[Novel therapies for MDS and future prospects].

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are clonal diseases resulting from the accumulation of genetic mutations. In general, MDS is categorized into two risk groups, with management and treatment varying significantly based on this classification. Over the past two decades, allogeneic transplantation and hypomethylating agents (HMAs) have become the standard of care and remain crucial for higher-risk MDS. Unfortunately, no new drugs have emerged to replace HMAs as the standard of care. However, the landscape of practice and research in MDS has evolved. In 2022, the focus of diagnostic classification of MDS shifted significantly from morphology to genetic alterations. As a result, treatment strategies centered on genetic mutations are now already used internationally. Revisions made to the International Working Group (IWG) criteria for assessing treatment response in 2023 are expected to further improve accuracy. Meanwhile, interest has increased in understanding the relationship between inflammation and the development and progression of lower-risk MDS. This year, luspatercept, an anti-anemic agent targeting the TGFß pathway, became available for clinical use in Japan. Various research initiatives are currently underway to develop new medicines targeting specific molecules within innate immune and inflammasome-signaling pathways, including IL-1ß, CD33, TLR, IRAK4, and p38MAPK.

Targeted therapies for myelodysplastic Syndromes/Neoplasms (MDS): current landscape and future directions.

INTRODUCTION: Myelodysplastic syndromes/neoplasms (MDS) are a heterogeneous group of hematologic malignancies that are stratified into high-risk (HR-MDS) and low-risk (LR-MDS) categories. Until recently LR-MDS has been typically managed by supportive measures and erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs); whereas, management of HR-MDS, typically included hypomethylating agents and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant. However, the limited rates and duration of response observed with these interventions prompted the search for targeted therapies to improve the outcomes among patients with MDS. AREAS COVERED: Here we review the current landscape of targeted therapies in MDS. These include pyruvate kinase and hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) activators; TGF-beta, telomerase, BCL2 and isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) inhibitors; as well as novel approaches targeting inflammation, pyroptosis, immune evasion and RNA splicing machinery. EXPERT OPINION: This review highlights the progress and challenges in MDS treatment. Despite some promising results, many therapies remain in early development or have faced setbacks, emphasizing the need for a more comprehensive understanding of the disease's pathobiology. Continued research into targeted therapies, homogenous clinical trial designs, as well as increased incorporation of molecular prognostic tools and artificial intelligence into trial design are essential for developing effective treatments for MDS and improving patient outcomes.

Luspatercept enhances hemoglobin levels in a Chinese boy with congenital sideroblastic anemia: A case report.

BACKGROUND: Congenital sideroblastic anemia (CSA) is a rare and heterogeneous group of genetic disorders. Conventional treatment include pyridoxine (vitamin B6) and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT), and can alleviate anemia in the majority of cases. Nevertheless, some CSA cases remain unresponsive to pyridoxine or are unable to undergo allo-HSCT. Novel management approaches is necessary to be developed. To explore the response of luspatercept in treating congenital sideroblastic anemia. CASE SUMMARY: We share our experience in luspatercept in a 4-year-old male patient with CSA. Luspatercept was administered subcutaneously at doses of 1.0 mg/kg/dose to 1.25 mg/kg/dose every 3 wk, three consecutive doses, evaluating the hematological response. Luspatercept leading to a significant improvement in the patient's anemia. The median hemoglobin during the overall treatment with three doses of luspatercept was 90 (75-101) g/L, the median absolute reticulocyte count was 0.0593 (0.0277-0.1030) × 1012/L, the median serum ferritin was 304.3 (234.4-399) ng/mL, and the median lifespan of mature red blood cells was 80 (57-92) days. Notably, no adverse reactions, such as headaches, dizziness, vomiting, joint pain, or back pain, were observed during the treatment period. CONCLUSION: We believe that luspatercept might emerge as a viable therapeutic option for the maintenance treatment of CSA or as a bridging treatment option before hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Rapid and sustained response to luspatercept and eltrombopag combined treatment in one case of clonal cytopenias of undetermined significance with prior failure to cyclosporin and androgen therapy: a case report.

Clonal cytopenia of undetermined significance (CCUS) has the characteristics of high-risk transformation into myelodysplastic syndromes. At present, there are few effective treatments for CCUS, and there is no consensus or evidence-based recommendation. We present a case demonstrating a rapid, significant and sustained response to combined treatment with luspatercept and eltrombopag, following the failure of cyclosporin and androgen therapy. Even after discontinuing luspatercept for 10 months, trilineage haematopoiesis remained normal with the use of cyclosporin and other haematopoietic stimulants. This case suggests that the inhibition of transforming growth factor-ß could potentially have an immunomodulatory effect, thereby promoting the recovery of haematopoietic function. Luspatercept, along with Acalabrutinib or Cyclosporine, may synergistically stimulate haematopoiesis.

Treatment of myelofibrosis with refractory anemia with luspatercept: a multicenter Chinese study.

Myelofibrosis is a rare and often fatal hematological neoplasm, and the treatment of myelofibrosis-associated anemia remains suboptimal, with no improved therapies. Luspatercept was shown to display some efficacy in a phase 2 clinical trial for Myelofibrosis with anemia, yet relevant research are limited. Threrfore, data from patients diagnosed with refractory anemic primary or post-essential thrombocythemia/polycythemia vera myelofibrosis, who were treated with luspatercept for at least 9 weeks, were retrospectively collected. Eighteen patients with myelofibrosis treated with luspatercept were enrolled. Median age was 68 years (range, 44-80 years), and 27.8% were males. Ten (55.6%) were transfusion-dependent. Ten (55.6%) were Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System intermediate-1, and eight (44.4%) were intermediate-2. The median follow-up was 7 (4-16) months. Erythroid response occurred in eight patients (44.4%) at week 12, four patients (30.8%) at week 24, and nine (50%) at the end of follow-up. Patients who were transfusion-dependent and not transfusion-dependent had similar HI-E responses, at different time points (P > 0.05). Patients had a significantly higher hemoglobin level at 12 weeks, 24 weeks, and at the end of follow-up, than at baseline (P = 0.001, P = 0.021, and P = 0.005, respectively). Treatment-related adverse events occurred in five (16.7%) patients, with no serious adverse events. Two (11.1%) patients relapsed at weeks 15 and 31. One patient progressed to acute myeloid leukemia. No patients had died by the end of follow-up. Luspatercept induced a good response in patients with anemic myelofibrosis, with a low relapse rate and good tolerance.

Luspatercept's use in a patient with transfusion-dependent beta-thalassemia and intrathoracic extramedullary hematopoiesis (EMH).

Key Clinical Message: This case report and literature review examine the use of a relatively novel agent in a transfusion-dependent beta-thalassemia patient with extramedullary hematopoiesis (EMH). It examines the benefits and risks associated with its use and reviews the available literature while highlighting the drug's results in our patient with a higher risk profile. Abstract: Beta thalassemia can be complicated by EMH, which causes different symptoms based on location and size. Luspatercept is a new agent approved for transfusion-dependent thalassemia and Non-transfusion-dependent thalassemia (NTDT). Still, its use in patients with EMH was not well studied, and literature showed an increased risk of EMH expansion or development of new masses after its use. We discuss, in this case, the results of luspatercept treatment in a patient with transfusion-dependent thalassemia who is considered high risk for its use due to the patient's specific characteristics (history of symptomatic intrathoracic EMH, previous splenectomy, refusal to use antithrombotic medications). While also highlighting the benefits of using luspatercept regarding decreasing the iron overload and improving hemoglobin levels and examining how it was used safely to manage a transfusion-dependent thalassemia patient with an extramedullary hematopoiesis mass with no adverse events of note.

Latest Insights and Therapeutic Advances in Myelodysplastic Neoplasms.

Myelodysplastic syndromes/neoplasms (MDSs) encompass a range of hematopoietic malignancies, commonly affecting elderly individuals. Molecular alterations in the hematopoietic stem cell compartment drive disease pathogenesis. Recent advancements in genomic profiling have provided valuable insights into the biological underpinnings of MDSs and have expanded therapeutic options, particularly for specific molecularly defined subgroups. This review highlights the diagnostic principles, classification updates, prognostic stratification systems, and novel treatments, which could inform future clinical trials and enhance the management of adult MDS patients, particularly for specific molecularly defined subgroups.

Luspatercept in low-risk myelodysplastic syndromes: a paradigm shift in treatment strategies.

INTRODUCTION: In patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), anemia is prevalent affecting 80%-85% of low-risk (LR-MDS) patients, with 40% eventually requiring red blood cell (RBC) transfusions. Except forlenalidomide, exclusively approved for those with deletion of chromosome 5q,erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) are the primary treatment choice for low-risk patients. Those unresponsive to ESAs face limited alternatives, eventually necessitating long-term RBC transfusions, leading to secondary iron overload and adversely affecting quality of life (QoL). AREA COVERED: Luspatercept is a pioneering erythroid maturation agent. It received approval by both the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for treating adults experiencing transfusion-dependent anemia associated with LR-MDS or ß-thalassemia. Recently, the FDA approved luspatercept as first- line therapy in patients with very low- to intermediate-risk MDS who require RBC transfusions and have not previously received ESAs. This review summarizes the historical impact of luspatercept intreating LR-MDS unresponsive to ESAs and illustrates its potential benefit asfrontline therapy in MDS and its employment in patients with myelofibrosis-induced anemia. EXPERT OPINION: Luspatercept has revolutionized the therapeutic paradigm of LR-MDS, for which there was a limited therapeutic arsenal, especially in the setting of patients who did not respond or fail after ESA treatment.

Luspatercept for the treatment of congenital sideroblastic anemia: Two case reports.

Congenital sideroblastic anemia (CSA) is a group of disorders caused by different genetic mutations that result in low iron utilization and ineffective erythropoiesis. Current treatments are limited, and some patients do not respond to vitamin B6 therapy. Luspatercept is a novel erythropoietic maturation agent approved for adult ß-thalassemia and Myelodysplastic syndromes with ring sideroblasts (MDS-RS) associated with ineffective erythropoiesis. Here we report 2 patients with CSA due to mutations in ALAS2 and SLC25A38 genes who became unresponsive after a period of treatment with vitamin B6 and iron chelators but achieved transfusion independence and a markedly reduced spleen after combination with luspatercept.

Phase to phase: Navigating drug combinations with hypomethylating agents in higher-risk MDS trials for optimal outcomes.

Recent developments in high-risk Myelodysplastic Neoplasms (HR MDS) treatment are confronted with challenges in study design due to evolving drug combinations with Hypomethylating Agents (HMAs). The shift from the International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) to its molecular revision (IPSS-M) has notably influenced research and clinical practice. Introducing concepts like the MDS/AML overlap complicate classifications and including chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) in MDS studies introduces another layer of complexity. The International Consortium for MDS emphasizes aligning HR MDS criteria with the 2022 ELN criteria for AML. Differences in advancements between AML and MDS treatments and hematological toxicity in HR MDS underline the importance of detailed trial designs. Effective therapeutic strategies require accurate reporting of adverse events, highlighting the need for clarity in criteria like the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). We provide an overview on negative clinical trials in HR MDS, analyze possible reasons and explore possibilities to optimize future clinical trials in this challenging patient population.

Health-related quality of life with standard and curative therapies in thalassemia: A narrative literature review.

Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) is a patient-reported outcome that assesses the impact of a disease or illness on different domains of a patient's life. Different general and disease-specific measures can be used to evaluate HRQOL. This article aimed to summarize the evidence for HRQOL among patients with transfusion-dependent (TDT) and non-transfusion-dependent thalassemia (NTDT). We included HRQOL data related to standard therapy with blood transfusions, iron chelation, and/or luspatercept in TDT and NTDT, as well as curative therapies for TDT, including hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) and gene therapy. Patients with thalassemia had worse HRQOL scores compared to the general population, and chronic pain was seen to increase in frequency and severity over time with age. NTDT patients reported worse physical health and functioning, mental health, general health, and vitality than TDT patients. However, TDT patients reported worse pain, change in health, and social support than NTDT. Most therapies improved overall HRQOL among thalassemia patients. Deferasirox, an oral iron chelator, was associated with more HRQOL benefits compared to deferoxamine, an intravenous iron chelator. Luspatercept showed clinically meaningful improvement in physical functioning among TDT and NTDT. Furthermore, HSCT and gene therapy were associated with better physical, emotional, and mental domains scores.

Treatment of anemia in myelofibrosis: focusing on novel therapeutic options.

INTRODUCTION: Myelofibrosis is a clonal myeloproliferative neoplasm associated with the proliferation of hematopoietic stem cells, increased bone marrow fibrosis, extramedullary hematopoiesis, hepatosplenomegaly, abnormal cytokine production, and constitutional symptoms. These and many other factors contribute to the development of anemia in myelofibrosis patients. AREAS COVERED: This review summarizes novel and promising treatments for anemia in myelofibrosis including transforming growth factor-ß inhibitors luspatercept and KER-050, JAK inhibitors momelotinib, pacritinib, and jaktinib, BET inhibitors pelabresib and ABBV-744, antifibrotic PRM-151, BCL2/BCL-XL inhibitor navitoclax, and telomerase inhibitor imetelstat. EXPERT OPINION: Standard approaches to treat myelofibrosis-related anemia have limited efficacy and are associated with toxicity. New drugs have shown positive results in myelofibrosis-associated anemia when used alone or in combination.

Real world practices of luspatercept at an academic medical center.

Introduction: Luspatercept is approved for patients with very low-to intermediate-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Dosing is based on pre-dose hemoglobin levels and transfusion requirements. This study aims to evaluate if a site with a pharmacist prospectively reviewing luspatercept doses achieves dose optimization, compared to a site that does not have a pharmacist prospectively reviewing doses. Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review involving patients age ≥18 years or older with MDS at a major academic medical center main campus, which does not have a pharmacist prospectively review luspatercept doses, and a satellite campus infusion center, which has a pharmacist prospectively reviewing doses. Patients included received at least one dose of luspatercept between January 1, 2017 through August 31, 2022. The primary endpoint is the percentage of off-label luspatercept doses not consistent with prescribing information (PI) recommended dose adjustments. Results: The study included 17 patients. Of the 162 doses evaluated, 37 (23%) were off-label. Off-label dosing at the main campus was more common than at a satellite location (29.6% vs. 2.4%; p < 0.003). More patients achieved transfusion independence at the satellite compared to the main campus (83.3% vs. 27.3% p < 0.39). Conclusions: There was a higher percentage of off-label dosing at a center without a pharmacist's prospective review vs. a center with a pharmacist's prospective review. On-label dose optimization may lead to a higher percentage of patients achieving transfusion independence. Enhancements in the current ordering and review process can be improved with the involvement of a pharmacist's prospective involvement at both centers.

Treatment of refractory or relapsed myelodysplastic neoplasms with luspatercept: a multicenter Chinese study.

Few effective therapies are available to treat patients with relapsed/refractory myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDS). Luspatercept was shown to display good efficacy in a phase 3 clinical trial for lower-risk MDS (LR-MDS) patients, yet real-world data are limited, especially in China. Therefore, data from patients diagnosed as having MDS with low blasts and SF3B1 mutation (MDS-SF3B1) and MDS with SF3B1 mutation and thrombocytosis were retrospectively analyzed. Of the 23 enrolled patients, 17 (73.9%) were males (median age 67 years: range 29 to 80 years). Previously, a total of 22 (95.7%) patients had received recombinant human erythropoietin (rhEPO), 9 (39.1%) roxadustat, 7 (30.4%) lenalidomide and 3 (13.0%) hypomethylating agents (HMA). The median treatment time was 22.9 weeks (9.0-32.4). At week 12, 60.9% (14/23) of the patients achieved a hematologic improvement-erythroid (HI-E) response. Red blood cell transfusion independence (RBC-TI) for ≥ 8 weeks was found in 57.1% (8/14) of transfusion-dependent patients. The median hemoglobin concentration was 84 g/L, and patients had significantly higher hemoglobin concentrations after 12 weeks of treatment (P < 0.001). It is noteworthy that responders had a greater reduction in serum ferritin (P = 0.021). Those with serum EPO < 500 IU/L at baseline tended to have a higher HI-E rate (P = 0.081), but only patients in non-transfusion and low transfusion burden (LTB) subgroups had statistical differences (P = 0.024). The most commonly occurring adverse events were blood bilirubin increase (17.4%), fatigue (13.0%) and dizziness (13.0%). Luspatercept was effective and tolerated well in refractory LR-MDS-SF3B1 patients. In particular, baseline non-transfusion and LTB patients exhibited a greater response rate to treatment.

Management of Patients with Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Neoplasms (MDS).

Myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDS) are a heterogenous group of clonal hematologic disorders characterized by morphologic dysplasia, ineffective hematopoiesis, and cytopenia. In the past year, the classification of MDS has been updated in the 5th edition of the World Health Organization (WHO) Classification of Haematolymphoid Tumours and the International Consensus Classification (ICC) of Myeloid Neoplasms and Acute Leukemia with incorporation of morphologic, clinical, and genomic data. Furthermore, the more comprehensive International Prognostic Scoring System-Molecular (IPSS-M) allows for improved risk stratification and prognostication. These three developments allow for more tailored therapeutic decision-making in view of the expanding treatment options in MDS. For patients with lower risk MDS, treatment is aimed at improving cytopenias, usually anemia. The recent approval of luspatercept and decitabine/cedazuridine have added on to the current armamentarium of erythropoietic stimulating agents and lenalidomide (for MDS with isolated deletion 5q). Several newer agents are being evaluated in phase 3 clinical trials for this group of patients, such as imetelstat and oral azacitidine. This review provides a summary of the classification systems, the prognostic scores and clinical management of patients with lower risk MDS.

[Treatment of lower risk myelodysplastic syndromes]. / Traitement des syndromes myélodysplasiques de bas risque.

For low-risk myelodysplastic syndromes, the goal of treatment is to correct cytopenias or their consequences. Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents have an important role in the management of anemia. In this chapter, we will detail the response to ESAs, the factors predictive of response to ESAs. However, the search for new therapeutic options for low-risk, ESA-resistant MDS remains necessary as the incidence of AML transformation of the patients is higher. We can retain luspatercept for MDS with excess ring of sideroblasts, lenalidomide, and some molecules currently being tested such as imetelstat or roxedustat. However, the search for new therapeutic options for ESA-resistant low-risk MDS remains necessary. We can use androgenotherapy or TPO agonists in limited access for symptomatic thrombocytopenia.

Treating Thalassemia Patients with Luspatercept: An Expert Opinion Based on Current Evidence.

Luspatercept has recently been approved for the treatment of beta-thalassemia and its use in clinical practice has been increasing. As it is the first erythroid maturation drug available for this diagnosis, the expertise about its use is still limited. To address this point, and to promote awareness and guide the clinical use of luspatercept in beta-thalassemia, this paper was developed as a consensus by experts from the Italian Society of Thalassemia and Hemoglobinopathies (SITE). After a brief presentation of the core features of luspatercept, a comprehensive set of questions is addressed, covering relevant aspects for the practical management of this new therapeutic option.

Raising the bar for lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes.

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are broadly categorized as lower- and higher-risk with lower-risk dominated by cytopenias and higher-risk plagued by the risk of transformation to acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The management of MDS utilize a risk-adapted approach aimed at ameliorating cytopenias in lower-risk MDS (LR-MDS) and preventing AML transformation in higher-risk MDS. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is a potentially curative intent therapy in higher-risk MDS; however, it is not routinely recommended in LR-MDS in view of unfavorable risk/benefit ratio. Therefore, the goal of treatment in LR-MDS is aimed at improving the transfusion burden and health related quality of life. Currently, erythropoiesis stimulating agents (recombinant erythropoietin), erythroid maturation agents (luspatercept), disease modifying agents (lenalidomide) and hypomethylating agents are the agents of choice in the treatment of LR-MDS. This review will discuss the current treatment standards, meaningful clinical outcomes, and emerging therapies in LR-MDS.

Management of luspatercept therapy in patients with transfusion-dependent ß-thalassaemia.

Patients with transfusion-dependent ß-thalassaemia require lifelong, regular red blood cell transfusions for survival; however, frequent blood transfusions are associated with an increased risk of iron overload, transfusion-transmitted disease and alloimmunization, as well as reduced quality of life. Luspatercept, an erythroid maturation agent that promotes late-stage erythroid maturation independently of erythropoietin, has demonstrated efficacy in reducing transfusion burden in patients with transfusion-dependent ß-thalassaemia. In this review, we discuss treatment initiation, ongoing evaluation, dose adjustment and management of adverse events in transfusion-dependent patients with ß-thalassaemia receiving luspatercept, and we provide guidance on how to determine whether patients are deriving clinical benefit.