The Relationship between Timing of Pretransplant Kidney Biopsy, Graft Loss, and Survival in Kidney Transplantation: An Italian Cohort Study.

INTRODUCTION: Kidney biopsy is performed to assess if an extended criteria graft can be used for transplantation. It may be performed before or after cross-clamping during organ procurement. This study aims to evaluate whether the timing of biopsy may modify cold ischemia times (CIT) and/or graft outcomes. METHODS: Kidney transplants performed in our center from January 2007 to December 2017 were analyzed. Grafts with preimplantation kidney biopsy were included. Biopsies were performed during surgical back table (ex situ kidney biopsy [ESKB]) until 2012 and since then before the aortic cross-clamping (in situ kidney biopsy [ISKB]). To overcome biases owing to different distributions, a propensity score model was developed. The study population consists in 322 patients, 115 ESKB, and 207 ISKB. RESULTS: CIT was significantly lower for ISKB (730 min ISKB vs. 840 min ESKB, p value = 0.001). In both crude (OR 0.27; 95% confidence interval, 95% CI 0.12-0.60; p value = 0.002) and adjusted analyses (OR 0.37; 95% CI 0.14-0.94; p value = 0.039), ISKB was associated with a reduced odd of graft loss when compared to ESKB. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: Performing preimplantation kidney biopsy during the recovery, prior to the aortic cross-clamping, may be a strategy to reduce CIT and improve transplant outcomes.

Risk factors for Epstein-Barr virus reactivation after renal transplantation: Results of a large, multi-centre study.

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) reactivation is a very common and potentially lethal complication of renal transplantation. However, its risk factors and effects on transplant outcome are not well known. Here, we have analysed a large, multi-centre cohort (N = 512) in which 18.4% of the patients experienced EBV reactivation during the first post-transplant year. The patients were characterized pre-transplant and two weeks post-transplant by a multi-level biomarker panel. EBV reactivation was episodic for most patients, only 12 patients showed prolonged viraemia for over four months. Pre-transplant EBV shedding and male sex were associated with significantly increased incidence of post-transplant EBV reactivation. Importantly, we also identified a significant association of post-transplant EBV with acute rejection and with decreased haemoglobin levels. No further severe complications associated with EBV, either episodic or chronic, could be detected. Our data suggest that despite relatively frequent EBV reactivation, it had no association with serious complications during the first post-transplantation year. EBV shedding prior to transplantation could be employed as biomarkers for personalized immunosuppressive therapy. In summary, our results support the employed immunosuppressive regimes as relatively safe with regard to EBV. However, long-term studies are paramount to support these conclusions.

Kidney transplantation and patients who decline SARS-CoV-2 vaccination: an ethical framework.

As SARS-CoV-2 vaccines have started to be rolled out, a key question facing transplant units has been whether listing for transplantation should be contingent on recipients having received a vaccine. We aimed to provide an ethical framework when considering potential transplant candidates who decline vaccination. We convened a working group comprising transplant professionals, lay members and patients and undertook a literature review and consensus process. This group's work was also informed by discussions in two hospital clinical ethics committees. We have reviewed arguments for and against mandating vaccination prior to listing for kidney transplantation and considered some practical difficulties which may be associated with a policy of mandated vaccination. Rather than requiring that all patients must receive the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine prior to transplant listing, we recommend considering vaccination status as one of a number of SARS-CoV-2-related risk factors in relation to transplant listing. Transplant units should engage in individualised risk-benefit discussions with patients, avoid the language of mandated treatments and strongly encourage uptake of the vaccine in all patient groups, using tailor-made educational initiatives.

A 2020 Banff Antibody-mediatedInjury Working Group examination of international practices for diagnosing antibody-mediated rejection in kidney transplantation - a cohort study.

The Banff antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) classification is vulnerable to misinterpretation, but the reasons are unclear. To better understand this vulnerability, we evaluated how ABMR is diagnosed in practice. To do this, the Banff Antibody-Mediated Injury Workgroup electronically surveyed an international cohort of nephrologists/surgeons (n = 133) and renal pathologists (n = 99). Most providers (97%) responded that they use the Banff ABMR classification at least sometimes, but DSA information is often not readily available. Only 41.1% (55/133) of nephrologists/surgeons and 19.2% (19/99) of pathologists reported that they always have DSA results when the biopsy is available. Additionally, only 19.6% (26/133) of nephrologists/surgeons responded that non-HLA antibody or molecular transcripts are obtained when ABMR histologic features are present but DSA is undetected. Several respondents agreed that histologic features concerning for ABMR in the absence of DSA and/or C4d are not well accounted for in the current classification [31.3% (31/99) pathologists and 37.6% (50/133) nephrologist/surgeons]. The Banff ABMR classification appears widely accepted, but efforts to improve the accessibility of DSA information for the multidisciplinary care team are needed. Further clarity is also needed in Banff ABMR nomenclature to account for the spectrum of ABMR and for histologic features suspicious for ABMR when DSA is absent.

Changing patterns of clinical decision making: are falling numbers of antibody incompatible transplants related to the increasing success of the UK Living Kidney Sharing Scheme? A national cohort study.

Antibody incompatibility is a barrier to living kidney transplantation; antibody incompatible transplantation (AIT) is an accepted treatment modality, albeit higher risk. This study aims to determine changes to clinical decision making and access to AIT in the UK. An electronic survey was sent to all UK renal transplant centres (n = 24), in 2014, and again in 2018. Questions focused on entry & duration in the UKLKSS for HLA and ABO-incompatible pairs, Can and provision of direct AIT transplantation within those centres. Between 2014 & 2018, the duration recommended for patients in the UKLKSS increased. In 2014, 34.8% of centres reported leaving HLA-i pairs in the UKLKSS indefinitely, or reviewing on a case by case basis, by 2018 this increased to 61%. Centres offering direct HLA-i transplantation reduced from 58% to 37%. For low titre (1:8) ABO-i recipients, 66% of centres recommended at least 9 months (3 matching runs) in the UKLKSS scheme in 2018, compared to 47% in 2014, 50% fewer units consider direct ABO-i transplantation for unsuccessful pairs with high ABO titres (>1:512). Over time, clinicians appear to be facilitating more conservative management of AIT patients, potentially limiting access to living donor transplantation.

Kidney transplantation outcomes for adult recipients of pediatric donor kidneys.

Despite a paucity of data assessing transplantation of deceased-donor pediatric donor kidneys into adult recipients, utilization of pediatric organs is declining in the UK, likely due to concerns that such organs may have inferior outcomes. However, we hypothesized that these concerns may be unfounded. As such, the aim of the study was to compare kidney transplant outcomes between adult recipients of pediatric and adult deceased-donor organs. Data were collected from the UK Transplant Registry for all adult (18+ years) deceased-donor single-kidney transplant recipients between January 2000 and January 2016. Univariable and multivariable analyses were undertaken, to compare a range of outcomes between recipients of kidneys from pediatric and adult donors. Transplants were stratified by the donor age (years) as follows: 0-16 (n = 666), 17-18 (n = 465), and 19-44 (n = 7378). Recipients of pediatric donor kidneys were observed to have improved long-term graft function, with a median creatinine at 1 year of 109 vs. 117 µmol/L for recipients of donors aged 0-16 vs. 19-44 years (P < .001). However, on multivariable analysis, this was not found to correspond to a significant difference in patient (P = .914) or graft survival (P = .190) between the donor age groups. Subgroup analysis within the younger donors found no significant differences in recipient outcomes between donors aged 0-6, 7-12, and 13-16 years. In this population cohort study, we identified excellent outcomes among adult recipients of pediatric donor kidneys. Pediatric donors are a valuable source of organs for adult recipients in an era where organ demand is rising.

Impact of belatacept conversion on kidney transplant function, histology, and gene expression - a single-center study.

Prior studies on belatacept conversion from calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) have been limited by an absence of postconversion surveillance biopsies that could underestimate subclinical rejection, or a case-controlled design. A total of 53 adult patients with allograft dysfunction underwent belatacept conversion (median: 6 months) post-transplant. At a median follow-up = 2.5 years, patient survival was 94% with a death-censored graft survival of 85%. Seven (13%) patients had acute rejection (including 3 subclinical) at median 6 months postconversion. Overall, eGFR improved (P = <0.001) from baseline = 31±15 to 40.2 ± 17.6 ml/min/1.73m2 by 6 months postconversion, but then stayed stable. This improvement was also observed (P < 0.001) in comparison with a propensity matched control cohort on CNI, where eGFR stayed stable (mean ~ 32ml/min/1.72m2 ) over 2-year follow-up. Patients converted < 6 months post-transplant were more likely to have a long-term improvement in kidney function. Paired gene expression analysis of 30 (of 53) consecutive pre- and postconversion surveillance biopsies did not reveal changes in inflammation/acute injury; although atrophy-fibrosis score worsened (mean = 0.28 to 0.44; P = 0.005). Thus, improvement in renal function with belatacept conversion occurred early and then sustained in comparison with controls where renal function remained unchanged overtime. We were unable to show molecular signals that could be related to CNI administration and regressed after withdrawal.

Association of age with risk of first and subsequent allograft failure and mortality among young kidney transplant recipients in the USA - a retrospective cohort study.

Adolescent age may be a high-risk period for kidney allograft failure. However, the knowledge on this topic is limited mostly to the first transplant. Among 20 960 patients aged ≤21 years at the first kidney transplantation from the US Renal Data System, we evaluated the association of age at the first kidney transplant with risk for the first and subsequent graft failures (1st, 2nd, and 3rd) using the conditional risk set model for recurrent time-to-event data. The median age was 15 (interquartile range: 9-18) years, and 18% received transplants twice or more during a median follow-up of 9.7 years. The risk for graft failures was highest in 16 to <18 years old with an adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) of 1.93 (95% CI, 1.73-2.15; reference: <3 years). When separately analyzed, the highest risk was observed in 17, 19, and 21 years old for the first, second, and third transplant, respectively. Those 16 to <18 years were also strongly associated with the highest risk for death after returning to dialysis (aHR, 4.01; 95% CI, 2.82-5.71). Adolescent recipients remain at high risk for allograft failure for a long time, which may result in high mortality risk, even though they surpass this high-risk period soon after the first transplant.

Crossing borders to facilitate live donor kidney transplantation: the Czech-Austrian kidney paired donation program - a retrospective study.

Kidney paired donation (KPD) is a valuable tool to overcome immunological barriers in living donor transplantation. While small national registries encounter difficulties in finding compatible matches, multi-national KPD may be a useful strategy to facilitate transplantation. The Czech (Prague) and Austrian (Vienna) KPD programs, both initiated in 2011, were merged in 2015. A bi-national algorithm allowed for ABO- and low-level HLA antibody-incompatible exchanges, including the option of altruistic donor-initiated domino chains. Between 2011 and 2019, 222 recipients and their incompatible donors were registered. Of those, 95.7% (Prague) and 67.9% (Vienna) entered into KPD registries, and 81 patients received a transplant (95% 3-year graft survival). Inclusion of ABO-incompatible pairs in the Czech program contributed to higher KPD transplant rates (42.6% vs. 23.6% in Austria). After 2015 (11 bi-national match runs), the median pool size increased to 18 pairs, yielding 33 transplants (8 via cross-border exchanges). While matching rates doubled in Austria (from 9.1% to 18.8%), rates decreased in the Czech program, partly due to implementation of more stringent HLA antibody thresholds. Our results demonstrate the feasibility of merging small national KPD programs to increase pool sizes and may encourage the implementation of multi-national registries to expand the full potential of KPD.

Relevance of KDPI value and acute rejection on kidney transplant outcomes in recipients with delayed graft function - a retrospective study.

Delayed graft function (DGF) is associated with poorer graft survival and higher rate of acute rejection (AR). It is unknown whether this negative influence relies on the increased risk of AR or the DGF itself. The different Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI) values may also play a role in this interaction. Retrospective study aimed to evaluate the impact of DGF on graft function and graft survival in a subset of KT recipients (2004-2017). We also analyzed the relationship between KDPI and DGF. The study includes 601 KT, 226 of them (37%) developed DGF. Graft survival was lower in patients with DGF compared with non-DGF patients. Multivariable analysis revealed DGF as risk factor for graft loss, independently of the presence or not of acute rejection. Between DGF patients, we observed poorer graft survival in patients with higher KDPI value (>85%). We observed a trend of a greater impact of KDPI in patients with DGF, although this interaction was not statistically significant. Additionally, we observed poorer 12-month graft function in DGF patients. DGF is related to poorer graft survival independently of the developed acute rejection. This negative impact might be influenced by high KDPI values.

Should kidney allografts from old donors be allocated only to old recipients?

In several deceased donor kidney allocation systems, organs from elderly donors are allocated primarily to elderly recipients. The Eurotransplant Senior Program (ESP) was implemented in 1999, and since then, especially in Europe, the use of organs from elderly donors has steadily increased. The proportion of ≥60-year-old donors reported to the Collaborative Transplant Study (CTS) by European centers has doubled, from 21% in 2000-2001 to 42% in 2016-2017. Therefore, in the era of organ shortage it is a matter of debate whether kidney organs from elderly donors should only be allocated to elderly recipients or whether <65-year-old recipients can also benefit from these generally as "marginal" categorized organs. To discuss this issue, a European Consensus Meeting was organized by the CTS on April 12, 2018, in Heidelberg, in which 36 experts participated. Based on available evidence, it was unanimously concluded that kidney organs from 65- to 74-year-old donors can also be allocated to 55- to 64-year-old recipients, especially if these organs are from donors with no history of hypertension, no increased creatinine, no cerebrovascular death, and no other reasons for defining a marginal donor, such as diabetes or cancer.

Outcomes of induction antibody therapies in the nonbroadly sensitized adult deceased donor kidney transplant recipients: a retrospective cohort registry analysis.

The outcomes of lymphocyte-depleting antibody induction therapy (LDAIT), [thymoglobulin (ATG) or alemtuzumab (ALM)] versus interleukin-2 receptor antagonist (IL-2RA) in the nonbroadly-sensitized [pretransplant calculated panel reactive antibody (cPRA), <80%] adult deceased donor kidney transplant recipients (adult-DDKTRs) are understudied. In this registry, study of 55 593 adult-DD-KTRs, outcomes of LDAIT [(ATG, N = 32 985) and (ALM, N = 9429)], and IL-2RA (N = 13 179) in <10% and 10-79% cPRA groups was analyzed. Adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of one-year biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) was lower; while, aOR of 1-year composite of re-hospitalization, graft loss, or death was higher with LDAIT than IL2-RA in both cPRA groups. Adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of delayed graft function was higher with LDAIT than IL-2RA in the <10% cPRA group. Adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) of 5-year death-censored graft loss (DCGL) in both <80% cPRA groups seemed higher with ALM than other inductions [(<10% cPRA: ALM versus IL2RA, aHR = 1.11, 95% CI = 1.00-1.23 and ATG versus ALM: aHR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.77-0.91; 10-79% cPRA: ALM versus IL2RA, aHR = 1.29, 95% CI = 1.02-1.64; and ATG versus ALM, aHR = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.70-0.98)]. Five-year aHR of death did not differ among induction therapies in both cPRA groups. In nonbroadly sensitized adult-DDKTRs, LDAIT is more protective against 1-year BPAR (not 5-year mortality) than IL-2RA; the trend of a higher 5-year DCGL risk with ALM than ATG or IL-2RA needs further investigation.

Kidney graft survival of >25 years: a single center report including associated graft biopsy results.

Only few centers have reported their observations on patients with very long-term kidney graft survival of more than 25 years. Eighty-six subjects were identified in our center with graft survival of >25 years. Donor age was 31.3 ± 18.5 years. Mean duration of transplantation was 30.3 ± 3.6 years. At last follow-up, the cystatin C clearance was 47 ± 23 ml/min. Transplant biopsies for cause were performed in 30 subjects at a median of 28.4 years (19.1-40.3) after transplantation. Acute or chronic active T cell-mediated rejection was present in five cases and histological characteristics of acute or chronic active humoral rejection in eight cases. More than 80% of biopsies had inflammatory infiltrates in nonatrophic or atrophic cortical areas. The number of HLA mismatches were higher in biopsied subjects (3.0 ± 1.8 vs. 2.2 ± 1.7 without biopsy). Immunosuppressive therapy was adapted in most biopsied subjects; impaired graft function and proteinuria was unchanged at last follow-up. Sixty percent of all subjects had hyperparathyroidism (iPTH of the whole group: 132 ± 157 pg/ml), which was predominantly secondary, as judged by serum calcium and graft function. Young donor age was certainly a prerequisite of longterm graft survival. Nonetheless, inflammation or rejection in most biopsied patients suggests an important role of alloreactivity even in this late course.

Young donors with severe acute kidney injury offer an opportunity to expand the donor pool.

BACKGROUND: This study assessed our experience transplanting kidneys from young donors with severe acute kidney injury. METHODS: We performed a single center retrospective analysis of 315 kidney transplants between 1/1/2014-12/31/2016. Donor kidneys were classified according to the Acute Kidney Injury Network (AKIN) criteria. A case-matched cohort was created using recipient age, history of diabetes, donor specific antibody, donor age and donor after cardiac death. Primary endpoints were graft function measured by eGFR at 90 days and at 1-year. RESULTS: Stage 3 AKIN recipients had significantly greater eGFR at one year (63.9 ml/min v. 51.2 ml/min, p < 0.001) compared to those with Stage 0 AKIN. This difference was abrogated when compared to a case matched cohort (eGFR at 90 days or 1 year; p > 0.05). Donor and recipient characteristics on eGFR at 1 year were analyzed using linear and logistic regression. Only donor age had a significant impact on recipient eGFR. CONCLUSIONS: Donor kidneys with severe acute injury can achieve optimal 1-year outcomes. Donor age is the most significant predictor of eGFR >45 ml/min after transplant.

Bariatric surgery prior to living donor nephrectomy: a solution to expand the living donor kidney pool - a retrospective study.

Most transplant centers decline morbidly obese people for living kidney donation. Their inclusion in the living donor pool after weight loss and reversal of comorbidities by bariatric surgery could reverse the downward living donation trend. We investigated whether bariatric surgery in the morbidly obese altered their candidacy for donation, complicated their subsequent donor nephrectomy, and impacted their early postoperative outcomes in a series of 22 donors who had bariatric surgery 0.7-22 years prior to laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy. Eighteen would have been excluded from donation prior to bariatric surgery based on a body mass index (BMI) > 40. Seventeen reached a BMI < 35 after bariatric surgery. One had hypertension that resolved after bariatric surgery. Prior bariatric surgery did not influence port placement and laterality of donor nephrectomy. None required open conversion or blood transfusion. In an exploratory comparison with 37 donors with a BMI 35-40, length of stay and warm ischemic time were shorter, blood loss and postoperative complications were similar, and operative time was longer. We therefore advocate the consideration of bariatric surgery in preparation for donation in morbidly obese people since it positively alters their candidacy without major impact on the subsequent living donor nephrectomy and early outcomes.

Factors at de novo donor-specific antibody initial detection associated with allograft loss: a multicenter study.

We aimed to evaluate patient factors including nonadherence and viral infection and de novo donor-specific antibody (dnDSA) characteristics [total immunoglobulin G (IgG), C1q, IgG3, and IgG4] as predictors of renal allograft failure in a multicenter cohort with dnDSA. We performed a retrospective observational study of 113 kidney transplant recipients with dnDSA and stored sera for analysis. Predictors of death-censored allograft loss were assessed by Cox proportional modeling. Death-censored allograft survival was 77.0% (87/113) during a median follow-up of 2.2 (IQR 1.2-3.7) years after dnDSA detection. Predictors of allograft failure included medication nonadherence [HR 6.5 (95% CI 2.6-15.9)], prior viral infection requiring immunosuppression reduction [HR 5.3 (95% CI 2.1-13.5)], IgG3 positivity [HR 3.8 (95% CI 1.5, 9.3)], and time post-transplant (years) until donor-specific antibody (DSA) detection [HR 1.2 (95% CI 1.0, 1.3)]. In the 67 patients who were biopsied at dnDSA detection, chronic antibody-mediated rejection [HR 11.4 (95% CI 2.3, 56.0)] and mixed rejection [HR 7.4 (95% CI 2.2, 24.8)] were associated with allograft failure. We conclude that patient factors, including a history of viral infection requiring immunosuppression reduction or medication nonadherence, combined with DSA and histologic parameters must be considered to understand the risk of allograft failure in patients with dnDSA.

Microvascular inflammation in renal allograft biopsies assessed by endothelial and leukocyte co-immunostain: a retrospective study on reproducibility and clinical/prognostic correlates.

The most prominent histologic lesion in antibody-mediated rejection is microvascular inflammation (MVI); however, its recognition and scoring can be challenging and poorly reproducible between pathologists. We developed a dual immunohistochemical (IHC)-stain (anti-CD34/anti-CD45 for endothelium/leukocytes) as ancillary tool to improve on the semi-quantitative Banff scores and allow quantification of MVI. We examined the relationship between CD34-CD45 IHC-based quantitative MVI score (the inflamed peritubular capillary ratio, iptcr) and renal-graft failure or donor-specific antibodies (DSA) strength at the time of biopsy. Quantitative iptcr score was significantly associated with renal graft failure (hazard ratio 1.81, per 1 SD-unit [0.13 points] of iptcr-increase; P = 0.026) and predicted the presence and strength of DSA (ordinal odds ratio: 2.42; P = 0.005; 75 biopsies/60 kidney transplant recipients; 30 HLA- and/or ABO-incompatible). Next, we assessed inter-pathologist agreement for ptc score and ptc extent (focal/diffuse) using CD34-CD45 IHC as compared to conventional stain. Compared to conventional stain, CD34-CD45 IHC significantly increased inter-pathologist agreement on ptc score severity and extent (κ-coefficient from 0.52-0.80 and 0.46-0.68, respectively, P < 0.001). Our findings show that CD34-CD45 IHC improves reproducibility of MVI scoring and facilitates MVI quantification and introduction of a dual anti-CD34/CD45 has the potential to improve recognition of MVI ahead of DSA results.

A method to reduce variability in scoring antibody-mediated rejection in renal allografts: implications for clinical trials - a retrospective study.

Poor reproducibility in scoring antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) using the Banff criteria might limit the use of histology in clinical trials. We evaluated the reproducibility of Banff scoring of 67 biopsies by six renal pathologists at three institutions. Agreement by any two pathologists was poor: 44.8-65.7% for glomerulitis, 44.8-67.2% for peritubular capillaritis, and 53.7-80.6% for chronic glomerulopathy (cg). All pathologists agreed on cg0 (n = 20) and cg3 (n = 9) cases, however, many disagreed on scores of cg1 or cg2. The range for the incidence of composite diagnoses by individual pathologists was: 16.4-22.4% for no ABMR; 17.9-47.8% for active ABMR; and 35.8-59.7% for chronic, active antibody-mediated rejection (cABMR). A "majority rules" approach was then tested in which the scores of three pathologists were used to reach an agreement. This increased consensus both for individual scores (ex. 67.2-77.6% for cg) and for composite diagnoses (ex. 74.6-86.6% cABMR). Modeling using these results showed that differences in individual scoring could affect the outcome assessment in a mock study of cABMR. We conclude that the Banff schema has high variability and a majority rules approach could be used to adjudicate differences between pathologists and reduce variability in scoring in clinical trials.

The impact of donor body mass index on outcomes after deceased kidney transplantation - a national population-cohort study.

The aim of this study was to determine the effect of donor body mass index (BMI) on deceased donor kidney transplant outcomes. Data were collected from the UK Transplant Registry for all deceased donor kidney transplant recipients between January 2003 and January 2015. Univariable and multivariable analyses were undertaken to assess the impact of donor BMI on a range of outcomes. Donor BMI (kg/m2 ) was stratified as <18.5 (n = 380), 18.5-25.0 (n = 6890), 25.1-30.0 (n = 6669), 30.1-35.0 (n = 2503) and >35.0 (n = 1148). The prevalence of delayed graft function increased significantly with donor BMI (P < 0.001), with an adjusted odds ratio of 1.38 (95% CI: 1.16-1.63) for the >35.0 vs. 18.5-25.0 groups. However, there was no significant association between donor BMI and 12-month creatinine (P = 0.550), or patient (P = 0.109) or graft (P = 0.590) survival. In overweight patients, increasing donor BMI was associated with a significant increase in warm ischaemia time and functional warm ischaemia time, by an average of 4.6% (P = 0.043) and 5.2% (P = 0.013) per 10.0 kg/m2 . However, rising warm ischaemic time and functional warm ischaemic time was not significantly associated with delayed graft function, 12-month creatinine levels, graft loss or patient death. In this population cohort study, we identified no significant association between donor BMI and long-term clinical outcomes in deceased donor kidney transplantation.