Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Toxins (Basel) ; 15(1)2023 01 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36668895

ABSTRACT

(1) Background: OnabotulinumtoxinA (BoNT-A) is a commonly used prophylactic treatment for chronic migraine (CM). Although randomized placebo studies have shown its clinical efficacy, the mechanisms by which it exerts its therapeutic effect are still incompletely understood and debated. (2) Methods: We studied in 15 CM patients the cephalic and extracephalic nociceptive and lemniscal sensory systems using electrophysiological techniques before and 1 and 3 months after one session of pericranial BoNT-A injections according to the PREEMPT protocol. We recorded the nociceptive blink reflex (nBR), the trigemino-cervical reflex (nTCR), the pain-related cortical evoked potential (PREP), and the upper limb somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP). (3) Results: Three months after a single session of prophylactic therapy with BoNT-A in CM patients, we found (a) an increase in the homolateral and contralateral nBR AUC, (b) an enhancement of the contralateral nBR AUC habituation slope and the nTCR habituation slope, (c) a decrease in PREP N-P 1st and 2nd amplitude block, and (d) no effect on SSEPs. (4) Conclusions: Our study provides electrophysiological evidence for the ability of a single session of BoNT-A injections to exert a neuromodulatory effect at the level of trigeminal system through a reduction in input from meningeal and other trigeminovascular nociceptors. Moreover, by reducing activity in cortical pain processing areas, BoNT-A restores normal functioning of the descending pain modulation systems.


Subject(s)
Botulinum Toxins, Type A , Migraine Disorders , Humans , Botulinum Toxins, Type A/therapeutic use , Botulinum Toxins, Type A/pharmacology , Nociception , Pain , Migraine Disorders/drug therapy , Sense Organs
2.
Neurocase ; 24(1): 7-9, 2018 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29310506

ABSTRACT

Agreeing with Damasio's statement defining the "process" of consciousness, we propose the self as created by mind-based knowledge and a combination of images of an organism's intentional motor responses interacting with its environment. The lemniscal system, with plastic capabilities, manages gravity in voluntary movement. The spinal segment motor reflex represents the schema of gravity-managing neuronal activity, and it can become "nested" in cortical areas participating in consciousness-building, allowing consideration of the brain as a hyper-evolved nervous system segment harboring atavic spinal organization. Consciousness' capability to change itself makes humans co-participants in their own mental and consciousness evolution.


Subject(s)
Brain/cytology , Consciousness/physiology , Internship and Residency , Neurons/physiology , Neurosurgery , Brain/physiology , Humans
3.
Neuromodulation ; 19(8): 882-884, 2016 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26762589

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although the number of patients with chronic neuropathic pain treated by spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is continuously increasing, its analgesic mechanism remains to be elucidated. Previous studies have demonstrated that classical SCS (low stimulation frequency evoking paresthesia) inhibits the somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs). CASE PRESENTATION: We describe here the results of a series of SEPs recordings performed in a female patient with chronic pain, using four different types of SCS: the classical SCS (60 Hz, 250 µsec) and three paresthesia free SCS modalities: high frequency (10 kHz, 20 µsec) and two types of high-density SCS (500 Hz, 500 µsec and 200 Hz, 1000 µsec). All the tested SCS modalities completely inhibited the SEPs cortical responses, with an immediate recovery of the inhibition after turning the stimulator off. CONCLUSIONS: All the tested SCS modalities are able to inhibit SEPs and thus the lemniscal system. In particular, both paresthesia and paresthesia free SCS affect SEPs in the same manner. The presence of this inhibitory effect during paresthesia free modalities suggests that it is independent from the generation of action potentials, with a probable mechanism acting at the stimulation site. Further studies investigating the relationship between the inhibition of the lemniscal system and the analgesic effect of the SCS are, therefore, warranted.


Subject(s)
Evoked Potentials, Somatosensory/physiology , Neural Inhibition/physiology , Neuralgia/therapy , Spinal Cord Stimulation/methods , Adult , Cerebral Cortex/physiopathology , Electroencephalography , Female , Humans
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL