF between hand-sewn and stapler closure techniques (OR: 1.20, p = 0.64) or between reinforced and standard stapler closure techniques (OR: 0.50, p = 0.08). When observational studies were considered, hand-sewn closure was associated with a significantly higher rate of clinically relevant POPF compared to stapler closure (OR: 1.59, p = 0.03). Moreover, when stapler closure was considered, staple line reinforcement significantly reduced formation of such POPF (OR: 0.55, p = 0.02). Trial sequential analysis detected risk of type 2 error. In conclusion, reinforced stapler closure in DP may reduce risk of clinically relevant POPF compared to hand-sewn closure or stapler closure without reinforcement. Future randomized research is needed to provide stronger evidence.

Long-term prognosis after stapled and hand-sewn ileal pouch-anal anastomoses for familial adenomatous polyposis: a multicenter retrospective study.

PURPOSE: The long-term prognosis of stapled and hand-sewn ileal pouch-anal anastomoses in familial adenomatous polyposis patients in Japan remains unknown. This study aimed to compare the overall survival in familial adenomatous polyposis patients who underwent stapled or hand-sewn ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. METHODS: This multicenter retrospective study was conducted at 12 institutions in Shizuoka Prefecture, Japan. The clinical outcomes of 53 eligible familial adenomatous polyposis patients who underwent stapled (n = 24) and hand-sewn (n = 29) ileal pouch-anal anastomosis were compared. RESULTS: The median follow-up duration was 171.5 months. The incidence of adenoma in the remnant rectum or anal transitional zone and metachronous rectal cancer was significantly more common in stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (adenoma: stapled, 45.8%, vs. hand-sewn, 10.3%, p = 0.005; metachronous rectal cancer: 29.2%, vs. none, p = 0.002). The number of deaths was remarkably higher in stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (p = 0.002). Metachronous rectal cancer was the most common cause of death. Overall survival was worse in stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomosis than in hand-sewn ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (120 months, 90.7% vs. 96.6%; 240 months, 63.7% vs. 96.6%; p = 0.044). Cox regression analysis revealed the independent effects of preoperative advanced colorectal cancer and stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomosis on overall survival. CONCLUSION: Stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomosis negatively affected the overall survival of familial adenomatous polyposis patients. Therefore, hand-sewn ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is recommended for better prognosis in these patients.

Application of hand-sewn esophagojejunostomy in laparoscopic total gastrectomy.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the clinical efficacy and prognostic implication of hand-sewn anastomosis in laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG). METHODS: Retrospective analysis is adopted to the clinicopathologic data of 112 patients with gastric cancer (GC) who went through LTG in the Department of General Surgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University between October 2020 and October 2022. Among them, 60 individuals receiving medical care were split into the hand-sewn anastomosis group (Group H, N = 60); while, 52 individuals were split into the circular stapler anastomosis group (Group C, N = 52) The clinical efficacy and prognostic conditions of hand-sewn anastomosis are compared with those of circular stapler anastomosis in the application of LTG. RESULTS: The analysis results indicated that no notable difference was observed in intraoperative bleeding volume, time to first flatus (TFF), postoperative hospitalization duration and postoperative complications among the two groups (P > 0.05). Group H had shorter esophagojejunal anastomosis duration (20.0 min vs. 35.0 min) and surgery duration (252.6 ± 19.4 min vs. 265.9 ± 19.8 min), smaller incisions (5.0 cm vs. 10.5 cm), and lower hospitalization costs (58415.0 CNY vs. 63382.5 CNY) compared to Group C (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The clinical efficacy and the postoperative complications of hand-sewn esophagojejunostomy are basically equivalent in comparison to the circular stapler anastomosis in the application of LTG. Its advantage lies in shorter esophagojejunal anastomosis duration, shorter surgery duration, smaller incisions, lower hospitalization costs and wider adaptability of the location of the tumor.

Ausencia de toracotomía mediante la sutura manual intratorácica y la extracción transabdominal de la pieza quirúrgica durante la esofagectomía robótica de Ivor Lewis / Absence of thoracotomy by intrathoracic manual suture and transabdominal removal of surgical specimen during Ivor Lewis robotic esophagectomy

En el tratamiento quirúrgico del cáncer de esófago, la cirugía robótica permite realizar una anastomosis manual intratorácica de manera más sencilla, rápida y cómoda para el cirujano que la cirugía abierta y la cirugía mínimamente invasiva tradicional. Con ello evitamos el uso de instrumentos de autosutura, algunos de los cuales precisan una pequeña toracotomía para su introducción. No obstante, la extracción de la pieza exige la práctica de esa toracotomía, de tamaño variable, y que puede asociar dolor torácico intenso. Describimos una sencilla modificación técnica del Ivor Lewis robótico clásico que permite la extracción de la pieza quirúrgica por una mínima incisión abdominal, evitando la necesidad de fracturar costillas de forma controlada, así como las posibles secuelas de practicar una incisión en la pared torácica.(AU)

In the surgical treatment of esophageal cancer, robotic surgery allows performing an intrathoracic hand-sewn anastomosis in a simpler, faster and more comfortable way for the surgeon than open surgery and traditional minimally invasive surgery. With this, we avoid the use of self-suture instruments, some of which require a small thoracotomy for their introduction. However, the retrieval of the specimen requires the practice of this thoracotomy, of variable size, that can be associated with intense chest pain. We describe a technical modification of the classic robotic Ivor Lewis that allows removal of the surgical piece through a minimal abdominal incision, thus avoiding controlled rib fracture, as well as the possible sequelae of making an incision in the chest wall.(AU)

Stapled Anastomosis Versus Hand-Sewn Anastomosis With Mucosectomy for Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Postoperative Outcomes, Functional Outcomes, and Oncological Safety.

PURPOSE: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare outcomes between stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) and hand-sewn IPAA with mucosectomy in cases of ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis. METHODS: This systematic review and meta-analysis was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis) guidelines 2020 and AMSTAR 2 (Assessing the methodological quality of systematic reviews) guidelines. We included randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and controlled clinical trials (CCTs). Subgroup analysis was performed according to the indication for surgery. RESULTS: The bibliographic research yielded 31 trials: 3 RCTs, 5 prospective clinical trials, and 24 CCTs including 8872 patients: 4871 patients in the stapled group and 4038 in the hand-sewn group. Regarding postoperative outcomes, the stapled group had a lower rate of anastomotic stricture, small bowel obstruction, and ileal pouch failure. There were no differences between the 2 groups in terms of operative time, anastomotic leak, pelvic sepsis, pouchitis, or hospital stay. For functional outcomes, the stapled group was associated with greater outcomes in terms of seepage per day and by night, pad use, night incontinence, resting pressure, and squeeze pressure. There were no differences in stool Frequency per 24h, stool frequency at night, antidiarrheal medication, sexual impotence, or length of the high-pressure zone. There was no difference between the 2 groups in terms of dysplasia and neoplasia. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to hand-sewn anastomosis, stapled ileoanal anastomosis leads to a large reduction in anastomotic stricture, small bowel obstruction, ileal pouch failure, seepage by day and night, pad use, and night incontinence. This may ensure a higher resting pressure and squeeze pressure in manometry evaluation. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION: The protocol was registered at PROSPERO under CRD 42022379880.

Absence of thoracotomy by intrathoracic manual suture and transabdominal removal of surgical specimen during Ivor Lewis robotic esophagectomy.

In the surgical treatment of esophageal cancer, robotic surgery allows performing an intrathoracic handsewn anastomosis in a simpler, faster and more comfortable way for the surgeon than open surgery and traditional minimally invasive surgery. With this, we avoid the use of self-suture instruments, some of which require a small thoracotomy for their introduction. However, the retrieval of the specimen requires the practice of this thoracotomy, of variable size, that can be associated with intense chest pain. We describe a technical modification of the classic robotic Ivor Lewis that allows removal of the surgical piece through a minimal abdominal incision, thus avoiding controlled rib fracture, as well as the possible sequelae of making an incision in the chest wall.

Non-stapled, total laparoscopic Roux-en-Y anastomosis: A safe and effective procedure for radical pediatric choledochal cyst excision.

Background: Laparoscopic or robot-assisted surgery has become the main pediatric minimal invasive surgery for a choledochal cyst (CDC). However, the Roux-en-Y jejunal limb was created extracorporeally in most reports and intracorporeally in a few reports using an endoscopic stapler. Objectives/methods: To investigate the safety and feasibility of non-stapled laparoscopic Roux-en-Y reconstruction in the radical treatment of congenital choledochal cysts (CDC). Between January 2019 and February 2023, 40 patients diagnosed with CDC underwent non-stapled laparoscopic Roux-en-Y reconstruction (non-stapled totally laparoscopic radical treatment, NTLR), 40 patients underwent conventional reconstruction (conventional laparoscopic radical treatment, CLR) included as control. Their clinical data such as intraoperative blood loss, proportion of transit laparotomy, length of operation, postoperative fasting times, postoperative drainage time, postoperative hospital stay, hospitalization cost, and postoperative complications were retrospectively analyzed. Conclusion: non-stapled laparoscopic Roux-en-Y reconstruction is feasible and safe in total laparoscopic radical treatment of CDC. It may have the following advantages: rapid recovery of postoperative gastrointestinal function, short hospitalization, no age limit on the patient and no additional hospitalization costs, which is worthy of promotion and application.

Caecal Volvulus Presenting as an Obstructed Inguinal Hernia: A Case Report.

Caecal volvulus (CV) is an uncommon cause of large intestinal obstruction due to the axial torsion of the caecum, ascending colon, and terminal ileum. We describe the case of a 37-year-old man who presented with bilateral inguinal hernias (the left larger than the right), diffuse abdominal pain, vomiting, difficulty passing stool, and flatus that were comparable to those of an obstructed hernia. Imaging tests revealed a collapsed ascending colon, free fluid collection, and a significantly dilated proximal ileum. An urgent laparotomy showed a perforated, clockwise-twisted caecum that required a right hemicolectomy. Postoperatively, the patient had a good recovery. CV is uncommon, and its symptoms are vague, making diagnosis difficult. For an accurate diagnosis and prompt action, imaging tools and a high index of suspicion are essential. This case serves as a reminder of the significance of taking rare entities into consideration in developing a differential diagnosis of complex abdominal presentations and the necessity for a differential diagnostic approach to choose the most suitable surgical course of action.

Impact of Minimally Invasive Intrathoracic Hand-sewn Esophago-gastric Anastomosis in Esophagectomy for Cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Ivor Lewis esophagectomy is considered the gold standard approach for the treatment of distal esophageal and gastro-esophageal junction Siewert I-II tumors. Minimally invasive esophagectomy has provided improved outcomes compared to the open approach, offering reduced morbidity, and improved clinical and oncological outcomes. This is the largest study so far reporting the impact of hand-sewn esophago-gastric anastomosis in the prone position, during the 2-stage totally minimally invasive esophagectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data regarding consecutive patients with distal-esophageal and gastroesophageal junction Siewert I-II tumors was conducted. All patients underwent 2-stage totally minimally invasive esophagectomy with thoracoscopic manual esophago-gastric anastomosis in the prone position. Clinical and oncological outcomes were examined and presented. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty consecutive patients were included in the study during a period of five years. Median operative time was 320 minutes, while median time for the construction of anastomosis was 45 minutes. We had no conversions to open esophagectomy. Anastomotic leakage was observed in 2% of the patients; anastomotic stricture rate reached up to 7.33%. Respiratory complications were seen in 18% and cardiac complications in 6.66% of the patients, respectively. Thirty-day mortality and 90-day mortality rates were 1.33% and 2.66%, accordingly. CONCLUSION: Intrathoracic hand-sewn esophago-gastric anastomosis in the prone position during totally minimally invasive esophagectomy has provided favorable outcomes in our cohort of patients, offering significantly reduced anastomotic-related complications, compared to other standardized techniques. Further prospective comparative studies are needed, to better interpret and amplify our results, that may lead to a paradigm shift regarding the preferred method of reconstruction from esophageal surgeons.

Hand-sewn esophagojejunostomy in transthoracic single-port assisted laparoscopic esophagogastrectomy for Siewert type II adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction with esophageal invasion > 3 cm.

BACKGROUND: An optimal method for digestive tract reconstruction (DTR) in laparoscopic radical resection of Siewert type II adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction (AEG) has not yet been standardized. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of a hand-sewn esophagojejunostomy (EJ) technique during transthoracic single-port assisted laparoscopic esophagogastrectomy (TSLE) for Siewert type II AEG with esophageal invasion > 3 cm. METHODS: The perioperative clinical data and short-term outcomes for patients who underwent TSLE using hand-sewn EJ for Siewert type II AEG with esophageal invasion > 3 cm between March 2019 and April 2022 have been retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: A total of 25 patients were eligible. All 25 patients were successfully operated. None was converted to open surgery or mortality. 84.00% of patients were male and 16.00% were female. The mean age, body mass index (BMI), and the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score were 67.88 ± 8.10 years, 21.30 ± 2.80 kg/m2, and 2.08, respectively. The average incorporated operative and hand-sewn EJ procedural times were 274.92 ± 57.46 and 23.36 ± 3.00 min, respectively. The length of extracorporeal esophageal involvement and proximal margin was 3.31 ± 0.26 cm and 3.12 ± 0.12 cm, respectively. The average time for the first oral feeding and hospital stay were 6 (3-14) and 7 (3-18) days, respectively. Two patients (8.00%) developed postoperative grade IIIa complications according to the Clavien-Dindo classification, including 1 case of pleural effusion and 1 case of anastomotic leakage, both of whom were cured by puncture drainage. CONCLUSION: Hand-sewn EJ in TSLE is safe and feasible for Siewert type II AEG. This method can ensure safe proximal margins and could be a good option with an advanced endoscopic suture technique for type II tumor with esophageal invasion > 3 cm.

Hand-Sewn Gastrojejunostomy In Situ to Solve Acute Anastomotic Stricture Due to Submucosal Tunneling in Gastric Bypass.

Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is the second most widely used bariatric surgical procedure for morbid obesity and its related comorbidities. Anastomotic stricture is one of the major complications after RYGB. Submucosal tunneling is a rare cause of anastomotic stricture or occlusion, and clinical symptoms will appear soon after surgery. We present our technical suggestions to perform a hand-sewn gastrojejunostomy in situ when the gastric pouch is too small and the tissue is not enough to be resected to solve acute anastomotic stricture due to submucosal tunneling in gastric bypass.

Comparing intracorporeal mechanical anastomosis vs. hand-sewn esophagojejunostomy after total laparoscopic gastrectomy for esophagogastric junction cancer: a single-center study.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the effects of continuous hand-sewn esophagojejunostomy with barbed suture and mechanical anastomosis in total laparoscopic gastrectomy for esophagogastric junction cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The clinical data of 60 patients who underwent total laparoscopic total gastrectomy from January 2020 to October 2021 were collected retrospectively. Baseline data and short-term surgical results of patients in the hand-sewn anastomosis (n = 30) and mechanical anastomosis (n = 30) groups were analyzed. RESULTS: No significant differences were detected in the baseline data between groups. Meanwhile, the hand-sewn group had a shorter anastomosis time (21.2 ± 4.9 min vs. 27.9 ± 6.9 min, p < 0.001) and a decreased operation cost (CNY 70608.3 ± 8106.7 vs. CNY 76485.6 ± 3149.9, p = 0.001). The tumor margin distance in the hand-sewn group was longer than in the mechanical group (2.7 ± 0.4 cm vs. 2.2 ± 0.75 cm, p = 0.002). In esophagojejunostomy anastomosis, the distance between the jejunal opening and jejunal stump in the hand-sewn group was significantly shorter than that in the mechanical group (2.2 ± 0.54 cm vs. 5.7 ± 0.6 cm, p < 0.001). No significant difference was detected in the incidence of postoperative anastomotic complications. CONCLUSION: The continuous hand-sewn anastomosis with barbed suture in total laparoscopic gastrectomy for esophagogastric junction cancer is practical, safe, and cost-effective. It is also an effective supplementary technique for mechanical anastomosis.

Hand-Sewn Versus Stapled Small Bowel Anastomoses in Patients With Secondary Mesenteric Ischemia.

INTRODUCTION: Although stapled anastomoses have been widely evaluated in the context of the elective surgery, few reports compared manual with stapled anastomoses in patients undergoing emergency surgery. The aim of this study is to compare the outcome of hand-sewn end-to-end anastomoses with stapled side-to-side and stapled end-to-side anastomoses in patients undergoing small bowel resection for acute mesenteric ischemia secondary to intestinal obstruction. METHODS: From January 2015 to June 2021 all the hemodynamically stable patients undergoing emergency surgery with small bowel resection for intestinal obstruction were enrolled in this study. According to surgical technique in performing anastomosis, the patients were divided into three groups: group 1: hand-sewn end-to-end anastomosis, group 2: stapled end-to-side anastomosis, and group 3: stapled side-to-side anastomosis. RESULTS: Although the anastomosis failure rate was higher in group 3, it was not significantly different between the three groups (P = 0.78: chi-square test). Likewise, no significant differences in the median hospital stay were found between the patients' groups (P = 0.87: Kruskal-Wallis test). The median operating time was similar in patients undergoing stapled anastomoses and was significantly higher in patients undergoing hand-sewn anastomoses (P = 0.0009: Kruskal-Wallis test). CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing emergency small bowel resection for complicated intestinal obstruction, a similar outcome in terms of dehiscence rate and hospital stay can be achieved performing stapled or hand-sewn anastomoses, even if restoring the intestinal continuity with stapled technique is associated with lower operating time.

Hand-sewn direct repair versus resection and hand-sewn anastomosis techniques for the reversal of diverting loop ileostomy after lower anterior rectal resection surgery: A randomized clinical trial.

INTRODUCTION: Several techniques have been proposed for the closure of loop ileostomy. This is the first study comparing bowel function and outcomes of two different hand-sewn surgical techniques used for the closure of diverting protective loop ileostomy. METHOD: In this prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial, 40 patients with a history of rectal cancer, low anterior resection, and diverting loop ileostomy who were candidates for ileostomy reversal were included and randomly assigned into two groups, hand-sewn direct repair of the ileal defect (group A) and resection and hand-sewn anastomosis of the ileum (group B). RESULTS: The mean age of patients was 56.42 and 52.10 years in groups A and B, respectively. Regarding early postoperative period, group A developed earlier first gas passage (1.68 vs. 2.25 days, p = 0.041) and stool passage (2.10 vs. 2.80 days, p = 0.032). Group A also revealed shorter operating time (83.68 vs. 89.50 min, p = 0.040) and hospital stay (4.73 vs. 6.80 days, p = 0.001). None of the participants in both groups developed signs of bowel obstruction during the early and late postoperative follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: Direct hand-sewn repair for the closure of diverting loop ileostomy is a safe technique with better postoperative bowel function, oral diet tolerance, and less hospital stay compared to resection and hand-sewn anastomosis of the ileum.

Hyperspectral imaging detects perfusion and oxygenation differences between stapled and hand-sewn intestinal anastomoses.

Objectives: Hand-sewn and stapled intestinal anastomoses are both daily performed routine procedures by surgeons. Yet, differences in micro perfusion of these two surgical techniques and their impact on surgical outcomes are still insufficiently understood. Only recently, hyperspectral imaging (HSI) has been established as a non-invasive, contact-free, real-time assessment tool for tissue oxygenation and micro-perfusion. Hence, objective of this study was HSI assessment of different intestinal anastomotic techniques and analysis of patients' clinical outcome. Methods: Forty-six consecutive patients with an ileal-ileal anastomoses were included in our study; 21 side-to-side stapled and 25 end-to-end hand-sewn. Based on adsorption and reflectance of the analyzed tissue, chemical color imaging indicates oxygen saturation (StO2), tissue perfusion (near-infrared perfusion index [NIR]), organ hemoglobin index (OHI), and tissue water index (TWI). Results: StO2 as well as NIR of the region of interest (ROI) was significantly higher in stapled anastomoses as compared to hand-sewn ileal-ileal anastomoses (StO2 0.79 (0.74-0.81) vs. 0.66 (0.62-0.70); p<0.001 NIR 0.83 (0.70-0.86) vs. 0.70 (0.63-0.76); p=0.01). In both groups, neither anastomotic leakage nor abdominal septic complications nor patient death did occur. Conclusions: Intraoperative HSI assessment is able to detect significant differences in tissue oxygenation and NIR of hand-sewn and stapled intestinal anastomoses. Long-term clinical consequences resulting from the reduced tissue oxygenation and tissue perfusion in hand-sewn anastomoses need to be evaluated in larger clinical trials, as patients may benefit from further refined surgical techniques.

Esophageal magnetic compression anastomosis in dogs.

BACKGROUND: Magnetic compression anastomosis (MCA) is a novel suture-free reconstruction of the digestive tract. It has been used in gastrointestinal anastomosis, jejunal anastomosis, cholangioenteric anastomosis and so on. The traditional operative outcomes of congenital esophageal atresia and benign esophageal stricture are poor, and there are too many complications postoperatively. AIM: To test MCA technology to reconstruct the esophagus in dogs, prior to studying the feasibility and safety of MCA in humans. METHODS: Thirty-six dogs were randomized into either the study or control group (n = 18 per group). The dogs in the study group were subjected to end-to-end esophageal anastomosis with the magnetic compression device, while those in the control group underwent hand-sewn anastomosis with 4-0 absorbable multifilament Vicryl. We used interrupted single-layer inverting sutures. The anastomosis time, gross appearance, weight and pathology of the anastomosis were evaluated at one month, three months and six months postoperatively. RESULTS: The anastomosis time of the MCA group was shorter than that of the hand-sewn group (7.5 ± 1.0 min vs 12.5 ± 1.8 min, P < 0.01). In the MCA group, X-ray examination was performed every day to locate the magnetic device in the esophagus before the magnetic device fell off from the esophagus. In the hand-sewn group, dogs did not undergo X-ray examination. One month after the surgeries, the mean weight of the dogs in the hand-sewn group had decreased more than that of the dogs in the MCA group (11.63 ± 0.71 kg vs 12.73 ± 0.80 kg, P < 0.05). At 3 mo and 6 mo after the operation, the dogs' weights were similar between the two groups (13.75 ± 0.84 kg vs 14.03 ± 0.82 kg, 14.93 ± 0.80 kg vs 15.44 ± 0.47 kg). The number of inflammatory cells in MCA group was lower than that in hand-sewn group on 1 mo after operation. CONCLUSION: MCA is an effective and safe method for esophageal reconstruction. The anastomosis time of the MCA group was less than that of the hand-sewn group. This study shows that MCA technology may be applied to human esophageal reconstruction, provided these favorable results are confirmed by more publications.

Evaluating the outcomes of primary anastomosis with hand-sewn full-circular reinforcement in managing perforated left-sided colonic diverticulitis.

Background: It is a challenge to avoid stoma formation in emergency surgery of perforated left-sided diverticulum. The hand-sewn full-circular reinforcement of the colorectal anastomosis is used during complete pelvic peritonectomy to avoid a diverting ileostomy. This study examined the effect of applying the reinforcement method to perforated left-sided colonic diverticulitis with respect to the permanent stoma rate and cost-effectiveness. Materials and methods: This historical cohort study examined all patients who underwent emergency surgery for perforation of a left-sided diverticulum at the Hyogo Prefectural Amagasaki General Medical Center between July 2015 and September 2019. The cohort was divided into two groups: those who underwent conventional method (Group F) and those for whom the hand-sewn full-circular reinforcement method was actively performed (Group L). Results: The number of patients who underwent emergency surgery which did not lead to an ostomy increased significantly from 12% (3/25) in Group F to 42% (11/26) in Group L (P = 0.0015). The rate of permanent stoma decreased from 80% in Group F to 27% in Group L (P < 0.001). Total treatment costs for patients under the age of 80 in Group L were significantly lower than those in Group F (2170000 ± 1020000 vs 3270000 ± 1960000 JPY; P = 0.018). Conclusions: In emergency surgery for left-sided perforated colonic diverticulitis, applying the hand-sewn full-circle reinforcement of the anastomotic site may reduce stoma formation at the initial surgery and consequently decrease permanent stoma rate and contribute to cost-effectiveness without increasing complications such as anastomotic leakage.